CCQM – Gas Analysis Working Group

24
CCQM – Gas Analysis Working Group Jin Seog Kim KRISS Presentation to CCQM April 2016 C C Q M G A W G

Transcript of CCQM – Gas Analysis Working Group

Page 1: CCQM – Gas Analysis Working Group

CCQM – Gas Analysis Working Group

Jin Seog Kim

KRISS

Presentation to CCQM

April 2016

CCQM

GAWG

Page 2: CCQM – Gas Analysis Working Group

34th Meeting (participants 47: 21 Economies+BIPM/NOAA/IAEA) – 18th-19th Apr. 2016, BIPM

• 12 comparisons in 2015-2016 – K84 (CO), K101 (oxygen/nitrogen), K90 (formaldehyde),

K111 (core KC, propane), K112 (Biogas), K113 (Noble gas),

K116 (Water vapour), K117 (ammonia), K118 (Natural gas),

K119 (LPG), K121 (terpenes), K120 (ambient CO2)

• 8 comparisons in 2017-2019 – K137 (core KC, NO), K41.2017 (H2S),

– K74.2018 (NO2), K3.2018 (automotive gases), K10.2018 (BTEX)

– K26b.2019 (SO2), K68.2019 (ambient N2O)

– Pxxx (particle number/charge concentration), Pxxx (Particle mass con.)

• 3 KC, 5 RMO KC & SC in KCDB – K94 (DMS), BIPM.QM-K1 (ISCIII, DMDM)

– APMP 2, COOMET 3 2

Summary of 2015/2016

Page 3: CCQM – Gas Analysis Working Group

• Draft A KC reports

• 7 planed KCs (Repeat KCs)

• Approval of strategy document of track A KC

- CMC re-review for Cycle XVIII

• Other issues

- Task group on strategy of particle/black carbon

- Task group on ozone cross section

• Next meeting

3

Today’s report

Page 4: CCQM – Gas Analysis Working Group

4

Core KC: CCQM-K111 Propane in Nitrogen VSL

(draft A)

APMP.QM-K111 Draft A CERI

EURAMET.QM-K111 Draft A VSL

COOMET.QM-K111 Measurement VNIIM

SIM.QM-K111 Measurement INMETRO

Page 5: CCQM – Gas Analysis Working Group

Page

CCQM-K111

5

CERI INMETRO KRISS NIST NMISA NPL VNIIM VSL

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

15

diffe

renc

e (µ

mol

/mol

)

Laboratory

CCQM-K111.1 NMISA, VSL draft A

Page 6: CCQM – Gas Analysis Working Group
Page 7: CCQM – Gas Analysis Working Group
Page 8: CCQM – Gas Analysis Working Group

CCQM-K90 Formaldehyde 2 µmol/mol in nitrogen BIPM

(Draft A) (to support air quality regulation)

NIST could not report a value, because of instrumental problem

• Cylinder still at NIST

• Draft A report written without any measurements on cylinder attributed to

NIST Subsequent comparison (K90.1)

Set of transfer standards value assigned by BIPM

Page 9: CCQM – Gas Analysis Working Group

CCQM-K112 Biogas VSL

(Draft A) Component Drift - min Drift - max Homogeneity

Methane -0.12% 0.04% 0.14%

Carbon dioxide -0.09% 0.12% 0.38%

Nitrogen -0.14% 0.01% 0.52%

Hydrogen -0.24% 0.13% 0.26%

Oxygen -1.54% -1.07% 9.21%

Ethane -0.15% 0.22% 0.28%

Propane -0.66% 0.34% 0.32%

A B C D E F G H J K A

-0.05

-0.04

-0.03

-0.02

-0.01

0.00

0.01

0.02

0.03

0.04

0.05

0.06 reference value

consensus value

diffe

ren

ce

(cm

ol/m

ol)

laboratory

Degrees-of-equivalence oxygen

KCRV: Reference values

Page 10: CCQM – Gas Analysis Working Group

CCQM-K119 LPG

(Draft A)

Page 11: CCQM – Gas Analysis Working Group

CCQM-K121 Terpenes NIST

Degrees of equivalence between lab value and KCRV for each monoterpene. Error bars represent expanded

uncertainties, U Diff = sqrt(uKCRV2 + uLab

2); k = 2. Dashed lines represent uncertainties of gravimetric values, k = 2.

