CARDS EVALUATION REPORT, SOUTH LG4 HIGH EASTMAIN...
Transcript of CARDS EVALUATION REPORT, SOUTH LG4 HIGH EASTMAIN...
CARDS Evaluation Report, South LG4-High Eastmain (Baie James) Kimberlite Project, Quebec
DIAGNOS Inc. 1 May 2016 (December 2016 Update)
CARDS EVALUATION REPORT,
SOUTH LG4 – HIGH EASTMAIN (Baie
James) KIMBERLITE PROJECT,
QUEBEC
Prepared by: DIAGNOS Inc. 7005 Taschereau Blvd, Suite 340 Brossard, Québec Canada, J4Z 1A7
May 18th, 2016 (December 2016 Update)
CARDS Evaluation Report, South LG4-High Eastmain (Baie James) Kimberlite Project, Quebec
DIAGNOS Inc. 2 May 2016 (December 2016 Update)
1.0 SUMMARY In 2016 DIAGNOS used its proprietary Computer Aided Resource Detection System
(CARDS) to target the kimberlite potential of the South LG4-High Eastmain (Baie James)
area, lies to eastern portion of the Superior Province. This territory became a focal point for
diamondiferous kimberlites exploration following the discovery of diamonds in the Renard
and the Beaver Lake sectors. The Renard kimberlites are recognized for their large stones,
like famous transparent diamond weighing more 4 carats.
The purpose of this study was to identify favorable exploration kimberlite targets based on
the analysis of all available geophysical and surface data using artificial intelligence and data
mining techniques.
During the months of January 2016 through to March 2016, over 23,912 km2 were subject
to evaluation by DIAGNOS in the Northern Quebec region between the 50th and the 55th
parallels using a mosaic of two leveled and merged airborne magnetic-spectrometric
surveys of the South LG4 and the High Eastmain areas, Baie James (Sigeom, MRN,
Quebec).
Twelve (12) known kimberlite pipes of the Renard and the Beaver Lake originated from the
Sigeom database (MRN, Quebec) and from the Stornoway Diamond Corporation (NI 43-101-
Report, 2013) where used as positive training data. Two (2) different models, such as the
Kimberlite Similarity algorithm (KSM) and the Positive-Negative algorithm, at a 60m
resolution were generated over the South LG4-High Eastmain modeling area.
DIAGNOS generated two categories of 16 and 106 Kimberlite Pipe Targets (KPT_BJ_2016)
based on two levels of similarity at 95% and 90%.
In May 2016 DIAGNOS staked 131 non-contiguous claim blocks covering two groups of 9
and 28 Kimberlite Pipe Targets based on two levels of similarity at 95% and 90%, beside
the new diamond Renard mine and the new 167 extension road.
A first phase of exploration work program is suggested to be conducted over these 131
property claims regarding 37 CARDS kimberlite targets, for a total amount $154,551.95.
CARDS Evaluation Report, South LG4-High Eastmain (Baie James) Kimberlite Project, Quebec
DIAGNOS Inc. 3 May 2016 (December 2016 Update)
Table of Contents
1.0 SUMMARY ........................................................................................................... 2
2.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................ 5
3.0 RELIANCE ON OTHER EXPERTS ........................................................................... 6
4.0 PROJECT LOCATION .......................................................................................... 7
5.0 GEOLOGICAL SETTING ...................................................................................... 8
5.1 Regional Geology ........................................................................................... 8
5.2 Local Geology .............................................................................................. 10
5.3 Mineralization .............................................................................................. 10
6.0 CARDS MODELLING AND PREDICTION SYSTEM................................................... 13
6.1 Modeling ..................................................................................................... 14
6.1.1 Kimberlite Similarity Model (KSM) ............................................................ 14
6.1.2 Positive-Negative Model .......................................................................... 14
6.2 Methodology................................................................................................ 15
7.0 VARIABLES .................................................................................................... 16
8.0 TRAINING DATA.............................................................................................. 22
9.0 MODELS ........................................................................................................ 35
9.1 Kimberlite Similarity Model (KSM) .................................................................. 35
9.2 Positive-Negative Model ................................................................................ 37
10.0 RESULTS..................................................................................................... 37
11.0 CONCLUSION & RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................. 45
12.0 REFERENCES ............................................................................................... 48
13.0 DELIVERABLES ............................................................................................ 48
14.0 CERTIFICATE OF QUALIFICATION .................................................................. 49
CARDS Evaluation Report, South LG4-High Eastmain (Baie James) Kimberlite Project, Quebec
DIAGNOS Inc. 4 May 2016 (December 2016 Update)
List of Figures
Figure 1 : South LG4-High Eastmain (Baie James) kimberlite project location (Quebec
geological map provinces after Theriault & Beausejour, DV 2012-06, MRN) ....................... 7
Figure 2 : Bedrock geology of the South LG4-High Eastmain (Baie James) kimberlite project
area (after Theriault & Beausejour, DV 2012-06, MRN) ................................................ 11
Figure 3: Residual Magnetic Intensity (D’Amours, 2010: DP 2010-03 & DP 2011-01) ........ 18
Figure 4: Spectrometry-Potassium (D’Amours, 2010: DP 2010-03 & DP 2011-01) ............ 19
Figure 5: Topography (SRTM) .................................................................................... 20
Figure 6: Training points ........................................................................................... 34
Figure 7: Diagnos Staked CARDS Kimberlite Targets..................................................... 44
List of Tables
Table 1: NTS SRNC 50k Maps sheet number over the South LG4-High Eastmain (Baie
James) kimberlite project ............................................................................................ 8
Table 2: Primary and derivative variable data set for Positive-Negative Modeling ............. 21
Table 3: Primary and derivative variable data set for Kimberlite Similarity Modeling (KSM) 21
Table 4: Calculated neighboring variables .................................................................... 21
Table 5: List of known kimberlite pipes ....................................................................... 23
Table 6: List of confirmed negative anomalies .............................................................. 26
Table 7: Similarity coefficients, window size of 300 meters for kimberlite pipes ................ 36
Table 8: Similarity coefficients, window size of 500 meters for kimberlite pipes ................ 36
Table 9: Performance of Positive-Negative models for kimberlite pipes............................ 37
Table 10: Staked CARDS Kimberlite Pipe Targets – Similarity 95% ................................. 38
Table 11: CARDS Kimberlite Pipe Targets – Similarity 90%............................................ 39
Table 12: Claim List .................................................................................................. 40
CARDS Evaluation Report, South LG4-High Eastmain (Baie James) Kimberlite Project, Quebec
DIAGNOS Inc. 5 May 2016 (December 2016 Update)
2.0 INTRODUCTION In January 2016, DIAGNOS Inc. (DIAGNOS) used its proprietary Computer Aided Resource
Detection System (CARDS) to target the kimberlite potential of the South LG4-High
Eastmain (Baie James) area. Twelve (12) known kimberlites pipes (the Renard and the
Beaver lake clusters) in the study area are related to the Otish kimberlitic volcanic event
(550.0 + 3.5 Ma to 640.5 + 28 Ma) in Quebec (Moorhead et al., 2003).
CARDS uses data mining techniques to analyze digitally compiled exploration data and
identify areas, target zones, with high statistical probability of similarity to known areas of
mineralization.
Using CARDS, DIAGNOS generated target zones on the South LG4-High Eastmain (Baie
James) kimberlite project area with high similarities to known “signatures” of areas of
known kimberlite pipes.
The region is well suited for analysis by CARDS due to the large amount of information
available. The elements of the database used to construct the models were originated from
the Sigeom database (MRN, Quebec) and from the Stornoway Diamond Corporation (NI 43-
101-Report, 2013).
In May 2016 DIAGNOS staked 131 non-contiguous claim blocks covering two groups of 9
and 28 Kimberlite Pipe Targets based on two levels of similarity at 95% and 90%, beside
the new diamond Renard mine and the new 167 extension road. These targets are
presented in tables and attached map and discussed at the end of this report.
The purpose of this report is to present the modeling results, to describe the methodology,
the modeling process, the utilized data and the exploration program proposed for 37 staked
kimberlite targets.
CARDS Evaluation Report, South LG4-High Eastmain (Baie James) Kimberlite Project, Quebec
DIAGNOS Inc. 6 May 2016 (December 2016 Update)
3.0 RELIANCE ON OTHER EXPERTS In the course of this study, DIAGNOS used data originated from the Sigeom database (MRN,
Quebec) and from the Stornoway Diamond Corporation (NI 43-101-Report, 2013). The
author has not taken any action to verify or assess reported data. If not commented, the
author considers the documentary sources as reliable, technically valid and usable with
some restriction related to the present frame of work and the experience of the authors.
Kimberlite targets on the South LG4-High Eastmain (Baie James) project were generated
using DIAGNOS proprietary Computer Aided Resource Detection System (CARDS).
Generation of these targets using “data mining techniques” was carried out by the “CARDS
team” at DIAGNOS consisting of Riadh Kobbi, Data Modeling Manager, co-author of sections
6.0 to 10.0 of this report, with the collaboration and under the supervision of Houssem Ben
Tahar, B.Eng. Statistics, M.Sc., Vice-President, Development and Business Intelligence at
DIAGNOS. The author has relied on the opinion and work of the “CARDS team” at DIAGNOS
responsible for target zone generation using CARDS.
CARDS Evaluation Report, South LG4-High Eastmain (Baie James) Kimberlite Project, Quebec
DIAGNOS Inc. 7 May 2016 (December 2016 Update)
4.0 PROJECT LOCATION The area of the South LG4-High Eastmain (Baie James) kimberlite project covers a total
aggregated surface area of 23,912 km2 located in the Northern Quebec between the 50th
and the 55th parallels (Figure 1).
Figure 1 : South LG4-High Eastmain (Baie James) kimberlite project location (Quebec
geological map provinces after Theriault & Beausejour, DV 2012-06, MRN)
CARDS Evaluation Report, South LG4-High Eastmain (Baie James) Kimberlite Project, Quebec
DIAGNOS Inc. 8 May 2016 (December 2016 Update)
It covers 25 NTS SRNC 50k Map sheets (Table 1 & Figure 2).
Table 1: NTS SRNC 50k Maps sheet number over the South LG4-High Eastmain
(Baie James) kimberlite project 032B15 032B16 033A13 033A14 033A15 033A16 033B10 033B09 033A12 033A11 033A10 033A09 033B07 033B08 033A05 033A06 033A07 033A08 033B02 033B01 033A04 033A03 033A02 033A01 032P16 5.0 GEOLOGICAL SETTING Portions of the regional geology, local geology and mineralization sections have been taken
in its integral form from: “The Renard Diamond Project, Québec, Canada Feasibility Study
Update, Stornoway Diamond Corporation - NI 43-101 Technical Report – February 28,
2013, 320p.”
5.1 Regional Geology The area covered by the the South LG4-Eastmain (Baie James) kimberlite project “is located
within the eastern portion of the Superior Craton (Superior Structural Province), (Figure 1).
The Superior Province forms the Archaean core of the Canadian Shield, and is the largest
contiguous region of Archaean crust remaining on the globe. It is considered to be an
amalgamation of small continental fragments of Meso-Archaean age and Neo-Archaean
oceanic plates, with a complex history of aggregation between 2.72 Ga and 2.68 Ga. Since
about 2.6 Ga, the Province has been tectonically stable (Percival, 2006)”.
“The Superior Province is surrounded by provinces of Paleo-Proterozoic age on the west,
north and east (Churchill Province), and Meso-Proterozoic age (Grenville Province) on the
southeast. Margins of the Superior Province were affected during Paleo-Proterozoic and
Meso-Proterozoic tectonism. Proterozoic and younger activity is limited to rifting of the
margins (Mid Continent Rift System), emplacement of numerous mafic dyke swarms,
compressional reactivation and large-scale rotation at ca. 1.9 Ga, and failed rifting at ca.
1.1 Ga (Percival, 2006)”.
CARDS Evaluation Report, South LG4-High Eastmain (Baie James) Kimberlite Project, Quebec
DIAGNOS Inc. 9 May 2016 (December 2016 Update)
“Quaternary glacial cover in the area was controlled by the New Québec Ice Divide. From
the divide, ice flowed north and northeast toward Ungava Bay and west to southwest
toward Hudson Bay. Glacial lineaments are well developed and widespread. Eskers and
hummocky to discontinuous, unmoulded, ground moraine deposits are also common”.
