Can People Be Humanly Sane and Not Unite as the Invincible Triad Against the Trilateral Commission

7/31/2019 Can People Be Humanly Sane and Not Unite as the Invincible Triad Against the Trilateral Commission

1/14

Can people be humanly sane and not unite as the Invincible Triad against the Trilateral Commission

Etc

Thoroughly documented in two case scenarios Victim and now the Accused deliberately caused my

arrest to bring the evidencewww.cdfji.ca before the courts, proving irrefutably they are not COC JIJCourt of Competent Jurisdiction Independent Judiciarywww.frankygoestocourt.com

Terres Trialswww.2012t-t.com

1
http://www.cdfji.ca/http://www.cdfji.ca/http://www.frankygoestocourt.com/http://www.frankygoestocourt.com/http://www.2012t-t.com/http://www.cdfji.ca/http://www.frankygoestocourt.com/http://www.2012t-t.com/


2/14

Traditional Rhetoric Instil Belief Unscrupulous Nuances Artificial Logistics

They appoint the establishment enacting routinely followed while suggesting they are to protect the

people from their policies

Thoroughly documentedwww.cdfji.ca

Personal case scenario

God rest ye merry gentlemen

Carol

Constitution Act Rule of Law

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitution_Act,_1982

The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms is a bill of rights.The Charter is intended to

protect certain political and civil rights of people in Canada

****from****the policies and actions of all levels of government.It is also supposed to unify Canadians around a set of principles that embody those rights.[3][4]

The Charter was preceded by theCanadian Bill of Rights, which was introduced by the government ofJohnDiefenbakerin 1960.

However, the Bill of Rights was only a federal statute, rather than a constitutional document.Therefore, it was limited in scope and was easily amendable. This motivated some within government to improve

rights protections in Canada.The movement forhuman rights and freedoms that emerged afterWorld War IIalso wanted to entrench the

principles enunciated in the

Universal Declaration of Human Rights.[5]

Hence, the government ofPrime MinisterPierre Trudeau enacted the Charter in 1982.


3/14

and

The Rule of Law

The following was extracted from the Law Society of Upper Canada - Lawyers Rules of Conduct

103) Interpretation

(f) rules of professional conduct cannot address every situation, and a lawyer should observe the rules in the spirit as

well as in the letter.

Rule of Lawhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rule_of_law

The Rule of law in its most basic form is no one is above the law.Perhaps the most important application of the rule of law is the principle that governmental

authority is legitimately exercised only in accordance with,publicly disclosed laws,

adopted and enforced in accordance with established procedural steps that are referred to asdue process.

The rule of law is hostile to dictatorship and to anarchy.According to modern Anglo-American thinking, hallmarks of adherence to the rule of law

commonly include

a clear separation of powers,legal certainty, the principle of legitimate expectation and equality of all before the law.

The concept is not without controversy, and it has been said that "the phrase the rule of law

has become meaningless thanks to ideological abuse and general over- use"

publicly disclosed laws52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is inconsistent with the

provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of no force or effect.

Guarantee of Rights and Freedoms

1. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the rights and freedoms set out in itsubject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and

democratic society.2. Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms: (a) freedom of conscience and religion; (b)

freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media ofcommunication; (c) freedom of peaceful assembly; and (d) freedom of association.

7. Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of the person and the right not to be deprivedthereof except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice.

15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection andequal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on race,

national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability.24. (1) Anyone whose rights or freedoms, as guaranteed by this Charter, have been infringed or

denied may apply to a court of competent jurisdiction to obtain such remedy as the court considersappropriate and just in the circumstances.

31. Nothing in this Charter extends the legislative powers of any body or authority32. (1) This Charter applies (a) to the Parliament and government of Canada in respect of all matterswithin the authority of Parliament including all matters relating to the Yukon Territory and Northwest

Territories; and (b) to the legislature and government of each province in respect of all matters withinthe authority of the legislature of each province.

3
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rule_of_lawhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rule_of_law


4/14

52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is inconsistentwith the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of no force or effect.

Roles and Responsibilities of the AttorneyGeneral

The Attorney General has a unique role to play as a Minister.

