Case 3:18-cv-02454 Document 1 Filed 04/25/18 Page 1 of 30 · Case 3:18-cv-02454 Document 1 Filed...

30
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 ALDEN F. ABBOTT Acting General Counsel KATHARINE ROLLER MATTHEW WILSHIRE (CA Bar No. 224328) DAVID LINCICUM Attorneys Federal Trade Commission 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20580 Phone: (202) 326-3582 Facsimile: (202) 326-3768 Email: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Attorneys for Plaintiff Federal Trade Commission UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. LENDINGCLUB CORPORATION, d/b/a Lending Club, Defendant. Case No. ____________ COMPLAINT Case 3:18-cv-02454 Document 1 Filed 04/25/18 Page 1 of 30

Transcript of Case 3:18-cv-02454 Document 1 Filed 04/25/18 Page 1 of 30 · Case 3:18-cv-02454 Document 1 Filed...

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ALDEN F. ABBOTT Acting General Counsel KATHARINE ROLLER MATTHEW WILSHIRE (CA Bar No. 224328) DAVID LINCICUM Attorneys Federal Trade Commission 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20580 Phone: (202) 326-3582 Facsimile: (202) 326-3768 Email: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Attorneys for Plaintiff Federal Trade Commission

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,

Plaintiff,

v.

LENDINGCLUB CORPORATION,

d/b/a Lending Club,

Defendant.

Case No. ____________

COMPLAINT

Case 3:18-cv-02454 Document 1 Filed 04/25/18 Page 1 of 30

COMPLAINT Federal Trade Commission Case No. __________ 600 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W. Washington, DC 20580 2 (202) 326-2222

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Plaintiff, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”), for its Complaint alleges:

1. The FTC brings this action under Section 13(b) of the Federal Trade Commission Act

(“FTC Act”), 15 U.S.C. § 53(b), and the Privacy of Consumer Financial Information Rule

(“Privacy Rule”), 16 C.F.R. Part 313, recodified at 12 C.F.R. § 1016 (“Reg. P”), and issued

pursuant to Sections 501-504 of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (“GLB Act”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 6801-

6803, to obtain permanent injunctive relief, rescission or reformation of contracts, restitution, the

refund of monies paid, disgorgement of ill-gotten monies, and other equitable relief for

Defendant’s acts or practices in violation of Section 5(a) of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. § 45(a), and

the Privacy Rule, 16 C.F.R. Part 313, recodified at 12 C.F.R. § 1016.

JURISDICTION AND VENUE

2. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1337(a), and

1345, and 15 U.S.C. §§ 45(a) and 53(b).

3. Venue is proper in this district under 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(1), (b)(2), (c)(2), (c)(3), and

(d), and 15 U.S.C. § 53(b).

INTRADISTRICT ASSIGNMENT

4. Assignment to the San Francisco Division is proper because at all relevant times

Defendant has conducted business, marketed its services, and provided its services in the county

of San Francisco.

PLAINTIFF

5. The FTC is an independent agency of the United States Government created by statute.

15 U.S.C. §§ 41-58. The FTC enforces Section 5(a) of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. § 45(a), which

prohibits unfair or deceptive acts or practices in or affecting commerce. The FTC also enforces

the Privacy Rule, 16 C.F.R. Part 313, recodified at 12 C.F.R. § 1016, which requires financial

institutions to protect the privacy of consumer information.

6. The FTC is authorized to initiate federal district court proceedings, by its own attorneys,

to enjoin violations of the FTC Act, and the Privacy Rule, and to secure such equitable relief as

Case 3:18-cv-02454 Document 1 Filed 04/25/18 Page 2 of 30

COMPLAINT Federal Trade Commission Case No. __________ 600 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W. Washington, DC 20580 3 (202) 326-2222

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

may be appropriate in each case, including rescission or reformation of contracts, restitution, the

refund of monies paid, and the disgorgement of ill-gotten monies. 15 U.S.C. §§ 53(b),

56(a)(2)(A), and 16 C.F.R. Parts 313 & 314.

DEFENDANT

7. Defendant LendingClub Corporation, also doing business as Lending Club (“Lending

Club”), is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business at 71 Stevenson Street,

Suite 300, San Francisco, California 94105. Lending Club transacts or has transacted business in

this district and throughout the United States. At all times material to this complaint, Lending

Club has advertised, marketed, and distributed unsecured personal loans to consumers

throughout the United States.

COMMERCE

8. At all times material to this Complaint, Defendant has maintained a substantial course of

trade in or affecting commerce, as “commerce” is defined in Section 4 of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C.

§ 44.

DEFENDANT’S BUSINESS ACTIVITIES

9. Defendant offers unsecured consumer loans through its website, www.lendingclub.com.

Defendant advertises its loan offerings and handles consumer interactions during the life of the

application and loan, including application processing, assessment of creditworthiness, and loan

servicing, although the loans are formally issued by a bank.

10. Defendant lures prospective borrowers by promising “no hidden fees,” but when the loan

funds arrive in consumers’ bank accounts, they are hundreds or even thousands of dollars short

of expectations due to a hidden up-front fee that Defendant deducts from consumers’ loan

proceeds. Defendant is persisting in this conduct despite warnings from its own compliance

department that Defendant’s concealment of the up-front fee is “likely to mislead the consumer.”

Defendant also has misled consumers about whether their loan applications have been approved,

stringing consumers along by, for example, telling consumers, “Hooray! Investors Have Backed

Case 3:18-cv-02454 Document 1 Filed 04/25/18 Page 3 of 30

COMPLAINT Federal Trade Commission Case No. __________ 600 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W. Washington, DC 20580 4 (202) 326-2222

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Your Loan” when Defendant knew many such consumers would never receive a loan. Based on

these misrepresentations, consumers believed that Defendant’s funds were forthcoming, and did

not apply for credit with Defendant’s competitors. And with numerous consumers who have

received a loan, Defendant has withdrawn double payments from consumers’ accounts and

continued to charge consumers who cancelled automatic payments or even paid off their loans

entirely, costing consumers overdraft fees and preventing them from making other payments.

11. In addition, Defendant failed to provide consumers with clear and conspicuous privacy

notices.

Consumers’ Application Process

12. Many consumers first learn of Defendant’s products through its advertisements. In

those advertisements, Defendant often represents that it charges “no hidden fees.” For example,

many of Defendant’s mail advertisements include a line that states, “FEES: There are no hidden

fees or prepayment penalties.” An example of such an advertisement is attached as Exhibit A.

Many other mail advertisements prominently represent in bold type, “No hidden fees or

prepayment penalties,” directly underneath a large, colorful exclamation point. An example of

such a representation from Defendant’s mail advertisements appears below. An example of an

advertisement in which this representation appears is attached as Exhibit B.

Case 3:18-cv-02454 Document 1 Filed 04/25/18 Page 4 of 30

I •

No hidd.n f- or p~paymant p•nalti•

We offer llexible oan amounts and terms. there are NO hidden fees and no penalties for paying off your loan earl¥-

COMPLAINT Federal Trade Commission Case No. __________ 600 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W. Washington, DC 20580 5 (202) 326-2222

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

13. Defendant’s online advertisements also frequently represent that its loans contain “no

hidden fees.” An example of an online banner advertisement making this representation appears

below.

