Capital budgeting i

28
1 Outline 1 Why Use Net Present Value? 2 The Payback Period Rule 3 The Discounted Payback Period Rule 4 The Average Accounting Return 5 The Internal Rate of Return 6 Problems with the IRR Approach 7 The Profitability Index 8 The Practice of Capital Budgeting 9 Summary and Conclusions

Transcript of Capital budgeting i

Page 1: Capital budgeting i

1

Outline

1 Why Use Net Present Value?2 The Payback Period Rule3 The Discounted Payback Period Rule4 The Average Accounting Return5 The Internal Rate of Return6 Problems with the IRR Approach7 The Profitability Index8 The Practice of Capital Budgeting9 Summary and Conclusions

Page 2: Capital budgeting i

2

Why Use Net Present Value?

Accepting positive NPV projects benefits shareholders.

NPV uses cash flows NPV uses all the cash flows of the project NPV discounts the cash flows properly

Page 3: Capital budgeting i

3

The Net Present Value (NPV) Rule Net Present Value (NPV) =

Total PV of future CF’s - Initial Investment

Estimating NPV: 1. Estimate future cash flows: how much? and when? 2. Estimate discount rate 3. Estimate initial costs

Minimum Acceptance Criteria: Accept if NPV > 0 Ranking Criteria: Choose the highest NPV

Page 4: Capital budgeting i

4

Good Attributes of the NPV Rule

1. Uses cash flows 2. Uses ALL cash flows of the project 3. Discounts ALL cash flows properly

Reinvestment assumption: the NPV rule assumes that all cash flows can be reinvested at the discount rate.

Page 5: Capital budgeting i

5

The Payback Period Rule

How long does it take the project to “pay back” its initial investment?

Payback Period = number of years to recover initial costs

Minimum Acceptance Criteria: set by management

Ranking Criteria: set by management

Page 6: Capital budgeting i

6

The Payback Period Rule (continued) Disadvantages:

Ignores the time value of money Ignores cash flows after the payback periodBiased against long-term projectsRequires an arbitrary acceptance criteriaA project accepted based on the payback criteria

may not have a positive NPV Advantages:

Easy to understandBiased toward liquidity

Page 7: Capital budgeting i

7

The Discounted PaybackPeriod Rule How long does it take the project to “pay

back” its initial investment taking the time value of money into account?

By the time you have discounted the cash flows, you might as well calculate the NPV.

Page 8: Capital budgeting i

8

The Average Accounting Return Rule

Another attractive but fatally flawed approach. Ranking Criteria and Minimum Acceptance Criteria

set by management Disadvantages:

Ignores the time value of money Uses an arbitrary benchmark cutoff rate Based on book values, not cash flows and market values

Advantages: The accounting information is usually available Easy to calculate

Investent of ValueBook Average

IncomeNet AverageAAR

Page 9: Capital budgeting i

9

The Internal Rate of Return (IRR) Rule IRR: the discount that sets NPV to zero Minimum Acceptance Criteria:

Accept if the IRR exceeds the required return. Ranking Criteria:

Select alternative with the highest IRR Reinvestment assumption:

All future cash flows assumed reinvested at the IRR. Disadvantages:

Does not distinguish between investing and borrowing. IRR may not exist or there may be multiple IRR Problems with mutually exclusive investments

Advantages: Easy to understand and communicate

Page 10: Capital budgeting i

10

The Internal Rate of Return: ExampleConsider the following project:

0 1 2 3

$50 $100 $150

-$200

The internal rate of return for this project is 19.44%

32 )1(

150$

)1(

100$

)1(

50$200

IRRIRRIRR

Page 11: Capital budgeting i

11

The NPV Payoff Profile for This Example

Discount Rate NPV0% $100.004% $71.048% $47.3212% $27.7916% $11.6520% ($1.74)24% ($12.88)28% ($22.17)32% ($29.93)36% ($36.43)40% ($41.86)

If we graph NPV versus discount rate, we can see the IRR as the x-axis intercept.

IRR = 19.44%

($60.00)

($40.00)

($20.00)

$0.00

$20.00

$40.00

$60.00

$80.00

$100.00

$120.00

-1% 9% 19% 29% 39%

Discount rate

NP

V

Page 12: Capital budgeting i

12

Problems with the IRR Approach

Multiple IRRs. Are We Borrowing or Lending? The Scale Problem The Timing Problem

Page 13: Capital budgeting i

13

Multiple IRRsThere are two IRRs for this project:

0 1 2 3

$200 $800

-$200

- $800

($150.00)

($100.00)

($50.00)

$0.00

$50.00

$100.00

-50% 0% 50% 100% 150% 200%

Discount rate

NP

V

100% = IRR2

0% = IRR1

Which one should we use?

Page 14: Capital budgeting i

14

Managers like rates--prefer IRR to NPV comparisons. Can we give them a better IRR?