One part of the Attorney General's role is that of a Cabinet Minister. In this capacity the Minister is responsible forrepresenting the interests and perspectives of the Ministry at Cabinet, while simultaneously representing theinterests and perspectives of Cabinet and consequently the Government to the Ministry and the Ministry's

communities of interest.The Attorney General is the chief law officer of the Executive Council. The responsibilities stemming from this role

are unlike those of any other Cabinet member. The role has been referred to as"judicial-like" and as the "guardian of the public interest".

Much has been written on the subject of ministerial responsibilities and the unique role of the Attorney General.

There are various components of the Attorney General's role. The Attorney General has unique responsibilities tothe Crown, the courts, the Legislature and the executive branch of government. While there are different

emphases and nuances attached to these there is a general theme throughout all the various aspects of theAttorney General's responsibilities that the office has a constitutional and traditional responsibility beyond that of a

political minister.

The statutory responsibilities of the office are found in section 5 of the Ministry of the Attorney General Act.Section 5 states:

The Attorney General,(a) is the Law Officer of the Executive Council;

(b) shall see that the administration of public affairs is in accordance with the law;(c) shall superintend all matters connected with the administration of justice in Ontario;

(d) shall perform the duties and have the powers that belong to the Attorney General and Solicitor General ofEngland by law and usage, so far as those powers and duties are applicable to Ontario, and also shall perform theduties and powers that, until the Constitution Act, 1867came into effect, belonged to the offices of the Attorney

General and Solicitor General in the provinces of Canada and Upper Canada and which, under the provisions ofthat Act, are within the scope of the powers of the Legislature;

(e) shall advise the Government upon all matters of law connected with legislative enactments and upon allmatters of law referred to him or her by the Government;

(f) shall advise the Government upon all matters of a legislative nature and superintend all Government measuresof a legislative nature;

(g) shall advise the heads of ministries and agencies of Government upon all matters of law connected with suchministries and agency;

(h) shall conduct and regulate all litigation for and against the Crown or any ministry or agency of government inrespect of any subject within the authority or jurisdiction of the Legislature;

(i) shall superintend all matters connected with judicial offices;(j) shall perform such other functions as are assigned to him or her by the Legislature or by the Lieutenant

Governor in Council. "

What follows is an overview of the various components of the Attorney General's roles and responsibilities,primarily as outlined in the Act.

Chief Law Officer of the Executive Council (s. 5(a))

4


5/14

The role of chief law officer might be referred to as the Attorney General's overall responsibility as theindependent legal advisor to the Cabinet - and some have even suggested that the role possibly

extends to the Legislature as well. The importance of the independence of the role is fundamental tothe position and well established in common law, statutes and tradition.

As chief law officer, the Attorney General has a special responsibility to be the guardian of that mostelusive concept - the rule of law. The rule of law is a well established legal principle, but hard to easily

define. It is the rule of law that protects individuals, and society as a whole, from arbitrary measuresand safeguards personal liberties.

The Attorney General has a special role to play in advising Cabinet to ensure the rule of law ismaintained and that Cabinet actions are legally and constitutionally valid.

In providing such advice it is important to keep in mind the distinction between the Attorney General'spolicy advice and preference and the legal advice being presented to Cabinet. The Attorney General'slegal advice or constitutional advice should not be lightly disregarded. The Attorney General's policy

advice has the same weight as that of other ministers.

Criminal prosecutions (s.5(d))

One of the most publicly scrutinized aspects of the Attorney General's role is the responsibility forcriminal prosecutions encompassed in section 5 (d) and s. 92 of the Constitution Act, 1867. Section92 gives the provinces authority to legislate in matters related to the administration of criminal justiceand thereby gives the provincial Attorney General authority to prosecute offences under the Criminal

Code.

The Attorney General does not, however, direct or cause charges to be laid. While the AttorneyGeneral and the Attorney General's agents may provide legal advice to the police, the ultimate

decision whether or not to lay charges is for the police. Once the charge is laid the decision as towhether the prosecution should proceed, and in what manner, is for the Attorney General and the

Crown Attorney.

It is now an accepted and important constitutional principle that the Attorney General must carry outthe Minister's criminal prosecution responsibilities independent of Cabinet and of any partisan political

pressures. The Attorney General's responsibility for individual criminal prosecutions must beundertaken - and seen to be undertaken - on strictly objective and legal criteria, free of any political

considerations. Whether to initiate or stay a criminal proceeding is not an issue of government policy.This responsibility has been characterized as a matter of the Attorney General acting as the Queen's

Attorney - not as a Minister of the government of the day.

