Case Studies Flicker Problems in Steel Plant Caused by Interharmonics

download Case Studies Flicker Problems in Steel Plant Caused by Interharmonics

of 13

Transcript of Case Studies Flicker Problems in Steel Plant Caused by Interharmonics

  • 7/28/2019 Case Studies Flicker Problems in Steel Plant Caused by Interharmonics

    1/13

    Case study

    Michle De WitteLaborelec

    December 2007

    16.00

    14.00

    12.00

    10.00

    8.00

    6.00

    4.00

    2.00

    0.00

    0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400

    Frequency

    Uih(%)

    Powe

    rQuality

    Power Quality

    Flicker problems in a steel plantcaused by Interharmonics

  • 7/28/2019 Case Studies Flicker Problems in Steel Plant Caused by Interharmonics

    2/13

    2

    http://www.leonardo-energy.org

    Power Quality

    Introduction

    A steel manuacturing plant was experiencing a ficker problem. Lights in the o ce areas o the plant were oten

    fickering, aecting productivity and creating an irritating nuisance or employees.

    A Power Quality consultant was called in to investigate the case. He carried out measurements to gain a better

    understanding o the problem and to enable him to identiy the source o the ficker phenomenon and the operating

    conditions in which it occurred. Once this inormation in hand, he was able to propose an appropriate solution.

    1. Problem description

    1.1 Flicker

    Flicker is a particular deviation rom the sinusoidal waveorm o an electric voltage. It is usually experienced through

    the fickering o lights. Two types o ficker exist:

    1) Normal ficker is caused by repeated rms voltage variations. It can be measured using a fickermeter1.

    2) Flicker provoked by interharmonic voltages2

    . An interharmonic voltage has a requency that is a non-integermultiple o the undamental requency o 50 Hz. This kind o ficker cannot be measured by means o

    a normal fickermeter.

    Not all interharmonic voltages necessarily cause visible ficker in all types o lighting equipment. Some equipment

    is more sensitive to certain interharmonic requencies than others. Sensitivity curves or various types o equipment

    can be drawn based on experiments. An example representing the curves o fuorescent and compact fuorescent

    lamps is given in Figure 1.

    16.00

    14.00

    12.00

    10.00

    8.00

    6.00

    4.00

    2.00

    0.00

    0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400

    Frequency

    Uih(%)

    Figure 1: Sensitivity curves or various types o lighting equipment

    1 IEC 61000-4-15 electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC) Part 4: Testing and measurement techniques Section 15: Flickermeter Functional and design specications2 Light ficker caused by interharmonics; 8th International Power Quality Applications Conerence; 1998; Cape Town, South-Arica

  • 7/28/2019 Case Studies Flicker Problems in Steel Plant Caused by Interharmonics

    3/13

    3

    http://www.leonardo-energy.org

    Power Quality

    1.2 Problems encountered

    Normal ficker

    The fickermeter indicated a relatively high level o

    normal ficker on the 30 kV bus bar. This ficker was

    traced and ound to originate at loads at the higher

    voltage level (150 kV), which included an electric

    urnace. However it was demonstrated that this

    normal ficker measured on the 30 kV busbar resulted

    in a ficker that was hardly visible at the lower

    voltage to which the o ce lights were connected.

    Consequently, the normal ficker provoked by the

    electric urnace could not be the sole reason or

    the fickering o the lights in the o ces.

    Flicker by interharmonics

    The 30 kV bus bar also connected a rolling mill.

    To improve the cos, capacitor banks and their

    corresponding lters are installed on the 30 kV

    net. There were lters or the th, seventh, and

    eleventh harmonic currents. These were passive

    lters that can be operated separately. Such lters

    create a low-impedance circuit or one specic

    requency, but also create anti-resonance at

    requencies adjoining the tuning requency.

    This act made it likely that the cause o the ficker

    problem was in the high interharmonic voltages provoked by the interaction between the rolling mill and the various

    lter passes. In other words, high harmonic impedance in the lters at requencies that also show up in the current

    harmonics o the load proved to be the origin o this ficker problem.

