Cambodia Bridge Design Standard

download Cambodia Bridge Design Standard

of 26

Transcript of Cambodia Bridge Design Standard

  • 8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard

    1/67

  • 8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard

    2/67

    RBHraCaNacRkkm

  • 8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard

    3/67

    CAM PW 04-102-99 CAMBODIAN STANDARD

    AMENDMENTS TO BASE DOCUMENT BRIDGE DESIGN

    July 1999 MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORT  

    BLANK

  • 8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard

    4/67

    CAMBODIAN STANDARD CAM PW 04-102-99

    BRIDGE DESIGN AMENDMENTS TO BASE DOCUMENT

    MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORT July 1999 Page 1 of 39

    FOREWORD

    The Cambodia Bridge Design Standard is intended to be used forthe design of all new road and railway bridges in the Kingdom ofCambodia. The Cambodian Bridge Design Standard consists ofthe following complementary documents:

    - CAM PW 04-101-99 Australian Bridge Design Code 1996(the Base Document) and associated Commentary;

    - CAM PW 04-102-99 this document (the Amendments)

    which contains amendments and additions to the Basedocument; and

    - The Commentary on the Cambodian Bridge DesignStandard which contains amendments and additions to theCommentary on the Base Document.

    These documents shall be considered together. In the case of aconflict between the provisions of the Base Document and theprovisions of the Amendments, the Amendments shall overridethe Base Document.

    From time to time the Base Document may be changed by the

     Australian Authorities. Any such change shall be automaticallyincorporated into the Cambodian Bridge Design Standard unlessit conflicts with a provision of the Amendments.

    For the purpose of regulating and interpreting the provisions ofthis Standard, the AUTHORITY shall be the Cambodian Ministryof Public Works and Transport.

  • 8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard

    5/67

    CAM PW 04-102-99 CAMBODIAN STANDARD

    AMENDMENTS TO BASE DOCUMENT BRIDGE DESIGN

    Page 2 of 39 July 1999 MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORT  

    This document has beenproduced for the Kingdom of

    Cambodia as a joint Australia –Cambodia project sponsored bythe Australian Agency forInternational Development(AusAID).

    Valuable assistance andoperational advice wasprovided by the staff of theCambodian Ministry of PublicWorks and Transport (MPWT)

    Technical research andspecialist input was providedby the Australian consultingfirms of McMillan Britton & KellPty Limited and Willing &Partners Pty Ltd.

    Reproduction of extracts from this publication may be made subjectto due acknowledgment of the source.

     Although this publication is believed to be correct at the time ofprinting, neither the MPWT nor AusAID accept responsibility for anyconsequences arising from the use of the information contained in it.People using the information should apply, and rely upon, their ownskill and judgement to the particular issue which they areconsidering.

  • 8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard

    6/67

    CAMBODIAN STANDARD CAM PW 04-102-99

    BRIDGE DESIGN AMENDMENTS TO BASE DOCUMENT

    MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORT July 1999 Page 3 of 39

    TABLE OF CONTENTS

    PART A LIST OF AMENDED CLAUSES IN THE BASE DOCUMENT..... ........... ........... ..... ............ 5

    PART B TEXT OF AMENDED CLAUSES IN THE BASE DOCUMENT

    Section 1 General 7

    1.1 General Principles ..............................................................................................7

    1.1.1 Applicability ....................................................................................7

    1.3.1 Bridge Carriageway Widths.................... ........... . ....... ....... ....... ....... ...7

    1.3.2 Edge Clearances for Bridges Without Footways .......... ........... ........... .7

    1.3.4 Vertical Clearance at Structures............... ........... ...... ............. ........... 7

    1.10 Australian Standards .......... ........... .......... . ........... ........... .......... ....... ........ ....... ....8

    Section 2 Design Loads

    2.3 Traffic Loading.... ........... ........... ...... ........... ........... .......... ........... ........... .......... ....9

    2.3.3 L44 Lane Loading ............................................................................9

    2.3.4 Heavy Load Platform Loading............... ........... ...... ............ ........... ..... 9

    2.3.5 Number of Lanes for Design and Lateral Position of Loads.... .... .... ... .. 11

    2.3.5.2 Heavy load platform loading ........... ........... .......... ........... ........... ...... 112.3.8 Fatigue Loading............ ........... ......... .......... ........... ........... ....... ...... 11

    2.4.2 Dynamic Load Allowance -T44 Truck and L44 Lane loading ... ... ... ... ...11

    2.5.2 Braking forces............................................................................... 11

    2.5.4 Minimum Lateral Restraint Capacity - Ultimate Limit State ................ 12

    2.8 Wind Loads 13

    2.8.1 General.........................................................................................13

    2.8.2 Basic design wind speed........... ........... .......... .......... ........... ........... 13

    2.8.2.1 Derivation of site design gust wind speed (Vz)...................................13

    2.8.2.2 Terrain Category.......... ........... ........... .......... ........... ........... ............ 14

    2.8.2.3 Terrain and structure height multiplier (M (z,cat) )..................................15

    2.8.2.5 Topographic multiplier (Mt)..............................................................17

    2.8.3 Transverse wind load........... ........... .......... ........... .......... ........... ..... . 17

    2.8.3.1 Area of structure for calculation of transverse wind load, At ................ 18

    2.8.3.2 Calculation of drag coefficients, Cd...................................................18

    2.8.4 Longitudinal Wind Load.... ........... ........... ...... ........... ........... .......... .. 19

    2.8.5 Vertical Wind Load........................................................................ 20

    2.9 Thermal Effects................................................................................................ 20

    2.9.2 Variation in Average Bridge Temperature.......... ........... ........... ...... .... 20

    2.9.3 Differential Temperatures. ........... .......... ........... ....... ....... ....... ....... ...22

    2.13 Earthquake Forces...........................................................................................23

    2.13.1 General.........................................................................................23

    2.13.2 Earthquake Resistant Design.......... ........... .......... . ........ ....... ....... .... 23

    2.13.4 Equivalent Quasi-Static Earthquake Forces....... ........... ........... ... ..... . 23

    2.19 Road Signs and Lighting Structures .......... ........... ........... .......... ........... ........... ... 24

    2.19.3 Design Wind Speeds ..................................................................... 24

    2.19.3.2 Ultimate Limit State .......... ........... ........... .......... ........... ........... ..... ..24

    2.19.4 Design Wind Pressure ...................................................................24

    Section 3 Foundations...................................................................................................26

    Section 4 Bearings And Deck Joints ..............................................................................26

    Section 5 Concrete

    5.1 Scope and General ........... ........... .......... ........... ........... .......... ....... ....... ...... .......27

    5.1.1 Scope and Application ...................................................................27

    5.1.1.2 Application .................................................................................... 27

    5.1.5 Construction..................................................................................27

    5.2 Design Requirements and Procedures.... .......... ........... ....... .......... ........... ........... 27

  • 8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard

    7/67

    CAM PW 04-102-99 CAMBODIAN STANDARD

    AMENDMENTS TO BASE DOCUMENT BRIDGE DESIGN

    Page 4 of 39 July 1999 MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORT  

    5.2.4 Design for Serviceability. ........... ........... ......... .......... ........... .......... . . 27

    5.2.4.3 Cracking....................................................................................... 27

    5.4 Design for Durability......................................................................................... 28

    5.4.3 Exposure Classification ................................................................. 28

    5.4.10 Requirements for Cover to Reinforcing Steel and Tendons .... ... .... .... .. 29

    5.4.10.3 Cover for corrosion protection .......... ........... ........... ....... ........ ........ .. 29

    5.6 Design Properties of Materials................... ........... .. .......... ........... .......... . ...... ..... 295.6.1 Properties of Concrete ........... .......... ........... .......... ........... ........... ... 29

    5.6.1.1 Strength ....................................................................................... 29

    5.6.1.7 Shrinkage..................................................................................... 29

    5.6.1.8 Creep 29

    5.6.2 Properties of Reinforcement ........... ........... .......... ....... ....... ...... ....... 29

    5.6.2.1 Strength ....................................................................................... 29

    5.6.3 Properties of Tendons......... ........... ........... . .......... ........... ........... .... 30

    5.6.3.1 Strength ....................................................................................... 30

    5.6.3.2 Modulus of elasticity...................................................................... 30

    5.6.3.4 Relaxation of tendons ........... ........... .......... .......... ........... ........... .... 30

    5.13 Stress Development and Splicing of Reinforcement and Tendons... .... .... ... .... ... .... . 31

    5.13.1 Stress Development in Reinforcement ........... ........... .......... ....... ...... 31

    5.13.1.2 Development length for bar in tension. ........... ........... .......... ....... ...... 31

    5.14 Joints, Embedded Items, Fixings and Connections ........... ........... .......... ....... ...... 31

    5.14.2 Embedded Items and Holes in Concrete...... ........... ........... .... ...... .... 31

    5.14.2.2 Limitations of materials .......... ........... ........... .......... ........... ........... .. 31

    5.16 Material Requirements...... ........... ........... .... ........... ........... .......... ....... ....... ....... . 31

    5.16.1 Material Requirements for Concrete and Grout.. ........... ........... ........ . 31

    5.16.1.1 Materials for concrete and grout................ ........... ..... ....... ....... ....... . 31

    5.16.1.2 Normal-class concrete......... ........... .......... .. .......... ........... ........... ... 33

    5.16.2 Material for Reinforcing Steel... ........... ........... ....... ....... ....... ....... ..... 33

    5.16.2.1 Reinforcement...... ........... ........... .... .......... .......... ........... . ...... ...... ... 33

    5.16.3 Material Requirements for Prestressing Ducts, Anchorages and

    Tendons .............................................................................. 33