This is not to suggest that decisions regarding criminal prosecutions are made in a complete vacuum.A wide range of policy considerations may be weighed in executing this responsibility, and the

Attorney General may choose to consult the Cabinet on some of these considerations. However anydecisions relating to the conduct of individual prosecutions must be the Attorney General's alone andindependent of the traditional Cabinet decision making process. In practice, in the vast majority of

cases, these decisions are made by the Attorney General's agents, the Crown Attorneys.

An important part of the Crown's - and thus the Attorney General's - responsibility in conductingcriminal prosecutions is associated with the responsibility to represent the public interest - which

includes not only the community as a whole and the victim, but also the accused. The Crown has adistinct responsibility to the court to present all the credible evidence available.

5


6/14

The responsibility is to present the case fairly - not necessarily to convict. This is a fundamentalprecept of criminal law, even if it is not a particularly well-understood concept among the general

public. One of the Attorney General's responsibilities in fostering public respect for the rule of law, is toassist the public in understanding the nature and limits of the prosecutorial function.

Ultimately the Attorney General is accountable to the people of the province, through the Legislature,for decisions relating to criminal prosecutions. Such accountability can only occur, of course, once the

prosecution is completed or when a final decision has been made not to prosecute. The sub judicaerule bars any comment on a matter before the courts that is likely to influence the matter. The sub

judicae rule strictly prohibits the Attorney General from commenting on prosecutions that are beforethe courts. Given the stature of the Attorney General's position, any public comment coming from the

office would be seen as an attempt to influence the case.

Although the Attorney general can become involved in decision-making in relation to individualcriminal cases, such a practice would leave the Minister vulnerable to accusations of political

interference. Accordingly, it is traditional to leave the day-to-day decision-making in the hands of theAttorney General's agents, the Crown Attorneys, except in cases of exceptional importance where the

public would expect the Attorney General to be briefed.

Legislative Responsibilities (s. 5(e) and (f))

The Attorney General has broad responsibilities associated with Government legislation. Theseresponsibilities have been described as twofold. One is to oversee that all legislative enactments are

in accordance with principles of natural justice and civil rights (see also s. 5(b) above). This isobviously an important and broad area of responsibility. The second aspect of this responsibility is to

advise on the constitutionality and legality of legislation.

The Attorney General's legislative responsibilities are played out in a variety roles. The Office ofLegislative Counsel reports to the Attorney General. Legislative Counsel plays a key role in ensuringthe legal integrity of Government legislation. Although the Legislative Counsel's reporting relationship

to the Attorney General does allow the Attorney General to provide guidance and set standards,individual pieces of legislation are drafted on instructions from client ministries and are not within thesole control of Legislative Counsel or the Attorney General. It should also be noted that Legislative

Counsel also has a direct responsibility to the Legislature as the Office also drafts all privatemember's bills.

The Attorney General has a further role to play as part of whatever Cabinet Committee is formed toreview legislation and regulations. Here the Minister has an opportunity to comment on the technical

issues related to legislation and regulations prior to Cabinet consideration.

The Attorney General's role on legislative matters is as an adviser to the Cabinet. Although unlikely,Cabinet could, in theory, receive the Attorney General's legal opinion on legislation and choose to

disregard it. The Attorney General's role is not independent of Cabinet decision making as in the areaof criminal prosecutions. As was noted earlier, the Attorney General must make careful distinctions

about the legal opinions and policy or political preferences being offered about legislation.

Civil Litigation (s.5(h) and (d))

In addition to the specific responsibilities to conduct civil litigation on behalf of the Government and itsagencies (s. 5(h)), the Attorney General has broader litigation responsibilities flowing from the

historical powers of the Attorney General referred to in s. 5(d) of the Act. These powers are based onthe Crown's parens patriae (parental) authority. The Attorney General's authority, therefore, is not only

6


7/14

to conduct litigation in cases directly affecting the government or its agencies but also to litigate caseswhere there is a clear matter of public interest or public rights at stake.

