CBM+: Practitioner’s Guide to Implementing a Successful ... · to Implementing a Successful...
Transcript of CBM+: Practitioner’s Guide to Implementing a Successful ... · to Implementing a Successful...
CBM+: Practitioner’s Guide to Implementing a Successful Program:
Failure Modes, Effects, and Criticality Analysis
Continuously Pushing the Limits of Innovation, Technology & Conventional Thinking
JC Leverette [email protected] 904.637.2016
FMECA Overview
FMECA Failure Modes, Effects, and Criticality Analysis
Identifies: Item – What it is (Tire)
Functions – What it does (Provides traction)
Functional Failures – How it fails to do it (Loss of traction)
Failure Modes – Why it fails to do it (worn tread)
Failure Effects – What happens when it fails (doesn’t channel water, hydroplane, car crashes)
Severity of Failure – How bad it is ($ damage, possible loss of life)
Failure Frequency – How often it happens (50K miles)
Criticality – Severity + Frequency (usually a Hazard Risk Index)
FMECA Uses The primary objective of an FMECA is to improve the design. For System FMEAs, the objective is to improve the design of the system. For Design FMEAs, the objective is to improve the design of the subsystem or component. For Process FMECAs, the objective is to improve the design of the processes such as manufacturing. 1
Other objectives for of FMEAs include:
Identify and prevent safety hazards Minimize loss of product performance or performance degradation Improve test and verification plans (in the case of System or Design FMEAs) Improve Process Control Plans (in the case of Process FMEAs) Consider changes to the product design or manufacturing process Identify significant product or process characteristics Develop Preventive Maintenance plans for in-service machinery and equipment Develop online diagnostic techniques
Develop Supportability Elements FM = Corrective Maintenance RCM = Preventive Maintenance
1 Effective FMEAs: Achieving Safe, Reliable, and Economical Products and Processes Using Failure Mode and Effects Analysis, Carl Carlson, May 2012
5
FMECA Role in Supportability
Design
Interface Maintenance
Planning
Maintenance
Scheduling
Maintenance
Execution
System Description & Operation Drawings Functional Block Diagram
LORA
Scheduled Maintenance Tasks
Off-Aircraft Maint.
On-Aircraft Maint.
O, I, D
Maint.
Data
Tools/SE
TTR
Skills/Rate
Facility Requirements
Manpower
Consumables
Repairables
PHS&T
Computer Resources
HAZMAT/Environmental
Operational Demand
Planning (i.e. CONOPs , Op. Architecture,
WSPD, TYCOM Plans)
FMECA
PSE LEMS
Training
Tech Data
Manpower
SE
Spares
PHS&T
Facilities
Tools, etc
Use study
BCS – CA
Functional RQMTS
Standardization/
interoperability
AoA Trade Studies
D/I
Failure Modes
Fly to Fail
Hard time
Failure Finding
Lube – Service
Condition monitoring • PHM/CBM+
• Inspect & Repair
• Conditional Task
Other (redesign, ECP)
Age Exploration
RCM
L&Sim Inputs
Existing Repair Cap
“Default” Data
MTA
O-level
I-level
D-level
O-level
I-level
D-level
Unscheduled Maintenance Tasks
Task level
feedback
sFMECA Use of Design FMECA for SA has been challenging
Typical product development organization: FMECA performed by Design engineers or R&M
“Kicked over the fence” to Supportability/Logistics for SA
Design vs sFMECA Focus
Design focus on elimination of critical failure modes
sFMECA focused on development of support elements necessary to maintain and repair
Level of Analysis Design: Piece part or lower
sFMECA: Only to level of support action (LOR)
Context sFMECA should also includes failures of the support system itself
Future SAE G-11 Project sFMECA Standard/Guide