Page 12: CCQM – Gas Analysis Working Group

CCQM-K116 10 µmol/mol H2O/N2 NPL June 2015: cylinders to participants, NIM

CCQM-K117 10-30 µmol/mol NH3 in nitrogen VSL Jan. 2017: cylinders to participants

CCQM-K118 Natural gas (with H2) BAM/VSL

Jan 2017: cylinders to participants

CCQM-K120a & K120b Ambient level CO2 BIPM Nov. 2016: prepared cylinders to BIPM

On-going KCs: Measurement in 2016

Page 13: CCQM – Gas Analysis Working Group

CCQM-K117 Ammonia 20 µmol/mol VSL

(Protocol ready, Analytical comparison)

• 50 L aluminium cylinders with UN-stamps are available

• Gas company can be filled with an ammonia in nitrogen

mixture at 150 bar with delivery time 5 months

• But the costs associated with the cylinders are approx. € 16000

• Participant will pay € 2000 for the comparison cylinder and

after finishing of KC measurement the participants will own

the Cyl.

Terminology: analytical & preparative

Analytical comparison: Coordinator Lab prepare comparison Cyl.

Distribute Cyl. to participants

Preparative comparison: Participant prepare comparison Cyl.

Transfer Cyl to coordinator

Page 14: CCQM – Gas Analysis Working Group

CCQM-K137 Core KC 30-70 µmol/mol NO/N2 BIPM June 2017: prepared 2 cylinders to BIPM

CCQM-K41.2017 10 µmol/mol H2S/N2 KRISS May 2017: cylinders to participants

CCQM-K74.2017 10 µmol/mol NO2/N2 BIPM March 2018: prepared cylinders to BIPM

CCQM-K3.2018 Automobile gases VSL April 2018: cylinders to participants

CCQM-K10.2018 BTEX NIST April 2018: prepared cylinders to NIST

CCQM-K26b.2019 300 nmol/mol SO2 NIST 2019: cylinders to participants

CCQM-K68.2019 ambient N2O BIPM 2019: prepared cylinders to BIPM

Planed KCs: Measurement during 2017-2019

Page 15: CCQM – Gas Analysis Working Group

Outline programme

Reference No. Description Coordinating

Laboratory

Expected

Start date Status

Rational for Key

Comparison

BIPM.QM-K1 KC (Ozone at ambient level) BIPM / 20

2007 -

ongoing on-going Atmospheric and air quality

CCQM-K90 KC (Formaldehyde in air) BIPM 2015 A Atmospheric and air quality

CCQM-K111 Core KC (Propane in Nitrogen) VSL 2014 A Core mixtures

CCQM-K112 KC (Biogas) VSL 2014 A Energy gases (Renewable)

CCQM-K113 KC (Noble Gases Mixture) KRISS 2014 A New emerging requirements

CCQM-K116 KC (Water vapour 10ppm) NPL 2015 M New emerging requirements

CCQM-K117 KC (NH3) VSL&NIST 2015 P Atmospheric and air quality

CCQM-K118 KC (Natural gas) VSL & BAM 2015 P Energy gases

CCQM-K119 KC (LPG) NPL 2015 A Energy gases

CCQM-K121 KC (Monoterpenes in Nitrogen) NIST 2015 A Atmospheric and air quality

CCQM-K120a KC (Ambient CO2, 380 to 480 μmol/mol) BIPM with NIST 2016 P Atmospheric and air quality

CCQM-K120b

Core KC (Ambient CO2, 380 to 800

μmol/mol) BIPM with NIST 2016 P Atmospheric and air quality

CCQM-K137

Core KC (NO in Nitrogen, 30-70

μmol/mol) BIPM 2017

Atmospheric and air quality

(Core mixtures)

CCQM-K41.2017 KC (H2S in Nitrogen, 10 μmol/mol) KRISS 2017

Atmospheric and air quality

(Non core mixture)

CCQM-PXX

PC(Micro-scale particles, number/charge

concentration) PTB/NPL 2017 New emerging requirements

CCQM-PXX

PC(Micro-scale particles, mass

concentration) VNIIM 2017 New emerging requirements

CCQM-K74.2018 KC (NO2 in Nitrogen, 10 μmol/mol) BIPM 2018 Atmospheric and air quality

CCQM-K3.2018 KC (Automotive gases) VSL 2018 Car emission gases

CCQM-K10,2018 BTEX/VOC NIST 2018 Air Quality

CCQM-K26b.2019 KC (300 nmol/mol SO2) NPL 2019 Analytical capability

CCQM-K68.2019 KC (Ambient N2O)