This has been characterized as a constitutional responsibility to ensure that the public interest is welland independently represented. It may involve interventions in private litigation or Charter challenges

to legislation, even if the arguments conclude that the legislation does contravene constitutionallyprotected rights.

Responsibility for Court Administration (s. 5(c))

A key component of the Attorney General's responsibilities to ensure the administration of justice inthe province is the administration of the courts and as a result the responsibility for maintaining liaison

with the judiciary.

Given the fundamental importance of the independence of the judiciary, the responsibility for courts administrationis often a very sensitive and delicate issue. Great care and respect for the principles of judicial independence must

be exercised in this area.


8/14

early Modern period, alongside the European secularization of Judeo-Christian ethics.[7] Thetrue forerunner of human rights discourse was the concept ofnatural rights which appeared

as part of the medieval Natural law tradition that became prominent during the Enlightenmentwith such philosophers as John Locke, Francis Hutcheson, and Jean-Jacques Burlamaqui,

and featured prominently in the political discourse of theAmerican Revolution and the FrenchRevolution.

From this foundation, the modern human rights arguments emerged over the latter half of thetwentieth century. Gelling as social activism and political rhetoric in many nations put it high

on the world agenda.[8]

All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed withreason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood.

Article 1 of the United NationsUniversal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR)[9]

Universal Declaration of Human Rights

NOT LEGALLY BINDING

The pursuit of human rights was a central reason for creating the UN. World War II atrocitiesand genocide led to a ready consensus that the new organization must work to prevent any

similar tragedies in the future. An early objective was creating a legal framework forconsidering and acting on complaints about human rights violations. The UN Charter obligesall member nations to promote "universal respect for, and observance of, human rights" andto take "joint and separate action" to that end. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights,

though not legally binding,was adopted by the General Assembly in 1948 as a common standard of achievement for all.The Assembly regularly takes up human rights issues.

A large share of UN expenditures addresses the core UN mission of peace and security. Thepeacekeeping budget for the 20052006 fiscal year was approximately US$5 billion, 2.5

billion (compared to approximately US$1.5 billion, 995 million for the UN core budget overthe same period), with some 70,000 troops deployed in 17 missions around the world. [60]UN

peace operations are funded by assessments, using a formula derived from the regularfunding scale, but including a weighted surcharge for the five permanent Security Councilmembers, who must approve all peacekeeping operations. This surcharge serves to offset

discounted peacekeeping assessment rates for less developed countries. As of 1 January2011, the top 10 providers of assessed financial contributions to United Nationspeacekeeping operations were: the United States, Japan, the United Kingdom, Germany,

France, Italy, China, Canada, Spain and the Republic of Korea.[61]

Special UN programmes not included in the regular budget (such as UNICEF, the WFP andUNDP) are financed by voluntary contributions from other member governments. Most of this

is financial contributions, but some is in the form of agricultural commodities donated forafflicted populations. Since their funding is voluntary, many of these agencies suffer severe

