Parish Office: 713-921-1261 Religious Education: 713-921-1226
CARBON DIOXIDE CAPTURE AND BENEFICIAL REUSE...2018/12/14 · GreenhouseGasControl,2011:pp911-921. 6...
Transcript of CARBON DIOXIDE CAPTURE AND BENEFICIAL REUSE...2018/12/14 · GreenhouseGasControl,2011:pp911-921. 6...
© 2016 CO2 Solutions Inc. and CO2 Solution Technologies Inc.
All Rights Reserved.
CARBON DIOXIDE CAPTURE AND BENEFICIAL REUSELouis Fradette, Sylvain Lefebvre, Jonathan Carley
October 14, 2016
2
Forward Looking Statements
All statements in this presentation that are other than statements of historical facts are forward-lookingstatements which contain our current expectations about our future results. Forward-looking statementsinvolve numerous risks and uncertainties. We have attempted to identify any forward-looking statements byusing words such as “anticipates”, “believes”, “could”, “expects”, “intends”, “may”, “should” and othersimilar expressions.
Although we believe that the expectations reflected in all of our forward-looking statements are reasonable,we can give no assurance that such expectations will prove to be correct. A number of factors may affect ourfuture results and may cause those results to differ materially from those indicated in any forward-lookingstatements made by us or on our behalf. Such factors include our early stage of technology development;our need for capital to finance necessary research and product development; our ability to attract and retainkey employees and strategic partners; our ability to achieve and maintain profitability; fluctuations in thetrading price and volume of our stock; competition from other providers of similar products and services;and other unanticipated future events and conditions. For further information concerning risks anduncertainties that may affect our future results, please review the disclosures as may be contained fromtime to time in our filings with SEDAR. Other than as required by applicable securities laws, we undertake noobligation to publicly update or revise any of our forward-looking statements, whether as a result ofchanged circumstances, new information, future events, or for any other reason occurring after the date ofthis presentation. This presentation does not constitute an offer to sell or solicitation of an offer to buy
securities in any jurisdiction.
3
« State-of-the-art »: Boundary Dam
SaskPower Admits to
Problems at First “Full-Scale”
Carbon Capture Project at
Boundary Dam Plant
- Power Magazine, Nov 30 2015
4
Existing, Conventional Solutions
• High costs• High operating costs due to steam-fed
regeneration requirement
• $60-90/tonne of CO2 for flue gas application(1,2)
• Operational and environmental
problems(5)
• Degradation and stability issues
• Extensive flue gas pre-treatment required
• Toxic aerosol emissions
• Solvent losses
• Generation of waste products
Sources:
1) http://ccemc.ca/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/C101033-HTC-DEV-JA-03-001-1-R1-+-FEED-REPORT-CCEMC.pdf, Page 19 (~$70/tonne cost)
2) https://www.netl.doe.gov/File%20Library/Events/2014/2014%20NETL%20CO2%20Capture/A-Bhown-EPRI-CO2-Capture-RD-EPRI.pdf, Page 6
3) http://www.ai-ees.ca/media/10958/2010_barriers_to_co2_eor_report_final_june4-13.pdf, Page 44
4) http://www.energy.gov.ab.ca/Org/pdfs/CCS_Implementation.pdf, Page 10
5) http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1750583614001777
5
Life Cycle Analysis - MEA
5
Impact % Change vs
no capture
Global warming −74
Terrestrial acidification -13
Freshwater eutrophication 136
Marine eutrophication 43
Photochemical oxidant formation 27
Participate matter formation -7
Human toxicity 51
Terrestrial ecotoxicity 114
Fresh water ecotoxicity 205
Marine ecotoxicity 88
Running CO2 capture with MEA (or any amine) is detrimental to the planet
- 1.6 kg of MEA consumed/ton of CO2 captured
Singh, B., A. H. Strømman, et E. G. Hertwich. «Comparative life cycle environmental assessment of CCS technologies.» International Journal of
Greenhouse Gas Control, 2011: pp911-921.
