CARB Aftertreatment Review 06 06 07 Final Editied … · • Logistics/handling challenges: ......

25
CARB aftertreatment review July 11, 2007 1 GE Transportation Aftertreatment Impact to locomotives & locomotive operations California Air Resources Board Sacramento, CA June 6 th , 2007

Transcript of CARB Aftertreatment Review 06 06 07 Final Editied … · • Logistics/handling challenges: ......

CARB aftertreatment reviewJuly 11, 2007

1

GETransportation

Aftertreatment Impact to locomotives & locomotive operations

California Air Resources BoardSacramento, CA

June 6th, 2007

CARB aftertreatment reviewJuly 11, 2007

2

Discussion topicsWhere we are & where are we goingWhere we are & where are we going

Tier 4 PM Tier 4 PM

Tier 4 NOxTier 4 NOx

Space & other constraintsSpace & other constraints

Operational impact Operational impact

Development requirementsDevelopment requirements

Summary Summary

CARB aftertreatment reviewJuly 11, 2007

3

Discussion topicsWhere we are & where are we goingWhere we are & where are we going

Tier 4 PM Tier 4 PM Tier 4 PM

Tier 4 NOxTier 4 NOxTier 4 NOx

Space & other constraintsSpace & other constraintsSpace & other constraints

Operational impact Operational impact Operational impact

Development requirements Development requirements Development requirements

Summary Summary Summary

CARB aftertreatment reviewJuly 11, 2007

4

Where we have come from

0.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8

EPA Line-haul PM (g/hp-hr)

EPA

Lin

e-ha

ul N

Ox

(g/h

p-hr

)

Unregulated

Tier 0 (1973-2001)

Tier 1 (2002-2004)

Tier 2 (2005+)

-25%

-22%

-26%

-55%

CARB aftertreatment reviewJuly 11, 2007

5

Tier 3 - ‘12

-50%Tier Technology3 - On-engine technologies

- Ultra low sulfur diesel

Where we are going

1.0

0.1 0.2

Tier 2

EPA Line-haul PM (g/hp-hr)

EPA

Lin

e-ha

ul N

Ox

(g/h

p-hr

)

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0 Tier 4 – ‘15

-70%

4 - All Tier 3 technology- Diesel particulate filter

(DPF)- Ultra low sulfur diesel

Tier 4 – ‘17

-76%

4 - All Tier 4 PM technology- NOx aftertreatment(Urea SCR)

- Ultra low sulfur diesel

CARB aftertreatment reviewJuly 11, 2007

6

Discussion topicsWhere we are & where are we goingWhere we are & where are we goingWhere we are & where are we going

Tier 4 PM Tier 4 PM

Tier 4 NOxTier 4 NOxTier 4 NOx

Space & other constraintsSpace & other constraintsSpace & other constraints

Operational impact Operational impact Operational impact

Development requirementsDevelopment requirementsDevelopment requirements

Summary Summary Summary

CARB aftertreatment reviewJuly 11, 2007

7

Diesel Particulate Filter • Captures all forms of particulate

matter

• 90+% PM reductions are achievable

• Captured material must be periodically burned off (regenerated)

– Avoid high back pressure– SFC penalty

• Technology path defined

• Significant engineering challenge

• Logistics/handling challenges:– Size/weight/handling equipment– May require crane for change out

0

20

40

60

80

100

Organics (SOF)

Sulfates

Soot (DPM)

Fuel

Lube

Metals& Ash

DPF

Rep

rese

ntat

ive

% o

f Tot

al

CARB aftertreatment reviewJuly 11, 2007

8

PM Aftertreatment ConcernsConsumables:• 1 to 2 % SFC increase . . . 35 – 70 tons/year of CO2

– added backpressure– regeneration energy

Maintenance:• Ash cleaning every 180 days a must to match service intervals

– Similar to power cylinder replacement (will require crane)– UX exchange process– Waste handling & disposal

Durability:• Anticipate replacement of DPF at end of useful life (engine overhaul)

