Carpark Guide291004

7/22/2019 Carpark Guide291004

1/58

ECONOMICAL CARPARKSA Design Guide


2/58

Economical Carpark

A Design Guide2nd Edition


3/58

Disclaimer:


4/58

CONTENTS

FOREWORD ........................................................iv

1. INTRODUCTION............................................. 1

1.1 Steel Carparks ........................................ 1

1.2 Layouts ................................................... 2

1.2.1 Column Location ............................ 2

1.2.2 Headroom....................................... 3

1.2.3 Ramps & Circulation ....................... 3

1.2.4 Gradients (excluding Ramps) ......... 3

1.3 Parking Modules .................................... 4

1.3.1 Single Module Schemes................. 51.3.2 Multiple Module Schemes .............. 6

1.3.3 Carpark Space Utilisation

Efficiency ........................................ 6

2. CARPARK SCHEMES AND COSTING .......... 7

2.1 Schemes ................................................. 7

2.2 Costing .................................................. 10

2.3 Engineering Drawings ......................... 10

3. DESIGN EXAMPLES .................................... 27

3.1 Example 1 ............................................. 29

3.2 Example 2 ............................................. 30

APPEN

A. STR

A.1

A.2

A.3

A.4

A.5

A.6

B. DURB.1

B.2

B.3

B.4

C. FIR

C.1

C.2

D. COS

D.1

D.2

D.3

D.4

D.5


5/58

FOREWORD

In 1998, BHP Integrated Steel published the First

Edition of Economical Carparks A Design Guide.Since its release countless developers and

designers have utilised the publication to assist in

the design and construction of carparks. Over the

last seven years there have been some significant

changes in design, construction techniques and in

supply of the materials required to construct these

carparks.

This Edition of the Design Guide is now publishedby OneSteel Market Mills who are the largest

manufacturer of the structural steel beams

referenced in this Guide. The standard base

material for the decking profiles have changed, as

has the number of different decking profiles

available. The Australian Design Standards have

also changed making it necessary to amend some

of the design drawings. Also two new schemes

offering column free parking spaces have beenincluded in this Edition taking the total number of

schemes to eleven.

This Edit

as well commen

OneStee

people w

the Firs

particula

Ian Benn

Chong CJohn Co

Spiros D

Anthony

Nick van

Imran Sa

Ken Wat

Gary Yum


6/58


7/58

1.2 Layouts

The Australian/New Zealand Standard

AS/NZS 2890.1:2004 provides guidance andminimum requirements for the design and layout ofoff-street parking facilities including multi-storeycarparks. It classifies car parking facilities accordingto the type of use as shown in Table 1. Parkingspace and aisle widths are also given for each class.The nominal length of a parking space is 5.4m.

The following discussion covers some of the major

requirements of the code which have a significantimpact on the design of a multi-storey carpark.

1.2.1 Co

The locacritical defunctiona

Construcfollowing

improv increas ease o

better s greatefloor sp

User Class Examples of Uses

1 Generally all day parkinge.g. tenant, employee and commuterparking, universities

1A Residential, domestic and employee parking- 3 point turn entry & exit

2 Generally medium term parkinge.g. long term city and town parking, sportsfacilities, entertainment centres, hotels,motels, airport visitors


8/58


9/58

1.3 Parking Modules

A parking module is defined in AS/NZS 2890.1:2004

as a parking aisle together with a single row ofparking spaces on one or both sides. In thisdocument only parking on both sides of the aisle isconsidered. The parking module excludes anyramps or circulation roadways which take off withinthe module.

Many variations could be developed for the differentclasses of carpark to cover all situations. In this

document, a user Class 3 module for parking at thepreferred angle of 90oto the aisle is considered.The standard module in this publication consistsof:

Parking space width 2.6mParking space length 5.4mAisle width 5.8mParking module length 16.6m (2x5.4 + 5.8)

This conpractical given in adopted

that the AS/NZS this adopadjusted beams afor the asquare msmall cha

The othstandardWhilst thcolumns eight levallowed columns width.

