Canadian (Non)Exceptionalism: Crisis, Recovery, Austerity

38
Canadian (Non)Exceptionalism: Crisis, Recovery, Austerity Presentation by Jim Stanford Economist, Canadian Auto Workers CLMR Conference, Ryerson U., March 2012

description

Presentation by Jim Stanford - Economist, Canadian Auto Workers at CLMR Conference, Ryerson University, 23 March 2012.

Transcript of Canadian (Non)Exceptionalism: Crisis, Recovery, Austerity

Page 1: Canadian (Non)Exceptionalism: Crisis, Recovery, Austerity

Canadian (Non)Exceptionalism:

Crisis, Recovery, Austerity

Presentation by Jim StanfordEconomist, Canadian Auto Workers

CLMR Conference, Ryerson U., March 2012

Page 2: Canadian (Non)Exceptionalism: Crisis, Recovery, Austerity

Global Financial Crisis

Page 3: Canadian (Non)Exceptionalism: Crisis, Recovery, Austerity

Mother Of All Meltdowns

Page 4: Canadian (Non)Exceptionalism: Crisis, Recovery, Austerity

The Long-Awaited Demise

Of Capitalism

As We Know It

Page 5: Canadian (Non)Exceptionalism: Crisis, Recovery, Austerity

Big …

Page 6: Canadian (Non)Exceptionalism: Crisis, Recovery, Austerity

Where Did This CrisisCome From, Anyway?

Page 7: Canadian (Non)Exceptionalism: Crisis, Recovery, Austerity

Where Did This CrisisCome From, Anyway?

Page 8: Canadian (Non)Exceptionalism: Crisis, Recovery, Austerity

Wha’ Happened?• Speculative bubble (again):

– Centred in U.S. housing

• Fueled by aggressive, irresponsible lending– “NINJA” mortgages

• Speculators borrowed at 50:1 or more• U.S. housing prices began falling in 2006• Chain reaction of collapse, deleveraging• Blow to wealth, confidence, lending,

investment, spending RECESSION• Globalization made things far worse• Global austerity just a new phase of same

crisis.

Page 9: Canadian (Non)Exceptionalism: Crisis, Recovery, Austerity

The Economic “Recovery”…(Has anybody seen it???)

Page 10: Canadian (Non)Exceptionalism: Crisis, Recovery, Austerity

Do the Math

• Official unemployment: 1,500,000• Lost participation: 350,000• Involuntary part-time: 375,000• Waiting for a job to start: 130,000• True unemployment: over 2 million (12%)• No improvement in “employment rate”

since summer 2010.• Canada’s performance has been “ho-

hum”

Page 11: Canadian (Non)Exceptionalism: Crisis, Recovery, Austerity

Employment Rate Decline

61.0%

61.5%

62.0%

62.5%

63.0%

63.5%

64.0%

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Empl

oyed

as

% W

orki

ng A

ge P

op'n

-2.5 pts

+0.4 pts

Page 12: Canadian (Non)Exceptionalism: Crisis, Recovery, Austerity

Mediocre is the Word• Comparisons of Canada to other countries

must take into account our faster population growth.

• Relative to population growth, our performance has been mediocre:– 17 out of 34 in real per capital GDP since 2007– 17 out of 33 in employment rate since 2008

• We did better than others that experienced all-out bank failures:– US, UK, Ireland, Iceland, Italy

• But compared to the rest, we’ve done badly– Germany, Korea, Australia

• Canadian triumphalism rings increasingly hollow.

Page 13: Canadian (Non)Exceptionalism: Crisis, Recovery, Austerity

Change in Real per Capita GDP,

2007-2011

Page 14: Canadian (Non)Exceptionalism: Crisis, Recovery, Austerity

Change in Employment Rate,

2008-2011

Page 15: Canadian (Non)Exceptionalism: Crisis, Recovery, Austerity

The Coming Fiscal Austerity

DON’T FORGET! • Deficits are the consequence of financial

crisis & recession (not “overspending”).– Automatic deficit (less tax in, more EI out).– Stimulus measures.– Bank bail-outs in some countries.