14. In addition, Defendant created online advertising in the form of paid blog posts

promoting its product on popular financial blogs; many of these posts included the “no hidden

fees” representation. For example, a blog post that Defendant created that still appears on the

credit website Quizzle states, “[O]nce you’re approved, your money goes straight into your

account, with no hidden fees.”

15. Consumers who view Defendant’s online, mail, or television advertisements or hear

Defendant’s radio advertisements are directed to apply for Defendant’s loans by visiting

Defendant’s website, www.lendingclub.com. When consumers visit the home page of

Defendant’s website to apply for a personal loan, they have seen a screen similar to the

following:

Case 3:18-cv-02454 Document 1 Filed 04/25/18 Page 5 of 30

i;nLendlngGlub Cut ~own your debt with fixect monthly payments

o 1-li.dden Fees f) o Prepayment Penalties

View Your Offers

You'rn a eady pre,sapprovedl

COMPLAINT Federal Trade Commission Case No. __________ 600 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W. Washington, DC 20580 6 (202) 326-2222

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

The page has asked consumers “How much do you need?”

16. Consumers who visit Defendant’s home page on a mobile device see a screen similar to

the following:

Case 3:18-cv-02454 Document 1 Filed 04/25/18 Page 6 of 30

i;!! LendingClub Personal Loans Auto Refinancing

Financial Innovation

Lending Club is the world 's largestonline marketplace connecting borroV11Srs and investors. W3're transforming the banking system to make credit more afordable and investing more rewarding. We operate at a

Business Loans

INVESTORS'

Patient Solutions

•••• ••• •••• ••••

BORR'1WER

C:'

~ Help

Investing How It Works At>out us

Personal Loans up to $40,000

I How much do you need?

[ What is it for? ,, [ 1-iow is your credit? ,,

12] Respond to mail

Check Your Rate

Won't impact your a-edit score

Featured Borrower

COMPLAINT Federal Trade Commission Case No. __________ 600 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W. Washington, DC 20580 7 (202) 326-2222

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Again, Defendant asks consumers, “How much do you need?”

17. Consumers next see a page titled “Check Your Rate,” similar to the example below:

Case 3:18-cv-02454 Document 1 Filed 04/25/18 Page 7 of 30

Personal Loans up to $40,000

Ho\ai rruch do you need?

What is it for?

How is your credit?

Check Your Rate

v\bn't i~t your credit score

orlearn about Investing

Financial Innovation Lending Club is the world's largest online marketplace connecting borrowers and investors. We're transforming the banking system to make credit more affordable and investing more rewarding . We operate at a lower cost than traditional

bank lending programs and pass the savings on to borrowers

in the form of lower rates and to investors in the form of solid

returns.

INVESTORS'

4

•••• • •• •••• .... BORROWER

Monthly Paymeo••

COMPLAINT Federal Trade Commission Case No. __________ 600 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W. Washington, DC 20580 8 (202) 326-2222

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

18. Once consumers complete this page, Defendant conducts a credit pull on applicants’

credit reports. Defendant then immediately rejects those consumers that it determines do not

meet certain baseline criteria. Defendant refers to this step as “front-end” denial. Consumers

who are rejected on the front end are not shown any loan offers from Defendant.

19. If Defendant determines that a consumer meets Defendant’s baseline lending criteria,

Defendant has presented consumers a page of loan offers similar to the following:

Case 3:18-cv-02454 Document 1 Filed 04/25/18 Page 8 of 30

Check Your Rate

Get a custom rate for your $10,000 loan in 1 click

Application Type LI _1_nd_iv_i_du_a_1 _________ •_,I

First Name

Last Name

Street Address

City

State Choose One

Zip Code

Date of Birth

Email Address

Create Password

Yearly Individual Income

Yearly Add itiona l Income (Optional)

Month • Day Year

(.J Yes, I agree to the 10 110..;ng:

the Terms Of Use

the ESIGN Act Consent that enab les all transactions and disclosure delivery to occur electron ically

• the Credit Profile Authorization and for Lend ing Club to verify my income.

Get Your Rate

How it Works Privacy He lp

Checking your rate will not_­

affect your credit score. iiiiill

Need Help?

Get Online Help

IJ Contact us

COMPLAINT Federal Trade Commission Case No. __________ 600 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W. Washington, DC 20580 9 (202) 326-2222

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

On this page, Defendant presents consumers with bold-faced offers of a specific “Loan

Amount.” The only mention of fees on this page is the representation, “No hidden fees,”

accompanied by an icon of a smiling masked bandit.

20. On a desktop, a small green dot with a white question mark inside appears beside the

word “APR.” Defendant describes this dot as the “tooltip.” If a consumer clicks on the tooltip, a

pop-up bubble appears containing a small-print disclosure such as the following:

Case 3:18-cv-02454 Document 1 Filed 04/25/18 Page 9 of 30

!;!! LendingClub How ,tWlrks Privacy Sign Out Help

Excellent! You Qual ify for a Credit Card Refinance Loan

We have a great rate for you:

$10,000 $329.24 (36 payments) 11.39% 14.98% Loan Amount Monthly Payment Interest Rate APR Q

Get Loan

§ ~ . @ Fixed interest rate No prepayrrent penalties No hidden fees

You also qualify for these loan amounts:

$16 ,000 $526.78 36 11 .39% 14.98% Get Loan Loan Amount Monthly Payment Months Interest Rate APR Q

$372.21 60 13.99% 16.81% Get Loan Monthly Payment Months Interest Rate APR Q

ie:1A nnn ctAt:::n OA ~~ 11 "J:00/_ 1 .A OllOI_

COMPLAINT Federal Trade Commission Case No. __________ 600 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W. Washington, DC 20580 10 (202) 326-2222

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

21. At the bottom of the pop-up, after an explanation of the term “APR,” the text mentions an

up-front fee that is collected out of consumers’ loan proceeds. If a consumer does not click on

the tooltip, the pop-up bubble does not appear, and there is no other disclosure on this page from

which a consumer could learn of the existence of the up-front fee. A consumer does not need to

click on the tooltip in order to move forward with the loan application.

22. On a mobile device, the loan offers page also does not mention any fees, other than the

representation, “No hidden fees.” An example of the mobile loan offers page appears below:

Case 3:18-cv-02454 Document 1 Filed 04/25/18 Page 10 of 30

How it Works Privacy Sign Out Help

Excellent! You Qua li fy for a Credit Card Refinance Loan i----: 7

$10,000 Loan Amount

Fixed interest rate

We have a great rate for you :

$308.73 (36 payments) Monthly Payment

Get Loan

~ L=J

No prepayment penalties

6.99% Interest Rate

9.41% APR 0

No hidden fees

APR stands for Annual Percentage Rate, and is a measure of the total cost of credit as an annual rate. The APR is comprised of the annual interest you pay at a rate of 6.99% - which is ultimately paid each month to the investors who enable your loan - and a one-t ime ori gination fee of 3.5% ($350.00) that is collected out of your loan proc eeds.

