Acute Myocardial Infarction Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI ...
Cardiac MRI and Myocardial Infarction: the role of ......Cardiac MRI and Myocardial Infarction: the...
Transcript of Cardiac MRI and Myocardial Infarction: the role of ......Cardiac MRI and Myocardial Infarction: the...
Cardiac MRI and Myocardial Infarction: the role of Mathematical Modelling
Kenneth Mangion,
Clinical Research Fellow
Developments in Healthcare Imaging
Cambridge, 19/04/17
Body text
Acute
STEMI Angiography Primary PCI Stent
Velagaleti et al., Circulation 2008
Coronary
Occlusion
Body text
Target
identifiable
difference
Sample size
reduction by
CMR
EDV (ml/m2) 10 74%
ESV (ml/m2) 10 83%
SV (ml/m2) 10 84%
LVEF (%) 3 87%
Mass (g/m2) 10 90%
Grothues et al., 2004
Background: imaging biomarkers
Why use CMR?
Body text
Golden Jubilee National Hospital
BHF GCRC Maths & Stats
Body text
Cine
LVEF is an
indirect
measure of
contractility
Haemorrhage
occurs in a
subset
Infarct size
overestimated
MVO varies
dynamically
T2* mapping LGE
Occluded Circumflex
artery
Angio
Background: imaging biomarkers
Derived from multi parametric CMR
Dall’ Armelina et al., Circ. Cardiovasc. Imaging , 2011. Carrick et al., JACC Imaging, 2015
Requires eGFR
>30ml/min
14% STEMI
23% NSTEMI
have eGFR
A
B
LVEF
38%
LVEF
37.5%
LVEF
54.6%
LVEF
29.3%
6 months
post MI
Day 2
post MI
BHF- MRMI
STUDY
Infarct
36% LV
mass
Infarct
35% LV
mass
Background: imaging biomarkers
Case example
SofTMech
EPSRC Centre for Multiscale Soft Tissue Mechanics
Mathematical modelling
6 healthy volunteers 6 STEMI patients
Novel Biomarkers
Age: 52±9
EF: 66±3%
Age: 55±12
EF: 40±3%
Padmanabhan et al., 2010. Delles et al., 2010.
Need for personalised modelling
Case example
• Passive stiffness
• Contractility (Tref)
• Normalised Active
Tension (AT/SBP)
Healthy volunteer
STEMI patient
Need for personalised modelling
Image derived LV model
Healthy volunteer STEMI patient
Need for personalised modelling
4D LV models
Clinical data LV reconstruction
Strain estimation
Mesh generation
FEM simulation
Personalised
Parameters
Parameter
identification
optimisation
Model Personalisation
1 1.02 1.04 1.06 1.08 1.1 1.12 1.14 1.16 1.18 1.20
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50stress in fiber orientation
HV1 HV2 HV3
HV4
HV5
HV6
MI1
MI2
MI3
MI4
MI5
MI6
Amount of fiber stretch
Cauch
y S
tress
(kP
a)
Amount of fiber stretch
Wall
str
ess (
KP
a)
STEMI patients
Healthy volunteers
Results (1)
Passive stiffness
Healthy volunteers 64.8±8kPa
STEMI patients 69±7kPa
Ave
rag
e A
ctive
Te
nsio
n
(KP
a)
p=0.15
Results (2)
Active Tension
Healthy volunteers 0.44 ± 0.05
p<0.01
STEMI patients 0.57 ± 0.05
AT
/SB
P (
KP
a/m
mH
g)
Results (3)
Normalised Active Tension
• 1. Development of novel biomarkers
• 2. Validation against more
established markers (LVEF, infarct
size)
• 3. Clinically accessible!
Cardiac MRI and Myocardial Infarction
The Role of Mathematical Modelling
Thank you for your attention
http://www.glasgowheart.org
http://www.softmech.org