• Slow recovery has undermined budgets.• Now governments and business (who

always wanted cutbacks) are going for blood:– Federal - Provincial - Municipal

Page 16: Canadian (Non)Exceptionalism: Crisis, Recovery, Austerity

Fiscal Math 101

Bad recession+ Lousy Recovery= Deficit

Page 17: Canadian (Non)Exceptionalism: Crisis, Recovery, Austerity

Ontario Provincial Deficit

-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

0

5

2003-4 2004-5 2005-6 2006-7 2007-8 2008-9 2009-10 2010-11

$ Billi

on

Page 18: Canadian (Non)Exceptionalism: Crisis, Recovery, Austerity

Impact of Recession: Ontario

• Double-barreled impact on revenues:– Decline in GDP (8-10% below previous trend)

= $10 billion lost revenue.– Decline in revenue as share of GDP (<1 point)

= $5 billion lost revenue.– Combined fiscal impact: $15 billion.

• Impact on program spending:– Automatic stabilizers (income supports).– Discretionary stimulus.

• Impact on debt service costs:– Follow-through growth of interest costs.– Low interest rates have been helpful.

Page 19: Canadian (Non)Exceptionalism: Crisis, Recovery, Austerity

Canada, Ontario Have No Debt Problem• Debts are low by historical and

international standards.• Deficits are clearly cyclical.• Interest rates are low (and likely to

remain there).• First task: put Canadians back to

work (paying taxes).

Page 20: Canadian (Non)Exceptionalism: Crisis, Recovery, Austerity

Ontario Debt Ratios

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

2002-3 2003-4 2004-5 2005-6 2006-7 2007-8 2008-9 2009-10 2010-11

% of

GDP

Net Debt

Accumulated Deficit

Page 21: Canadian (Non)Exceptionalism: Crisis, Recovery, Austerity

An “Animal Farm” Theoryof Debt

“Private debt good, public debt bad.”• But like any other borrower, public debt makes

sense to finance productive long-lived assets.

Page 22: Canadian (Non)Exceptionalism: Crisis, Recovery, Austerity

Fiscal Math 201:Numerators and Denominators

• Key constraint: debt ratio= Net debt GDP

• Reducing debt ratio requires reduction in the numerator and/or expansion in the denominator.

• Greece: The more they cut, the more GDP shrank, the worse the debt ratio became.

• Normal recovery? Ratio falls via denominator.• Crucial task: start the engine of true recovery.

Page 23: Canadian (Non)Exceptionalism: Crisis, Recovery, Austerity

But Where’s the Engine??

Page 24: Canadian (Non)Exceptionalism: Crisis, Recovery, Austerity

Growth Needs an Engine…

• Some sector must lead the way with leading injections of expenditure (hopefully productive).

• Resulting employment and income leads to circular generation of more employment and more income.

• In a credit money system, the leading sector must also be borrowing…Creating the new money needed to buy

new output.

Page 25: Canadian (Non)Exceptionalism: Crisis, Recovery, Austerity

Possible Engines• Investment (business, government)• Exports• Construction (private, public)• War (hope not!)• Public works• Consumers?

– Rarely, because consumer spending usually follows cycles (and amplifies them), not leads.

Page 26: Canadian (Non)Exceptionalism: Crisis, Recovery, Austerity

How It’s Supposed to Work…

• Businesses borrow funds, put money into motion in the real economy.

• Resulting stimulus generates employment and income several times over.

• Real production, productivity, and innovation are supposed to result.

• We can argue over the terms (wages, taxes, regulations)…… but no arguing about the “engine”:

private capital accumulation.

Page 27: Canadian (Non)Exceptionalism: Crisis, Recovery, Austerity

What’s Gone Wrong• Businesses are investing too little.

– Not even reinvesting their cash flow.• Businesses are channeling excess cash

back into the financial system.• Financial innovation, speculation, and

credit creation become a sideshow.– Irrelevant to real production at best,

destructive at worst.• Consumers become the default engine.