Yes, MIRR is the discount rate whichcauses the PV of a project’s terminalvalue (TV) to equal the PV of costs.TV is found by compounding inflowsat a discount rate.

Thus, MIRR assumes cash inflows are reinvested at a discount rate.

Page 15: Capital budgeting i

15

MIRR = 16.5%

10.0 80.060.0

0 1 2 310%

66.0 12.1

158.1

MIRR for Project L (k = 10%)

-100.010%

10%

TV inflows-100.0

PV outflowsMIRRL = 16.5%

$100 = $158.1

(1+MIRRL)3

Page 16: Capital budgeting i

16

The Scale Problem

Would you rather make 100% or 50% on your investments?

What if the 100% return is on a $1 investment while the 50% return is on a $1,000 investment?

Page 17: Capital budgeting i

17

The Timing Problem

0 1 2 3

$10,000 $1,000$1,000

-$10,000

Project A

0 1 2 3

$1,000 $1,000 $12,000

-$10,000

Project B

The preferred project in this case depends on the discount rate, not the IRR.

Page 18: Capital budgeting i

18

The Timing Problem

($4,000.00)

($3,000.00)

($2,000.00)

($1,000.00)

$0.00

$1,000.00

$2,000.00

$3,000.00

$4,000.00

$5,000.00

0% 10% 20% 30% 40%

Discount rate

NP

VProject A

Project B10.55% = crossover rate

16.04% = IRRA12.94% = IRRB

Page 19: Capital budgeting i

19

Calculating the Crossover RateCompute the IRR for either project “A-B” or “B-A”

Year Project A Project B Project A-B Project B-A 0 ($10,000) ($10,000) $0 $01 $10,000 $1,000 $9,000 ($9,000)2 $1,000 $1,000 $0 $03 $1,000 $12,000 ($11,000) $11,000

($3,000.00)

($2,000.00)

($1,000.00)

$0.00

$1,000.00

$2,000.00

$3,000.00

0% 5% 10% 15% 20%

Discount rate

NP

V A-B

B-A

10.55% = IRR

Page 20: Capital budgeting i

20

Mutually Exclusive vs.Independent Project Mutually Exclusive Projects: only ONE of several

potential projects can be chosen, e.g. acquiring an accounting system.

RANK all alternatives and select the best one.

Independent Projects: accepting or rejecting one project does not affect the decision of the other projects.

Must exceed a MINIMUM acceptance criteria.

Page 21: Capital budgeting i

21

The Profitability Index (PI) Rule

Minimum Acceptance Criteria: Accept if PI > 1

Ranking Criteria: Select alternative with highest PI

Disadvantages: Problems with mutually exclusive investments

Advantages: May be useful when available investment funds are limited Easy to understand and communicate Correct decision when evaluating independent projects

Investent Initial

FlowsCash Future of PV TotalPI

Page 22: Capital budgeting i

22

The Practice of Capital Budgeting

Varies by industry:Some firms use payback, others use accounting

rate of return. The most frequently used technique for large

corporations is IRR or NPV.

Page 23: Capital budgeting i

23

Example of Investment Rules

Compute the IRR, NPV, PI, and payback period for the following two projects. Assume the required return is 10%.

Year Project A Project B

0 -$200-$150

1 $200 $50

2 $800 $100

3 -$800$150

Page 24: Capital budgeting i

24

Example of Investment Rules

Project A Project B

CF0 -$200.00 -$150.00

PV0 of CF1-3 $241.92 $240.80

NPV = $41.92 $90.80

IRR = 0%, 100% 36.19%

PI = 1.2096 1.6053

Page 25: Capital budgeting i

25

Example of Investment Rules

Payback Period:Project A Project B

Time CF Cum. CF CF Cum. CF

0 -200 -200 -150 -1501 200 0 50 -1002 800 800 100 03 -800 0 150 150

Payback period for project B = 2 years.Payback period for project A = 1 or 3 years?

Page 26: Capital budgeting i

26

Relationship Between NPV and IRR

Discount rate NPV for A NPV for B-10% -87.52 234.770% 0.00 150.0020% 59.26 47.9240% 59.48 -8.6060% 42.19 -43.0780% 20.85 -65.64100% 0.00 -81.25120% -18.93 -92.52

Page 27: Capital budgeting i

27

Project AProject B

($200)

($100)

$0

$100

$200

$300

$400

-15% 0% 15% 30% 45% 70% 100% 130% 160% 190%

Discount rates

NP

V

IRR 1(A) IRR (B)

NPV Profiles

Cross-over Rate

IRR 2(A)

Page 28: Capital budgeting i

28

Summary and Conclusions

This lecture evaluates the most popular alternatives to NPV:Payback periodAccounting rate of return Internal rate of returnProfitability index

When it is all said and done, they are not the NPV rule; for those of us in finance, it makes them decidedly second-rate.