CAPITAL BUDGET FY 2013 · 2016. 6. 21. · Capital Budget Process ... FY 2013 Capital Budget...

58
CAPITAL BUDGET FY 2013 & CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FY 2014 - 2018 REQUEST CARROLL COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS Board of Education Discussion 8/24/2011

Transcript of CAPITAL BUDGET FY 2013 · 2016. 6. 21. · Capital Budget Process ... FY 2013 Capital Budget...

Page 1: CAPITAL BUDGET FY 2013 · 2016. 6. 21. · Capital Budget Process ... FY 2013 Capital Budget Request ... update to the March 2008 Report on Physical and Functional Assessments of

CAPITAL BUDGET FY 2013

& CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

FY 2014 - 2018

REQUEST

CARROLL COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS

Board of Education Discussion 8/24/2011

Page 2: CAPITAL BUDGET FY 2013 · 2016. 6. 21. · Capital Budget Process ... FY 2013 Capital Budget Request ... update to the March 2008 Report on Physical and Functional Assessments of

BOARD OF EDUCATION

Jennifer Seidel, President

Barbara Shreeve, Vice-President

Gary Bauer

Cynthia Foley

Virginia Harrison

Angela N. Bladen, Student Representative

SUPERINTENDENT

Stephen H. Guthrie

Page 3: CAPITAL BUDGET FY 2013 · 2016. 6. 21. · Capital Budget Process ... FY 2013 Capital Budget Request ... update to the March 2008 Report on Physical and Functional Assessments of

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Superintendent’s Letter.............................................................................................................................1 INTRODUCTION Capital Budget and Capital Improvement Program......................................................................2 Capital Budget Process .................................................................................................................2 Project Identification ....................................................................................................................3 Prioritization of Projects ...............................................................................................................4 Project Budget Development ........................................................................................................4 CAPITAL BUDGET AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FY 2013 Capital Budget Request .................................................................................................7 FY 2014 – 2018 Capital Improvement Program Request ............................................................8 Project Description and Justification Forms.................................................................................9 APPENDICES Appendix A: CCPS Student Enrollment Projections 2011-2020 ..............................................37 Appendix B: School Capacity and Utilization Numbers 2011-2020.........................................38 Appendix C: Relocatable Classroom Placements 2011-2012 School Year ..............................55

Page 4: CAPITAL BUDGET FY 2013 · 2016. 6. 21. · Capital Budget Process ... FY 2013 Capital Budget Request ... update to the March 2008 Report on Physical and Functional Assessments of

1

FROM: Stephen H. Guthrie, Superintendent SUBJECT: Proposed FY2013 Capital Budget Request, Proposed FY 2014-2018 Capital

Improvement Program This document presents the recommendation for the FY2013 Capital Budget Request and Proposed FY 2014-2018 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for Carroll County Public Schools. The purpose of this plan is to address the facility needs identified in the 2011-2020 Educational Facilities Master Plan. This plan takes into consideration current and projected student enrollments, the age and condition of facilities, and the current and future needs of the instructional program. The projects detailed in this document have been identified as necessary to maintain adequate school facilities in order to deliver a quality instructional program. Some highlights of the FY 2013 Capital Budget and FY 2014- 2018 CIP Request are:

• The FY 2013 Capital Budget request is for $22,627,000. The County share of this request is $8,144,000 and the State share is $14,483,000.

• The FY 2014 – 2018 CIP request total is $233,070,000. The anticipated County share of

these projects is $139,763,000, based on the State share being $93,307,000. • The cumulative total of the six year request (FY 2013 – 2018) is $255,697,000. This

total includes $233,185,000 in systemic renovations and modernizations to older buildings.

• A total of 338 additional seats are provided from projects scheduled in this document.

The completion of these projects will address all projected inadequate schools.

• The scheduling of school modernizations in this years request is based on the 2011 update to the March 2008 Report on Physical and Functional Assessments of Schools Constructed Prior to 1980.

A public hearing will be held on Wednesday September 7, 2011 at 7:00 p.m. in the Charles I. Ecker Boardroom located at 125 North Court Street Westminster, Maryland 21157. This hearing provides an opportunity for interested parties to provide input on this CIP Budget Request. The Board of Education is scheduled to approve this document at its administrative board meeting on September 28, 2011 at 1 p.m. The approved Capital Budget and CIP Request will then be forwarded to the Carroll County Commissioners and to the Maryland Public School Construction Program. Additional information may be obtained by calling Raymond Prokop, Director of Facilities, at 410-751-3177.

Page 5: CAPITAL BUDGET FY 2013 · 2016. 6. 21. · Capital Budget Process ... FY 2013 Capital Budget Request ... update to the March 2008 Report on Physical and Functional Assessments of

2

The Capital Budget and Capital Improvements Program Request This Capital Budget request is for school projects that are being requested for the next fiscal year. Funding for these projects is received from both the County and State. Once the County and State adopt their capital budgets, which include school projects, funds for that fiscal year are transferred to Carroll County Public Schools (CCPS). The Capital Improvement Program (CIP) request refers to school projects that are scheduled to occur in the next five future fiscal years. An important distinction between the capital budget and the CIP is that the funding for projects included in the Capital Budget becomes part of the legally adopted budget, but the longer term CIP is not legally binding. As a result, it not unusual for projects included in the capital improvements program to change from year to year based on things like changes in the state and county fiscal picture, changes in enrollment trends, changes in the instructional program, and unanticipated changes in the condition of systems and equipment. The capital budget differs from the operating budget in that it is structured in terms of projects. Each project within the capital budget is a “mini budget” in itself, and the budget/funds may be spent over multiple fiscal years ending with the completion of the project. Capital Budget Projects are typically large in scope and address improvements and renewal of the school system’s physical plant. Although the capital and operating budgets are separate, the relationship between them is a critical consideration in the overall fiscal picture of CCPS. The capital budget impacts the operating budget in three ways. First the issuance of general obligation bonds, required to fund capital projects, creates the need to fund debt service payments in the operating budget. Second, a portion of the capital budget request is funded by current revenues, which are the same sources that fund the operating budget. Finally, new schools and additions create operating budget impacts due to increased costs for staff, utilities, maintenance, and other services. Capital Budget Process The Capital Budget process actually begins each year with the annual update of the Educational Facilities Master Plan. This document evaluates the facility needs of the system and identifies a calendar of projects to address these needs. This document is presented to the Board of Education in April each year, and is then approved in June for submission to the State by July 1. After the approval of the Educational Facilities Master Plan, the next step is for staff to develop the annual Capital Budget and CIP request in July and August. This document is presented to the Board of Education in August, and approved by the Board of Education in September of each year. Once the Board of Education approves the annual Capital Budget and CIP request, it is then submitted to the Carroll County Department of Management and Budget (DMB). The DMB staff reviews this request and presents their preliminary recommendation for capital projects to the Carroll County Planning and Zoning Commission in February. The Planning and Zoning

Page 6: CAPITAL BUDGET FY 2013 · 2016. 6. 21. · Capital Budget Process ... FY 2013 Capital Budget Request ... update to the March 2008 Report on Physical and Functional Assessments of

3

Commission utilizes this information to make their recommendation for school projects to the Board of Carroll County Commissioners. In early March, the DMB makes their final recommendations to the Commissioners. Also in March, the Commissioners hold work sessions with each agency to review their specific requests. The Commissioners then issue their Proposed Budget, and hold public hearings to receive public comments regarding this document. After the hearings are held, the Commissioners make any necessary adjustments and the budget is adopted at the end of May each year. In order to receive State funds for school construction, CCPS must meet the requirements of the Maryland Public School Construction Program regarding the submittal of the Capital Improvement Program. The first step in this process is that CCPS must submit or amend its Educational Facilities Master Plan by July 1. After this submission in July, the next step is to submit the Capital Improvement Program Request to the Maryland Public School Construction Program at the beginning of October. This CIP request consists of three major parts: Current Planning Approval Requests, Current Funding Approval Requests, and Future Project Request. Current Planning Approval Requests are for projects that CCPS wants to begin design on in the next fiscal year. Due to the fact that the State does not contribute funds to the design of school construction projects, design must be funded through County capital funds. State Planning Approval does give CCPS a commitment for future state funding for a specific project. Current Funding Requests are projects for which State funding is being requested for the next fiscal year. Future Project Requests include projects that are scheduled to be state requests in the next five future fiscal years. Once the CIP has been submitted to the Public School Construction Program, their staff then makes recommendations to the Interagency Committee on School Construction (IAC) for project approvals. The IAC then holds a hearing to allow each jurisdiction to make their case for additional funds or projects not recommended by staff. The IAC then makes their official recommendation to the Maryland Board of Public Works (BPW). The BPW then holds a hearing to allow each jurisdiction to make their case for additional funds or projects not recommended by the IAC. After the hearing, the BPW then approves initial projects totaling seventy five percent (75%) of the total budget allocated for Public School Construction. The remaining projects making up twenty five percent (25%) of the public school construction budget are approved by the BPW in May each year. IDENTIFYING PROJECTS This 2013 Capital Budget and 2014-2018 Capital Improvement Program Request is based on the facility needs identified in the 2011 - 2020 Educational Facilities Master Plan. The projects scheduled in this document address the need for additional capacity at the middle school level, the need to modernize aging schools, the need to meet changing instructional philosophies, and the need for building system replacements.

Page 7: CAPITAL BUDGET FY 2013 · 2016. 6. 21. · Capital Budget Process ... FY 2013 Capital Budget Request ... update to the March 2008 Report on Physical and Functional Assessments of

4

PRIORITIZATION In order to communicate to both funding authorities the highest priority projects in the current budget request, projects are listed in priority order. Projects included in the Capital Budget Request are ranked in accordance with the following criteria:

1. Projects partially funded and currently in progress 2. Projects that provide additional capacity to address inadequate schools 3. Projects that include the replacement of critical building systems necessary to maintain

school operations. 4. Projects that improve the ability of a facility to accommodate the current instructional

program. 5. Projects that provide general improvements to increase the levels of efficiency in the

operation of school facilities. PROJECT BUDGET DEVELOPMENT Cost estimates for each project included in the Capital Improvement Program must be developed in order to make a request for funding. Depending on the project type, the method for developing the budget may vary. Most projects utilize a cost per square foot number to determine the construction cost of the project. Each year the Maryland Public School Construction Program publishes a cost per square foot number that is used for all state funded projects. The number utilized in this document is $207 per square foot for the building only, and $232 for the building with site development. Until a Construction Planning Committee is formed to develop the Educational Specifications for a new school or addition, it is difficult to determine how many square feet are needed for a project. As a result the initial square footage for a project is based on the square foot allowance per student published by the Maryland Public School Construction Program. The following are the square foot allowance per student based on optimum size school standards contained in the Educational Facilities Master Plan. Elementary School (Capacity = 600)

• 108 square feet per regular education student • 180 square feet per special education student

Middle School (Capacity = 750)

• 135 square feet per regular education student • 180 square feet per special education student

Page 8: CAPITAL BUDGET FY 2013 · 2016. 6. 21. · Capital Budget Process ... FY 2013 Capital Budget Request ... update to the March 2008 Report on Physical and Functional Assessments of

5

High School (Capacity = 1200)

• 187,350 square feet total for a school with a capacity between 1,151 to 1,249 • 200 square feet per special education student • 210 square feet per career and technology student

In addition to the cost to construct the building, each project also has necessary costs associated with it. Typically these other costs will be based on a percentage of the building construction cost. These percentages are evaluated against actual project bids annually to verify their validity. The following is a list of these additional items that make up the total project estimate

Site costs – 12% for new construction; 5% for renovations

Architect and Engineering Fees –

• New Schools and Renovations – 7% of the total construction and site budget. • Roofing and HVAC Projects – 8% of total construction and site budget

Construction Management Fees –

• Pre-construction services – 2% of the total construction and site budget • Construction Management services – 6% of the total construction and site

budget

Contingency

• New Construction – 5% of the total construction and site budget. • Renovation/Modernization/Addition – 7% of the total construction and site

budget.

Furniture and Equipment budget request is based on a percentage of the total building construction cost estimate depending on the type of project as listed below:

• Elementary School – 8% • Secondary School – 10% • Career & Technology – 12%

Other costs – Miscellaneous items, such as roads, utilities, agency review fees,

asbestos and lead abatement, impact fees, etc. will vary with project

Page 9: CAPITAL BUDGET FY 2013 · 2016. 6. 21. · Capital Budget Process ... FY 2013 Capital Budget Request ... update to the March 2008 Report on Physical and Functional Assessments of

6

Off-site Improvements – Any off-site improvement necessary for the school project (i.e. roads, water and sewer lines, etc.) will be performed by Carroll County Government

Page 10: CAPITAL BUDGET FY 2013 · 2016. 6. 21. · Capital Budget Process ... FY 2013 Capital Budget Request ... update to the March 2008 Report on Physical and Functional Assessments of

State Local State County Total StateRequest

For CountyRequest

ForTotal

Request1 1 Mt. Airy MS Replacement 4,871$ 18,838$ 23,709$ 7,766$ (C) 1,200$ (E) 8,966$ 2 2 Freedom ES Heat Plant Conversion 205$ 205$ 1,473$ (SR) 1,257$ (C) 2,730$ 3 3 West MS Roof Replacement 235$ 235$ 1,703$ (SR) 1,497$ (C) 3,200$ 4 4 William Winchester ES Roof Replacement 75$ 75$ 527$ (SR) 468$ (C) 995$ 5 Westminster ES Open Space Enclosures 1,453$ (C) 1,453$ 6 Robert Moton ES Open Space Enclosures 1,561$ (C) 1,561$

5 Charles Carroll ES Heat Plant Conversion 200$ (P) 200$ 6 Charles Carroll ES Roof Replacement 60$ (P) 60$ 7 Sandymount Roof Replacement 135$ (P) 135$ 8 CCCTC Roof Replacement 205$ (P) 205$ 9 East Middle HVAC Replacement 580$ (P) 580$ 10 Paving 735$ (C) 735$ 11 Technology Improvements 1,205$ (C) 1,205$ 12 Roofing Improvements 145$ (C) 145$ 13 Barrier Free Modifications 37$ (C) 37$ 14 Relocatable Classroom Movement 420$ (C) 420$

4,871$ 19,353$ 24,224$ 14,483$ 8,144$ 22,627$

(S) = HVAC Scope Study(FS) = PSCP Required Feasibility Study(P) = Planning Approval [State] or Planning Funds [County] (SR) = Systemic Renovation(C) = Construction Funding(E) = Furniture & Equipment Funds

NOTE: All dollar figures are shown in thousands

FY 2013 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BUDGET REQUEST

Priority Prior Authorization/Allocation Fiscal Year 2013 Funding Request

7

Page 11: CAPITAL BUDGET FY 2013 · 2016. 6. 21. · Capital Budget Process ... FY 2013 Capital Budget Request ... update to the March 2008 Report on Physical and Functional Assessments of

Project Title State Local State Local State Local State Local State Local Total

Modernizations -$ Charles Carroll ES Modernization 1,020$ 6,068$ 6,032$ 850$ 13,970$ Carroll County Career & Technology Ctr. Replacement 5,220$ 5,000$ 6,720$ 10,000$ 26,285$ 10,000$ 9,205$ 72,430$ Wm. Winchester ES Modernization 65$ 1,570$ 8,536$ 10,114$ 1,300$ 21,585$ Westminster East MS Modernization 65$ 3,260$ 20,436$ 21,684$ 45,445$ Westminster West MS Modernization 70$ 3,855$ 3,925$