Module Type Scheme Description

2 car

SINGLE Internal and edge columns, -Figure 3(a)

Internal columns and cantilever edges -

Figure 3(b)


10/58

Carpark layouts can be divided into single andmultiple module designs:

1.3.1 Single Module Schemes

Three different single module schemes have beendeveloped, viz:

Scheme S1 - Internal columns with edge columns,see Figure 3(a);

Scheme S2 - Internal columns with cantilevers,see Figure 3(b); and

Scheme S3 - Clear span with edge columns,see Figure 3(c).

These schemes were developed for various baywidths as shown in Table 2.

A carpark may consist of a number of singlemodules as shown in Figure 4, each moduleconsisting of an aisle and a row of parking each

side. These modules can either be horizontal; seeFigure 4(a), or sloped to form a long ramp betweenthe different levels; see Figure 4(b) & 4(c). Thesingle modules provide considerable flexibility inachieving different layouts.

(a) Horiz

Bay

(b) Slop

(a) Scheme S1

(b) Scheme S2

Aisle

16600mm, Single Module


11/58

1.3.2 Multiple Module Schemes

Multiple module schemes are used when there area number of aisles in the same plane. They areoften used at shopping centres, hospitals andeducational institutions where the carparks arerelatively large in plan compared to their height.

Two different multiple module schemes have beendeveloped viz:

Scheme S4 - Internal columns with edge columns,

see Figure 5(a); and Scheme S5 - Internal columns with cantilevers,see Figure 5(b).

1.3.3 Carpark Space Utilisation Efficiency

Table 3 gives the square metres per car spacetogether with their relative module efficiency, foreach of the schemes. It can be seen that Schemes

S3A, S3B and S3C provide up to 4% more carspace in a given area. This is the most efficientscheme as the columns do not impinge on thedesign envelope (see Figure 1).

Reference

Standards Australia/Standards New Zealand 2004,

AS/NZS 2890 1 2004 P ki f iliti Off t t

(a) Scheme S4

(b) Scheme S5

Figure 5 - Multiple Module Schemes

Scheme Square metres Relative moduleper car space efficiency

S1A 22.4 96%S1B 22.2 97%S1C 22.1 98%S2 22.4 96%

S3A 21.6 100%

S3B 21 6 100%

AisleAisle

16600mm ModuleNext Module


12/58

2. CARPARK SCHEMES AND

COSTING

2.1 Schemes

Eleven carpark schemes, as shown in Figure 6,have been designed and costed. The engineeringdrawings for each of thses schemes are given inSection 2.3.


13/58

SCHEME

Scheme S1B: 4 car spaces per module widthRefer to Drawing 1B (page 12)

Schem

SCHEME 1: SINGLE MODULE

Scheme S1A: 3 car spaces per module widthRefer to Drawing 1A (page 11)


14/58

SCHEME 3: SINGLE MODULE





Scheme S

SCHEME 4: MULTIPLE MODULE SCHEME 5


15/58

Scheme Description Floor Costs Column Costs

$/m2

$/m2

for No. of StoreysBeams Decking Slab TOTAL 2 4 6 8

SINGLE MODULES

S1A 3 Spaces/Bay 83 40 55 178 12 15 17 19

S1B 4 Spaces/Bay 81 40 55 176 9 12 15 17

S1C 5 Spaces/Bay 101 40 55 195 9 12 14 17

S2 Cantilever 3 Spaces/Bay 94 40 55 189 10 11 12 15

S3A 2 Spaces/Bay 73 49 58 180 22 19 24 25

S3B 3 Spaces/Bay 132 40 55 226 8 10 12 14

S3C 4 Spaces/Bay 135 40 55 230 7 9 10 13

MULTIPLE MODULES

S4A 3 Spaces/Bay 84 39 55 177 9 12 15 19

S4B 4 Spaces/Bay 80 39 55 174 8 11 15 18

2.2 Costing

The cost of each of the eleven schemes has been

calculated on a square metre rate for 2, 4, 6 and 8storey high carparks. The results are presented inTable 4.

The costing has been done on the basis of usingBONDEKprofiled steel decking.

2.3 Engineering Drawings

The schemes have been designed in accordance

with the criteria given in Appendix A.


16/58


17/58


18/58


19/58


20/58


21/58


22/58


23/58


24/58


25/58


26/58


27/58


28/58


29/58


30/58


31/58


32/58

3. DESIGN EXAMPLES

Figures 6(a) & (b) show a flowchart outlining thetypical steps involved in arriving at a suitablepreliminary design.

