Campus Life Division Climate Survey Results and Plan of Action March 9, 2006.
-
Upload
domenic-gregory -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of Campus Life Division Climate Survey Results and Plan of Action March 9, 2006.
![Page 1: Campus Life Division Climate Survey Results and Plan of Action March 9, 2006.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082819/56649f2a5503460f94c43fbe/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Campus Life Division Climate Survey Results and Plan of Action
March 9, 2006
![Page 2: Campus Life Division Climate Survey Results and Plan of Action March 9, 2006.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082819/56649f2a5503460f94c43fbe/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Campus Life Response Rate A total of 317 surveys were distributed to Campus
Life employees.
A total of 154 employees responded (48%).
8 (5%)Military Vet20 (13%)LGBT
9 (6%)Part-time143 (93%)Full-time
139 (90%)Staff9 (6%)Faculty
37 (24%)Religious4 (3%)Physically Disabled
71 (46%)Minority 79 (51%)White
59 (38%)Male93 (60%)Female
![Page 3: Campus Life Division Climate Survey Results and Plan of Action March 9, 2006.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082819/56649f2a5503460f94c43fbe/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Overall Results
Category Percentage of Emory University
respondents who answered favorably
Percentage of Campus Life respondents who answered favorably
Campus Life overall mean/average
(out of a possible 5)
Value of Diversity 85% 82% 4.15
Organization Commitment
78% 76% 4.02
Selection/Hiring Practices
62% 62% 3.58
Coworker Interaction 68% 60% 3.57
Management Support 60% 60% 3.49
Development Opportunities
59% 57% 3.41
Work Group Practices 52% 49% 3.19
Reports show a mean average and percent positive for all categories.
![Page 4: Campus Life Division Climate Survey Results and Plan of Action March 9, 2006.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082819/56649f2a5503460f94c43fbe/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Employee Suggestions and Ideas
“Campus Life Class Awards recognized a diverse group of employees across all levels [from] support through management.”
“There is little or no use of rewards/recognition in our department. We desperately need it.”
“The head of my department seems to expect us to communicate with [him/her], but [he/she] often neglects to tell us information.”
“Staff development and training extremely limited.”
![Page 5: Campus Life Division Climate Survey Results and Plan of Action March 9, 2006.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082819/56649f2a5503460f94c43fbe/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Campus Life Action Plan
Retreat held for deans and directors in October, 2005
Task forces determined:
Communication
Leadership Development
Professional Development
Rewards and Recognition
Results shared with entire division in January, 2006
Task forces announced, call for volunteersTask forces in action this with recommendations due to Sr. Vice President by the end of the semester
![Page 6: Campus Life Division Climate Survey Results and Plan of Action March 9, 2006.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082819/56649f2a5503460f94c43fbe/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Lessons learned….so far
Communication is key. Appointment of Task Force chairs was
not inclusive. Some departments will be focus
groups The recommendations must fit the
specific needs of our division.