8
http://69.6.212.16:8080/wiki/Early_Modern_periodhttp://69.6.212.16:8080/studio/servlet/psoft.masonry.Builder#cite_note-Ishay64-6http://69.6.212.16:8080/wiki/Natural_and_legal_rightshttp://69.6.212.16:8080/wiki/Natural_lawhttp://69.6.212.16:8080/wiki/Age_of_Enlightenmenthttp://69.6.212.16:8080/wiki/John_Lockehttp://69.6.212.16:8080/wiki/Francis_Hutcheson_(philosopher)http://69.6.212.16:8080/wiki/Jean-Jacques_Burlamaquihttp://69.6.212.16:8080/wiki/American_Revolutionhttp://69.6.212.16:8080/wiki/French_Revolutionhttp://69.6.212.16:8080/wiki/French_Revolutionhttp://69.6.212.16:8080/studio/servlet/psoft.masonry.Builder#cite_note-7http://69.6.212.16:8080/wiki/United_Nationshttp://69.6.212.16:8080/wiki/Universal_Declaration_of_Human_Rightshttp://69.6.212.16:8080/studio/servlet/psoft.masonry.Builder#cite_note-UDHR-8http://98.130.254.179:8080/wiki/Genocidehttp://98.130.254.179:8080/wiki/Universal_Declaration_of_Human_Rightshttp://98.130.254.179:8080/studio/servlet/psoft.masonry.Builder?action=edit&page_id=17&_frame=body&template=/simple/generic/htmleditor.body#cite_note-PeaceKeepingOps-59http://98.130.254.179:8080/studio/servlet/psoft.masonry.Builder?action=edit&page_id=17&_frame=body&template=/simple/generic/htmleditor.body#cite_note-PeaceKeepingOps-59http://98.130.254.179:8080/studio/servlet/psoft.masonry.Builder?action=edit&page_id=17&_frame=body&template=/simple/generic/htmleditor.body#cite_note-60http://98.130.254.179:8080/wiki/UNICEFhttp://98.130.254.179:8080/wiki/World_Food_Programmehttp://98.130.254.179:8080/wiki/United_Nations_Development_Programmehttp://98.130.254.179:8080/wiki/Commodityhttp://69.6.212.16:8080/wiki/Early_Modern_periodhttp://69.6.212.16:8080/studio/servlet/psoft.masonry.Builder#cite_note-Ishay64-6http://69.6.212.16:8080/wiki/Natural_and_legal_rightshttp://69.6.212.16:8080/wiki/Natural_lawhttp://69.6.212.16:8080/wiki/Age_of_Enlightenmenthttp://69.6.212.16:8080/wiki/John_Lockehttp://69.6.212.16:8080/wiki/Francis_Hutcheson_(philosopher)http://69.6.212.16:8080/wiki/Jean-Jacques_Burlamaquihttp://69.6.212.16:8080/wiki/American_Revolutionhttp://69.6.212.16:8080/wiki/French_Revolutionhttp://69.6.212.16:8080/wiki/French_Revolutionhttp://69.6.212.16:8080/studio/servlet/psoft.masonry.Builder#cite_note-7http://69.6.212.16:8080/wiki/United_Nationshttp://69.6.212.16:8080/wiki/Universal_Declaration_of_Human_Rightshttp://69.6.212.16:8080/studio/servlet/psoft.masonry.Builder#cite_note-UDHR-8http://98.130.254.179:8080/wiki/Genocidehttp://98.130.254.179:8080/wiki/Universal_Declaration_of_Human_Rightshttp://98.130.254.179:8080/studio/servlet/psoft.masonry.Builder?action=edit&page_id=17&_frame=body&template=/simple/generic/htmleditor.body#cite_note-PeaceKeepingOps-59http://98.130.254.179:8080/studio/servlet/psoft.masonry.Builder?action=edit&page_id=17&_frame=body&template=/simple/generic/htmleditor.body#cite_note-60http://98.130.254.179:8080/wiki/UNICEFhttp://98.130.254.179:8080/wiki/World_Food_Programmehttp://98.130.254.179:8080/wiki/United_Nations_Development_Programmehttp://98.130.254.179:8080/wiki/Commodity


9/14

shortages during economic recessions.In July 2009, the World Food Programme reported that it has been forced to cut services

because of insufficient funding.[62]It has received barely a quarter of the total it needed for the 09/10 financial year.

Many of the basic ideas that animated the movement developed in the aftermath of theSecond World Warand the

atrocities of the Holocaust, culminating in the adoption of the

Universal Declaration of Human

Rightsin Paris by the United Nations General Assembly in 1948. The ancient world did not possess the conceptof universal human rights.[5] Ancient societies had "elaborate systems of duties... conceptions of justice,

political legitimacy, and human flourishing that sought to realize human dignity, flourishing, or well-

being entirely independent of human rights".[6]The modern concept of human rights developed duringthe early Modern period, alongside the European secularization of Judeo-Christian ethics.[7] The true

forerunner of human rights discourse was the concept ofnatural rights which appeared as part of the

medievalNatural law tradition, became prominent during the Enlightenment with such philosophers asJohn Locke, Francis Hutcheson, andJean-Jacques Burlamaqui, and featured prominently in the political

discourse of theAmerican Revolution and the French Revolution.