-$ Roof Replacements -$

Charles Carroll ES - Roof Replacement 430$ 385$ 815$ Carroll County Career & Technology Ctr. - Roof Replacement 1,474$ 1,301$ 2,775$ Sandymount ES - Roof Replacement 957$ 843$ 1,800$ Carroll Springs - Roof Replacement 85$ 613$ 542$ 1,240$ Manchester ES - Roof Replacement 135$ 952$ 843$ 1,930$ Mechanicsville ES - Roof Replacement 150$ 1,054$ 931$ 2,135$ South Carroll HS - Roof Replacement 365$ 2,642$ 2,258$ 5,265$ Francis Scott Key HS - Roof Replacement 310$ 2,220$ 1,955$ 4,485$ Westminster East MS - Roof Replacement 140$ 987$ 873$ 2,000$ Westminster HS - Roof Replacement 350$ 350$

-$ -$

Charles Carroll ES - Heat Plant Conversion 1,450$ 1,050$ 2,500$ Westminster East MS - System Replacement 4,190$ 3,580$ 7,770$ Manchester ES - System Replacement 280$ 2,021$ 1,729$ 4,030$ Carroll County Career & Technology Ctr. - Rooftop Unit Replacement 50$ 570$ 4,111$ 3,514$ 8,245$ Spring Garden ES - System Replacement 50$ 255$ 1,825$ 1,565$ 3,695$ Sandymount ES - System Replacement 50$ 290$ 2,070$ 1,770$ 4,180$ Winfield ES - System Replacement 50$ 325$ 375$ New Windsor MS - System Replacement 50$ 50$

-$ Kindergarten Additions -$

Taneytown ES Kindergarten Addition 80$ 728$ 642$ 1,450$ Cranberry Station ES Kindergarten Addition 70$ 634$ 556$ 1,260$

-$ Open Space Classroom Enclosure -$

Eldersburg Elementary 1,635$ 1,635$ -$

Science Room Renovation -$ North Carroll High 95$ 734$ 791$ 1,620$ Westminster High 100$ 766$ 824$ 1,690$ South Carroll High 55$ 399$ 431$ 885$

Liberty High 55$ 415$ 450$ 920$ -$ -$

Relocatable Classroom Movement 440$ 460$ 480$ 500$ 520$ 2,400$ Paving 775$ 815$ 855$ 900$ 945$ 4,290$ Technology Improvements 580$ 605$ 540$ 540$ 540$ 2,805$ Roofing Improvements 150$ 155$ 160$ 165$ 170$ 800$ Barrier Free Modifications 39$ 41$ 43$ 45$ 47$ 215$

-$ Electrical Service Upgrades 305$ 245$ 205$ 195$ 950$

-$ Fire Alarm Replacement 125$ 130$ 255$

-$ Window Replacements 145$ 155$ 305$ 295$ 900$ -$

10,281$ 10,963$ 10,388$ 18,738$ 14,911$ 20,792$ 23,185$ 46,630$ 34,542$ 42,640$ 233,070$

FY 2014-2018 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN($ ,000 omitted)

FY2014 FY2015 FY2016 FY2017 FY2018

Annual Requests

HVAC-Replacements

8

Page 12: CAPITAL BUDGET FY 2013 · 2016. 6. 21. · Capital Budget Process ... FY 2013 Capital Budget Request ... update to the March 2008 Report on Physical and Functional Assessments of

Mt Airy Middle Replacement School

Project Description:

Project Justification:

BUDGET REQUEST FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18Prior

Allocation1,965,000

Land AcquisitionSite Work 2,434,000Construction 7,766,000 18,810,000Equipment/Furnishings 1,200,000 500,000Other

TOTAL 8,966,000 23,709,000

SOURCES OF FUNDSCounty 1,200,000 18,838,000State PSCP 7,766,000 4,871,000

This project involves the planning and construction of a 111,000 square foot replacement school, and the demolition of the existing Mt. Airy Middle School. This new school will address the need to modernize the aging Mt. Airy Middle School building, and the need to provide additional middle school capacity in the southern area of the County. Based on the recommendation of the Feasiblity Study, the existing Mt. Airy Middle School building will be replaced with a new 750 seat middle school. The FY 2013 request is for the remaining State share of construction funds, and for County funds for the purchase of furniture and equipment.

1,700,0000

Total Project Cost

Engineering/Design 1,965,0000

2,434,00026,576,000

12,637,000

32,675,000

20,038,000

The original building was constructed in 1958 with an addition constructed in 1981. Based on the Physical and Functional Assessment Report developed in March 2008, Mt. Airy Middle was listed as the third school on the Modernization priority list, behind Charles Carroll and William Winchester Elementary Schools. However, based on the September 30, 2009 enrollment numbers, Mt. Airy Middle School was 93 students over capacity. The Enrollment Projections indicate that Mt. Airy Middle enrollments will continue to grow. As a result of the need for both modernization and capacity, the modernization of Mt. Airy Middle was moved ahead of Charles Carroll and William Winchester on the priority list.

9

Page 13: CAPITAL BUDGET FY 2013 · 2016. 6. 21. · Capital Budget Process ... FY 2013 Capital Budget Request ... update to the March 2008 Report on Physical and Functional Assessments of

Freedom Elementary School Heat Plant Conversion

Project Description:

Project Justification:

BUDGET REQUEST FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18Prior

Allocation205,000

Land AcquisitionSite WorkConstruction 2,540,000Equipment/FurnishingsOther 190,000

TOTAL 2,730,000 205,000

SOURCES OF FUNDSCounty 1,257,000 205,000State PSCP 1,473,000

Although the school was recently air-conditioned as part of the Performance Contract with Johnson Controls, the heating system was not addressed as part of that project. Replacement of Steam Boilers with Hot Water Boilers is a priority of Carroll County Public Schools because Hot Water heating systems operate at a lower pressure, are more efficient, and provide better temperature control than steam systems. In addition to the steam boilers, the majority of the steam distribution system and equipment is in poor condition and in need of replacement.

This project involves the replacement of the Steam Boilers with new Hot Water Boilers, the replacement of the old steam and condensate piping, the replacement of the terminal heat units in the classrooms, the replacement of the pneumatic controls, and the testing and balancing of the system.

0190,000

Total Project Cost

Engineering/Design 205,00000

2,540,000

1,473,000

2,935,000

1,462,000

10

Page 14: CAPITAL BUDGET FY 2013 · 2016. 6. 21. · Capital Budget Process ... FY 2013 Capital Budget Request ... update to the March 2008 Report on Physical and Functional Assessments of

Roof Replacement - Westminster West Middle School

Project Description:

Project Justification:

BUDGET REQUEST FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18Prior

Allocation235,000

Land AcquisitionSite WorkConstruction 2,935,000Equipment/FurnishingsOther 265,000

TOTAL 3,200,000 235,000

SOURCES OF FUNDSCounty 1,497,000 235,000State PSCP 1,703,000

2,935,000

1,703,000

3,435,000

1,732,000

Replacement of the roof is required to protect building structure, building components, and preserve the learning environment which supports the educational programs. The roof is currently leaking in several places. This water infiltration will damage the structural roof deck, interior ceilings, floor and wall finishes, building contents, and provide the conditions which could lead to air quality issues in the building.

Replacement of 115,325 square feet of roofing, associated tapered insulation system, and roof drains and flashings. The 2013 request is for the state and local share of construction costs.

0265,000

Total Project Cost

Engineering/Design 235,00000

11

Page 15: CAPITAL BUDGET FY 2013 · 2016. 6. 21. · Capital Budget Process ... FY 2013 Capital Budget Request ... update to the March 2008 Report on Physical and Functional Assessments of

Roof Replacement - William Winchester Elementary School

Project Description:

Project Justification:

BUDGET REQUEST FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18Prior

Allocation75,000

Land AcquisitionSite WorkConstruction 910,000Equipment/FurnishingsOther 85,000

TOTAL 995,000 75,000

SOURCES OF FUNDSCounty 468,000 75,000State PSCP 527,000

Replacement of 35,220 square feet of roofing, associated tapered insulation system, and roof drains and flashings. The 2013 request is for the state and local share of construction costs.

Replacement of the roof is required to protect building structure, building components, and preserve the learning environment which supports the educational programs. The roof is currently leaking in several places. This water infiltration will damage the structural roof deck, interior ceilings, floor and wall finishes, building contents, and provide the conditions which could lead to air quality issues in the building.

Total Project Cost

Engineering/Design 75,00000

910,0000

527,000

85,000

1,070,000

543,000

12

Page 16: CAPITAL BUDGET FY 2013 · 2016. 6. 21. · Capital Budget Process ... FY 2013 Capital Budget Request ... update to the March 2008 Report on Physical and Functional Assessments of

Open Space Enclosure

Project Description:

Project Justification:

BUDGET REQUEST FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18Prior

Allocation1,000,000

Land AcquisitionSite WorkConstruction 3,014,000 1,635,000 9,216,000Equipment/FurnishingsOther

TOTAL 3,014,000 1,635,000 10,216,000

SOURCES OF FUNDSCounty 0 0 8,000,000State PSCP 3,014,000 1,635,000 2,216,000

This is an improvement to the facility that will minimize distractions between the classrooms by improving the acoustics of the classrooms. The learning environment will improve, thereby contributing to effective student learning, as well as support the Board of Education's goal to provide a safe and orderly learning environment.

Total Project Cost

Engineering/Design 1,000,000

8,000,000

00

13,865,0000

6,865,000

This project provides for the enclosure of an existing open space school building. It includes the construction of interior partitions; installation of exterior exits and fire sprinkler systems where required; alterations to the interior finishes; and modificiations to the HVAC, electrical, and fire alarm systems to comply with life safety and building codes applicable to a conversion from an open space concept school facility to a traditional closed classroom school building. Eight million dollars of funding for Open Space Enclosures was received as part of the adopted 2008 Carroll County Commissioners Capital Budet. The Carrolltowne Elementary and Northwest Middle projects are complete, the Westminster Elementary project is currently under construction, and planning for the Robert Moton Elementary project is scheduled to begin in September 2011. The fiscal year 2013 request is for the State share of construction for the Westminster Elementary and Robert Moton Elementary projects.

The following projects are scheduled:Westminster Elementary School - State Share of Construction Funding(FY13)Robert Moton Elementary School - State Share of Construction Funding(FY13)Eldersburg Elementary School - State Share of Construction Funding (FY14)

0

14,865,000

13

Page 17: CAPITAL BUDGET FY 2013 · 2016. 6. 21. · Capital Budget Process ... FY 2013 Capital Budget Request ... update to the March 2008 Report on Physical and Functional Assessments of

Charles Carroll Elementary School Heat Plant Conversion

Project Description:

Project Justification:

BUDGET REQUEST FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18Prior

Allocation200,000

Land AcquisitionSite WorkConstruction 2,500,000Equipment/FurnishingsOther

TOTAL 200,000 2,500,000

SOURCES OF FUNDSCounty 200,000 1,050,000State PSCP 1,450,000 1,450,000

0

2,700,000

1,250,000

00

2,500,0000

This project involves the replacement of the Steam Boilers with new Hot Water Boilers, the replacement of the old steam and condensate piping, the replacement of the terminal heat units in the classrooms, the replacement of the pneumatic controls, and the testing and balancing of the system. Design funding was received as part of the 2011 capital budget, but is being utilized to hire an architect to perform a feasiblity study to evaluate the options for modernizing Charles Carroll Elementary. This project is being included in the CIP request again in case funding is not provided for a modernization. The 2013 request is for design funding, and the 2014 request is for the state and local share of construction costs.

Although the school was recently air-conditioned as part of the Performance Contract with Johnson Controls, the heating system was not addressed as part of that project. Replacement of Steam Boilers with Hot Water Boilers is a priority of Carroll County Public Schools because Hot Water heating systems operate at a lower pressure, are more efficient, and provide better temperature control than steam systems. In addition to the steam boilers, the majority of the steam distribution system and equipment is in poor condition and in need of replacement.

Total Project Cost

Engineering/Design 200,000

14

Page 18: CAPITAL BUDGET FY 2013 · 2016. 6. 21. · Capital Budget Process ... FY 2013 Capital Budget Request ... update to the March 2008 Report on Physical and Functional Assessments of

Roof Replacement - Charles Carroll Elementary School

Project Description:

Project Justification:

BUDGET REQUEST FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18Prior

Allocation60,000

Land AcquisitionSite WorkConstruction 745,000Equipment/FurnishingsOther 70,000

TOTAL 60,000 815,000

SOURCES OF FUNDSCounty 60,000 385,000State PSCP 430,000

Replacement of the roof is required to protect building structure, building components, and preserve the learning environment which supports the educational programs. The roof is currently leaking in several places. This water infiltration will damage the structural roof deck, interior ceilings, floor and wall finishes, building contents, and provide the conditions which could lead to air quality issues in the building.

Replacement of 27,411 square feet of roofing, associated tapered insulation system, and roof drains and flashings. The 2013 request is for design funding. The 2014 request is for the state and local share of construction costs.

070,000

Total Project Cost

Engineering/Design 60,00000

745,000

430,000

875,000

445,000

15

Page 19: CAPITAL BUDGET FY 2013 · 2016. 6. 21. · Capital Budget Process ... FY 2013 Capital Budget Request ... update to the March 2008 Report on Physical and Functional Assessments of

Roof Replacement - Sandymount Elementary School

Project Description:

Project Justification:

BUDGET REQUEST FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18Prior

Allocation135,000

Land AcquisitionSite WorkConstruction 1,650,000Equipment/FurnishingsOther 150,000

TOTAL 135,000 1,800,000

SOURCES OF FUNDSCounty 135,000 843,000State PSCP 957,000

Replacement of the roof is required to protect building structure, building components, and preserve the learning environment which supports the educational programs. The roof is currently leaking in several places. This water infiltration will damage the structural roof deck, interior ceilings, floor and wall finishes, building contents, and provide the conditions which could lead to air quality issues in the building.

Replacement of 61,044 square feet of roofing, associated tapered insulation system, and roof drains and flashings. The 2013 request is for design funding. The 2014 request is for the state and local share of construction costs.

0150,000

Total Project Cost

Engineering/Design 135,00000

1,650,000

957,000

1,935,000

978,000

16

Page 20: CAPITAL BUDGET FY 2013 · 2016. 6. 21. · Capital Budget Process ... FY 2013 Capital Budget Request ... update to the March 2008 Report on Physical and Functional Assessments of

Roof Replacement - Carroll County Career & Technology Center

Project Description:

Project Justification:

BUDGET REQUEST FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18Prior

Allocation205,000

Land AcquisitionSite WorkConstruction 2,545,000Equipment/FurnishingsOther 230,000

TOTAL 205,000 2,775,000

SOURCES OF FUNDSCounty 205,000 1,301,000State PSCP 1,474,000

2,545,000

1,474,000

2,980,000

1,506,000

Replacement of the roof is required to protect building structure, building components, and preserve the learning environment which supports the educational programs. The roof is currently leaking in several places. This water infiltration will damage the structural roof deck, interior ceilings, floor and wall finishes, building contents, and provide the conditions which could lead to air quality issues in the building.

