CCG PH commissioning presentation Jan 2016

12
Presentation Title Date Name Title Cheshire East Council Public Health Commissioning January 2016

Transcript of CCG PH commissioning presentation Jan 2016

Page 1: CCG PH commissioning presentation Jan 2016

Presentation TitleDate

NameTitle

Cheshire East Council

Public Health Commissioning

January 2016

Page 2: CCG PH commissioning presentation Jan 2016

Strategic overview

To improve Public Health outcomes in Cheshire East, targeting

communities with the worst outcomes

Page 3: CCG PH commissioning presentation Jan 2016

Place Based Approach

Page 4: CCG PH commissioning presentation Jan 2016

The Budget – Place based

Gawsworth

Wybunbury

Chelford

Audlem

Sutton

Disley

Prestbury

Wilmslow Dean Row

Sandbach Elworth

Sandbach Ettiley Heath and Wheelock

Sandbach Town

Macclesfield East

Leighton

Poynton East and Pott Shrigley

Macclesfield Central

Nantwich South and Stapeley

Broken Cross and Upton

Poynton West and Adlington

Wilmslow West and Chorley

Dane Valley

Nantwich North and West

Alsager

Knutsford

Congleton West

Congleton East

Crewe South

£0 £50,000 £100,000 £150,000 £200,000 £250,000 £300,000 £350,000 £400,000

Funding Profile - example

Page 5: CCG PH commissioning presentation Jan 2016

Commissioning example

Page 6: CCG PH commissioning presentation Jan 2016

Service Vision

A new integrated system to assess individual need for access to primary prevention, lifestyle

services, information and advice

Page 7: CCG PH commissioning presentation Jan 2016
Page 8: CCG PH commissioning presentation Jan 2016

Q4. How likely would you be to use a new integrated lifestyle and wellness support system?

Very Likely

Fairly Likely

Neither

Fairly Unlikely

Very Unlikely

19

42

14

11

14 Base = 100

Page 9: CCG PH commissioning presentation Jan 2016

Q8. Resources/ Payment

I would be prepared to pay for lifestyle and wellbeing services if they would make a real difference to my health (164)

Offering people more choice over the type of lifestyle and wellbeing services they can receive is positive/ is a good thing (164)

It is right to put more resources for lifestyle and wellness services into the areas of Cheshire East where there is evidence of poorer health

(165)

23

79

80

56

67

59

42

14

12

20

2

11

11

0

1

13

2

1

Strongly Agree Agree Neither Agree or Disagree Disagree Strongly Disagree Don't Know / Not Sure

Page 10: CCG PH commissioning presentation Jan 2016

Presentation TitleDate

NameTitle

Cheshire East Council

Level Amount Difference Per person1 £92,340 £0 £11.402 £110,421 £18,081 £14.783 £132,042 £39,702 £17.534 £157,897 £65,556 £23.165 £188,813 £96,473 £25.876 £225,784 £133,444 £36.587 £269,994 £177,653 £38.238 £322,860 £230,519 £46.379 £386,077 £293,737 £55.52

Example: Five fold difference in Spend by Ward

Ward Name Total Spend Alderley Edge £65,323Bollington £166,223Brereton Rural £60,287Bunbury £51,839Congleton West £305,277Crewe Central £230,453Crewe East £636,303Crewe North £161,038Crewe St Barnabas £257,932Crewe South £603,287

Example: Total spending by Ward

Page 11: CCG PH commissioning presentation Jan 2016

The Budget – Place based

Gawsworth

Wybunbury

Chelford

Audlem

Sutton

Disley

Prestbury

Wilmslow Dean Row

Sandbach Elworth

Sandbach Ettiley Heath and Wheelock

Sandbach Town

Macclesfield East

Leighton

Poynton East and Pott Shrigley

Macclesfield Central

Nantwich South and Stapeley

Broken Cross and Upton

Poynton West and Adlington

Wilmslow West and Chorley

Dane Valley

Nantwich North and West

Alsager

Knutsford

Congleton West

Congleton East

Crewe South

£0 £50,000 £100,000 £150,000 £200,000 £250,000 £300,000 £350,000 £400,000

Funding Profile - example

Page 12: CCG PH commissioning presentation Jan 2016

Closing Remarks• Future Challenge