    5.16.3.4 Tendons. ...................................................................................... 33

     Appendix 5A Reference Documents .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... ..... ..... .. 34

    Section 6 Steel And Composite Construction

    6.2 Materials 35

    6.2.1 Yield Stress and Tensile Stress used in Design...... ....... ....... ........ ... 35

    6.2.4 Fasteners ..................................................................................... 38

    6.3.8 Design for Fire Resistance............................................................. 38

    Section 7 Rating .................................................................................................. . 39

    Railway Supplement To Sections 1-5

    1.1 General Principles............................................................................................ 39

    1.1.1 Applicability.................................................................................. 39

  • 8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard

    8/67

    CAMBODIAN STANDARD CAM PW 04-102-99

    BRIDGE DESIGN AMENDMENTS TO BASE DOCUMENT

    MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORT July 1999 Page 5 of 39

    PART A LIST OF AMENDED CLAUSES

    IN THE BASE DOCUMENT

    Sections 1 to 7:

    1.1.1....................... (General Principles) Applicability

    1.3.1......................... (Geometric Requirements) Bridge Carriageway Widths

    1.3.2......................... Edge Clearances for Bridges Without Footways

    1.3.4......................... Vertical Clearance at Structures

    1.10.......................... Australian Standards

    2.3.3......................... (Traffic Loading) L44 Lane Loading

    2.3.4......................... (Traffic Loading) Heavy Platform Loading

    2.3.5.2 ...................... (Position of Loads) Heavy load Platform loadings

    2.3.8......................... Fatigue Loading

    2.4.2......................... (Dynamic Load Allowance) T44 Truck and L44 Lane Loading

    2.5.2......................... (Horizontal Forces) Braking Forces2.5.4.........................Minimum Lateral restraint Capacity – Ultimate Limit State

    2.8 ............................Wind Loads (incl. All sub-clause s)

    2.9.2......................... (Thermal effects) Variation in Average Bridge temperature

    2.9.3......................... (Thermal effects) Differential temperatures

    2.13.1....................... (Earthquake Effects) General

    2.13.2.......................Earthquake Resistant Design

    2.13.4.......................Equivalent Quasi-static Earthquake Forces

    2.19.3....................... (Road Signs and lighting Structures) Design Wind Speeds

    2.19.4.......................Design Wind Pressure

    5.1.1.2 ...................... (Scope and Application) Application

    5.1.5......................... (Scope and Application) Construction

    5.2.4.3 ...................... (Design for Serviceability) Cracking

    5.4.3......................... (Design for Durability) Exposure Classification5.4.10.3.................... (Design for Durability) Cover for Corrosion Protection

    5.6.1.1 ...................... (Properties of Concrete) Strength

    5.6.1.7 ...................... (Properties of Concrete) Shrinkage

    5.6.1.8 ...................... (Properties of Concrete) Creep

    5.6.2.1 ...................... (Properties of Reinforcement) Strength

    5.6.3.1 ...................... (Properties of Tendons) Strength

    5.6.3.2 ...................... (Properties of Tendons) Modulus of Elasticity

    5.6.3.4 ...................... (Properties of Tendons) Relaxation of Tendons

    5.13.1.2.................... (Stress Development in Reinforcement) Development Length for Bar in

    Tension

    5.14.2.2.................... (Embedded Items and Holes in Concrete) Limitations of Materials

    5.16.1.1.................... Materials for Concrete and Grout

    5.16.1.2.................... (Material Requirements for Concrete and Grout) Normal-class Concrete

    5.16.2.1.................... (Material Requirements for Reinforcing Steel) Reinforcement

    5.16.3.4.................... (Material Requirements for Prestressing Ducts , Anchorages and Tendons)

    Tendons

    5A............................ Appendix 5A Reference Documents

    6.2.1......................... Yield Stress and Tensile Stress Used in Design

    6.3.8......................... Design for Fire Resistance

    Railway Supplement to Sections 1 - 5

  • 8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard

    9/67

    CAM PW 04-102-99 CAMBODIAN STANDARD

    AMENDMENTS TO BASE DOCUMENT BRIDGE DESIGN

    Page 6 of 39 July 1999 MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORT  

    1.1.1..........................(General Principles) Applicability

  • 8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard

    10/67

    CAMBODIAN STANDARD CAM PW 04-102-99

    BRIDGE DESIGN AMENDMENTS TO BASE DOCUMENT

    MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORT July 1999 Page 7 of 39

    PART B TEXT OF AMENDED CLAUSES

    IN THE BASE DOCUMENT

    SECTION 1 GENERAL

    1.1 General Principles

    1.1.1 Applicability

    Add the following paragraph between paragraphs 2 and 3:

    “The Cambodian Bridge Design Standard has been prepared for the design of road,

    rail and pedestrian bridges and other bridge- related structures under the jurisdiction ofthe Cambodia Ministry of Public Works and Transport, referred to in this document

    as the Authority, and also for use by other Authorities and organisations.”

    1.3.1 Bridge Carriageway Widths

    Page 1.4, Para 2, line 4: replace “600 mm” by “500 mm.” 

    1.3.2 Edge Clearances for Bridges Without Footways

    Replace existing Table 1.3.2 with the following Table:

    Table 1.3.2 Edge Clearances for B ri dges Without Footways. 

    TYPE OF ROAD DESIGN

    STANDARD

    EDGE CLEARANCE

    (EACH SIDE)

    Low volume, 2 lane roads,

    Projected ADT < 150 vehicles/day

    R1,

    U1

    No clearance minimum,

    250 mm preferred

    Medium volume, 2 lane roads,

    Projected ADT 150 to 3000 vehicles/day

    R2, R3

    U2, U3

    250 mm minimum,

    500 mm preferred

    High volume, 2 lane roads,

    Projected ADT >3000 vehicles/day

    R4, R5, R6

    U4, U5, U6

    500 mm minimum,

    1000 mm preferred

    Note:

    Traffic volumes are the expected Annual Average Daily Traffic volumes 30 years ahead.

    Design standards are defined in the Cambodian Road Design Standard Part 1 – Geometry. 

    1.3.4 Vertical Clearance at Structures

    In the last paragraph, replace “AS 1742.2” with “the appropriate Authority”.

  • 8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard

    11/67

    CAM PW 04-102-99 CAMBODIAN STANDARD

    AMENDMENTS TO BASE DOCUMENT BRIDGE DESIGN

    Page 8 of 39 July 1999 MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORT  

    1.10 Australian Standards

    Delete “Australian” from the first paragraph.

    Add the following paragraph:

    “References to Australian Standards may generally be replaced by references to an

    equivalent or similar standard from another country. Where specific provisions of

    Australian Standards are required, these standards are either adopted in their original

    form as a Cambodian Standard, or the relevant provisions are reproduced in the textof this Standard.”

  • 8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard

    12/67

    CAMBODIAN STANDARD CAM PW 04-102-99

    BRIDGE DESIGN AMENDMENTS TO BASE DOCUMENT

    MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORT July 1999 Page 9 of 39

    SECTION 2 DESIGN LOADS

    2.3 Traffic Loading

    2.3.3 L44 Lane Loading

    Replace the Article as follows:

    “The T44 Lane Loading shall consist of a uniformly distributed load as given in Figure

    2.3.3 together with a tandem of two concentrated loads 90 kN each spaced at 1.20

    m. The L44 Lane Loading shall be considered as uniformly distributed over the width

    of a 3 m Standard Design Lane.

    For continuous spans the L44 Lane Loading shall be continuous or discontinuous asmay be necessary to produce maximum effects, and the tandem of concentrated loads

    shall be placed in such a position as to produce maximum effects. Only one tandem ofconcentrated loads shall be used per lane except that one additional tandem of

    concentrated loads of equal force shall be placed in each lane in one other span in the

    series in such a position as to produce maximum negative moment. The L44 LaneLoading does not apply for spans less than 10 m.”

    2.3.4 Heavy Load Platform Loading

    Replace the whole of Article 2.3.4 with the following:

    “(a) The HLP 240 design loading shall be applied to bridges on the following road

    categories:

    - Expressways

    - Highways 

    - Provincial Roads 

    - Collector Roads 

    - Arterial Roads 

    These roads generally will comply with design standards R6/U6, R5/U5 and

    R4/U4 of the Cambodian Road Design Standard Part 1 – Geometry.

    (b) For a bridge on any other road category, the Authority shall determine if the

     bridge shall be designed for the effects of Heavy Load Platform loadings.

    (c) For bridges on special designated routes, as determined by the Authority, aheavy load configuration, which shall be specified by the Authority, shall beapplied.

    (d) The Heavy Load Platform (HLP) loadings shall have the following configurations:

    i. 12 rows of axles (HLP 240).

  • 8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard

    13/67

    CAM PW 04-102-99 CAMBODIAN STANDARD

    AMENDMENTS TO BASE DOCUMENT BRIDGE DESIGN

    Page 10 of 39 July 1999 MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORT  

    ii. The total load per axle shall be 200 kN. The axle load shall be equally

    distributed among all wheels.

    iii.Axles shall be spaced at 1.8 m centres.

    iv. 8 tyres per axle row.

    v. The overall width of axles shall be 3.6 m. The lateral spacing of dual wheels

    along an axle shall be as shown in Figure 2.3.4.

    vi. For continuous bridges, the loading may be separated into two groupsof 6 axles (HLP 240) with a central gap of between 6 m and 15 m,

    the gap being chosen to give the most adverse effect.

    vii. The tyre contact area for each individual wheel shall be assumed to be

    500 mm x 200 mm.”

