Cancer Mortality Analysis Report
-
Upload
aakash-parwani -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
0
Transcript of Cancer Mortality Analysis Report
-
7/25/2019 Cancer Mortality Analysis Report
1/34
Data Analysis & Decision
Model
Cancer Mortality Analysis Report
Prepared by:
Aakash Parwani
Sumit Sameriya
Kshitij Tiwari
1
-
7/25/2019 Cancer Mortality Analysis Report
2/34
ContentsAbstract......................................................................................................................2
Introduction................................................................................................................ 3
Literature Review....................................................................................................... 6
Factors........................................................................................................................ 8
Sex.......................................................................................................................... 8
State...................................................................................................................... 10
Age Grou............................................................................................................. 11
!ancer Sites.......................................................................................................... 13
"t#nicit$................................................................................................................ 16
Resu%ts & ana%$sis.....................................................................................................20
!orre%ation Ana%$sis...............................................................................................20
'eat#s & Age Grou...........................................................................................21
'eat#s & !ancer Sites.......................................................................................22
'eat#s & State................................................................................................... 2(
'eat#s & "t#nicit$............................................................................................. 2)
*u%tivariate Ana%$sis............................................................................................. 28
*u%tivariate ana%$sis s$ste+s nor+a%%$ uti%i,ed -or............................................28
it# *u%tivariate Ana%$sis $ou can.....................................................................2/
Ana%$sis.............................................................................................................. 2/
!onc%usion................................................................................................................ 31
Future "n#ance+ent................................................................................................ 32
Acnow%edge+ent.................................................................................................... 32
Re-erences................................................................................................................33
2
-
7/25/2019 Cancer Mortality Analysis Report
3/34
AbstractCancer is a noteworthy general wellbeing issue in the United States and numerous different parts
of the world. t is presently the second dri!ing reason for death in the United States" and is
re#uired to surpass heart sic$nesses as the main source of death in the following couple of years.
n this Report" we will concentrate on the central point that is identified with Cancer passings.
%he components that gi!e some dissected proof of growth demise. e will be doing Regression
Analysis to locate the most ideal relationship between the autonomous !ariables and the reliant
!ariable" which will gi!e enough proof to consider the relationship into down to earth.
'or this in!estigation" we will consider information from ())) to *+(*. e will be supporting
the e,amination through diagrams which will itself picture the conclusion. n the middle of" we
will be indicating growth passings in light of age gathering" se," state and e!ery single tumor site
which are our autonomous !ariables.
3
-
7/25/2019 Cancer Mortality Analysis Report
4/34
IntroductionCancer is a disease in which body tissue gets destroyed by the abnormal cells present in the body.
Some of the symptoms of cancer are une,plained weight loss" abnormal bleeding" a new lump" a
prolonged cough and change in bowel mo!ements of human body. hile these all symptoms are
indicators of cancer" there are also some other issues through which it can occur. %he #uantity of
indi!iduals li!ing past a disease finding came to about (-. million in *+(- and is relied upon to
ascend to right around () million by *+*-. /ational consumptions for tumor care in the United
States totaled almost 0(* billion in *+(+ and could reach 0(1 billion in *+*+2Murphy" *+(34.
%he deaths due to cancer are increasing in USA. n order to analy5e the situations in cancer"
American Cancer Society was established in May" ()(3. t was de!eloped to showcase the
increasing cancer deaths o!er the years through facts and figures. %heir main focus is on the new
cases that are occurring and the deaths that can ta$e place in each year to find the total
contemporary cancer burden. %hey concentrate on the past years deaths and pro!ide the trend for
ne,t years and the new symptoms coming in picture. %he society has helped o!er the years to
help people sur!i!e and reco!er from cancer disease26owlader" *+(-4.
%he 7rgani5ations in USA ha!e built some numerical related facts and figures based on cancer
deaths which ha!e helped for future forecast for total number of deaths. %here are many types of
Cancer disease that are based on different body parts such as brain" chest" respiratory system"
eye" anal" etc. Some of the cancers that ha!e caused ma,imum deaths o!er the years are Male
and 'emale 8reast Cancer" Digesti!e System Cancer" Respiratory System Cancer" Male 9enital
System and many more. 'rom ())) to *+(*" Respiratory System Cancer and Male and 'emale
8reast Cancer ha!e caused more than + thousand deaths. Among all of the Cancer diseases
(
-
7/25/2019 Cancer Mortality Analysis Report
5/34
Respiratory System Cancer and Male and 'emale 8reast Cancer has been the maor death
resulting disease in Cancer types. e will discuss few of them2Copeland" *+(-4.