Two design examples are provided in this Sectionto illustrate how the information in this Design Guidemay be used.


33/58

Is it astand alone

open-deck* or

sprinklered*carpark?

Is it asingle

module?

Arethere edgecolumns?

Arethere edgecolumns?

Arethere internal

columns?

STEP 1

STEP 2

STEP 3

STEP 3a

YES

NO

NOYES

YES YESNO NO

YES NO

Refer to Appendix C, Section C2Then use the appropriatesections of the guide & if requireddetermine extent of fire protection

S

S


34/58

The figure above shows diagrammatically the architects requirements for an8 storey carpark.

The carpark is to be open deck. The surface treatment to be appropriate for atmospheric Category C. No penetrations in primary beams required. Edge columns are permitted.

Preliminary design(see flow chart in Figure 6a):

Preliminary costing(see flow cha

STEP 6 The cost of 8 suspendeA scheme may be seleclayout. Scheme selecte

C1

PB1

C1

PB2

C2

PB1

B1

B1

B1

C2 C1C1

PB2

B1

B2

Secondary Beams

Primary Beams

310UC11

350WC193 & 4

5 & 6

Level Column C

7 & 8

1 & 2

200UC59

350WC23

Bay

Width

4150 mm 8300mm

Project Name: Carpark Design Guide Job No: CDG1Subject: EXAMPLE 1 Page: 1/2

Designed: AN Date: 1/10/98

3.1 Example 1

Design Constraints

Project Name:

Subject:

Designed:

33.2m 60m


35/58



Project Name:

Subject:

Designed:

A developer requires a carpark to suit the following criteria:- 4 suspended levels. Site is 34m x 75m with 3% fall across the 34m. Facade to be out of light weight steel up to barrier height only open deck

carpark. Surface treatment to be appropriate for atmospheric Category C with top coat

Preliminary design(see flow cha

STEP 1 Is it an open deck carpYes, a requirement of t

STEP 2 Is it a single module ca

Since it is 34m wide it ca multiple module of 2. across the site and alsintrude into the aisle wi

STEP 3 Are edge columns allowThere is no requirementherefore use scheme columns result in a mo

STEP 3a Are internal columns aAgain there are no requwith internal columns a

However if maximum flewould be the preferred most economical optiobe considered.

STEP 4 Schemes S1A, S1B an

3.2 Example 2

Design Constraints

NaturalGround


36/58



Project Name:

Subject:

Designed:

L4.5

L3.5

L2.5

L1.5

GROUND

L4

L3

L2

L1

GROUND NATURAL

GROUNDC2 C1 C1

C2a C1 C1 C2

C2

C1

C1

C2a

C1

C1

C2

C2

C2

C1

C1

C2a C

1C1

B1

B1

B1

B1

B1

2/B1

B1

B1

B1

B1

B1

B2

B2

PB1 PB2 PB2 PB1 PB2PB2

PB2 PB1 PB2 PB2 PB1 PB2

10700m

16600mm 16600mm

Mark Size Studs Camber

Primary Beams PB1 460UB82.1 36 20 mm

Secondary Beams B1 360UB50.7 26 50mm

PB2 410UB53.7 - ncu

B2 360UB44.7 - 40mm

Bay

Width

STEP 5 Columns for a 4 level ca(Contd.)

The table on drawingFor a 4 level carpark

For the C2a which is carpark, use the sam

This gives:

3

2

Level

1

4

The 10.7m bays can

Preliminary costing(see flow cha

STEP 6 The cost of a scheme is

STEP 7 Adjust base cost usingsurface coating and Ta


37/58


38/58


39/58

Refer to Appendix B on durability for details ofshrinkage-and-temperature and other crack-controlreinforcement.

A.4 Columns

The columns have been designed in accordancewith AS 4100-1998. Allowance has been made forpattern loading and a maximum floor-to-floor heightof 3m when determining their size.

The columns have been designed for the vertical

loads of an eight level carpark. The designs can beused for carparks with fewer levels by using sizecorresponding to the top levels e.g. for a two levelcarpark, the appropriate columns are those requiredfor levels 7 and 8. Whilst the column size is givenin increments of 2 levels, it may be more economicalin some cases to remove the column splice(s) andrun the heavier column all the way up. The practicallimit for this approach is 6 levels. This is discussed

in more detail in D.5.

