Cases in Oblicon
2
CASES: (CONTRACTS) 00000011. GABRIEL v. MONTE DE PIEDAD 71 PHIL 497; 2. PAKISTAN INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES v. OPLE 190 SCRA 90; 3. SO PING BUN vs. CA 314 SCRA 616; 4. LAGON v. CA 453 SCRA 616; 5.PROFESSIONAL ACADEMIC PLANS, INC. ET. AL v. CRISOSTOMO, 453 SCRA 342; 6. DKC HOLDINGS CORP v. CA 329 SCRA 666; 7. MARMONT RESORT v. GUIANG 168 SCRA 373; 8. MANDARIN VILLA v. CA 257 538; 9. SANCHEZ v RIGOS 45 SCRA 368; 10. MALBAROSA v. CA 402 SCRA 168; 11. SAN LORENZO DEVELOPMENT CORP v. CA 449 SCRA 99; 12. MMDA v. JANCOM, GR NO. 147465, JANUARY 30, 2002; 13. LUSTAN v. CA 266 SCRA 663; 14. KATIPUNAN v. KATIPUNAN 375 SCRA 199; 15. LEONARDO v. CA 438 SCRA 201; 16. LEE v. CA 201 SCRA 405; 17. GERALDEZ v. CA 230 SCRA 320; 18. RURAL BANK OF STA. MARIA v. CA 314 SCRA 255; 19. TRINIDAD V. IAC 204 SCRA 524; 20. SONGCO v. SELLNER, 37 PHIL 254; and 21. BRAGANZA v. VILLA ABRILLE, 105 PHIL 456. Additional Cases: 1. SUNTAY v. CA 251 SCRA 430 2. PANGADIL ET. AL. v. CFI; G.R. No. L-32437, August 31, 1982 3. JLT AGRO INC. v. BALANSAG, G.R. No. 141882, March 11, 2005 4. SPS BUENAVENTURA v. CA 416 SCRA 263 5. HERNAEZ v. DELOS ANGELES 27 SCRA 1276 6. RESUENA v. CA G.R. No. 128338, March 28, 2005 7. OIL AND NATURAL GAS COMMISSION v. CA G.R. NO. 114323, July 23, 1998 8. SPS RIGOR v. CONSOLIDATED ORIX LEASING AND FINANCE CORP G.R. No. 136423, August 20, 2002 9. CHUA v. CA G.R. No. 119255, April 9, 2003 10. RIZAL COMMERCIAL BANKING CORPORATION v. CA G.R. No. 133107, March 25, 1999 11. GACOS v. CA G.R. Nos. 85962-63, August 3, 1992 12. GARCIA v. BISAYA 97 PHIL 609 13. BENTIR v. LEANDE 330 SCRA 591 14. QUIROS v. ARJONA G. R. No. 158901, March 9, 2004 15. ATILANO v. ATILANO 28 SCRA 2232 16. CARANTES v. CA 76 SCRA 514 17. SARMING v. DY 383 SCRA 131
description
Obligations and contracts cases
Transcript of Cases in Oblicon
CASES: (CONTRACTS)00000011. GABRIEL v. MONTE DE PIEDAD 71 PHIL 497;2. PAKISTAN INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES v. OPLE 190 SCRA 90;3. SO PING BN v!. CA 314 SCRA "1";4. LAGON v. CA 4#3 SCRA "1";#.PRO$ESSIONAL ACADEMIC PLANS% INC. ET. AL v. CRISOSTOMO% 4#3 SCRA 342;". DKC HOLDINGS CORP v. CA 329 SCRA """;7. MARMONT RESORT v. GIANG 1"& SCRA 373;&. MANDARIN 'ILLA v. CA 2#7 #3&;9. SANCHE( v RIGOS 4# SCRA 3"&;10. MALBAROSA v. CA 402 SCRA 1"&;11. SAN LOREN(O DE'ELOPMENT CORP v. CA 449 SCRA 99;12. MMDA v. )ANCOM% GR NO. 1474"#% )ANAR* 30% 2002;13. LSTAN v. CA 2"" SCRA ""3;14. KATIPNAN v. KATIPNAN 37# SCRA 199;1#. LEONARDO v. CA 43& SCRA 201;1". LEE v. CA 201 SCRA 40#;17. GERALDE( v. CA 230 SCRA 320;1&. RRAL BANK O$ STA. MARIA v. CA 314 SCRA 2##;19. TRINIDAD '. IAC 204 SCRA #24;20. SONGCO v. SELLNER% 37 PHIL 2#4; +,-21. BRAGAN(A v. 'ILLA ABRILLE% 10# PHIL 4#".A--./.0,+1 C+!2!:1. SNTA* v. CA 2#1 SCRA 4302. PANGADIL ET. AL. v. C$I; G.R. N0. L332437% A454!/ 31% 19&23. )LT AGRO INC. v. BALANSAG% G.R. N0. 141&&2% M+678 11% 200#4. SPS BENA'ENTRA v. CA 41" SCRA 2"3#. HERNAE( v. DELOS ANGELES 27 SCRA 127"". RESENA v. CA G.R. N0. 12&33&% M+678 2&% 200#7. OIL AND NATRAL GAS COMMISSION v. CA G.R. NO. 114323% )419 23% 199&&. SPS RIGOR v. CONSOLIDATED ORI: LEASING AND $INANCE CORP G.R. N0. 13"423% A454!/ 20% 20029. CHA v. CA G.R. N0. 1192##% A;6.1 9% 200310. RI(AL COMMERCIAL BANKING CORPORATION v. CA G.R. N0. 133107% M+678 2#% 199911. GACOS v. CA G.R. N0!. "23"3% A454!/ 3% 199212. GARCIA v. BISA*A 97 PHIL "0913. BENTIR v. LEANDE 330 SCRA #9114.