Replacement of 94,368 square feet of roofing, associated tapered insulation system, and roof drains and flashings. The 2013 request is for design funding. The 2014 request is for the state and local share of construction costs.

0230,000

Total Project Cost

Engineering/Design 205,00000

17

Page 21: CAPITAL BUDGET FY 2013 · 2016. 6. 21. · Capital Budget Process ... FY 2013 Capital Budget Request ... update to the March 2008 Report on Physical and Functional Assessments of

Westminster East Middle - HVAC Replacement

Project Description:

Project Justification:

BUDGET REQUEST FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18Prior

Allocation580,000

Land AcquisitionSite WorkConstruction 7,225,000Equipment/FurnishingsOther 545,000

TOTAL 580,000 7,770,000

SOURCES OF FUNDSCounty 580,000 3,580,000State PSCP 4,190,000

7,225,000

4,190,000

8,350,000

4,160,000

The existing 36 year old HVAC system is well beyond the expected useful life of an typical HVAC system. The central cooling plant is a water-cooled chiller that uses R11 refrigerant. R11 is difficult to find and expesive to purchase because it is no longer used today due to environmental concerns. The central heating plant is made up of two gas-fired steam boilers. Replacement of Steam Boilers with Hot Water Boilers is a priority of Carroll County Public Schools because Hot Water heating systems operate at a lower pressure, are more efficient, and provide better temperature control than steam systems. The existing unit ventilators located in each classroom do not meet current ventilation requirements and are not capable of controlling humidity levels within the school. Proper ventilation and humidity control is necessary to provide a safe and comfortable learning environment for students.

This project involves the replacement of the heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) system for Westminster East Middle school. The existing system was installed during the 1975 renovation of the building. A scope study is being performed in fiscal year 2012 to determine the final scope of work and cost estimate.

0545,000

Total Project Cost

Engineering/Design 580,00000

18

Page 22: CAPITAL BUDGET FY 2013 · 2016. 6. 21. · Capital Budget Process ... FY 2013 Capital Budget Request ... update to the March 2008 Report on Physical and Functional Assessments of

Paving

Project Description:

Project Justification:

BUDGET REQUEST FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18Prior

Allocation

Land AcquisitionSite WorkConstruction 735,000 775,000 815,000 855,000 900,000 945,000 310,000Equipment/FurnishingsOther

TOTAL 735,000 775,000 815,000 855,000 900,000 945,000 310,000

SOURCES OF FUNDSCounty 735,000 775,000 815,000 855,000 900,000 945,000 310,000State PSCP

2016 - Francis Scott Key High (Bus Loop, Service Drive & Upper Parking Lots)2015 - Carroll County Career & Technology Center (Main Parking Lot)

2012 - Hampstead Elementary (Main Parking Lot); Westminster High (Service Area and back drive)

This on-going project addresses the maintenance and replacement of school parking areas and driveways. Potential projects planned include:

2013 - West Middle (Monroe Street Parking Lot & Service Area)2014 - West Middle & William Winchester (Main Parking Lot)

Maintaining the paved areas delays or eliminates the need for much more costly parking and driveway reconstruction projects. It also prevents damage to school buses; maintenance vehicles during snow removal activities; and the vehicles of staff, parents and visitors. Contributes to the prevention of injuries to the students, employees and the public who utilize the parking areas. As the age of the parking areas continues to increase, the quality of the surface will continue to deteriorate and, depending upon weather conditions, the roadway will fail. All of the projects included in this CIP request have large areas where the paving has failed and require total reconstruction. Without the requested increase in funding for paving, these projects will be pushed out even farther and the amount of failed pavement will continue to increase.

2017 - Westminster High (Student Lot & Stadium Lot)2018 - North Carroll High (Bus Loop, Service Area, & Lower Lot)

0

5,335,000

5,335,000

00

Total Project Cost

Engineering/Design 000

5,335,000

19

Page 23: CAPITAL BUDGET FY 2013 · 2016. 6. 21. · Capital Budget Process ... FY 2013 Capital Budget Request ... update to the March 2008 Report on Physical and Functional Assessments of

Technology Improvements

Project Description:

Project Justification:

BUDGET REQUEST FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18Prior

Allocation

Land AcquisitionSite WorkConstructionEquipment/Furnishings 1,205,000 580,000 605,000 540,000 540,000 540,000 0Other

TOTAL 1,205,000 580,000 605,000 540,000 540,000 540,000 0

SOURCES OF FUNDSCounty 1,205,000 580,000 605,000 540,000 540,000 540,000 0State PSCP

This project addresses the integration of new and systematic replenishment of core technology infrastructure hardware and software. It includes installation, expansion, and replacement of hardware such as servers; storage; telecommunications devices; and network infrastructure equipment including switches, routers, and firewalls. Cabling upgrades, wireless technologies, and other technology delivery systems and equipment is included in the expanding technology infrastructure of the school system. End-user computing devices connect to this technology infrastructure that provides links to available software, databases, the wide area network, telecommunications networks, various private networks, the Internet.

In addition to the annual infrastructure costs this project supports, the FY 2013 request also includes a one-time project of $550,000 to expand the the central Data Center. There is an urgent need to reconfigure rack space for equipment and to upgrade the electrical infrastructure and HVAC capability. As we expand our technology capabilities and pull back servers and storage from schools to centralized locations, there is a need to support and adequately protect theinvestment in this core technology infrastructure. The technology improvements that require this additional space are necessary to protect our investments, create operational efficiencies, keep pace with current standards, and provide required educational opportunities to students.

4,010,0000

Total Project Cost

Engineering/Design 0000

0

4,010,000

4,010,000

A systematic replacement and upgrading of technology infrastructure is critical to preventing Carroll County Public Schools from slipping into technological obsolescence. Further, critical infrastructure upgrades are necessary to meet the requirements of the MSDE Technology Plan, the Federal No Child Left Behind Act, Maryland's Race-To-The Top initiative, Financial and the State Legislative Audits, other legislation including Sarbanes Oxley and CALEA, and the expectations of public agencies in regards to Business Continuity/Disaster Recovery. This program assures that the school system's computing hardware will keep pace with technological advances that will prepare students for the rapidly changing workforce and retire aging equpiment. Without a planned program of replacement the school system will realize a degradation of its ability to support instructional programs and services. Further, technology investments are required to realize the cost savings and benefit of the Carroll County Public Network.

20

Page 24: CAPITAL BUDGET FY 2013 · 2016. 6. 21. · Capital Budget Process ... FY 2013 Capital Budget Request ... update to the March 2008 Report on Physical and Functional Assessments of

Roofing Improvements

Project Description:

Project Justification:

BUDGET REQUEST FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18Prior

Allocation

Land AcquisitionSite WorkConstruction 145,000 150,000 155,000 160,000 165,000 170,000 140,000Equipment/FurnishingsOther

TOTAL 145,000 150,000 155,000 160,000 165,000 170,000 140,000

SOURCES OF FUNDSCounty 145,000 150,000 155,000 160,000 165,000 170,000 140,000State PSCP

1,085,000

0

1,085,000

1,085,000

Protection of the building components and contents, as well as preserves the learning environment which supports the educational programs. This project allows for the extension of the life cycle of partial areas of the building's roofing system until the cost effective replacement of the total roof system can be funded and scheduled. It addresses emergency repairs and permits immediate corrective action that prevents water infiltration into the building envelope. This water infiltration would damage the structural roof deck, interior ceilings, floor and wall finishes, building contents, and provide the conditions which could lead to air quality issues in the building.

This project addresses general roofing repairs required during the life cycle of a roof system at various facilities. These repairs are to restore the roof system that has been damaged through normal wear and tear and weather or are partial replacement of specific damaged areas. This preventative maintenance maintains the integriy of the roof system and warranties obtained at time of original installation. Annual inspections by the Plant Maintenance department and work order requests identifies roof sections requiring immediate attention.

00

Total Project Cost

Engineering/Design 000

21

Page 25: CAPITAL BUDGET FY 2013 · 2016. 6. 21. · Capital Budget Process ... FY 2013 Capital Budget Request ... update to the March 2008 Report on Physical and Functional Assessments of

Barrier Free Modifications

Project Description:

Project Justification:

BUDGET REQUEST FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18Prior

Allocation

Land AcquisitionSite WorkConstruction 37,000 39,000 41,000 43,000 45,000 47,000Equipment/FurnishingsOther

TOTAL 37,000 39,000 41,000 43,000 45,000 47,000

SOURCES OF FUNDSCounty 37,000 39,000 41,000 43,000 45,000 47,000State PSCP

252,000

0

252,000

252,000

Modifications to school system's facilities are required to accommodate the integration of students with individual education plans, address compliance to ADA codes at specific locations that are noted through public use of the buildings and perform capital renewal of equipment installed to provide handicap assessibilty.

This on-going project provides funding to accommodate individual and group program needs and particular accommodations (changing areas, life skills space, etc.) of special education students as they are integrated into the student population. Funds may also be utilized to address building issues involving staff and public accessibility concerns as they may arise.

00

Total Project Cost

Engineering/Design 000

22

Page 26: CAPITAL BUDGET FY 2013 · 2016. 6. 21. · Capital Budget Process ... FY 2013 Capital Budget Request ... update to the March 2008 Report on Physical and Functional Assessments of

Relocatable Classroom Movement

Project Description:

Project Justification:

BUDGET REQUEST FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18Prior

Allocation

Land AcquisitionSite WorkConstruction 420,000 440,000 460,000 480,000 500,000 520,000 0Equipment/FurnishingsOther

TOTAL 420,000 440,000 460,000 480,000 500,000 520,000 0

SOURCES OF FUNDSCounty 420,000 440,000 460,000 480,000 500,000 520,000 0State PSCP 0

2,820,000

2,820,000

The relocation of these classrooms are essential to the ability of the schol system to manage student population growth in individual school attendance areas, address facility needs for educational and student support progams and house students during modernization and construction projects.

This project provides for the relocation of relocatable classrooms to various school sites to address student enrollment growth and programming issues. Evaluation of September 30th student enrollment data determines availability and decisions are made regarding placement at mid-school year. An evaluation of the condition of the existing relocatable classroom inventory is currently taking place. The funding provided in this project will be essential to implement the plan that is developed for that inventory.

00

Total Project Cost

Engineering/Design 000

2,820,000

23

Page 27: CAPITAL BUDGET FY 2013 · 2016. 6. 21. · Capital Budget Process ... FY 2013 Capital Budget Request ... update to the March 2008 Report on Physical and Functional Assessments of

Charles Carroll Modernization

Project Description:

Project Justification:

BUDGET REQUEST FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18Prior

Allocation1,020,000

Land AcquisitionSite Work 700,000Construction 10,605,000Equipment/Furnishings 850,000Other 795,000

TOTAL 1,020,000 12,100,000 850,000 0

SOURCES OF FUNDSCounty 1,020,000 6,032,000 850,000State PSCP 6,068,000

Based on the Physical and Functional Assessment Report developed in March 2008 and updated in 2011, Charles Carroll Elementary was listed as the first school on the Modernization priority list. The original building was constructed in 1929 with additions constructed in 1950 and in 1973. Instructional and support spaces need to be modernized in order to accomodate today's instructional program. The installation of wet-pipe sprinkler system will enhance life safety and reduce insurance costs. Replacement of aging building systems and components such as roofing, exterior windows, plumbing, life safety, security, technology and telecommunication systems; and heating systems is required to protect the school system's physical assets. This modernization should also address ADA accessibility concerns; and if feasible reconfigure the building interior to support the elementary school educational program delivery.

This project involves the renovation of Charles Carroll Elementary School. Due to the fact that the majority of this building is over 50 years old, multiple systemic replacements are necessary. The school also has several educational deficiencies which need to be addressed,but the lack of capacity in the existing septic systems limits renovation options. Any renovations to the current building will have to address functional inadequacies where feasible without adding additional square footage to the school. A Feasibility Study is currenlty being performed to evaluate the different options for addressing the physical and educational deficiencies at the school.

850,000795,000

Total Project Cost

Engineering/Design 1,020,0000

700,00010,605,000

6,068,000

13,970,000

7,902,000

24

Page 28: CAPITAL BUDGET FY 2013 · 2016. 6. 21. · Capital Budget Process ... FY 2013 Capital Budget Request ... update to the March 2008 Report on Physical and Functional Assessments of

New Carroll County Career & Technology Center

Project Description:

Project Justification:

BUDGET REQUEST FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18Prior

Allocation5,220,000 40,000

Land AcquisitionSite Work 6,720,000Construction 5,000,000 36,285,000 10,000,000Equipment/Furnishings 6,155,000Other 3,050,000

TOTAL 5,220,000 11,720,000 36,285,000 19,205,000 40,000

SOURCES OF FUNDSCounty 5,220,000 6,720,000 26,285,000 9,205,000 40,000State PSCP 5,000,000 10,000,000 10,000,000

51,285,000

25,000,000

72,470,000

47,470,000

A Scope Study was conducted in 2006 to evaluate the physical condition and educational adequacy of the Carroll County Career & Technology Center. The Study identified multiple building systems that need replacement in the near future, but the greater problem indentified in the evaluation was the educational adequacy of the current building. The current building opened in 1971, and offered 15 vocational programs to students. An addition was constructed in 1987 adding 3 programs (HVAC, Welding, and Diesel) to the Center, bringing the total number of programs up to 18. In 2007 there were 20 programs with 24 teaching stations (some programs offer multiple sections) being offered at the building. As a result of the over crowding and the fact that the original design of the building was not based on today's requirements for programs, the Study determined that the current building is not meeting the educational needs of the programs being offered. In order to continue these current programs and add new programs relevant to today's labor market the Scope Study presented 3 options. The three options were: - Renovate and expand the existing school - Build a replacement school on the Westminster High site - Build a replacement school on a new siteDue to the detrimental impact to the high school the second option was not seriously considered. The added expense of phasing, the difficulty of maintaining the specialized CTE programs during a phased renovation, and the fact that the Board of Education already owns a school site in close proximity to the current CCCTC made the third option the mostfeasible choice..

This project involves the design and construction of a new Career & Technology Center to accommodate 750 students in 29 occupational programs. This new building will replace the current Carroll County Career & Technology Center (CCCTC) built in 1971. State Planning approval was received for fiscal year 2010, however County design funds were not included in the adopted CIP.

6,155,0003,050,000

Total Project Cost

Engineering/Design 5,260,0000

6,720,000

25

Page 29: CAPITAL BUDGET FY 2013 · 2016. 6. 21. · Capital Budget Process ... FY 2013 Capital Budget Request ... update to the March 2008 Report on Physical and Functional Assessments of

William Winchester Elementary School Modernization

Project Description:

Project Justification:

BUDGET REQUEST FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18Prior

Allocation65,000 1,570,000

Land AcquisitionSite Work 1,180,000Construction 16,250,000Equipment/Furnishings 1,300,000Other 1,220,000

TOTAL 65,000 1,570,000 18,650,000 1,300,000

SOURCES OF FUNDSCounty 65,000 1,570,000 10,114,000 1,300,000State PSCP 8,536,000

16,250,000

8,536,000

21,585,000

13,049,000

Based on the Physical and Functional Assessment Report developed in March 2008 and updated in 2011, William Winchester Elementary was listed as the second school on the Modernization priority list. The original building was constructed in 1962 with additions constructed in 1980, 1986, 1990, and 2010. Capital renewal of the building structure and building systems (such as mechanical, electrical, fire alarm, roofing) is required to maintain the school system's physical assets. The instructional and support spaces need to be modernized to facilitate today's instructional program. The installation of fire suppression system will enhance life safety and reduce insurance costs.

