Cape Town BEPP – Addressing the backlogs and future demands for Social Amenities Community...

22
Cape Town BEPP – Addressing the backlogs and future demands for Social Amenities Community Services

Transcript of Cape Town BEPP – Addressing the backlogs and future demands for Social Amenities Community...

Page 1: Cape Town BEPP – Addressing the backlogs and future demands for Social Amenities Community Services.

Cape Town BEPP – Addressing the backlogs and future demands for Social Amenities

Community Services

Page 2: Cape Town BEPP – Addressing the backlogs and future demands for Social Amenities Community Services.

2Go to Insert > Header & Footer > Enter presentation name into footer field

Current Situation

City plans and options

Facility backlogs and growing demand

Financial realities

City Vision for Social Amenities

Presentation Overview

Workshops /discussions

Questions

Page 3: Cape Town BEPP – Addressing the backlogs and future demands for Social Amenities Community Services.

3

Community Services (Sport Fields/Complexes, Recreation Centres, Multipurpose Centres, Halls, Parks, Libraries)

Our vision:

To provide social amenities on an equitable and sustainable basis across Cape Town to promote

healthy lifestyles.

To optimise and rationalise social amenities on a continuous basis to ensure sustainability and

alignment to current and future community needs.

Addressing the backlogs and future demands for Social Amenities

Page 4: Cape Town BEPP – Addressing the backlogs and future demands for Social Amenities Community Services.

4Go to Insert > Header & Footer > Enter presentation name into footer field

Current Situation

• According to the South African National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (SANHANES) released on 6 August 2013, : "The Mother City knocked the socks off its rivals, offering its residents the greatest number of facilities (sports clubs, gyms, fitness amenities and recreational parks) per 100 000 people

• Numerous facility provision awards

Page 5: Cape Town BEPP – Addressing the backlogs and future demands for Social Amenities Community Services.

5

Page 6: Cape Town BEPP – Addressing the backlogs and future demands for Social Amenities Community Services.

Forward Planning 2032: Social Facilities in Cape Town

Integrated Social Facility Investment Priority Guide

(Product 5)

October 2014

CSIR/BE/SPS/ER/2014/0060/B.2

Page 7: Cape Town BEPP – Addressing the backlogs and future demands for Social Amenities Community Services.

ContextScientific-based accessibility analysis exercise that assesses whether people

have access to facilities, whether these facilities are within reasonable reach, and whether they’re able to accommodate future population

growth

This project product generally highlights the social/ community facility demand pictures for 2032 from a City of Cape Town perspective.

Demand 2007 projected population figures 2016 projected population figures 2032 projected population figures

Supply For every 0.2 Ha of district park, 1 000 people are served

Travel mode and access time

Transport via existing road network: District parks must be accessed within 20 minute travel time by vehicle in off peak conditions

Page 8: Cape Town BEPP – Addressing the backlogs and future demands for Social Amenities Community Services.

Thank you

Population Demand

3 664 445People

4 466 969People

(Projected)

High growth areas

Page 9: Cape Town BEPP – Addressing the backlogs and future demands for Social Amenities Community Services.

Municipal multicode sports grounds- Served and Unserved 2032(Constrained by distance (10km) & capacity)

79% Served

Municipal Multi - Code Sport Facilities

Page 10: Cape Town BEPP – Addressing the backlogs and future demands for Social Amenities Community Services.

Municipal Multicode Sports Grounds: Potential New Locations for 2032

Page 11: Cape Town BEPP – Addressing the backlogs and future demands for Social Amenities Community Services.

Overall Social Facility Investment Guide 2032

Page 12: Cape Town BEPP – Addressing the backlogs and future demands for Social Amenities Community Services.

City Manager1% Community Services

8%Transport for Cape

Town17%

Compliance & Auxil-iary Services

0%

Finance6%

Social Dev & Early Childhood Devel-

opment2%

Corporate Services41%

City Health1%

Safety & Security9%

Human Settlements3%

Economic, Envi-ronment & Spatial

Planning6%

Tourism, Events & Marketing5%

2014/15 EFF Capital Budget (excl. R1.7Bn EFF Utility Services)

CAPITAL BUDGET - EFF BASE ( COMMUNITY SERVICES)

EFF Base allocation limits access to USDG funding due to counter-funding requirements

City Parks9752752

16%

Library and In-formation Ser-

vices18963252

31%

Sport, Recreation and Ameni-

ties31902029

53%

Community Services 2014/15 EFF Capital Budget

Page 13: Cape Town BEPP – Addressing the backlogs and future demands for Social Amenities Community Services.

