Cardiac Electrophysiology Laboratories: #52603 A Potential ......the VA healthcare system, using the...

1
Westyn Branch-Elliman, MD, MMSc 1,2,3 ; Maggie Stanislawski, MS 1,3 ; MD; Judith Strymish, MD 4,5 ; Howard S. Gold, MD 5,6 ; Kalpana Gupta MD, MPH 4,7 ; Preston Schneider, MD, MS 1,2 ; Anna Baron, PhD 2,3 , Paul Varosy, MD 1,2 , and P. Michael Ho, MD, PhD 1,2,3 Cardiac Electrophysiology Laboratories: A Potential Target for Antimicrobial Stewardship? Background Healthcare-associated infections are both common and costly, ranking among the top 10 causes of death in the US and costing an estimated $10 billion in direct medical costs per year. Infections complicate approximately 5% of cardiac device implantations, such as pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators, and cost greater than $50,000 per infection. Pre-Implantation antimicrobial prophylaxis can dramatically reduce the incidence of post-procedural infections, however, routine post-procedural antibiotic use is not proven to reduce infections, and may, in fact be harmful. Despite the lack of evidence, anecdotal reports suggest that post-procedural antibiotic use in the electrophysiology laboratory is common, and may be a potential target for antimicrobial stewardship programs. Objectives We sought to characterize antimicrobial utilization patterns following cardiac device infections within the VA healthcare system, using the VA Clinical Assessment Reporting and Tracking (CART) database. Methods All cardiac device implantations entered into the CART database and performed during the period from 10/1/2007-9/30/3013 were included. New antibiotic orders lasting for greater than 24 hours following device implantation were identified using VA administrative databases, and type and duration of antimicrobial therapy were characterized. Variation in practice patterns was evaluated by examining the incidence of post-procedural antimicrobial therapy at different medical centers, stratified by quartile of device procedural volume. 1 Eastern Colorado VA HCS (Denver, CO) 2 University of Colorado School of Medicine (Denver, CO), 3 Denver VA Center for Outcomes and Innovations (COIN) (Denver, CO), 4 VA Boston HCS (Boston, MA) 5 Harvard Medical School (Boston, MA), 6 Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (Boston, MA), 7 Boston University School of Medicine School of Medicine (Boston, MA) Contact: [email protected] Results N= 3,712 device implantations were identified at 34 VA Medical Centers. The mean age of participants was 72.0 (SD, 11.1 years); 98.4% of patients were male. 1211/3712 (32.6%) of implantations were performed on an ambulatory basis. Greater than 24 hours of post-procedural antimicrobial prophylaxis was prescribed following 1,579/3,712 (42.5%) of implantation procedures. The median duration of therapy was 5 days (Interquartile range, 5-7 days) (Figure 1). The most commonly prescribed antibiotic was cephalexin (1,152/1,579, 73%), followed by doxycycline (118/1,579, 7.5%), and ciprofloxacin (101/1,579, 6.4%). Vancomycin was used in 73/1579, 4.6%. Other antimicrobials were used infrequently. Routine post-procedural antibiotic use varied considerably by facility, with some institutions providing prolonged prophylaxis the majority of the time, and other facilities never offering routine post-procedural prophylaxis (Figure 2). Conclusions Prolonged post-procedural antibiotic prophylaxis is common following cardiac device implantation procedures, despite the lack of evidence supporting this practice. Practice patterns vary widely by specific facility and by procedural volume. There appears to be no defined standard of care regarding duration of antimicrobial prophylaxis in cardiac electrophysiology laboratories. Based on our findings, post-procedural antibiotic use may be an important target for antimicrobial stewardship programs that have primarily focused on inpatient and traditional surgical settings. #52603 0.00% 10.00% 20.00% 30.00% 40.00% 50.00% 60.00% 70.00% 80.00% 90.00% 100.00% 0 1 2 3 4 Rate of Prolonged Post-Procedural Antibiotic Use Quartile of Procedural Volume Figure 2. Unadjusted Post-Procedural Antibiotic Use Lasting Greater than 24 hours by Quartile of Procedural Volume, FY 2008-13 Quartile 1: 1-2 Procedures Quartile 2: 3-18 Procedures Quartile 3: 19-177 Procedures Quartile 4: 178-582 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 23 24 30 32 33 84 90 Proportion of Cases Days of Antimicrobial Therapy Figure 1. Duration of Prolonged Post-Procedural Antimicrobial Use Following Cardiac Device Implantation The median duration of post-procedural antimicrobial prophylaxis is 5 days. The most commonly prescribed agent is cephalexin. Research supported by: The Seattle-Denver Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care

Transcript of Cardiac Electrophysiology Laboratories: #52603 A Potential ......the VA healthcare system, using the...