“There are five known episodes of kimberlitic volcanism in Québec (Moorhead et al., 2003);
from south to north, the kimberlite fields are:
x Témiscamingue: six diatreme facies pipes intruding the Pontiac Subprovince. Two
age dates, 125 Ma (Rb-Sr) and 142 Ma (U-Pb) have been obtained. Kimberlites are
hosted in the northwest-trending Témiscaming structural zone.
x Desmaraisville: five hypabyssal pipes and numerous dykes located in the central
portion of the Abitibi Subprovince. Age date of 1104 Ma (Rb-Sr fromphlogopite).
Hosted in the Waswanipi–Saguenay Tectonic Zone; pipes are in close proximity to
northeast-trending Proterozoic dykes.
x Otish: at least 12 pipes intruding the northeast portion of Opatica and Opinaca
Subprovinces. Age dates range from 550.0 + 3.5 Ma at Beaver Lake to 640.5 + 28
Ma at Renard. The kimberlite field is associated with the southern end of the
Mistassini-Lemoyne structural zone, and near-northwest, and northeast-trending
Proterozoic diabase dykes.
x Wemindji: kimberlitic sills intruding Archaean-age gneisses of La Grande
Subprovince, located at the western end of the Wemindji–Caniapiscau structural
zone where it intersects the northeasterly projection of the Kapuskasing zone.
x Torngat: diamond-bearing dykes recognized in the Paleo-Proterozoic Rae Province
near the Archaean Nain Craton. These dykes were classified as carbonatized
ultramafic lamprophyres and dated at 550 Ma”.
“The Renard Cluster is considered to be part of the Otish kimberlitic volcanic event”.
CARDS Evaluation Report, South LG4-High Eastmain (Baie James) Kimberlite Project, Quebec
DIAGNOS Inc. 10 May 2016 (December 2016 Update)
5.2 Local Geology
The South LG4-High Eastmain (Baie James) kimberlite project area is situated between the
La Grande greenstone (volcanic) belt to the north and the Otish Mountains to the south
(Figure 2). The Otish Mountain and Mistassini groups of Proterozoic, clastic,
metasedimentary rocks overlie the Archean lithologies, marginal to the Grenville Province.
“Granite–gneiss and retrograde granulite gneisses of sedimentary origin are the
predominant lithologies in the project area; however, lesser granite and granodiorite may
also be present. The gneisses may contain relict metasedimentary and metavolcanic rock
assemblages, as well as associated mafic and ultramafic intrusive rocks. Minor linear belts
of supracrustal metavolcanic rocks occur throughout the area, generally trending east-west
or west-northwest. Northwest-trending, Proterozoic Mistassini Swarm diabase and gabbro
dykes up to 30 m wide cross-cut all lithologies. Isolated outliers of Proterozoic clastic
metasedimentary rocks are present in the area (O’Connor and Lépine, 2006)”.
“Metamorphic grade within the Foxtrot area is primarily amphibolite facies with local
granulite facies being reported near Lac Minto (Percival et al., 1994). Higher-grade
lithologies in the north are interpreted as supracrustal relicts dating to 3.1 Ga. Granite and
granite gneiss are dated at 2.7 Ga and local felsic and intermediate intrusive rocks are
dated at 2.5 Ga”.
“Glacial overburden within the project is can be up to 30 m thick, but is on average 12 m
thick in the area of the Renard Cluster. Glacial deposits consist of till, eskers, moraine and
post-glacial sediments, and their orientation reflects ice transport from the north-
northeast”.
5.3 Mineralization
“The Renard kimberlite pipes and Lynx and Hibou dykes were emplaced into granitic and
gneissic host rocks, and contain diamonds of potential economic interest. The bodies
comprise a late Neo-Proterozoic to Cambrian kimberlite field in Québec (Girard, 2001;
Moorhead et al., 2002; Letendre et al., 2003)”.
CARD
S E
valu
atio
n Rep
ort,
Sou
th L
G4-H
igh
East
mai
n (B
aie
Jam
es)
Kim
berlite
Proj
ect,
Que
bec
DIA
GN
OS I
nc.
11
M
ay 2
016
(Dec
embe
r 20
16 U
pdat
e)
Fi
gure
2 :
Bed
rock
geo
logy
of
the
Sou
th L
G4-
Hig
h Ea
stm
ain
(Bai
e Ja
mes
) ki
mbe
rlite
proj
ect
area
(aft
er T
heri
ault &
Bea
usej
our,
DV 2
012-
06,
MR
N)
CARDS Evaluation Report, South LG4-High Eastmain (Baie James) Kimberlite Project, Quebec
DIAGNOS Inc. 12 May 2016 (December 2016 Update)
“The kimberlite pipes are typically spaced between 50 m and 500 m from each other.
Geophysical data and drill information from delineation and bulk sampling programs indicate
that, in general, most of the Renard kimberlites are irregular and elliptical in planar view.
Surface areas of the kimberlite portion of the pipes range from 0.1 ha to 2.01 ha.”
“The Renard kimberlite pipes comprise root zone to diatreme facies rocks characterized by a
complex internal geology. These pipes can be classified as “typical” South-African-style
kimberlites (Hawthorne, 1973, Clement and Skinner, 1979, Clement, 1982 and Field and
Scott Smith, 1999). In most pipes, with the exception of Renard 3 and Renard 10, the
dominant phase is a MVK that can be classified as TKB. In general, these TKBs are
extensively altered and have a massive texture. They consist of varying amounts of olivine,
juvenile clasts and country rock xenoliths that are poorly sorted, typically loosely packed
and less commonly clast supported, all set within a highly altered interclast matrix. In many
pipes a secondary pipe-filling phase is present that is typically a more coherent or
transitional kimberlite characterized by lower country rock xenolith content and higher
olivine content set within a dominantly crystalline groundmass. In all bodies, HK is present
as both dykes and irregularly shape intrusions that are found within each pipe infilling
phase, between contacts of phases and along pipe margins. These are typically considered
later stage intrusions”.
“The Renard bodies are all associated with extensive cracked country rock (CCR) and with
the exception of Renard 3, Renard 7 and Renard 8, have a significant marginal country rock
breccia (CRB). The marginal CCR consists of both broken and solid country rock with minor
amounts of HK dykes and veins throughout. Minor zones of extensively fractured to
brecciated country rock are also present in this unit. The CRB typically lies between the
main kimberlite units and the CCR and is characterized by dominantly broken and
pulverized country rock, with an overall dilution of 95% or greater. CRB contains from 0% -
5% kimberlite, present as olivine in the pulverized country rock matrix. Locally, the CRB
may also contain more than 10% diamond-bearing kimberlitic material, in the form of late-
stage, cross-cutting HK dykes”.
“Each Renard kimberlite contains a variety of phases that are distinguishable from one
another by differing macroscopic and microscopic properties as well as diamond grades.
Whole rock trace element compositions suggest that the Renards have a close affinity to
Group I kimberlite (after Skinner, 1989), with some melnoitic overlap, likely due to
CARDS Evaluation Report, South LG4-High Eastmain (Baie James) Kimberlite Project, Quebec
DIAGNOS Inc. 13 May 2016 (December 2016 Update)
contamination by country rock (Birkett et al., 2004). However, petrographic analyses of
these rocks support Group I kimberlite classification”.
6.0 CARDS MODELLING AND PREDICTION SYSTEM CARDS is a state of the art computer system that uses the latest artificial intelligence and
pattern recognition algorithms to analyze large digital exploration data sets and produce
exploration targets. CARDS Uses many layers of gridded data (variables) to learn the
“signature” of known mineralized sites (positive cells) in a given area. The area is then
scored and cells with a high similarity to the sought “signature” are identified.
The primary layers of gridded data can be:
¾ Geophysical surveys: MAG, EM, IP, gravity, radiometry
¾ Geochemical surveys: soil, stream sediment, lake bottom, till
¾ Digital elevation models
¾ Satellite imagery
¾ Geological maps: rock type, alteration
¾ Proximity to interpreted lineaments, mapped faults and shear zones
¾ Proximity to lithological contacts or specific intrusive suites
¾ Proximity to a geochemical anomaly
But these data layers may contain only part of the information because single point readings
taken alone have little meaning. The neighborhood around each individual cell also contains
important information and patterns. For example, there is no good reason for mineralization
to occur at a single elevation; but when all the cells of the topography grid are combined,
patterns such as: linear ridges, drainage patterns, circular patterns, etc. can appear and in
some cases be an indicator of structure or lithology. The same logic applies to geophysical
grids; it might be that certain slopes near a high values have statistical significance. Such
patterns can be represented by 1) calculating the derivatives of the primary grids and
2) calculating “neighborhood” variables, which allow the characteristics of all cells within a
specified distance (neighborhood) to be weighed into the evaluation of each individual cell.
CARDS Evaluation Report, South LG4-High Eastmain (Baie James) Kimberlite Project, Quebec
DIAGNOS Inc. 14 May 2016 (December 2016 Update)
These many extra calculated layers are imputed in CARDS along with the primary layers
creating an important training database. Each cell in this database is identified as positive or
unknown, based on drill hole and rock sample assays, and linked to its own set of
characteristics (primary, derivative and neighboring variables). Several algorithms are then
used to identify the unknown cells that have a set of characteristics most similar to the
signature of the positive cells.
The quality and usefulness of results derived from CARDS modeling is dependent on a
variety of factors including the coverage, quantity, variety and quality of geoscientific and
historical exploration data processed. In addition, where interpreted data is used, it is also
dependent on the adequacy of the interpretation.
Targets generated by CARDS should be evaluated in conjunction with all readily available
geological data in the evaluation of the economic potential of a property as well as in the
outlining of exploration targets.
6.1 Modeling In order to study the accuracy of predictions and to validate modeling results, two methods
are used and compared on the modeling area.
6.1.1 Kimberlite Similarity Model (KSM) The KSM consists of computing, over a moving window, a first-order regression between a
vertical cylinder model anomaly and the gridded magnetic data (Mag) over the project area.
The same procedure is applied with derivative in z magnetic data and the analytical signal
data (Asig). Only the results where the absolute value of the similarity coefficient is above a
certain threshold and satisfy certain conditions were retained.
6.1.2 Positive-Negative Model The Positive-Negative Model is based on decision trees using all existing variables (primary
variables, derivative variables and neighboring variables) in the database. This model allows
CARDS Evaluation Report, South LG4-High Eastmain (Baie James) Kimberlite Project, Quebec
DIAGNOS Inc. 15 May 2016 (December 2016 Update)
finding which variables discriminate the best positive sites versus negative sites. These
variables were then used to make predictions for all other unknown sites.
6.2 Methodology The modeling process can be summarized as follows:
1- Prepare the database
¾ Compile all available gridded data layers covering the modeling area (magnetic,
radiometric, topographic, etc.).
¾ Calculate derivatives (dx, dy, dz, 2dz, analytical signal (Asig), tilt, etc.) of selected
primary layers (magnetic and topographic) and create 8 derivative grids for each of
these layers.
¾ Use a moving window to capture the neighboring patterns around each point and
create the 22 neighborhood grids for each primary layer and each derivative layer.
¾ Identify the positive points (known kimberlites) and the negative points (confirmed
negative anomalies), and associate them to their closest cell.
2- Run the KSM algorithm
¾ Run the KSM with all positive points (known kimberlites) and three magnetic
variables (Mag, dz of Mag and Asig of Mag) using the first window (300m x 300m).
¾ Run the KSM with all positive points (known kimberlites) and three magnetic
variables (Mag, dz of Mag and Asig of Mag) using the second window (500m x
500m).
¾ Generate 72 similarity coefficients for each cell in order to measure the similarity
degree between the positive Kimberlite Pipes and unknown cells.
¾ Aggregate the KSM results and assign to each cell the frequency of similarity
coefficient above 0.9.
3- Run the Positive-Negative algorithm
¾ Get all existent information about the positive and negative sites.
CARDS Evaluation Report, South LG4-High Eastmain (Baie James) Kimberlite Project, Quebec
DIAGNOS Inc. 16 May 2016 (December 2016 Update)
¾ Split randomly the learning data set in different sub-sets to avoid over-fitting in
learning process and to assure optimal model which can be generalized and
applicable to different regions.
¾ Generate a signature that discriminates between positive points and negative points
using the hole of existent information.
¾ Train different decision trees on the training group to get the most likely signature of
positive and negative points (the result from one unique tree is not robust).
¾ Aggregate the different rules of the trees by getting a similarity between 0
(negative) and 1 (positive) computed as the average of the different classifications
by giving the same importance to each tree.
¾ Run the new rules on the unseen group of sites (test group) to evaluate the accuracy
of the tool.
¾ Classify the points in the study area (other sites with no assay results) by scoring
following rules: if the average similarity computed from the trees is over considered
threshold so the site will be considered as positive.
4- Generate exploration targets based on the best similarity values.
