CDF Overview

16
CDF Overview Joseph Kroll Penn DOE Review 6 August 2007

description

CDF Overview. Joseph Kroll Penn DOE Review 6 August 2007. TexPoint fonts used in EMF. Read the TexPoint manual before you delete this box.: A A A A A A A. Faculty Joseph Kroll Nigel Lockyer (adjunct, not DOE) Evelyn Thomson Brig Williams Post-docs Anadi Canepa (not DOE) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of CDF Overview

Page 1: CDF Overview

CDF Overview

Joseph Kroll

Penn DOE Review

6 August 2007

Page 2: CDF Overview

Personnel

• Faculty– Joseph Kroll

– Nigel Lockyer (adjunct, not DOE)

– Evelyn Thomson

– Brig Williams

• Post-docs– Anadi Canepa (not DOE)

– Aart Heijboer

– Chris Neu

• Graduate Students– Justin Keung (20% DOE)

– Elizabetta Pianori

– Tatiana Rodriguez

– Yanjun Tu

• Instrumentation Group– Joel Heinrich

– Walter Kononenko

Advances in people’s careers:Kristian Hahn: MIT post-docAafke Kraan: Marie Curie EU FellowshipDaniel Whiteson: Assistant Professor UC Irvine

Page 3: CDF Overview

Contributions to CDF Experiment/Operations

• Major contributions of the past***– COT front end electronics - ASDQ ASIC & daughter board (Lockyer)

– TOF signal electronics (Jones, Oldeman, Chen, Usynin, Kroll)• Still carry TOF pager (Heijboer)

• Trigger Level 2 upgrade– Run IIa upgrade (Hahn, Neu, Whiteson, Kroll, Wittich)***

– Run IIb Calorimeter + general expertise (Canepa – see talk today)

• Calibration constants– 1st organized systematic calibration effort (Kraan)

– Set up automatic calibration procedure for production (Whiteson)

• Silicon tracking detector alignment (Heijboer)

***Critical contributions from Penn Instrumentation Specialists

Page 4: CDF Overview

Physics

• B Physics (this talk)– Primary participants in B0

s flavor oscillations

• Top Physics (see talk by E. Thomson)– Top cross-section

– Top mass

– Top decay properties (W helicity measurement)

• SUSY (see talk by A. Canepa)– High mass dilepton pairs (e¹, e¿, ¹¿)

• Standard Model Higgs (this talk & Thomson, Canepa)– Contributions in several areas – see details later in this presentation

Page 5: CDF Overview

Publications

Authors of 12 publications from CDF Run II in PRL or PRD including• 1st Tevatron Run II PRL (Charm cross-section, C. Chen thesis)• 1st Tevatron Run II High-pT PRL (top dilepton cross-section)

This past year we authored 5 publications

Page 6: CDF Overview

Observation of B0s Oscillations

• Penn played major leadership role• Began in Run I

– Development of flavor tagging– B0 oscillation measurements– Sin2¯ analysis– TOF prototype

• Run II Highlights– TOF critical for observation– Co-leader of analysis (Kroll)– 1st measurement of excess of kaons

around B0s (Usynin)

– Proposed & executed method to determine significance (Heijboer)

– Critical innovations to sped up likelihood fit (Heijboer)

– Primary authors of both PRLs

Page 7: CDF Overview
Page 8: CDF Overview

Conference Presentations by Penn People

Page 9: CDF Overview

Plans for the Coming Year

Tevatron CDF and

are both running extremely well

The most exciting results are still to come from these data

CDF: > 2.6 fb-1

80% eff.