This project involves the modernization of William Winchester Elementary School. Due to the fact that the majority of this building will be over 50 years old at the time of modernization, multiple systemic replacements are necessary. A Study was performed in 2003 to evaluate the Modernization needs of the school. Since that time the building was air conditioned as part of the Performance Contract with Johnson Controls in 2005, and a new Kindergarten Addition was completed in 2010. Although these two major deficiencies identified in the 2003 Study have been addressed, the other deficiencies still remain. These deficiencies include: a severely undersized Media Center, the lack of centralized Administration spaces, the lack of sprinkler system, an aging technology infrastructure, a failing roof, an aging central heating plant, a lack of parking, and poor traffic flow. A new Feasibility Study needs to be performed to evaluate options for addressing the physical and educational deficiencies at the school.

1,300,0001,220,000

Total Project Cost

Engineering/Design 1,635,0000

1,180,000

26

Page 30: CAPITAL BUDGET FY 2013 · 2016. 6. 21. · Capital Budget Process ... FY 2013 Capital Budget Request ... update to the March 2008 Report on Physical and Functional Assessments of

East Middle School Modernization

Project Description:

Project Justification:

BUDGET REQUEST FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18Prior

Allocation65,000 3,260,000

Land AcquisitionSite Work 2,235,000Construction 33,955,000Equipment/Furnishings 3,395,000Other 2,535,000

TOTAL 65,000 3,260,000 42,120,000 0

SOURCES OF FUNDSCounty 65,000 3,260,000 21,684,000State PSCP 20,436,000 20,436,000

2,535,000

45,445,000

25,009,000

02,235,000

33,955,0003,395,000

Total Project Cost

Engineering/Design 3,325,000

This project involves the modernization of the existing East Middle School building of 120,400 square feet. Due to the fact that the original bulding is 75 years old, and the last time it was renovated was 1975, the entire building will need to be brought up to current educational and building standards. In order to determine the best way to modernize this school, a Feasibility Study needs to be performed to evaluate options for addressing the physical and educational deficiencies at the school.

Based on the Physical and Functional Assessment Report developed in March 2008 and updated in 2011, East Middle School was listed as the third school on the Modernization priority list. The original building was constructed in 1936 with additions constructed in 1950, 1964, and a modernization in 1975. Capital renewal of the building structure and building systems (such as mechanical, electrical, fire alarm, roofing) is required to maintain the school system's physical assets. Acessibilty issues will need to be addressed to provide access to all programs located within the building. The instructional and support spaces need to be modernized to facilitate the instructional program. The installation of fire suppression system will enhance life safety and reduce insurance costs. .

27

Page 31: CAPITAL BUDGET FY 2013 · 2016. 6. 21. · Capital Budget Process ... FY 2013 Capital Budget Request ... update to the March 2008 Report on Physical and Functional Assessments of

West Middle School Modernization

Project Description:

Project Justification:

BUDGET REQUEST FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18Prior

Allocation70,000 3,855,000

Land AcquisitionSite WorkConstructionEquipment/FurnishingsOther

TOTAL 70,000 3,855,000 0

SOURCES OF FUNDSCounty 70,000 3,855,000State PSCP

Total Project Cost

Engineering/Design 3,925,000

This project involves the modernization of the existing West Middle School building of 135,733 square feet. Due to the fact that the majority of this building will be over 50 years old at the time of modernization, the entire building will need to be brought up to current educational and building standards. In order to determine the best way to modernize this school, a Feasibility Study needs to be performed to evaluate options for addressing the physical and educational deficiencies at the school.

Based on the Physical and Functional Assessment Report developed in March 2008 and updated in 2011, Westminster West Middle was listed as the fourth school on the Modernization priority list.The original building was constructed in 1958 with additions constructed in 1964 and in 1996. The instructional and support spaces need to be modernized to facilitate the instructional program. The installation of fire suppression system will enhance life safety an reduce insurance costs. Additions have resulted in individual life safety systems associated with each addition have been coupled together. Replacement of aging building systems and components such as roofing, electrical, plumbing, life safety, security, technology and telecommunication systems; and heating systems is required to protect the school system's physical assets. This modernization will also address ADA accessibility concerns; and reconfigure the building interior support the middle school educational program delivery.

0000

0

0

3,925,000

3,925,000

28

Page 32: CAPITAL BUDGET FY 2013 · 2016. 6. 21. · Capital Budget Process ... FY 2013 Capital Budget Request ... update to the March 2008 Report on Physical and Functional Assessments of

Taneytown Elementary Kindergarten Addition

Project Description:

Project Justification:

BUDGET REQUEST FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18Prior

Allocation80,000

Land AcquisitionSite Work 135,000Construction 1,080,000Equipment/Furnishings 90,000Other 65,000

TOTAL 80,000 1,370,000

SOURCES OF FUNDSCounty 80,000 642,000State PSCP 728,000 728,000

65,000

1,450,000

722,000

0135,000

1,080,00090,000

Based on projected kindergarten enrollments, two additional kindergarten classroom will be necessary to accomodate additional kindergarten students. The preliminary scope of this project includes the construction of two new kindergarten classrooms, a new prekindergarten classroom, and the renovation of the current prekindergarten classroom to provide access to the new addition. The final scope will be determined once an architect is hired, and the Construction Planning Committee is formed.

Full-day kindergarten was mandated by the State of Maryland through its Bridge to Excellence Act, during the 2002 legislative session. The school was originally constructed with 2 kindergarten classrooms. These two classrooms were not sufficient to accomodate the 78 kindergarteners who were enrolled in 2010. Due to the shortage of kindergarten classrooms, some classes are being held in classrooms that were not designed to meet the instructional needs of kindergarten students. Based on the current enrollment projections, this will continue to be a problem for the school until additional kindergarten classrooms are provided.

Total Project Cost

Engineering/Design 80,000

29

Page 33: CAPITAL BUDGET FY 2013 · 2016. 6. 21. · Capital Budget Process ... FY 2013 Capital Budget Request ... update to the March 2008 Report on Physical and Functional Assessments of

Cranberry Station Elementary Kindergarten Addition

Project Description:

Project Justification:

BUDGET REQUEST FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18Prior

Allocation70,000

Land AcquisitionSite Work 130,000Construction 930,000Equipment/Furnishings 75,000Other 55,000

TOTAL 70,000 1,190,000

SOURCES OF FUNDSCounty 70,000 556,000State PSCP 634,000

Based on projected kindergarten enrollments, two additional kindergarten classroom will be necessary to accomodate these students. The preliminary scope of this project includes the construction of two new kindergarten classrooms. The final scope will be determined once an architect is hired, and the Construction Planning Committee is formed.

Full-day kindergarten was mandated by the State of Maryland through its Bridge to Excellence Act, during the 2002 legislative session. The school was originally constructed with 2 kindergarten classrooms. These two classrooms were not sufficient to accomodate the 65 kindergarteners who were enrolled in 2010. Due to the shortage of kindergarten classrooms, some classes are being held in classrooms that were not designed to meet the instructional needs of kindergarten students. Based on the current enrollment projections, this will continue to be a problem for the school until additional kindergarten classrooms are provided.

Total Project Cost

Engineering/Design 70,0000

130,000930,00075,000

634,000

55,000

1,260,000

626,000

30

Page 34: CAPITAL BUDGET FY 2013 · 2016. 6. 21. · Capital Budget Process ... FY 2013 Capital Budget Request ... update to the March 2008 Report on Physical and Functional Assessments of

Science Room Renovations

Project Description:

Project Justification:

BUDGET REQUEST FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18Prior

Allocation95,000 100,000 55,000 55,000

Land AcquisitionSite Work 65,000 70,000 35,000 40,000Construction 1,265,000 1,320,000 690,000 715,000Equipment/Furnishings 105,000 110,000 55,000 60,000Other 90,000 90,000 50,000 50,000

TOTAL 95,000 1,625,000 1,645,000 885,000 865,000

SOURCES OF FUNDSCounty 95,000 891,000 879,000 486,000 450,000State PSCP 734,000 766,000 399,000 415,000

These projects are part of the Look of the Future High School Science Classroom state initiative. This involves the renovation of aging science classrooms and the introduction of the Carroll County Public Schools’ technology component into these renovated science laboratory spaces. A large number of high school science classrooms were renovated in the 1990's as part of this initiative. The projects included in this request include the remaining unrenovated high school science classrooms.

The following projects are scheduled:North Carroll High School (6 classrooms) - Design (FY14) & Construction (FY15)Westminster High School (6 classrooms) - Design (FY15) & Construction (FY16)South Carroll High School (2 classrooms) - Design (FY16) & Construction (FY17)

The modernization of the science facilities provides a learning environment more consistent with the laboratory experiences the students will experience after graduation. These science facilities will provide the environment necessary to deliver quality science instruction to meet the goals of the science program in the Carroll County Public Schools.

Total Project Cost

Engineering/Design 305,000

Liberty High School (4 classrooms) - Design (FY17) & Construction (FY18)

0210,000

3,990,000330,000

2,314,000

280,000

5,115,000

2,801,000

31

Page 35: CAPITAL BUDGET FY 2013 · 2016. 6. 21. · Capital Budget Process ... FY 2013 Capital Budget Request ... update to the March 2008 Report on Physical and Functional Assessments of

HVAC - Improvements and Replacements

Project Description:

Project Justification:

BUDGET REQUEST FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18Prior

Allocation50,000 330,000 620,000 305,000 340,000 375,000

Land AcquisitionSite WorkConstruction 3,485,000 7,090,000 3,150,000 3,570,000Equipment/FurnishingsOther 265,000 535,000 240,000 270,000

TOTAL 50,000 330,000 4,370,000 7,930,000 3,730,000 4,215,000

SOURCES OF FUNDSCounty 50,000 330,000 2,349,000 3,819,000 1,905,000 2,145,000State PSCP 2,021,000 4,111,000 1,825,000 2,070,000

0

10,027,000

1,310,000

20,625,000

10,598,000

00

17,295,000

Replacement of these systems and equipment is required to protect the building systems' contents and improve ventilation and provide a controlled interior environment to support the learning environment. Due to the fact that there are new ventilation and humidity control requirements necessary for indoor air quality, the complexity of these systems require a detailed study to determine the full scope of project. These Scope Studies will be performed prior to the budget request to examine the options available and determine the actual project budget.

Total Project Cost

Engineering/Design 2,020,000

This on-going project includes funding for the replacement of aging Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC) equipment in school facilities. This project also includes funding for Scope Studies which will be performed a year prior to the budget request. Future Planned Projects include:

Sandymount Elementary system replacement - Scope Study (FY16), Design (FY17) & Construction (FY18)

Manchester Elementary system replacement - Scope Study (FY13), Design (FY14) & Construction (FY15)

Spring Garden Elementary system replacement - Scope Study (FY15), Design (FY16) & Construction (FY17)

New Windsor Middle system replacement - Scope Study (FY18), Design (FY19) & Construction (FY20)

Career & Technology Center system replacement - Scope Study (FY14), Design (FY15) & Construction (FY16)

Winfield Elementary system replacement - Scope Study (FY17), Design (FY18) & Construction (FY19)

32

Page 36: CAPITAL BUDGET FY 2013 · 2016. 6. 21. · Capital Budget Process ... FY 2013 Capital Budget Request ... update to the March 2008 Report on Physical and Functional Assessments of

Systemic Roof Replacements

Project Description:

Project Justification:

BUDGET REQUEST FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18Prior

Allocation220,000 515,000 310,000 140,000 350,000

Land AcquisitionSite WorkConstruction 2,705,000 6,375,000 3,830,000 1,705,000Equipment/FurnishingsOther 245,000 510,000 345,000 155,000

TOTAL 220,000 3,465,000 7,195,000 4,315,000 2,210,000

SOURCES OF FUNDSCounty 220,000 1,900,000 3,499,000 2,095,000 1,223,000State PSCP 1,565,000 3,696,000 2,220,000 987,000

This project involves the replacement of roofs that are beyond their life cycle and are exhibiting signs of approaching failure and are no longer repairable. Their replacement is necessary to protect building components and contents, and preserve the learning environment.

The following projects are scheduled:

Manchester Elementary - Design (FY14) & Construction (FY15)Carroll Springs - Design (FY14) & Construction (FY15)South Carroll High - Design (FY15) & Construction (FY16)Mechanicsville Elementary - Design (FY15) & Construction (FY16)Francis Scott Key High - Design (FY16) & Construction (FY17) East Middle - Design (FY17) & Construction (FY18) Westminster High - Design (FY18) & Construction (FY19)

01,255,000

Total Project Cost

Engineering/Design 1,535,00000

14,615,000

8,468,000

17,405,000

8,937,000

Replacement of roof will be required to protect building structure, building components, and preserve the learning environment which supports the educational programs. Without a roof replacement program, the roofs will continue to deteriorate, which allows water to infiltrate the building envelope. This water infiltration will damage the structural roof deck, interior ceilings, floor and wall finishes, building contents, and provide the conditions which could lead to air quality issues in the building.

33

Page 37: CAPITAL BUDGET FY 2013 · 2016. 6. 21. · Capital Budget Process ... FY 2013 Capital Budget Request ... update to the March 2008 Report on Physical and Functional Assessments of

Electrical System Upgrades

Project Description:

Project Justification:

BUDGET REQUEST FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18Prior

Allocation50,000 50,000

Land AcquisitionSite WorkConstruction 500,000 350,000Equipment/FurnishingsOther

TOTAL 550,000 400,000

SOURCES OF FUNDSCounty 245,000 195,000State PSCP 305,000 205,000

With the increase of the use of technology equipment in the classrooms additional branch electrical circuits and panelboards are needed to distribute electrical service throughout the classrooms. This will permit the installation of additional electrical outlets in the classrooms to serve the local loads created by the use of this equipment.

This project involves the upgrade of electrical service, replacement of aging distribution boards, installation of additional electrical branch circuits to accommodate the increasing use of technology, and the replacement of aging emergency generators.

FY16 - Westminster HighFY17 - Sykesville MiddleFY18 - West Middle (This project is included in Modernization project)

00

Total Project Cost

Engineering/Design 100,00000

850,000

510,000

950,000

440,000

34

Page 38: CAPITAL BUDGET FY 2013 · 2016. 6. 21. · Capital Budget Process ... FY 2013 Capital Budget Request ... update to the March 2008 Report on Physical and Functional Assessments of

Fire Alarm System Replacements

Project Description:

Project Justification:

BUDGET REQUEST FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18Prior

Allocation

Land AcquisitionSite WorkConstruction 125,000 130,000Equipment/FurnishingsOther

TOTAL 125,000 130,000

SOURCES OF FUNDSCounty 125,000 130,000State PSCP

This project involves the replacement of the fire alarm systems within the schools. This replacement includes the central alarm panel, annunciator panel, pull stations, smoke, heat and duct detectors, signaling devices and other peripheral devices.