COMPLAINT Federal Trade Commission Case No. __________ 600 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W. Washington, DC 20580 11 (202) 326-2222

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

If a consumer were to tap on the APR, he or she would be shown a pop-up bubble similar to that

shown to a consumer viewing the loan offers page on a computer who clicks on the tooltip.

Otherwise, the pop-up bubble would not appear, and there is no other disclosure on this page

from which a consumer could learn of the existence of the up-front fee.

23. Although Defendant tells consumers that its loans contain “No hidden fees,” Defendant

nevertheless charges consumers an up-front fee that is not clearly and conspicuously disclosed.

This fee is calculated as a percentage—on average, approximately 5 percent—of the consumer’s

requested loan amount, and often amounts to more than a thousand dollars.

Case 3:18-cv-02454 Document 1 Filed 04/25/18 Page 11 of 30

E:©ellent! You Qualify for a Oreilfrt Card RJefin:ance Loan

We have a great rate for you:

$110,000 Loan Amo11 t

Monthly Payment $329.24

Months 36

Interest Rate 11 .39%

APR 14.98%

Get Loan

Filced · erest ra e

You also qualify for these loan amounts:

$16,000

Per l.bnt l,bnths Interest Rate APR

$526.78 36 H .39% 14.98% Get Loa n

COMPLAINT Federal Trade Commission Case No. __________ 600 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W. Washington, DC 20580 12 (202) 326-2222

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

24. Defendant deducts the hidden up-front fee from the promised “Loan Amount” before

disbursing the loan funds to the consumer. As a result, the amount of money that Defendant

disburses to a consumer’s bank account is always substantially smaller than the promised “Loan

Amount.” And because consumers must pay interest on the entire “Loan Amount,” including the

fee, Defendant’s hidden fee leaves consumers paying interest on principal that they never

received.

25. Consumers frequently complain to Defendant that they were not aware of the up-front fee

that would be deducted from the full “Loan Amount” that they requested. For example, one

consumer reported that he applied for $15,000 to cover relocation expenses, and was surprised to

receive only $14,000—an amount insufficient to cover his relocation—after Defendant deducted

a $1,000 up-front fee. Another consumer applied for a $30,000 loan in order to consolidate his

credit card debt at a lower interest rate; because Defendant deducted a $1,200 up-front fee,

however, the consumer was unable to pay off his credit card debt in full, leaving him with more

bills to pay than he had before.

26. Defendant is aware that many consumers do not know about the up-front fee and expect

to receive the full loan amount. Defendant’s training materials for customer service

representatives list “I didn’t receive the full loan amount” as one of the two main post-

disbursement complaints that representatives should be prepared to address. And Defendant’s

quarterly complaint reviews have proposed “highlighting [the] origination fee” to address

complaint volumes. In addition, internal compliance reviews repeatedly cite the concealment of

the fee as a significant problem for consumers. For example, one compliance review noted:

“The origination fee is disclosed on the offer page tooltip, but is not readily apparent unless an

applicant clicks on the tooltip. This omission could be perceived as deceptive as it is likely to

mislead the consumer.” One of Defendant’s largest investors also warned Defendant that the up-

front fee “is not clear and conspicuous and could be subject to a UDAAP claim,” referring to an

unfair or deceptive acts and practices claim. The investor’s legal counsel also told Defendant

Case 3:18-cv-02454 Document 1 Filed 04/25/18 Page 12 of 30

COMPLAINT Federal Trade Commission Case No. __________ 600 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W. Washington, DC 20580 13 (202) 326-2222

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

that Defendant’s ads “prominently state[] that there are ‘No Hidden Fees’ yet the documents we

reviewed contain a large ($300 to $450) origination fee that only appears once,” and warned this

“relative obscurity” could make it a target in a law enforcement action.

27. Defendant has ignored these warnings. Rather than improving over time, Defendant’s

violations have become more egregious over the years: when redesigning the application flow in

the winter of 2014, Defendant increased the prominence of the “No hidden fees” representation

and decreased the prominence of the tooltip.

28. On the Loan Offer page, where a consumer is presented with the “No hidden fees”

representation, the accompanying bandit icon, and the “Loan Amount,” the consumer may accept

the offered terms by clicking a button reading “Get Loan” or “Continue.” If a consumer clicks

on this button, he or she is then sent to a page titled “Loan Details,” similar to the example

below:

Case 3:18-cv-02454 Document 1 Filed 04/25/18 Page 13 of 30

!;!lLendingClub f-bw ~ 'lwrks Privacy Sign Out Help

Loan Deta ils

" --- ,- -, , ' , '

+ I ' + I 4 I

' ' I • , • , .. . .. . -.. Check '!bur Rate Loan Details

Just a few more details before you get your credit card refinance loan

Personal Information

PnmaryPhone C~I-----------~ Choose one

Social Security Number

Employment Status Choose one

f-bwdid you hear about us? (Optional) Choose One

Next •

P!t!IW •ni.t you, homt or mobi!t phont numbtr

My Home

Need Help?

Get Online Help

IJ Contact us

COMPLAINT Federal Trade Commission Case No. __________ 600 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W. Washington, DC 20580 14 (202) 326-2222

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

The screen states, in large type: “Just a few more details before you get your [purpose] loan.”

The same representation appears on the mobile version of the “Loan Details” page.

29. Consumers who click the “Next” button are then shown a page titled “Loan Rate &

Terms.” An example of the desktop version of the page appears below:

Case 3:18-cv-02454 Document 1 Filed 04/25/18 Page 14 of 30

!:!!LendingCllub

Loan IRate & Terms

+ 0 + ,,. --... , '

I . . . ·-·

TRUTH IN LEN DING DISCLOS RE STATEMENT

u,_, ~ bBSl"K

Bofrl)lm!r -2156ol..,ITl8(Bra eEo1 ~ ISil Dll ~"La"'Cl'!' Ul 11

)5

PER CENTAOE ..... ,..,...

$. .24

lll9.50

fl tl'i;,jCECH/1.AGE ,lv,wunlf ri~ d Total -of Plty~ lll dolarwnrom lhe- lkama.:mcr ti1edt ThcitmOIJft)1)111,;,1

cre:tu,fl c:;-...: ,n ~ : .edtol'tl'- cr,m ~ p.l•: aen yc:u ~betnrl 1H, Iii

a::»11.UCF¥.Qf'D

'tli119fl J)i]yl'1)):n~ iJrt: !IU'.J(t:)

"toir1rsr. P:l'JIMnl 'MIi Df! ,111e me m nm Wr cne esu:1 r,:e of v,ou- io.an ar.:i 1">£in mor 'I mer€1-an£ir F&>,mer al'tl due on m F.!~ur~ oa1e e.Jen morm. thrur oi..,;, oaw n. me 29n . • Dlfl <1r 31R arw=I ~ ,c;l,l'TI:if'Tf m.)11111 Ii ~hDffil y,our 0t1~nl '!11'1I bl:I on tr'lel.l':!l D:ly<0rm mo nltl .

~..., W. 1.1"'111~ •l~IIL'tl\lu~~ 1111.mlls~ iu1n lh1:1 itc:1.1ti1 11w 0-:m., ,or,c..i r1C1 an.