7.0 VARIABLES A total of 552 variables for models using the Positive-Negative algorithm and 3 variables for
model using the Kimberlite Similarity algorithm which derived from data originated from the
Sigeom database (MRN, Quebec), were used as inputs in the prediction modeling process.
These layers of data are classified in three categories:
1. Primary data: leveled and merged airborne magnetic-spectrometric survey
(Figures 3 & 4) and topography (SRTM), (Figure 5).
2. Derivative data: dx, dy, dz, analytical signal, tilt, etc. for magnetic and
topography (SRTM) layers (Tables 2 and 3).
3. Neighboring data: sum, median, standard deviation, etc. (Table 4).
The geophysical data set used for this model originated from the Sigeom database (MRN,
Quebec). They consist of a mosaic of two leveled and merged airborne magnetic-
CARDS Evaluation Report, South LG4-High Eastmain (Baie James) Kimberlite Project, Quebec
DIAGNOS Inc. 17 May 2016 (December 2016 Update)
spectrometric surveys (cell size 60m) of the South LG4 and the High Eastmain areas
(D’Amours, 2010: DP 2010-03 & DP 2011-01), (Figures 3 & 4).
Neighboring variables (Table 4) have been calculated for all of the measured and calculated
variables for the regional data set; this way, the characteristics of all points within a
specified distance are weighed into the evaluation of that point. A moving windows of 300m
is used around each individual cell in order to select neighboring cells for this calculation.
In all, a total of 552 variables (24 x 23) for Positive-Negative modeling and 3 variables for
Kimberlite Similarity modeling were used for the study area. The primary and derivative
variables can be found as grid files and databases in the data CD accompanied with this
report. All of the above data originated from the Sigeom database (MRN, Quebec). Only the
SRTM (Shuttle Radar Topographic Mission) topography (Figure 5) was used by DIAGNOS to
characterize the topography input. Data was gridded to a 60m cell size (model resolution)
which corresponds to 6,642,222 data points.
CARD
S E
valu
atio
n Rep
ort,
Sou
th L
G4-H
igh
East
mai
n (B
aie
Jam
es)
Kim
berlite
Proj
ect,
Que
bec
DIA
GN
OS I
nc.
18
M
ay 2
016
(Dec
embe
r 20
16 U
pdat
e)
Figu
re 3
: R
esid
ual M
agne
tic
Inte
nsity
(D’A
mou
rs,
2010
: D
P 20
10-0
3 &
DP
2011
-01)
CARD
S E
valu
atio
n Rep
ort,
Sou
th L
G4-H
igh
East
mai
n (B
aie
Jam
es)
Kim
berlite
Proj
ect,
Que
bec
DIA
GN
OS I
nc.
19
M
ay 2
016
(Dec
embe
r 20
16 U
pdat
e)
Fi
gure
4:
Spe
ctro
met
ry-P
otas
sium
(D
’Am
ours
, 20
10:
DP
2010
-03
& D
P 20
11-0
1)
CARD
S E
valu
atio
n Rep
ort,
Sou
th L
G4-H
igh
East
mai
n (B
aie
Jam
es)
Kim
berlite
Proj
ect,
Que
bec
DIA
GN
OS I
nc.
20
M
ay 2
016
(Dec
embe
r 20
16 U
pdat
e)
Fi
gure
5:
Topo
grap
hy (
SRTM
)
CARDS Evaluation Report, South LG4-High Eastmain (Baie James) Kimberlite Project, Quebec
DIAGNOS Inc. 21 May 2016 (December 2016 Update)
Table 2: Primary and derivative variable data set for Positive-Negative Modeling
Variables Description
1 RMI Residual Magnetic Intensity
2 RMI_dx Calculated derivative of RMI in x
3 RMI_dy Calculated derivative of RMI in y
4 RMI_dz Calculated vertical derivative (dz) of RMI
5 RMI_2dz Calculated second vertical derivative (dz) of RMI
6 RMI_ASIG Calculated analytical signal of RMI
7 RMI_TDR Calculated tilt derivative of RMI
8 RMI_HD_TDR Calculated horizontal derivative of RMI _TDR
9 Kper Potassium
10 TCngyh Total Count
11 Thppm Thorium
12 Uppm Uranium
13 K_TC_Ratio Potassium / Total Count
14 U_Th_Ratio Uranium / Thorium
15 Th_K_Ratio Thorium / Potassium
16 U_K_Ratio Uranium / Potassium 17 SRTM Topography
18 SRTM_dx Calculated derivative of SRTM in x
19 SRTM_dy Calculated derivative of SRTM in y
20 SRTM_dz Calculated vertical derivative (dz) of SRTM
21 SRTM_ASIG Calculated second vertical derivative (dz) of SRTM
22 SRTM_2dz Calculated analytical signal of SRTM
23 SRTM_TDR Calculated tilt derivative of SRTM
24 SRTM_HD_TDR Calculated horizontal derivative of SRTM _TDR
Table 3: Primary and derivative variable data set for Kimberlite Similarity Modeling (KSM)
Variables Description
1 RMI Residual Magnetic Intensity
2 RMI_ASIG Calculated analytical signal of RMI
3 RMI_dz Calculated vertical derivative (dz) of RMI
Table 4: Calculated neighboring variables
Variable Description
1 _hood_sum Sum in the neighborhood
2 _hood_abssum Sum of absolute values in the neighborhood
CARDS Evaluation Report, South LG4-High Eastmain (Baie James) Kimberlite Project, Quebec
DIAGNOS Inc. 22 May 2016 (December 2016 Update)
Variable Description
3 _hood_min Minimum in the neighborhood
4 _hood_max Maximum in the neighborhood
5 _hood_avg Average in the neighborhood
6 _hood_stddev Standard deviation in the neighborhood
7 _hood_reldev Relative deviation in the neighborhood
8 _hood_kurtosis Kurtosis (measure of the "peakedness") in the neighborhood
9 _MedianGradient Median gradient in the neighborhood
10 _DistGravCenter Distance from gravity center in the neighborhood
11 _hood_hslope Horizontal slope in the neighborhood
12 _hood_hslope_min Minimum of horizontal slopes in the neighborhood
13 _hood_hslope_max Maximum of horizontal slopes in the neighborhood
14 _hood_hslope_sum Sum of horizontal slope in the neighborhood
15 _hood_hslope_avg Average of horizontal slopes in the neighborhood
16 _hood_hslope_stddev Standard deviation of horizontal slopes in the neighborhood
17 _hood_vslope Vertical slope in the neighborhood
18 _hood_vslope_min Minimum of vertical slopes in the neighborhood
19 _hood_vslope_max Maximum of vertical slopes in the neighborhood
20 _hood_vslope_sum Sum of vertical slopes in the neighborhood
21 _hood_vslope_avg Average of vertical slopes in the neighborhood
22 _hood_vslope_stddev Standard deviation of vertical slopes in the neighborhood
8.0 TRAINING DATA The training data set was built using :
x Twelve (12) known kimberlite pipes of the Renard and the Beaver Lake (Table 5)
originated from the Sigeom database (MRN, Quebec) and from from the Stornoway
Diamond Corporation (NI 43-101-Report, 2013).
x One hundred and eleven (111) confirmed negative anomalies (DDH collars location)
regarding kimberlites (Table 6) originated from the Sigeom database (MRN, Quebec).
The spatial distribution of the training points used in model area is illustrated in Figure 6.
The Kimberlite Similarity model (KSM) was generated using 12 (twelve) known kimberlite
pipes, while the Positive-Negative model was generated using 12 (twelve) known kimberlite
pipes and 111 (one hundred and eleven) confirmed negative anomalies regarding
kimberlites.
CARD
S E
valu
atio
n Rep
ort,
Sou
th L
G4-H
igh
East
mai
n (B
aie
Jam
es)
Kim
berlite
Proj
ect,
Que
bec
DIA
GN
OS I
nc.
23
M
ay 2
016
(Dec
embe
r 20
16 U
pdat
e)
Tabl
e 5:
Lis
t of
kno
wn
kim
berlite
pipe
s N
r K
imb
erl
ite P
ipe
Occ
urr
ence
X
_N
AD
83
_U
TM
_Z
18
Y
_N
AD
83
_U
TM
_Z
18
D
imen
sion
s at
Su
rface
(m
)
Dep
th C
ove
r (m
) Y
ear
of
Dis
cove
ry
No
tes
Fro
m R
efer
ence
s
1 Ren
ard
1 68
8906
58
5637
8 21
0 x
70
6.0
2001
“Dia
trem
e-zo
ne k
imbe
rlite
with
over
all r
egul
ar s
hape
. Slig
htly
elo
ngat
e no
rth-
sout
h, s
ub-c
ircu
lar
shap
e at
sur
face
” (S
torn
oway
D
iam
ond
Cor
pora
tion
- N
I 43
-101
Rep
ort-
2013
).
2 Ren
ard
2 68
9266
58
5526
5 15
3 x
70
22.0
20
01
“Dia
trem
e-zo
ne k
imbe
rlite
with
irre
gula
r sh
ape
near
su
rfac
e. S
light
ly e
long
ate
nort
h-so
uth
at s
urfa
ce.
Siz
e of
kim
berlite
port
ion
of p
ipe
incr
ease
with
dept
h. P
artly
cove
red
by
lake
” (S
torn
oway
Dia
mon
d Cor
pora
tion
- N
I 43
-101
Rep
ort-
2013
).
3 Ren
ard
3 68
9451
58
5519
7 12
0 x
24
12.0
20
02
“Roo
t-zo
ne k
imbe
rlite
with
over
all i
rreg
ular
sha
pe”
(Sto
rnow
ay D
iam
ond
Cor
pora
tion
- N
I 43
-101
Rep
ort-
2013
).
4 Ren
ard
4 68
8818
58
5558
1 17
8 x
110
11.0
20
02
“Par
tly
cove
red
by s
hallo
w
lake
(ab
out
0.4
ha).
D
iatr
eme-
zone
kim
berlite
with
over
all r
egul
ar s
hape
. Slig
htly
elo
ngat
e, e
ast-
wes
t tr
endi
ng s
ub-c
ircu
lar
shap
e at
sur
face
” (S
torn
oway
Dia
mon
d Cor
pora
tion
- N
I 43
-101
Rep
ort-
2013
).
5 Ren
ard
65
6890
01
5855
857
330
x 90
8.
0 20
02
“Dia
trem
e zo
ne k
imbe
rlite.
Slig
htly
elo
ngat
e no
rth-
sout
h tr
endi
ng ir
regu
lar
shap
e at
sur
face
” (S
torn
oway
Dia
mon
d
CARD
S E
valu
atio
n Rep
ort,
Sou
th L
G4-H
igh
East
mai
n (B
aie
Jam
es)
Kim
berlite
Proj
ect,
Que
bec
DIA
GN
OS I
nc.
24
M
ay 2
016
(Dec
embe
r 20
16 U
pdat
e)
Nr
Kim
berl
ite P
ipe
Occ
urr
ence
X
_N
AD
83
_U
TM
_Z
18
Y
_N
AD
83
_U
TM
_Z
18
D
imen
sion
s at
Su
rface
(m
)
Dep
th C
ove
r (m
) Y
ear
of
Dis
cove
ry
No
tes
Fro
m R
efer
ence
s
Cor
pora
tion
- N
I 43
-101
Rep
ort-
2013
).
6 Ren
ard
7 68
8854
58
5666
4 28
5 x
124
5.0
2002
“Dia
trem
e-zo
ne k
imbe
rlite
with
over
all r
egul
ar s
hape
an
d su
b-ci
rcul
ar s
hape
at
surf
ace”
(Sto
rnow
ay
Dia
mon
d Cor
pora
tion
- N
I 43
-101
Rep
ort-
2013
).
7 Ren
ard
8 68
9074
58
5558
5 80
x 5
0 8.
0 20
02
“Dia
trem
e-zo
ne k
imbe
rlite
with
over
all r
egul
ar s
hape
an
d su
b-ci
rcul
ar s
hape
at
surf
ace”
(Sto
rnow
ay
Dia
mon
d Cor
pora
tion
- N
I 43
-101
Rep
ort-
2013
).
8 Ren
ard
9 68
8754
58
5539
8 16
3 x
35
10.0
20
03
“Low
er d
iatr
eme
to r
oot-
zone
kim
berlite.
Elo
ngat
e,
nort
h-so
uth
tren
ding
, el
liptica
l sha
pe a
t su
rfac
e.
Bod
y sh
ape
dips
to
the
east
with
dept
h. E
ntirel
y co
vere
d by
2-4
m d
eep
lake
“(Sto
rnow
ay D
iam
ond
Cor
pora
tion
- N
I 43
-101
Rep
ort-
2013
).