    HLP 240

    12 axles @ 200 kN spaced at 1.80 m = total 2400 kN

    Overall length 19.80 m

    ELEVATION VIEW

    1400 mm 1400 mm

    3600 mm

    END VIEW OF AN HLP AXLE

    400500 500 500800400 500

     

    F igur e 2.3.4 Heavy Load Platform Loading

  • 8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard

    14/67

    CAMBODIAN STANDARD CAM PW 04-102-99

    BRIDGE DESIGN AMENDMENTS TO BASE DOCUMENT

    MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORT July 1999 Page 11 of 39

    2.3.5 Number of Lanes for Design and Lateral Position of

    Loads

    2.3.5.2 Heavy load platform loading

    Replace the first paragraph with the following:

    “The HLP 240 Heavy Load Platform loading shall be assumed to centrally occupy

    two Standard Design Lanes.”

    2.3.8 Fatigue Loading

    Replace Table 2.3.8 with the following:

    Table 2.3.8 Fatigue Stress Cycles for Tr aff ic L oadings

    Number of fatigue stress cycles for bridges on roads ofcategory:

    Fatigue design trafficloading

    Category R6/U6:

    Expressways, Highways,

    Arterial Roads

    All other roads

    W7 Wheel loading 2,000,000 500,000

    T44 Truck loading 500,000 100,000

    L44 Lane loading 100,000 100,000

    2.4.2 Dynamic Load Allowance -T44 Truck and L44 Lane

    loading

    The Dynamic Load Allowance for T44 and L44 loadings shall be 0.35, unless alternative

    values based on tests or on dynamic analysis are approved by the Authority.

    2.5.2 Braking forces.

    For the lengths of the structures between 10m and 60m, the braking force will be:

     

    300 kN + (L-10) m x 6 kN/m

     

    Replace existing Figure 2.5.2 with the Figure on the following page:

  • 8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard

    15/67

    CAM PW 04-102-99 CAMBODIAN STANDARD

    AMENDMENTS TO BASE DOCUMENT BRIDGE DESIGN

    Page 12 of 39 July 1999 MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORT  

    0

    100

    200

    300

    400

    500

    600

    700

    0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

    Length of structure considered(m)

       B  r  a   k   i  n  g

       f  o  r  c  e   (   k   N   )

     

    F igur e 2.5.2 Braking Forces

    2.5.4 Minimum Lateral Restraint Capacity - Ultimate Limit State

    Replace paragraph three with the following:

    “Restraints shall have sufficient lateral clearance to allow thermal movements,

    especially on wide and curved superstructures. The restraint system for each

    continuous section of superstructure shall be capable of resisting an ultimate design

    horizontal force normal to the bridge centreline of 200 kN or 5% of the superstructur e

    dead load at that support, whichever is greater.

    For all bridges over roads, vehicular accesses, railways and navigable waters, the

    restraint system shall be designed for an ultimate lateral load of 500 kN in accordance

    with the following criteria:

    1. Bridges over roads and vehicular accesses. Where the clearance between themaximum legal load and the underside of the structure is less than 3.5 m, the 500 kN

    load shall be applied to the superstructure within the width of the road formation.

    2. Navigable waters. Where the clearance between the top of the design vessel,

    excluding masts and aerials, to the underside of the bridge superstructure is less than3.5 m, the load shall be applied to the superstructure within the width of the navigable

    waters.

    3. Railways. Where the clearance from the railways clearance zone to the underside

    of the superstructure is less than 3.5 m, the load shall be applied to the superstructurewithin the width of the railway clearance zone plus 10 m either side of the railway

    clearance zone.”

  • 8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard

    16/67

    CAMBODIAN STANDARD CAM PW 04-102-99

    BRIDGE DESIGN AMENDMENTS TO BASE DOCUMENT

    MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORT July 1999 Page 13 of 39

    2.8 Wind Loads

    The whole of Article 2.8 shall be replaced with Clauses 2.8.1 to 2.8.5 as follows:

    2.8.1 General 

    Designing for wind loading is to be based on a static analysis, which is essentially a quasi-

    steady analysis approach using a design gust wind speed in conjunction with a mean loading

    coefficient. The gust wind speed is the maximum wind speed, averaged over a period of 2to 3 seconds which occurs in one hour. This approach is limited to conventional structures,

    (nominally having a first-mode frequency of vibration of less than 1 Hz). For wind sensitive

    structures such as suspension or long-span cable-stayed bridges, which may be subject to

    significant wind excited dynamic response, special investigations into the dynamic behaviour

    of the structure should be carried out.

    The methodology for determining the wind loading here is based on the 92' AUSTROADS

    Bridge Design Code and the Australian Standard for Wind Loading, AS 1170.2, to whichacknowledgments are made.

    2.8.2 Basic design wind speed

    The basic gust design wind speeds that shall be used are referenced to a standard exposure

    of 10m height above open country terrain, for Serviceability and Ultimate Limit State design

    conditions, defined by 20 and 2000 year Return Periods respectively. These are given for

    the three Cambodian Regions in Table 2.8.2.

    TABL E 2.8.2 Basic Gust Design Wind Speeds (m/sec)

    Region Description Serviceability

    Limit State

    Vs

    Ultimate

    Limit State

    Vu

    A Coastal Region within 50 km from the

    coast

    Coasta l Region for 50 to 100 km from the

    coast

    35

    35

    60

    50

    B Coastal Region beyond 100 km from the

    coast and Flat Land Region 35 45

    C High Land 35 45

    2.8.2.1 Derivation of site design gust wind speed (Vz)

    The design gust wind speed (Vz) at the site and for height, z , shall be calculated from theappropriate limit state basic wind speed given in Table 2.8.2 as follows:

  • 8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard

    17/67

    CAM PW 04-102-99 CAMBODIAN STANDARD

    AMENDMENTS TO BASE DOCUMENT BRIDGE DESIGN

    Page 14 of 39 July 1999 MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORT  

    Vz = V M(z,cat) Mt

    Where

    Vz  = The site design gust wind speed at height z, in metres per

    second

    V = The basic wind speed, (Vu) or (Vs) (see Table 2.8.2), in

    metres per second

    M(z,cat ) = A gust wind speed multiplier at height z for a terrain

    category with upwind distance of at least 2500 m (see

    Table 2.8.2.3)

    Mt = A topographic multiplier which shall be 1.0 if the

    approaching slopes are less than 0.05.

     Note: M  z,cat  may change from the tabulated values if the structure site is within

    the transition zone near the edge of a terrain boundary (see Clause

    2.8.2.4)

    Irrespective of the calculation in this Clause, the ultimate limit state site design gust wind

    speed (Vz), shall not be less than 30 m/sec.

    For serviceability limit state wind loads in conjunction with traffic loads on a structure, the

    selection of a wind speed for a specified return interval is not appropriate and the designwind speed shall be taken as 35 m/sec in all locations. The effect of wind on the traffic load

    need not be considered.

    2.8.2.2 Terrain Category

    Terrain, over which the approach wind flows towards a structure, shall be assessed on the basis of the following category descriptions:

    (a) Category 1 Exposed open terrain with few or no obstructions and water

    surfaces at serviceability wind speeds (Vs) only.

    (b) Category 2 Open terrain, grassland with few well scattered obstructions

    having heights generally from 1.5m to 10.0m and water

    surfaces for Vu.

    (c) Category 3 Terrain with numerous closely spaced obstructions having the

    size of domestic houses (3.0m to 5.0m high).

    (d) Category 4 Terrain with numerous large, high (10.0m to 30.0m high) and

    closely spaced obstructions such as large city centres and

    well-developed industrial complexes.

    Selection of terrain category shall be made with due regard to the permanence of the

    obstructions which constitute the surface roughness, in particular vegetation in tropical

    cyclonic regions shall not be relied upon to maintain a wooded terrain roughness.

  • 8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard

    18/67

    CAMBODIAN STANDARD CAM PW 04-102-99

    BRIDGE DESIGN AMENDMENTS TO BASE DOCUMENT

    MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORT July 1999 Page 15 of 39

    2.8.2.3 Terrain and structure height multiplier (M (z,cat) )

    The variation of terrain multipliers with height (z) shall be taken from Tables 2.8.2.3.(A) and

    2.8.2.3 (B). Designers shall take account of probable future changes to terrain roughness in

    assessment of terrain and structure height multipliers M (z,cat) 

    TABLE 2.8.2.3 (A) Terrain and Structure Height Mul tipli ers for Gust

    Wind Speeds in Ful ly Developed Terrains in Region A

    Height (z)  Multiplier M (z,cat) 

    M   Terrain Category 1&2  Terrain Category 3&4

    ≤  35

    10

    15

    20

    30

    40

    50

    75

    ≥ 100

    0.90

    0.95

    1.00

    1.07

    1.13

    1.20

    1.25

    1.29

    1.35

    1.40

    0.80

    0.80

    0.89

    0.95

    1.05

    1.15

    1.25

    1.29

    1.35

    1,40

    TABLE 2.8.2.3 (B) Terrain and Structure Height Mul tipli ers for Gust

    Wind Speeds in Ful ly Developed Terrains in Regions B & C

    Multiplier M (z,cat)Height (z)

    MTerrain

    Category 1

    Terrain

    Category 2

    Terrain

    Category 3

    Terrain

    Category 4

    ≤  35

    10

    15

    20

    30

    40

    0.99

    1.05

    1.12

    1.16

    1.19

    1.22

    1.24

    0.85

    0.91

    1.00

    1.05

    1.08

    1.12

    1.16

    0.75

    0.75

    0.83

    0.89

    0.94

    1.00

    1.04

    0.75

    0.75

    0.75

    0.75

    0.75

    0.80

    0.85

  • 8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard

    19/67

    CAM PW 04-102-99 CAMBODIAN STANDARD

    AMENDMENTS TO BASE DOCUMENT BRIDGE DESIGN

    Page 16 of 39 July 1999 MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORT  

    50

    75

    100

    150200 

    1.25

    1.27

    1.29

    1.311.32

    1.18

    1.22

    1.24

    1.271.29

    1.07

    1.12

    1.16

    1.211.24

    0.90

    0.98

    1.03

    1.111.16

    2.8.2.4 Changes in terrain category

    Where, for the direction under consideration, the wind approaches across ground

    with changes in terrain category within 2500 m of the structure, M (z,cat) shall betaken as the weighted average terrain and structure height multiplier over the

    2500m upwind of the structure at height z  above ground level.