8reast cancer is the group of cells that starts growing in the breast or chest of human. t can also
affect the entire body. 8reast Cancer is the *ndmost common cancer in women. American Cancer
Society has made a total estimation of *3(;-+ new cases that will occur in women in *+(. 7f
which -+*)+ women indications incorporate trouble gulping and weight reduction. 6a5ard elements
incorporate smo$ing" li#uor use" and a little rate of patients with continuous acid reflu,. 9astric
)
-
7/25/2019 Cancer Mortality Analysis Report
6/34
2stomach4 cancer is a great deal less normal in the United States than some different parts of the
world howe!er chance !ariables incorporate contamination with 6elicobacter pylori and eating a
ton of sustenance
-
7/25/2019 Cancer Mortality Analysis Report
7/34
Literature Review%he primary =ubMed search produced ++ citations" of which *13 met the inclusion criteria. %he
first published study that met our inclusion criteria was published in ()B by S@@R" which is
authoritati!e source of information on cancer incidence" mortality and sur!i!al in the United
States.
All the reports present on S@@R was in the public domain" which can be used for analysis. t
pro!ided information on Mortality rate of () age groups and then Regression is applied on that
data to find relationship between Age 9roup of patients and Mortality Rate. %his Regression
resulted in B* 2RS#uare4.
%he second published study that met our criteria was published by CDC 2Centers for Disease
Control and =re!entions4" this study was about Cancer Rates by U.S. State and Se,. %his study
was done on data between years ()))*+(*. 'or understanding the relationship MultiEinear
Regression was applied between Mortality Rate 2Dependent Fariable4 and Se," Age9roup" State
2ndependent Fariables4. %his Regression analysis resulted in ;+ 2RS#uare4.
%o understand which type of Cancer is most fre#uent in the US Citi5ens" we found help from
CDC 2Centers for Disease Control and =re!entions4. According to recent studies done Eeu$emia
& Eymphoma is the most fre#uent Caner Site in US Citi5ens. Also" a particular society named
GEeu$emia & Eymphoma SocietyH is de!eloped to fight against this Cancer.
-
7/25/2019 Cancer Mortality Analysis Report
8/34
Factors
Sex
Se, is one of our independent !ariable in the analysis. Cancer deaths differ based on gender. t is
found that male ha!e more higher death rates of cancer than women. Research shows that cancer
death fre#uency in men is more is higher and the sur!i!al becomes e!en worse once it occurs in
them. Coo$ has published his study in GCancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and preventionH
which shows that if the causes of both the genders in cancer incidence can be identified" then
pre!enti!e measures can be ta$en to reduce the burden created by cancer on men and women.
%he #uantity of new instances of malignancy 2tumor occurrence4 is --.; for e!ery (++"+++ men
and ladies for each year 2ta$ing into account *++;*+(* cases4. %he #uantity of disease passings
2malignancy mortality4 is (B(.* for e!ery (++"+++ men and ladies for e!ery year 2in light of
*++;*+(* passings4.
Coo$ and his entire research team analy5ed in depth USA data from a huge database" which had
statistics on appro,imately 3 cancers by se, and age from ()BB to *++1. %heir findings included
that Male cancer deaths are higher than women 26an$ey" *++*4.
Researchers also focused on the year sur!i!al rate of the people with different types of cancer.
%hey found that Male had !ery bad sur!i!al as compared to female. %hey also said that in future
research should be based on factors that ha!e higher diagnosis rate of cancer among men.
