Caribbean Hotel Benchmark Survey
-
Upload
marinet-ltd -
Category
Travel
-
view
895 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Caribbean Hotel Benchmark Survey
KPMG’s 2011 Caribbean Hotel Benchmarking
Survey
Travel, Leisure and TourismAugust 2011
KPMG INTERNATIONAL
1│KPMG’s 2011 Caribbean Hotel Benchmarking Survey
KPMG’s 2011 Caribbean Hotel
Benchmarking Survey
Dear Reader:
KPMG’s Caribbean Travel, Leisure and Tourism group is pleased to present the results of the 2011 Caribbean Hotel Benchmarking Survey, which has been designed to help owners, operators, lenders and investors better understand the profi le and performance of hotels in the Caribbean.
Since releasing our last survey several Caribbean destinations have begun to show signs of stabilization with increased visitors and occupancies. However, the hotel industry continues to operate in diffi cult times with challenges of lower daily rates, falling visitor spend and higher operating costs leading to reduced profi tability in 2010. Nevertheless, most Survey participants do expect to see signifi cant improvement in market conditions over the next 12 to 24 months and several are investing in order to capture some of this anticipated growth. What is clear, however, is that there are no “quick fi x” solutions for the region and improvements will take time and a lot of hard work and will, in many ways, depend on global economic conditions and developments.
We take this opportunity to say a special thank you to our Survey participants (who will also receive a more detailed analysis of the fi nancial results separately). We welcome participation from additional properties for future surveys.
If you have any questions concerning the Survey please contact us or your local KPMG offi ce listed on the back page.
Sincerely,
Charlene Lewis-SmallAssociate DirectorKPMG in The Bahamas
Gary BroughManaging DirectorKPMG in The Turks and Caicos Islands
KPMG’s 2011 Caribbean Hotel Benchmarking Survey │2
Overview
Methodology
KPMG’s Travel, Leisure and Tourism practice in the Caribbean conducted benchmark surveys into the region’s hospitality industry. Financial information for 2009 and 2010 was collected from hotel properties in various Caribbean jurisdictions.
This report is based on the survey data collected. Financial information was analyzed on a consolidated basis and is based on a non-weighted average (mean) of the number of properties.
Financial information is presented in accordance with the tenth edition of the Uniform System of Accounts for the Lodging Industry (USALI). Survey responses were reclassifi ed according to USALI where necessary.
The Survey responses were not audited.
3│KPMG’s 2011 Caribbean Hotel Benchmarking Survey
Property type Caribbean location
Source: KPMG International, KPMG’s 2011 Caribbean Hotel Benchmarking Survey. Source: KPMG International, KPMG’s 2011 Caribbean Hotel Benchmarking Survey.
Profi le of survey respondents
All inclusive11%
Full service59%
Select service22%
Limited service
4%
Other 4%
English-speaking67%
Spanish-speaking18%
Dutch-speaking11%
French-speaking4%
KPMG’s 2011 Caribbean Hotel Benchmarking Survey │4
Ownership/management structure
Hotel size
Source: KPMG International, KPMG’s 2011 Caribbean Hotel Benchmarking Survey.
Source: KPMG International, KPMG’s 2011 Caribbean Hotel Benchmarking Survey.
Independent operator with
franchise4%
Independent operator without
franchise52%
Managed by international
chain36%
Part of privately owned chain
8%
Under 75 rooms56%
75-199 rooms30%
200-399 rooms
7%
400 or over rooms
7%
5│KPMG’s 2011 Caribbean Hotel Benchmarking Survey
Average number of available rooms
Average number of full time employees
Source: KPMG International, KPMG’s 2011 Caribbean Hotel Benchmarking Survey.
Source: KPMG International, KPMG’s 2011 Caribbean Hotel Benchmarking Survey.
2009 2010120
121
122
123
124
125
20102009160
161
162
163
164
165
166
Num
ber o
f em
ploy
ees
KPMG’s 2011 Caribbean Hotel Benchmarking Survey │6
Primary guest market
Rating Primary guest segment
Source: KPMG International, KPMG’s 2011 Caribbean Hotel Benchmarking Survey.
