CBA Final Power Point
-
Upload
yan-natalio -
Category
Documents
-
view
220 -
download
0
Transcript of CBA Final Power Point
-
8/7/2019 CBA Final Power Point
1/42
-
8/7/2019 CBA Final Power Point
2/42
OverviewOverview
Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA)
Origin
Definitions Purpose
Principles of CBA
Steps in Construction of CBA
Sample Case
-
8/7/2019 CBA Final Power Point
3/42
OriginOrigin
Conceived by the French engineer JulesDupuit in 1848
In 1936, through the Federal Navigation Act of1936, U.S. Corps of Engineers had createdsystematic methods for measuring benefitsand costs to carry out the improvement of the
waterway system. The engineers of the Corpsdid this without much assistance from theeconomics profession.
-
8/7/2019 CBA Final Power Point
4/42
OriginOrigin
In 1950s, economists tried to provide a rigorous,
consistent set of methods for measuring benefitsand costs and deciding whether a project is
worthwhile.
-
8/7/2019 CBA Final Power Point
5/42
CostCost--Benefit Analysis (CBA)Benefit Analysis (CBA)
"...a systematic quantitative methodof
assessing the desirability of governmentprojects or policies when it is important to
take a long view of future effects and a broad
view of possible side-effects."
(White House, 1994)
-
8/7/2019 CBA Final Power Point
6/42
Cost Benefit Analysis (CBA)Cost Benefit Analysis (CBA)
The implicit or explicit assessment of the
benefits and costs (i.e., pros and cons,advantages anddisadvantages) associated
with a particular choice
-
8/7/2019 CBA Final Power Point
7/42
Cost Benefit Analysis (CBA)Cost Benefit Analysis (CBA)
Commonly used in evaluating public projects
and programs such as:
Building dams, bridges, airports or highways Planning for safety (i.e. drunk driving laws, traffic
circles)
Spending f or education and research (i.e.
libraries, public schools) Health care systems
Other projects that government might fund
-
8/7/2019 CBA Final Power Point
8/42
Purpose ofCBAPurpose ofCBA
To ensure that the public sector allocates
scarce resources efficiently to competing
public sector projects.
To clarify which of the potential alternative
programs, policies or projects (including the
status quo) is the most efficient (closest to
efficient)
-
8/7/2019 CBA Final Power Point
9/42
To provide information to the decision-maker
the official who will appraise or evaluate
the project.
appraise in a prospective sense, referring to the
process of actually deciding whether resources
are to be allocated to the project or not
evaluate in a retrospective sense, referring to theprocess of reviewing the performance of a project
or program.
Purpose ofCBAPurpose ofCBA
-
8/7/2019 CBA Final Power Point
10/42
Principles ofCBAPrinciples ofCBA
Discounted PV of benefits > Disc PV
of costs
Time Value ofMoney
Involve a
With vs WithoutComparison
Common Unit of Measurement
Avoid DoubleCounting of
Benefits or Costs
Cost
Benefit
Analysis
MONEY ($ or )
Decision Criteria for
Projects
-
8/7/2019 CBA Final Power Point
11/42
1. There must be a common unit of measurement.
(The most convenient common unit is money. )
2. Time value of money needs to be considered.A dollar available five years from now is not as good as a dollar available now. This isbecause a dollar available now can be invested and earn interest for five years andwould be worth more than a dollar in five years.
If the interest rate is r then a dollar invested for t years will grow to be (1+r)t. Thereforethe amount of money that would have to be deposited now so that it would grow to beone dollar t years in the future is (1+r)-t.
This called the discounted value or present value of a dollar available t years in the
future.When the dollar value of benefits at some time in the future is multiplied by the discounted valueof one dollar at that time in the future the result is discounted present value of that benefit of theproject. The same thing applies to costs.
The net benefit of the projects is just the sum of the present value of the benefits less the presentvalue of the costs.
Principles ofCBAPrinciples ofCBA
-
8/7/2019 CBA Final Power Point
12/42
Principles of CBAPrinciples of CBA
3.The analysis of a project should involve a with versus withoutcomparison.
4.Double counting of benefits or costs must be avoided.
5. Involves a particular study area
6.Decision Criteria for Projects:If the discounted present value of the benefits exceeds the discounted presentvalue of the costs then the project is worthwhile. This is equivalent to thecondition that the net benefit must be positive. Another equivalent conditionis that the ratio of the present value of the benefits to the present value of thecosts must be greater than one.
If there are more than one mutually exclusive projects that have positive netpresent value then there has to be further analysis. From the set of mutuallyexclusive projects the one that should be selected is the one with the highestnet present value.