9 Ren
ard
10
6886
07
5857
159
370
x 12
3.
0 20
03
“Nor
th-n
orth
wes
t tr
endi
ng
dyke
-lik
e ki
mbe
rlite.
Po
ssib
le b
lind
intr
usio
n.
Alm
ost
entire
ly c
over
ed b
y 3
m d
eep
lake
” (S
torn
oway
D
iam
ond
Cor
pora
tion
- N
I 43
-101
Rep
ort-
2013
).
CARD
S E
valu
atio
n Rep
ort,
Sou
th L
G4-H
igh
East
mai
n (B
aie
Jam
es)
Kim
berlite
Proj
ect,
Que
bec
DIA
GN
OS I
nc.
25
M
ay 2
016
(Dec
embe
r 20
16 U
pdat
e)
Nr
Kim
berl
ite P
ipe
Occ
urr
ence
X
_N
AD
83
_U
TM
_Z
18
Y
_N
AD
83
_U
TM
_Z
18
D
imen
sion
s at
Su
rface
(m
)
Dep
th C
ove
r (m
) Y
ear
of
Dis
cove
ry
No
tes
Fro
m R
efer
ence
s
10
Lac
Bea
ver
Tich
1
6852
00
5782
600
1978
“La
kim
berlite
d'O
tish
est
co
mpo
sée
d'un
e ch
emin
ée
et d
e dy
kes
adja
cent
s de
di
men
sion
s va
riab
les.
Cet
te m
orph
olog
ie r
appe
lle
les
com
plex
es d
e ki
mbe
rlite
dési
gnés
com
me
" bl
ow "
qui
son
t de
s ch
emin
ées
embr
yonn
aire
s ra
ttac
hées
à d
es d
ykes
“ (S
igeo
m).
11
Lac
Bea
ver
Tich
2
6855
00
5782
150
1978
“La
kim
berlite
d'O
tish
est
co
mpo
sée
d'un
e ch
emin
ée
et d
e dy
kes
adja
cent
s de
di
men
sion
s va
riab
les.
Cet
te m
orph
olog
ie r
appe
lle
les
com
plex
es d
e ki
mbe
rlite
dési
gnés
com
me
" bl
ow "
qui
son
t de
s ch
emin
ées
embr
yonn
aire
s ra
ttac
hées
à d
es d
ykes
“ (S
igeo
m).
12
Lac
Bea
ver
Tich
3
6796
50
5763
600
1978
“La
kim
berlite
d'O
tish
est
co
mpo
sée
d'un
e ch
emin
ée
et d
e dy
kes
adja
cent
s de
di
men
sion
s va
riab
les.
Cet
te m
orph
olog
ie r
appe
lle
les
com
plex
es d
e ki
mbe
rlite
dési
gnés
com
me
" bl
ow "
qui
son
t de
s ch
emin
ées
embr
yonn
aire
s ra
ttac
hées
à d
es d
ykes
“ (S
igeo
m).
CARD
S E
valu
atio
n Rep
ort,
Sou
th L
G4-H
igh
East
mai
n (B
aie
Jam
es)
Kim
berlite
Proj
ect,
Que
bec
DIA
GN
OS I
nc.
26
M
ay 2
016
(Dec
embe
r 20
16 U
pdat
e)
Tabl
e 6:
Lis
t of
con
firm
ed n
egat
ive
anom
alie
s
Nr
Nr.
DD
H
Sig
eom
N
r. D
DH
O
rig
inal
X_
NA
D8
3_
UT
M_
Z1
8
Y_
NA
D8
3_
UT
M_
Z1
8
Yea
r
Dep
th
(m)
Lith
olo
gy
Sig
eom
N
r. R
epo
rt
Sig
eom
H
old
. N
ame
1 12
5336
36
3-03
-11
6732
30
5739
740
2003
62
GM
613
36
Doc
usci
ence
In
c,Ex
plor
atio
n D
ios
Inc
2 12
5335
36
3-03
-05
6732
30
5740
380
2003
11
I3
A,H
B,P
X,B
O,P
G,M
G
GM
613
36
Doc
usci
ence
In
c,Ex
plor
atio
n D
ios
Inc
3 12
5339
36
3-03
-23
6736
80
5741
550
2003
16
I1
B(B
O),
CL,
[IU
]I2J
G
M 6
1573
D
ocus
cien
ce
Inc,
Expl
orat
ion
Dio
s In
c
4 12
5341
36
3-03
-19
6737
80
5743
580
2003
25
M
12-I
1B
GM
615
73
Doc
usci
ence
In
c,Ex
plor
atio
n D
ios
Inc
5 12
5338
T-
04-0
4 67
3836
57
5147
0 20
04
243
I4P,
[EN
]I1B
-I1
B-I
4P
GM
615
22
Ditem
Ex
plor
atio
ns I
nc
6 12
5332
O
B 0
0-07
67
6164
57
5164
0 20
00
33
G
M 5
9943
D
item
Ex
plor
atio
ns I
nc
7 14
1150
W
B11
67
5636
57
5188
0 20
08
202
S1,
QZ,F
P,SR
/S4,
QZ,F
P,S
R
GM
639
86
Ditem
Ex
plor
atio
ns I
nc
8 14
1149
W
B08
68
2913
57
5603
0 20
08
228
S1,
QZ,F
P[FA
]/S6D
-S6D
,LM
[FA]
GM
639
86
Ditem
Ex
plor
atio
ns I
nc
9 14
5504
W
B13
68
9825
57
5723
0 20
10
43
S1,
QZ,S
R,P
G,F
K
GM
652
73
Ditem
Ex
plor
atio
ns I
nc
10
1253
28
OB 0
0-06
67
9030
57
5743
0 20
00
42
I3[a
e],M
G+
+/I
1B
GM
593
76
Ditem
Exp
lora
tion
In
c
11
1423
32
WB14
68
8800
57
5810
0 20
10
51
S1[
SA][
FA]S
R,P
G
GM
652
73
Ditem
Ex
plor
atio
ns I
nc
12
1473
16
WB15
69
2950
57
5846
0 20
10
40
S1[
SA]S
R,P
G
GM
652
73
Ditem
Ex
plor
atio
ns I
nc
13
1254
01
WB-0
3 68
2065
57
5881
0 20
07
151
M1,
HM
G
M 6
3719
D
item
Ex
plor
atio
ns I
nc
14
1385
10
WB12
67
6375
57
6353
0 20
08
172
V[S
C][
FO]
GM
639
86
Ditem
Ex
plor
atio
ns I
nc
15
4288
7 85
038-
01
6676
05
5763
700
2004
96
M
1,PY
,MG
-I1
G,P
Y G
M 6
1385
Ash
ton
Dia
mon
ds
(Can
ada)
In
c,D
iaqu
em I
nc
16
3668
1 85
037-
01
6681
80
5763
980
2004
10
2 M
1,PG
,BO
,QZ,H
B-
I1B/I
4P,S
T G
M 6
1385
Ash
ton
Dia
mon
ds
(Can
ada)
In
c,D
iaqu
em I
nc
CARD
S E
valu
atio
n Rep
ort,
Sou
th L
G4-H
igh
East
mai
n (B
aie
Jam
es)
Kim
berlite
Proj
ect,
Que
bec
DIA
GN
OS I
nc.
27
M
ay 2
016
(Dec
embe
r 20
16 U
pdat
e)
Nr
Nr.
DD
H
Sig
eom
N
r. D
DH
O
rig
inal
X_
NA
D8
3_
UT
M_
Z1
8
Y_
NA
D8
3_
UT
M_
Z1
8
Yea
r
Dep
th
(m)
Lith
olo
gy
Sig
eom
N
r. R
epo
rt
Sig
eom
H
old
. N
ame
17
4284
7 O
B 0
0-05
68
0759
57
6462
0 20
00
12
M16
,EP,
CC,P
Y G
M 5
9943
D
item
Ex
plor
atio
ns I
nc
18
4284
8 O
B 0
0-02
67
5320
57
6443
0 20
00
25
I1G
-I1
C,P
Y,CP
GM
599
43
Ditem
Ex
plor
atio
ns I
nc
19
3667
9 G
03-0
86-
02
6673
30
5764
260
2004
10
2 I1
G-I
4P-
I1G
/M1
GM
613
85
Ash
ton
Dia
mon
ds
(Can
ada)
In
c,D
iaqu
em I
nc
20
3668
0 G
03-0
86-
01
6673
30
5764
260
2009
10
2 M
1,[M
A],
[IU
]I1G
-I4P
-M
1,[I
U]I
1G
GM
613
85
Ash
ton
Dia
mon
ds
(Can
ada)
In
c,D
iaqu
em I
nc
21
4284
9 O
B 0
0-03
67
6928
57
6488
0 20
00
19
I4B,A
M,S
T,C
L,[e
n]I1
B
GM
599
43
Ditem
Ex
plor
atio
ns I
nc
22
4286
4 85
065-
01
6740
80
5765
410
2004
99
M
1-I1
B-I
1G-
M1/
I1G
,[EN
]M
1 G
M 6
1385
Ash
ton
Dia
mon
ds
(Can
ada)
In
c,D
iaqu
em I
nc
23
1448
20
MLO
-07-
01
6773
54
5770
790
2007
21
0
I2D
(I1B
)[EQ
][FA
]FP,
QZ,
AM
,MG
,Si,P
Y/I
3B
GM
649
66
Virgi
nia
Ener
gy
Res
ourc
es I
nc
24
4286
6 T-
04-0
3 67
3870
57
7287
0 20
04
78
M1,
[SH
]/I1
B,H
M,C
L G
M 6
1522
D
item
Ex
plor
atio
ns I
nc
25
4286
5 T-
04-0
2 67
7891
57
7537
0 20
04
66
M1,
BO
,HB/I
1G,N
G
GM
615
22
Ditem
Ex
plor
atio
ns I
nc
26
4286
1 12
5-02
-05
6835
47
5779
370
2002
35
M
22/I
1B
GM
605
15
Ditem
Ex
plor
atio
ns I
nc
27
4286
3 12
5-02
-06
6845
54
5779
750
2002
21
I1
B-M
1(BO
)-I1
G/M
1(BO
)-I1
G
GM
605
15
Ditem
Ex
plor
atio
ns I
nc
28
4285
9 12
5-02
-04
6834
70
5779
930
2002
45
M
22/I
1B
GM
605
15
Ditem
Ex
plor
atio
ns I
nc
29
1405
45
DIO
-45
6952
50
5803
270
2008
40
I3
A[G
M][
EQ]
AM
,PG
,MG
G
M 6
3933
Ex
plor
atio
n D
ios
Inc
30
1405
44
ST-
2 70
1935
58
0811
0 20
08
39
I1B[G
M][
EQ]
PG,F
P,Q
Z,M
G[F
A]S
i,EP
GM
639
33
Expl
orat
ion
Dio
s In
c
31
9447
5 D
ORO
T8-
01
6831
75
5807
610
2006
91
V3B
[ME]
[FO
],CB-I
1N
GM
627
20
Res
sour
ces
Dia
nor
Inc
32
1372
42
ST-
5 70
2205
58
0873
0 20
08
56
I1C,B
O[E
Q]P
G,Q
Z,F
P,M
G-
I3A[I
U]-
I1G
[IU
]HM
GM
639
33
Expl
orat
ion
Dio
s In
c
CARD
S E
valu
atio
n Rep
ort,
Sou
th L
G4-H
igh
East
mai
n (B
aie
Jam
es)
Kim
berlite
Proj
ect,
Que
bec
DIA
GN
OS I
nc.
28
M
ay 2
016
(Dec
embe
r 20
16 U
pdat
e)
Nr
Nr.