Logistics:• DPF maintenance, handling & exchange process• Waste disposal

CARB aftertreatment reviewJuly 11, 2007

9

Discussion topics

Where we are & where are we goingWhere we are & where are we goingWhere we are & where are we going

Tier 4 PMTier 4 PMTier 4 PM

Tier 4 NOxTier 4 NOx

Space & other constraintsSpace & other constraintsSpace & other constraints

Operational impact Operational impact Operational impact

Development requirementsDevelopment requirementsDevelopment requirements

Summary Summary Summary

CARB aftertreatment reviewJuly 11, 2007

10

Tier 4 NOx: Areas of Concern

• No account for carbon, ammonia slip, fuel consumption and practical/safety implications

• Catalyst deterioration poorly known for zeolite,real exhaust, and loco environment

• References to truck “successes” are unproven in durability and degradation

• Marine/Loco proposals are not consistent

CARB aftertreatment reviewJuly 11, 2007

11

Assessment Process

1. System Concept 3. Monte Carlo Analysis2. Analytical Model

Technical Basis:• Tier 2 engine-out NOx at 5.5g/hp-hr into SCR system• Urea SCR only using a zeolite catalyst• Locomotive exhaust temperature and duty cycle

PerformanceFr

eque

ncy

CARB aftertreatment reviewJuly 11, 2007

12

Urea-SCR: Nominal System Configuration

Three-Catalyst System:

DOCNONO2

NONO2

SCR

urea

NH3Slip

NH3

N2 N2

16.5 cu. ft47,000 hr-1

4.9 cu. Ft.(JM design)

3 cu.ft.260,000 hr-1

Conversion %Ideal Conversion Conversion %

• 1.3g/bhp-hr requires 76% duty cycle NOx conversion at end of useful life

• Need ~85% peak conversion after degradation

NoxSensorFeedback

– DOC design provides optimum NO/NO2 ratio when new– Slip catalyst converts NH3 to N2 , with some NOx & NH3

CARB aftertreatment reviewJuly 11, 2007

13

Deterioration - DOC

DOC will require replacement in <6 months

Effect on SCR Performance:

CARB aftertreatment reviewJuly 11, 2007

14

“SCR catalysts that are engine aged with urea, deactivate in a more complicated manner than hydrothermal aging alone.” inlet outletSCR

Deterioration - SCR

Ref. SAE 07PFL-397 in press 2007

CARB aftertreatment reviewJuly 11, 2007

15

Notch by notch dosing adjustment

Deterioration – Ammonia Slip Catalyst

At 1.3 g/hp-hr, ammonia slip will be above the odor threshold

Ref. BASF, SAE 2006-01-0640

• Deactivation of slip catalyst from 90% 80% ammonia conversion• Assume selectivity to nitrogen remains at 80% (zero degradation)• Inlet NOx for locomotive > trucks higher ammonia slip levels• Transient ammonia slip > 50 ppm possible due to large catalyst mass• Potential to form N2O due to NH3 slip catalyst degradation• Closed loop sensor needed – technology not available today

CARB aftertreatment reviewJuly 11, 2007

16

Comparison of Loco and Trucks• Exhaust temperature in a locomotive is higher than in a

truck

• Trucks use V-based catalyst, not applicable to locomotives in US . . . Locomotives require Zeolite catalyst – not commercially available

• 120,000 miles on a truck is approximate 8 months of locomotive operation

• Ammonia slip concerns for locos– Continuous ammonia slip due to high dosing– Transient ammonia slip > 50 ppm possible due to large

catalyst mass

CARB aftertreatment reviewJuly 11, 2007

17

SCR Limitations• Rate Limited (temperature)

• Mass Transfer Limited (catalyst size)

• NH3 Limited (dosing accuracy & maldistribution)

• Thermal Aging / Poisoning (loss of sites)