FY14 - Westminster West Middle (This project is included as part of Modernization)FY15 - Hampstead ElementaryFY16 - Mt. Airy Elementary SchoolFY17 - Westminster East Middle (This project is included as part of Modernization)FY18 - Eldersburg (This project is included as part of Open Space Enclosures)

00

Total Project Cost

Engineering/Design 000

As the fire alarm systems at these schools continue to age it becomes increasing difficult to purchase replacement parts, make repairs and maintain communication between the components of the separate systems. These systems are approaching obsolescence and will require replacement to assure compliance with Life Safety Codes.

255,000

0

255,000

255,000

35

Page 39: CAPITAL BUDGET FY 2013 · 2016. 6. 21. · Capital Budget Process ... FY 2013 Capital Budget Request ... update to the March 2008 Report on Physical and Functional Assessments of

Window Replacements

Project Description:

Project Justification:

BUDGET REQUEST FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18Prior

Allocation50,000 100,000

Land AcquisitionSite WorkConstruction 250,000 500,000Equipment/FurnishingsOther

TOTAL 300,000 600,000

SOURCES OF FUNDSCounty 155,000 295,000State PSCP 145,000 305,000

Replacement of old single-pane windows is required to protect building structure and building components, to maintain good indoor air quality, and to improve the energy efficiency of these aging facilities. Without a window replacement program, the exterior building envelope will continue to be compromised. As a result, these failing windows will continue to waste energy and provide the conditions which could lead to air quality issues in the building.

750,000

450,000

900,000

450,000

These projects involve the replacement of windows that are beyond their life cycle and are exhibiting signs of approaching failure. Their replacement with modern energy efficient windows is necessary to protect building components and contents, and preserve the learning environment.

FY14 - Sykesville Middle FY15 - Westmisnter East Middle (Incorporated into East Middle Modernization request)FY16 - South Carroll High FY17 - Carroll County Career & Technology Center (Incorporated into New Career & Technology Center Project request)FY18 - Westminster High

00

Total Project Cost

Engineering/Design 150,00000

36

Page 40: CAPITAL BUDGET FY 2013 · 2016. 6. 21. · Capital Budget Process ... FY 2013 Capital Budget Request ... update to the March 2008 Report on Physical and Functional Assessments of

APPENDIX A - CCPS STUDENT F.T.E. ENROLLMENT ACTUAL FOR 1996 - 2010 AND PROJECTED FOR 2011-2020 - Special Special

Sept.30 Elementary K-5 Middle 6-8 High 9-12 School School Alternative Alternative Pre-K Pre-K PreK-12 PreK-12Enrollment Change Enrollment Change Enrollment Change Enrollment Change Ed. Ed.Change Ed. Change Enrollment Change

A 1996 11,573 6,032 7,251 49 105 118 25,128C 1997 11,794 221 6,223 191 7,563 312 46 -3 92 -13 72 -46 25,790 662T 1998 11,834 40 6,269 46 7,875 312 42 -4 99 7 84 12 26,203 413U 1999 11,791 -43 6,462 193 8,038 163 37 -5 97 -2 82 -2 26,507 304A 2000 11,479 -312 6,724 262 8,097 59 34 -3 108 11 96 14 26,538 31L 2001 11,560 81 6,941 217 8,389 292 38 4 97 -11 101 5 27,126 588

2002 11,431 -129 7,031 90 8,750 361 32 -6 92 -5 104 3 27,440 3142003 11,405 -26 7,010 -21 9,121 371 32 0 98 6 108 4 27,774 3342004 11,219 -186 6,971 -39 9,403 282 41 9 90 -8 105 -3 27,829 552005 11,351 132 6,888 -83 9,696 293 35 -6 104 14 120 15 28,194 3652006 11,514 163 6,687 -201 9,716 20 37 2 95 -9 133 13 28,182 -122007 11,688 174 6,506 -181 9,583 -133 47 10 94 -1 153 20 28,071 -1112008 11,653 -35 6,335 -171 9,431 -152 44 -3 89 -5 157 4 27,709 -3622009 11,655 -33 6,315 -191 9,250 -333 50 3 74 -20 142 -11 27,486 -5852010 11,678 25 6,125 -210 9,075 -356 45 1 61 -28 134 -23 27,118 -591

2010A 11,678 6,125 9,075 45 61 142 27,126P 2011 11,695 17 6,145 20 8,847 -228 45 0 61 0 160 18 26,953 -173R 2012 11,718 23 6,069 -76 8,688 -159 45 0 61 0 160 0 26,741 -212O 2013 11,569 -149 6,209 140 8,482 -206 45 0 61 0 160 0 26,526 -215J 2014 11,334 -235 6,198 -11 8,423 -59 45 0 61 0 160 0 26,221 -305E 2015 11,166 -168 6,250 52 8,424 1 45 0 61 0 160 0 26,106 -115C 2016 11,133 -33 6,165 -85 8,448 24 45 0 61 0 160 0 26,012 -94E 2017 11,110 -23 6,192 27 8,513 65 45 0 61 0 160 0 26,081 69D 2018 11,146 36 6,163 -29 8,550 37 45 0 61 0 160 0 26,125 44

2019 11,335 189 6,092 -71 8,550 0 45 0 61 0 160 0 26,243 1182020 11,739 404 5,818 -274 8,501 -49 45 0 61 0 160 0 26,324 81

Notes: 1 Enrollments are F.T.E. counts. All actual enrollments are September 30th official student enrollment count.2 "Change" column indicates change from prior year.3 Post Secondary and Flexible Student Support students are not included in totals

37

Page 41: CAPITAL BUDGET FY 2013 · 2016. 6. 21. · Capital Budget Process ... FY 2013 Capital Budget Request ... update to the March 2008 Report on Physical and Functional Assessments of

Carroll County Public Schools Actual & Projected EnrollmentEducational Facilities Master Plan - 2011-2020ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS Comparisons are based on total State Rated capacity with FTE

Enrollment Enrollment EnrollmentActual Projected Projected

School K-5 PreK Spec. Ed. Total 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020Carrolltowne 548 0 50 598 619 607 594 595 598 580 584 583 586 596 617

Over (Under) State Rated Capacity 21 9 (4) (3) - (18) (14) (15) (12) (2) 19 Percent of STATE Capacity 103.5% 101.5% 99.3% 99.5% 100.0% 97.0% 97.7% 97.5% 98.0% 99.7% 103.2%

Charles Carroll 320 0 0 320 325 318 306 311 309 307 305 304 305 310 320Over (Under) State Rated Capacity 5 (2) (14) (9) (11) (13) (15) (16) (15) (10) - Percent of STATE Capacity 101.6% 99.4% 95.6% 97.2% 96.6% 95.9% 95.3% 95.0% 95.3% 96.9% 100.0%

Cranberry Station 550 20 0 570 453 453 465 465 447 438 444 444 445 454 470Over (Under) State Rated Capacity (117) (117) (105) (105) (123) (132) (126) (126) (125) (116) (100) Percent of STATE Capacity 79.5% 79.5% 81.6% 81.6% 78.4% 76.8% 77.9% 77.9% 78.1% 79.6% 82.5%

Ebb Valley 571 20 0 591 492 476 483 465 455 442 443 441 442 449 466Over (Under) State Rated Capacity (99) (115) (108) (126) (136) (149) (148) (150) (149) (142) (125) Percent of STATE Capacity 83.2% 80.5% 81.7% 78.7% 77.0% 74.8% 75.0% 74.6% 74.8% 76.0% 78.8%

Eldersburg 570 0 0 570 517 527 509 501 489 491 494 493 495 504 521Over (Under) State Rated Capacity (53) (43) (61) (69) (81) (79) (76) (77) (75) (66) (49) Percent of STATE Capacity 90.7% 92.5% 89.3% 87.9% 85.8% 86.1% 86.7% 86.5% 86.8% 88.4% 91.4%

Elmer Wolfe 548 0 0 548 394 399 394 386 373 371 377 377 378 384 397Over (Under) State Rated Capacity (154) (149) (154) (162) (175) (177) (171) (171) (170) (164) (151) Percent of STATE Capacity 71.9% 72.8% 71.9% 70.4% 68.1% 67.7% 68.8% 68.8% 69.0% 70.1% 72.4%

Freedom 525 0 0 525 571 548 555 555 543 533 519 518 519 528 547Over (Under) State Rated Capacity 46 23 30 30 18 8 (6) (7) (6) 3 22 Percent of STATE Capacity 108.8% 104.4% 105.7% 105.7% 103.4% 101.5% 98.9% 98.7% 98.9% 100.6% 104.2%

Friendship Valley 527 0 0 527 475 475 493 484 463 456 455 454 456 463 479Over (Under) State Rated Capacity (52) (52) (34) (43) (64) (71) (72) (73) (71) (64) (48) Percent of STATE Capacity 90.1% 90.1% 93.5% 91.8% 87.9% 86.5% 86.3% 86.1% 86.5% 87.9% 90.9%

Hampstead 548 0 40 588 392 394 408 411 398 388 386 385 386 392 406Over (Under) State Rated Capacity (196) (194) (180) (177) (190) (200) (202) (203) (202) (196) (182) Percent of STATE Capacity 66.7% 67.0% 69.4% 69.9% 67.7% 66.0% 65.6% 65.5% 65.6% 66.7% 69.0%

Linton Springs 731 0 0 731 655 661 650 634 621 621 634 632 634 645 668Over (Under) State Rated Capacity (76) (70) (81) (97) (110) (110) (97) (99) (97) (86) (63) Percent of STATE Capacity 89.6% 90.4% 88.9% 86.7% 85.0% 85.0% 86.7% 86.5% 86.7% 88.2% 91.4%

Manchester 707 20 0 727 586 608 622 605 594 593 574 572 573 583 603Over (Under) State Rated Capacity (141) (119) (105) (122) (133) (134) (153) (155) (154) (144) (124) Percent of STATE Capacity 80.6% 83.6% 85.6% 83.2% 81.7% 81.6% 79.0% 78.7% 78.8% 80.2% 82.9%

Mechanicsville 616 0 0 616 567 595 601 600 573 564 561 560 562 571 591Over (Under) State Rated Capacity (49) (21) (15) (16) (43) (52) (55) (56) (54) (45) (25) Percent of STATE Capacity 92.0% 96.6% 97.6% 97.4% 93.0% 91.6% 91.1% 90.9% 91.2% 92.7% 95.9%

State Rated Capacity

38

Page 42: CAPITAL BUDGET FY 2013 · 2016. 6. 21. · Capital Budget Process ... FY 2013 Capital Budget Request ... update to the March 2008 Report on Physical and Functional Assessments of

Enrollment Enrollment EnrollmentActual Projected Projected

School K-5 PreK Spec. Ed. Total 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020State Rated Capacity

Mt. Airy 598 0 0 598 509 488 509 489 483 481 481 459 447 450 471(Grades 3-5) Over (Under) State Rated Capacity (89) (110) (89) (109) (115) (117) (117) (139) (151) (148) (127)

Percent of STATE Capacity 85.1% 81.6% 85.1% 81.8% 80.8% 80.4% 80.4% 76.8% 74.7% 75.3% 78.8%

Parr's Ridge 590 20 0 610 489 486 484 484 463 451 454 474 489 501 514(Grades K-2) Over (Under) State Rated Capacity (121) (124) (126) (126) (147) (159) (156) (136) (121) (109) (96)

Percent of STATE Capacity 80.2% 79.7% 79.3% 79.3% 75.9% 73.9% 74.4% 77.7% 80.2% 82.1% 84.3%

Piney Ridge 571 0 0 571 599 603 603 601 579 577 573 572 574 585 606Over (Under) State Rated Capacity 28 32 32 30 8 6 2 1 3 14 35 Percent of STATE Capacity 104.9% 105.6% 105.6% 105.3% 101.4% 101.1% 100.4% 100.2% 100.5% 102.5% 106.1%

Robert Moton 504 0 40 544 461 472 474 471 469 461 450 449 450 457 473Capacity Increase by 2 K, 1 PreK Rooms 2011

548 20 40 608Over (Under) State Rated Capacity (83) (136) (134) (137) (139) (147) (158) (159) (158) (151) (135) Percent of STATE Capacity 84.7% 77.6% 78.0% 77.5% 77.1% 75.8% 74.0% 73.8% 74.0% 75.2% 77.8%

Runnymede 594 20 40 654 544 550 549 522 539 516 522 520 521 530 549Over (Under) State Rated Capacity (110) (104) (105) (132) (115) (138) (132) (134) (133) (124) (105) Percent of STATE Capacity 83.2% 84.1% 83.9% 79.8% 82.4% 78.9% 79.8% 79.5% 79.7% 81.0% 83.9%

Sandymount 527 0 0 527 451 454 446 438 433 431 430 428 429 437 452Over (Under) State Rated Capacity (76) (73) (81) (89) (94) (96) (97) (99) (98) (90) (75) Percent of STATE Capacity 85.6% 86.1% 84.6% 83.1% 82.2% 81.8% 81.6% 81.2% 81.4% 82.9% 85.8%

Spring Garden 593 0 0 593 511 514 522 507 509 507 497 496 498 507 524Over (Under) State Rated Capacity (82) (79) (71) (86) (84) (86) (96) (97) (95) (86) (69) Percent of STATE Capacity 86.2% 86.7% 88.0% 85.5% 85.8% 85.5% 83.8% 83.6% 84.0% 85.5% 88.4%

Taneytown 550 20 0 570 429 440 438 428 426 426 420 421 423 431 446Over (Under) State Rated Capacity (141) (130) (132) (142) (144) (144) (150) (149) (147) (139) (124) Percent of STATE Capacity 75.3% 77.2% 76.8% 75.1% 74.7% 74.7% 73.7% 73.9% 74.2% 75.6% 78.2%

Westminster 570 0 0 570 547 539 531 542 525 514 513 513 515 523 542Over (Under) State Rated Capacity (23) (31) (39) (28) (45) (56) (57) (57) (55) (47) (28) Percent of STATE Capacity 96.0% 94.6% 93.2% 95.1% 92.1% 90.2% 90.0% 90.0% 90.4% 91.8% 95.1%

Wm. Winchester 571 20 0 591 601 615 617 625 602 591 582 581 582 591 612Over (Under) State Rated Capacity 10 24 26 34 11 - (9) (10) (9) - 21 Percent of STATE Capacity 101.7% 104.1% 104.4% 105.8% 101.9% 100.0% 98.5% 98.3% 98.5% 100.0% 103.6%

Winfield 731 0 40 771 628 631 625 610 603 587 595 593 595 605 626Over (Under) State Rated Capacity (143) (140) (146) (161) (168) (184) (176) (178) (176) (166) (145) Percent of STATE Capacity 81.5% 81.8% 81.1% 79.1% 78.2% 76.1% 77.2% 76.9% 77.2% 78.5% 81.2%