Lare c. tiar~et;· 11'your p-c1~amv-us ..iooryciur t5 <day ~ri;,:;e pe.rlM )'OU idl tie i:; 1:11118d Gi ltiite i'OO Er:1 U1:11 Iha gr&at er o 5. O.,Qr tne l:Jl! p~mernYnOunt or 1-15. Tt1 1s ree e maro£oa oNy -0nce aer 1e paym£inL

~~nl polK'/ If ~u JI .I '/ 11 f ~ur ]o;Jl"I ~.:i rly )'OU ~I net be: ch;r;i~ ;a ~ n~ty In lh~ ~ crla full p~pay~ nt, )'DU may

tte urtit1£11:l m a 1'01.Jrnl or oart 011:fle nnirl(e ch;1111

')IS!f! )'OIJ borr~r -111 rr,e,11( ro, nny .ad1lonl l klro,m,ili®, lbOO, floopa;rTllf!n11 <1era11.1111 «-OCl"ter mmtert retMed to ; .x.-lOaH,

Omt!r !Mf1 fMiYt'renl iill~ . [1!:f11S me~ II:!) 'fii ll MC:r l:!Me If ~00 IN:i:!1~1!' ~i t lhai'l 100'!,\, auna ilQ. ~1)31(11k!!l:t (Jf

Iha u Nlm;ata • mDUr.11 of thll loan~ yau, APR M l not c hang.1. 511:1,tgcl i o )'our r1gh1 La c anc at, ;,in unncu141d loan

llll)' l5t1JE'fl)fl' 1eu. tn11nffitl ftl l reque:UMIOOl'l&moont I rtl!lt: nCM10Dl!it h.Jncledb)'1tl?end'Olltnt! llstng per

lol.i l Am>unt aq~bnf 'S1,0 000.ll)

Ofl !Jll'\illlOfl Feoo: '5500.00 lbl:ll l Pr001mt RMe rteel. 1-"9,5 0.00

Lm.uc c- eS!i'U P~,~1 rei:i. '/Alen 3 p.a~·m&n t fa il!! ard 18 relei:lfd l.¥J r,1H OOn l !.'DU .r., 11 be ch:ug@d .an Uns1m:e8slil Payment Fee ot S 1~ bJ cover the co5l Lendl"'CI 01.0 nun on he tram.icbon.

6:Kh ater°Tll1 to callau vi fTIOflllll)' payme,n1 1s "-Ofl5HH1red 61 iEQ.iriile O'.ins.at.1on. so en u-isucwi~1 P.i)TTle,nt Fee 'MIi ti@ a,ses.::edror 1:1a(h railei!J.all1:1mal

You, Bff' riot re<1 ulrec1 ro <:llfr t!m IMc aoratim!'nL m!'ff'tt be~fntse ~~ heYe rt-c:e lved u1t1% ,dls,cfoiJJrt-e or i.lgnud ;a borr lWllll r ;,ignci11111111.

1 hil EklltaWll t ~GlaQITI .ind Iha CtQChl Sca11:1 ~CG.

COMPLAINT Federal Trade Commission Case No. __________ 600 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W. Washington, DC 20580 15 (202) 326-2222

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

30. The only place the up-front fee is disclosed on this page is the unbolded itemization that

appears sandwiched between more prominent, bolded paragraphs. In most standard screen

configurations, the unbolded list appears “below the fold,” such that consumers would need to

scroll down in order to see it.

31. On a mobile device, if a consumer clicks the green button on the Loan Offer page, the

consumer is taken to a page featuring links to the Borrower Agreement and Credit Score Notice

and a large “I Agree” button that allows consumers to move forward with the loan application

process. If a consumer clicks on the button, the consumer’s application is complete. A version

of this page that Defendant has presented appears below as it would appear on many

smartphones, including iPhones and other models:

At numerous times, on an iPhone 5 and similar models, the Truth in Lending tab would appear

below the fold.

32. In the version appearing above, if, instead of clicking on the large green “I Agree” button,

a consumer goes further on the screen, sees the Truth in Lending Disclosure Statement, and

Case 3:18-cv-02454 Document 1 Filed 04/25/18 Page 15 of 30

1;i!LendingClub

Loan Rate & Terms

••~--•----o Ottdl:Y~ L.NnDt:14 Lo.ffl • rms 3uk ~- Aimutd

80l"rower Agrt-t-ment

C~dit Sc:ore No6c-•

Cliclong ... Agr••• below 00nn1tu~5 your eS.cuon11:: wanat1.1re- and aooeptsnt:e of tne BOJTowM Agreem.nt.

and lh• •---• •• C,..cht Score Hotic•. and th• Trud\ in Ltnding Oitclosur• St111tm.nt.

I Agree

ThH4 agre• m• nll. wl also be 1va ab,. for you r r• v..w by vs<t.ing www J.ndlngclub.com and naVJgaung to '"Agr.-ements.~

Tnnh In LAnding Olsclosur• SD•m.nt

Lenc:fe,r WebBan 21 S South State Strut Su:t• 800 Safi: lake Crty, U 8 4 111

COMPLAINT Federal Trade Commission Case No. __________ 600 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W. Washington, DC 20580 16 (202) 326-2222

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

scrolls down, a Truth in Lending box with the loan terms would appear. In versions in which the

green “I Agree” button does not appear near the top of the screen, a consumer must also scroll

down in order to see the Truth in Lending Disclosure Statement and a Truth in Lending box.

Below that, a schedule of payments appears. If a consumer were to scroll further down, toward

the bottom of the screen, between a paragraph of bolded language and another paragraph, an

origination fee would be listed. The below screenshot is an example of this section of the mobile

page.

On many devices, information about the up-front fee and total amount received is not displayed

until the consumer has scrolled down approximately four times. A version of this page that

Defendant has presented appears below in its entirety.

Case 3:18-cv-02454 Document 1 Filed 04/25/18 Page 16 of 30

I I I your loan.

Late ch arg es: If yo1.J1 paym ent anives after your 15

day grsoe period , you w il be ch arged a la te fee

equ al to the g reater of: 5 .00 % of the late p aym e11t

am ount or S15. This fee is ch arged only o nce per

late payment.

Prepaym ent poicy: If you pay off your loan ea,ty, you

wil not be ch arged a penalty. In the event of a fu l

p r-epayment. yo u m ay b e entitled to a re fund of part

of the fin ance charge .

See y our borrowe r agreem ent for any additio11a l information about nonpayment, defau lt, or othe r m atte rs re lated to your loan.

I

(e) means estimate

Othe r than payment da tes , item s m ark ed (e) w ill

decrease ifyou rece ive less than 100% funding. Rega rdless of the ulti m ate a m ount of the loan, your APR w ill not change. Subject to your r ight to cance l, an unsecured loan may issue for less than the fu ll reques ted loan a m ount if it i s not 100% funded by the end of the li sting pe ri od.

Total Amount Requested : S 10 ,000.00

Origrl ation Fees: S500.00

Tot al Amount Received : SQ .500.00

Unsuccessful payment fee . Wh en a paym ent fails end is rejected by your bank, you wil be cha,ged an

Unsuccessful Paym ent Fee of S 15 to cover the cost Lendrlg C lub rlcurs on th e tran saction.