DD
H
Sig
eom
N
r. D
DH
O
rig
inal
X_
NA
D8
3_
UT
M_
Z1
8
Y_
NA
D8
3_
UT
M_
Z1
8
Yea
r
Dep
th
(m)
Lith
olo
gy
Sig
eom
N
r. R
epo
rt
Sig
eom
H
old
. N
ame
33
9447
6 33
C-0
8 68
1035
58
1058
0 20
05
94
I1C[M
A][
HJ]
[PG
][G
F]/M
16[
HJ]
G
M 6
2953
Ex
plor
atio
n D
ios
Inc
34
9412
5 02
-P54
67
3920
58
2127
0 20
02
74
I1B(M
22)[
FO],
FK,B
O
GM
605
43
Res
sour
ces
Maj
esco
r In
c
35
1407
67
P-66
65
2222
58
2077
0 20
08
80
I1B[G
G][
PG]
FP,P
G,B
O,Q
Z
GM
639
33
Expl
orat
ion
Dio
s In
c
36
1378
77
02-P
20
6568
80
5823
280
2002
60
M
22
GM
605
43
Res
sour
ces
Maj
esco
r In
c
37
9412
3 33
C-1
0 68
6290
58
2873
0 20
05
19
I3A[H
J]
GM
629
53
Expl
orat
ion
Dio
s In
c
38
9412
2 33
C-0
9 68
6435
58
2881
0 20
05
27
I3A[H
J]
GM
629
53
Expl
orat
ion
Dio
s In
c
39
9412
4 33
C-1
1 68
6802
58
2905
0 20
05
23
I3A[H
J]
GM
629
53
Expl
orat
ion
Dio
s In
c
40
9412
1 33
C-0
7 68
6975
58
2912
0 20
05
126
V3B
(M16
)[M
A]/
I1N
/I1F
[IU
],Q
Z+
G
M 6
1769
Ex
plor
atio
n D
ios
Inc
41
9411
8 02
-P4A
66
9960
58
2985
0 20
02
81
M22
,FK,B
O,
CL
GM
605
43
Res
sour
ces
Maj
esco
r In
c
42
1407
60
02-P
59
6584
50
5830
420
2002
51
I1
B/I
1C/M
1,BO
G
M 6
0543
Res
sour
ces
Maj
esco
r In
c
43
1378
87
PCSH
-9
6496
47
5830
780
2008
67
I1
C,B
O[P
O]F
P,PG
,QZ,B
O,
AM
,MG
,HM
G
M 6
3933
Ex
plor
atio
n D
ios
Inc
44
1378
82
33C-0
2 64
6209
58
3072
0 20
04
93
M1,
BO
[GF]
[G
M],
MG
[DI]
G
M 6
1769
Ex
plor
atio
n D
ios
Inc
45
1407
64
33C-0
1 64
6209
58
3072
0 20
04
144
M1,
BO
[GF]
[G
M],
MG
[DI]
G
M 6
1769
Ex
plor
atio
n D
ios
Inc
46
1378
76
02-P
38
6682
70
5831
590
2002
57
I1
B,F
P[FO
] G
M 6
0543
Res
sour
ces
Maj
esco
r In
c
47
1407
68
PCSH
-10
6491
97
5831
290
2008
57
I1C,B
O[P
O],
FP[G
M][
GG
]PG
,QZ,F
P,BO
,AM
,MG
GM
639
33
Expl
orat
ion
Dio
s In
c
48
1378
88
PCSH
-11
6511
47
5831
620
2008
60
I2
J[PO
]FP,
CL
,PG
,BO
,HM
G
M 6
3933
Ex
plor
atio
n D
ios
Inc
49
1407
59
02-P
37
6673
90
5832
610
2002
62
I1
B,B
O[G
M]
GM
605
43
Res
sour
ces
Maj
esco
r In
c
50
1382
15
HCSH
-14
7030
85
5834
290
2008
56
M6(
I2J)
BO
[EQ
][FO
]PG
,BO
,QZ,F
P-[I
N]I
1G,B
O
GM
639
33
Expl
orat
ion
Dio
s In
c
CARD
S E
valu
atio
n Rep
ort,
Sou
th L
G4-H
igh
East
mai
n (B
aie
Jam
es)
Kim
berlite
Proj
ect,
Que
bec
DIA
GN
OS I
nc.
29
M
ay 2
016
(Dec
embe
r 20
16 U
pdat
e)
Nr
Nr.
DD
H
Sig
eom
N
r. D
DH
O
rig
inal
X_
NA
D8
3_
UT
M_
Z1
8
Y_
NA
D8
3_
UT
M_
Z1
8
Yea
r
Dep
th
(m)
Lith
olo
gy
Sig
eom
N
r. R
epo
rt
Sig
eom
H
old
. N
ame
51
1378
83
33C-0
3 64
7021
58
3240
0 20
04
121
I1B,F
P[G
F][
GM
][EQ
]QZ,
BO
,MG
[DI]
[IU
]
GM
617
69
Expl
orat
ion
Dio
s In
c
52
1378
84
33C-0
4B
6463
19
5832
410
2004
23
GM
617
69
Expl
orat
ion
Dio
s In
c
53
1407
65
33C-0
4A
6463
19
5832
410
2004
17
GM
617
69
Expl
orat
ion
Dio
s In
c
54
1378
85
33C-0
6 64
5232
58
3304
0 20
04
124
M6,
BO
,[G
M],
PG,[
FO]-
I1B[I
U]F
p,P
G,Q
Z,B
O,M
G
GM
617
69
Expl
orat
ion
Dio
s In
c
55
1407
69
PCSH
-12
6500
67
5834
590
2008
75
I1
G,F
P,PG
,BO
,QZ,M
G-
I2J[
IU]
GM
639
33
Expl
orat
ion
Dio
s In
c
56
1415
58
HCSH
-17
6938
30
5836
390
2008
38
I1
C,B
O[E
Q],
PG,F
P,Q
Z,B
O,M
G
GM
639
33
Expl
orat
ion
Dio
s In
c
57
1407
66
33C-0
5 64
7329
58
3516
0 20
04
101
M1,
BO
[GF]
[G
M]
GM
617
69
Expl
orat
ion
Dio
s In
c
58
1378
89
PCSH
-14
6521
67
5835
820
2008
64
I1
C,B
O[P
O]F
P,PG
,QZ,B
O,
AM
,MG
G
M 6
3933
Ex
plor
atio
n D
ios
Inc
59
1407
70
PCSH
-15
6554
07
5837
380
2008
42
M6,
BO
,PG
,FP
,QZ,M
G-
[IN
]I1G
-[I
N]I
2J
GM
639
33
Expl
orat
ion
Dio
s In
c
60
1378
79
02-P
9 66
6357
58
3801
0 20
02
75
I1B,F
P G
M 6
0543
Res
sour
ces
Maj
esco
r In
c
61
9411
7 02
-P5
6721
80
5838
240
2002
78
I1
C
GM
605
43
Res
sour
ces
Maj
esco
r In
c
62
1378
86
P-69
65
3196
58
3838
0 20
08
63
I1C[P
O]F
P,B
O,P
G,Q
Z,B
O,
AM
,MG
G
M 6
3933
Ex
plor
atio
n D
ios
Inc
63
1403
49
G02
-022
-01
67
8202
58
4050
0 20
07
133
M1-
I1/I
1G[F
O]Q
Z,F
P,BO
,MG
[D
I],P
Y[D
I]
GM
631
58
Ash
ton
Dia
mon
ds
(Can
ada)
In
c,D
iaqu
em I
nc
64
9411
6 02
-P35
67
3320
58
4201
0 20
02
53
I1B,B
O,F
K/M
8(BO
)[M
A]-
M22
G
M 6
0543
Res
sour
ces
Maj
esco
r In
c
65
1407
62
02-P
10
6641
50
5843
250
2002
99
M
1,BO
/I1B
,BG
M 6
0543
Res
sour
ces
CARD
S E
valu
atio
n Rep
ort,
Sou
th L
G4-H
igh
East
mai
n (B
aie
Jam
es)
Kim
berlite
Proj
ect,
Que
bec
DIA
GN
OS I
nc.
30
M
ay 2
016
(Dec
embe
r 20
16 U
pdat
e)
Nr
Nr.
DD
H
Sig
eom
N
r. D
DH
O
rig
inal
X_
NA
D8
3_
UT
M_
Z1
8
Y_
NA
D8
3_
UT
M_
Z1
8
Yea
r
Dep
th
(m)
Lith
olo
gy
Sig
eom
N
r. R
epo
rt
Sig
eom
H
old
. N
ame
O
Maj
esco
r In
c
66
9412
0 G
02-0
02-
01
6810
70
5844
100
2005
15
0 M
1/I1
D-
I1G
,BO
G
M 6
1692
Ash
ton
Dia
mon
ds
(Can
ada)
In
c,D
iaqu
em I
nc
67
1378
78
02-P
7B
6612
10
5843
420
2002
51
I1
B
GM
605
43
Res
sour
ces
Maj
esco
r In
c
68
1378
80
02-P
7A
6612
10
5843
540
2002
51
M
1(M
4)/I
1B,
FP[Z
F]
GM
605
43
Res
sour
ces
Maj
esco
r In
c
69
9411
9 02
-P33
67
6320
58
4535
0 20
02
60
M22
(M1,
I1B
?),B
O
GM
605
43
Res
sour
ces
Maj
esco
r In
c
70
1407
61
02-P
1 65
8465
58
4638
0 20
02
27
I1B,F
P/M
1,B
O,/
I1B,B
O
GM
605
43
Res
sour
ces
Maj
esco
r In
c
71
1369
47
D06
-15
6523
37
5847
450
2008
63
I1
G
GM
639
33
Expl
orat
ion
Dio
s In
c
72
3273
4 02
-P31
67
4650
58
4822
0 20
02
50
M22
,BO
-M1-
M22
G
M 6
0543
Res
sour
ces
Maj
esco
r In
c
73
1369
28
02-P
51
6610
50
5849
150
2002
54
M
1,BO
,SR
GM
605
43
Res
sour
ces
Maj
esco
r In
c
74
3273
5 02
-P22
67
7485
58
4980
0 20
02
51
I1B,F
K-
M1,
BO
G
M 6
0543
Res
sour
ces
Maj
esco
r In
c
75
3274
5 85
124-
01
6890
75
5852
700
9999
19
5 M
1[gf
](M
G)
+[v
n]I1
G
GM
612
86
Ash
ton
Dia
mon
ds
(Can
ada)
In
c,D
iaqu
em I
nc
76
1369
46
D06
-07
6534
68
5852
250
2008
39
I2
J[G
F][G
M]
[EQ
]BO
,PG
,Q
Z,M
G
GM
639
33
Expl
orat
ion
Dio
s In
c
77
3281
9 85
103-
02
6877
73
5853
610
2005
15
GM
616
92
Ash
ton
Dia
mon
ds
(Can
ada)
In
c,D
iaqu
em I
nc
78
3282
0 85
103-
03
6877
73
5853
610
2005
27
0
M1[
sa]-
M1(
I1B)[
gm][
gg]/
M1-
I1B[b
r](H
M)
+
GM
616
92
Ash
ton
Dia
mon
ds
(Can
ada)
In
c,D
iaqu
em I
nc
79
3266
3 85
103-
01
6876
71
5853
660
2003
17
1 I2
J-I3
A/I
1D,H
M+
,[br
] G
M 6
0463
Ash
ton
Dia
mon
ds
(Can
ada)
In
c,Soq
uem
Inc
80
3274
7 85
117-
01
6888
72
5853
750
9999
19
8 I1
B[g
m][
ma
] G
M 6
1286
Ash
ton
Dia
mon
ds
(Can
ada)
In
c,D
iaqu
em I
nc
CARD
S E
valu
atio
n Rep
ort,
Sou
th L
G4-H
igh
East
mai
n (B
aie
Jam
es)
Kim
berlite
Proj
ect,
Que
bec
DIA
GN
OS I
nc.
31
M
ay 2
016
(Dec
embe
r 20
16 U
pdat
e)
Nr
Nr.