The column splices have been incorporated in thedepth of the slab for aesthetic and functionalreasons.

Edge columns in single module schemes have onlybeen designed for that situation. Where twomodules abut (for example combination single

TubularHandrail

Support Landingon Steelwork orHang from abov

Stringer200x100 Flat or200PFC


40/58

A.5 Lateral Load Resisting Systems

The designs in this Guide only cover verticalloadings. Lateral load-resisting systems can utilise

ramps, shear walls and steel moment or bracedframes. Generally, braced frames are moreeconomical than moment frames. Braced framescan be located along the perimeter of a carpark oralong the column lines.

A.6 Stairs

To match the speed of construction offered by steel,it is common practice to adopt steel stair systems.These fall into two categories viz.:

Formwork systems such as Stairmetal Formwork

(Aus Iron Industries Pty Ltd, Melbourne -http://www.ausironindustries.com.au).

Steel stairs as shown in Figure A2. These allow

safe access to all floors during construction, aswell as providing permanent access. They areoften fully assembled in the fabrication shop andlifted directly into place on site.

References

Australian Building Code Board 2004, BuildingCode of Australia, Volume 1: Class 2 to Class 9

/www.onesteel.com/productspecs.asp?specID=54

BlueScope Steel 2003, Using BONDEK - Design &Construction Guide, BlueScope Steel Limited,

Avai lable: http :/ /www.bluescopesteel.com.au(registration required)

Chick, C. G., Dayawansa, P. H. & Patrick, M. 1998,Structural Design of Simply-supported CompositeBeams with Large Steel Web Penetrations,Australasian Structural Engineering Conference,Auckland, New Zealand, pp. 159-166

Hogan, T. J. & Thomas, I. R. 1994, Design ofStructural Connections, 4thedn, Australian Instituteof Steel Construction, North Sydney

Murray, T. M., Allen, D. E. & Ungar, E. E. 1997, FloorVibrations due to Human Activity, Steel ConstructionGuide Series 11, AISC/CISC, Chicago

Standards Australia 1981, AS 1250-1981(superceded) SAA Structural Steel Code, SAI,Sydney

Standards Australia 2003, AS 2327.1-2003Composite structures - Simply supported beams,SAI, Sydney

Standards Australia 2001,AS 3600-2001 Concrete


41/58


42/58


43/58

functional system where aesthetics are lessimportant;

Class 2.5 blast clean followed by 50m epoxy

zinc and 50m 2 pack acrylic (epoxy cross linked

catalysed acrylic) to provide an architectural finishin a range of colours

Szokolik (1997) has shown that a single coat ofwater borne inorganic zinc silicate will out performmulti-coat systems. However the multi-coat systemis given for situations where a different colour topcoat is desired.

Table B2 is a guide only. The corrosion protectionsystem should be designed in accordance with AS/NZS 2312:2002. Labour rather than material costdrives the applied cost of coating systems. Oftensimilar corrosion resistance can be achievedindependent of aesthetics.

Reference should be made to Appendix D for costs

of alternate coating systems

B.4 Monitoring

In accordance with normal practice, an inspectionwould be undertaken towards the end of thecontract defects-liability period. This should identifyitems which require ongoing monitoring such asexpansion joints.

Proe, D. J., Patrick, M. & Goh, C. C. 1997,Simplified Design of Continuous Composite Slabsincluding Moment Redistribution and Crack

Control, Fifteenth Australasian Conference on theMechanics of Structures and Materials, Melbourne,pp. 147-152

Standards Australia 1997, AS 1627.0-1997 Metalfinishing - Preparation and pretreatment of surfaces

- Method selection guide, SAI, Sydney

Standards Australia/Standards New Zealand 2002,

AS/NZS 2312:2002 Guide to the protection ofstructural steel against atmospheric corrosion by

the use of protective coatings, SAI, Sydney

Szokolik, A. & Rapattoni, F. 1997, Single-coatInorganic Zic Silicate. Is this the Definitive Answerfor Surface Protection of Steel Bridges?,Preceedings of the 1997 Bridge Conference,Sydney


44/58


45/58

C. FIRE-RESISTANCE

REQUIREMENTS

C.1 Open-deck or SprinkleredCarparks

According to the Building Code of Australia (2004),open-deck and sprinklered carparks can beconstructed from bare steel construction providedthat the columns and beams achieve certainrequirements with respect to their surface-area-to-mass ratio.