TOTALS 13160 140 210 13510 11815 11853 11878 11729 11494 11326 11293 11269 11304 11496 11900

2011-'12 Capacity 13204 160 210 13574Over (Under) State Rated Capacity (1,695) (1,721) (1,696) (1,845) (2,080) (2,248) (2,281) (2,305) (2,270) (2,078) (1,674) Percent of STATE Capacity 87.5% 87.3% 87.5% 86.4% 84.7% 83.4% 83.2% 83.0% 83.3% 84.7% 87.7%

39

Page 43: CAPITAL BUDGET FY 2013 · 2016. 6. 21. · Capital Budget Process ... FY 2013 Capital Budget Request ... update to the March 2008 Report on Physical and Functional Assessments of

Carroll County Public Schools Actual & Projected EnrollmentEducational Facilities Master Plan - 2011-2020ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS Northeast Area Schools

Enrollment Enrollment EnrollmentActual Projected Projected

School K-5 PreK Spec. Ed. Total 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020Ebb Valley 571 20 0 591 492 476 483 465 455 442 443 441 442 449 466

Over (Under) State Rated Capacity (99) (115) (108) (126) (136) (149) (148) (150) (149) (142) (125) Percent of STATE Capacity 83.2% 80.5% 81.7% 78.7% 77.0% 74.8% 75.0% 74.6% 74.8% 76.0% 78.8%

Hampstead 548 0 40 588 392 394 408 411 398 388 386 385 386 392 406Over (Under) State Rated Capacity (196) (194) (180) (177) (190) (200) (202) (203) (202) (196) (182) Percent of STATE Capacity 66.7% 67.0% 69.4% 69.9% 67.7% 66.0% 65.6% 65.5% 65.6% 66.7% 69.0%

Manchester 707 20 0 727 586 608 622 605 594 593 574 572 573 583 603Over (Under) State Rated Capacity (141) (119) (105) (122) (133) (134) (153) (155) (154) (144) (124) Percent of STATE Capacity 80.6% 83.6% 85.6% 83.2% 81.7% 81.6% 79.0% 78.7% 78.8% 80.2% 82.9%

Spring Garden 593 0 0 593 511 514 522 507 509 507 497 496 498 507 524Over (Under) State Rated Capacity (82) (79) (71) (86) (84) (86) (96) (97) (95) (86) (69) Percent of STATE Capacity 86.2% 86.7% 88.0% 85.5% 85.8% 85.5% 83.8% 83.6% 84.0% 85.5% 88.4%

TOTALS 2419 40 40 2499 1981 1992 2035 1988 1956 1930 1900 1894 1899 1931 1999

Over (Under) State Rated Capacity (518) (507) (464) (511) (543) (569) (599) (605) (600) (568) (500) Percent of STATE Capacity 79.3% 79.7% 81.4% 79.6% 78.3% 77.2% 76.0% 75.8% 76.0% 77.3% 80.0%

Comparisons are based on total State Rated capacity with FTE

State Rated Capacity

40

Page 44: CAPITAL BUDGET FY 2013 · 2016. 6. 21. · Capital Budget Process ... FY 2013 Capital Budget Request ... update to the March 2008 Report on Physical and Functional Assessments of

Carroll County Public Schools Actual & Projected EnrollmentEducational Facilities Master Plan - 2011-2020ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS Northwest Area

Enrollment Enrollment EnrollmentActual Projected Projected

School K-5 PreK Spec. Ed. Total 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020Elmer Wolfe 548 0 0 548 394 399 394 386 373 371 377 377 378 384 397

Over (Under) State Rated Capacity (154) (149) (154) (162) (175) (177) (171) (171) (170) (164) (151) Percent of STATE Capacity 71.9% 72.8% 71.9% 70.4% 68.1% 67.7% 68.8% 68.8% 69.0% 70.1% 72.4%

Runnymede 594 20 40 654 544 550 549 522 539 516 522 520 521 530 549Over (Under) State Rated Capacity (110) (104) (105) (132) (115) (138) (132) (134) (133) (124) (105) Percent of STATE Capacity 83.2% 84.1% 83.9% 79.8% 82.4% 78.9% 79.8% 79.5% 79.7% 81.0% 83.9%

Taneytown 550 20 0 570 429 440 438 428 426 426 420 421 423 431 446Over (Under) State Rated Capacity (141) (130) (132) (142) (144) (144) (150) (149) (147) (139) (124) Percent of STATE Capacity 75.3% 77.2% 76.8% 75.1% 74.7% 74.7% 73.7% 73.9% 74.2% 75.6% 78.2%

TOTALS 1692 40 40 1772 1367 1389 1381 1336 1338 1313 1319 1318 1322 1345 1392

Over (Under) State Rated Capacity (405) (383) (391) (436) (434) (459) (453) (454) (450) (427) (380) Percent of STATE Capacity 77.1% 78.4% 77.9% 75.4% 75.5% 74.1% 74.4% 74.4% 74.6% 75.9% 78.6%

Comparisons are based on total State Rated capacity with FTE

State Rated Capacity

41

Page 45: CAPITAL BUDGET FY 2013 · 2016. 6. 21. · Capital Budget Process ... FY 2013 Capital Budget Request ... update to the March 2008 Report on Physical and Functional Assessments of

Carroll County Public Schools Actual & Projected EnrollmentEducational Facilities Master Plan - 2011-2020ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS Westminster Area Schools

Enrollment Enrollment EnrollmentActual Projected Projected

School K-5 PreK Spec. Ed. Total 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020Charles Carroll 320 0 0 320 325 318 306 311 309 307 305 304 305 310 320

Over (Under) State Rated Capacity 5 (2) (14) (9) (11) (13) (15) (16) (15) (10) - Percent of STATE Capacity 101.6% 99.4% 95.6% 97.2% 96.6% 95.9% 95.3% 95.0% 95.3% 96.9% 100.0%

Cranberry Station 550 20 0 570 453 453 465 465 447 438 444 444 445 454 470Over (Under) State Rated Capacity (117) (117) (105) (105) (123) (132) (126) (126) (125) (116) (100) Percent of STATE Capacity 79.5% 79.5% 81.6% 81.6% 78.4% 76.8% 77.9% 77.9% 78.1% 79.6% 82.5%

Friendship Valley 527 0 0 527 475 475 493 484 463 456 455 454 456 463 479Over (Under) State Rated Capacity (52) (52) (34) (43) (64) (71) (72) (73) (71) (64) (48) Percent of STATE Capacity 90.1% 90.1% 93.5% 91.8% 87.9% 86.5% 86.3% 86.1% 86.5% 87.9% 90.9%

Mechanicsville 616 0 0 616 567 595 601 600 573 564 561 560 562 571 591Over (Under) State Rated Capacity (49) (21) (15) (16) (43) (52) (55) (56) (54) (45) (25) Percent of STATE Capacity 92.0% 96.6% 97.6% 97.4% 93.0% 91.6% 91.1% 90.9% 91.2% 92.7% 95.9%

Robert Moton 504 0 40 544 461 472 474 471 469 461 450 449 450 457 473Capacity Increase by 2 K, 1 PreK Rooms 2011

548 20 40 608Over (Under) State Rated Capacity (83) (136) (134) (137) (139) (147) (158) (159) (158) (151) (135) Percent of STATE Capacity 84.7% 77.6% 78.0% 77.5% 77.1% 75.8% 74.0% 73.8% 74.0% 75.2% 77.8%

Sandymount 527 0 0 527 451 454 446 438 433 431 430 428 429 437 452Over (Under) State Rated Capacity (76) (73) (81) (89) (94) (96) (97) (99) (98) (90) (75) Percent of STATE Capacity 85.6% 86.1% 84.6% 83.1% 82.2% 81.8% 81.6% 81.2% 81.4% 82.9% 85.8%

Westminster 570 0 0 570 547 539 531 542 525 514 513 513 515 523 542Over (Under) State Rated Capacity (23) (31) (39) (28) (45) (56) (57) (57) (55) (47) (28) Percent of STATE Capacity 96.0% 94.6% 93.2% 95.1% 92.1% 90.2% 90.0% 90.0% 90.4% 91.8% 95.1%

Wm. Winchester 571 20 0 591 601 615 617 625 602 591 582 581 582 591 612Over (Under) State Rated Capacity 10 24 26 34 11 - (9) (10) (9) - 21 Percent of STATE Capacity 101.7% 104.1% 104.4% 105.8% 101.9% 100.0% 98.5% 98.3% 98.5% 100.0% 103.6%

TOTALS 4185 40 40 4265 3880 3921 3933 3936 3821 3762 3740 3733 3744 3806 3939

2011-'12 Capacity 4229 60 40 4329Over (Under) State Rated Capacity (385) (408) (396) (393) (508) (567) (589) (596) (585) (523) (390) Percent of STATE Capacity 91.0% 90.6% 90.9% 90.9% 88.3% 86.9% 86.4% 86.2% 86.5% 87.9% 91.0%

Comparisons are based on total State Rated capacity with FTE

State Rated Capacity

42

Page 46: CAPITAL BUDGET FY 2013 · 2016. 6. 21. · Capital Budget Process ... FY 2013 Capital Budget Request ... update to the March 2008 Report on Physical and Functional Assessments of

Carroll County Public Schools Actual & Projected EnrollmentEducational Facilities Master Plan - 2011-2020ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS Southeast Area Schools

Enrollment Enrollment EnrollmentActual Projected Projected

School K-5 PreK Spec. Ed. Total 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020Carrolltowne 548 0 50 598 619 607 594 595 598 580 584 583 586 596 617

Over (Under) State Rated Capacity 21 9 (4) (3) - (18) (14) (15) (12) (2) 19 Percent of STATE Capacity 103.5% 101.5% 99.3% 99.5% 100.0% 97.0% 97.7% 97.5% 98.0% 99.7% 103.2%

Eldersburg 570 0 0 570 517 527 509 501 489 491 494 493 495 504 521Over (Under) State Rated Capacity (53) (43) (61) (69) (81) (79) (76) (77) (75) (66) (49) Percent of STATE Capacity 90.7% 92.5% 89.3% 87.9% 85.8% 86.1% 86.7% 86.5% 86.8% 88.4% 91.4%

Freedom 525 0 0 525 571 548 555 555 543 533 519 518 519 528 547Over (Under) State Rated Capacity 46 23 30 30 18 8 (6) (7) (6) 3 22 Percent of STATE Capacity 108.8% 104.4% 105.7% 105.7% 103.4% 101.5% 98.9% 98.7% 98.9% 100.6% 104.2%

Linton Springs 731 0 0 731 655 661 650 634 621 621 634 632 634 645 668Over (Under) State Rated Capacity (76) (70) (81) (97) (110) (110) (97) (99) (97) (86) (63) Percent of STATE Capacity 89.6% 90.4% 88.9% 86.7% 85.0% 85.0% 86.7% 86.5% 86.7% 88.2% 91.4%

Piney Ridge 571 0 0 571 599 603 603 601 579 577 573 572 574 585 606Over (Under) State Rated Capacity 28 32 32 30 8 6 2 1 3 14 35 Percent of STATE Capacity 104.9% 105.6% 105.6% 105.3% 101.4% 101.1% 100.4% 100.2% 100.5% 102.5% 106.1%

TOTALS 2945 0 50 2995 2961 2946 2911 2886 2830 2802 2804 2798 2808 2858 2959

Over (Under) State Rated Capacity (34) (49) (84) (109) (165) (193) (191) (197) (187) (137) (36) Percent of STATE Capacity 98.9% 98.4% 97.2% 96.4% 94.5% 93.6% 93.6% 93.4% 93.8% 95.4% 98.8%

Comparisons are based on total State Rated capacity with FTE

State Rated Capacity

43

Page 47: CAPITAL BUDGET FY 2013 · 2016. 6. 21. · Capital Budget Process ... FY 2013 Capital Budget Request ... update to the March 2008 Report on Physical and Functional Assessments of

Carroll County Public Schools Actual & Projected EnrollmentEducational Facilities Master Plan - 2011-2020ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS Southwest Area Schools

Enrollment Enrollment EnrollmentActual Projected Projected

School K-5 PreK Spec. Ed. Total 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020Mt. Airy 598 0 0 598 509 488 509 489 483 481 481 459 447 450 471

Over (Under) State Rated Capacity (89) (110) (89) (109) (115) (117) (117) (139) (151) (148) (127) Percent of STATE Capacity 85.1% 81.6% 85.1% 81.8% 80.8% 80.4% 80.4% 76.8% 74.7% 75.3% 78.8%

Parr's Ridge 590 20 0 610 489 486 484 484 463 451 454 474 489 501 514Over (Under) State Rated Capacity (121) (124) (126) (126) (147) (159) (156) (136) (121) (109) (96) Percent of STATE Capacity 80.2% 79.7% 79.3% 79.3% 75.9% 73.9% 74.4% 77.7% 80.2% 82.1% 84.3%

Winfield 731 0 40 771 628 631 625 610 603 587 595 593 595 605 626Over (Under) State Rated Capacity (143) (140) (146) (161) (168) (184) (176) (178) (176) (166) (145) Percent of STATE Capacity 81.5% 81.8% 81.1% 79.1% 78.2% 76.1% 77.2% 76.9% 77.2% 78.5% 81.2%

TOTALS 1919 20 40 1979 1626 1605 1618 1583 1549 1519 1530 1526 1531 1556 1611

Over (Under) State Rated Capacity (353) (374) (361) (396) (430) (460) (449) (453) (448) (423) (368) Percent of STATE Capacity 82.2% 81.1% 81.8% 80.0% 78.3% 76.8% 77.3% 77.1% 77.4% 78.6% 81.4%

Comparisons are based on total State Rated capacity with FTE

State Rated Capacity

44

Page 48: CAPITAL BUDGET FY 2013 · 2016. 6. 21. · Capital Budget Process ... FY 2013 Capital Budget Request ... update to the March 2008 Report on Physical and Functional Assessments of

Carroll County Public Schools Actual & Projected EnrollmentEducational Facilities Master Plan - 2011-2020MIDDLE SCHOOLS

Enrollment Enrollment EnrollmentActual Projected Projected

School 6-8 Spec Ed 6-8 Spec Ed 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020Mt. Airy 638 10 500 10 594 624 617 632 602 627 591 589 585 587 561

Over (Under) State Rated Capacity (54) (24) (31) (16) (46) (21) (57) (59) (63) (61) (87) Percent of STATE Capacity 91.7% 96.3% 95.2% 97.5% 92.9% 96.8% 91.2% 90.9% 90.3% 90.6% 86.6%Over (Under) Functional Capacity 84 114 107 122 92 117 81 79 75 77 51 Percent of Functional Capacity 116.5% 122.4% 121.0% 123.9% 118.0% 122.9% 115.9% 115.5% 114.7% 115.1% 110.0%

New Windsor 638 10 500 10 404 375 370 388 397 391 369 369 367 374 358Over (Under) State Rated Capacity (244) (273) (278) (260) (251) (257) (279) (279) (281) (274) (290) Percent of STATE Capacity 62.3% 57.9% 57.1% 59.9% 61.3% 60.3% 56.9% 56.9% 56.6% 57.7% 55.2%Over (Under) Functional Capacity (106) (135) (140) (122) (113) (119) (141) (141) (143) (136) (152) Percent of Functional Capacity 79.2% 73.5% 72.5% 76.1% 77.8% 76.7% 72.4% 72.4% 72.0% 73.3% 70.2%