-
8/7/2019 CBA Final Power Point
13/42
WithWith--andand--Without ApproachWithout Approach
To build a dam
Scarce land, labor & capital
if combined can increase
production of food
(opportunity cost of building
the dam)
opportunity cost of
not building the
dam is the amount
of energy that can
be produced by the
dam
if the with path is chosen
additional electricity valued
by consumers at X
will be available
if the without path is
chosen extra food
valued at Y will be
available.
-
8/7/2019 CBA Final Power Point
14/42
Steps in Construction ofCBASteps in Construction ofCBA
A comprehensive cost-benefit analysis consists of:
Specification of objectives and constraints
I
dentification of all the factors (favorable andunfavorable) which can flow into community
because of that project
Financial valuation of costs and benefits
Decide on best alternative
-
8/7/2019 CBA Final Power Point
15/42
Specify ObjectivesSpecify Objectives
Objectives are often easy to state in general terms butare difficult to quantify
Ex. To improve mass transit services
Do we just want to move a given number of people in lesstime?
What kind of services should we offer? What aboutpassenger comfort?
Will the project impose environmental costs or reduce
them?
The constraint structure will help identify feasiblepreliminary planning objectives
-
8/7/2019 CBA Final Power Point
16/42
Costs - intended or unintended negative
effectsof a project
Direct
Indirect
Identify Factors which can flowIdentify Factors which can flow
into communityinto community
-
8/7/2019 CBA Final Power Point
17/42
Classification ofCostsClassification ofCosts
Direct Costs directly associated with the project or
activity
Research and planning outlays
Initial capital outlay
Maintenance and operation expenses over the projects
life
Implicit costs are difficult to estimate
Ex. Cost of using land use opportunity cost approach
-> ascertain its present value in its next best use
-
8/7/2019 CBA Final Power Point
18/42
Classification ofCostClassification ofCost
Indirect Costs external or 3rd party costs;
generally related to externalities
Externalities - welfare changes in societyattributable to the project, for which the
project does not pay or receive financial
compensation.
favorable (positive externalities)
detrimental (negative externalities)
-
8/7/2019 CBA Final Power Point
19/42
Classification ofCostClassification ofCost
Project External Effect Classification
Immunization
program against
a transmittable
disease
individual not being able to spread the
disease to others
reduces absenteeism and creates a
better quality of life and higher living
standards
Positive
Positive
Construction of
subways
disruption of traffic and business activity
employment generation
Negative
Positive
-
8/7/2019 CBA Final Power Point
20/42
Benefits - intended or unintended positive
effects of a project.
Direct benefits obtained by the users of the
project or activity
Indirect benefits similar to indirect costs, related
to externalities
Classification ofCostClassification ofCost
-
8/7/2019 CBA Final Power Point
21/42
A valuation of benefits of non-market nature
and in-tangible benefits should be based on
one from three possible methods: direct valuation,
indirect market value
social values
Financial valuation of costsFinancial valuation of costs
and benefitsand benefits
-
8/7/2019 CBA Final Power Point
22/42
Discounting
If costs and benefits occur over time, it will benecessary to discount the value of such stream usingsocial rate of discount(lowerthan thatused byprivate sector)
Results can be sensitive to the discount rate chosen
Conduct a sensitivity analysis to see how sensitivethe results are to changes in assumptions about thediscount rate, costs, and benefits
Financial valuation of costsFinancial valuation of costs
and benefitsand benefits
-
8/7/2019 CBA Final Power Point
23/42
Net Present Value or Internal Rate of Return
most commonly used decision criteria of CBA.
Less used is the Benefit-Cost Ratio (BCR). They are used equally for financial and economic
CBA.
Financial valuation of costsFinancial valuation of costs
and benefitsand benefits
-
8/7/2019 CBA Final Power Point
24/42
Financial valuation of costsFinancial valuation of costs
and benefitsand benefits
Net Present Value (NPV)
The sum of all discounted costs and benefits.
This sum reflects how much the project willearn.
If the NPV is negative, clearly the costsoutweigh the benefits and the project is not
economically feasible. Project are selected if NPV>=0
-
8/7/2019 CBA Final Power Point
25/42
Financial valuation of costsFinancial valuation of costs
and benefitsand benefits
Internal Rate of Return (IRR)
rate with which the discounted costs equal
the discounted benefits, that is it would bejust break-even at that particular rate
if the IRR is higher, the project would be
profitable
-
8/7/2019 CBA Final Power Point
26/42
Financial valuation of costsFinancial valuation of costs
and benefitsand benefits
Benefit-cost ratio (BCR)
while NPV is the difference between all costs and
benefits, the BCR is the ratioof (discounted) costs
and benefits
For a project to be selected, the BCR should
exceed 1
-
8/7/2019 CBA Final Power Point
27/42
The choice is between the status quo and theproject. A project with positive net benefit is animprovement on the status quo.
Example The government is considering building a dam along a
major river in Luzon. There are 6 possible dam plans,including the option of not building.