Source: KPMG International, KPMG’s 2011 Caribbean Hotel Benchmarking Survey.Source: KPMG International, KPMG’s 2011 Caribbean Hotel Benchmarking Survey.
3 star29%
4 star 42%
5 star29%
Corporate/business
17%
Leisure/independent
83%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
USA UK Canada Europe Other
7│KPMG’s 2011 Caribbean Hotel Benchmarking Survey
Benchmarking results
Approximately two-thirds of participating hotels reported that 2010’s performance did not meet budget.
The 3% increase in RevPAR includes the combined effect of a 1% dip in ADR against a 4% increase in occupancy.
How did 2010’s performance compare to budget?
Occupancy
Source: KPMG International, KPMG’s 2011 Caribbean Hotel Benchmarking Survey.
Source: KPMG International, KPMG’s 2011 Caribbean Hotel Benchmarking Survey.
2009 201055%
56%
57%
58%
59%
60%
61%
62%
63%
64%
65%
1
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
Much worse than expected
Somewhat worse than expected
Same as expected
Somewhat better than expected
Much better than expected
Much worse than expected
Somewhat worse than expected
Same as expected
Somewhat better than expected
Much better than expected
KPMG’s 2011 Caribbean Hotel Benchmarking Survey │8
ADR RevPAR
Source: KPMG International, KPMG’s 2011 Caribbean Hotel Benchmarking Survey.Source: KPMG International, KPMG’s 2011 Caribbean Hotel Benchmarking Survey.
2009 2010$325
$330
$335
$340
$345
$350
US$
20102009$200
$205
$210
$215
US$
9│KPMG’s 2011 Caribbean Hotel Benchmarking Survey
Profi tability (as % of total revenue)
Source: KPMG International, KPMG’s 2011 Caribbean Hotel Benchmarking Survey.
Despite the uptick in certain key performance indicators, 2010’s profi tability was down across the board when compared to 2009, largely because of:
■ a decrease in guest expenditure on discretionary/incidental items
■ increases in expenses related to other operated departments, utilities, management fees and fi xed costs
On average, reporting hotels posted positive income before fi xed charges but negative net operating income. Nevertheless both the average room and full-time employee counts held steady over the period.
(5)%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
2009 2010
Departmental income
Gross operating profit
Income before fixed charges
Net operating income/(loss)
KPMG’s 2011 Caribbean Hotel Benchmarking Survey │10
Most hotels in the Survey believe 2011 will be better than 2010 but that meaningful growth will not return until 2012 or 2013.
Will 2011’s performance be better than 2010’s?
When will growth return?
Source: KPMG International, KPMG’s 2011 Caribbean Hotel Benchmarking Survey.
Source: KPMG International, KPMG’s 2011 Caribbean Hotel Benchmarking Survey.
Outlook
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
2012 2013 2014 2015 or beyond
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
1 = not very optimistic
2 3 = moderately optimistic
4 5 = very optimistic
11│KPMG’s 2011 Caribbean Hotel Benchmarking Survey
In an effort to maintain rates and occupancies, nearly 45% of hotels are using revenue enhancement (e.g. up-selling, cross-selling, improving reservation systems, etc.) as their primary performance improvement tool for 2011, followed by cost cutting measures at just over 20%.
Slow economic recovery, particularly in the main source markets for visitors, is seen as the primary hindrance to a rebound in the Caribbean tourism industry. As such, nearly half of the hotels surveyed believe that a turnaround in the economy will be the main indicator of a return to growth.
Primary performance improvement tool for 2011
Challenges to growth
Source: KPMG International, KPMG’s 2011 Caribbean Hotel Benchmarking Survey.
Source: KPMG International, KPMG’s 2011 Caribbean Hotel Benchmarking Survey.