    2. Measurements and simulations

    2.1 Theory

    When a capacitor bank is installed to improve the power actor o the load, a combination o lters and inductors

    is oten installed to attenuate certain harmonics. The lter creates a series resonance that attenuates a certain

    harmonic. The inductor, installed in series with the capacitor, creates a parallel resonance at a lower requency than

    the ltered harmonic requency. The combination o the series resonance rom the lter and the parallel resonance

    obtained by the inductor, leads to the curve shown in the gure entitled Series + parallel resonance.

    ()

    Zgh

    Xh

    Xch

    Xc

    X

    h1 hr h h

    ()

    Xgh

    XfhXgh

    Xh

    Xsh

    Xch

    ()

    Zgh

    Xch XIc

    R

    hr h

    Figure 3: a) Series resonance b) Parallel resonance c) Series + parallel resonance

    I several lters are installed, each tuned to another harmonic requency, there is a cascade o these types o curves.

    There are several requencies or which the harmonic impedance is (nearly) zero and several corresponding requencies

    or which the impedance tends to innity. An example o such a curve is shown in Figure 4.

    Figure 2: Electrical scheme o the in-stallation

    45/66 MVAUsc = 14%

    150 kV/32.86 kV

    4800 kvar

    R = 10 Ohm

    L = 0.063 mH

    45/66 MVAUsc = 14%

    150 kV/32.86 kV

    4800 kvar

    R = 10 Ohm

    L = 0.063 mH

    Rolling

    millFinishing train with 6 passes

    M1 M2 M3 M4 M5 M6

    Filter

    H5

    Filter

    H7

    Filter

    H11

  • 7/28/2019 Case Studies Flicker Problems in Steel Plant Caused by Interharmonics

    4/13

    4

    http://www.leonardo-energy.org

    Power Quality

    h

    Xgh

    Xh

    Xh

    Figure 4 : Diferent lters in parallel

    2.2 Network modelling and simulations

    To veriy the theory o the anti-resonances, a simulation o the network was set up to examine the harmonic impedance

    o the system. The simulation was carried out or three confgurations:

    1) Filters or h5, h7, and h11 switched on (hereater called frst flter confguration)

    2) Filters or h5 and h7 switched on (second flter confguration)

    3) Filter or h5 switched on (third flter confguration)

    The principal results can be seen in the ollowing graphs.

    0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200

    Hz

    5

    4.5

    4

    3.5

    3

    2.5

    2

    1.5

    1

    0.5

    0

    Zpu

    Base: 100 MVA / 30 kV

    Zohm = Zpu

    9

    Harmonic impedance with the flters or H5, H7 and H11 in service

    Figure 5: Harmonic impedance with three lters (h5, h7 and h11) switched on

    The frst graph (Figure 5) shows the harmonic impedance o the 30 kV bus bar when the three flters are switched on.

    One can observe that impedance is (nearly) zero at three requencies: 250 Hz (h5), at 350 Hz (h7), and at 550 Hz (h11).

    These are the tuning requencies o the flters. The flters behave as short-circuits or currents at these requencies.

    An inherent characteristic o a tuning requency is that it provokes an anti-resonance requency just below the tuning

    requency. In this case these anti-resonance requencies are 180 Hz, 330 Hz, and 485 Hz respectively.

  • 7/28/2019 Case Studies Flicker Problems in Steel Plant Caused by Interharmonics

    5/13

    5

    http://www.leonardo-energy.org

    Power Quality

    0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200

    Hz

    6

    5

    4

    3

    2

    1

    0

    Zpu

    Base: 100 MVA / 30 kVZohm + Zpu

    9

    Harmonic impedance with the flters or H5 and H7 in service

    0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200

    6

    5

    4

    3

    2

    1

    0

    Base: 100 MVA / 30 kV

    Zohm = Zpu

    9

    Harmonic impedance with the flter or H5 in service

    Zpu

    Hz

    Figure 6: Harmonic impedance Figure 7: Harmonic impedance with two lters

    with one lter (h5) switched on (h5 & h7) switched on

    Figure 6 shows the harmonic impedance with two flters switched on. The anti-resonance requencies in this case are

    185 Hz and 330 Hz. This shows that the anti-resonance can shit depending upon the number o flters switched on.

    Figure 7 shows the harmonic impedance with only the flter or the fth harmonic switched on. The anti-resonance

    lies at 190 Hz.

