Capital Requirements for Financial Holding Companies in Taiwan Tsai-Ching Lai & Min-Teh Yu Jin-Wen...
-
Upload
amelia-perry -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
1
Transcript of Capital Requirements for Financial Holding Companies in Taiwan Tsai-Ching Lai & Min-Teh Yu Jin-Wen...
Capital Requirements forCapital Requirements forFinancial Holding Financial Holding
Companies in TaiwanCompanies in Taiwan
Tsai-Ching Lai & Min-Teh YuTsai-Ching Lai & Min-Teh Yu
Jin-Wen Institute & Taiwan Insurance Jin-Wen Institute & Taiwan Insurance InstituteInstitute
Providence UniversityProvidence University
◆ In 2001, the FHC Act was passed.
◆ 14 FHCs in Taiwan, a total of 802 b in BV as of 2003.
(IUS$=32NT$)
Introduction
Company Company NameName
Hua-Hua-NanNan FubonFubon CathayCathay China China
DevelopmentDevelopment E.SunE.Sun FuhwaFuhwa MegaMega
FoundingFounding DateDate 12/19/0112/19/01 12/19/0112/19/01 12/31/0112/31/01 12/28/0112/28/01 01/28/0201/28/02 02/04/0202/04/02 02/04/0202/04/02
CapitalCapital(billion NT$)(billion NT$) 5656 8181 8585 118118 2929 3030 114114
Company Company NameName TaishinTaishin Shin Shin
KongKong WaterlandWaterland SinopacSinopac China China TrustTrust FirstFirst Jih SunJih Sun
FoundingFounding DateDate 02/18/0202/18/02 02/19/0202/19/02 03/26/0203/26/02 05/09/0205/09/02 05/17/0205/17/02 01/02/0301/02/03 02/05/0202/05/02
CapitalCapital(billion NT$)(billion NT$) 4848 3232 2121 4040 6060 5555 2323
◆ Current Capital Adequacy Requirements: (IUS$=32NT$)
Stand-alone basis rather than the combined basis.
> Banking - 10 billion NT
> Securities - 1 billion NT
> Non-life insurance - 2 billion NT
> Life insurance - 2 billion NT
> FHC - 20 billion NT
◆ A simple attempt to measure the risk capital for FHC
and its Subs using VaR method.
*Risk Capital = Capital-at-Risk = Value-at-Risk
VaR = the quantity of capital required to ensure, with a given CL, that the
enterprise does not become insolvent.
*A FHC in Taiwan must be a pure holding company
◆ Determine the asset allocations of FHC for it subs.
Allocation methods: Equal-weight, Regulatory, Mean-Variance, Mean-VaREqual-weight, Regulatory, Mean-Variance, Mean-VaR
◆ Index portfolio proxies for each sub
Table 1
Data and Estimates
01/01/1997 -12/31/ 2001
Industry Daily Index and Average
FHC FHC SubsidiariesSubsidiaries
Mean of equity Mean of equity daily return daily return
(%)(%)
StdDev of StdDev of equitydaily equitydaily return (%)return (%)
Mean of Mean of equity valueequity value(billion NT$)(billion NT$)
StdDev of StdDev of equity valueequity value(billion NT$)(billion NT$)
BankingBanking 0.83250.8325 0.05940.0594 473,502473,502 151,305151,305
SecuritiesSecurities 0.53870.5387 0.08380.0838 194,898194,898 36,56636,566
Non-lifeNon-life 0.43720.4372 0.06080.0608 65,99765,997 11,54111,541
LifeLife 0.32890.3289 0.05530.0553 402,786402,786 69,24469,244
Data
FHC FHC SubsidiariesSubsidiaries BankingBanking SecuritiesSecurities Non-lifeNon-life LifeLife
BankingBanking 1.00001.0000 -0.0213-0.0213 0.02610.0261 -0.0165-0.0165
SecuritiesSecurities -0.0213-0.0213 1.00001.0000 0.01650.0165 0.00180.0018
Non-lifeNon-life 0.02610.0261 0.01650.0165 1.00001.0000 0.01370.0137