The BCA defines an open-deck carpark as a carparkwhich is cross ventilated using two approximatelyopposite sides. The sides that provide ventilationmust be at least 1/6 of the area of any other sideand the opening must be at least 1/2 of the wallarea (see Figure C1).

Appendix C

C2 No

Sprink

The desito carpasprinklestructuracarparkssprinklerein detail Carparks& Thom

consulterequired

Refere

AustraliaCode of Buildings

BennettsEconom

OneStee/www.on


46/58


47/58


48/58

D.3 Dif

System

The cost has a maThe cost schemesthat an aflange anhas beenexcept foless than

membersattractiveneed to b

D4 Pen

The cost of steel bthe cost penetratrectangugenerallyin a carpprimarypenetratin the ordentire car

Table D2 - Surface Treatment Costs

Scheme Protection System Costs $/m2

Atmospheric Corrosivity Category Add. Top Add. Top Hot-dip

A B C D/F E Coat A1 Coat Oth2 Galvanized

S1A 9 14 15 20 21 8 11 14S1B 10 15 16 21 23 9 12 14S1C 12 18 20 25 27 12 16 25S2 10 15 16 21 22 9 12 16

S3A 6 9 10 13 14 6 8 12S3B 14 22 24 32 34 14 19 31S3C 14 21 23 31 33 14 19 30S4A 10 15 16 21 22 9 12 15S4B 10 15 17 21 23 9 12 15

S4C 11 17 18 24 25 11 15 23S5 9 14 15 20 21 9 12 15

Penetrations Unreinforced Reinforced

Section mass Circular Rectangular Rectangular Rectangular Rectangular

(kg/m) Hours $ Hours $ Hours $ Hours $ Hours $

< 60.5 0.4 24 0.7 42 2.0 120 3.4 204 4.2 25260.6 to 160 0.5 30 0.8 48 2.4 144 4.1 246 5.7 342160.1 to 455 0.7 42 1.2 72 3.7 222 6.1 366 8.5 510

Diagram

Notes:1. Cost of additional top coat applied over Category A finish2. Cost of additional top coat applied over all other surface finishes except Hot-dip Galvanized


49/58

and $800. Therefore, in general it is better tominimise the number of splices rather than the massof the column.

The maximum length of column section that isreadily available and still easy to handle is 18metres. Therefore, it is recommended that forcarparks less than four levels high, the columnsare made from one length (without splices). With asix level carpark, the cost of a non-prismatic columnwith splices is similar to that of a prismaticcontinuous column. The choice will depend on thescheme being adopted and the time allowed for

fabrication and erection. For an eight level carpark,it is suggested that a splice be provided at mid-length for maximum economy.

References

Watson, K. B., Dallas, S. van der Kreek, N. & Main,T. 1996, Costing of Steelwork from Feasibility

through to Completion, Journal of AustralianInstitute of Steel Construction, vol. 30, no. 2


50/58

E. SURVEY OF EXISTING

CARPARKS

There have been a significant number of steelcarparks constructed in Australia and New Zealandof various configurations in plan and elevation. Thisappendix lists many of these carparks.

Information on these are presented in tables, foreach state of Australia, and one for New Zealand.These tables provide available information on eachof the carparks.

Appendix E


51/58

ACT

Dickson Shopping Centre, Dickson, Canberra 4 326 1996 Precas

Woden Valley Hospital, Woden Valley 2 350 1994 Tensio

on stee

Manuka Carpark, Corner Furneau & Bouganville Road, Manuka 1 170 1993 Compo

ANU Carpark, ANU, Canberra 3 330 1985 PrecasNational Gallery of Australia, Parkes Place, Canberra 1 1974 Cast in