n youth cancer" males are again at a higher danger than females. %he se, differential in the
fre#uency of adolescence cancer is settled and reliable around the world 2Ashley" ()1)>
9reenberg and Shuster" ();> Einet and De!esa" ())(> =earce and =ar$er" *++(> Cartwright et
8
-
7/25/2019 Cancer Mortality Analysis Report
9/34
al." *++*> Desandes et al." *++-4. %he M:' proportion for e!ery single occurrence cancer is
around (.*. Special cases to the male o!erabundance in youth cancer incorporate newborn child
leu$emia" thyroid carcinoma" threatening melanoma" and al!eolar delicate part sarcoma. As in
grownups" /6E demonstrates a steady male o!erabundance in all age bunches amid
adolescence and immature period 2range I (.BJ3.*4" while 6odg$in lymphoma 26E4
demonstrates an intriguing agesubordinate !ariety in its M:' proportion 2Ries et al." ()))4. %he
general rate of 6E in youngsters is more noteworthy in females than in males 2M:' ratio I +.;4"
yet the se, circulation is agesubordinate" with the stri$ing M:' proportion in 6E in more
youthful ages when the disease is uncommon switching for teenagers when it turns out to be
more basic 2Spit5 et al." ();14. %he S@@R information from ())+ to ()) period show M:'
proportions of .3 2K year4" (.- 2J) year4" (.( 2(+J(- year4" and +.; 2(J()> Ries et al." ()))4
2@bru" *+(*4.
Cancer Male to 'emale Death Ratio
Eip Cancer .( to (
Earyn, .3B to (
6ypopharny, -.B( to (
@sophagus -.+; to (
8ladder Cancer 3.31 to (
Eung Cancer *.3( to (
Colorectal Cancer (.-* to (
=ancreatic Cancer (.3B to (
Eeu$emia (.B to (
8ile Duct Cancer *.*3 to (
State
California" and maybe soon /ew Lor$" is confronting a concei!able growth scourge of more
noteworthy e,tent than as of now e,ists. %his is of real sympathy toward all fol$s and youngsters
o!er the US on the grounds that as California goes" so goes the country. 8ills are being
/
-
7/25/2019 Cancer Mortality Analysis Report
10/34
presented and mar$ed all through the United States that are e!acuating your restorati!e decision
and educated assent. 8eginning in *+(1" California will re#uire all go!ernment funded school
$ids to be infused with $nown growth ma$ing fi,ings all together get an instruction. n /ew
Lor$" a comparati!e bill has been presented.
Maybe the most e!ident and warmed point for families confronting this medicinal ambush is the
way that it is obscure if the immuni5ations being constrained onto the $ids cause growth. %he
genuine immuni5ation paper embeds 2or online =D'4 for e!ery antibody e,presses the
accompanying:
%his immuni5ation has not been assessed for its cancercausing or mutagenic possibilities or
debilitation of ripeness.
@ach antibody contains a huge number of dangerous fi,ings" or adu!ants" which are each
cancercausing in their own particular right. %he fi,ings are Aluminum" 'ormaldehyde and
Mercury.
A recent report distributed in Molecular Carcinogenesis indicated reliably lifted dangers for
pancreatic malignancy in people wor$ing in the aluminum creation and metalwor$ing
commercial !entures. A recent report distributed in the Nournal of Applied %o,icology found that
the impact of aluminum on cell multiplication and cell senescence is stri$ingly li$e that of
enacted oncogenes in human epithelial mammary tissue.
'ormaldehyde presentation is an e,ceptional sympathy toward $ids and the elderly. Loungsters
may get to be touchy to formaldehyde all the more effortlessly" which may ma$e it more
probable they will get to be wiped out2=ic$le" *++B4.
10
-
7/25/2019 Cancer Mortality Analysis Report
11/34
A study in the Scandina!ian Nournal of or$" @n!ironment and 6ealth presumed that methyl
mercury chloride causes $idney tumors in male mice and mercury chloride has demonstrated
some cancercausing mo!ement in male rats. %he concentrate li$ewise e,pressed that
epidemiological information indicates the li$elihood of a danger of lung" $idney" and focal
sensory system tumors.
Age Group
%he cancer can occur at any point of life. %he age has a !ery important effect in the death due to
the cancer. %he GAge 9roupH category represented in the following analysis is the age of the
cancer patient at which heOshe died. Chart in 'ig *. 9i!es a good !iew of !ariation in death rate
because of Cancer with Age. As we can see number of deaths obser!ed in cancer patients of age
less than ( year is !ery less and patients of age group 11) and B+B- has obser!ed highest
deaths. 8ut one thing to notice here is that death rate for cancer are higher among middleaged
and elderly populations29hosh" *+(*4.