Each attem pt to co ct a m onthty paym ent is con sxl ered a separate tran saction. so an Un successfu l Paym ent Fee w il be assessed for e ach failed attem pt.

COMPLAINT Federal Trade Commission Case No. __________ 600 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W. Washington, DC 20580 17 (202) 326-2222

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Case 3:18-cv-02454 Document 1 Filed 04/25/18 Page 17 of 30

• • 0 tM:ii w,:.::11..1 1.:.r-ttcni ~, ~- ,_,.,~

e--ri'a--,11

~.., ...... . •t..:-,z,,.11--,1tl ti1Kln r.1

~ ~ , , ;n •,-n~ .. r~:~, ._:~:.~.~-Tn ... .la Ll'l'WaGti.'ldc-Mu1 l'~N.

n u,.,1g .. ""'° .. ~b ,u u,:11,w-_..,.-<1trp: U"" l'II,..... .. ~ mt.!'Q ~t1g,::ka.1cm11nJ -6o11; 1r.r~i:,

· ·~~~'1,e-1JS.

r, ,..t,l•l....t"'II .__...fl•_...,

'.IK1E!1 .. ~10:3N1'1~9~ ~r.~:D 5-1UIH1.11,U'T~111 -

~~ MWW•i.1 lii!t. .. ~1111•,.

\'oa tnl IDfftMU •111 br,:l __ ....,,,'"""r a-. iUU~M-9 "!I'"• i..a.1 ............ .a1o11111rr,1,

..._.,..r.,-,.-,n..­-•111'?• ... ,_,. -~-1,., ... ............ ,,.,_ ~~n~•""""' WJW'IIII b .,_,.,,_,..,._,.. llillt..-m .. ,twr rl'l'ft•I~

,,.., .. !,!{~~ ba-6-Jll:;-.tbfran •1u,,...,. .... .,, ,,,..,1oW,1

I.aw, llh•~H; r.:1<1•~·,...·"" ft:!"'M-1 i11Ur~,r 1 I

NtP7~0H•d. f'lulil H ~~ I ••t le:~ £1Hll::ifHparll•~,J);.,I :fU. !11• IIIJn<t.rll

M'(..:0.ori.J~S ii!i 1 • l't • il lhlf1~ '11""1' :l'W:il-i:,tl

bt.t:n,.,,,rt.

l",::rjrt"u lp,!q lfr,:,,,p.1,•t1,11 U'"Q:1,..1 ,. JC•

IU!lf'D'~ill~Hplt,'!"J'!'~Ofl,)f6f; I

P"'P•Y""'lt""'t.~;.,,,-._ • .,...'-':lw• .. ~•fp1n tl"i'I• __ ,_ ..

.Jtt l IU' blfr~ ~a,ttP.,tnl l'if lilt a()Hjllllll l 1fl:ffl'l:III01Jola,in.::.ap:1Jn,trtl, !»iHl1,, ffllil'»r

nltillnT'911 bdl•J'"-"k>-• n.

OIMr ,unp)ff•K-..., .._,, n11i..~u .. , ,.-ti M«tiK-4 r~Nttc-t~I IHS-At ~10-.l"lflofftD, flll1ga1dr.111 Dfh utaina .,,,.,,,. : f l:tw Ian, r11r APR wllln.:ilth.J,wi. 1.u-.u.1:»yMrrf11tlllD~I.U-~.ln

~IIStd lNlHflill,l:Uue:l'(f"~JNn Mi AIJ,M~l'IWI• •nC10.1..t.if1thn21 l tMIFM.kd~ tt-. •l'd d h • l:Hlagp• , l l'l,L

T1:• l "~=-.1,lf!.~1u1:::1.IIO.O: to ""r'-. ,11+~ 1ro1 10

T111!A.,._..1F'1n.......:I ~':!DC!'!

Un.KICIIUi.i l~'l'Hfflfl .. "Wh1r.•~1-"iLil...111•dD ~l)e-Jt,:W.lt-l .... 'foii'ii!l t-e ot+I .. MD, U~:w:an~J f'•ltT"t .. FM,:rl!::l§J,::,-~t••e-31

ndl11i1C.::lbncu:..1'lL'W L: l l'IUCID'1 • ..ti•·~;p-11, nlta • ..,,,,.N;w-,•;n-•n ... r.allii,:l• "ll .:1

~ .Y.'Dlt"JI~ l'b•~'l SI d• 1.>tt,U1Q!•9'ill F~Atn1 fie! •1 .. ~'l::o-1-.dlr iJ!M..,t'I.

c.,...:.1, =-»r.11M1 I'" ... H 1'-' • tl.:a li:I nlll, ... Nr.nt.ru bf

<Ale~ Jtt!?: t1i c-e-1IT~~ Ir !lll).,~

'roH.1:IN Wl:l'Hj.On.:im~pu,i,;,-n.11.,.p-ra•,, 1,u.r•t, blCiUS<ll )Ill.I h;ie,i, rH~Wi Nl-.4 oliUilO'S-IIM K

1, gNd • bMl-1-1 •lril-•t.

------------

1 /lq11 flj

COMPLAINT Federal Trade Commission Case No. __________ 600 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W. Washington, DC 20580 18 (202) 326-2222

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

33. In fact, many consumers who apply for a loan from Defendant do not know that

Defendant will deduct an up-front fee from their loan proceeds. Indeed, consumers frequently

complain that they only discovered the fee after Defendant disbursed their loan proceeds, when

they noticed that the amounts disbursed were smaller than they were expecting. At least tens of

thousands of consumers contacted Defendant after their loan proceeds were disbursed to ask

about the up-front fee or to ask why they did not receive the full loan amount. Many consumers

who have complained that they were not aware of the up-front fee attempted to cancel their loans

once they learned of the fee, preferring a loan from a competitor or no loan at all.

34. On desktops and mobile phones, after consumers agree to the loan terms and enter bank

account information, they then click a “Done!” button and are taken to a screen that has stated, in

large type: “Your [amount requested] loan is on the way. What’s next?” The amount that

Defendant promises is “on the way” is the same “Loan Amount” that Defendant promised the

consumer on the Loan Offer page. For example, a consumer who was promised a $10,000 loan

amount will see on this screen a representation that “Your $10,000 loan is on the way.” Below

these representations has appeared a “To-Do List” of tasks such as “Confirm your email address”

and “Verify your bank account information.” The contents of the “To-Do List” vary for each

consumer.

Communication of Approval

35. Although Defendant has told each consumer who completed a loan application that his or

her “loan is on the way,” a consumer’s application in fact must undergo two additional processes

after completion in order to receive final approval. First, an application must attract sufficient

investor backing, and second, an application must pass Defendant’s stringent “back-end” credit

review—so called to distinguish it from the lighter, “front-end” review that Defendant conducts

while the consumer’s application is still in progress.

Case 3:18-cv-02454 Document 1 Filed 04/25/18 Page 18 of 30

COMPLAINT Federal Trade Commission Case No. __________ 600 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W. Washington, DC 20580 19 (202) 326-2222

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

36. If a consumer has garnered investor funding—but before Defendant has finished the

“back-end” review of their applications—Defendant has sent such consumers various email

messages communicating that the consumers will receive loans. For example, Defendant has

sent at least approximately 196,000 consumers an email the subject line of which reads “Hooray!