North Carroll 893 20 750 20 621 607 589 622 621 637 626 631 631 609 581Over (Under) State Rated Capacity (292) (306) (324) (291) (292) (276) (287) (282) (282) (304) (332) Percent of STATE Capacity 68.0% 66.5% 64.5% 68.1% 68.0% 69.8% 68.6% 69.1% 69.1% 66.7% 63.6%Over (Under) Functional Capacity (149) (163) (181) (148) (149) (133) (144) (139) (139) (161) (189) Percent of Functional Capacity 80.6% 78.8% 76.5% 80.8% 80.6% 82.7% 81.3% 81.9% 81.9% 79.1% 75.5%

Northwest 893 20 750 20 524 537 492 506 486 491 457 490 480 478 456Over (Under) State Rated Capacity (389) (376) (421) (407) (427) (422) (456) (423) (433) (435) (457) Percent of STATE Capacity 57.4% 58.8% 53.9% 55.4% 53.2% 53.8% 50.1% 53.7% 52.6% 52.4% 49.9%Over (Under) Functional Capacity (246) (233) (278) (264) (284) (279) (313) (280) (290) (292) (314) Percent of Functional Capacity 68.1% 69.7% 63.9% 65.7% 63.1% 63.8% 59.4% 63.6% 62.3% 62.1% 59.2%

Oklahoma Road 914 20 825 20 732 780 808 828 771 763 766 787 778 763 730Over (Under) State Rated Capacity (202) (154) (126) (106) (163) (171) (168) (147) (156) (171) (204) Percent of STATE Capacity 78.4% 83.5% 86.5% 88.7% 82.5% 81.7% 82.0% 84.3% 83.3% 81.7% 78.2%Over (Under) Functional Capacity (113) (65) (37) (17) (74) (82) (79) (58) (67) (82) (115) Percent of Functional Capacity 86.6% 92.3% 95.6% 98.0% 91.2% 90.3% 90.7% 93.1% 92.1% 90.3% 86.4%

Shiloh 914 20 825 20 670 685 651 683 673 689 681 691 692 675 644Over (Under) State Rated Capacity (264) (249) (283) (251) (261) (245) (253) (243) (242) (259) (290) Percent of STATE Capacity 71.7% 73.3% 69.7% 73.1% 72.1% 73.8% 72.9% 74.0% 74.1% 72.3% 69.0%Over (Under) Functional Capacity (175) (160) (194) (162) (172) (156) (164) (154) (153) (170) (201) Percent of Functional Capacity 79.3% 81.1% 77.0% 80.8% 79.6% 81.5% 80.6% 81.8% 81.9% 79.9% 76.2%

Sykesville 850 20 725 20 822 773 775 790 814 781 760 760 772 779 742Over (Under) State Rated Capacity (48) (97) (95) (80) (56) (89) (110) (110) (98) (91) (128) Percent of STATE Capacity 94.5% 88.9% 89.1% 90.8% 93.6% 89.8% 87.4% 87.4% 88.7% 89.5% 85.3%Over (Under) Functional Capacity 77 28 30 45 69 36 15 15 27 34 (3) Percent of Functional Capacity 110.3% 103.8% 104.0% 106.0% 109.3% 104.8% 102.0% 102.0% 103.6% 104.6% 99.6%

CapacityState Rated Functional

45

Page 49: CAPITAL BUDGET FY 2013 · 2016. 6. 21. · Capital Budget Process ... FY 2013 Capital Budget Request ... update to the March 2008 Report on Physical and Functional Assessments of

Carroll County Public Schools Actual & Projected EnrollmentEducational Facilities Master Plan - 2011-2020MIDDLE SCHOOLS

Enrollment Enrollment EnrollmentActual Projected Projected

School 6-8 Spec Ed 6-8 Spec Ed 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

CapacityState Rated Functional

Westminster East 829 40 750 40 716 750 796 807 821 838 866 857 844 830 794Over (Under) State Rated Capacity (153) (119) (73) (62) (48) (31) (3) (12) (25) (39) (75) Percent of STATE Capacity 82.4% 86.3% 91.6% 92.9% 94.5% 96.4% 99.7% 98.6% 97.1% 95.5% 91.4%Over (Under) Functional Capacity (74) (40) 6 17 31 48 76 67 54 40 4 Percent of Functional Capacity 90.6% 94.9% 100.8% 102.2% 103.9% 106.1% 109.6% 108.5% 106.8% 105.1% 100.5%

Westminster West 1126 20 1025 20 1043 1016 972 954 1014 1034 1048 1018 1014 998 953Over (Under) State Rated Capacity (103) (130) (174) (192) (132) (112) (98) (128) (132) (148) (193) Percent of STATE Capacity 91.0% 88.7% 84.8% 83.2% 88.5% 90.2% 91.4% 88.8% 88.5% 87.1% 83.2%Over (Under) Functional Capacity (2) (29) (73) (91) (31) (11) 3 (27) (31) (47) (92) Percent of Functional Capacity 99.8% 97.2% 93.0% 91.3% 97.0% 98.9% 100.3% 97.4% 97.0% 95.5% 91.2%

TOTALS 7695 180 6650 180 6126 6147 6070 6210 6199 6251 6164 6192 6163 6093 5819Over (Under) State Rated Capacity (1,749) (1,728) (1,805) (1,665) (1,676) (1,624) (1,711) (1,683) (1,712) (1,782) (2,056) Percent of STATE Capacity 77.8% 78.1% 77.1% 78.9% 78.7% 79.4% 78.3% 78.6% 78.3% 77.4% 73.9%Over (Under) Functional Capacity (704) (683) (760) (620) (631) (579) (666) (638) (667) (737) (1,011) Percent of Functional Capacity 89.7% 90.0% 88.9% 90.9% 90.8% 91.5% 90.2% 90.7% 90.2% 89.2% 85.2%

46

Page 50: CAPITAL BUDGET FY 2013 · 2016. 6. 21. · Capital Budget Process ... FY 2013 Capital Budget Request ... update to the March 2008 Report on Physical and Functional Assessments of

Carroll County Public Schools Actual & Projected EnrollmentEducational Facilities Master Plan - 2011-2020MIDDLE SCHOOLSSouthern Area

Enrollment Enrollment EnrollmentActual Projected Projected

School 6-8 Spec Ed 6-8 Spec Ed 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020Mt. Airy 638 10 500 10 594 624 617 632 602 627 591 589 585 587 561

Over (Under) State Rated Capacity (54) (24) (31) (16) (46) (21) (57) (59) (63) (61) (87) Percent of STATE Capacity 91.7% 96.3% 95.2% 97.5% 92.9% 96.8% 91.2% 90.9% 90.3% 90.6% 86.6%Over (Under) Functional Capacity 84 114 107 122 92 117 81 79 75 77 51 Percent of Functional Capacity 116.5% 122.4% 121.0% 123.9% 118.0% 122.9% 115.9% 115.5% 114.7% 115.1% 110.0%

Oklahoma Road 914 20 825 20 732 780 808 828 771 763 766 787 778 763 730 Over (Under) State Rated Capacity (202) (154) (126) (106) (163) (171) (168) (147) (156) (171) (204) Percent of STATE Capacity 78.4% 83.5% 86.5% 88.7% 82.5% 81.7% 82.0% 84.3% 83.3% 81.7% 78.2%Over (Under) Functional Capacity (113) (65) (37) (17) (74) (82) (79) (58) (67) (82) (115) Percent of Functional Capacity 86.6% 92.3% 95.6% 98.0% 91.2% 90.3% 90.7% 93.1% 92.1% 90.3% 86.4%

Sykesville 850 20 725 20 822 773 775 790 814 781 760 760 772 779 742 Over (Under) State Rated Capacity (48) (97) (95) (80) (56) (89) (110) (110) (98) (91) (128) Percent of STATE Capacity 94.5% 88.9% 89.1% 90.8% 93.6% 89.8% 87.4% 87.4% 88.7% 89.5% 85.3%Over (Under) Functional Capacity 77 28 30 45 69 36 15 15 27 34 (3) Percent of Functional Capacity 110.3% 103.8% 104.0% 106.0% 109.3% 104.8% 102.0% 102.0% 103.6% 104.6% 99.6%

TOTALS 2402 50 2050 50 2148 2177 2200 2250 2187 2171 2117 2136 2135 2129 2033Over (Under) State Rated Capacity (304) (275) (252) (202) (265) (281) (335) (316) (317) (323) (419) Percent of STATE Capacity 87.6% 88.8% 89.7% 91.8% 89.2% 88.5% 86.3% 87.1% 87.1% 86.8% 82.9%Over (Under) Functional Capacity 48 77 100 150 87 71 17 36 35 29 (67) Percent of Functional Capacity 102.3% 103.7% 104.8% 107.1% 104.1% 103.4% 100.8% 101.7% 101.7% 101.4% 96.8%

CapacityState Rated Functional

47

Page 51: CAPITAL BUDGET FY 2013 · 2016. 6. 21. · Capital Budget Process ... FY 2013 Capital Budget Request ... update to the March 2008 Report on Physical and Functional Assessments of

Carroll County Public Schools Actual & Projected EnrollmentEducational Facilities Master Plan - 2011-2020MIDDLE SCHOOLSWestminster Area

Enrollment Enrollment EnrollmentActual Projected Projected

School 6-8 Spec Ed 6-8 Spec Ed 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020Westminster East 829 40 750 40 716 750 796 807 821 838 866 857 844 830 794

Over (Under) State Rated Capacity (153) (119) (73) (62) (48) (31) (3) (12) (25) (39) (75) Percent of STATE Capacity 82.4% 86.3% 91.6% 92.9% 94.5% 96.4% 99.7% 98.6% 97.1% 95.5% 91.4%Over (Under) Functional Capacity (74) (40) 6 17 31 48 76 67 54 40 4 Percent of Functional Capacity 90.6% 94.9% 100.8% 102.2% 103.9% 106.1% 109.6% 108.5% 106.8% 105.1% 100.5%

Westminster West 1126 20 1025 20 1,043 1,016 972 954 1,014 1,034 1,048 1,018 1,014 998 953 Over (Under) State Rated Capacity (103) (130) (174) (192) (132) (112) (98) (128) (132) (148) (193) Percent of STATE Capacity 91.0% 88.7% 84.8% 83.2% 88.5% 90.2% 91.4% 88.8% 88.5% 87.1% 83.2%Over (Under) Functional Capacity (2) (29) (73) (91) (31) (11) 3 (27) (31) (47) (92) Percent of Functional Capacity 99.8% 97.2% 93.0% 91.3% 97.0% 98.9% 100.3% 97.4% 97.0% 95.5% 91.2%

TOTALS 1955 60 1775 60 1,759 1,766 1,768 1,761 1,835 1,872 1,914 1,875 1,858 1,828 1,747 Over (Under) State Rated Capacity (256) (249) (247) (254) (180) (143) (101) (140) (157) (187) (268) Percent of STATE Capacity 87.3% 87.6% 87.7% 87.4% 91.1% 92.9% 95.0% 93.1% 92.2% 90.7% 86.7%Over (Under) Functional Capacity (76) (69) (67) (74) - 37 79 40 23 (7) (88) Percent of Functional Capacity 95.9% 96.2% 96.3% 96.0% 100.0% 102.0% 104.3% 102.2% 101.3% 99.6% 95.2%

CapacityState Rated Functional

48

Page 52: CAPITAL BUDGET FY 2013 · 2016. 6. 21. · Capital Budget Process ... FY 2013 Capital Budget Request ... update to the March 2008 Report on Physical and Functional Assessments of

Carroll County Public Schools Actual & Projected EnrollmentEducational Facilities Master Plan - 2011-2020MIDDLE SCHOOLSSouthcentral/west

Enrollment Enrollment EnrollmentActual Projected Projected

School 6-8 Spec Ed 6-8 Spec Ed 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020New Windsor 638 10 500 10 404 375 370 388 397 391 369 369 367 374 358

Over (Under) State Rated Capacity (244) (273) (278) (260) (251) (257) (279) (279) (281) (274) (290) Percent of STATE Capacity 62.3% 57.9% 57.1% 59.9% 61.3% 60.3% 56.9% 56.9% 56.6% 57.7% 55.2%Over (Under) Functional Capacity (106) (135) (140) (122) (113) (119) (141) (141) (143) (136) (152) Percent of Functional Capacity 79.2% 73.5% 72.5% 76.1% 77.8% 76.7% 72.4% 72.4% 72.0% 73.3% 70.2%

Mt. Airy 638 10 500 10 594 624 617 632 602 627 591 589 585 587 561 Over (Under) State Rated Capacity (54) (24) (31) (16) (46) (21) (57) (59) (63) (61) (87) Percent of STATE Capacity 91.7% 96.3% 95.2% 97.5% 92.9% 96.8% 91.2% 90.9% 90.3% 90.6% 86.6%Over (Under) Functional Capacity 84 114 107 122 92 117 81 79 75 77 51 Percent of Functional Capacity 116.5% 122.4% 121.0% 123.9% 118.0% 122.9% 115.9% 115.5% 114.7% 115.1% 110.0%

Sykesville 850 20 725 20 822 773 775 790 814 781 760 760 772 779 742 Over (Under) State Rated Capacity (48) (97) (95) (80) (56) (89) (110) (110) (98) (91) (128) Percent of STATE Capacity 94.5% 88.9% 89.1% 90.8% 93.6% 89.8% 87.4% 87.4% 88.7% 89.5% 85.3%Over (Under) Functional Capacity 77 28 30 45 69 36 15 15 27 34 (3) Percent of Functional Capacity 110.3% 103.8% 104.0% 106.0% 109.3% 104.8% 102.0% 102.0% 103.6% 104.6% 99.6%

TOTALS 2126 40 1725 40 1820 1,772 1762 1810 1813 1799 1720 1718 1724 1740 1,661 Over (Under) State Rated Capacity (346) (394) (404) (356) (353) (367) (446) (448) (442) (426) (505) Percent of STATE Capacity 84.0% 81.8% 81.3% 83.6% 83.7% 83.1% 79.4% 79.3% 79.6% 80.3% 76.7%Over (Under) Functional Capacity 55 7 (3) 45 48 34 (45) (47) (41) (25) (104) Percent of Functional Capacity 103.1% 100.4% 99.8% 102.5% 102.7% 101.9% 97.5% 97.3% 97.7% 98.6% 94.1%

CapacityState Rated Functional

49

Page 53: CAPITAL BUDGET FY 2013 · 2016. 6. 21. · Capital Budget Process ... FY 2013 Capital Budget Request ... update to the March 2008 Report on Physical and Functional Assessments of

Carroll County Public Schools Actual & Projected EnrollmentEducational Facilities Master Plan - 2011-2020MIDDLE SCHOOLSNortheast

Enrollment Enrollment EnrollmentActual Projected Projected

School 6-8 Spec Ed 6-8 Spec Ed 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020North Carroll 893 20 750 20 621 607 589 622 621 637 626 631 631 609 581

Over (Under) State Rated Capacity (292) (306) (324) (291) (292) (276) (287) (282) (282) (304) (332) Percent of STATE Capacity 68.0% 66.5% 64.5% 68.1% 68.0% 69.8% 68.6% 69.1% 69.1% 66.7% 63.6%Over (Under) Functional Capacity (149) (163) (181) (148) (149) (133) (144) (139) (139) (161) (189) Percent of Functional Capacity 80.6% 78.8% 76.5% 80.8% 80.6% 82.7% 81.3% 81.9% 81.9% 79.1% 75.5%