As the population ages" numerous diseases that o!erwhelmingly influence more seasoned people
will turn out to be more common. n addition numerous conditions that influence the elderly will
happen in mi," in this way muddling watch o!er a particular condition 2"14. =ropelling age is a
high ha5ard element for cancer" with persons more than 1 representing 1+ of recently
analy5ed malignancies and B+ of e!ery single cancer death 2B";4. %he age balanced cancer
fre#uency rate is *((O(++"+++ population for those more than 1 contrasted with *+;O(++"+++
for those under 1 2B";4. @ssentially" the age balanced cancer death rate for those more than 1 is
(+1;O(++"+++ contrasted with 1BO(++"+++ for those under 1 2B";4. n this manner" the fre#uency
11
-
7/25/2019 Cancer Mortality Analysis Report
12/34
of cancer in those more than 1 is (+ times more prominent than in those more youthful than 1
and the cancer death rate is (1 times more noteworthy in patients more than 1 contrasted with
more youthful patients. More than B+ of the mortality connected with numerous cancers
including prostate" bladder" colon" uterus" pancreas" stomach" rectum and lung happen in patients
1 and more established 2B";4. ndeed" e!en with a dynamic diminishing in the cancer fre#uency
and death rate" maturing of the population will be oined by a chec$ed increment in the aggregate
number of patients with cancer and the re#uirement for doctors and guardians to ha!e
e,traordinary aptitude in both oncology and geriatrics.
%he turning gray demographics in the United States and the way that cancer rate in people rises
e,ponentially in the last many years of life" recommends that cancer may soon supplant coronary
illness as the main source of death in this nation. %hese demographics raise basic difficulties to
be met by American pharmaceutical. Despite e,hibiting the criticalness of wanting to deal with
the e,tended weight of growth" these data offer climb to different re#uest regarding the
association of de!eloping to cancer2Robert" *++14"
0
100000
200000
300000
(00000
)00000
600000
'eat# it# Age Grous
12
Fig 2. I%%ustrates #ow !ancer 'eat# rate varies wit# Age.
-
7/25/2019 Cancer Mortality Analysis Report
13/34
Cancer Sites
Another most important factor which influences cancer death is the Gcancer sitesH. %here are
certain parts of the body which are more prone to the cancer cells. %he Gcancer sitesH in the
following study represents the area of the body which was affected from cancer and causes the
death of the patient.
n below table we can see the estimated new cases and deaths in the year *+(. 'rom the table"
we can conclude that Eung and bronchus Cancer which is respiratory cancer and breast cancer
ha!e ma,imum new cases and deaths in *+(.
n relation analysis section we would try to find out any relationship between death and cancer
site using Einear Regression2alter" *+(34.
13
-
7/25/2019 Cancer Mortality Analysis Report
14/34
Somewhere around *+(+ and *+*+" we e,pect the #uantity of new cancer cases in the United
States to go up around *- in men to more than ( million cases for e!ery year" and by around
*( in women to more than )++"+++ cases for each year.
%he sorts of cancer we hope to build the most are?
Melanoma 2the deadliest sort of s$in cancer4 in white men and women.
=rostate" $idney" li!er" and bladder cancers in men.
Eung" breast" uterine" and thyroid cancers in women.
%hroughout the following decade" we anticipate that cancer rate rates will stay about the same>
howe!er the #uantity of new cancer cases to go up" for the most part due to a maturing white
population and a de!eloping dar$ population. Since cancer patients general are li!ing longer" the
#uantity of cancer sur!i!ors is relied upon to go up from around ((.B million in *++B to (;
million by *+*+.
1(
-
7/25/2019 Cancer Mortality Analysis Report
15/34
Cigarette smo$ing is connected to numerous sorts of cancer" particularly lung cancer. n the
United States" smo$ing has declined following the first Surgeon 9enerals Report on Smo$ing
and 6ealth was distributed in ()1-. n li$e manner" new instances of lung cancer ha!e gone
down subse#uent to the mid();+s in men and the late ())+s in women?#uic$er in men than
women. %he #uantity of new lung cancer cases in men is re#uired to finish what has been started
somewhere around *+(+ and *+*+" yet more than (+"+++ e,tra new lung cancer cases are relied
upon to be found in women e!ery year by *+*+.