Investors Have Backed Your Loan.” An example of this email appears below.

37. The body of the email begins, in large, bold print, “Your Loan is 100% Backed,” and

continues: “Great news! Investors have backed your loan 100%. Your money is almost in your

hands. You can always visit your Account Summary to view the details of your loan. Welcome

to Lending Club! All the best, Lending Club.” Upon reading this and similar emails, many

consumers have believed that their loans have been approved, and that they would soon receive

their loan funds.

38. In reality, however, many consumers who received such emails were subsequently

rejected based on Defendant’s “back-end” credit review and never received a loan from

Defendant. For example, of the at least approximately 196,000 consumers who received the

above email, at least approximately 43,000 were subsequently rejected. The “back-end” credit

review is searching and often involves, inter alia, an additional credit inquiry, a phone call to the

consumer, requests for additional documentation, and detailed review of the consumer’s tax and

bank records.

Case 3:18-cv-02454 Document 1 Filed 04/25/18 Page 19 of 30

LendingClub

Your Loan is 100% Backed H1Toomy,

Great news! lnves ors have oocked your loan 100%. Yoor money 1s almost in your harids. You can always visit your Aoeount Summ:iry to view the details of your

loon Weloome lo Lending Ck.lb\

Al the bes Leriding C lub

FIND USON:

COMPLAINT Federal Trade Commission Case No. __________ 600 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W. Washington, DC 20580 20 (202) 326-2222

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

39. Defendant frequently issues back-end denials even to consumers who provide Defendant

with all the documents that Defendant requests and whose applications were truthful, based upon

its further evaluation of the consumer. Defendant has also issued back-end denials to consumers

based on errors by Defendant. For example, Defendant acknowledged having incorrectly denied

one consumer’s application on the ground that her mailing address and residential address did

not match when in fact, the consumer lived at a “rural route” address, meaning that she received

mail at a post office box rather than her physical address.

40. Defendant was aware that many consumers believed that they were already approved for

loans when, in fact, they were not. Defendant’s training materials list “What does that mean? I

thought I was approved” as a commonly asked question that customer service representatives

should expect to hear, as shown in the screenshot below.

In addition, Defendant received numerous complaints from consumers who were rejected after

Defendant’s email had led them to believe that their loans were forthcoming and that they were

already approved, including some who did not seek other credit or turned down offers from

Case 3:18-cv-02454 Document 1 Filed 04/25/18 Page 20 of 30

My loan was removed ... App Decisions

"What does that mean? I thought I was approved. "

Initial Review Verified Email Status Verified

ID V Not Required Residence V Not Required

Employment V Not Required Income V Foiled

Bank NameV Not Required Fraud V Not Required

Reserves V Not Required

Actions A dec1s1on has been made O\ler this loan apphcat,on actions are hmrted

Counter Offer Status

None Subnwt ewAmount Assign To

00 0 I Reduce I

06/19/ 14 08 26

Assigned Date 06116/14

Reset Status

Apphcatlon declined Reasons - Income was misstated on the apphcat1on Comments HS

Descfipb<M'I

Bank Accou

Phone V

Income 4

DebtV

Comments

COMPLAINT Federal Trade Commission Case No. __________ 600 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W. Washington, DC 20580 21 (202) 326-2222

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Defendant’s competitors because they believed that they had already obtained a loan from

Defendant.

Defendant’s Unauthorized Bank Account Withdrawals

41. Defendant’s default method of receiving consumers’ scheduled monthly payments is

automatic electronic bank account withdrawal via ACH transfer.

42. In numerous instances, Defendant has withdrawn money from consumers’ bank accounts

without consumers’ authorization, or in amounts in excess of the amount consumers authorized

Defendant to withdraw.

a. In numerous instances, Defendant has charged consumers double payments without

authorization, improperly withdrawing consumers’ monthly payments twice in one

month.

b. In numerous other instances, Defendant has automatically withdrawn consumers’

monthly payment amount even after those consumers have already paid off their loans.

c. In numerous other instances, when consumers have asked Defendant to stop automatic

ACH withdrawals because they wished to pay by check or use a different bank account,

Defendant has disregarded those requests and continued to charge consumers via

automatic withdrawal anyway.

43. Most consumers only learn of Defendant’s unauthorized charges when they check their

bank statements, or when they learn that their accounts have been overdrawn.

44. As a result of Defendant’s unauthorized charges, many consumers are forced to pay

overdraft fees, while other consumers are unable to pay other bills because they do not have

access to the money that Defendant improperly withdrew.

45. Defendant’s internal documents highlight the issue of taking money from consumers’

bank accounts without authorization. Defendant’s monthly complaint reporting reflected a

growing number of complaints about the payoff process and about payment processing more

Case 3:18-cv-02454 Document 1 Filed 04/25/18 Page 21 of 30

COMPLAINT Federal Trade Commission Case No. __________ 600 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W. Washington, DC 20580 22 (202) 326-2222

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

generally. In addition, Defendant’s own payments department self-reported increasing numbers

of such transactions. Defendant’s rate of unauthorized bank withdrawals also has often exceeded

the rates of unauthorized withdrawals made by other companies.

Defendant’s Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (“GLB Act”) Violation

46. Defendant is a financial institution subject to the GLB Act, as that term is defined by

Section 509(3)(A) of the GLB Act, 15 U.S.C. § 6809(3)(A), because, among other things,

Defendant services loans. 12 C.F.R. § 225.28(b)(1). Defendant collects nonpublic personal

information, as defined by 16 C.F.R. § 313.3(n) and 12 C.F.R. § 1016.3(p)(1)-(3), such as Social

Security numbers and bank routing information. Because Defendant is a financial institution that

collects nonpublic personal information, it is subject to the requirements of the GLB Privacy

Rule, 16 C.F.R. Part 313, and Reg. P., 12 C.F.R. Part 1016.

Privacy Rule and Reg. P

47. The Privacy Rule, which implements Sections 501-503 of the GLB Act, 15 U.S.C.

§§ 6801-6803, was promulgated by the Federal Trade Commission on May 24, 2000, and

became effective on July 1, 2001. 16 C.F.R. Part 313. Since the enactment of the Dodd-Frank

Act on July 21, 2010, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”) became responsible

for implementing the Privacy Rule, and promulgated the Privacy of Consumer Financial

Information, Regulation P, 12 C.F.R. Part 1016 (“Reg. P”), which became effective on October

28, 2014. Defendant’s conduct is governed by the Privacy Rule prior to October 28, 2014, and

by Reg. P after that date. The GLB Act authorizes both the CFPB and the Federal Trade

Commission to enforce Reg. P. 15 U.S.C. § 6805.

48. Both the Privacy Rule and Reg. P require financial institutions to provide consumers with

an initial and annual privacy notice. Both the initial and annual privacy notices must be “clear

and conspicuous,” 16 C.F.R. § 313.3(b) and 12 C.F.R. § 1016.3(b), and must “accurately

reflect[] [the financial institution’s] privacy policies and practices.” 16 C.F.R. §§ 313.4 and

313.5 and 12 C.F.R. §§ 1016.4 and 1016.5. The privacy notice must include specified elements,

Case 3:18-cv-02454 Document 1 Filed 04/25/18 Page 22 of 30

COMPLAINT Federal Trade Commission Case No. __________ 600 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W. Washington, DC 20580 23 (202) 326-2222

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

including the categories of nonpublic personal information the financial institution collects and

discloses, the categories of third parties to whom the financial institution discloses the

information, and the security and confidentiality policies of the financial institution. 16 C.F.R.