    For evaluation at height z , a change in terrain incorporates a lag distance ( x i)25.1

    ,

    ,3.0  

    =

    r o

    r oi z 

     z  z  x  

     z o,r  = larger of the two roughness lengths at a boundary between roughnesses (given in

    Table 2.8.2.4)

     z  = height of the structure for which the design velocity is required.

    Note: For height less than 10m the lag distance should be taken as 1.0.

    TABLE 2.8.2.4 Roughness Lengths for Terrain Categor ies

    Terrain category Roughness length (m)

    Terrain category 1 0.002

    Terrain category 2 0.02

    Terrain category 3 0.2

    Terrain category 4 2

    The weighted average of Mz,cat is weighted by the length of each terrain upwind

    of the structure allowing for the lag distance at each terrain category change for a

    distance of 2500 m, as shown in Figure 2.8.2.4.

  • 8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard

    20/67

    CAMBODIAN STANDARD CAM PW 04-102-99

    BRIDGE DESIGN AMENDMENTS TO BASE DOCUMENT

    MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORT July 1999 Page 17 of 39

    2500

    33,44,22,

    ,

    t  z t  z t  z 

    cat  z 

     x M  x M  x M  M 

    ++=   for the case illustrated 

    F igure 2.8.2.4 Changes in Terrain Category

    2.8.2.5 Topographic multiplier (Mt)

    For bridge sites approach slopes are usually less than 0.05, and for which Mt = 1.0.

    However, if approach slopes are greater than 0.05 the Topographic Multiplier from Table3.2.8 in AS 1170.2-1989 shall be used.

    2.8.3 Transverse wind loadThe transverse wind load shall be taken as acting horizontally at the centroids of theappropriate areas, and shall be calculated as follows:

    (a) Serviceability design transverse wind load Wt s*

    Wt s* = 0.0006 Vs2 At  Cd (kN)

    (b) Ultimate design transverse wind load Wtu*

    Wtu* = 0.0006 Vu At  Cd (kN)

    where:

    Vs  = design wind speed for Serviceability Limit States (m/sec)

    Vu  = design wind speed for Ultimate Limit States (m/sec)

    At = area of the structure for calculation of wind load (m2)

    Cd  = drag coefficient.

    2500 m

    lag distance 

     x i tc3 / tc4

    Terrain cat 3 Terrain cat 4 Terrain cat 2

    lag distance 

     xi tc4 / tc2

     xt3  x t4  x t2 

     z z

    Wind direction

  • 8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard

    21/67

    CAM PW 04-102-99 CAMBODIAN STANDARD

    AMENDMENTS TO BASE DOCUMENT BRIDGE DESIGN

    Page 18 of 39 July 1999 MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORT  

    2.8.3.1 Area of structure for calculation of transverse wind load, At

    The area of the structure or element under consideration shall be the solid area in normal

     projected elevation subject to the following provisions:

    (a) Superstructures with solid parapets

    The area of the superstructure shall include the area of the solid windward parapet,

     but the effect of the leeward parapet need not be considered.

    (b) Superstructures with open parapets

    The total load shall be the sum of the loads for the superstructure, the windward

     barrier and the leeward barrier considered separately. Where there are more than

    two parapets or safety fences, irrespective of the width of the superstructure, only

    those two elements having the greatest unshielded effect shall be considered.

    (c) Piers

    Shielding shall not be considered.

    2.8.3.2 Calculation of drag coefficients, Cd 

    (a) Drag coefficient for all superstructures with solid elevation

    For superstructures with or without traffic load, C d  shall be derived from

    Figure 2.8.3.2 where

     b = depth of bridge between outer faces of parapets

    d = depth of superstructure (including solid parapet if applicable).

    (b) Drag coefficient for truss girder superstructures

    The wind force on truss girder superstructures shall be calculated by considering each

    component individually, using the drag coefficients C d from Appendix B in AS 1170.2.

    (c) Drag coefficients for beams during erection

    The drag coefficient for beams and girders during erection stages shall be calculatedfor individual beams using Figure 2.8.3.2. Shielding shall not be considered for

    individual beams, but may be allowed for when two or more beams are connected, provided the ratio of the clear distance between beams to the depth does not exceed

    7. Under such circumstances, the drag coefficient for the combination may be taken

    as 1.5 times the value for an individual beam.

  • 8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard

    22/67

    CAMBODIAN STANDARD CAM PW 04-102-99

    BRIDGE DESIGN AMENDMENTS TO BASE DOCUMENT

    MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORT July 1999 Page 19 of 39

    (d) Drag coefficient for parapet railings, parapet barriers and substructures.

    Drag coefficients shall be obtained from Appendix B in AS 1170.2.

    F igur e 2.8.3.2 Drag Coeff icient C d  for Superstructur es with Soli d

    Elevation

    NOTES

    1. The values given assume a vertical elevation and a horizontal wind

    2. Where the windward face is inclined to the vertical, the drag coefficient Cd may be reduced by

    0.5% per degree of inclination from the vertical, subject to a maximum reduction of 30%.

    3. Where the windward face consists of a vertical and a sloping part or two sloping parts inclined

    at different angles, the wind load shall be derived as follows:

    (a) The basic drag coefficient Cd is calculated using the total depth of the structure.

    (b) For each non-vertical face, the basic drag coefficient calculated above is reduced in

    accordance with Note 2.

    (c) The total wind load is calculated by applying the appropriate drag coefficients to the

    relevant areas.

    4. Where a superstructure is superelevated, Cd shall be increased by 3% per degree of inclination

    to the horizontal, but not by more than 25%.

    5. Where a superstructure is subject to wind inclined at not more than 5 degrees to the horizontal,

    Cd  shall be increased by 15%. Where the angle of inclination exceeds 5 degrees, the drag

    coefficient shall be derived from tests.

    6. Where a superstructure is superelevated and also subject to inclined wind, the drag coefficient

    shall be the subject of special investigation.

    2.8.4 Longitudinal Wind Load

    For piers, truss bridges and other superstructure forms which present a significant surface

    area to wind loads parallel to the longitudinal centreline of the structure, a longitudinal wind

  • 8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard

    23/67

    CAM PW 04-102-99 CAMBODIAN STANDARD

    AMENDMENTS TO BASE DOCUMENT BRIDGE DESIGN

    Page 20 of 39 July 1999 MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORT  

    load shall be considered. The serviceability and ultimate design longitudinal wind loads shall

     be calculated in a manner similar to those for transverse wind loads.

    Longitudinal wind loads on the superstructure may also be significant during the construction

    stage of some bridge types which are not affected by these loads at normal service levels.

    2.8.5 Vertical Wind Load

    An upward or downward vertical wind load, acting at the centroid of the appropriate area,

    shall be calculated as follows:

    (a) Serviceability design vertical wind load W vs* (kN)

    Wvs*  = 0.00045 Vs

    2 A p 

    (b) Ultimate design vertical wind load W vu* (kN)

    Wvu*  = 0.00045 Vu

    2 A p 

    whereVx  = design wind speed for Serviceability Limit States (m/sec)

    Vu  = design wind speed for Ultimate Limit States (m/sec)

    A p  = bridge area in plan (m2).

    The above relationships may be used provided the angle of inclination of the wind to the

    structure is less than 5 degrees. For inclinations in excess of 5 degrees, the lift coefficientshall be investigated by testing.

    2.9 Thermal Effects

    2.9.2 Variation in Average Bridge Temperature

    Second paragraph, delete the following sentence:

    “eg frost pockets and sheltered low-lying areas where the minimum shade air

    temperature may be substantially lower”

    Replace the Table 2.9.2 (a) with the following:

  • 8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard

    24/67

    CAMBODIAN STANDARD CAM PW 04-102-99

    BRIDGE DESIGN AMENDMENTS TO BASE DOCUMENT

    MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORT July 1999 Page 21 of 39

    Table 2.9.2 (a) Shade Ai r Temperatures  

    SHADE AIR TEMPERATURES ( 0 C)

    CLIMATIC REGION (1)  Maximum Minimum

    Coastal (2) 

    Flat Land and High Land (3) 

    40

    42

    11

    8

    Notes: 1) For the extent of climatic regions refer to Figure 2.9.2

    2) For locations less than 20 km from the sea coast the maximum temperature

    may be reduced by 2 0 C and the minimum temperature increased by 3 0 C

    3) For locations with altitude greater than 1000 m above the sea level the

    maximum temperature shall be reduced by 10 0  C and the minimum

    temperature shall be reduced by 5 0 C.