– Fueled by rising consumer debt.• Government stimulus can only do so

much.

Page 28: Canadian (Non)Exceptionalism: Crisis, Recovery, Austerity

GDP by Domestic Sector

70

80

90

100

110

120

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Cycl

e Pe

ak =

100

Government

Consumers

BusinessInvestment

Page 29: Canadian (Non)Exceptionalism: Crisis, Recovery, Austerity

A Growing Hoard

$300

$350

$400

$450

$500

$550

$600

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Cash

and

Sho

rt-Te

rm A

sset

s ($

bil)

Non-FinancialCorporations

Page 30: Canadian (Non)Exceptionalism: Crisis, Recovery, Austerity

Signs of a Structural Problem

• Profit-driven private capital accumulation cannot generate enough work to fully utilize our human resources.

• Long-run consequences:– Chronic labour market weakness– Sluggish innovation, productivity growth,

competitiveness– Excess financial capital

• Canada is not alone: U.S., Japan, others• Where’s the engine???• Need to go “beyond stimulus” to address

this bigger structural economic problem.

Page 31: Canadian (Non)Exceptionalism: Crisis, Recovery, Austerity

Job Creation Strategies• Without recovery, deficits will remain.• Traditional engine of growth (private

sector investment) is not working.• Labour needs visionary, credible

alternatives:– Avoid spending cuts; expand public services.– Longer-run capital / infrastructure spending.– Targeted sector strategies.– Other novel ways to channel investment:

• Government as venture capital funder??? [Shiller]• Social sector / co-ops / other non-profits???

Page 32: Canadian (Non)Exceptionalism: Crisis, Recovery, Austerity

Our Economic “To-Do” List

• Explain where this crisis came from– It wasn’t caused by workers– It was caused by finance– It wasn’t a random accident– It will happen again, if rules aren’t

changed

• Reclaim the value & legitimacy of real work and production

• Resist attempts to make us pay• Fight for an alternative economic vision

that puts production ahead of finance

Page 33: Canadian (Non)Exceptionalism: Crisis, Recovery, Austerity

Taking Back Credit1. Regulate finance:

• Ban dangerous, unproductive activity.• Require safer practices (leveraging, quality

of debt, firewalls, globalization).

2. Tax finance:• Tobin tax?• Corporate income tax: 3% = $1.5 b/yr.• Eliminate tax subsidies.

3. Take back finance:• We can create money out of thin air as well

as a private bank can.• Use that power for production, not

speculation.

Page 34: Canadian (Non)Exceptionalism: Crisis, Recovery, Austerity

Watch Out…WE are Now the Target

• Conservatives have exploited fear, confusion, and power over media to blame workers (esp. public sector) for crisis caused by private finance.

– “Shock Doctrine” (Naomi Klein)

• Now they will try to make US pay for a crisis THEY created.

– Especially union members

• Foster inequality & envy among workers.– “Divide and conquer.”– “Misery loves company.”

Page 35: Canadian (Non)Exceptionalism: Crisis, Recovery, Austerity

Declare “War,” End Recession

• 1939: Recession ended immediately– Enormous social challenge– Side-stepped profit motive for initiating

work and production

• 2011: Do it again:– Declare war on pollution, poverty

Page 36: Canadian (Non)Exceptionalism: Crisis, Recovery, Austerity

We Produce… …They Don’t

We Didn’t Cause the Crisis…They Did

Page 37: Canadian (Non)Exceptionalism: Crisis, Recovery, Austerity

www.policyalternatives.ca“Canada’s Incomplete, Mediocre Recovery”

www.economicsforeveryone.ca

Twitter: @JimboStanfordFacebook: Jimbo Stanford

Page 38: Canadian (Non)Exceptionalism: Crisis, Recovery, Austerity

Canadian (Non)Exceptionalism:

Crisis, Recovery, Austerity

Presentation by Jim StanfordEconomist, Canadian Auto Workers

CLMR Conference, Ryerson U., March 2012