§ 313.6; 12 C.F.R. § 1016.6. A financial institution must provide its privacy notice so that each

consumer can reasonably be expected to receive actual notice. 16 C.F.R. § 313.9; 12 C.F.R.

§ 1016.9. For consumers who conduct transactions electronically, a consumer can “reasonably

be expected to receive actual notice” if he or she acknowledges receipt of the notice as a

necessary step to obtaining the financial product or service. 16 C.F.R. § 313.9; 12 C.F.R.

§ 1016.9; Privacy of Consumer Financial Information, 65 Fed. Reg. 33646-01, at 33665-66 (May

24, 2000).

49. Defendant failed to comply with the requirements of the Privacy Rule and Reg. P.

Specifically, Defendant failed to deliver the initial privacy notice so that each customer can

reasonably be expected to receive actual notice. 16 C.F.R. § 313.9; 12 C.F.R. § 1016.9. For

example, until at least the end of 2016, Defendant did not require customers to acknowledge

receipt of the notice as a necessary step to obtaining a particular financial product or service. 16

C.F.R. § 313.9, and Reg. P, 12 C.F.R. § 1016.9. Instead, Defendant required customers to agree

only to Defendant’s Terms of Use, which itself included only a link to Defendant’s privacy

policy. In order to reach the privacy notice that Defendant was required to provide to customers,

a customer would need to click on a link that did not indicate it was related to privacy, and then

further find a link to Defendant’s privacy policy within the lengthy document to which the link

led. Customers were not provided a clear and conspicuous privacy notice before they submitted

nonpublic personal information to Defendant.

Case 3:18-cv-02454 Document 1 Filed 04/25/18 Page 23 of 30

COMPLAINT Federal Trade Commission Case No. __________ 600 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W. Washington, DC 20580 24 (202) 326-2222

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

50. Customers were only provided a link leading directly to the notice after they had applied

for a personal loan. Defendant’s own compliance group had recommended repeatedly that the

company require customer acknowledgment in the years prior to the 2016 change.

VIOLATIONS OF THE FTC ACT

51. Section 5(a) of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. § 45(a), prohibits “unfair or deceptive acts or

practices in or affecting commerce.”

52. Misrepresentations or deceptive omissions of material fact constitute deceptive acts or

practices prohibited by Section 5(a) of the FTC Act.

53. Acts or practices are unfair under Section 5 of the FTC Act if they cause or are likely to

cause substantial injury to consumers that consumers cannot reasonably avoid themselves and

that is not outweighed by countervailing benefits to consumers or competition. 15 U.S.C.

§ 45(n).

Count I

Deception: Up-Front Fee

54. In numerous instances in connection with the advertising, marketing, promotion, offering

for sale, or sale of unsecured loans, Defendant has represented, directly or indirectly, expressly

or by implication that consumers will not be charged any hidden fees in connection with

receiving a specific “loan amount.”

Case 3:18-cv-02454 Document 1 Filed 04/25/18 Page 24 of 30

rEI Yes, I agree via electronic signature to

• the Terms Of Use

• the Credit Profile Authorization and for Lending Club to verify my income.

Get Your Rate

wori t.,

COMPLAINT Federal Trade Commission Case No. __________ 600 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W. Washington, DC 20580 25 (202) 326-2222

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

55. In truth and in fact, in numerous instances in which Defendant has made these

representations, consumers have been charged a hidden up-front fee that is deducted from the

“loan amount.”

56. Therefore, Defendant’s representations set forth in Paragraph 54 of this Complaint are

false and misleading and constitute a deceptive act or practice in violation of Section 5(a) of the

FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. § 45(a).

Count II

Deception: Certainty of Loan Approval

57. In numerous instances in connection with the advertising, marketing, promotion, offering

for sale, or sale of unsecured loans, after consumers completed loan applications and Defendant

conducted its front-end review of their applications, but before it had made a final decision

whether to approve their loans, Defendant has represented, directly or indirectly, expressly or by

implication, that those consumers would receive loans.

58. In fact, in numerous instances in which Defendant has made these representations,

Defendant later made a final decision during the back-end review process not to approve the

loans and consumers therefore did not receive loans.

59. Therefore, the making of the representations as set forth in Paragraph 57 of this

Complaint constitutes a deceptive act or practice in or affecting commerce in violation of Section

5(a) of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. § 45(a).

Count III

Unfairness: Unauthorized Charges

60. In numerous instances, Defendant has withdrawn money from borrowers’ bank accounts

without borrowers’ authorization, or in amounts in excess of borrowers’ authorization.

Case 3:18-cv-02454 Document 1 Filed 04/25/18 Page 25 of 30

COMPLAINT Federal Trade Commission Case No. __________ 600 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W. Washington, DC 20580 26 (202) 326-2222

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

61. Defendant’s actions have caused substantial injury to consumers that consumers cannot

reasonably avoid themselves and that is not outweighed by countervailing benefits to consumers

or competition.

62. Therefore, Defendant’s practices as described in Paragraph 60 above constitute unfair

acts or practices in violation of Section 5 of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 45(a) and 45(n).

Count IV

VIOLATIONS OF THE GRAMM-LEACH-BLILEY ACT (“GLB Act”)

PRIVACY RULE AND REG. P

63. As described in Paragraph 48, the Privacy Rule and Reg. P require financial institutions

to provide customers with a clear and conspicuous privacy notice that accurately reflects the

financial institution’s privacy policies and practices. Further, financial institutions must deliver

the privacy notice so that each customer could reasonably be expected to receive actual notice.

64. Defendant is a financial institution, as defined in Section 509(3)(A) of the GLB Act, 15

U.S.C. § 6809(3)(A).

65. As set forth in Paragraph 49, Defendant failed to deliver the initial privacy notice so that

each customer could reasonably be expected to receive actual notice. Therefore Defendant

violated the Privacy Rule, 16 C.F.R. § 313.9, and Regulation P, 12 C.F.R. § 1016.9.

CONSUMER INJURY

66. Consumers have suffered and will continue to suffer substantial injury as a result of

Defendant’s violations of the FTC Act and the Privacy Rule. In addition, Defendant has been

unjustly enriched as a result of their unlawful acts or practices. Absent injunctive relief by this

Court, Defendant is likely to continue to injure consumers, reap unjust enrichment, and harm the

public interest.

Case 3:18-cv-02454 Document 1 Filed 04/25/18 Page 26 of 30

COMPLAINT Federal Trade Commission Case No. __________ 600 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W. Washington, DC 20580 27 (202) 326-2222

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

THIS COURT’S POWER TO GRANT RELIEF

67. Section 13(b) of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. § 53(b), empowers this Court to grant injunctive

and such other relief as the Court may deem appropriate to halt and redress violations of any

provision of law enforced by the FTC. The Court, in the exercise of its equitable jurisdiction,

may award ancillary relief, including rescission or reformation of contracts, restitution, the

refund of monies paid, and the disgorgement of ill-gotten monies, to prevent and remedy any

violation of any provision of law enforced by the FTC.