  • 8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard

    25/67

    CAM PW 04-102-99 CAMBODIAN STANDARD

    AMENDMENTS TO BASE DOCUMENT BRIDGE DESIGN

    Page 22 of 39 July 1999 MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORT  

    Add the following Figure 2.9.2:

    F igur e 2.9.2 Climatic Regions in Cambodia

    2.9.3 Differential Temperatures.

    In Figure 2.9.3, replace the “Regional Values for T” and associated information with the

    following:

    LOCATION OF THE BRIDGE T

    1. All locations less than 500 m above sea level

    2. All locations more than 500 m above sea level

    13 0C

    18 0C

  • 8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard

    26/67

    CAMBODIAN STANDARD CAM PW 04-102-99

    BRIDGE DESIGN AMENDMENTS TO BASE DOCUMENT

    MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORT July 1999 Page 23 of 39

    2.13 Earthquake Forces

    2.13.1 General

    Replace the whole of the Clause with the following:

    “There are no records of seismographs inside Cambodia in the World Earthquake

    database. Information gathered in neighbouring countries indicates there are no

    recorded epicentres in Cambodia.

    A uniform acceleration coefficient of a = 0.05 is considered to be appropriate

    throughout Cambodia.”

    2.13.2 Earthquake Resistant Design

    Insert between the second and the third paragraph:

    “As a minimum requirement for conditions prevailing in Cambodia, the ends of deck at

    abutments and at piers of simply supported structures shall allow for a minimum 200

    mm of horizontal displacement additional to displacements calculated for otherloadings, without falling off the edge of the support.”

    2.13.4 Equivalent Quasi-Static Earthquake Forces

    (a) Seismicity factor, α 

    Delete Table 2.13.4.1 and replace the text with the following: 

    “The value of Seismicity Factor shall be determined by the application of the following

    relationship to the acceleration coefficient, a: 

    For a # 0.08 α = 0.13”

    (e) Site-structure resonance factor, S

    Replace the text with the following:

    “The Site-Structure Resonance Factor shall be either taken as 1.5 or determined from

    Table 2.13.4 (e):

  • 8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard

    27/67

    CAM PW 04-102-99 CAMBODIAN STANDARD

    AMENDMENTS TO BASE DOCUMENT BRIDGE DESIGN

    Page 24 of 39 July 1999 MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORT  

    Tabl e 2.13.4.(e) Site-Structu re Resonance Factors

    SOIL PROFILE SITE-STRUCTURE

    RESONANCE

    FACTOR S

     A profile of rock materials with rock strength low or better 0.67

     A soil profile with either;

    (a) Rock material with extreme low or very low strength

    characterised by shear wave velocities greater than 760 m/sec, or

    (b) not more than 30 m of :medium dense to very dense coarse

    sands and gravels;

    firm, stiff or hard clays; or

    controlled fill

    1.0

     A soil profile with more than 30 m of :

    Medium dense to very dense coarse sand and gravels :

    Firm, stiff or hard clays; or

    Controlled fill

    1.25

     A soil profile with a total depth of 20 m or more and containing 6 to 12 m

    of:

    Very soft to soft clays;

    Very loose or loose sands;

    Silts; or

    Uncontrolled fill

    1.5

     A soil profile with more than 12 m of;

    Very soft to soft clays:

    Very loose or loose sands;

    Silts; or

    Uncontrolled fill characterised by shear wave velocities less

    than 150 m/sec

    2.0

    2.19 Road Signs and Lighting Structures

    2.19.3 Design Wind Speeds

    2.19.3.2 Ultimate Limit State

    Replace the first line with the following:

    “The basic design gust wind speed shall be:”  

    Replace “200 year return interval wind speed *” with “ 0.85 Vu* ”

    Replace “* Determine from AS 1170.2” with “ The design wind speed, Vu, shall be

    determined from Clause 2.8.2.1 which includes the application of height and topographical

    multipliers.”

    2.19.4 Design Wind Pressure

    The design wind pressure q* (kPa), for Serviceability or Ultimate Limit States, may be

    calculated using the following equivalent dynamic pressure approach:

  • 8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard

    28/67

    CAMBODIAN STANDARD CAM PW 04-102-99

    BRIDGE DESIGN AMENDMENTS TO BASE DOCUMENT

    MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORT July 1999 Page 25 of 39

    32* 1061.0   −= V C Q d   where

    V = the basic wind speed (VU) or (VS) (see Table 2.8.2), in metres per second.

    Cd  = drag coefficient, determined from AS1170.2 or Table 2.19.4, as appropriate.

     Note: For tall slender structures, such as high masts, the equivalent dynamic pressure

    approach may be unconservative. As an alternative the gust-energy or gust-factor method of determining design wind loads may be employed.

  • 8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard

    29/67

    CAM PW 04-102-99 CAMBODIAN STANDARD

    AMENDMENTS TO BASE DOCUMENT BRIDGE DESIGN

    Page 26 of 39 July 1999 MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORT  

    SECTION 3 FOUNDATIONS

    The AUSTROADS Code includes provisions for the determination of ultimate pile

    resistance design of pile footings by a choice of methods, including static analysis, dynamic

    analysis or static load testing, and provides the appropriate material factors fordetermination of the design resistances.

    In view of the broad range of acceptable methods, which also include the current practice

    in Cambodia, it is not considered necessary to modify this Section.

    The following Australian Standards referred to in the text have been replaced:

    AS 2042 replaced by AS 2041

    AS1342 replaced by AS 4058

    SECTION 4 BEARINGS AND DECK JOINTS

    There are no amendments to Section 4 except that AS 1511, referred to in Clause 4.14.3,has been replaced by AS 4100.

    Refer to Section 4 Commentary for revised Articles C4.3 and C4.17 

  • 8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard

    30/67

    CAMBODIAN STANDARD CAM PW 04-102-99

    BRIDGE DESIGN AMENDMENTS TO BASE DOCUMENT

    MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORT July 1999 Page 27 of 39

    SECTION 5 CONCRETE

    5.1 Scope and General

    5.1.1 Scope and Application

    5.1.1.2 Application 

    Add after (a):

    “Compressive strength of concrete is defined in this Code on the basis of tests carried

    out on standard test cylinders 150 mm diameter by 300 mm long. Where concrete

    strength is to be determined on the basis of tests carried out on samples of other

    dimensions, this fact shall be clearly stated on the drawings and in the specification.

    Where standard 150 mm x 150 mm x 150 mm concrete cubes are used for testing,the equivalent standard cylinder strength may be obtained from:

    ''

    10'

    15log2.076.0 cube

    cubec  f 

     f  f 

       

      

     +=  

    5.1.5 Construction 

    Add the following paragraph at the end of the Article:

    “The tolerances for position and size of the structure and members are reproduced in

    Clause C5.15. More stringent tolerances may be required for reasons ofserviceability, fit of components, or aesthetics of the structure. These will be specified

    in the Construction Specifications issued by relevant Authorities.”

    5.2 Design Requirements and Procedures

    5.2.4 Design for Serviceability

    5.2.4.3 Cracking 

    Refer to the Commentary for examples of additional requirements stipulated by some RoadAuthorities in Australia to supplement the requirements related to cracking.

  • 8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard

    31/67

    CAM PW 04-102-99 CAMBODIAN STANDARD

    AMENDMENTS TO BASE DOCUMENT BRIDGE DESIGN

    Page 28 of 39 July 1999 MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORT  

    5.4 Design for Durability.

    5.4.3 Exposure Classification

    Replace the existing Table 5.4.3 with the new Table 5.4.3.

    Table 5.4.3 Exposure Classif ications  

    SURFACE AND EXPOSURE ENVIRONMENT EXPOSURE

    CLASSIFICATION

    1 SURFACES OF MEMBERS IN CONTACT WITH THE GROUND (Note

    1)

    (a) Members in non-aggressive soil (Note 2)

    (b) Members protected by a damp-proof membrane

    (c) Members in aggressive soils (Note 3)

    B1

     A

    U

    2 SURFACES OF MEMBERS IN INTERIOR ENVIRONMENT

    Fully enclosed within a structure except for a brief period of

    weather exposure during construction. A

    3 SURFACES OF MEMBERS IN ABOVE-GROUND EXTERIOR

    ENVIRONMENTS IN AREAS THAT ARE:

    (a) Inland & near-coastal (> 1 km from coastline).

    (b) Coastal (Up to 1 km from coast -line but excluding tidal and

    splash zones) (Note 4).

    B1

    B2

    4 SURFACES OF MEMBERS IN WATER (Note 1)

    (a) In fresh water

    (b) In sea water or ground water containing salt:

    (i) permanently submerged

    (ii) In tidal or splash zone

    (c) In soft or running water

    B1

    B2

    C

    U

    5 SURFACES OF MEMBERS IN OTHER ENVIRONMENTS

     Any exposure environment not described in Items 1 to 4 above UNote s: 1) Members, such as piles without permanent steel casing, shall be classified as members

    in water unless it is proved by geotechnical investigation that no part of the member is

    below the permanent water table level.

    2) If testing has been undertaken to ascertain that the soil in contact with concrete is non-

    aggressive, then exposure classification A may be used, provided that the soil is not

    subject to wetting and drying. Typically, members in the top 500 mm of soil would not

    qualify for this reduction.

    3) Permeable soils with pH < 4.0 or with ground level containing more than one gram per litre

    of sulphate ions, would be considered aggressive.