    The dierence o 10 Hz in the anti-resonance requency can be signifcant. I any o the interharmonics produced by

    the rolling mill should coincide or almost coincide with one or more o these anti-resonance requencies, this

    will result in rather high voltage components at these requencies. This can cause icker and its consequent nuisance.

    Thus, when setting anti-harmonic flters on or o, the harmonic impedance o the entire system changes and icker

    can be provoked in one or more o the confgurations. Attention must be drawn to the act that the presence o other

    signifcant loads or other changes in the network confguration can also impact harmonic impedance and lead to

    icker.

    2.3 Measurements

    During the frst measurement campaign, the flter or the fth harmonic was switched on while those or the seventh

    and the eleventh harmonics were o. Under normal operating conditions, the flter or the seventh harmonic would

    be on. When this flter was switched on, an immediate rise in the icker level was observed. When this icker was

    perceived, the flters also produced a severe and entirely abnormal noise. This confrmed the suspicion that the

    observed icker originates rom interharmonic voltages combined with an anti-resonance requency o one or more

    passive flters.

    Measurements were carried out with the rolling mill and various combinations o flters in service. The purpose was to

    see which o the confgurations was provoking icker.

    3. Results

    3.1 First measurement: 5th, 7th and 11th harmonic flters on

    First we examined interharmonic content o the 30 kV supply voltage during a given period o unctioning o the

    rolling mill and six passes (ater the rolling mill, the steel plate goes through six dierent passes to urther smooth

    the surace o the steel). Only the maximum values or each interharmonic were recorded. The analysis period

    is 500 seconds, and the interharmonics are calculated at 5 Hz steps.

  • 7/28/2019 Case Studies Flicker Problems in Steel Plant Caused by Interharmonics

    6/13

    6

    http://www.leonardo-energy.org

    Power Quality

    1.5

    1.4

    1.3

    1.2

    1.1

    1.0

    0.9

    0.8

    0.7

    0.6

    0.5

    0.4

    0.3

    0.2

    0.1

    00 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20

    Harmonic order

    %o

    fUfundamental

    100th percentile o URS with the flters or H5, H7 and H11 in service

    Figure 8: Voltage interharmonic spectrum in the rst lter conguration (maximum values)

    We can see that the resonances appear at the ollowing requencies:

    ! Rank 2,5 or 125 Hz

    ! Rank 3,6 or 180 Hz

    ! Rank 6,6 or 330 Hz

    ! Rank 9,2 or 460 Hz

    Comparing these requencies with the anti-resonance requencies o the frst flter confguration, we can see that two

    requencies correspond: 180 Hz (or 185/190 Hz) and 330 Hz. A little slack is observed at the 485 Hz component, but the

    dierence stays very small. There is consequently a serious risk o resonance at those requencies. The corresponding

    evolution over time o the currents (50 Hz values) drawn by the rolling mill and the six passes, is shown in Figure 9.

    900

    800

    700

    600

    500

    400

    300

    200

    100

    00 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500

    Duration (sec)

    Ifund

    (A)

    Currents in the rolling mill and the dierent passes with the flters or H5, H7 and H11 in service

    pass 1

    pass 2

    pass 3

    pass 4

    pass 5

    pass 6

    rolling mill

    Figure 9: 50 Hz currents o the rolling mill and six passes rst lter conguration

    The various passes that start up one ater another can clearly be observed.

