CDC Assessment Urban Institute

download CDC Assessment Urban Institute

of 3

Transcript of CDC Assessment Urban Institute

  • 7/29/2019 CDC Assessment Urban Institute

    1/3

    HowdoClevelandscommunitydevelopmentorganizationsranknationally?

    LocalLISCandEnterprisestaffrankingof23NCDIcitiesconductedin2000.RatingfactorsandperformancestandardsutilizedanddevisedbyUrbanInstituteresearchersin

    cooperationwithLISC,Enterprise,andtheNCDISecretariat.Thefactorsarethefollowing:

  • 7/29/2019 CDC Assessment Urban Institute

    2/3

    WhatExplainstheRelativePerformanceofthe23Cities?Inthediscussionstofollow,we

    willshowthatthestrongestindustriesasshowninfigure2.1alsohavesomeofthebest

    functioningcommunitydevelopmentsupportsystems.

    ResearchwillshowthatNewYorkCity,Cleveland,Portland,OR,andSeattlehavefourof

    thetopfivebestfunctioningcommunitydevelopmentsystems.(Bostonhasthefifth.)

    Washington,D.C.oneofthestrongindustriesonthecharthasasuperiorcapacity-

    buildingsystem,whichhelpsoffsetitscomplexandinefficientproductionsystem.

    ResearchalsowillshowthatLosAngeles,Miami,andDallashavetheweakestproduction

    andcapacitybuildingsystems.

    TheothercityintheweakestquartileColumbuscreatedcompetentproductionand

    capacity-buildingsystemsonlyinthepastseveralyears.Butoverall,CDCcapacity

    improvedinnearlyeveryNCDIcityprimarilybecauseoneormoreofthebuildingblocks

    ofthecommunitydevelopmentsystemimproved.Weturnfirsttotheproductionsystemandhowitchanged.

  • 7/29/2019 CDC Assessment Urban Institute

    3/3

    Collaborationinsustainedpolicyapplicationandfunding

    Itisdifficulttooverestimatetheimportanceofnewfundingcollaborativestothestrengtheningof

    leadershipsystemsincities.InsomesystemsCleveland,Washington,D.C.,Philadelphia,Atlanta,Seattlecollaborativeshavebecomeindispensableintermediariesthroughwhichrelationshipsamong

    systemstakeholdersandbetweensystemandneighborhoodstakeholdersareforgedandsustained.Communitydevelopmentcorporationsrecognizetheimportance

    CHALLENGES-Theareaofcivicleadershipisthemostdifficultonetopredict,giventhecomplexityofrelationshipswithinandacrosscomponentsofthefinancialservicesindustry,localandnational

    philanthropy,andfederal,state,andlocalgovernment.Perhapswecanexpecttoseethefollowing:

    Stabilityoflocalfundingcommitmentsforcommunitydevelopmentfrompublicandprivatesourcesas

    thenetworkofrelationshipsamonglocalandnationalfundershelpsreinforcecommitmentstothefieldmadethroughoutthe1990s;

    Increasedattentiontonewimmigrantcommunitiesasdemographicchangesbecomereflected

    inincreasedpoliticalpowerforHispanicneighborhoods,inparticular.Thismaystretch

    communitydevelopmentresourcesmorethinly,butalsomayheightenoverallinvestmentsin

    neighborhoodsandawayfrommajordowntownprojects.

    SOURCE:CommunityDevelopmentCorporationsandtheirChangingSupportSystems .December2002,Copyright2002,

    by,ChristopherWalker,TheUrbanInstitute,MetropolitanHousingandCommunitiesPolicyCenter ,2100MStreet,NW,

    Washington,DC20037