CEAS Conference 2017 Bucharest, Oct 16-19 Philipp Schlösser … 2017/AFLoNext_CEAS2017... · 2017....
Transcript of CEAS Conference 2017 Bucharest, Oct 16-19 Philipp Schlösser … 2017/AFLoNext_CEAS2017... · 2017....
DESIGN OF A PULSED JET ACTUATORFOR SEPARATION CONTROL
CEAS Conference 2017 – Bucharest, Oct 16-19
Philipp Schlösser (Airbus Defence and Space GmbH)
Matthias Bauer (NAVASTO)
Separation Control at the Pylon/Wing Junction
Motivation
• Integration of UHBR engines requires larger slat cutouts
reduced high-lift performance
• Relevant (sub-)systems tested in real-size under realistic flow conditions (Ma, Re)
TRL 4 Test
2
single slotted flap
side plates
AFC location
Flow-through UHBR
nacelle
deployed slat
Design of a Pulsed Jet Actuator for Separation Control - CEAS Conference - October 2017
Installation of Pulsed Jet Actuator on WTM
3
Model span: ~6 m
Model chord: ~3.3 m
Actuated span: ~1 m
Design of a Pulsed Jet Actuator for Separation Control - CEAS Conference - October 2017
Pulsed Jet Actuator Design
Two-stage Concept
• Driving/1st stage: fluidic oscillator control signal
• Outlet/2nd stage: fluidic diverter elements generation of pulsed jets
4
Illustration of fluid flow inside acutator
Adapted design for application
at engine/wing junction
2nd stage element
1st stage
Design of a Pulsed Jet Actuator for Separation Control - CEAS Conference - October 2017
Pulsed Jet Actuator Design
Separation Control
• Injection of high-momentum into boundary layer
• Entrainment of high-momentum free-stream fluid
Benefits of pulsed actuation
• Generation of vortical structures
increased mixing rate increased momentum transfer
Benefits of two-stage design
• Efficiency – conversion of total to dynamic pressure is more efficient due to the application of several diverters driven by only one oscillator
• Compactness – driving multiple diverters with one oscillator
• Variability – independent setting of actuation amplitude and frequency
Design of a Pulsed Jet Actuator for Separation Control - CEAS Conference - October 2017 5
Requirements
Design of a Pulsed Jet Actuator for Separation Control - CEAS Conference - October 2017 6
Flow control / physics Model / geometryEnvironment / wind
tunnel• jet velocity / Mach number
• pulsation frequency range
• mass flow rate or outlet slot
dimensions
• number of slots
• geometric jet exit angle
• jet quality criterion
(jet velocity homogeneity)
• location of AFC system integration
• installation space
• interfaces for structure and
pressure supply
• loads on the AFC system
• temperature of ambient
and working fluid
• security factors issued by
the wind tunnel operators
can act as significant cost drivers for
testing and manufacturing!
Design Workflow
Design of a Pulsed Jet Actuator for Separation Control - CEAS Conference - October 2017 7
TheoreticalDesign
• Set approx. dimensions
• Set number of elements
• Estimate dimensions of critical cross-sections
Diverter Design (Outlet Stage)
• Iterative with CFD and experiment
• Use of rapid prototyping (3D-printing)
Oscillator Design and Combination
• Experimental design (CFD uneconomical)
• First full prototype testing
Final Design
• Interfaces (structure, air supply)
• Characterization prior to WTT
Ground Testing of Pulsed Jet Actuator
Prototype Testing
• First investigation of complete system
• Tuning of actuation frequency with variablefeedback length
• First characterization of jets
Final Testing
• Final system including air supply interface for WTT
• Including monitoring system (21 pressure sensors)
• „Calibration“ of system for WT application
Aquired Data
• Mass flow
• Frequency
• Jet Mach numbers (from three-hole probe)
• 21 pressure sensors for monitoring during WTT
8
Final actuator for WTT
Prototype
Design of a Pulsed Jet Actuator for Separation Control - CEAS Conference - October 2017
Ground Test Results
Prototype Testing
• Focus on actuationfrequency by variyingfeedback length
• Frequency decreaseswith length of feedbacklines
• Frequency increases withmass flow
Selection of final design from extrapolated data
Design of a Pulsed Jet Actuator for Separation Control - CEAS Conference - October 2017 9
Ground Test Results
Design of a Pulsed Jet Actuator for Separation Control - CEAS Conference - October 2017 10
Additional feedback length in final design
Frequency and size req‘ satsified!
Ground Test Results
Testing of final actuator
Mach numbers evaluated from three-hole probe
11
Diverter #7
Design of a Pulsed Jet Actuator for Separation Control - CEAS Conference - October 2017
Ground Test Results
Testing of final actuator
Mach numbers evaluated from three-hole probe
• Instants of peak Mach number for each slot
Similar symmetric patterns
High homogenity (𝑀 > 0.8 for large area)
• Mach number histories of two points
Full modulation
12Design of a Pulsed Jet Actuator for Separation Control - CEAS Conference - October 2017
Installation of Pulsed Jet Actuator
• Actuator successfully installed into wind tunnel model
• Testing finished in September 2017
Design of a Pulsed Jet Actuator for Separation Control - CEAS Conference - October 2017 13
Summary
Design of a Pulsed Jet Actuator for Separation Control - CEAS Conference - October 2017 14
Flow control / physics Model / geometryEnvironment / wind
tunnel• number of slots
• geometric jet exit angle
• jet velocity / Mach number
• pulsation frequency range
• mass flow rate
• jet quality criterion
(jet velocity homogeneity)
• location of AFC system integration
• installation space
• interfaces for structure and
pressure supply
• loads on the AFC system
• temperature of ambient
and working fluid
• security factors issued by
the wind tunnel operators
✓Ground Tests ✓
Installation✓
Successful WTT
Thank you for your attention!
15
Partners
Presenter
Philipp Schlösser [email protected] +49 89 607 28606
Co-Author
Matthias Bauer [email protected]
Acknowledgement
The work described in this presentation and the research leading to these results have received
funding from the European Community's Seventh Framework Programme FP7/2007-2013,
under grant agreement n° 604013, AFLONEXT project.
Design of a Pulsed Jet Actuator for Separation Control - CEAS Conference - October 2017