LifeLife -0.0165-0.0165 0.00180.0018 0.01370.0137 1.00001.0000
Table 2
Correlation Matrix for 4 Subsidiary Indexes
Table 3
Asset Allocations of FHC
FHCFHCSubsidiariesSubsidiaries
Equal-weightEqual-weight AllocationAllocation
Regulatory Regulatory AllocationAllocation
Mean-Variance Mean-Variance AllocationAllocation
Mean-VaR Mean-VaR AllocationAllocation
Banking Banking 25% 66.67% 35.46% 37.57%
SecuritiesSecurities 25% 6.67% 26.67% 35.48%
Non-lifeNon-life 25% 13.33% 19.44% 14.02%
LifeLife 25% 13.33% 18.43% 12.93%
(A) Banking subsidiary – Historical Simulation VaR
(B) Securities subsidiary – Historical Simulation VaR
(C) Non-life subsidiary – Historical Simulation VaR
(D) Life insurance subsidiary – Historical Simulation VaR
(E) FHC – Historical Simulation VaR
Table 4
Capital-at-Risk
Pure Risk AnalysisFHCFHC
SubsidiariesSubsidiariesEqual-weight Equal-weight
AllocationAllocationRegulatory Regulatory
AllocationAllocation
(1) Banking(1) Banking 5.35545.3554 13.846113.8461
(2) Securities(2) Securities 6.81436.8143 1.67341.6734
(3) Non-life (3) Non-life 6.59966.5996 3.31563.3156
(4) Life(4) Life 5.91545.9154 2.75122.7512
(5) Risk Capital of All Subsidiaries(5) Risk Capital of All Subsidiaries(5) = (1)+(2)+(3)+(4)(5) = (1)+(2)+(3)+(4) 24.684724.6847 21.586321.5863
(6) Risk Capital of the FHC(6) Risk Capital of the FHC 11.839711.8397 15.760415.7604
(7) Diversified Risk Capital = (5) – (6)(7) Diversified Risk Capital = (5) – (6) 12.845012.8450 5.82595.8259
(8) Index of Diversification Effect=(7)/(5)(%)(8) Index of Diversification Effect=(7)/(5)(%) 52.0452.04 26.9926.99
(9) Expected Return of the FHC(%)(9) Expected Return of the FHC(%) 0.53430.5343 0.69310.6931
(10) Index of Allocation Effect=(9)/(6)(%)(10) Index of Allocation Effect=(9)/(6)(%) 4.514.51 4.404.40
( Unit: Standard Unit)
Table 5
Capital-at-Risk
Risk and Return AnalysisFHCFHC
SubsidiariesSubsidiariesMean-VarianceMean-Variance
AllocationAllocationMean-VaR Mean-VaR AllocationAllocation
(1) Banking(1) Banking 6.78236.7823 8.43718.4371
(2) Securities(2) Securities 6.89726.8972 7.48937.4893
(3) Non-life (3) Non-life 6.25186.2518 6.89436.8943
(4) Life(4) Life 6.46216.4621 6.67366.6736
(5) Risk Capital of All Subsidiaries(5) Risk Capital of All Subsidiaries(5) = (1)+(2)+(3)+(4)(5) = (1)+(2)+(3)+(4) 26.393426.3934 29.494329.4943
(6) Risk Capital of the FHC(6) Risk Capital of the FHC 12.573912.5739 11.842611.8426
(7) Diversified Risk Capital = (5) – (6)(7) Diversified Risk Capital = (5) – (6) 13.819513.8195 17.651717.6517
(8) Index of Diversification Effect=(7)/(5)(%)(8) Index of Diversification Effect=(7)/(5)(%) 52.3652.36 59.8559.85
(9) Expected Return of the FHC(%)(9) Expected Return of the FHC(%) 0.69310.6931 0.69310.6931
(10) Index of Allocation Effect=(9)/(6)(%)(10) Index of Allocation Effect=(9)/(6)(%) 5.515.51 5.855.85
( Unit: Standard Unit)
Conclusion
1. Risk Capital of FHC: MVaR < MV < Reg
- MVaR is Lowest subject to the same risk / CL
2. Diversification Effect: MVaR > MV > EW > Reg
- More effective for MVaR than Reg
3. Risk/Return Efficiency: MVaR > MV > EW > Reg
- Efficient use of capital
4. Capital Requirements:
- Combined basis at FHC > Stand-Alone at Subs
5. Rooms for Reg to changes towards MVaR & MV