DD
H
Sig
eom
N
r. D
DH
O
rig
inal
X_
NA
D8
3_
UT
M_
Z1
8
Y_
NA
D8
3_
UT
M_
Z1
8
Yea
r
Dep
th
(m)
Lith
olo
gy
Sig
eom
N
r. R
epo
rt
Sig
eom
H
old
. N
ame
81
3282
8 G
04-1
97-
01
6915
54
5854
380
2005
13
3 M
1[sa
]-M
1(I1
B)(
MG
)+
GM
616
92
Ash
ton
Dia
mon
ds
(Can
ada)
In
c,D
iaqu
em I
nc
82
3282
9 G
04-2
40-
01
6877
09
5854
390
2005
14
1 M
1[sa
][vn
]EP,
CC(M
G)+
(H
M)+
G
M 6
1692
Ash
ton
Dia
mon
ds
(Can
ada)
In
c,D
iaqu
em I
nc
83
3274
8 G
04-1
98-
01
6919
41
5854
690
9999
18
0 M
1-I1
G(M
G)+
+[
vn]Q
Z
GM
612
86
Ash
ton
Dia
mon
ds
(Can
ada)
In
c,D
iaqu
em I
nc
84
3273
6 02
-P27
67
0325
58
5456
0 20
02
51
M1,
BO
,[fo
]/I
1C-I
1G
GM
605
43
Res
sour
ces
Maj
esco
r In
c
85
3274
2 85
054-
01
6834
65
5855
360
2001
78
M
1[gf
][fo
]+[
IU]I
1G
GM
607
45
Ash
ton
Min
ing
Of
Can
ada
Inc
86
3266
5 85
161-
01
6883
21
5855
550
2003
96
I1
D-M
1-[a
e],H
M,S
R,[
br]
GM
604
63
Ash
ton
Dia
mon
ds
(Can
ada)
In
c,Soq
uem
Inc
87
3272
4 Ja
n-54
68
3455
58
5536
0 20
01
78
M1,
PG,H
B,B
O,M
G
GM
604
75
Soq
uem
Inc
88
3265
7 85
150-
01
6896
96
5855
730
2002
87
M
1PG
,BO
,HB
,QZ,[
iu]I
1G
GM
597
71
Soq
uem
Inc
89
3265
6 85
146-
01
6898
67
5855
880
2002
87
M1,
PG,H
B,B
O,Q
Z,G
R-
[iu]
I1D
-[s
h],B
O
GM
597
71
Soq
uem
Inc
90
3275
1 G
04-1
95-
01
6942
93
5856
230
9999
22
2 M
1[gf
]/I1
B-
I1G
G
M 6
1286
Ash
ton
Dia
mon
ds
(Can
ada)
In
c,D
iaqu
em I
nc
91
3272
5 Ja
n-56
68
6144
58
5600
0 20
01
54
M1,
PG,H
B,B
O,M
G
GM
604
75
Soq
uem
Inc
92
3273
8 85
056-
01
6861
49
5856
000
2001
54
M
1[gf
][fo
]+[
iu]I
1G
GM
607
45
Ash
ton
Min
ing
Of
Can
ada
Inc
93
3266
4 85
159-
01
6895
12
5856
340
2003
11
4
I1G
/M1-
I1D
,PY-
M1/
I1G
/I1D
-I1
D-I
1B,P
Y
GM
604
63
Ash
ton
Dia
mon
ds
(Can
ada)
In
c,Soq
uem
Inc
94
3283
7 G
04-2
48-
02
6863
81
5856
390
2004
10
5 M
1[sa
]/M
1(I
1B)[
gg][
iu]I
3B[g
f]
GM
617
71
Ash
ton
Dia
mon
ds
(Can
ada)
In
c,D
iaqu
em I
nc
CARD
S E
valu
atio
n Rep
ort,
Sou
th L
G4-H
igh
East
mai
n (B
aie
Jam
es)
Kim
berlite
Proj
ect,
Que
bec
DIA
GN
OS I
nc.
32
M
ay 2
016
(Dec
embe
r 20
16 U
pdat
e)
Nr
Nr.
DD
H
Sig
eom
N
r. D
DH
O
rig
inal
X_
NA
D8
3_
UT
M_
Z1
8
Y_
NA
D8
3_
UT
M_
Z1
8
Yea
r
Dep
th
(m)
Lith
olo
gy
Sig
eom
N
r. R
epo
rt
Sig
eom
H
old
. N
ame
95
3281
5 85
147-
01
6897
29
5856
700
2003
12
8
M1[
sa]/
I1B-
I1D
(MG
)++
,G
R,C
C,P
Y,PO
,MG
GM
612
88
Ash
ton
Dia
mon
ds
(Can
ada)
In
c,D
iaqu
em I
nc
96
3274
4 G
04-2
19-
01
6864
15
5856
780
9999
14
7
I1B[g
g][m
a]/I
3B[F
A]+
/M1[
gf][
iu]I
4P(
MG
)++
GM
612
86
Ash
ton
Dia
mon
ds
(Can
ada)
In
c,D
iaqu
em I
nc
97
3274
9 G
04-1
68-
01
6913
27
5857
580
9999
20
4 I1
B(I
1G)[
gg],
HM
++
/m1[
fa]+
+
GM
612
86
Ash
ton
Dia
mon
ds
(Can
ada)
In
c,D
iaqu
em I
nc
98
3275
2 G
04-2
02-
01
6928
45
5859
840
9999
24
0 M
1[gf
]/M
1(I
1G),
(MG
)+
GM
612
86
Ash
ton
Dia
mon
ds
(Can
ada)
In
c,D
iaqu
em I
nc
99
3275
0 G
04-1
94-
01
6873
83
5859
950
9999
13
3 M
1[gf
]/I1
G[i
u]I3
B
GM
612
86
Ash
ton
Dia
mon
ds
(Can
ada)
In
c,D
iaqu
em I
nc
100
3283
2 G
05-0
13-
01
6870
89
5871
330
2005
16
8 I1
B(B
O)+
(MG
)+,P
O/M
1[sa
] G
M 6
1692
Ash
ton
Dia
mon
ds
(Can
ada)
In
c,D
iaqu
em I
nc
101
3295
3 G
05-1
81-
01
6736
21
5872
670
2005
19
7 M
1[sa
]/M
1(I
1B)[
iu]I
4P(M
G)+
+,C
C+
+
GM
626
50
Ash
ton
Dia
mon
ds
(Can
ada)
In
c,D
iaqu
em I
nc
102
3295
4 G
05-1
81-
02
6736
21
5872
670
2005
13
4 M
1[sa
][iu
]I4
P(M
G)+
+,G
R[v
n]CC
GM
626
50
Ash
ton
Dia
mon
ds
(Can
ada)
In
c,D
iaqu
em I
nc
103
3295
5 G
05-1
81-
03
6733
48
5872
670
2005
17
0 M
1(I1
B)[
gg]
,HB,(
MG
)++
G
M 6
2650
Ash
ton
Dia
mon
ds
(Can
ada)
In
c,D
iaqu
em I
nc
104
3295
2 G
05-1
68-
01
6768
17
5874
310
2005
20
0 M
1(I1
B)[
gg]
GM
626
50
Ash
ton
Dia
mon
ds
(Can
ada)
In
c,D
iaqu
em I
nc
105
4285
5 D
DH
-336
-05
68
1285
57
6532
2 20
03
76
M1(
M16
),[f
o],
CB
GM
604
54
Doc
usci
ence
In
c,Res
sour
ces
Str
atec
o In
c
106
4285
0 D
DH
-336
-06
68
2068
57
6678
3 20
03
90
M1(
M16
)/I1
B(I
1G)-
I2J(
M1)
-I1B
G
M 6
0454
D
ocus
cien
ce
Inc,
Res
sour
ces
Str
atec
o In
c
107
4285
3 D
DH
-336
-02
68
3680
57
6553
0 20
03
87
I1B,M
G/M
1(I
1B)
GM
604
54
Doc
usci
ence
In
c,Res
sour
ces
Str
atec
o In
c
CARD
S E
valu
atio
n Rep
ort,
Sou
th L
G4-H
igh
East
mai
n (B
aie
Jam
es)
Kim
berlite
Proj
ect,
Que
bec
DIA
GN
OS I
nc.
33
M
ay 2
016
(Dec
embe
r 20
16 U
pdat
e)
Nr
Nr.
DD
H
Sig
eom
N
r. D
DH
O
rig
inal
X_
NA
D8
3_
UT
M_
Z1
8
Y_
NA
D8
3_
UT
M_
Z1
8
Yea
r
Dep
th
(m)
Lith
olo
gy
Sig
eom
N
r. R
epo
rt
Sig
eom
H
old
. N
ame
108
4285
1 D
DH
-336
-03
68
3655
57
6555
3 20
03
87
I1B(I
1G),
PY
GM
604
54
Doc
usci
ence
In
c,Res
sour
ces
Str
atec
o In
c
109
4285
4 D
DH
-336
-04
68
4453
57
6657
8 20
03
78
S4/
S1(
S4)
/S6-
I2J/
M1(
AM
)-M
16-I
1B-M
1
GM
604
54
Doc
usci
ence
In
c,Res
sour
ces
Str
atec
o In
c
110
4285
2 D
DH
-336
-01
68
4453
57
6742
5 20
03
83
M1(
I2J)
,BO
/I1B
(I1G
) G
M 6
0454
D
ocus
cien
ce
Inc,
Res
sour
ces
Str
atec
o In
c
111
4288
0 36
3-03
-02
6717
77
5755
710
2003
9
I1B,H
M,M
G,[
FO]
GM
615
73
Doc
usci
ence
In
c,Ex
plor
atio
n D
ios
Inc
CARD
S E
valu
atio
n Rep
ort,
Sou
th L
G4-H
igh
East
mai
n (B
aie
Jam
es)
Kim
berlite
Proj
ect,
Que
bec
DIA
GN
OS I
nc.
34
M
ay 2
016
(Dec
embe
r 20
16 U
pdat
e)
Fi
gure
6:
Trai
ning
poi
nts
CARDS Evaluation Report, South LG4-High Eastmain (Baie James) Kimberlite Project, Quebec
DIAGNOS Inc. 35 May 2016 (December 2016 Update)
9.0 MODELS Two prediction models were generated on the South LG4-High Eastmain (Baie James)
kimberlite project in order to optimize the scoring and training data sets. One model used
the Kimberlite Similarity (KSM) algorithm, while the other model was generated using the
Positive-Negative algorithm.
9.1 Kimberlite Similarity Model (KSM)
The KSM algorithm was applied to identify the possible kimberlite. The procedure computes,
over a moving window (300m x 300m), the similarity coefficient between the real magnetic
kimberlite anomaly and the magnetic data (RMI) over the LG4-High Eastmain (Baie James)
kimberlite project area. We used the signature of the 12 known kimberlite pipes over the
project area (Table 6).
The same procedure was applied with the derivative in z of magnetic data (RMI_dz) and the
analytical signal data (RMI_ASIG). We repeated the same method with a larger moving
window (500m x 500m).
For each one of the 6,669,056 points, we calculated 72 similarity coefficients with kimberlite
pipes (36 similarity coefficients with a 300m x 300m window and 36 other with a 500m
x500m window kimberlite), as shown in Tables 6 and 7.
For example, ρi
1 in Table 6 is the similarity coefficient between the 90,000 square meters
(300m x 300m) window around the Renard 1 kimberlite pipe and the same dimension
window around the point i by using the magnetic variable (RMI).
The ρi55 in Table 7 is the similarity coefficient between the 250,000 square meters (500m x
500m) window around the Renard 8 kimberlite pipe and the same dimension window around
the point i by using the derivative in z of magnetic data (RMI_dz).
CARD
S E
valu
atio
n Rep
ort,
Sou
th L
G4-H
igh
East
mai
n (B
aie
Jam
es)
Kim
berlite
Proj
ect,
Que
bec
DIA
GN
OS I
nc.
36
M
ay 2
016
(Dec
embe
r 20
16 U
pdat
e)
Ta
ble
7: S
imila
rity
coe
ffic
ient
s, w
indo
w s
ize
of 3
00 m
eter
s fo
r ki
mbe
rlite
pipe
s
Ren
ard
1 Ren
ard
2 Ren
ard
3 Ren
ard
4 Ren
ard
65
Ren
ard
7 Ren
ard
8 Ren
ard
9 Ren
ard
10
Lac
Bea
ver
Ti
ch 1
Lac
Bea
ver
Ti
ch 2
Lac
Bea
ver
Ti
ch 3
RM
I ρi 1
ρi 2 ρi 3
ρi 4 ρi 5
ρi 6 ρi 7
ρi 8 ρi 9
ρi 10
ρi 11
ρi 12
RM
I_dz
ρi 13
ρi 14
ρi 15
ρi 16
ρi 17
ρi 18
ρi 19
ρi 20
ρi 21
ρi 22
ρi 23
ρi 24
RM
I_ASIG
ρi 25
ρi 26
ρi 27
ρi 28
ρi 29
ρi 30
ρi 31
ρi 32
ρi 33
ρi 34
ρi 35
ρi 36
Tabl
e 8:
Sim
ilarity
coe
ffic
ient
s, w
indo
w s
ize
of 5
00 m
eter
s fo
r ki
mbe
rlite
pipe
s
Ren
ard
1 Ren
ard
2 Ren
ard
3 Ren
ard
4 Ren
ard
65
Ren
ard
7 Ren
ard
8 Ren
ard
9 Ren
ard
10
Lac
Bea
ver
Ti
ch 1
Lac
Bea
ver
Ti
ch 2
Lac
Bea
ver
Ti
ch 3
RM
I ρi 37
ρi 38
ρi 39
ρi 40
ρi 41
ρi 42
ρi 43
ρi 44
ρi 45
ρi 46
ρi 47
ρi 48
RM
I_dz
ρi 49
ρi 50
ρi 51
ρi 52
ρi 53
ρi 54
ρi 55
ρi 56
ρi 57
ρi 58
ρi 59
ρi 60
RM
I_ASIG
ρi 61
ρi 62
ρi 63
ρi 64
ρi 65
ρi 66
ρi 67
ρi 68
ρi 69
ρi 70
ρi 71
ρi 72
CARDS Evaluation Report, South LG4-High Eastmain (Baie James) Kimberlite Project, Quebec
DIAGNOS Inc. 37 May 2016 (December 2016 Update)
9.2 Positive-Negative Model The Positive-Negative model is based on decision trees of 552 variables in the database
(primary variables, derivative variables and neighboring variables).