13

Community Services Capital Budget per Major Fund Source

Budget 2011/12

Budget 2012/13

Budget 2013/14

Current 2014/15

Proposed Pro-vision 2015/16

Proposed Pro-vision 2016/17

Proposed Pro-vision 2017/18

Proposed Pro-vision 2018/19

Proposed Pro-vision 2019/20

CGD 95917949 120917258 124955957 132703834 73617054 76471628 53640000 71000000 60500000

CRR 14552161 13810896 26564147 44040336 28042274 0 0 0 0

EFF 48501636 37992449 49905600 65618033 41573576 42573576 42573576 42573576 36332241

REV-ENUE

9921020 19419208 7700491 7175001 7096500 7463510 7850340 8258060 300000

GRAND TO-TAL

168892766 192139811 209126195 249537204 150329404 126508714 104063916 121831636 97132241

25,000,000

75,000,000

125,000,000

175,000,000

225,000,000

275,000,000

Page 14: Cape Town BEPP – Addressing the backlogs and future demands for Social Amenities Community Services.

2014/15 CAPITAL BUDGET per MAJOR FUND SOURCE

Department CGD CRR EFF REVENUE Grand Total Projects, Strategy & Support

266 990

266 990

City Parks 43 799

028 19 755

601 9 752

752 268

921 73 576

302 Sport, Recreation & Amenities

52 865 427

7 380 648

31 902 029

25 506

92 173 610

Library & Information Services

47 901 152

15 146 010

18 963 252

6 443 584

88 453 998

144 565 607

42 282 259

60 618 033

7 005 001

254 470 900

57% 16% 24% 3% 100%

2015/16 150 329 4042016/17 126 508 714

CGD57%

CRR17%

EFF24%

REVENUE3%

Cemetery Development2015/16 20 824 3922016/17 19 304 213

Page 15: Cape Town BEPP – Addressing the backlogs and future demands for Social Amenities Community Services.

15

STAFF ATTRITION COMMUNITY SERVICES

Yr 2003

Yr 2004

Yr 2005

Yr 2006

Yr 2007

Yr 2008

Yr 2009

Yr 2010

Yr 2011

Yr 2012

Yr 2013

Yr 2014

Community Services

4694 4447 4241 4064 3921 3816 3708 3669 3716 3729 3668 3634

City of Cape Town

18573 18353 19753 21588 21721 22481 23470 25320 25494 26768 27642 27681

2,500

7,500

12,500

17,500

22,500

27,500No of Staff per Org Unit

Community Services vs City of Cape Town 2003 -2014

No. of Staff

ComServ -23%

CoCT+49%

Page 16: Cape Town BEPP – Addressing the backlogs and future demands for Social Amenities Community Services.

CAPITAL BUDGET: COMMUNITY FACILITIES

Principles endorsed by Portfolio Committee :

Only capital projects with no future operating budget requirements.

Only upgrades and extensions to existing facilities where current operating budgets are available.

Business improvements projects, such as synthetic pitches to replace traditional turf to reduce future operating costs and allowing better future utilisation.

Capital safety measures at facilities to reduce security charges.

More cost effective service delivery options such as the proposed integrated approach to facility provision.

Page 17: Cape Town BEPP – Addressing the backlogs and future demands for Social Amenities Community Services.

CURRENT CITY APPROACH

• Pro-active integrated planning, budgeting, implementation and management (optimisation)– Metropolitan, District, Integrated Zone and Local Area Planning – Khayelitsha, Mfuleni Urban

Node.– Facility Level (City Directorates, External Funders, PAWC,) –Kuyasa Library, Du Doon North Integrated

Facility.– Facility Level (Community Services Departments) Blue Ridge, Valhalla Park

• Rationalisation project– Broad based action and mainstreaming– Quick wins

• Improve “return on investment” / expanding of current revenue sources– Commercial opportunities– Leases/management agreements

• Business improvements with the intent to save on operating budget– Partnerships/ volunteers / friends groups– Outsourcing– External funding (e.g. lotto)– Hardening of facilities / artificial pitches / automatic irrigation ext.

17Go to Insert > Header & Footer > Enter presentation name into footer field

Page 18: Cape Town BEPP – Addressing the backlogs and future demands for Social Amenities Community Services.

Integrated planning examples

Page 19: Cape Town BEPP – Addressing the backlogs and future demands for Social Amenities Community Services.

19

Khayelitsha

Page 20: Cape Town BEPP – Addressing the backlogs and future demands for Social Amenities Community Services.

Valhalla Park: Integrated Facilities Planning

Precinct 3

Valhalla Park Community Recreation Park

Lavistown Local Area Plan – Angela Street Precinct

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Page 21: Cape Town BEPP – Addressing the backlogs and future demands for Social Amenities Community Services.

21Go to Insert > Header & Footer > Enter presentation name into footer field

SUMMARY

Amenity demand / backlogs and

growth

Funding capex & opex

Current City plan and

options ?

Page 22: Cape Town BEPP – Addressing the backlogs and future demands for Social Amenities Community Services.

22Go to Insert > Header & Footer > Enter presentation name into footer field

Questions that need to be answered / Discussion points

• What could be changed or added to the current City’s approach?

• What institutional arrangements /capacity should be put in place / be created to manage multi functional integrated facilities?

• Does the Integrated Human Settlement planning and funding model result in “Integrated Human Settlements”?

• Are the current Social Amenities facility provision standards as currently set affordable and sustainable in the South African context? How should these standards be determined?

• Could additional funding be made available for the provision and management of Library Information Services (underfunded by R500 million)?