Cassini at Saturn, use of windowed ramped uplink
Click here to load reader
-
Upload
david-alan-tyner -
Category
Technology
-
view
473 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Cassini at Saturn, use of windowed ramped uplink
Interplanetary Network Directorate
1Deep Space Network Operations & Maintenance
Analysis of Possible use of Non-Ramped Uplinks,
using example of Cassini Rhea Encounter
David TynerNOPE
11 Jan 2006
Interplanetary Network Directorate
2Deep Space Network Operations & Maintenance
• Actual Rhea encounter used ramped predicts– Uplinking used a time history of Doppler compensated XAs
– Each Uplink Frequency in time, arrives at S/C at near to BLF
– Provides Minimal Stress on S/C transponder PLL
– Guarantees Minimal Risk of recovery if TXR were to Glitch (I/L shut off), as the
transponder is always ‘sitting’ right at XA or BLF
– Transfers (handovers between DSSs) could potentially occur without slewing
above and below BLF, but in practice a sweep from above, through, and
continuing past where BLF is, are used to guaranteed continuation of 2-way
– Negative impacts to Radio Science [ Tuned XA(t) compared to fixed TSF
frequency ]
• Uplink Tuning adds additional frequency instabilities and phase noise (compared to
TSF)
• Additional post-processing is needed to remove effect of ramped uplink
Ramped vs. Non-Ramped
Interplanetary Network Directorate
3Deep Space Network Operations & Maintenance
• Analysis of Rhea encounter, if had used non-ramped Uplinking– Uplinking starts using a single Doppler compensated XA, then ramps to TSF
– The single TSF Frequency (ea. DSS), arrives at S/C at many different values (not at BLF)
– Provides Increasing Stress on S/C transponder PLL, depending on Doppler Profile
– Has increased Risk of 2-way recovery if TXR were to Glitch (I/L shut off), as the transponder
has been pulled substantially away from BLF
– Transfers still occur at BLF, but require a larger sweep from above, through, and continuing
past where BLF is, as both DSSs start at their individual TSFs (to a “common” XA, BLF)
– Reduced impacts to Radio Science [ fixed TSF frequency compared to Tuned XA(t) ]
• Fixed TSF uplink provides maximum frequency stabilities and reduced phase noise
• Additional post-processing is not needed (there is no tuning nor effect of ramped uplinks)
Ramped vs. Non-Ramped
• Closest approach (Gravity well ∆v/∆t) forces causes XA-TSF to increase● Larger differences between XAMAX and XAMIN , generate an “average” TSF further Doppler curve
● Techniques can be used to reduce the differences between XA(t) and individual TSFs● Restrict Predict duration to shorter periods, but still include enough for transfer between DSSs (min overlap)
● Tune from TSF back to XA, Glitch uplink to load new PDX, which so loose 2-way (and Doppler)
Interplanetary Network Directorate
4Deep Space Network Operations & Maintenance
• Graphical Analysis if had used exactly same predicts, but had used non-ramped TSF technique (“BLF” at transfer between DSSs)
– See next page (5)
• TSF-BLF for DSS-34 is 49 kHz
• TSF-BLF for DSS-63 is 106 kHz
• Graphical Analysis if had Revised predict sets for minimal overlap
– See pages (6-7)
• TSF-BLF for DSS-34 is 25 kHz
• TSF-BLF for DSS-63 is 53 kHz
Ramped vs. Non-Ramped
• Drop Lock approach, enforcing a maximum deviation from BLF● See pages (8-11)● Reduces stress on transponder PLL● Loss of Ranging data is severe for Cassini’s RTLT
Interplanetary Network Directorate
5Deep Space Network Operations & Maintenance
XFR atT0 = 2245z
TSF34 = 7174.510 MHz
TSF63 = 7174.660 MHz
TR MAX = (150 Hz/s) * (3600 s/hr) = 540 kHz/hr
“BLF” = 7174.559 MHz
TSF – XA Difference= 49 kHz
TSF – XA Difference= 106 kHz
Uplink Transfer DSS-34 to DSS-63
Nominal Non-Ramped Uplink Transfer at Closest Approach
Interplanetary Network Directorate
6Deep Space Network Operations & Maintenance
TR MAX = (150 Hz/s) * (3600 s/hr) = 540 kHz/hr
By Shortening PDX Duration, We Reduce the XAMAX - XAMIN Difference,
which brings TSFs closer to Doppler Curve
“Improved” Non-Ramped Uplink Transfer at Closest Approach
TSF34 = 7174.535 MHz
TSF63 = 7174.611 MHz
XFR atT0 = 2245z
“BLF” = 7174.559 MHz
TSF – XA Difference= 25 kHz
TSF – XA Difference= 53 kHz
Uplink Transfer DSS-34 to DSS-63
Interplanetary Network Directorate
7Deep Space Network Operations & Maintenance
Interplanetary Network Directorate
8Deep Space Network Operations & Maintenance
XFR atT0 = 2245z
TSF34 = 7174.535 MHz
TR MAX = (150 Hz/s) * (3600 s/hr) = 540 kHz/hr
XFR atT0 = 0550z
TSF63 = 7174.611 MHz
“BLF” = 7174.686 MHz
75 kHz
95 kHz
TSF14 = 7174.781 MHz
Interplanetary Network Directorate
9Deep Space Network Operations & Maintenance
TSF34 = 7174.535 MHz
TR MAX = (150 Hz/s) * (3600 s/hr) = 540 kHz/hr
2nd GDSCC PDX loaded to
Restrict < 50 kHz
“BLF” = 7174.691 MHz
50 kHz
50 kHz
TSF14 = 7174.781 MHz
“BLF” = 7174.611 MHz
TSF14 = 7174.661 MHz
LOSS OF UPINK, toLOAD PDX
TSF14 = 7174.611 MHz1st ORIGINAL
2nd new PDX view period
Interplanetary Network Directorate
10Deep Space Network Operations & Maintenance
Windowed Non-Ramped Uplinks
T0
331 / 0230
0430 0630 0830 1030 1230 1430 1630
T0+ OWLT
= TOWLT +2 +4 +6 +8 +10 +12 +14
DOWNLINK
RNG OK
U/L PDX Load Glitch,
Loss of data in D/L “Pipeline”
NEW RNG cycle
U/L PDX Load Glitch,
Loss of data in D/L “Pipeline”
NEW RNG cycle
UPLINK
No RNG
No RNG