Cavity package T.Saeki BCD meeting 20 Dec 2005. Cavity shape BCD: TESLA shape Pros: small wakefield,...
-
Upload
christiana-bruce -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
2
Transcript of Cavity package T.Saeki BCD meeting 20 Dec 2005. Cavity shape BCD: TESLA shape Pros: small wakefield,...
![Page 1: Cavity package T.Saeki BCD meeting 20 Dec 2005. Cavity shape BCD: TESLA shape Pros: small wakefield, HOM thoroughly investigated single-cell: 43 MV/m.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032707/56649e3f5503460f94b2ff2d/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Cavity package
T.SaekiBCD meeting20 Dec 2005
![Page 2: Cavity package T.Saeki BCD meeting 20 Dec 2005. Cavity shape BCD: TESLA shape Pros: small wakefield, HOM thoroughly investigated single-cell: 43 MV/m.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032707/56649e3f5503460f94b2ff2d/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Cavity shapeBCD: TESLA shape Pros: small wakefield, HOM thoroughly investigated single-cell: 43 MV/m 9-cell: 40 MV/m (Q=10**10) Cavities and modules have operated in TTF. Cons: high Epk/EaccACD1: KEK/DESY low-loss shape Pros: low Hpk/Eacc single-cell: 45-47 MV/m 9-cell: fabricated and tested. Cons: high Epk/Eacc, small aperture ACD2: Cornell Re-entrant shape Pros: low Hpk/Eacc single-cell: 52 MV/m 9-cell: fabrication underway Cons: high Epk/Eacc, HPR problematic
![Page 3: Cavity package T.Saeki BCD meeting 20 Dec 2005. Cavity shape BCD: TESLA shape Pros: small wakefield, HOM thoroughly investigated single-cell: 43 MV/m.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032707/56649e3f5503460f94b2ff2d/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Cavity-shape designs with low Bpeak/Eaccmade the breakthrough.
![Page 4: Cavity package T.Saeki BCD meeting 20 Dec 2005. Cavity shape BCD: TESLA shape Pros: small wakefield, HOM thoroughly investigated single-cell: 43 MV/m.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032707/56649e3f5503460f94b2ff2d/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
![Page 5: Cavity package T.Saeki BCD meeting 20 Dec 2005. Cavity shape BCD: TESLA shape Pros: small wakefield, HOM thoroughly investigated single-cell: 43 MV/m.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032707/56649e3f5503460f94b2ff2d/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
ACD3: Superstructure pairs of 9-cell cavities. (two pairs of 7-cell cavities studied at DESY)
Pros. Cost savings : ½ of input couplers (8000 couplers) Wake-fields are less.
Cons. How to process/test a long assembly (BCP, EP, etc…)
Cavity shape
![Page 6: Cavity package T.Saeki BCD meeting 20 Dec 2005. Cavity shape BCD: TESLA shape Pros: small wakefield, HOM thoroughly investigated single-cell: 43 MV/m.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032707/56649e3f5503460f94b2ff2d/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Cavity material
BCD: Nb fine grain sheet Pros: Best known material Cons: Expensive rolling, cleaning and annealing steps. R&D: Impurity of Ta, how many melts, EBM conditions etc.
ACD1: Large grain /single crystal (Jlab, DESY, Cornell, FNAL) Pros: Simplification of fabrication and processing => cost savings Potential elimination of EP => Only BCP Cons: Little experience R&D: Acceptable yield strength of material after cut from ingot Cutting techinque: wire EDM is slow
ACD2: Nb/Cu clad Pros: Saving Nb material => Cost savings. No EBW at equator, comparable performance to bulk Nb cavity. 3-cell cavity demonstration by DESY. Cons: Contamination risk at welding of endgroup. => Sputterd Nb on Cu with endgroup flanged to cell-structure. Complex cool down (Thermo-current/frozen-in flux)
![Page 7: Cavity package T.Saeki BCD meeting 20 Dec 2005. Cavity shape BCD: TESLA shape Pros: small wakefield, HOM thoroughly investigated single-cell: 43 MV/m.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032707/56649e3f5503460f94b2ff2d/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
![Page 8: Cavity package T.Saeki BCD meeting 20 Dec 2005. Cavity shape BCD: TESLA shape Pros: small wakefield, HOM thoroughly investigated single-cell: 43 MV/m.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032707/56649e3f5503460f94b2ff2d/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Fundamental Material R&DUnderstanding of underlying physics (purity, grain, surface...)1) RF critical magnetic Field Ultimate Eacc is limited by Hpk ~ 185 mT. Theory is still under debate.2) Field emission Eacc > 45 MV/m => Epk > 100 MV/m Control of contamination, clean processing/assemble3) Defects in material Quench below H(RF) < Hpk. Need scanning method for the defects of <10um.4) Q-drop (20 – 25 MV/m) Cryo-loss is large. In-stu baking at ~120 deg. C.(>12 hrs)5) Residual resistance A few n ohms is not on regular basis.