    4) For the purpose of this Table, the coastal zone includes locations within 1 km of the

    shoreline of the large expanses of salt water, eg river deltas affected by tides. Where thereare strong prevailing winds or vigorous surf, the distance should be incr eased beyond 1

    km and higher levels of protection should be considered. Proximity to small salt water

    bays, estuaries and rivers may be disregarded, except for structures immediately over or

    adjacent to such bodies of water. 

  • 8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard

    32/67

    CAMBODIAN STANDARD CAM PW 04-102-99

    BRIDGE DESIGN AMENDMENTS TO BASE DOCUMENT

    MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORT July 1999 Page 29 of 39

    5.4.10 Requirements for Cover to Reinforcing Steel and

    Tendons

    5.4.10.3 Cover for corrosion protection 

    Add at the end of Clause 5.4.10.3 (b):

    “In cases where the standard of formwork is likely to be lesser than specified by

    AS 3610 - Formwork for Concrete, the values in Table 5.4.10.3 (A) shall be suitably

    increased.”

    5.6 Design Properties of Materials

    5.6.1 Properties of Concrete

    5.6.1.1 Strength

    Add at the end of this Clause:

    “For the definition of the compressive strength of concrete refer to Clause 5.1.1.2.”  

    5.6.1.7 Shrinkage  

    For the applicability of the curves for the shrinkage coefficient k 1 appropriate for the relative

    humidities applicable in Cambodia refer to clause C5.6.1.7.

    5.6.1.8 Creep

    For the applicability of the curves for the creep factor coefficient k 2 appropriate for the

    relative humidities applicable in Cambodia refer to clause C5.6.1.8.

    5.6.2 Properties of Reinforcement

    5.6.2.1 Strength

    Add the following paragraph after the existing first paragraph:

    “Reinforcing bars, steel hard drawn wires and welded wire fabric to the ASTM

    Standards may be also used follows:

    Type Australian Standard ASTM Standard

    Deformed bars AS 1302 A 615 Grade 60*

    Steel wire AS 1303 A 185

    Welded wire fabric AS 1304 A 82

    * Bars to A 615 are not weldable.”

  • 8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard

    33/67

  • 8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard

    34/67

    CAMBODIAN STANDARD CAM PW 04-102-99

    BRIDGE DESIGN AMENDMENTS TO BASE DOCUMENT

    MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORT July 1999 Page 31 of 39

    5.13 Stress Development and Splicing of Reinforcement

    and Tendons

    5.13.1 Stress Development in Reinforcement 

    5.13.1.2 Development length for bar in tension.

    (b) Deemed-to-comply development length

    Add the following:

    “(vi) f sy does not exceed 400 MPa.”

    5.14 Joints, Embedded Items, Fixings and Connections

    5.14.2 Embedded Items and Holes in Concrete

    5.14.2.2 Limitations of materia ls

    In Article (a) replace “AS 3600” by “the Authority”.

    5.16 Material Requirements

    5.16.1 Material Requirements for Concrete and Grout

    5.16.1.1 Materials for concrete and grout

    (a) Portland Cement  

    Add the following at the end of the sub-clause:

     “Cement complying with ASTM C150 Standard Specification for Portland Cement

    Type I would also be acceptable.”

    (b) Blended cements.

    Add the following at the end of the sub-clause: 

    “ASTM C595M Standard Specification for Blended Hydraulic Cements (Metric) is

    the nearest equivalent ASTM specification that covers blended cements. It contains

    more types than the Australian Standard.”

    (c) Fly ash.

    Replace “AS 3583.1” with “AS 3582.1”.

  • 8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard

    35/67

    CAM PW 04-102-99 CAMBODIAN STANDARD

    AMENDMENTS TO BASE DOCUMENT BRIDGE DESIGN

    Page 32 of 39 July 1999 MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORT  

    Add the following at the end of the sub-clause:

    “The ASTM C618 Standard Specification for coal Fly Ash and Raw or Calcined

     Natural Pozzolan for Use as a Mineral Admixture in Concrete is the nearest

    equivalent.”

    (d) Slag.

    Replace “AS 3972” with “AS 3582.1”.

    Add the following at the end of the sub-clause:

    “The ASTM C989 Standard Specification for Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag

    for Use in Concrete and Mortars is the nearest ASTM equivalent.”

    Add new sub-clause after (d) as follows:

    “(e) Silica fume 

    Silica fume shall comply with AS 3582.3

    The ASTM C 1240 Standard specification for Silica Fume for Use as a Mineral

    Admixture in Hydraulic Cement, Concrete, Mortar and Grout is the nearest

    equivalent.”

    Renumber existing sub-clause (e) as follows:

    “(f) Aggregates”

    and add the following to the end of the renumbered sub-clause:

    “ASTM C33 Standard Specification for Concrete Aggregates is the nearest

    equivalent ASTM standard.”

    Renumber existing sub-clause (f) as follows:

    “(g) Water ”

    Renumber existing sub-clause (g) as follows:

    “(h) Chemical admixtures”

    and add the following to the end of the renumbered sub-clause:

     

    “ASTM C494 Standard Specification for Chemical Admixtures in Concrete is thenearest equivalent standard. Other relevant ASTM Standards are ASTM C260

  • 8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard

    36/67

    CAMBODIAN STANDARD CAM PW 04-102-99

    BRIDGE DESIGN AMENDMENTS TO BASE DOCUMENT

    MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORT July 1999 Page 33 of 39

    Standard Specification for Air-entraining Admixtures of Concrete and ASTM C1017

    Standard Specification for Chemical Admixtures for Use in Producing Flowing

    Concrete.

    Cellulose-type chemical water thickeners may be used in grout (See SAA MP 20

    Part 3).”

    Renumber existing sub-clause (h) as follows:

    “(i) Other materials”

    5.16.1.2 Normal-class concrete

    Replace Article 5.16.1.2 (d)(i) with the following:

    “Cement shall comply with AS 3972 alone or in combination with one or more

    cementitious materials.”

    5.16.2 Material for Reinforcing Steel

    5.16.2.1 Reinforcement

    At the end of the Article, add the following:

    “Alternative ASTM Standards are listed in Article 5.6.2.1.”

    5.16.3 Material Requirements for Prestressing Ducts,

    Anchorages and Tendons 

    5.16.3.4 Tendons.

    At the end of the first paragraph add the following:

    “The nearest equivalent ASTM standards are:

    ASTM 416-96 Standard Specification for Steel Strand, Uncoated Seven-Wire

    for Prestressed ConcreteASTM A722-97 Standard Specification for Uncoated High-Strength Steel Bar for

    Prestressing Concrete.

    ASTM A882/A882M-96 Standard Specification for Epoxy-Coated Seven-WirePrestressing Steel Strand.

    ASTM A886/A886M-96 Standard specification for Steel Strand, Indented, Seven-Wire Stress-Relieved for Prestressed Concrete.”

  • 8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard

    37/67

    CAM PW 04-102-99 CAMBODIAN STANDARD

    AMENDMENTS TO BASE DOCUMENT BRIDGE DESIGN

    Page 34 of 39 July 1999 MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORT  

    Appendix 5A Reference Documents

    Add the following references:

    “AS 3582.1 Supplementary Cementitious Materials for use with Portland and

    Blended Cement - Fly Ash AS 3582.2 Supplementary Cementitious Materials for use with Portland and

    Blended Cement - Ground Granulated Iron Blast Furnace Slag

     AS 3582.3 Supplementary Cementitious Materials for use with Portland and

    Blended Cement - Silica Fume

     ASTM A615 Standard Specification for Deformed and Plain Billet Steel Bars for

    Concrete Reinforcement

     ASTM A185 Standard Specification for Steel Welded Wire Fabric, Plain, for

    Concrete Reinforcement

     ASTM A82 Standard Specification for Steel Wire, Plain, for Concrete

    Reinforcement

     ASTM 416-96 Standard Specification for Steel Strand, Uncoated Seven-Wire for

    Prestressed Concrete

     ASTM A722-97 Standard Specification for Uncoated High-Strength Steel Bar for

    Prestressing Concrete.

     ASTM A882/A882M-96 Standard Specification for Epoxy-Coated Seven-Wire

    Prestressing Steel Strand.

     ASTM A886/A886M-96 Standard specification for Steel Strand, Indented, Seven-Wire

    Stress-Relieved for Prestressed Concrete.

     ASTM C150 Standard Specification for Portland Cement Type I would also be

    acceptable.

     ASTM C595M Standard Specification for Blended Hydraulic Cements (Metric)

     ASTM C618 Standard Specification for coal Fly Ash and Raw or Calcined Natural

    Pozzolan for Use as a Mineral Admixture in Concrete

     ASTM C989 Standard Specification for Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag

    for Use in Concrete and Mortars

     ASTM C1240 Standard specification for Silica Fume for Use as a Mineral Admixture in

    Hydraulic Cement, Concrete, Mortar and Grout ASTM C33 Standard Specification for Concrete Aggregates

     ASTM C494 Standard Specification for Chemical Admixtures in Concrete

     ASTM C260 Standard Specification for Air-entraining Admixtures of Concrete

     ASTM C1017 Standard Specification for Chemical Admixtures for Use in Producing

    Flowing Concrete.” 

    The following Australian Standards referred to in Section 5 have been withdrawn:

     AS1312

     AS 1314

  • 8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard

    38/67

    CAMBODIAN STANDARD CAM PW 04-102-99

    BRIDGE DESIGN AMENDMENTS TO BASE DOCUMENT

    MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORT July 1999 Page 35 of 39

    SECTION 6 STEEL AND COMPOSITE

    CONSTRUCTION

    6.2 Materials

    6.2.1 Yield Stress and Tensile Stress used in Design.

    Add the following new Article after 6.2.1.1:

    “6.2.1.3 Equivalent ASTM Standards

    The revised Table 6.2.1 includes nearest, but not exact, equivalent ASTM Standards

    and Grades. An exact equivalent is not possible to specify as there is sometimes none

    available or because part of the standard complies, but other part may not (eg the

    range of thicknesses).