6
Typical Amine Capture Process
• High-temperature stripping (>120ᵒC) requires use of high-grade steam
7
CO2 Solutions’ Process – An ‘Industrial Lung’
LOW-GRADE
HEAT FOR
REGENERATION
ENERGY
LOW COST, NON-
TOXIC CARBONATE
SOLVENT
STANDARD GAS
TREATMENT
EQUIPMENT
8
CO2 Solutions’ Process – An ‘Industrial Lung’
NO
AEROSOLS
NO
TOXIC
WASTES
No waterwash No filter
No reclaimer
No solvent
makeup
9
2015: EERC Pilot Testing Program
• Three full weeks of testing in December 2014 and January 2015
• Packed column absorber and stripper• Stripper operated under partial vacuum
• Heat source was hot water from domestic water heaters• Steam never used
• Natural gas and coal flue gases
• Solvents: Neat K2CO3 and Formulated Carbonate
• Proprietary CO2 Solutions 1T1 enzyme• Free and immobilized
10
2015: CO2 Capture <$40/tonne was Realistic
• Pilot testing at EERC
demonstrated:• Efficient use of nil-value power plant heat in
the 70-90°C range for solvent regeneration
• Electrical parasitic load of 0.2 GJ/tonne for
reduced pressure
• Change of Paradigm• Majority of the stripping heat from outside of
the steam cycle in power plants• First proof of feasibility
• Cost of capture incl. compression
<$40/tonne
11
2015: Techno-Economics Results – EERC
• Net power plant efficiency
-3.5-3.5
-10.9
DOE Case 11 DOE Case 12 CO2 Solutions
12
2015: Techno-Economics Results – EERC (2)
• Comparison at 550 MW Net Power output
• Capture and compression to 2250 psi
DOE Case 11 CO2
Solutions
No Capture Capture
Gross Turbine Power, MW 580 637
Cost of Electricity, $/MWh $ 58.91 $ 82.31
Levelized Cost of Electricity, $/MWh $ 74.47 $ 104.38
CO2 Capture Cost, $/tonne - $ 39.30
DOE 2025 goal is met at <40$
13
2015: Techno-Economics Results – EERC (3)
• Impact of low grade heat
• Low grade heat reuse leads to• Significantly less CO2 to capture and to sequester
• Smaller power plant
• Smaller capture unit
Extra Fuel relative to Case 11 - +38.2% +9.7%
CO2 Generated (Mt/y) 4.2 5.89 4.67
CO2 Captured (Mt/y) - 5.30 4.20
CO2 to atmosphere (Mt/y) 4.2 0.59 0.47
DOE Case 11 DOE Case 12CO
Solutions
CO2
Solutions
$
14
2015: Techno-Economics Results – EERC (3)
• Impact of low grade heat
• Low grade heat reuse leads to• Significantly less CO2 to capture and to sequester
• Smaller power plant
• Smaller capture unit
Extra Fuel relative to Case 11 - +38.2% +9.7%
CO2 Generated (Mt/y) 4.2 5.89 4.67
CO2 Captured (Mt/y) - 5.30 4.20
CO2 to atmosphere (Mt/y) 4.2 0.59 0.47
DOE Case 11 DOE Case 12CO
Solutions
CO2
Solutions
Impacts
15
10 t/d Demonstration - Results
• 5 times less enzyme than the design basis
• CO2 produced is at 99.95%+ purity
• No solvent degradation observed
• No solvent makeup required
• No toxic waste products generated• Solvent sent to the municipal sewer
• Operation with day shift operators only• Stable process
• Mass and energy balances validated by 3rd party (Tetratech Inc.)
