Cassini at Saturn, use of windowed ramped uplink

10

Click here to load reader

description

Download and use Slideshow mode to view the slides, as that's where the magic of animation moves the frame elements around to illustrate the inner workings? JPL / NASA Deep Space Network Telemetry

Transcript of Cassini at Saturn, use of windowed ramped uplink

Page 1: Cassini at Saturn, use of windowed ramped uplink

Interplanetary Network Directorate

1Deep Space Network Operations & Maintenance

Analysis of Possible use of Non-Ramped Uplinks,

using example of Cassini Rhea Encounter

David TynerNOPE

11 Jan 2006

Page 2: Cassini at Saturn, use of windowed ramped uplink

Interplanetary Network Directorate

2Deep Space Network Operations & Maintenance

• Actual Rhea encounter used ramped predicts– Uplinking used a time history of Doppler compensated XAs

– Each Uplink Frequency in time, arrives at S/C at near to BLF

– Provides Minimal Stress on S/C transponder PLL

– Guarantees Minimal Risk of recovery if TXR were to Glitch (I/L shut off), as the

transponder is always ‘sitting’ right at XA or BLF

– Transfers (handovers between DSSs) could potentially occur without slewing

above and below BLF, but in practice a sweep from above, through, and

continuing past where BLF is, are used to guaranteed continuation of 2-way

– Negative impacts to Radio Science [ Tuned XA(t) compared to fixed TSF

frequency ]

• Uplink Tuning adds additional frequency instabilities and phase noise (compared to

TSF)

• Additional post-processing is needed to remove effect of ramped uplink

Ramped vs. Non-Ramped

Page 3: Cassini at Saturn, use of windowed ramped uplink

Interplanetary Network Directorate

3Deep Space Network Operations & Maintenance

• Analysis of Rhea encounter, if had used non-ramped Uplinking– Uplinking starts using a single Doppler compensated XA, then ramps to TSF

– The single TSF Frequency (ea. DSS), arrives at S/C at many different values (not at BLF)

– Provides Increasing Stress on S/C transponder PLL, depending on Doppler Profile

– Has increased Risk of 2-way recovery if TXR were to Glitch (I/L shut off), as the transponder

has been pulled substantially away from BLF

– Transfers still occur at BLF, but require a larger sweep from above, through, and continuing

past where BLF is, as both DSSs start at their individual TSFs (to a “common” XA, BLF)

– Reduced impacts to Radio Science [ fixed TSF frequency compared to Tuned XA(t) ]

• Fixed TSF uplink provides maximum frequency stabilities and reduced phase noise

• Additional post-processing is not needed (there is no tuning nor effect of ramped uplinks)

Ramped vs. Non-Ramped

• Closest approach (Gravity well ∆v/∆t) forces causes XA-TSF to increase● Larger differences between XAMAX and XAMIN , generate an “average” TSF further Doppler curve

● Techniques can be used to reduce the differences between XA(t) and individual TSFs● Restrict Predict duration to shorter periods, but still include enough for transfer between DSSs (min overlap)

● Tune from TSF back to XA, Glitch uplink to load new PDX, which so loose 2-way (and Doppler)

Page 4: Cassini at Saturn, use of windowed ramped uplink

Interplanetary Network Directorate

4Deep Space Network Operations & Maintenance

• Graphical Analysis if had used exactly same predicts, but had used non-ramped TSF technique (“BLF” at transfer between DSSs)

– See next page (5)

• TSF-BLF for DSS-34 is 49 kHz

• TSF-BLF for DSS-63 is 106 kHz

• Graphical Analysis if had Revised predict sets for minimal overlap

– See pages (6-7)

• TSF-BLF for DSS-34 is 25 kHz

• TSF-BLF for DSS-63 is 53 kHz

Ramped vs. Non-Ramped

• Drop Lock approach, enforcing a maximum deviation from BLF● See pages (8-11)● Reduces stress on transponder PLL● Loss of Ranging data is severe for Cassini’s RTLT

Page 5: Cassini at Saturn, use of windowed ramped uplink

Interplanetary Network Directorate

5Deep Space Network Operations & Maintenance

XFR atT0 = 2245z

TSF34 = 7174.510 MHz

TSF63 = 7174.660 MHz

TR MAX = (150 Hz/s) * (3600 s/hr) = 540 kHz/hr

“BLF” = 7174.559 MHz

TSF – XA Difference= 49 kHz

TSF – XA Difference= 106 kHz

Uplink Transfer DSS-34 to DSS-63

Nominal Non-Ramped Uplink Transfer at Closest Approach

Page 6: Cassini at Saturn, use of windowed ramped uplink

Interplanetary Network Directorate

6Deep Space Network Operations & Maintenance

TR MAX = (150 Hz/s) * (3600 s/hr) = 540 kHz/hr

By Shortening PDX Duration, We Reduce the XAMAX - XAMIN Difference,

which brings TSFs closer to Doppler Curve

“Improved” Non-Ramped Uplink Transfer at Closest Approach

TSF34 = 7174.535 MHz

TSF63 = 7174.611 MHz

XFR atT0 = 2245z

“BLF” = 7174.559 MHz

TSF – XA Difference= 25 kHz

TSF – XA Difference= 53 kHz

Uplink Transfer DSS-34 to DSS-63

Page 7: Cassini at Saturn, use of windowed ramped uplink

Interplanetary Network Directorate

7Deep Space Network Operations & Maintenance

Page 8: Cassini at Saturn, use of windowed ramped uplink

Interplanetary Network Directorate

8Deep Space Network Operations & Maintenance

XFR atT0 = 2245z

TSF34 = 7174.535 MHz

TR MAX = (150 Hz/s) * (3600 s/hr) = 540 kHz/hr

XFR atT0 = 0550z

TSF63 = 7174.611 MHz

“BLF” = 7174.686 MHz

75 kHz

95 kHz

TSF14 = 7174.781 MHz

Page 9: Cassini at Saturn, use of windowed ramped uplink

Interplanetary Network Directorate

9Deep Space Network Operations & Maintenance

TSF34 = 7174.535 MHz

TR MAX = (150 Hz/s) * (3600 s/hr) = 540 kHz/hr

2nd GDSCC PDX loaded to

Restrict < 50 kHz

“BLF” = 7174.691 MHz

50 kHz

50 kHz

TSF14 = 7174.781 MHz

“BLF” = 7174.611 MHz

TSF14 = 7174.661 MHz

LOSS OF UPINK, toLOAD PDX

TSF14 = 7174.611 MHz1st ORIGINAL

2nd new PDX view period

Page 10: Cassini at Saturn, use of windowed ramped uplink

Interplanetary Network Directorate

10Deep Space Network Operations & Maintenance

Windowed Non-Ramped Uplinks

T0

331 / 0230

0430 0630 0830 1030 1230 1430 1630

T0+ OWLT

= TOWLT +2 +4 +6 +8 +10 +12 +14

DOWNLINK

RNG OK

U/L PDX Load Glitch,

Loss of data in D/L “Pipeline”

NEW RNG cycle

U/L PDX Load Glitch,

Loss of data in D/L “Pipeline”

NEW RNG cycle

UPLINK

No RNG

No RNG