Page 1: Cardiac Electrophysiology Laboratories: #52603 A Potential ......the VA healthcare system, using the VA Clinical Assessment Reporting and Tracking (CART) database. ... Research supported

Westyn Branch-Elliman, MD, MMSc1,2,3; Maggie Stanislawski, MS1,3; MD; Judith Strymish, MD4,5; Howard S. Gold, MD5,6; Kalpana

Gupta MD, MPH4,7; Preston Schneider, MD, MS1,2; Anna Baron, PhD2,3, Paul Varosy, MD1,2, and P. Michael Ho, MD, PhD1,2,3

Cardiac Electrophysiology Laboratories:

A Potential Target for Antimicrobial Stewardship?

Background

Healthcare-associated infections are both common and costly, ranking among the top 10 causes

of death in the US and costing an estimated $10 billion in direct medical costs per year.

Infections complicate approximately 5% of cardiac device implantations, such as pacemakers and

implantable cardioverter-defibrillators, and cost greater than $50,000 per infection. Pre-Implantation antimicrobial prophylaxis can dramatically reduce the incidence of post-procedural

infections, however, routine post-procedural antibiotic use is not proven to reduce infections, and may,

in fact be harmful.

Despite the lack of evidence, anecdotal reports suggest that post-procedural antibiotic use in the

electrophysiology laboratory is common, and may be a potential target for antimicrobial stewardship

programs.

Objectives We sought to characterize antimicrobial utilization patterns following cardiac device infections within

the VA healthcare system, using the VA Clinical Assessment Reporting and Tracking (CART) database.

Methods

All cardiac device implantations entered into the CART database and performed during the period

from 10/1/2007-9/30/3013 were included.

New antibiotic orders lasting for greater than 24 hours following device implantation were identified

using VA administrative databases, and type and duration of antimicrobial therapy were characterized.

Variation in practice patterns was evaluated by examining the incidence of post-procedural

antimicrobial therapy at different medical centers, stratified by quartile of device procedural volume.

1Eastern Colorado VA HCS (Denver, CO) 2University of Colorado School of Medicine (Denver, CO), 3Denver VA Center for Outcomes and Innovations (COIN) (Denver, CO), 4VA Boston

HCS (Boston, MA) 5Harvard Medical School (Boston, MA), 6Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (Boston, MA), 7Boston University School of Medicine School of Medicine (Boston, MA)

Contact: [email protected]

Results

N= 3,712 device implantations were identified at 34 VA Medical Centers. The mean age of participants was

72.0 (SD, 11.1 years); 98.4% of patients were male. 1211/3712 (32.6%) of implantations were performed on an

ambulatory basis.

Greater than 24 hours of post-procedural antimicrobial prophylaxis was prescribed following 1,579/3,712

(42.5%) of implantation procedures.

The median duration of therapy was 5 days (Interquartile range, 5-7 days) (Figure 1).

The most commonly prescribed antibiotic was cephalexin (1,152/1,579, 73%), followed by doxycycline

(118/1,579, 7.5%), and ciprofloxacin (101/1,579, 6.4%). Vancomycin was used in 73/1579, 4.6%. Other

antimicrobials were used infrequently.

Routine post-procedural antibiotic use varied considerably by facility, with some institutions providing

prolonged prophylaxis the majority of the time, and other facilities never offering routine post-procedural

prophylaxis (Figure 2).

Conclusions Prolonged post-procedural antibiotic prophylaxis is common following cardiac device implantation procedures,

despite the lack of evidence supporting this practice.

Practice patterns vary widely by specific facility and by procedural volume. There appears to be no defined

standard of care regarding duration of antimicrobial prophylaxis in cardiac electrophysiology laboratories.

Based on our findings, post-procedural antibiotic use may be an important target for antimicrobial stewardship

programs that have primarily focused on inpatient and traditional surgical settings.

#52603

0.00%

10.00%

20.00%

30.00%

40.00%

50.00%

60.00%

70.00%

80.00%

90.00%

100.00%

0 1 2 3 4

Rate

of

Pro

lon

ged

Po

st-

Pro

ced

ura

l A

nti

bio

tic U

se

Quartile of Procedural Volume

Figure 2. Unadjusted Post-Procedural Antibiotic Use Lasting Greater than 24 hours by Quartile of Procedural Volume, FY 2008-13

Quartile 1:

1-2

Procedures

Quartile 2:

3-18

Procedures

Quartile 3:

19-177

Procedures

Quartile 4:

178-582

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 23 24 30 32 33 84 90

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f C

ases

Days of Antimicrobial Therapy

Figure 1. Duration of Prolonged Post-Procedural Antimicrobial Use Following Cardiac Device Implantation

The median duration of post-procedural

antimicrobial prophylaxis is 5 days.

The most commonly prescribed agent

is cephalexin.

Research supported by: The Seattle-Denver Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care