16
• Electrical consumption of main components
extrapolated from pilot operation
• Reboiler heat (hot water): 3.2 to 3.6 GJ/tonne
Consumption
(GJ/t)
Vacuum (0.3 to 2 bara) 0.24
Flue gas blower 0.05
Lean/Rich solvent pumps 0.06
Total 0.35
10 t/d Demonstration - Results (2)
17
CO2 Capture <$40/tonne is Even More Realistic
• Base case• Full-size OTSG unit (for in-situ oil production)
• Natural gas combustion
• 1250 tonnes CO2/day
• 116 M$ Capital investment
• Performance data validated by Tetratech Inc.
• Cost of capture (before compression)
($/t CO2)
Fixed Costs 6.9
Variable costs 12.6
Total Capital Req. 8.5
Total 28.0
18
LCA – Amines vs Carbonates
CO2 Solutions’ process
• No extra power required vs others => improvements in Energy-related impacts
• Chemistry similar to carbonates => retains excellent chemistry performance
Energy
demand
Solvent
chemistry
Grant, T., C. Anderson, B. Hooper. « Comparative life cycle assessment of potassium carbonate and mono-ethanolamine solvents for CO2 captured from post
combustion flue gases », International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2014: V28, pp35–44.
19
Next: Commercial Progress – Capture and Reuse
<2014
Lab and
Bench-Scale:
0.5tpd
2014-2015
Pilot:
1tpd
2015
Demonstration:
10tpd
2016+
Commercial:
10-300tpd; $37M
CAPEX in Canadatpd = metric tonnes CO2 captured per day
30 tpd project, 7.4 M$:- 2.4 M$ from SDTC
- 3.0 M$ from Technoclimat
(granted)
300 tpd, 30 M$- 15 M$ from CCEMC
(granted)
…
30 tpd project, 7.4 M$:- 2.4 M$ from SDTC
- 3.0 M$ from Technoclimat
(granted)
300 tpd, 30 M$- 15 M$ from CCEMC
(granted)
…
20
CO2 Capture
3-30%
99%+
Renewable, Value-
Added Products
Next: Capture and CO2 Reuse Processes
“Valorisation Carbone Québec”
CO2 Conversion/Reuse
Partners
Industry
• $15M from Government of Quebec for development and demonstration
21
Valorisation Carbone Québec
• GoQ objective• Demonstrate feasibility of combining renewable power with CO2 capture to
reduce emissions and create value
• Montreal East retained location
• 70 conversion technologies identified• Most advanced processes spotted
• Polymers
• Chemicals
• Food (proteins)
• Ranking of candidates• LCA
• Cost of conversion
• Market size
• Potential for creating « mass cycles »
21
22
Robust Patent Portfolio
46 ISSUED
BROAD PATENT PORTFOLIO FOR USE OF
CARBONIC ANHYDRASE IN CANADA, U.S., EU,
CHINA, AUSTRALIA AND OTHER MARKETS
37 PENDING*
vs. 13 and 19 respectively in 2008
*as at June 30, 2015
Areas of Carbonic
AnhydraseCO2 Capture Application
SOLVENTSAmines
Carbonates
Amino Acids
Combinations
PROCESSESPacked Tower
Spray Scrubber
Bubble Column
Universal
INDUSTRIAL SECTORSPower
Steam
‘Drop-in’ Applications
ENZYME UTILIZATIONSoluble
Particle-Based
Analogs
23
Summary
• Process performance confirmed• Enzyme stable in process
• No toxic waste generation
• No aerosol issues
• No solvent degradation
• Solvent
• Can be eliminated in standard water treatment plant
• Can be converted into fertilizers when spent
• Capture cost confirmed at the 10 tpd scale• <40$/tonne compressed to 2250 psi
• Commercialization on its way• 30 tpd project
• >100 tpd project
• Carbon cycle project
© 2016 CO2 Solutions Inc. and CO2 Solution Technologies Inc.
All Rights Reserved.
THANK YOUDr. Louis Fradette,
Sr. VP Process Engineering & CTO
[email protected]; 418-842-3456
www.co2solutions.com