7!erweight and obesity raise ha5ard for female breast" colorectal" esophageal" uterine" pancreas"
and $idney cancers. n the wa$e of e,panding in the course of recent decades" around 11 of
grownups and 33 of youngsters are currently o!erweight or fat. ith the e,ception of breast
and colorectal cancers" the #uantity of weightrelated cancers is re#uired to go up 3+ to -+ by
*+*+.
1)
-
7/25/2019 Cancer Mortality Analysis Report
16/34
Cancers brought on by contaminations are li$ewise anticipated that would increment. /ew
instances of li!er cancer are relied upon to go up more than half" li$ely the aftereffect of the
increment in hepatitis diseases" especially in indi!iduals concei!ed somewhere around ()- and
()1. 7ral cancers in white men are relied upon to increment by around 3+" li$ely the
conse#uence of more human papilloma!irus 26=F4 contamination 2%hompson" *+(4.
Ethnicity
Another effecti!e e,planatory !ariable found out to be is GethnicityH of the people. 'rom the
Data collected o!er the years" we pro!ide some relation between the ethnicity and the death rate
due to cancer in USA. @thnicity in the study is categori5ed maorly into /on6ispanic hite"
American ndianOAlas$a /ati!e" 6ispanic" and AsianO=acific slander women.
%he below table shows ncidence and Death Rates by Site" Race" and @thnicity" United States"
*++B to *+((2Anderson" *+(34.
16
-
7/25/2019 Cancer Mortality Analysis Report
17/34
'rom ()))J*+(*" the rate of indi!iduals $ic$ing the buc$et from cancer has shifted" contingent
upon their race and ethnicity. %he diagram underneath demonstrates that in *+(*" among men"
dar$ men will probably pass on of cancer than whate!er other gathering" trailed by white"
6ispanic" American ndianOAlas$a /ati!e" and AsianO=acific slander men. Among ladies" dar$
ladies will probably bite the dust of cancer than whate!er other gathering" trailed by white"
American ndianOAlas$a /ati!e" 6ispanic" and AsianO=acific slander ladies.
1
-
7/25/2019 Cancer Mortality Analysis Report
18/34
Findings
8elow" we ha!e written few findings from articles which include bac$ground" methods" results"
conclusions" impact:
8ac$ground: A relationship between Newish ethnicity and pancreatic cancer danger was
recommended by in!estigations loo$ing at pancreatic cancer death rates in the middle of News
and nonNews in /ew Lor$ in the ()+s. %hese e,aminations needed data on potential perple,ing
!ariables and the relationship between Newish ethnicity and pancreatic cancer has not been
analy5ed in any contemporary U.S. populace or in any accomplice study2Nacobs" *++)4.
Methods: Analy5ed the relationship between Newish ethnicity and pancreatic cancer mortality
among roughly ( million members in the Cancer =re!ention Study companion. Members
finished a sur!ey at enlistment in ();* which included data on religion" smo$ing" corpulence"
and diabetes. Amid followup through *++1" there were 1"B*B pancreatic cancer passings"
including -;+ among Newish members. Relati!e perils displaying was utili5ed to figure
multi!ariable rate proportions 2RR42Nemal" *++)4.
Results: After conforming for age" se," smo$ing" body mass list" and diabetes" pancreatic cancer
mortality was higher among Newish members than among nonNewish whites 2RR I (.-3> )
C" (.3+J(.B4. n in!estigations by origin" RRs were (.) 2) C" (.3(J(.)34 for /orth
AmericanJborn News with /orth AmericanJborn fol$s" (.-3 2) C" (.*BJ(.1(4 for /orth
AmericanJborn News with ( or more fol$s concei!ed outside /orth America" and (.+3 2+.B3"
(.--4 for News concei!ed outside /orth America 2=heterogeneity I +.+B4 2Coughlin" *+++4.
Conclusions: %hese results bolster a higher danger of creating pancreatic cancer among U.S.
News that is not clarified by built up danger elements.
18
-
7/25/2019 Cancer Mortality Analysis Report
19/34
mpact: 'uture studies might clear up the part of particular ecological or hereditary components
in charge of higher danger among U.S. News. Cancer @pidemiol 8iomar$ers.
