Canadian English LING 202, Fall 2007 Dr. Tony Pi Week 4 - Techniques.

17
Canadian English LING 202, Fall 2007 Dr. Tony Pi Week 4 - Techniques

Transcript of Canadian English LING 202, Fall 2007 Dr. Tony Pi Week 4 - Techniques.

Page 1: Canadian English LING 202, Fall 2007 Dr. Tony Pi Week 4 - Techniques.

Canadian English

LING 202, Fall 2007

Dr. Tony Pi

Week 4 - Techniques

Page 2: Canadian English LING 202, Fall 2007 Dr. Tony Pi Week 4 - Techniques.

What is Sociolinguistics?

• Sociolinguistics: the study of language in society; languages and the people who use them.

• "pragmatic [=sociolinguistic] competence is knowledge of conditions and manner of appropriateuse, in conformity with various purposes.... We might say that pragmatic competence places language in the institutional setting of its use, relating intentions and purposes to the linguisticmeans at hand." (Chomsky 1980)

• "Somehow, young children have a theory of society and a theory of language, and they are ableto link them up in some fashion to indicate that you speak this language in this situation." (Chomsky 1988)

Page 3: Canadian English LING 202, Fall 2007 Dr. Tony Pi Week 4 - Techniques.

Observer’s Paradox

• Our goal is to observe the way people use language when they are not being observed. How do we do this?

Page 4: Canadian English LING 202, Fall 2007 Dr. Tony Pi Week 4 - Techniques.

Accommodation Theory

• Speech Convergence: polite speech strategy – speech accommodation occurs when speaker intent

on putting another at ease– implies addressee's speech is acceptable and worth

imitating– can converge in content, linguistic proficiency,

pronunciation, level of jargon– can converge speech upwards (in social standing) or

downwards• example: Montreal: Francophones speaking English in

stores to make sales

Page 5: Canadian English LING 202, Fall 2007 Dr. Tony Pi Week 4 - Techniques.

Collecting Data

• public speech, including mass media• rapid anonymous interviews• unsystematic observations• Contextual style

– CS casual style– IS interview style– RP reading passage style– WL word list style– MP minimal pairs

Page 6: Canadian English LING 202, Fall 2007 Dr. Tony Pi Week 4 - Techniques.

Critical Age Hypothesis

• The language faculty of children is fluid until the onset of adolescence– roughly between ages of 2-13– where a person grows up is likely to

determine his dialect– vocabulary and pronunciation less likely to

change after the critical age

Page 7: Canadian English LING 202, Fall 2007 Dr. Tony Pi Week 4 - Techniques.

Apparent Time vs. Real Time

• Real time: comparisons of different time periods to see if any changes have occurred

• Apparent-time: comparing different generations; comparisons at same time period (using critical age hypothesis)– Apparent Time Hypothesis: because language is

more or less fixed after a certain age, you can estimate the state of a dialect form by looking at the speech patterns of people of different ages

– S-curve indicate change in progress. – Bell-curve typical of stable variation.

Page 8: Canadian English LING 202, Fall 2007 Dr. Tony Pi Week 4 - Techniques.

Age-Grading vs. Actual Change

– Age-grading: not an actual change. This is a pronunciation or word that you grow out of using. If you compare how people use this variant in ten, twenty, fifty years, the graph will look the same.

– Change in progress: an actual change in how people speak is occurring. More and more peoplelearn the word or pronunciation (or fewer and fewer use it), and the percentage of people usingthe word in that generation remains practically the same. That means that the graph will not look the same ten, twenty, fifty years in the future. We will discuss how these graphs differ in more detail, and see the graphs online (q62).

Page 9: Canadian English LING 202, Fall 2007 Dr. Tony Pi Week 4 - Techniques.

Zee and Zed Revisited

• In the online article, Zee and Zed, the phenomenon of age-grading is discussed. We will discuss the difference between age-grading and an actual change in progress.

Page 10: Canadian English LING 202, Fall 2007 Dr. Tony Pi Week 4 - Techniques.

Canadian-American Shibboleths

• anti• asphalt• avenue• facecloth• lever• mum• pop• semi• shone• tap• vase• zed• couch/sofa/chesterfield

Page 11: Canadian English LING 202, Fall 2007 Dr. Tony Pi Week 4 - Techniques.

Tap/Faucet

• tap > OF taper to cork, bung, plug > Frankish *tappon. (Same stem was nasalized in MF as tampon, from which MnF tamponner to stop up, bung, plug, and MnE tampon.)

• faucet > MF fausset n > OProv falsar v to falsify, create a fault in, bore through > LL falsare to falsify

tap faucet both– Avis (1954) 89.5% 5.5% 5.0%

tap faucet spigot– S&W (1972) adults 91 8 1– Ont. teens 91 7 2

Page 12: Canadian English LING 202, Fall 2007 Dr. Tony Pi Week 4 - Techniques.

Anti

• Anti(S&W 1972) ant[i] ant[ai] both

adults 78% 18% 4%

students 75% 17% 8%

(GH 1992)

Canadians 87.9% 12.0%

Americans 21.2% 78.7%

Page 13: Canadian English LING 202, Fall 2007 Dr. Tony Pi Week 4 - Techniques.

Yod-Dropping

• In the online article, Yod-Dropping, the phenomenon of yod-dropping is discussed for one region of the Dialect Topography survey.

• yod-dropping: the (ju) variable

ANTERIOR CORONAL DORSAL

pew tune cute

beauty dew argue

few suit, enthusiasm hew

view exude

music news

lute

NEVER YOD-DROP DROPPED MOST OF THE TIME

NEVER YOD-DROP

Page 14: Canadian English LING 202, Fall 2007 Dr. Tony Pi Week 4 - Techniques.

Hypercorrection

• Hypercorrection: In northern Ontario, there is a dialectal variant which inserts the yod where it shouldn't belong (moon as myoon, noon as nyoon).

• This is due to the fact that the yod-pronunciation is viewed as the prestige pronunciation. We will look at examples from the DT database (q36 avenue, q42 news, q52 student)

Page 15: Canadian English LING 202, Fall 2007 Dr. Tony Pi Week 4 - Techniques.

Regionality

• "Dialectologists stipulated nonmobility because they assumed that mobility is a great leveler of accent and dialect. When people from different regions come together, they bring with them numerous differences, great and small, some in their speech. This mixing has long been recognized as a force in language change but so far only impressionistically. To explore it empirically, we need to treat region as an independent variable and try to discover how the speech features imported by outsiders figure in linguistic variation and change."

– Chambers, Region and Language Variation

Page 16: Canadian English LING 202, Fall 2007 Dr. Tony Pi Week 4 - Techniques.

Regionality Index

• Calculating RI:– the place where the subject was raised from 8 to 18:

base score 1– the place where the subject was born: + 0-2

(0 if same place, 1 if same province, 2 if elsewhere)

– the place where the subject lives now: + 0-2– the place where subject’s parents were born: + 0-2

scale from 1 to 7: – indigenes = 1 (best representatives of the region); – interlopers = 7 (poorest representatives)

Page 17: Canadian English LING 202, Fall 2007 Dr. Tony Pi Week 4 - Techniques.

Regionality Index (Adjusted)

• To calculate RI across all DT databases, where the subject lives has to be the constant factor.– Changes

• the place where the subject lives now: base score 1 • the place where the subject was born: + 0-2

(0 if same place, 1 if same province, 2 if elsewhere)• the place where the subject was raised from 8 to 18: +0-2

the place where subject’s parents were born: + 0-2