    In critical cases both standards (AS and ASTM) should be compared and the

    designer should establish the full compatibility of the ASTM Standard for the intended

    use.

    Table 6.2.1 Strength of Steels Complying wi th AS 1163, AS 1594, AS

    3678 and AS 3679.

    Steel

    Standard

    Form Steel Grade Thickness

    of material

    (t), (mm)

     Yield

    Stress

    (MPa)

    Tensile

    Strength

    (MPa)

    ASTM

    No.

    ASTM

    Grade

    C450 All 450 500

    C450 L0 All 450 500

    C350

    C350L0

     All 350 430

     AS 1163 Hollow Sections

    C250

    C250L0

     All 250 320

    Plate & Strip XF500 All 480

    (see

    Note)

    570 A715 Gr 70

    Plate, Strip &

    Floorplate

    Hd400 All 400  460   A572  Gr 60 

    t ≤ 3.5   380  460   A715  Gr 60 Plate & Strip  XF400 

    t > 3.5 360 440 A715 Gr 60

    Plate, Strip &Floorplate

    Hd350 All 350 430 A572 Gr 50

    Plate & Strip HW350 All 340 450 A606

    Hd300/1 All 300 430 A414 Gr BPlate, Strip &

    FloorplateHd300 All 300 400 A572 Gr 42

    Plate & Strip  XF300   All  300  440   A715  Gr 50

    Hd250 All 250 350 A36

     AS 1594

    Plate, Strip &

    FloorplateHd200 All 200 300 A570 Gr 30

  • 8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard

    39/67

    CAM PW 04-102-99 CAMBODIAN STANDARD

    AMENDMENTS TO BASE DOCUMENT BRIDGE DESIGN

    Page 36 of 39 July 1999 MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORT  

    Table 6.2.1 (Continued)

    Steel

    Standard

    Form Steel Grade Thickness

    of material

    (t), (mm)

     Yield

    Stress

    (MPa)

    Tensile

    Strength

    (MPa)

    ASTM

    No.

    ASTM

    Grade

    400

    400L15

    t ≤  12 400 480 A572 Gr 60

    400

    400L15

    12

  • 8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard

    40/67

    CAMBODIAN STANDARD CAM PW 04-102-99

    BRIDGE DESIGN AMENDMENTS TO BASE DOCUMENT

    MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORT July 1999 Page 37 of 39

    Steel

    Standard

    Form Steel Grade Thickness

    of material

    (t), (mm)

     Yield

    Stress

    (MPa)

    Tensile

    Strength

    (MPa)

    ASTM

    No.

    ASTM

    Grade

    250

    250L0

    250L15

    t ≤ 12 260 410 A 36

    250250L0

    250L15

    12 < t < 40 250 410 A 36

  • 8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard

    41/67

    CAM PW 04-102-99 CAMBODIAN STANDARD

    AMENDMENTS TO BASE DOCUMENT BRIDGE DESIGN

    Page 38 of 39 July 1999 MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORT  

    Table 6.2.1 (Continued)

    Steel

    Standard

    Form Steel Grade Thickness

    of material

    (t), (mm)

     Yield

    Stress

    (MPa)

    Tensile

    Strength

    (MPa)

    ASTM

    No.

    ASTM

    Grade

     AS 3679 Sections & Flat

    bars (cont.)

    250

    250L0250L15

    t ≥  40 230 410 A 36

    350

    350L0

    350L15

    t ≤  50 340 480 A 572 Gr 50

    350

    350LO

    350L15

    50

  • 8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard

    42/67

    CAMBODIAN STANDARD CAM PW 04-102-99

    BRIDGE DESIGN AMENDMENTS TO BASE DOCUMENT

    MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORT July 1999 Page 39 of 39

    SECTION 7 RATING

    There are no amendments to Section 7.

    RAILWAY SUPPLEMENT TO SECTIONS 1-5

    1.1 General Principles

    1.1.1 Applicability

    In the first line replace “Australia” with “Cambodia”.

  • 8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard

    43/67

    RBHraCaNacRkkm

  • 8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard

    44/67

    CAM PW 04-102-99 CAMBODIAN STANDARD

    AMENDMENTS TO BASE DOCUMENT BRIDGE DESIGN COMMENTARY

    July 1999 MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORT 

    BLANK

  • 8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard

    45/67

    CAMBODIAN STANDARD CAM PW 04-102-99

    BRIDGE DESIGN COMMENTARY AMENDMENTS TO BASE DOCUMENT

    MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORTJuly 1999 Page 3 of 25

    TABLE OF CONTENTS

    SECTION C1 - GENERAL

    C1.1 General Principles. ........... ........... ......... .......... ........... .......... . ....... ....... ...... ...5

    C1.1.1 Applicability ....................................................................................5

    C1.3 Geometric Requirements - Carriageway Widths and Vertical Clearances. .... ... ..5C1.3.1 Bridge Carriageway Widths........... ........... .......... ....... ....... ....... ....... ...5

    C1.3.2 Edge Clearances for Bridges Without Footways .......... ........... ........... .5

    SECTION C2 - LOADS

    C2.3 Traffic Loading ........... ........... .......... ........... ........... .......... ........ ....... ........ ......5

    C2.3.3 L44 Lane Loading ........... ........... .......... .......... ........... ........... ............ 5

    C2.3.4 Heavy Load Platform Loading.................... .......... ... ....... ....... ....... ......5

    C2.3.5 Number of Lanes for Design and Lateral Position of Loads. .... ... .... ... ... .6

    C2.3.5.2 Heavy load platform loading................... .......... .... .... ...6

    C2.3.8 Fatigue Loading............ ........... ......... .......... ........... ........... ...... ...... ...6

    C2.4 Dynamic Load Allowance...... ........... ........... ..... .......... ........... ........... ............ 6

    C2.4.1 General...........................................................................................6

    C2.4.2 Dynamic Load Allowance - T44 Truck and L 44 Lane Loadings.... .... ... ..6

    C2.5 Horizontal Forces Due to Traffic ........... ........... .......... ........... ........... .......... ....7C2.5.2 Braking forces .......... ........... ........... ........... ........... .......... ........ ....... ..7

    C2.5.4 Minimum Lateral Restraint Capacity - Ultimate Limit State ....... ....... ....7

    C2.8 Wind Loads ................................................................................................8

    C2.8.2 Basic Wind Speeds .......... ........... ........... .......... ........... ........... ....... ..8

    C2.8.2.3 Terrain and structure height multipliers, and... ... .... .... ...8

    C2.8.2.4 Changes in terrain category. .......... ........... ........... ..... .8

    C2.9 Thermal Effects...... ........... ........... .... .......... .......... ........... . ....... ....... ....... ......8

    C2.9.2 Variation in Average Bridge Temperature.......... ........... ........... ............ 8

    C2.9.3 Differential Temperature........... ........... .......... ........... ........... .......... .. 10

    C2.13 Earthquake Forces... ........... .......... ........ .......... .......... ........... . ............. ....... 10

    C2.13.1 General.........................................................................................10

    C2.13.2 Earthquake Resistant Design.......... ........... .......... . ........ ....... ....... .... 10

    C2.13.4 Equivalent Quasi-Static Earthquake Forces........... ........... ........... ..... 11C2.19.3 Design Wind Speeds ..................................................................... 12

    C2.19.3.2 Ultimate limit state.............. ........... ....... ...... ....... ..... 12

    SECTION C3 - FOUNDATIONS .......... ........... ........... .......... ........... ........... ............ 13

    SECTION C4 - BEARINGS AND DECK JOINTS

    C4.3 Loads and Movements.... ........... ........... ....... .......... ........... ........... ...... ....... . 13

    C4.14 Deck Joints...............................................................................................13

    C4.14.7 Proprietary Deck joints.......... ........... ........... .......... ........... ........... ... 13

    SECTION C5 - CONCRETE

    C5.1 Scope and General .......... ........... ........... .......... .......... ........... . ............. ....... 14

    C5.1.1 Scope and Application .......... ........... ........... .......... ........... ........... ... 14

    C5.1.1.2 Application............................................................. 14

    C5.1.5 Construction..................................................................................14

    C5.2 Design Requirements and Procedures........ ........... .......... ... ........ ........ ....... .. 15

    C5.2.4 Design for Serviceability ........... ........... .......... ........... .......... ........... . 15

    C5.2.4.3 Cracking ................................................................ 15

    C5.2 Design for Durability................. ........... .... ........... ........... .......... ...... ....... ......16

    C5.4.3 Exposure Classification..................... ........... . ........... .......... ........... . 16

    C5.4.10 Requirements for Cover to Reinforcing Steel and Tendons..... .... .... ... .. 17

    C5.4.10.3 Cover for Corrosion Protection......... ........... ........... . .. 17

    C5.6 Design Properties and Materials ........... ........... .......... ........... .......... ........... . 17

    C5.6.1 Properties of Concrete............ ........... ......... .......... ........... ........... .... 17

    C5.6.1.7 Shrinkage and ........... ........... .......... ............ ............ 17

  • 8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard

    46/67

    CAM PW 04-102-99 CAMBODIAN STANDARD

    AMENDMENTS TO BASE DOCUMENT BRIDGE DESIGN COMMENTARY

    Page 4 of 25 July 1999 MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORT 

    C5.7.1.8 Creep.....................................................................17