    When we now look at the content o the dierent harmonics in each o these 7 currents, we obtain the results given

    in Figure 10 to Figure 13 :

  • 7/28/2019 Case Studies Flicker Problems in Steel Plant Caused by Interharmonics

    7/13

    7

    http://www.leonardo-energy.org

    Power Quality

    8

    7

    6

    5

    4

    3

    2

    1

    00 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500

    Duration (sec)

    IH2,5

    (A)

    Harmonic current o order 2,5 (or 125 Hz) in the rolling mill and the diferent passeses with the lters or H5, H7 and H11 in service

    pass 1

    pass 2

    pass 3

    pass 4

    pass 5

    pass 6

    rolling mill

    Figure 10: Interharmonic current at 125 Hz rst lter conguration

    5

    4

    3

    1.0

    1

    00 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500

    Duration (sec)

    IH3,6

    (A)

    Harmonic current o order 3,6 (or 180 Hz) in the rolling mill and the diferent passes with the lters or H5, H7 and H11 in service

    pass 1

    pass 2

    pass 3

    pass 4

    pass 5

    pass 6

    rolling mill

    Figure 11: interharmonic current at 180 Hz rst lter conguration

    2.5

    2.0

    1.5

    1.0

    0.5

    00 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500

    Duration (sec)

    IH6,6

    (A)

    Harmonic current o order 6,6 (or 330 Hz) in the rolling mill and the diferent passes with the lters or H5, H7 and H11 in service

    pass 1

    pass 2

    pass 3

    pass 4

    pass 5

    pass 6

    rolling mill

    Figure 12: interharmonic current at 330 Hz rst lter conguration

  • 7/28/2019 Case Studies Flicker Problems in Steel Plant Caused by Interharmonics

    8/13

    8

    http://www.leonardo-energy.org

    Power Quality

    4

    3.5

    3

    2.5

    2

    1.5

    1

    0.5

    00 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500

    Duration (sec)

    IH9,2

    (A)

    Harmonic current o order 9,2 (or 460 Hz) in the rolling mill and the diferent passes with the lters or H5, H7 and H11 in service

    pass 1

    pass 2

    pass 3

    pass 4

    pass 5

    pass 6

    rolling mill

    Figure 13: interharmonic current at 460 Hz rst lter conguration

    Two major conclusions can be drawn rom these fgures:

    ! The rolling mill provokes by ar the greatest part o the interharmonics

    ! The currents o the passes have higher interharmonics at 125 Hz and 330 Hz when they are not unctioning

    than when they are in service!

    Looking at the harmonic currents running through the various flters, the ollowing can be observed:

    ! Along with the 50 Hz component, each flter obviously has a signifcant harmonic component corresponding

    to the tuning requency it was designed or

    ! Each flter also has current components at other characteristic harmonic requencies (rank11, rank13, etc.),

    mostly those higher than the tuning requency (this is particularly true or higher tuning requencies)

    ! Interharmonic currents can also be observed in the three flters:

    o Rank 2,5

    o Rank 3,6

    o Rank 6,6

    o Rank 9,2

    0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20

    0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20

    0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20

    30

    20

    10

    0

    20

    15

    10

    5

    0

    40

    30

    20

    10

    0

    100th percentile with the lters or H5, H7 and H11 in service

    A

    A

    A

    Harmonic order

    Current in the lter or H5

    Current in the lter or H7

    Current in the lter or H11

    Figure 14: interharmonic currents in the three lters rst lter conguration

  • 7/28/2019 Case Studies Flicker Problems in Steel Plant Caused by Interharmonics

    9/13

    9

    http://www.leonardo-energy.org

    Power Quality

    3.2 Second measurement: 5th and 7th harmonic flters on

    Again, we frst examined the interharmonic voltages during a given period o unctioning o the rolling mill and the

    six passes. The analysis period was 750 seconds this time.

    1.5

    1.4

    1.3

    1.2

    1.1

    1

    0.9

    0.8

    0.7

    0.6

    0.5

    0.4

    0.3

    0.2

    0.1

    00 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20

    Harmonic order

    %o

    fUfundamental

    100th percentile o URS

    with the flters or H5 and H7 in service

    Figure 15: voltage interharmonic spectrum in the second lter conguration (maximum values)

    The resonances appear on the ollowing requencies:

    ! Rank 2,5 or 125 Hz

    ! Rank 3,6 or 180 Hz

    ! Rank 6,6 or 330 Hz

    Rank 9.2 was not taken into account this time, since there is no anti-resonance impedance expected or this rank.