CARB aftertreatment reviewJuly 11, 2007

18

• New catalyst entitlement –consensus

• Larger impact of system interactions and variation

• High risk technology breakthroughs needed to get to <2.0 gm/HP-hr

Summary Assessment of Tier 4 NOx

• Concern for ammonia slip• Full probabilistic analysis of variation

• Deterioration of catalysts • ASC reconversion of NOx

ASC conversion

Zeolite catalyst

SCR variation

NOx Sensor accuracy

NOx Sensor variation

ASC Selectivity

SCR degradation

DOC catalyst replace

Advances required

CARB aftertreatment reviewJuly 11, 2007

19

Discussion topics

Where we are & where are we goingWhere we are & where are we goingWhere we are & where are we going

Tier 4 PM Tier 4 PM Tier 4 PM

Tier 4 NOxTier 4 NOxTier 4 NOx

Space & other constraintsSpace & other constraints

Operational impact Operational impact Operational impact

Development requirementsDevelopment requirementsDevelopment requirements

Summary Summary Summary

CARB aftertreatment reviewJuly 11, 2007

20

General Aftertreatment ConstraintsSensitive to Exhaust Temperature:• Low temperature and low power/idle operation

affects efficiency & soot loading• High temperature, high altitude, tunnel operation

affect durabilityPackaging/Weight:• Must mount above engine, limits device size and

plumbing for reductant mixing• High weight, will need significant structural

support• Impact to locomotive overall weight and balance

Mechanical Environment:• Large housing, response to operating

frequencies & thermal stress

• Shock loads due to hard couples, effect on substrate durability

SCR DPF

Plus, reductant handling system and storage

Plate “L”

CARB aftertreatment reviewJuly 11, 2007

21

Discussion topics

Where we are & where are we goingWhere we are & where are we goingWhere we are & where are we going

Tier 4 PM Tier 4 PM Tier 4 PM

Tier 4 NOxTier 4 NOxTier 4 NOx

Space & other constraintsSpace & other constraintsSpace & other constraints

Operational impact Operational impact

Development requirementsDevelopment requirementsDevelopment requirements

Summary Summary Summary

CARB aftertreatment reviewJuly 11, 2007

22

Fuel impact . . . new builds

Tier 3 2015 2017

6+%*

1-2 %

2017

2017

* Includes fuel loss from the reduction in catalyst efficiency

Each point of fuel efficiency loss drives:• An additional 3,500 gallons of fuel burned/year• An additional 35 tons of CO2 exhausted/year• For every new locomotiveAssumes average locomotive fuel burn of 350k gallons/year

CARB aftertreatment reviewJuly 11, 2007

23

Discussion topics

Where we are & where are we goingWhere we are & where are we goingWhere we are & where are we going

Tier 4 PM Tier 4 PM Tier 4 PM

Tier 4 NOxTier 4 NOxTier 4 NOx

Space & other constraintsSpace & other constraintsSpace & other constraints

Operational impact Operational impact Operational impact

Development requirements Development requirements

Summary Summary Summary

CARB aftertreatment reviewJuly 11, 2007

24

Tier 4 development timeline

Production launch

Rules promulgated

Concept development

Finalized concept

Detailed design

Lab test model Prototypes

Field demonstration

Based on successful Evolution launch . . .

Already feeling schedule pressure

Tier 4 PM

Tier 4 NOx

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

‘15‘14‘13‘12‘11‘10‘08 ‘09‘07

Production launch

Rules promulgated

Concept development

Finalized concept

Detailed design

Lab test model Prototypes

Field demonstration

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

‘15‘14‘13‘12‘11‘10‘08 ‘09‘07 ‘16 ‘17

R&D

CARB aftertreatment reviewJuly 11, 2007

25

Discussion topics

Where we are & where are we goingWhere we are & where are we goingWhere we are & where are we going

Tier 4 PM Tier 4 PM Tier 4 PM

Tier 4 NOxTier 4 NOxTier 4 NOx

Space & other constraintsSpace & other constraintsSpace & other constraints

Operational impact Operational impact Operational impact

Development requirementsDevelopment requirementsDevelopment requirements

Summary Summary