A total of 500 Positive-Negative models for kimberlite pipes were run based on all 552
variables to find which of them discriminate the best positive sites versus negative sites.
These models have a very high performance (Table 8) with a good classification rate (1 for
kimberlite pipes model), high specificity (1 for kimberlite pipes model) and high sensitivity
(1 for kimberlite pipes model).
Table 9: Performance of Positive-Negative models for kimberlite pipes
Specificity 1
Sensitivity 1
False Positive 0
False Negative 0
Good classification rate 1
10.0 RESULTS The Kimberlite Similarity Model (KSM) for kimberlite pipes generated 72 similarity
coefficients for each unknown point. Only the points having at least one similarity coefficient
above 0.9 were retained. A total of 906,724 points were selected with this criteria and have
been scored by the 500 Positive-Negative models.
The rules of the Positive-Negative models were applied to classify the points that have at
least six similarity coefficients, among the 72 similarity coefficients, above 0.9. At last, 16
Kimberlite Pipe Targets (KPT_BJ_2016) with a similarity of 95% and 106 Kimberlite Pipe
Targets with a similarity of 90% were defined.
CARDS Evaluation Report, South LG4-High Eastmain (Baie James) Kimberlite Project, Quebec
DIAGNOS Inc. 38 May 2016 (December 2016 Update)
In May 2016 DIAGNOS staked 131 non-contiguous claim blocks covering two groups of 9
and 28 Kimberlite Pipe Targets based on two levels of similarity at 95% and 90%, beside
the new diamond Renard mine and the new 167 extension road (Figure 7).
Both Staked CARDS Kimberlite Pipe Targets groups are presented in Tables 10 and 11.
These tables include the following columns: Target id; Target (coordinates (X, Y); Similarity
(Positive-Negative Model); Frequency of the Absolute value of the Similarity Coefficients
above 0.9 (KSM); and actual Statut.
The list of 131 claims including permit numbers and area covered is presented in Table 12.
Table 10: Staked CARDS Kimberlite Pipe Targets – Similarity 95%
Nr Target_Id X
UTM NAD83 Z18
Y UTM
NAD83 Z18
Similarity (%)
Frequency of the
Absolute Value of the
Similarity Coefficients Above 0.9
(KSM)
Statut
1 Kimb_BJ_2016_008 650460 5849040 95 7 Diagnos Inc.
2 Kimb_BJ_2016_060 642780 5805480 95 6 Diagnos Inc.
3 Kimb_BJ_2016_071 664560 5847360 95 6 Diagnos Inc.
4 Kimb_BJ_2016_072 664560 5847420 95 6 Diagnos Inc.
5 Kimb_BJ_2016_073 664620 5847420 95 6 Diagnos Inc.
6 Kimb_BJ_2016_086 677580 5759760 95 6 Diagnos Inc.
7 Kimb_BJ_2016_090 679920 5792880 95 6 Diagnos Inc.
8 Kimb_BJ_2016_112 695460 5861580 95 6 Diagnos Inc.
9 Kimb_BJ_2016_117 700740 5860080 95 6 Diagnos Inc.
CARDS Evaluation Report, South LG4-High Eastmain (Baie James) Kimberlite Project, Quebec
DIAGNOS Inc. 39 May 2016 (December 2016 Update)
Table 11: CARDS Kimberlite Pipe Targets – Similarity 90%
Nr Target_Id X
UTM NAD83 Z18
Y UTM
NAD83 Z18
Similarity (%)
Frequency of the
Absolute Value of the
Similarity Coefficients Above 0.9
(KSM)
Statut
1 Kimb_BJ_2016_007 642720 5780940 90 7 Diagnos Inc.
2 Kimb_BJ_2016_014 693060 5863800 90 7 Diagnos Inc.
3 Kimb_BJ_2016_015 694740 5864760 90 7 Diagnos Inc.
4 Kimb_BJ_2016_059 637800 5844060 90 6 Diagnos Inc.
5 Kimb_BJ_2016_061 644400 5806860 90 6 Diagnos Inc.
6 Kimb_BJ_2016_062 646440 5807520 90 6 Diagnos Inc.
7 Kimb_BJ_2016_063 646500 5807580 90 6 Diagnos Inc.
8 Kimb_BJ_2016_064 646560 5807580 90 6 Diagnos Inc.
9 Kimb_BJ_2016_065 654240 5851440 90 6 Diagnos Inc.
10 Kimb_BJ_2016_066 654240 5851500 90 6 Diagnos Inc.
11 Kimb_BJ_2016_067 656220 5784660 90 6 Diagnos Inc.
12 Kimb_BJ_2016_068 660120 5790840 90 6 Diagnos Inc.
13 Kimb_BJ_2016_069 660180 5782620 90 6 Diagnos Inc.
14 Kimb_BJ_2016_070 660240 5782560 90 6 Diagnos Inc.
15 Kimb_BJ_2016_074 664680 5851860 90 6 Diagnos Inc.
16 Kimb_BJ_2016_075 664680 5851920 90 6 Diagnos Inc.
17 Kimb_BJ_2016_076 671700 5822580 90 6 Diagnos Inc.
18 Kimb_BJ_2016_077 671880 5751840 90 6 Diagnos Inc.
19 Kimb_BJ_2016_079 673260 5788500 90 6 Diagnos Inc.
20 Kimb_BJ_2016_084 676560 5760000 90 6 Diagnos Inc.
21 Kimb_BJ_2016_085 676620 5760000 90 6 Diagnos Inc.
22 Kimb_BJ_2016_092 684240 5829360 90 6 Diagnos Inc.
23 Kimb_BJ_2016_093 684240 5829420 90 6 Diagnos Inc.
24 Kimb_BJ_2016_108 691080 5873160 90 6 Diagnos Inc.
25 Kimb_BJ_2016_109 693060 5863860 90 6 Diagnos Inc.
26 Kimb_BJ_2016_113 698100 5834940 90 6 Diagnos Inc.
27 Kimb_BJ_2016_116 700560 5857740 90 6 Diagnos Inc.
28 Kimb_BJ_2016_118 701280 5857500 90 6 Diagnos Inc.
CARDS Evaluation Report, South LG4-High Eastmain (Baie James) Kimberlite Project, Quebec
DIAGNOS Inc. 40 May 2016 (December 2016 Update)
Table 12: Claim List
Claim Nr. NTS
Sheet Area (Ha)
Date of Registration
Expiry Date
Required Work ($)
Required Fees ($)
Claim Holder
2450996 32P15 53.19 2016-07-07 2018-07-06 780 59.67 Diagnos inc.
2450997 32P15 53.19 2016-07-07 2018-07-06 780 59.67 Diagnos inc.
2450998 32P15 53.18 2016-07-07 2018-07-06 780 59.67 Diagnos inc.
2450999 32P15 53.18 2016-07-07 2018-07-06 780 59.67 Diagnos inc.
2451000 32P16 53.19 2016-07-07 2018-07-06 780 59.67 Diagnos inc.
2451001 32P16 53.19 2016-07-07 2018-07-06 780 59.67 Diagnos inc.
2451002 33A08 52.77 2016-07-07 2018-07-06 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451003 33A08 52.77 2016-07-07 2018-07-06 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451004 33A08 52.76 2016-07-07 2018-07-06 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451005 33A08 52.76 2016-07-07 2018-07-06 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451006 33A07 52.6 2016-07-07 2018-07-06 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451007 33A07 52.61 2016-07-07 2018-07-06 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451008 33A07 52.6 2016-07-07 2018-07-06 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451009 33A07 52.6 2016-07-07 2018-07-06 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451010 33A07 52.6 2016-07-07 2018-07-06 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451011 33A07 52.6 2016-07-07 2018-07-06 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451012 33A07 52.59 2016-07-07 2018-07-06 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451013 33A07 52.59 2016-07-07 2018-07-06 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451014 33A07 52.59 2016-07-07 2018-07-06 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451015 33A07 52.59 2016-07-07 2018-07-06 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451016 33A07 52.59 2016-07-07 2018-07-06 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451017 33A07 52.59 2016-07-07 2018-07-06 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451018 33A07 52.58 2016-07-07 2018-07-06 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451019 33A07 52.58 2016-07-07 2018-07-06 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451032 33A10 52.2 2016-07-08 2018-07-07 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451033 33A10 52.2 2016-07-08 2018-07-07 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451034 33A10 52.19 2016-07-08 2018-07-07 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451035 33A10 52.19 2016-07-08 2018-07-07 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451036 33A10 52.18 2016-07-08 2018-07-07 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451037 33A10 52.18 2016-07-08 2018-07-07 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451038 33A10 52.18 2016-07-08 2018-07-07 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451039 33A15 52.17 2016-07-08 2018-07-07 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451040 33A15 52.17 2016-07-08 2018-07-07 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451041 33A15 52.17 2016-07-08 2018-07-07 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451042 33A15 52.15 2016-07-08 2018-07-07 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451043 33A15 52.15 2016-07-08 2018-07-07 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451044 33A15 52.15 2016-07-08 2018-07-07 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
CARDS Evaluation Report, South LG4-High Eastmain (Baie James) Kimberlite Project, Quebec
DIAGNOS Inc. 41 May 2016 (December 2016 Update)
Claim Nr. NTS
Sheet Area (Ha)
Date of Registration
Expiry Date
Required Work ($)
Required Fees ($)
Claim Holder
2451045 33A15 52.14 2016-07-08 2018-07-07 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451046 33A15 52.14 2016-07-08 2018-07-07 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451047 33A15 52.14 2016-07-08 2018-07-07 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451048 33A15 52.13 2016-07-08 2018-07-07 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451049 33A15 52.13 2016-07-08 2018-07-07 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451050 33A15 52.13 2016-07-08 2018-07-07 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451051 33A15 52.13 2016-07-08 2018-07-07 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451052 33A15 52.13 2016-07-08 2018-07-07 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451053 33A15 52.12 2016-07-08 2018-07-07 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451054 33A15 52.12 2016-07-08 2018-07-07 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451055 33A15 52.12 2016-07-08 2018-07-07 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451056 33A15 52.12 2016-07-08 2018-07-07 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451057 33A15 52.12 2016-07-08 2018-07-07 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451058 33A09 52.45 2016-07-08 2018-07-07 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451059 33A09 52.45 2016-07-08 2018-07-07 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451060 33A09 52.44 2016-07-08 2018-07-07 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451061 33A09 52.44 2016-07-08 2018-07-07 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451062 33A09 52.39 2016-07-08 2018-07-07 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451063 33A09 52.39 2016-07-08 2018-07-07 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451064 33A09 52.39 2016-07-08 2018-07-07 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451065 33A09 52.38 2016-07-08 2018-07-07 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451066 33A09 52.38 2016-07-08 2018-07-07 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451067 33A09 52.38 2016-07-08 2018-07-07 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451068 33A09 52.34 2016-07-08 2018-07-07 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451069 33A09 52.34 2016-07-08 2018-07-07 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451070 33A09 52.33 2016-07-08 2018-07-07 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451071 33A09 52.33 2016-07-08 2018-07-07 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451072 33A16 52.1 2016-07-08 2018-07-07 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451073 33A16 52.1 2016-07-08 2018-07-07 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451074 33A16 52.09 2016-07-08 2018-07-07 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451075 33A16 52.09 2016-07-08 2018-07-07 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451076 33A16 52.08 2016-07-08 2018-07-07 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451077 33A16 52.08 2016-07-08 2018-07-07 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451078 33A16 52.07 2016-07-08 2018-07-07 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451079 33A16 52.07 2016-07-08 2018-07-07 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451080 33A16 52.06 2016-07-08 2018-07-07 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451081 33A16 52.06 2016-07-08 2018-07-07 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451082 33A16 52.06 2016-07-08 2018-07-07 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451083 33A16 52.05 2016-07-08 2018-07-07 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
CARDS Evaluation Report, South LG4-High Eastmain (Baie James) Kimberlite Project, Quebec
DIAGNOS Inc. 42 May 2016 (December 2016 Update)
Claim Nr. NTS
Sheet Area (Ha)
Date of Registration
Expiry Date
Required Work ($)
Required Fees ($)
Claim Holder
2451084 33A16 52.05 2016-07-08 2018-07-07 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451085 33A16 52.05 2016-07-08 2018-07-07 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451086 33A16 52.02 2016-07-08 2018-07-07 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451087 33A16 52.02 2016-07-08 2018-07-07 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451088 33A16 52.01 2016-07-08 2018-07-07 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451089 33A16 52.01 2016-07-08 2018-07-07 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451090 33A16 52.02 2016-07-08 2018-07-07 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451091 33A16 52.02 2016-07-08 2018-07-07 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451092 33A16 52.02 2016-07-08 2018-07-07 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451093 33A16 52.02 2016-07-08 2018-07-07 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451094 33A16 52.01 2016-07-08 2018-07-07 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451095 33A16 52.01 2016-07-08 2018-07-07 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451096 33A16 51.92 2016-07-08 2018-07-07 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451097 33A16 51.92 2016-07-08 2018-07-07 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451098 33A16 51.93 2016-07-08 2018-07-07 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451099 33A16 51.91 2016-07-08 2018-07-07 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451100 33A16 51.91 2016-07-08 2018-07-07 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451101 33A16 51.92 2016-07-08 2018-07-07 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451189 32P16 53.12 2016-07-12 2018-07-11 780 59.67 Diagnos inc.
