Case Study Group 5 - Wikipedia

download Case Study Group 5 - Wikipedia

of 24

Transcript of Case Study Group 5 - Wikipedia

  • 8/17/2019 Case Study Group 5 - Wikipedia

    1/24

      Wikipedia: Who’s Ed

     Amin Shalikaran CGA150094

    Gwee Jo-Ee CGA150100

    Mohd Sayuti Shaari CGA140032

     Yeap Ming Yee CGA150024

    CASESTUDY |

       G   R   O   U   P   5

  • 8/17/2019 Case Study Group 5 - Wikipedia

    2/24

    nt!od"#tion

  • 8/17/2019 Case Study Group 5 - Wikipedia

    3/24

    What is Wikipedia?

    Wikipedia is a multilingual, web-based, free-content en

    project supported by the Wikimedia Foundation.

    Based on a model of openly editable content.

    Wikipedia is written collaboratively by largely anonymo

    volunteers who write without pay.

  • 8/17/2019 Case Study Group 5 - Wikipedia

    4/24

    $o% &ig is Wikipedia?

    374mvisitors 

    70k contrib

    More than

    38m articlescontributed

    In 290languages

    6m articlesin nglish

    800 ne!articles daily

  • 8/17/2019 Case Study Group 5 - Wikipedia

    5/24

    O"! Case St"d'

    Griffith !al tech computation " neural systems graduate student# created a investigate the edits in Wikipedia.

    $is program lead to the following findings%

    &' paragraphs has been deleted from an article of (lectronic )oting that

    of *iebold+s machines.

    oliticians are the freuent editors. Walmart make changes to improve its image

    (on /obile deleted information about its non-payment of damages to 0

     3laska fishermen.

    *isney+s registered computer deleted the information critical of the comp

    rights management software.

  • 8/17/2019 Case Study Group 5 - Wikipedia

    6/24

    Case St"d'("estions

  • 8/17/2019 Case Study Group 5 - Wikipedia

    7/24

    Do 'o" "se Wikipedia )o! 'o"!

    !esea!#h? Wh' o! %h' not?

     3s we have seen, Wikipedia is the online, peer4produced encyclopedia, is one of the

    discussed topics on campuses today. /uch of the academic debate turns on issues a

    5are student allow to use Wikipedia for citation or not65

     3ll lecturers don+t accept the Wikipedia as a resource for student researches, becaus

    trust to Wikipedia. $owever, in some survey is revealed a big part of student use of W

    continue we see why and how these parts of student use of Wikipedia6

    "

  • 8/17/2019 Case Study Group 5 - Wikipedia

    8/24

    *ig"!e +: $o% o)ten do s

    Wikipedia d"!ing the #o

    !esea!#h p!o#ess?

    7n this paper, we present f

    from a survey of 8.9. colle

    students on si campuses

    spring of 122:. by 3lison ;

    and /ichael B. (isenberg

    #ource$ %&ead ' isenberg(

    20"0)

  • 8/17/2019 Case Study Group 5 - Wikipedia

    9/24

    *ig"!e .: At %

    the !esea!#h p

    is Wikipedia "

    st"dents?

    #ource$ %&ead ' isenberg(20"0)

  • 8/17/2019 Case Study Group 5 - Wikipedia

    10/24

    *ig"!e 0

    st"dent

    "se Wik!e-ated !

    9tudents

    used Wi

    variety o

    than any

    < in &2 srespond

    percent#

    they wen

    to Wikipe

    backgro

    or a sum

    topic.#ource$ %&ead ' isenberg(

    20"0)

  • 8/17/2019 Case Study Group 5 - Wikipedia

    11/24

    Othe! Reasons %h' Wikipedia is "sed

    Wikipedia is a starting point for research

    Wikipedia is great for getting a general

    understanding of a subject before you dive

    into it

    9imple narrative that gives you a grasp

    !an point you in the right dire

    $elp when 7 have no idea whresearch paper 

    7t is a good presearch tool

    9ome uick information on a

  • 8/17/2019 Case Study Group 5 - Wikipedia

    12/24

    Wh' Wikipedia sho"-d not /e "sed in

    !esea!#h

    Gene!a- en#'#-opedia 4 not citable information.

    Anon'1it' 4 often there is no way to trace the editor.

    A#ade1i# !igo! 4 contents might not meet the academic standards.

    ndi2id"a-s %ith agenda 4 lopsided articles to support or disagree with certain

    3anda-s 4 malicious entries created on purpose

    T!"st iss"e 4 articles are written and edited by any registered user.

  • 8/17/2019 Case Study Group 5 - Wikipedia

    13/24

    What did the 4i11' Wa-es said?

    No, I don't think peopleshould ite it , and I don'tthink people should citeBritannica, either... Peopleshouldn't be citing

    encyclopedias in the frst place. Wikipedia and otherencyclopedias should...givegood, solid backgroundinormation to inorm yourstudies or a deeper level.