    Regardless o the impact o this interharmonic, it will be smaller than in the frst flter confguration.

    The corresponding evolution over time o the currents (50 Hz values) o the rolling mill and the dierent passes

    is as ollows:

    900

    800

    700

    600

    500

    400

    300

    200

    100

    00 100 200 300 400 500 600 700

    Duration (sec)

    Ifund

    (A)

    Currents in the rolling mill and the dierent passes with the flters or H5 and H7 in service

    pass 1

    pass 2

    pass 3

    pass 4

    pass 5

    pass 6

    quatro

    Figure 16: 50 Hz currents o the rolling mill and six passes second lter conguration

    Again, the various passes that start up one ater another can clearly be observed.

    When examining the content o the harmonics in each o the seven currents, the observations are similar, as in the

    frst measurement:

    ! The rolling mill provokes by ar the greatest part o the interharmonics

    ! The currents o the passes have higher interharmonics at 125 Hz and 330 Hz when they are not

    unctioning than when they are in service

  • 7/28/2019 Case Studies Flicker Problems in Steel Plant Caused by Interharmonics

    10/13

    10

    http://www.leonardo-energy.org

    Looking at the harmonic currents running through the various flters, the ollowing can be observed:

    ! The eleventh harmonic is higher in the two remaining flters o this confguration (this is obvious since the

    flter or h11 is not in service)

    ! The ninth harmonic is much lower than in the frst confguration

    ! The interharmonics o rank 9.2 have disappeared

    0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20

    0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20

    30

    25

    20

    15

    10

    5

    0

    15

    10

    5

    0

    100th percentile with the flters or H5 and H7 in service

    A

    A

    Harmonic order

    Current in the flter or H5

    Current in the flter or H7

    Figure 17: Interharmonic currents in the three lters second lter conguration

    3.3 Third measurement: 5th harmonic flter on

    We examined the interharmonic voltages during a given period o unctioning o the rolling mill and the six passes or

    the third time. The analysis period was again 750 seconds.

    2.2

    2.0

    1.8

    1.6

    1.4

    1.2

    1.0

    0.8

    0.6

    0.4

    0.2

    00 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20

    Harmonic order

    %o

    fUfundamental

    100th percentile o URS

    with the flters or H5 in service

    Figure 18: voltage interharmonic spectrum in the third lter conguration (maximum values)

    The resonances appear at the ollowing requencies:

    ! Rank 2,5 or 125 Hz

    ! Rank 3,6 or 180 Hz

    The resonance or rank 6,6 has almost completely disappeared.

    The corresponding time evolution o the currents (50 Hz values) o the rolling mill and the six passes is as ollows:

    Power Quality

  • 7/28/2019 Case Studies Flicker Problems in Steel Plant Caused by Interharmonics

    11/13

    11

    http://www.leonardo-energy.org

    800

    700

    600

    500

    400

    300

    200

    100

    00 100 200 300 400 500 600 700

    Duration (sec)

    Ifund

    (A)

    Currents in the rolling mill and the diferent passes with the lters or H5 in service

    pass 1

    pass 2

    pass 3

    pass 4

    pass 5

    pass 6

    rolling mill

    Figure 19: 50 Hz currents o the rolling mill and six passes third lter conguration

    Again, the various passes that start up one ater another can clearly be observed. When again examining the contento the harmonics in each o the seven currents, observations are similar to those in the frst measurement:

    ! The rolling mill still produces interharmonics o rank 2.5 and 3.6

    ! The passes provoke mainly interharmonics o rank 3.6

    4. Lines of enquiry

    Based on these measurement results, one can start seeking the origin o the interharmonic currents. A new

    measurement campaign was carried out to record an incident. The aim was to determine where the interharmonics

    come rom and how they provoked the incident.