City West Carpark, Civic, Canberra 5 1100 Compo

Northern Territory

K- Mart, Palmerston, Darwin 1 400 1998 Compo

Queensland

Gary Crick Auto 1 150 2003 Compo

Capalaba Shopping Centre, Capalaba, Brisbane 1 200 1995 Compo

Petrie Rail Interchange, Petrie 1 270 1993 Precas

St Andrews Hospital, North St, Spring Hill 1 42 1993 Precas

City Centre Plaza, Rockhampton 2 330 1990 Compo

Mal Burke, Southport 1 90 1988 Precas

Rockhampton Shopping Centre 1 300 1987 Compo

Noof

Suspended

Steel

Carpark

Levels

Noof

CarSpaces

Open

Close

d

Stand

alone

Multiu

se

Yearof

Construction

Name

/Location Carpark Type


52/58

New South Wales

Nowra Fair Shopping Centre, Haigh St, Nowra 1 80 2000 Co

Cowra Carpark, Busby Place, Cowra 1 70 Co

Westfields Hornsby Carpark Extension 1 150 2001 Co

Albury Commercial Club Carpark, Albury 2 160 2001 Co

TNT Office Carpark, Mascot 3 200 2000 Co

Parramatta RSL Carpark, Parramatta 3 190 2000 Co

Prince of Wales Carpark, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick 2 270 1998 Co

Big W Retail Carpark, Griffith 1 360 1997 Co

King Street Carpark, King Street, Newcastle 3.5 160 1997 Co

Mascot Airport Carpark -Stage 4, Keith Smith Avenue, Domestic Terminal, Mascot 4 1997 Str

HIA Building & Renovata Supa Centre, Homebush Bay 2 190 1996 Co

Liverpool Hospital Carpark, Liverpool 3 456 1995 Pre

Thornleigh Railway Station, Yarrara Street, Thornleigh 2 1994 Pre

Murwillumbah Hospital Carpark, Murwillumbah 2 80 1991 Pre

Bankstown City Council Carpark, Brandon Avenue, Bankstown 3 240 1988 Co

Blacktown City Council Carpark, Nelson Lane, Blacktown 4 500 1987 Ca

IBM Carpark, Coonara Avenue, West Pennant Hills 8 630 1987 Ca

Novotel Hotel Carpark, Darling Harbour 4 1800 1987 Co

Noof

Suspended

Steel

Carpark

Level

s

Noof

CarSpaces

Open

Close

d

Stand

alone

Multiu

se

Yearof

Construction

Name



53/58

South Australia

Mt Barker Carpark, Cnr. Druids Ave & Adelaide Rd 1 286 2003 Composite

The Royal Adelaide Hospital Carpark 9 1440 2002 Composite

Mill Street Auto Park 8 519 2001 Composite

Christian Brothers Sport Centre, Flinders St 1 120 1998 Composite

EDS, North Terrace, Adelaide 4 245 1998 Composite

Mt Gambier 1 302 1998 Composite

Salvation Army, Pirie St 1998 Composite

Adelaide University, Frome St, Adelaide 6 500 1997 Composite

Childrens Hospital, Kermode St, Nth Adelaide 5 125 1995 Composite

Hindley Plaza, Clubhouse Lane 6 294 1995 Composite

2 Floor Extension, Grenfell St 2 120 1992 Composite

Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park 4 420 1991 Composite

Blyght St 5 1990 Composite

Childrens Hospital, Kermode St, Nth Adelaide 5 400 1989 Composite

Playhouse Lane, Light Sq. 7 375 1989 Composite

Wyatt St 4 760 1989 Precast

Roper St 7 644 1988 Precast

Southgate, South Terrace, Adelaide 4 320 1987 Composite

Noof

Suspended

Steel

Carpark

Level

s

Noof

CarSpaces

Open

Close

d

Stand

alone

Multiuse

Yearof

Construction

Name



54/58

Victoria

Deakin University, Melbourne Campus, Burwood 3 2003 Compo

Federation Square Russell St Extn, Melbourne 3 2003 Compo

Little Lonsdale St, Melbourne AddaTop 6 2003 Compo

Monash University, Clayton Campus North West Section 1 2 2003 Compo

Deakin University, Melbourne Campus, Burwood 3 2002 Compo

Grocon QV Tentants BHP Billiton, Melbourne 5 2002 Compo

Klopfer & Dobos Waverley Rd, Glen Waverley 1 15 2002 Compo

Monash University, Clayton Campus North West Section 1 2 2001 Compo

Pran Central Wattle St, Prahran 2 2001 Compo

Hickory Developments Cnr Smithfield & Epsom Rds, Kensington 1 36 2001 Non co

Salta Properties Cook St, Port Melbourne 2 2001 Compo

209 Kings Way South, Melbourne 6 2001 Compo

Blakford 370 Queen St, Melbourne 2 2001 Compo

Deakin University, Burwood Hwy, Burwood 2 587 1998 Compo

Blessed Sacrament Fathers - St Francis 312, Lonsdale St, Melbourne 6 530 1992 Non co