Multinational companies play an increasingly large role in the world, and have been responsible for

numerous human rights abuses.[52] Although the legal and moral environment surrounding the actionsof governments is reasonably well developed, that surrounding multinational companies is both

controversial and ill-defined.[citation needed] Multinational companies' primary responsibility is to their

shareholders, not to those affected by their actions. Such companies may be larger than the economies ofsome of the states within which they operate, and can wield significant economic and political power. Nointernational treaties exist to specifically cover the behavior of companies with regard to human rights,

and national legislation is very variable. Jean Ziegler, Special Rapporteur of the UN Commission on

Human Rights on the right to food stated in a report in 2003:

In August 2003 the Human Rights Commission's Sub-Commission on the Promotion and Protection of HumanRights produced draft Norms on the responsibilities of transnational corporations and other business enterpriseswith regard to human rights.[54]These were considered by the Human Rights Commission in 2004,

but have no binding status on corporations and are notmonitored.[55]


10/14

within the scope of this Act or having to do in any way with the practice of law in Ontario or the

provision of legal services in Ontario, and for this purpose he or she may at any time require theproduction of any document or thing pertaining to the affairs of the Society. R.S.O. 1990, c. L.8,

s. 13 (1); 1998, c. 21, s. 7 (1); 2006, c. 21, Sched. C, s. 13.

Admissions

(2) No admission of any person in any document or thing produced under subsection (1) is admissible inevidence against that person in any proceedings other than proceedings under this Act. R.S.O. 1990,

c. L.8, s. 13 (2); 1998, c. 21, s. 7 (2).

Protection of Minister

(3) No person who is or has been the Attorney General for Ontario is subject to any proceedings of the

Society or to any penalty imposed under this Act for anything done by him or her while exercising thefunctions of such office. R.S.O. 1990, c. L.8, s. 13 (3); 1998, c. 21, s. 7 (3).

eakNewLine]-->

www.sapboat.comSanity a popular Belief of artificial Truths

DTs

Democratic Tyrannyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democracy

Popular sovereignty or the sovereignty of the peopleis

the beliefthat the legitimacy of the state is created by the will orconsent of its people, who are the source of all

political power.

It is closely associated to thesocial contract philosophers, among whom areThomas Hobbes, John

Locke andJean-Jacques Rousseau.Popular sovereignty expresses a concept and does not necessarily reflect or describe a political reality.[1]

It is often contrasted with the concept ofparliamentary sovereignty, and with individual sovereignty.

10
http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/statutes/french/elaws_statutes_90l08_f.htm#s13s2http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/statutes/french/elaws_statutes_90l08_f.htm#s13s3http://www.sapboat.com/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democracyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sovereign_statehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consent_of_the_governedhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_powerhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_contracthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_contracthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Hobbeshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Hobbeshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Lockehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Lockehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jean-Jacques_Rousseauhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jean-Jacques_Rousseauhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Popular_sovereignty#cite_note-0http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parliamentary_sovereigntyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Individual_sovereigntyhttp://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/statutes/french/elaws_statutes_90l08_f.htm#s13s2http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/statutes/french/elaws_statutes_90l08_f.htm#s13s3http://www.sapboat.com/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democracyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sovereign_statehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consent_of_the_governedhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_powerhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_contracthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Hobbeshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Lockehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Lockehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jean-Jacques_Rousseauhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Popular_sovereignty#cite_note-0http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parliamentary_sovereigntyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Individual_sovereignty


11/14

Majority ruleis often listed as a characteristic of democracy.

However, it is also possible for aminority to be oppressed by a

"tyranny of the majority"in the absence of governmental or constitutional protections of individual and/or group rights.

An essential part of an "ideal" representative democracy is competitive elections that are fair both

substantively[15] and procedurally.[16]

Furthermore, freedom of political expression,freedom of speech, and freedom of the press are

considered to be essential, so that citizens are adequately informedand able to vote according to their own best interests as they see them.[17][18]

It has also been suggested that a basic feature of democracy is the capacity of individuals to participatefreely and fully in the life of their society.[19]

Uncle Sam vs Uncle

TOMTyranny of Majority

SEE

11
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Majority_rulehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Majority_rulehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minorityhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minorityhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tyranny_of_the_majorityhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electionshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democracy#cite_note-14http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democracy#cite_note-14http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democracy#cite_note-15http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_(political)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_speechhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_speechhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_speechhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_the_presshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democracy#cite_note-Barak27-16http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democracy#cite_note-17http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democracy#cite_note-18http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Majority_rulehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minorityhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tyranny_of_the_majorityhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electionshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democracy#cite_note-14http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democracy#cite_note-15http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_(political)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_speechhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_the_presshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democracy#cite_note-Barak27-16http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democracy#cite_note-17http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democracy#cite_note-18