![Page 9: Cavity package T.Saeki BCD meeting 20 Dec 2005. Cavity shape BCD: TESLA shape Pros: small wakefield, HOM thoroughly investigated single-cell: 43 MV/m.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032707/56649e3f5503460f94b2ff2d/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Cavity FabricationBCD: Bulk fine-grained Nb sheet, Machining, deep draw for
ming, Mechanical polishing, pre-cleaning, EBW, inelastic deformation tuning with appropriate intermediate cleaning steps.
Options: 1) fine-grain sheet deep drawing + EBW => spinning deep drawing + EBW => hydro-forming endgroup => Nb film on Cu + flanges 2) large/single grain sheet Wire EDM cut of ingot to form sheet 3)Bulk Nb/Cu clad material deep drawing + EBW => hydro-form Nb/Cu clad pip
e (9-cell + beam-tubes ???)
![Page 10: Cavity package T.Saeki BCD meeting 20 Dec 2005. Cavity shape BCD: TESLA shape Pros: small wakefield, HOM thoroughly investigated single-cell: 43 MV/m.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032707/56649e3f5503460f94b2ff2d/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Cavity FabricationACD1: Hydro-forming of cell-structure (DESY, KEK) Single-cell cavity: 42 MV/m, Q = 10**10 (KEK & DESY) 3-cell cavity : fabricated. Pros: Saving fabrication cost. Nb material reduction by 75%. Adoidance
of machining. Automation. Etc… Cons: Endgroup welding. Contamination of Cu. R&D: Magnetic flux trap by Nb/Cu thrmo-coupling. CARE program in Europe. Bulk Nb seamless 9-cell cavity installation in the cryomodule (200
6)ACD2: Spining (INFN) Single-cell cavity: 40 MV/m (INFN) 9-cell cavity: fabricated. Pros: Saving fabrication costs. Cons: Need removal of fissures by substantial grinding.ACD3: Nb films on Cu for endgroups (KEK) Pros: Successful SC flanging => new type of modularity. Inspection, cl
eaning, assembly separately. Cost savings (Nb and EBW => Cu and brazing)
Cons: Complex shape of endgroup => difficult Nb coating. Additional complexity in SC joint.
![Page 11: Cavity package T.Saeki BCD meeting 20 Dec 2005. Cavity shape BCD: TESLA shape Pros: small wakefield, HOM thoroughly investigated single-cell: 43 MV/m.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032707/56649e3f5503460f94b2ff2d/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Cavity preparationBCD:1)Leak check, mechanical checks, inspection2)Freq. tuning, field flatness3)Cleaning4)Damage layer removal5)Furnace treatment6)Final freq. tuning, field flatness7)Final surface preoparation8)Final cleaning9)Bake-out at 120 -130 deg C.10)Low-power acceptance tests11)Tank-welding12)Assembly for high-power operation13)High-power test
![Page 12: Cavity package T.Saeki BCD meeting 20 Dec 2005. Cavity shape BCD: TESLA shape Pros: small wakefield, HOM thoroughly investigated single-cell: 43 MV/m.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032707/56649e3f5503460f94b2ff2d/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Cavity preparation
ACD1: post-purification at 1400 deg C with Ti.
ACD2: Eliminate outside etching
ACD3: Hot water rinsing
ACD4: Tumbling/barrel polishing to reduce amount of EP necessary (KEK)
ACD5: Dry-ice cleaning instead of HPR (DESY)
ACD6: Air baking out instead of in-situ vacuum bake at 120 – 130 deg C.