    +

  • 8/17/2019 Case Study Group 5 - Wikipedia

    14/24

    $a2e 'o" e2e! 1ade a #hange to a Wikipedia ent!'? ) 'o

    %e!e to see an o/2io"s 1istake 5in 'o"! opinion67 %o"-d

    'o" take the ti1e to #hange it? Wh' o! %h' not?

    Wikipedia is one of the open source software, using Co--e#ti2e nte--igen#e concept.

    Wikipedia is the most popular website that been introduced by Google during research

     3 good starting point for researching certain topic before further searching using reliab

    7f the information is wrong, it will lead to wrong interpretations by other users.

    =o date, there are more than ' million article specifically in (nglish version and 1<

    users.

    We will take time to correct the article

    2

  • 8/17/2019 Case Study Group 5 - Wikipedia

    15/24

    Co--e#ti2e nte--igen#e

    Form of networking enabled by the rise of communications techwhich has enabled interactivity and users generating their own c

    dictionary.com#

    ,ollectiveIntelligen

    ce

    -iscoverand sharene! ideas

    Im.rove/orecastin

    geectiven

    ess

    1ugmentskills anddistribute!orkload

    #ource$ IM In

  • 8/17/2019 Case Study Group 5 - Wikipedia

    16/24

    An'one #an edit ent!ies on Wikipedia8 Do 'o" see this

    as a #"!se o! as a /-essing? E9p-ain8

    7naccuracies.

    Wiki wars.

    /ischievous pranksters insert

    offensive content.

     3llowing knowledge to beon, refined and policed.

     3llowing anyone to edit ashare knowledge

    1 ,urse 1 lessing1 lessing

    3

  • 8/17/2019 Case Study Group 5 - Wikipedia

    17/24

    na##"!a#ies?

    7t is in the nature of an ever-changingwork like Wikipedia that, while somearticles are of the highest uality ofscholarship, others are admittedlycomplete rubbish.

    Wikipedia fully aware of what it isand what it isn+t. 3lso, because somearticles may contain errors, we shouldnot use Wikipedia to make criticaldecisions.

     3rticles in Wikipedia are not signecontributors are unpaid volunteers

    Whether you claim to be a tenuredyour real name, prefer to remain por contribute without registering, y

    arguments will be judged on their

    Wikipedia reuire that verifiable sofor all significant claims, and Wikippermit editors to publici>e their peconclusions when writing articles.

     3ll editors must follow a neutral pomust only collect relevant opinions

    traced to reliable sources

    Wikipedia do not expect

    people to completely trustthem.

    Wikipedia is only a collect

  • 8/17/2019 Case Study Group 5 - Wikipedia

    18/24

    is#hie2o"s p!ankste!s inse!t o))ensi2e #ontent?

     You cannot actually change anything in Wikipedia

    7t@s only possible to @add@ to it, not change it.

    Wikipedia is a database with a memory designed to last as long as we can make it last.

     

     3n article you read today is just the current draft? every time it is changed, we keep both the ne

    copy of the old version.

    =his allows us to compare different versions or restore older ones as needed. 3s a reader, you

    the specific copy of an article you are looking at.

    ;ust link to the article using the 5ermanent link5 at the bottom of the left menu, and your link w

    page whose contents will never change. $owever, if an article is deleted, your permanent link

    for administrators.#

  • 8/17/2019 Case Study Group 5 - Wikipedia

    19/24

    Wiki Wa!s?

    Well-written and educational Afeatured articles+ that turn

    that way because do>ens of people contributed their e

    on common and esoteric subjects, struggled to reach

    consensus succeeding in most cases#.

  • 8/17/2019 Case Study Group 5 - Wikipedia

    20/24

    onclusio

    n

  • 8/17/2019 Case Study Group 5 - Wikipedia

    21/24

    Con#-"sion

    Wikipedia relies heavilyon community editors Will global mobile trethreaten it+s survival

  • 8/17/2019 Case Study Group 5 - Wikipedia

    22/24

    Con#-"sion

    Multimedia5ca.ahandsets /or aud

    video and .hoto/rom the cro!d

    To understand theusers o Wikipedia and

    ho it can stayrelevant 

    ,onvince mobile net!orko.erators to !aive data char

    /or users accessing iki.edia

    their handsets

  • 8/17/2019 Case Study Group 5 - Wikipedia

    23/24

    Re)e!en#es

    $ead, 3., " (isenberg, /. 12&2#. $ow today+s college students use Wikipedia for course-related research F

    &' 0#

    !oomer, 3. 12&0, /ay &0#. =he Guardian. etrieved /arch 1

  • 8/17/2019 Case Study Group 5 - Wikipedia

    24/24

    ("estion ; Ans%e