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%
Fragile global economic recovery
Increased hotel operating costs
Increased travel costs
Reduced airlift
Increased destination costs
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45%
Revenue enhancement
Cost cutting
Increased marketing
Rate obscuring
Room rate discounting
No measures to be taken
KPMG’s 2011 Caribbean Hotel Benchmarking Survey │12
Indicators of growth
Source: KPMG International, KPMG’s 2011 Caribbean Hotel Benchmarking Survey.
Source: KPMG International, KPMG’s 2011 Caribbean Hotel Benchmarking Survey.
Given the diffi cult operating climate over the last few years, an overwhelming majority of reporting hotels do not believe there is enough regional government leadership to make the changes they think are needed within the tourism industry. Specifi c concerns noted include the lack of investment in the industry by some jurisdictions and the general cost and availability of airlift.
Are regional governments showing suffi cient tourism leadership?
Yes4%
No 78%
Unsure18%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%
Stronger general economic recovery
Improved consumer confidence
Improved employment numbers
Increased financial market stability
Housing market recovery
13│KPMG’s 2011 Caribbean Hotel Benchmarking Survey
Below we compare the results of respondents’ confi dence in the industry against results from last year as refl ected in our 2010 Caribbean Hotel Benchmarking Survey:
Caribbean hotel confi dence barometer
Confi dence
Source: KPMG International, KPMG’s 2011 Caribbean Hotel Benchmarking Survey.
Source: KPMG International, KPMG’s 2011 Caribbean Hotel Benchmarking Survey.
Despite the drop in confi dence, more than 40% of hotels indicated that they intend to expand within the next 18 months, using a variety of funding sources:
How will expansion plans be funded?
What hotels are saying:
“Growth is visible again”
“Must focus on improving our competitive advantage – people and culture”
“Signs are positive but seen false dawns before”
“The sky is not the limit, only we can limit our skies!”
“Our destination’s brand has lost its lustre”
“Until governments fully appreciate the importance of the sector, not just in direct employment and construction, but the ancillary services such as accounting and insurance, their policies will never address the core problems in the sector”
3.52
2.77
0
1
2
3
4
5
Oct 10 May 11
Con
fiden
ce le
vel (
1 be
aris
h –
5 bu
llish
)
New equity17%
New or refinanced
debt33%
Operational cash flow
33%
Debt/equity hybrid17%
KPMG’s 2011 Caribbean Hotel Benchmarking Survey │14
KPMG’s Caribbean Travel, Leisure and Tourism Contacts
Please contact the KPMG fi rm represented in your country if you have any questions. KPMG fi rms are represented in more than 20 countries in the Caribbean region, and have a specifi c knowledge and understanding of the business, cultural, economic and political facets of conducting businessin each country.
Anguilla, St Kitts and NevisClaudel Romney1 264 497 [email protected]
Antigua, DominicaCleveland Seaforth1 268 462 [email protected]
BahamasCharlene Lewis-Small1 242 393 [email protected]
BarbadosLisa Taylor1 246 434 [email protected]
BermudaStephen Woodward1 441 294 [email protected]
British Virgin Islands Russell Crumpler1 284 494 1134 [email protected]
Cayman Islands Kris Beighton1 345 914 [email protected]
Dominican RepublicDoris M. Brea1 809 412 [email protected]
Dutch Caribbean, Cuba and Suriname Henk de Zeeuw599 9 [email protected]
JamaicaPatricia Dailey-Smith 1 876 922 6640 [email protected]
Puerto Rico, US Virgin IslandsMiguel Venta1 787 622 [email protected]
St LuciaFrank Myers1 758 453 [email protected]
St Vincent and the Grenadines, GrenadaBrian Glasgow 1 784 456 [email protected]
Trinidad and TobagoRaoul John1 868 623 [email protected]
Turks and CaicosGary Brough1 649 946 [email protected]
The information contained herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation.
© 2011 KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. Member fi rms of the KPMG network of independent fi rms are affi liated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member fi rm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member fi rm vis-à-vis third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member fi rm. All rights reserved.
The KPMG name, logo and “cutting through complexity” are registered trademarks or trademarks of KPMG International.