12/14

Self Exploiting Enslavement

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E8lygVXgumY&feature=relatedVatican Rome Italy - The Crown Corporate State of London, London England - District of

Columbia Washington USA

Implicit Complicit Explicit

ICE

Insidious Capitalist Emperors

Like other financial empires in history, Smith claims the contemporary model forms alliances necessary

to develop and control wealth,

as peripheral nations remain impoverished providers of cheap resources for the imperial-centers-of-

capital.[1]Belloc estimated that, during the British Enclosures, "perhaps half of the whole population was

proletarian",

while roughly the other "half" owned and controlled the means of production. Now, under modernCapitalism, J.W. Smith claims

fewer than 500 people possess more wealth than half of the earths population,

as the wealth of 1/2 of 1-percent of the United States population roughly equal that of the lower 90-percent.

12
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E8lygVXgumY&feature=relatedhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_democracy#cite_note-SmithED-0%23cite_note-SmithED-0http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proletariathttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E8lygVXgumY&feature=relatedhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_democracy#cite_note-SmithED-0%23cite_note-SmithED-0http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proletariat


13/14

Give me DTs or give me Death

Keeps the MOI busy

Truth kills truth saves Save yourself and the world

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3117338213439292490#

In this lecture by Michel Chossudovsky, he blows away the smokescreen put up by the mainstream media, that9/11 was an attack on America by "Islamic terrorists". Through meticulous research, he has uncovered a military-intelligence ploy behind the September 11 attacks, and the cover-up and complicity of key members of the Bush

Administration. According to Chossudovsky, the "war on terrorism" is a complete fabrication based on the illusionthat one man, Osama bin Laden, outwitted the $40 billion-a-year American intelligence apparatus. The "war onterrorism" is a war of conquest. Globalisation is the final march to the "New World Order", dominated by Wall

Street and the U.S. military-industrial complex. September 11, 2001 provides a justification for waging a warwithout borders. Washington's agenda consists in extending the frontiers of the American Empire to facilitatecomplete U.S. corporate control, while installing within America the institutions of the Homeland Security State.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bvay28lZiHU

Truth Kills

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8K9dgqKmJ50&feature

Fema Detention Camps Marshall Law

http://www.infowars.com/obama-implementing-martial-law-coup/

It's a gas when they say hey you can't do that ... I got rights dontcha know!!!!!!!

I'm tellin

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-aD8TU3VC-Q&feature=related

13
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3117338213439292490http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bvay28lZiHUhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8K9dgqKmJ50&featurehttp://www.infowars.com/obama-implementing-martial-law-coup/http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-aD8TU3VC-Q&feature=relatedhttp://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3117338213439292490http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bvay28lZiHUhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8K9dgqKmJ50&featurehttp://www.infowars.com/obama-implementing-martial-law-coup/http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-aD8TU3VC-Q&feature=related


14/14

A long video far surpassing the attention span of the MOI Majority of Ignorance

Terres Trials have begun accelerated in prevention of WW III

http://www.2012t-t.com

Pertinent knowledge must rapidly spread.

www.1or666.com will get you thereSimple truths radiation world wide will only annihilate the 666

Download the information before it and I are annihilated

The means to attack as simple as their own legislationwww.edictdefacto.com

In Canada the Constitution Humanity Spirit vs Attorney General Satanic Roman 13

On July 9 2012 Franky went to Court to set a date

Docket 13

Coincidence?

Will Franky get to court?

www.invincibletriad.org

14
http://www.2012t-t.com/http://www.2012t-t.com/http://www.1or666.com/http://www.edictdefacto.com/http://www.edictdefacto.com/http://www.invincibletriad.org/http://www.2012t-t.com/http://www.1or666.com/http://www.edictdefacto.com/http://www.invincibletriad.org/

Can People Be Humanly Sane and Not Unite as the Invincible Triad Against the Trilateral Commission

Documents

Transcript of Can People Be Humanly Sane and Not Unite as the Invincible Triad Against the Trilateral Commission