Shiloh 914 20 825 20 670 685 651 683 673 689 681 691 692 675 644 Over (Under) State Rated Capacity (264) (249) (283) (251) (261) (245) (253) (243) (242) (259) (290) Percent of STATE Capacity 71.7% 73.3% 69.7% 73.1% 72.1% 73.8% 72.9% 74.0% 74.1% 72.3% 69.0%Over (Under) Functional Capacity (175) (160) (194) (162) (172) (156) (164) (154) (153) (170) (201) Percent of Functional Capacity 79.3% 81.1% 77.0% 80.8% 79.6% 81.5% 80.6% 81.8% 81.9% 79.9% 76.2%

TOTALS 1807 40 1575 40 1,291 1,292 1,240 1,305 1,294 1,326 1,307 1,322 1,323 1,284 1,225 Over (Under) State Rated Capacity (556) (555) (607) (542) (553) (521) (540) (525) (524) (563) (622) Percent of STATE Capacity 69.9% 70.0% 67.1% 70.7% 70.1% 71.8% 70.8% 71.6% 71.6% 69.5% 66.3%Over (Under) Functional Capacity (324) (323) (375) (310) (321) (289) (308) (293) (292) (331) (390) Percent of Functional Capacity 79.9% 80.0% 76.8% 80.8% 80.1% 82.1% 80.9% 81.9% 81.9% 79.5% 75.9%

CapacityState Rated Functional

50

Page 54: CAPITAL BUDGET FY 2013 · 2016. 6. 21. · Capital Budget Process ... FY 2013 Capital Budget Request ... update to the March 2008 Report on Physical and Functional Assessments of

Carroll County Public Schools Actual & Projected EnrollmentEducational Facilities Master Plan - 2011-2020MIDDLE SCHOOLSWestern Area

Enrollment Enrollment EnrollmentActual Projected Projected

School 6-8 Spec Ed 6-8 Spec Ed 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

New Windsor 638 10 500 10 404 375 370 388 397 391 369 369 367 374 358 Over (Under) State Rated Capacity (244) (273) (278) (260) (251) (257) (279) (279) (281) (274) (290) Percent of STATE Capacity 62.3% 57.9% 57.1% 59.9% 61.3% 60.3% 56.9% 56.9% 56.6% 57.7% 55.2%Over (Under) Functional Capacity (106) (135) (140) (122) (113) (119) (141) (141) (143) (136) (152) Percent of Functional Capacity 79.2% 73.5% 72.5% 76.1% 77.8% 76.7% 72.4% 72.4% 72.0% 73.3% 70.2%

Northwest 893 20 750 20 524 537 492 506 486 491 457 490 480 478 456 Over (Under) State Rated Capacity (389) (376) (421) (407) (427) (422) (456) (423) (433) (435) (457) Percent of STATE Capacity 57.4% 58.8% 53.9% 55.4% 53.2% 53.8% 50.1% 53.7% 52.6% 52.4% 49.9%Over (Under) Functional Capacity (246) (233) (278) (264) (284) (279) (313) (280) (290) (292) (314) Percent of Functional Capacity 68.1% 69.7% 63.9% 65.7% 63.1% 63.8% 59.4% 63.6% 62.3% 62.1% 59.2%

TOTALS 1531 30 1250 30 928 912 862 894 883 882 826 859 847 852 814 Over (Under) State Rated Capacity (633) (649) (699) (667) (678) (679) (735) (702) (714) (709) (747) Percent of STATE Capacity 59.4% 58.4% 55.2% 57.3% 56.6% 56.5% 52.9% 55.0% 54.3% 54.6% 52.1%Over (Under) Functional Capacity (352) (368) (418) (386) (397) (398) (454) (421) (433) (428) (466) Percent of Functional Capacity 72.5% 71.3% 67.3% 69.8% 69.0% 68.9% 64.5% 67.1% 66.2% 66.6% 63.6%

CapacityState Rated Functional

51

Page 55: CAPITAL BUDGET FY 2013 · 2016. 6. 21. · Capital Budget Process ... FY 2013 Capital Budget Request ... update to the March 2008 Report on Physical and Functional Assessments of

Carroll County Public Schools Actual & Projected EnrollmentEducational Facilities Master Plan - 2011-2020HIGH SCHOOLS

Enrollment Enrollment EnrollmentActual Projected Projected

School 9-12 Spec Ed Total 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020Century 1190 50 1240 1236 1209 1171 1122 1087 1081 1063 1080 1088 1047 1049

(4) (31) (69) (118) (153) (159) (177) (160) (152) (193) (191) 99.7% 97.5% 94.4% 90.5% 87.7% 87.2% 85.7% 87.1% 87.7% 84.4% 84.6%

Francis Scott Key 1254 50 1304 1080 1013 1042 1003 954 974 952 913 940 915 890(224) (291) (262) (301) (350) (330) (352) (391) (364) (389) (414)

82.8% 77.7% 79.9% 76.9% 73.2% 74.7% 73.0% 70.0% 72.1% 70.2% 68.3%

Liberty 1063 0 1063 1188 1151 1116 1050 1061 1090 1102 1099 1071 1056 1060125 88 53 (13) (2) 27 39 36 8 (7) (3)

111.8% 108.3% 105.0% 98.8% 99.8% 102.5% 103.7% 103.4% 100.8% 99.3% 99.7%

Manchester Valley 1252 40 1292 753 756 741 711 718 693 711 720 723 746 728(606) (603) (618) (648) (641) (666) (648) (639) (636) (613) (631)

58.3% 58.5% 57.4% 55.0% 55.6% 53.6% 55.0% 55.7% 56.0% 57.7% 56.3%

North Carroll 1339 20 1359 829 767 780 759 751 756 759 765 765 784 773(530) (592) (579) (600) (608) (603) (600) (594) (594) (575) (586)

61.0% 56.4% 57.4% 55.8% 55.3% 55.6% 55.8% 56.3% 56.3% 57.7% 56.9%

South Carroll 1380 30 1410 1114 1109 1066 1070 1083 1050 1091 1084 1061 1059 1031(296) (301) (344) (340) (327) (360) (319) (326) (349) (351) (379)

79.0% 78.7% 75.6% 75.9% 76.8% 74.5% 77.4% 76.9% 75.2% 75.1% 73.1%

Westminster 1849 30 1879 1688 1672 1623 1625 1579 1545 1508 1541 1570 1591 1599(191) (207) (256) (254) (300) (334) (371) (338) (309) (288) (280)

89.8% 89.0% 86.4% 86.5% 84.0% 82.2% 80.3% 82.0% 83.6% 84.7% 85.1%

Winters Mill 1190 50 1240 1187 1169 1149 1143 1192 1236 1264 1313 1334 1344 1371(53) (71) (91) (97) (48) (4) 24 73 94 104 131

95.7% 94.3% 92.7% 92.2% 96.1% 99.7% 101.9% 105.9% 107.6% 108.4% 110.6%TOTALS 10,517 270 10,787 9,075 8,846 8,688 8,483 8,425 8,425 8,450 8,515 8,552 8,542 8,501

(1,712) (1,941) (2,099) (2,304) (2,362) (2,362) (2,337) (2,272) (2,235) (2,245) (2,286) 84.1% 82.0% 80.5% 78.6% 78.1% 78.1% 78.3% 78.9% 79.3% 79.2% 78.8%

Comparisons are based on total State Rated capacity with FTE

Percent of STATE Capacity

Over (Under) State Rated Capacity

Over (Under) State Rated CapacityPercent of STATE Capacity

Over (Under) State Rated CapacityPercent of STATE Capacity

Percent of STATE Capacity

Percent of STATE Capacity

Over (Under) State Rated CapacityPercent of STATE Capacity

Capacity

Over (Under) State Rated CapacityPercent of STATE Capacity

Over (Under) State Rated Capacity

Over (Under) State Rated CapacityPercent of STATE Capacity

State Rated

Over (Under) State Rated CapacityPercent of STATE Capacity

Over (Under) State Rated Capacity

52

Page 56: CAPITAL BUDGET FY 2013 · 2016. 6. 21. · Capital Budget Process ... FY 2013 Capital Budget Request ... update to the March 2008 Report on Physical and Functional Assessments of

Carroll County Public Schools Actual & Projected EnrollmentEducational Facilities Master Plan - 2011-2020HIGH SCHOOLS

Southern AreaEnrollment Enrollment Enrollment

Actual Projected ProjectedSchool 9-12 Spec Ed Total 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020Century 1190 50 1240 1236 1209 1171 1122 1087 1081 1063 1080 1088 1047 1049

(4) (31) (69) (118) (153) (159) (177) (160) (152) (193) (191) 99.7% 97.5% 94.4% 90.5% 87.7% 87.2% 85.7% 87.1% 87.7% 84.4% 84.6%

Liberty 1063 0 1063 1188 1151 1116 1050 1061 1090 1102 1099 1071 1056 1060125 88 53 (13) (2) 27 39 36 8 (7) (3)

111.8% 108.3% 105.0% 98.8% 99.8% 102.5% 103.7% 103.4% 100.8% 99.3% 99.7%

South Carroll 1380 30 1410 1114 1109 1066 1070 1083 1050 1091 1084 1061 1059 1031(266) (271) (314) (310) (297) (330) (289) (296) (319) (321) (349)

79.0% 78.7% 75.6% 75.9% 76.8% 74.5% 77.4% 76.9% 75.2% 75.1% 73.1%TOTALS 3633 80 3713 3538 3469 3353 3242 3231 3221 3256 3263 3220 3162 3140

(175) (244) (360) (471) (482) (492) (457) (450) (493) (551) (573) 95.3% 93.4% 90.3% 87.3% 87.0% 86.7% 87.7% 87.9% 86.7% 85.2% 84.6%

Northwestern AreaEnrollment Enrollment Enrollment

Actual Projected ProjectedSchool 9-12 Spec Ed Total 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

Francis Scott Key 1254 50 1304 1080 1013 1042 1003 954 974 952 913 940 915 890(224) (291) (262) (301) (350) (330) (352) (391) (364) (389) (414)

82.8% 77.7% 79.9% 76.9% 73.2% 74.7% 73.0% 70.0% 72.1% 70.2% 68.3%

Comparisons are based on total State Rated capacity with FTE

Over (Under) State Rated CapacityPercent of STATE Capacity

Over (Under) State Rated CapacityPercent of STATE Capacity

CapacityState Rated

Capacity

Over (Under) State Rated CapacityPercent of STATE Capacity

Over (Under) State Rated CapacityPercent of STATE Capacity

State Rated

Over (Under) State Rated CapacityPercent of STATE Capacity

53

Page 57: CAPITAL BUDGET FY 2013 · 2016. 6. 21. · Capital Budget Process ... FY 2013 Capital Budget Request ... update to the March 2008 Report on Physical and Functional Assessments of

Carroll County Public Schools Actual & Projected EnrollmentEducational Facilities Master Plan - 2011-2020HIGH SCHOOLS

Northeastern AreaEnrollment Enrollment Enrollment

Actual Projected ProjectedSchool 9-12 Spec Ed Total 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

Manchester Valley 1252 40 1292 753 756 741 711 718 693 711 720 723 746 728(606) (603) (618) (648) (641) (666) (648) (639) (636) (613) (631)

58.3% 58.5% 57.4% 55.0% 55.6% 53.6% 55.0% 55.7% 56.0% 57.7% 56.3%

North Carroll 1339 20 1359 829 767 780 759 751 756 759 765 765 784 773(530) (592) (579) (600) (608) (603) (600) (594) (594) (575) (586)

61.0% 56.4% 57.4% 55.8% 55.3% 55.6% 55.8% 56.3% 56.3% 57.7% 56.9%TOTALS 2591 60 2651 1582 1523 1521 1470 1469 1449 1470 1485 1488 1530 1501

(1,069) (1,128) (1,130) (1,181) (1,182) (1,202) (1,181) (1,166) (1,163) (1,121) (1,150) 59.7% 57.5% 57.4% 55.5% 55.4% 54.7% 55.5% 56.0% 56.1% 57.7% 56.6%

Westminster AreaEnrollment Enrollment Enrollment

Actual Projected ProjectedSchool 9-12 Spec Ed Total 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

Westminster 1849 30 1879 1688 1672 1623 1625 1579 1545 1508 1541 1570 1591 1599(191) (207) (256) (254) (300) (334) (371) (338) (309) (288) (280)

89.8% 89.0% 86.4% 86.5% 84.0% 82.2% 80.3% 82.0% 83.6% 84.7% 85.1%

Winters Mill 1190 50 1240 1187 1169 1149 1143 1192 1236 1264 1313 1334 1344 1371(53) (71) (91) (97) (48) (4) 24 73 94 104 131

95.7% 94.3% 92.7% 92.2% 96.1% 99.7% 101.9% 105.9% 107.6% 108.4% 110.6%TOTALS 3039 80 3119 2875 2841 2772 2768 2771 2781 2772 2854 2904 2935 2970

(244) (278) (347) (351) (348) (338) (347) (265) (215) (184) (149) 92.2% 91.1% 88.9% 88.7% 88.8% 89.2% 88.9% 91.5% 93.1% 94.1% 95.2%

Comparisons are based on total State Rated capacity with FTE

CapacityState Rated

Over (Under) State Rated CapacityPercent of STATE Capacity

Over (Under) State Rated CapacityPercent of STATE Capacity

Over (Under) State Rated CapacityPercent of STATE Capacity

CapacityState Rated

Over (Under) State Rated CapacityPercent of STATE Capacity

Over (Under) State Rated CapacityPercent of STATE Capacity

Over (Under) State Rated CapacityPercent of STATE Capacity

54

Page 58: CAPITAL BUDGET FY 2013 · 2016. 6. 21. · Capital Budget Process ... FY 2013 Capital Budget Request ... update to the March 2008 Report on Physical and Functional Assessments of

55

CARROLL COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS RELOCATABLE CLASSROOM PLACEMENT 2011-12

School Type

School Name

Number of Classrooms

Type of Relocatable Unit

Carrolltowne 14 3 doubles, 2 quads Charles Carroll 2 1 double Eldersburg 4 2 doubles Freedom 6 1 quad, 1 double Friendship Valley 4 1 quad Hampstead 4 2 doubles Linton Springs 2 1 double Mechanicsville 2 1 double Mt. Airy 2 1 double Piney Ridge 6 3 doubles Robert Moton 4 2 doubles Spring Garden 2 1 double Westminster 6 3 doubles William Winchester 8 4 doubles

ELE

MEN

TAR

Y

Winfield 2 1 double

Westminster East 4 2 doubles Mt. Airy 10 2 quads, 1 double Oklahoma Road 4 2 doubles Sykesville 8 4 doubles

MID

DLE

Westminster West 2 1 double

Liberty 7 4 doubles* North Carroll 2 1 double H

IGH

Westminster 8 1 quad, 2 doubles Carroll Springs 2 1 double Gateway School 2 1 double

SPECIAL Career & Tech Center 8 4 doubles

TOTAL CLASSROOMS 125 * One double classroom relocatable is being utilized as one science lab.