Results & analysis
1/
-
7/25/2019 Cancer Mortality Analysis Report
20/34
Correlation Analysis
n correlation analysis" we gauge an e,ample correlation coefficient" all the more particularly the
=earson =roduct Moment correlation coefficient. %he specimen correlation coefficient" meant r"
ranges between ( and P( and e!aluates the course and #uality of the straight relationship
between the two !ariables. %he correlation between two !ariables can be sure 2i.e." larger
amounts of one !ariable are connected with more ele!ated amounts of the other4 or negati!e 2i.e."
more ele!ated amounts of one !ariable are connected with lower le!els of the other4.
%he indication of the correlation coefficient shows the bearing of the affiliation. %he greatness of
the correlation coefficient shows the #uality of the affiliation.
'or instance" a correlation of r I +.) proposes a solid" positi!e relationship between two
!ariables" though a correlation of r I +.* recommend a frail" negati!e affiliation. A correlation
near 5ero proposes no direct relationship between two persistent !ariables2Mu$a$a" *+(*4.
e will be highlighting separate analysis of relationship between dependent !ariable i.e.
Number of Deaths because of Cancer and independent !ariables i.e. Age Group, State,
Ethnicity, Cancer Sites. %hese relations are generated on data ta$en between years ()))*+(*
2Midthune" *+++4.
eaths & Age Group
20
-
7/25/2019 Cancer Mortality Analysis Report
21/34
%o understand relationship between these two !ariables in a better way" we del!e into analysis
using Einear Regression with A/7FA and 'ig 3. llustrates the results.
Fig 3. Linear regression resu%ts using S4A4 add5in.
'rom abo!e statistics we can say" Cancer is primarily a disease of older people" with mortality
rates increasing with age for most cancers.
eaths & Cancer Sites
21
-
7/25/2019 Cancer Mortality Analysis Report
22/34
Chart in 'ig -.gi!es a good idea of how Death count !aries with different Cancer Sites between
years ()))*+(*. Cancer in Digesti!e System has caused highest number of deaths 2B(1B)(4"
and cancer at @ye & 7rbit 2-(14 has caused least number of deaths.
0200000(00000600000800000
eaths & Cancer Sites
Fig (. I%%ustrates #ow !ancer 'eat# rate varies wit# dierent cancer sites.
'rom 'ig . e can analy5e the most fre#uent cancer sites" data suggests that Eymphomas"
Eeu$emia are the most fre#uent cancer sites. 7n the other hand @ye and 7rbit is the least
fre#uent cancer site2ard" *+(*4.
0200(00600800
1000
Cancer sites with Fre!uency
Fre7uenc$
Fig ). !ancer sites wit# -re7uenc$.
22
-
7/25/2019 Cancer Mortality Analysis Report
23/34
Fig 6. Linear regression resu%ts using S4A4 add5in.
eaths & State
23
-
7/25/2019 Cancer Mortality Analysis Report
24/34
Rates of dying from cancer !ary from state to state. n the following maps" the U.S. states are
di!ided into groups based on the rates at which people died from cancer till *+(*" which is the
most recent year with numbers a!ailable.
'or now we ha!e analy5ed death rates in two states only /ew Lor$ and California from 'ig B.
e can easily analy5e that California State has obser!ed more death 2*+-*(B)4 because of
cancer and /ew Lor$ has got less 2(1;1++34 number of death2Qramer" ();)4.
!a%i-ornia ew9or0
)00000
1000000
1)00000
2000000
2)00000
State & eaths
Fig . Gra# to i%%ustrate state5wise rate o- d$ing -ro+ cancer.
2(
-
7/25/2019 Cancer Mortality Analysis Report
25/34
eaths & Ethnicity
'rom ()))J*+(*" the rate of people dying from cancer has !aried" depending on their race and
ethnicity. %he graph in 'ig ; below shows that in *+(*" among men" blac$ men were more li$ely
to die of cancer than any other group" followed by white" 6ispanic" American ndianOAlas$a
/ati!e" and AsianO=acific slander men.
Fig 8. Gra# to i%%ustrate state5wise rate o- d$ing -ro+ cancer.
2)
-
7/25/2019 Cancer Mortality Analysis Report
26/34
'rom 'ig ). e can say that blac$ women were more li$ely to die of cancer than any other
group" followed by white" American ndianOAlas$a /ati!e" 6ispanic" and AsianO=acific slander
women25mirlian" *+(34.
Fig /. Gra# to i%%ustrate state5wise rate o- d$ing -ro+ cancer.