PRAYER FOR RELIEF

Wherefore, Plaintiff FTC, pursuant to Section 13(b) of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. § 53(b),

the Privacy Rule, Regulation P, and the Court’s own equitable powers, requests that the Court:

A. Award Plaintiff such preliminary injunctive and ancillary relief as may be

necessary to avert the likelihood of consumer injury during the pendency of this action and to

preserve the possibility of effective final relief, including but not limited to, a preliminary

injunction;

B. Enter a permanent injunction to prevent future violations of the FTC Act, the

Privacy Rule, and Regulation P by Defendant;

C. Award such relief as the Court finds necessary to redress injury to consumers

resulting from Defendant’s violations of the FTC Act, the Privacy Rule, and Regulation P

including but not limited to, rescission or reformation of contracts, restitution, the refund of

monies paid, and the disgorgement of ill-gotten monies; and

D. Award Plaintiff the costs of bringing this action, as well as such other and

additional relief as the Court may determine to be just and proper.

Case 3:18-cv-02454 Document 1 Filed 04/25/18 Page 27 of 30

COMPLAINT Federal Trade Commission Case No. __________ 600 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W. Washington, DC 20580 28 (202) 326-2222

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Respectfully submitted,

Dated: April 25, 2018 ALDEN F. ABBOTT

Acting General Counsel

/s/ Katharine Roller KATHARINE ROLLER MATTHEW WILSHIRE DAVID LINCICUM Federal Trade Commission 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20580 Phone: (202) 326-3582, (202) 326-2976, (202) 326-2773 Facsimile: (202) 326-3768 Email: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]

Attorneys for Plaintiff

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

Case 3:18-cv-02454 Document 1 Filed 04/25/18 Page 28 of 30

EXHIBIT A

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Case 3:18-cv-02454 Document 1 Filed 04/25/18 Page 29 of 30

···=L--~"' -c· ~ .b .::: ~,et IU~ng ~u .· PR ' J APPR·OV AL LE R

To-; lli!!lid Unti Pre--Appl"ov;,I Code: S<1m p,le IL S111 ple 3/ 13111 9999-9 999-9'999

Add s ·

I R,1t · : P~pprov- 1 Amount:

123 Any s re~ Fb:~ d

I Up To

Anyto n , us 12345 S:4 0,. 000. ·001

.. .. .. - . . --

We are pleas c:I to infcmn you that you hav~ be n pre- proved Fo your loa11 as sp · cifled be·low:

AMOUNT: You ar pr -approv d fo r up to $40,000 .

DELIVERY: Yo,u,could hav., our cash tn a:; litli~ as 7 days.

t:es re lowe't than m nytrad 'tional bank lo ... ns, is is parlfcul riy fmport flt, ooc u5e using , wilh intere~t r tes of 12.9'KI, 1 S.9%. 18.% or llre cour~ nth • · d How ycu to g t 0:..1 of d bt oon. r.

PURPOSE: V'lhlJe paying o h g intere5<tdebts is the recomnwrided Widge. you c.m put lt lO\ rd h-ome imp:rm _f'nt~, 1n;.jor purc.ha-.es, a VilC:.ttion, or n 011 !

FEES: There are no htdd~r) ees or prepa )'lrnent penalt.i~ .

YPi OF LOAN: This ft!; a no:s;;pll,neral p~ts(mil:11 lo.1n, with low fixed monthly p.lyments and fJ@:l<ii:lle. t<!rm~.

CONSO DATION ADVAINTAGE: If you us yo1Jr loan to pay o fall your c.urr nt er it cards and loans, you'll have only on bill to p.iy@,ch mooth nstead o several, ~Il · ri;i -=tLID..i1J . .b.U. ~i.~~ tbao yoy gay pow_"" You'll find y<H.HS@lf with morl! l:m!athhg mom and l@:ss s.tres.s, omd your family 1.vill njoy he e r .. money you a:n.dd h.w \lery month.

NIEXT STEPS: Simpl,.ii, visit [email protected] and eni.er your Pri!-Approvall Cod~ to get your lnst.~nt loan quote. Ih! - ~ai, ru 1!.'iou 1 ,~ • Q- •

D'EAOUNE: Your Pr .AJ)prov d tatm i v.idfd only un:til3/l $/l 7, nd any quot req; recefved before 3,pm f..a:stem Time on th~t date.

must be

ABO IJ1' •ENDJN.G nus~ Lendlng Clw I~ tne world's large t c nHne .:;n_·~·m m:M{(etpl.ic , and we look fonvard lo s.erving you as w Ila ove 1.6 million ot'1er b-0 ow ~ • We pride our !ves on provfding ex;:,erie,Y e that i!> e slet and !e com~lica d, and oor go.a l s to , elfver the perfect o inatlcm of conv 1l. c , I Mr te . nd frkmdly erv e.

THANK YOIJ FOR VOUR JNTEREST. T.ike th next st~p now }}fr.Questing you.r re-e lo.-n Quote. Rie embet-- thete's no cost or obiigaltfon to 1nd ou t how mudh yOIJ c:ouid save ervery month by ,onsolida i!'lg: you,r high-int re t d bt with or • · liY loan throu9h L" . ir . Club.

Sim:er£~Y, J_ .I .,

. .,.ac.~~<'.Z . ,. .:.;,.· <~~""'-"--,P--

EO, · nding Club

EXHIBIT B

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Case 3:18-cv-02454 Document 1 Filed 04/25/18 Page 30 of 30

While others make it easy to get into debt.

We make it easier to, get out.

1;11LendlingClub

<Sample A.Sample> <Address;,,

<Address2>

<Anytown, US 12345-1234>

11111 1lnl,llll•l·lh•lhll1•1•• 1hln1••1••·· lwllllM1ln11

PRE-APPROVED FOR

¥6$20,000 Respond by (Raspond_byl

at MylnstantOffar.com

Your pre-approval coda: [1I234-5678-9ABC]

<Fname>, let us help you pay off your debt faster and you too could save hundreds, even thousands.

You'ra alraady pra-approvad

You've been selected for this offer because of your good credit history.

I •

No hiddan ,_ or

P"-P•ymant p•naltin

We offer llexible loan amounts and terms. there are NO hidden fees and 110

penal~es for paying off your loan early.

Pay off high-int•rnt d•bt

Simplify your life - use your loan for debt consolidation, pay,ing off credit

cards or even a major purchase.

$ S.V• hundrads, •v•n t1housands

When you pay off your debt faster you could save hundreds. even

thousands in interest.

Apply onlin1e today- it's fast, easy and only talkes minutes. Don't wait too long,. this offer expires [Respond_by].

r,:i --Go Online Get your l1oan qiuote onl in e: MylnmintOtfer.mm

PnrApproval Code-: [1234-5678-9ABq

By Phone 855-363-4151

Oedk:ated !JS-liaised d ient adY'isor

By Mail Compl!!te and re tum the attached Rl!ply card