Maroondah Hospital, Mt Dandenong Rd, Ringwood 1 1992 Non co

Heidelberg City Council, 21 Yarra Bvd, Heidelberg 1 1991 Compo

Watt Street Carpark, Watt St, Box Hill 4 1991 Compo

Noof

Suspended

Steel

Carpark

Level

s

Noof

CarSpaces

Open

Close

d

Stand

alone

Multiuse

Yearof

Construction

Name



55/58

Victoria (Contd.)

Grand Mercure Hotel, 333 Collins St, Melbourne 5 364 1990 Compo

Macedon Square Shopping Centre, Manningham Rd, Templestowe Lower 1 1990 Compo

17 Burgundy St, Heidelburg 1 1989 Compo

9 Porter St, Dandenong 2 1989 Compo

Burwood Highway, Knoxfield 1 1989 Compo

Commercial Union Assurance Co of Australia, Lonsdale St, Melbourne 3 1989 Compo

Jolimont St, East Melbourne 1 1989 Compo

Mt Eliza Way & Canadian, Mt Eliza 1 1989 Compo

Carlton & United Breweries, Flockhart St, Abbotsford 4 450 1988 Compo

Cnr Kooyong & High Sts, Armadale 1 1987 Compo

Victorian Operative Bricklayers Society, Bary St, Carlton 6 1987 Compo

Chambers St, South Yarra 2 20

Tasmania

Hobart City Council, Argyle St Carpark Extension, Hobart 2 1994 Compo

Launceston City Council, Paterson St West Carpark, Launceston 6

Western Australia

Collie Street, Fremantle 9 split level 448 2003 Compo

Call Centre, Bunbury 1 2003 Compo

Noof

Suspended

Steel

Carpark

Level

s

Noof

CarSpaces

Open

Close

d

Stand

alone

Multiuse

Yearof

Cons

truction

Name



56/58

New Zealand

St Mathews Carpark, Hobson St, Auckland 4 131 1996 Speedfloor trusses with 90 m

Teachers College Carpark, Union St East, Dunedin 2 3000 1996 130mm slab on HiBond 0.75

Newmarket Carpark, Broadway, Auckland 6 507 1996 130mm slab on HiBond 0.75

Arthur Barnetts, George St, Dunedin 4 456 1996 130 mm topping on 0.95mm

Watt St Carpark, Watts St, Auckland 3 99 1995 Speedfloor trusses with 90 m

Great King St Carpark, Great King St, Dunedin 4 360 1994 130 topping on HiBond

Skycity Carpark, Hob St, Auckland 5 1998 1994 130 -200 mm topping on 0.7

Wakefield Street, Wakefield St, Auckland 6 350 1986 HiBond

Noof

Suspended

Steel

Carpark

Levels

Noof

CarSpaces

Open

Close

d

Stand

alone

Multiuse

Yearof

Cons

truction

Floor

System

Table E6 Survey of Existing Carparks New Zealand

Name



57/58

Appendix F F. EXAMPLES OF RAMPCONFIGURATIONS

Common ramp configurations for both one-way andtwo-way traffic flow are presented in this appendix

Figure F1 - Examples of Ramp Configurations

for Combined Single Module Split level

carparks (refer to Figure 4a)

Figure

(a) One way traffic flow - Fast exit (b) One way traffic flow - Scissor ramp


58/58

FOR MORE INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT:

ONESTEEL DIRECT

39-45 Flagstaff Road Port Kembla NSW 2505

Locked Bag 8825 South Coast Mail Centre NSW 2521

Phone: 1800 1 STEEL (1800 1 78335) Fax: 1800 101 141

E-mail: [email protected]

Website: www.onesteel.com

9

3

2

0

0

7

5

0

4

1

7

0

0

Carpark Guide291004

Documents

Transcript of Carpark Guide291004