BIPM with

KRISS 2019 Atmospheric and air quality

CCQM-PXX

PC (Carbon/Oxygen isotope ratios in

CO2 ) BIPM/IAEA 2019 New emerging requirements

CCQM-KXX Core KC (SO2) NIST 2020 Core mixtures

CCQM-KXX KC (New energy gas) 2020 Energy gases

CCQM-KXX KC (Nano & micro-scale particles) 2020 New emerging requirements

CCQM-KXX KC (ppb level of water vapour) 2021 New emerging requirements

CCQM-PXX PC(HCl or HF in workplace air) 2021 Atmospheric and air quality

CCQM-KXX Core KC (CO) 2022 Core mixtures

Page 16: CCQM – Gas Analysis Working Group

Page

Approval of GAWG strategy document on the 19th April, 2016

GAWG strategy for comparisons and CMC claims

by Paul Brewer and Adriaan van der Veen

- Strategy for selecting comparison studies for the GAWG

work programme

- Strategy for CMC claims

- Implementation of the flexible scheme to support CMCs

- Guidance for CMC claims for purity analysis

- Guidance for linking RMO comparisons to track A key

comparisons

- Annex A: Example calculations for track A (K52, K53 and

K76) and track B (K82)

Page 17: CCQM – Gas Analysis Working Group

Page

CMC Re-review for cycle XVIII

Re-review items: Track A (flexible scheme) components

• Evidence based on track record from previous core comparisons • Optional - can continue using existing approach

GAWG Strategy Plan (2017-2027) The task team for revision of strategic plan of GAWG

JS Kim, Robert, Paul, Adriaan, Jerry, Hanspeter

Page 18: CCQM – Gas Analysis Working Group

Page

Task group on Particulate Comparison

• Members:

Liu Junji (NIM), Paul Quincy (NPL), Andreas Nowak

(PTB), Hanspeter Andres (METAS), Shankar G.

Aggarwal (NPLI) and Yuri Kustikov (VNIIM)

• Strategy development:

June 2015: kick-off at ETHZ particle conference

Sep. 2015: first draft available to circulate

• Comparison protocols:

Presented at GAWG meeting (April 2016)

Page 19: CCQM – Gas Analysis Working Group

PS sizing: a) 2.5 / 10 mm

b) 1 – 10 nm

Draft Roadmap

2016 2018 2020 202X

size

key/parallel PS Number &

charge concentration

10 nm

500 nm

2.5 mm 10 mm

PS mass

concentration

PS number

concentration PS BC

time

*PS = pilot study

Page 20: CCQM – Gas Analysis Working Group

28.07.2016 METAS 20

Coordination: PTB/NPL

Host: TROPOS (WMO WCC physical aerosol measurements)

Participants: PTB, NPL, METAS, NPLI, KRISS, VINITFRI,

NMIJ(?), NIM (?), LNE (?), BAM (?), TROPOS (if WEM agrees)

Timescale: Protocol: October 2016

comparison in first quarter 2017

Draft A: October 2017

Draft B: April 2018

Comparison on number / charge concentration Repeat of EURAMET 1224 (charge conc.),1282 (number conc.)

CCQM.Pxxx Particle Comparison in 2017

Page 21: CCQM – Gas Analysis Working Group

1993

Room-temperature ozone cross sections at 253.65 nm

0.9 %

Task Group on Ozone Cross Section

GAWG: Joseph Hodges (NIST), Joëlle Viallon (BIPM), Robert Wielgosz (BIPM),

Sangil Lee (KRISS), Paul Brewer (NPL), Jari Walden (FMI)

Other: Christof Janssen (Paris-Jussieu) and !!!

Gas phase titration

Page 22: CCQM – Gas Analysis Working Group

Page

Sources of Measurement Uncertainty & Bias Relative weighting of published data will be influenced by uncertainties in: sample conditions: purity & stability (O3 molar fraction), temperature, pressure transmittance measurement pathlength type of source (Hg lamp, continuum, laser) instability in irradiance of light source

spectral contribution from other Hg lines baseline stability & stray light detector non-linearity

Will need to assess appropriate combined uncertainties of literature data

Page 23: CCQM – Gas Analysis Working Group

23

• Progress report Core KCs (K111 series), Protocols for New KCs • Approval of ‘Strategy Document’ for flexible CMC

application • Task team for GAWG strategy document (2017-

2027) • Next GAWG Meeting (11-14 October 2016, IPQ) 11-12 GAWG meeting 13 Workshop on Scientific results 14 Workshop on Standards and Measurements for Clean Air • 2017 Fall meeting: October 2017, VSL

Summary

Page 24: CCQM – Gas Analysis Working Group

24

34th GAWG Meeting, 18th-19th Apr. 2016, BIPM

Acknowledgements All member participants, Coordinators of comparisons,

and Experts who provide presentations.