2451190 32P16 53.12 2016-07-12 2018-07-11 780 59.67 Diagnos inc.
2451191 32P16 53.12 2016-07-12 2018-07-11 780 59.67 Diagnos inc.
2451192 32P16 53.12 2016-07-12 2018-07-11 780 59.67 Diagnos inc.
2451193 32P16 53.11 2016-07-12 2018-07-11 780 59.67 Diagnos inc.
2451194 32P16 53.11 2016-07-12 2018-07-11 780 59.67 Diagnos inc.
2451195 32P16 53.11 2016-07-12 2018-07-11 780 59.67 Diagnos inc.
2451196 32P16 53.11 2016-07-12 2018-07-11 780 59.67 Diagnos inc.
2451197 32P16 53.1 2016-07-12 2018-07-11 780 59.67 Diagnos inc.
2451198 32P16 53.1 2016-07-12 2018-07-11 780 59.67 Diagnos inc.
2451199 32P16 53.1 2016-07-12 2018-07-11 780 59.67 Diagnos inc.
2451200 32P16 53.1 2016-07-12 2018-07-11 780 59.67 Diagnos inc.
2451201 33A01 52.81 2016-07-12 2018-07-11 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451202 33A01 52.81 2016-07-12 2018-07-11 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451203 33A01 52.8 2016-07-12 2018-07-11 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451204 33A02 52.87 2016-07-12 2018-07-11 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451205 33A02 52.87 2016-07-12 2018-07-11 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451206 33A02 52.86 2016-07-12 2018-07-11 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451207 33A02 52.86 2016-07-12 2018-07-11 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451208 33A02 52.87 2016-07-12 2018-07-11 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451209 33A02 52.87 2016-07-12 2018-07-11 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
CARDS Evaluation Report, South LG4-High Eastmain (Baie James) Kimberlite Project, Quebec
DIAGNOS Inc. 43 May 2016 (December 2016 Update)
Claim Nr. NTS
Sheet Area (Ha)
Date of Registration
Expiry Date
Required Work ($)
Required Fees ($)
Claim Holder
2451210 33A02 52.85 2016-07-12 2018-07-11 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451211 33A02 52.85 2016-07-12 2018-07-11 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451212 33A02 52.86 2016-07-12 2018-07-11 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451213 33A02 52.86 2016-07-12 2018-07-11 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451214 33A02 52.85 2016-07-12 2018-07-11 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451215 33A02 52.85 2016-07-12 2018-07-11 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451216 33A02 52.84 2016-07-12 2018-07-11 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451217 33A02 52.84 2016-07-12 2018-07-11 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451218 33A02 52.84 2016-07-12 2018-07-11 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451219 33A02 52.83 2016-07-12 2018-07-11 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451220 33A02 52.83 2016-07-12 2018-07-11 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451221 33A02 52.83 2016-07-12 2018-07-11 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451222 33A02 52.78 2016-07-12 2018-07-11 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451223 33A02 52.78 2016-07-12 2018-07-11 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451224 33A02 52.77 2016-07-12 2018-07-11 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
2451225 33A02 52.77 2016-07-12 2018-07-11 87.75 138.24 Diagnos inc.
CARDS Evaluation Report, South LG4-High Eastmain (Baie James) Kimberlite Project, Quebec
DIAGNOS Inc. 44 May 2016 (December 2016 Update)
Figure 7: Diagnos Staked CARDS Kimberlite Targets
CARDS Evaluation Report, South LG4-High Eastmain (Baie James) Kimberlite Project, Quebec
DIAGNOS Inc. 45 May 2016 (December 2016 Update)
11.0 CONCLUSION & RECOMMENDATIONS
The South LG4-High Eastmain (Baie James) kimberlite project revealed to be well suited for
analysis by CARDS due to the quality of geophysical data and the distribution of training
data throughout the study area.
CARDS models have been able to outline areas with interesting potential for kimberlites that
merit further exploration efforts. Two categories of 16 and 106 Kimberlite Pipe Targets with
a similarity of 95% and 90% have been generated from CARDS modeling over the South
LG4-High Eastmain (Baie James) kimberlite project.
In May 2016 DIAGNOS staked 131 non-contiguous claim blocks covering two groups of 9
and 28 Kimberlite Pipe Targets based on two levels of similarity at 95% and 90%, beside
the new diamond Renard mine and the new 167 extension road.
Considering these kimberlite targets generated by CARDS methodology for screening out
and prioritizing anomalies, a first Phase Exploration Program is suggested, for a total
amount $154,551.95. This program will be conducted on 131 new property claims regarding
37 CARDS kimberlite targets, located within a radius of 20 to 80 km from the Eastmain Mine
Camp of Eastmain Resources (Figure 7). This camp will be used to house workers and to
service the property.
During the preparation stage, these 37 kimberlite targets will be plotted on a GIS system,
along with other geoscientific information (historical assessments reports and maps),
satellite images, geology or air-photos and local physiography to maximize the prospecting
efficiency.
During the field work, these 37 kimberlite targets will be visited by one (1) kimberlite
geologist and accompanied by one (1) assistant/geologist crew. The crew will have to
validate the accurate kimberlite targets predicted by CARDS, evaluate the geological context
and collect rock samples over available outcrops and glacial till and fluvial samples to
determine the abundance and nature of the kimberlitic indicator minerals that they contain.
The estimated detailed budget for this Phase of exploration is shown on the next page.
CARD
S E
valu
atio
n Rep
ort,
Sou
th L
G4-H
igh
East
mai
n (B
aie
Jam
es)
Kim
berlite
Proj
ect,
Que
bec
DIA
GN
OS I
nc.
46
M
ay 2
016
(Dec
embe
r 20
16 U
pdat
e)
BU
DG
ET
Th
e es
tim
ated
cos
ts a
ssoc
iate
d w
ith
the
pres
ente
d ex
plor
atio
n pr
ogra
m a
re s
how
n in
the
fol
low
ing
tabl
e. T
hese
cos
ts a
re
estim
ated
and
are
sub
ject
to
chan
ge.
TPS &
TVQ
are
not
incl
uded
.
Man
/D
ays
qu
an
tity
R
ate
T
ota
ls
Pre
pari
ng
Wo
rk
Pr
opos
al,
Map
s, D
ata
com
pila
tion
5
$
3
50.0
0
$
1,
750.
00
Equi
pmen
t M
isc.
Field
Pro
spect
ing
an
d S
am
pli
ng
Geo
logi
st
14
$
750
.00
$
10
,500
.00
Ass
ista
nt G
eolo
gist
14
$
4
50.0
0
$
6,
300.
00
T
ran
spo
rtati
on
Tr
uck
(1)
16
$
220
.00
$
3,
520.
00
Fuel
(m
ob,
dem
ob)
$
700
.00
H
elic
opte
r (m
ob,
dem
ob)
2
$
2,50
0.00
$
5,
000.
00
Hel
icop
ter
(min
3h)
15
$
3,30
0.00
$
49
,500
.00
Hel
icop
ter
(fue
l)
15
$
900
.00
$
13
,500
.00
T
ele
com
mu
nic
ati
on
Po
rtab
le r
adio
VH
F (3
)
3 $
91.0
0
$
273
.00
CARD
S E
valu
atio
n Rep
ort,
Sou
th L
G4-H
igh
East
mai
n (B
aie
Jam
es)
Kim
berlite
Proj
ect,
Que
bec
DIA
GN
OS I
nc.
47
M
ay 2
016
(Dec
embe
r 20
16 U
pdat
e)
Man
/D
ays
qu
an
tity
R
ate
T
ota
ls
Acc
om
od
ati
on
& M
eals
G
eolo
gist
16
$
3
00.0
0
$
4,
800.
00
Ass
ista
nt G
eolo
gist
16
$
3
00.0
0
$
4,
800.
00
Hel
icop
ter's
Pilo
t
14
$
300
.00
$
4,
200.
00
Hel
icop
ter's
Mec
hani
c
14
$
300
.00
$
4,
200.
00
S
am
ple
s fo
r h
eavy
min
era
ls (
74
)
(37
targ
ets
x 2
sam
ple
s)
Tran
spor
tation
$
500
.00
$
50
0.00
Ana
lyse
$
400
.00
$
2
9,60
0.00
C
rew
's F
ield
Su
pp
lies
$
5,0
00.0
0
Rep
ort
red
act
ion
(G
eo
log
ist)
15
$
3
50.0
0
$
5,25
0.00
GR
AN
D T
OT
AL
: $
1
49
,39
3.0
0
Res
pect
fully
Sub
mitte
d
Gri
gor
Heb
a, P
h.D
. G
eolo
gist
, P.
Geo
Ria
dh K
obbi
, D
ata
Mod
elin
g M
anag
er
CARDS Evaluation Report, South LG4-High Eastmain (Baie James) Kimberlite Project, Quebec
DIAGNOS Inc. 48 May 2016 (December 2016 Update)
12.0 REFERENCES
D'AMOURS, I., 2010, Levé magnétique et spectrométrique aéroporté dans le secteur sud de LG4, Baie-James, Québec (DP 2010-03, MRN). D'AMOURS, I., 2010, Levé magnétique et spectrométrique aéroporté dans le secteur la haute Eastmain, Baie James, Québec (DP 2011-01, MRN). STORNOWAY DIAMOND CORPORATION, 2013, The Renard Diamond Project, Québec, Canada Feasibility Study Update - NI 43-101 Technical Report – 320p (SEDAR). THERIAULT, R. & BEAUSEJOUR, S., 2012, Geological map of Quebec (DV 2012-06, MRN). Website
http://sigeom.mrn.gouv.qc.ca (Sigeom database, MRN, Québec)
13.0 DELIVERABLES
One (1) paper copy of this report.
One (1) paper copy of the Diagnos Staked CARDS Kimberlite Targets (Figure 7) in a
1: 180 000 scale map, using the UTM NAD83 Zone 18N projection and oversize ANSI F
paper format.
CARDS Evaluation Report, South LG4-High Eastmain (Baie James) Kimberlite Project, Quebec
DIAGNOS Inc. 49 May 2016 (December 2016 Update)
14.0 CERTIFICATE OF QUALIFICATION Report Title: CARDS Evaluation Report, South LG4-High Eastmain (Baie James) Kimberlite
Project, Quebec.
I, Grigor Heba, residing in Brossard, Québec, Canada do hereby certify that:
1. I am a senior Geologist with the firm of DIAGNOS Inc. with an office at Suite 340,
7005, Taschereau Boulevard, Brossard, Québec, Canada.
2. I hold a B.Sc. in Geology (1990) from the Polytechnic University of Tirana (Albania),
a DEA in Sedimentary Geology, Geochemistry and Geophysics (1997) from the
Université des Sciences et Technologies de Lille (France) and a Ph.D. in Mineral
Resources (2008) from the Université du Québec à Montréal (UQAM), (Québec,
Canada).
3. I am the author of this report.
4. I am a member in good standing of l’Ordre des Géologues du Québec (#1464).
5. I have no direct or indirect interests in the mining claims owned by DIAGNOS Inc.,
nor in the securities of the company and have no interest in receiving such interest.
6. The current report is based on compilation of data originated from the Sigeom
database (MRN, Quebec) and from the Stornoway Diamond Corporation (NI 43-101-
Report, 2013), using Exploration Best Practices Guidelines.
7. The recommendations from this study are purely the result of mathematical
algorithms used on exploration and historical data and should only be considered as
such.