%o better understand the relation between Death and @thnicity factor" we performed linear
regression using =6S%A% and 'ig (+ is showing the results of linear regression" here ethnicity is
ta$en as Categorical !ariable. 6owe!er" !alue of RS#uare from this analysis is ((.
26
-
7/25/2019 Cancer Mortality Analysis Report
27/34
Fig 10. Linear regression resu%ts using S4A4 add5in.
2
-
7/25/2019 Cancer Mortality Analysis Report
28/34
"ultivariate Analysis
Multi!ariate Data Analysis alludes to any factual system used to dissect data that emerges from
more than one !ariable. %his basically models reality where e!ery circumstance" item" or choice
includes more than a solitary !ariable. %he data age has brought about masses of data in each
field. n spite of the #uantum of data accessible" the capacity to ac#uire a reasonable picture of
what is going on and settle on $een choices is a test. At the point when accessible data is put
away in database tables containing lines and sections" Multi!ariate Analysis can be utili5ed to
handle the data in a significant manner.
"ultivariate analysis syste#s nor#ally utili$ed %or
8uyer and statistical sur!eying
uality control and #uality certification o!er a scope of businesses" for e,ample" nourishment
and refreshment" paint" pharmaceuticals" chemicals" !itality" information transfers" and so forth =rocess enhancement and process control
nno!ati!e wor$
ith "ultivariate Analysis you can
28
-
7/25/2019 Cancer Mortality Analysis Report
29/34
Ac#uire an outline or a diagram of a table. %his analysis is fre#uently called =rincipal
Components Analysis or 'actor Analysis. n the diagram" it is concei!able to recogni5e the
predominant e,amples in the data" for e,ample" bunches" anomalies" patterns" et cetera.
Dissect bunches in the table" how these gatherings !ary" and to which aggregate indi!idual table
lines ha!e a place. %his $ind of analysis is called Classification and Discriminant Analysis. Disco!er connections between segments in data tables" for occurrence connections between
procedure operation conditions and item #uality. %he goal is to utili5e one arrangement of
!ariables 2segments4 to foresee another" with the end goal of streamlining" and to disco!er which
sections are imperati!e in the relationship. %he relating analysis is called Multiple Regression
Analysis or =artial Eeast S#uares 2=ES4" contingent upon the span of the data table 2a$$ee"
*+(-4.
Analysis
After completing correlation analysis of cancer mortality with indi!idual !ariables" it
-
7/25/2019 Cancer Mortality Analysis Report
30/34
Fig 11. *u%ti%e Regression resu%ts using S4A4 add5in.
30
-
7/25/2019 Cancer Mortality Analysis Report
31/34
Conclusion
'rom abo!e single and multi!ariable analysis we can draw few !aluable conclusions
(4 More than three#uarters 2B;4 of cancer deaths occur in people aged 1 years and o!er" and
more than half 2*4 occur in those aged B years and o!er. Einear regression Model 2Death &
Age 9roup4 has shown accuracy of B3 with data set of )+++.
*4 California State has obser!ed highest death because of cancer. Also" multi linear regression
model has produced result of ;+ which is selfe,planatory for drawing this conclusion.
Future Enhance#ent
31
-
7/25/2019 Cancer Mortality Analysis Report
32/34
Although" we ha!e tried to dig hard some !aluable facts about cancer disease. 8ut" data analysis
is a field which always produces some interesting facts as much you del!e inside it. Same
happened with our team because> in current analysis we ha!e focused mainly on cancer death
rate dependency on different factors 2Mariotto" *++;4. n future we as a team has decided to
analy5e two interesting things which has got satisfactory effect on sur!i!al of cancer patients:
(.4 6ow might physical acti!ity affect cancer sur!i!orship*.4 6ow healthy eating affect cancer sur!i!orship
Ac'nowledge#ent
e would li$e to than$s =rofessor Nohn ang for pro!iding !aluable suggestions in our analysis.
Re%erences
Anderson: *. ;2013
-
7/25/2019 Cancer Mortality Analysis Report
33/34
CDC. ;n.d.>wonder.cdc.gov>!ancer*ort5
v2012.#t+%
!oe%and: G. ;201(
-
7/25/2019 Cancer Mortality Analysis Report
34/34
Ed,e: R. ;200(