Page 10: CDF Overview

Search for SM Higgs at Tevatron

Largest production cross-section

But QCD backgroundoverwhelms at low mass

H ! b¹b Instead search for

H ! W W (ZZ)

For low mass HiggsUse associated productionLeptonic W & Z easily identified

H ! b¹b

Page 11: CDF Overview

Penn Contributions to Higgs Search

• New trigger capabilities (see talk by A. Canepa)– L2 upgrade – Studies of trigger algorithms (Higgs trigger task force, ¿ triggers)– Increase trigger efficiency – especially as inst. L increases

• Understand backgrounds (see talk by E. Thomson)– Measure Wbb cross-section (see talk by E. Thomson)– Measure WZ, ZZ production

• Increase signal sensitivity (see talk by E. Thomson)– Z! bb for b-jet energy calibration– b tagging studies

• Add new signal paths– Build on ¿ id developed for dilepton SUSY search (A. Canepa talk)

• Add W!¿º¿ to WH channel• Use W!¿º in H! WW

– Use W,Z! qq0 in WH, ZH (discussed here)• Exploit experience with Matrix Element tech. used in top mass meas.

Page 12: CDF Overview

Motivation

V (= W or Z)

H

q

q

_

b

b_

All-hadronic channel has largest signalyield of all channels (Br W/Z ! qq ≈ 68%)Challenge: Large QCD bbqq backgroundRun I result was comparable with leptonicchannels: as good as Wl and Zl+l-

Not yet investigated in Tevatron Run II. Will add new events to ongoing searches.Data collected with multi-jet trigger originallyintended for all-hadronic ttbar.

CDF Run I PRL 95, 051801(2005)

Initiated by A. Heijboer + D. Whiteson. Joined upwith parallel initiative by group from AcademiaSinica (Taiwan).

qq=68%

ee

W decay modes

_qq=70%

ee

Z decay modes

_

___

Page 13: CDF Overview

Modeling the QCD background

idea: look in background-enriched 1-b tagsample to estimate the number of 2-b tag signal events. Determine the Tag Rate Fraction (TRF) in a region without VH signal.Backgrounds with real Z/W (e.g. ttbar) will be modeled by MC

Mbb

Mqq

VHsignal

'signal' region

qq sideband: useto measure TRF

qq sideband: useto measure TRF

Mbb (GeV)

TRF predictiondata

Tag rate functionpredicts #eventsin signal region.

_

_

Page 14: CDF Overview

Separating signal and background

particular for this analysis: O(100k) events to analyze. Execution speed had to be drastically improved (from 15 min ! 10 sec).S/B separation compares favorably to alternatives (NN, DBT)

data (QCD)Higgs signal MC

Discriminate between data and background using Likelihood computedusing Matrix Elements. The probability of seeing event x is:

matrix elementdescribes parton

level physics

integrate over unknown parton momenta

jet transfer functionsdescribes the detectorresponse to partons

QCD normalizedto signal MC

P(x|WH) + P(x|ZH)P(x|WH) + P(x|ZH) + P(x|QCD)

( )log

Likelihood ratio to discriminate signal and bg.

Page 15: CDF Overview

Separating signal and background

particular for this analysis: O(100k) events to analyze. Execution speed had to be drastically improved (from 15 min ! 10 sec).S/B separation compares favorably to alternatives (NN, DBT)

Discriminate between data and background using Likelihood computedusing Matrix Elements. The probability of seeing event x is:

matrix elementdescribes parton

level physics

integrate over unknown parton momenta

jet transfer functionsdescribes the detectorresponse to partons

P(x|WH) + P(x|ZH)P(x|WH) + P(x|ZH) + P(x|QCD)

( )log

Likelihood ratio to discriminate signal and bg.

Page 16: CDF Overview

Plan

First estimate of expected sensitivity expect limit around

sm=15 for low M

H

Comparable to other analysesGood prospect for adding significantlyto combined Tevatron limit.

Goal: Complete a ~2 fb-1 analysis by the end of the year.

Possible improvements:Add other trigger paths potentially factor ~2 more dataAnalyze events with 1 b-tagequivalent to adding ~50% statisticsUse advances b-tagging algorithmsAdd Vector Boson Fusion channel(initial studies being done by P. Methala, Univ. Helsinki).

exluded by LEP

sensitivity estimate for 1.7 fb-1

(no systematics included)