    18

    16

    14

    12

    10

    8

    6

    4

    2

    017:00 17:05 17:10 17:14 17:19 17:25 17:30

    Duration (hour: minute)

    I(A)

    180 Hz currents (200ms values)

    Rolling mill

    Transformer 13

    cold rolling mill

    Figure 20: 180 Hz currents in the main rolling mill, a cold rolling mill, and their eeding transormer

    As shown in Figure 20, the 180 Hz component is clearly present in the currents o the eeding transormer (called

    transormer 13 in the fgure), the rolling mill, and in a cold rolling mill that is also connected to this transormer.

    It is consequently certain that this 180 Hz current is linked to the loads connected to this transormer. Looking into

    detail at the six passes, it appears that passes 1, 2, and 6 also provoke this 180 Hz component, while the other three

    passes do not, as shown in the ollowing fgure:

    Power Quality

  • 7/28/2019 Case Studies Flicker Problems in Steel Plant Caused by Interharmonics

    12/13

    12

    http://www.leonardo-energy.org

    0 1 2 3 4 5 6

    50

    25

    0

    100th percentile

    A

    0 1 2 3 4 5 6

    50

    25

    0

    A

    0 1 2 3 4 5 6

    50

    25

    0

    A

    0 1 2 3 4 5 6

    50

    25

    0

    A

    0 1 2 3 4 5 6

    50

    25

    0

    A

    0 1 2 3 4 5 6

    50

    25

    0

    A

    Harmonic order

    Cage 1

    Cage 2

    Cage 3

    Cage 4

    Cage 5

    Cage 6

    Figure 21: maximum o the 180 Hz component o the current in the passes

    The fnal conclusion was that passes 1, 2, and 6 provoke the interharmonic currents. The 180 Hz component is present

    in those three passes, and only when they are unctioning. The 180 Hz component is also present in the main rolling

    mill (and also in a cold rolling mill), but without correlation with the unctioning o this mill.

    Note: in Figure 22, the transormer current was measured at the high voltage side (primary voltage).

    800

    700

    600

    500

    400

    300

    200

    10017:00 17:05 17:10 17:14 17:19 17:25 17:30

    Duration (hour: minute)

    I(A)

    50 Hz currents (200ms values)

    Rolling mill

    Transformer 13

    Cold rolling mill

    Figure 22: 50 Hz currents in the main rolling mill, a cold rolling mill, and their eeding transormer

    5. Conclusions and solutions

    5.1 Conclusions

    The measurements clearly show the presence o interharmonics on the voltages as well as on the currents. Their

    requencies are 125 Hz (rank 2.5), 180 Hz (rank 3.6), 330 Hz (rank 6.6), and 460 Hz (rank 9.2).

    Those our interharmonics are produced by the rolling mill and its passes.

    The three flters create high harmonic impedance or the requencies 180 Hz, 330 Hz, and 485 Hz respectively. These

    are the anti-resonances o the tuning requencies o the flters.

    The levels o the various interharmonics are high enough to provoke perceptible icker.

    Power Quality

  • 7/28/2019 Case Studies Flicker Problems in Steel Plant Caused by Interharmonics

    13/13

    http://www.leonardo-energy.org

    Whether the flter or h11 is in service or not, the interharmonics in the two other flters remain at the same level.

    However, they do not present a danger to the flters themselves.

    5.2 Solutions

    In so ar as the presence o interharmonics on the voltage is not aecting the state o the equipment connected to the30 kV busbar, the easiest solutions to this icker problem are either changing the lighting devices, or eeding them via

    another transormer (separation o the electrical circuits).

    I malunctioning or even damage is observed on the equipment connected to the 30 kV busbar, other solutions must

    be investigated. Those can include:

    ! A deep study o the mechanism inside the drives that lies at the origin o the interharmonic currents

    (e.g. a study o the regulation loop/o the closed loop o the drive control), in order to eliminate them

    ! Detuning the flters, with the risk o aecting their e ciency in fltering the harmonics

    The malunctioning mentioned above can or instance be a vibration problem, which can provoke the detachment o

    connections and consequently flter damage. It is a good idea to check the connections regularly.

    This publication is subject to copyright and a disclaimer. Please refer to the Leonardo ENERGY website.

    Power Quality