The one with the maximum net benefit should beselected. If all dam plans imply negative net benefits, notbuilding the dam delivers the highest net benefit: zero.
Financial valuation of costsFinancial valuation of costs
and benefitsand benefits
-
8/7/2019 CBA Final Power Point
28/42
A program should be undertaken if, and only if,
N
SB = TSB TSC > 0where:
NSB = Netsocial benefits
TSB = Totalsocial benefits
TSC = Totalsocial costs
Decision CriteriaDecision Criteria
-
8/7/2019 CBA Final Power Point
29/42
Sample CaseSample Case
Ferry (status quo)
5 million trips annually at
$2 per trip
Average cost per trip is $1,
profit per trip is $1
Proposed Bridge
Construction Cost $85M
Annual operating and
maintenance cost $5M
Toll-free
10M estimated commuting
trips per year
Assumed discount rate = 4%
Project: Construction of a harbor bridge to connect to an
island
-
8/7/2019 CBA Final Power Point
30/42
CBA of Building a BridgeCBA of Building a Bridge
0
1
2
3
4
5 10
Trip Demand P = 4-.4Q
Millions of trips
Price per trip
Average cost
per trip
$
-
8/7/2019 CBA Final Power Point
31/42
CBA of Building a BridgeCBA of Building a Bridge
Alternative Affected Groups Annual Flow Net Present
Value*
Ferry
(status quo)
Ferry Operators
Ferry Commuters
$5.0
$5.0 (consumer surplus)
$125 M
$125 M
TotalNet Benefit $10.0 $250 M
Bridge Ferry Operator
Bridge Commuters
Taxpayers
$0(profit)
$20 (consumer surplus)
-$5.0 (maintenance cost)
(capital cost)
$0
$500 M
-$125 M
-$85 M
TotalNet Benefit $ 290 M
-
8/7/2019 CBA Final Power Point
32/42
CBA of Building a BridgeCBA of Building a Bridge
0
1
2
3
4
5 10
Trip Demand P = 4-.4Q
Millions of trips
Price per trip
Average cost
per trip
Consumersurplus-ferry
Ferrys profit
$ 5M
$
-
8/7/2019 CBA Final Power Point
33/42
Explanation on FerryExplanation on Ferry
Ferrys annual profit: (P 2.0-AC 1.0)(5M trips)=$ 5M
Commuters benefit=consumer surplus
Consumer surplus is the difference between whatconsumers are willing to pay and the actual price charged
Triangular Area between the demand curve and price line
(1/2) (5M trips) (4.0-2.0)=$ 5M
present value = $5M/4% = $ 125M
-
8/7/2019 CBA Final Power Point
34/42
CBA of Building a BridgeCBA of Building a Bridge
0
1
2
3
4
5 10
Trip Demand P = 4-.4Q
Millions of trips
Price per trip
Average cost
per trip
Consumer
surplus-bridge
$20M
$
-
8/7/2019 CBA Final Power Point
35/42
Explanation on BridgeExplanation on Bridge
Last two are burden to taxpayers; they must foot the
bill for construction and maintenance costs
Because it is toll-free, the bridge generates no
revenue
Consumer surplus = (1/2)(10M trips)($4)=$ 20M
-
8/7/2019 CBA Final Power Point
36/42
CBA of Building a BridgeCBA of Building a Bridge
Alternative Affected Groups Annual Flow Net Present
Value
Ferry
(status quo)
Ferry Operator
Ferry Commuters
$5.0
$5.0 (consumer surplus)
$125 M
$125 M
TotalNet Benefit $10.0 $250 M
Bridge Ferry Operator
Bridge Commuters
Taxpayers
$0(profit)
$20 (consumer surplus)
-$5.0 (maintenance cost)
(capital cost)
$0
$500 M
-$125 M
-$85 M
TotalNet Benefit $ 290 M
The bridge should be built because its projected net benefit
exceeds that of the current ferry operation
-
8/7/2019 CBA Final Power Point
37/42
Decision CriteriaDecision Criteria
-
8/7/2019 CBA Final Power Point
38/42
Sample Case 2Sample Case 2
Should this project be approved? Someone unfamiliar with discounting would say yes,
because after an initial investment of $ 500 the project earns a total of $ 650. Ifdiscounting is omitted, however, the principle of incremental analysis is ignored,
particularly the time value of money.
-
8/7/2019 CBA Final Power Point
39/42
Sample Case 2Sample Case 2
To obtain the net present value (NPV), all future cash flows are discounted to year 0. Using
discount tables (or using calculators) with a 10% interest rate, the discounted or present
values are obtained.
-
8/7/2019 CBA Final Power Point
40/42
Sample Case 2Sample Case 2
-
8/7/2019 CBA Final Power Point
41/42
Sample Case 2Sample Case 2
-
8/7/2019 CBA Final Power Point
42/42
Sample Case 2Sample Case 2