    C5.6.2 Properties of Reinforcement ........... ........... .......... ........... ........... ...... 18

    C5.6.2.1 Strength .................................................................18

    C5.6.3 Properties of Tendons.... ........... ........... ....... .......... ........... ........... ....18

    C5.8.6 Crack Control of Beams........ ........... ........... .. .......... ........... .......... . ..18

    C5.13 Stress Development and Splicing of Reinforcement and Tendons. ... .... ... .... ... .19

    C5.13.1 Stress Development in Reinforcement...... .......... ........... ..... ....... ...... .19C5.13.1.2 Development length of bar in tension. ............ ............ 19

    C5.16 Material Requirements .......... ........... .......... . ........... ........... .......... ...... ...... ...20

    C5.16.1 Material Requirements for Concrete and Grout. .......... ........... ........... .20

    C5.16.2 Material for Reinforcing Steel............ ........... ......... ....... ...... ....... .......20

    C5.16.3 Material Requirements for Prestressing Ducts, Anchorages and

    Tendons........................................................................................21

    C5.16.3.2 Anchorages. ........... .......... ........... ....... ...... ....... .......21

    C5.16.3.4 Tendons ........... ........... .......... .......... ........... ........... .21

    SECTION C6 - STEEL AND COMPOSITE CONSTRUCTION

    C6.2 Materials...................................................................................................21

    C6.2.1 Yield Stress and Tensile Stress used in Design .......... ........... ........... 21

    C6.2.1.3 Equivalent ASTM Standards .......... ........... ........... .....21

    SECTION C7- RATING

    C7.7 SUPPORTING INFORMATION. .......... ........... ........... .......... ........... ........... ...21

    C7.7.1 Publications ..................................................................................21

    C7.7.2 Other Information .......... ........... ........... .......... .......... ........... . ...... .....22

    RAILWAY SUPPLEMENT TO SECTIONS C1-5

    SECTION C2 - DESIGN LOADS

    C2.3 Traffic Loading........... ........... .......... .......... ........... ........... ....... ....... ....... .....23

    C2.3.12 300-A-12 Railway Traffic Loading. .......... ........... .......... ........ ....... ......23

    APPENDIX A

    NAASRA BRIDGE DESIGN SPECIFICATION 1976 - SECTION 3 - LOAD DISTRIBUTION .25

  • 8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard

    47/67

    CAMBODIAN STANDARD CAM PW 04-102-99

    BRIDGE DESIGN COMMENTARY AMENDMENTS TO BASE DOCUMENT

    MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORTJuly 1999 Page 5 of 25

    SECTION C1 - GENERAL

    C1.1 General Principles 

    C1.1.1 Applicability 

    The range of bridges for which the ‘92 AUSTROADS Code is applicable has been

    extended to include railway bridges; Clause 1.1.1 of the Railway Supplement refers.

    The provisions of Clause 1.1.1. have been extended for the use by the Ministry of

    Public Works and Transport and also for use by any other Authority or organisation.

    C1.3 Geometric Requirements - Carriageway Widths and

    Vertical Clearances.

    C1.3.1 Bridge Carriageway Widths 

    The minimum set back distance of the kerb on bridge has been adjusted to suit the other

    adopted horizontal clearances.

    C1.3.2 Edge Clearances for Bridges Without Footways

    The edge clearances on bridges without footways have been coordinated with values

    included in the Road Design Manual.

    SECTION C2 - LOADS

    C2.3 Traffic Loading

    C2.3.3 L44 Lane Loading

    Replace the second paragraph with the following:

    “L 44 has been slightly modified at the request of Cambodian Authorities.

    The tandem of concentrated loads is not intended to represent heavy axles, but it is

    merely an analytical device used to simulate the bending and shearing effectscaused by actual vehicle loading”.

    C2.3.4 Heavy Load Platform Loading.

    Replace the second paragraph with the following:

  • 8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard

    48/67

    CAM PW 04-102-99 CAMBODIAN STANDARD

    AMENDMENTS TO BASE DOCUMENT BRIDGE DESIGN COMMENTARY

    Page 6 of 25 July 1999 MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORT 

    “The application of HLP 240 is mandatory for all bridges on Expressways,

    Highways, Provincial Roads, Secondary Roads and Arterial roads. For bridges on

    other roads it is not mandatory. However, the Authority should consider:“

    C2.3.5 Number of Lanes for Design and Lateral Position ofLoads.

    C2.3.5.2 Heavy load platform loading.

    This Clause has been only amended to include the HLP 240. The Authority may specify

    other special HLP loading on specially designated roads.

    C2.3.8 Fatigue Loading

     No additional commentary is provided.

    C2.4 Dynamic Load Allowance.

    C2.4.1 General

    Replace the last two sentences (commencing with ‘Because…) with the following:

    “The constant dynamic load allowance for T44 and L44 loadings for all span

    lengths is based on the AASHTO approach and its magnitude is broadly that

    corresponding to dynamic responses of short and medium span bridges. Longer

    span bridges normally have low first flexural frequencies and therefore lowerdynamic load allowances may be applicable. However, with increasing length of

    span the ratio of live load to dead load is decreasing and therefore the ratio of the

    dynamic load allowance to the total load is also decreasing. In addition, the CBDS

    also provides for alternative determination of the dynamic load allowance.”

    C2.4.2 Dynamic Load Allowance - T44 Truck and L 44 LaneLoadings

    The dynamic load allowance expressed as a constant percentage of the live load has been adopted for simplicity, instead of the method included in the 1992 AUSTROADS

    Bridge Design Code, which requires to use an approximate value for the design and re-check the adopted value when all the information for calculation of first flexural

    frequency is available.

    To achieve optimum economy for major structures and/or long spans, the Authority mayapprove different values of dynamic load allowances based on tests or dynamic analysis.

  • 8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard

    49/67

    CAMBODIAN STANDARD CAM PW 04-102-99

    BRIDGE DESIGN COMMENTARY AMENDMENTS TO BASE DOCUMENT

    MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORTJuly 1999 Page 7 of 25

    C2.5 Horizontal Forces Due to Traffic

    C2.5.2 Braking forces

    The braking forces between 400 kN and 800 kN specified by the AUSTROADS

    Bridge Design Code have been reduced to between 300 kN for short bridges and

    600 kN for bridges 60 m and longer. Road trains with overall weight exceeding 100 t

    and travelling at high speed are not considered to be applicable in foreseeable future for

    Cambodian roads.

    Magnitudes of the braking forces adopted for the Cambodian Bridge Design Code,

    although lower than the AUSTROADS values, are similar to the braking forces (at

    Ultimate Limit State) specified by the British Code and are somewhat higher,

     particularly for longer bridges, than the braking forces specified at ULS by AASHTO

    and Ontario Codes for up to 3 lanes travelling in the same direction.

    C2.5.4 Minimum Lateral Restraint Capacity - Ultimate Limit State

    Additional Commentary on the revision of the paragraph 3:

    “The Australian Bridge Design Code Clause 2.5.4 specifies some minimum lateral

    restraint loadings where no other loading is specified. The minimum of 500 kN is

    well in excess of many of the normal loadings which would apply. In particular, in

    the case of small bridges over creeks, the likely log impact loadings in the order of

    100 kN are overwhelmed by this 500kN ultimate load. Where there is no vehicularaccess under the bridge, there is no good reasons for such a large load as 500 kN.

    The bridge needs to be restrained to cater for unanticipated loadings such as

    earthquake loadings in a nil earthquake zone, and impact from repair equipment or

    other accidental minor impacts. There is no need to have a load as high as 500 kN

    for this purpose.

    However, a minimum 500 kN load should be retained for all cases where the deck

    may be struck by road, rail or river traffic. A 3.5 metre clearance above the normal

    vehicle or vessel height provides sufficient assurance to minimise the risk of impact

    to a bridge from an anticipated high load.

    The revision of the Clause 2.5.4 is based on the amendment document CBE 98/11

    issued by the Chief Bridge Engineer of the Roads and Traffic Authority of NSW

    authorised for use from 30 July, 1998.”

  • 8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard

    50/67

    CAM PW 04-102-99 CAMBODIAN STANDARD

    AMENDMENTS TO BASE DOCUMENT BRIDGE DESIGN COMMENTARY

    Page 8 of 25 July 1999 MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORT 

    C2.8 Wind Loads

    C2.8.2 Basic Wind Speeds

    Replace the part of the last paragraph commencing with “The current...” with the

    following:

    “The appropriate Serviceability Limit State basic gust design wind speeds have

     been determined from the data provided by the Department of Meteorology inPochentong, Phnom Penh, the undated French report ‘Apercu General sur le

    Climat du Cambodge’ and other sources. In Cambodian conditions the

    Serviceability Limit State design wind speed is uniform at 35 m/sec and the

    Ultimate Limit State wind speeds vary between 45 m/sec inland and 60 m/sec in

    the coastal region close to the coast. Table 2.8.2 replaces references to the

    AS 1170.2.

    Structural importance and shielding factors have been omitted. Use of these factorsin the AUSTROADS Bridge Design Code is reflecting the origin of these

     provisions in the AS 1170.2 which is a wind loading code for all types of

    structures. For bridges the relevance of these factors is not significant.”

    C2.8.2.3 Terrain and structure height multipliers, and

    C2.8.2.4 Changes in terrain category.

    The values in these clauses have been updated in accordance with the draft of the new

    edition of the AS 1170.2.

    C2.9 Thermal Effects

    C2.9.2 Variation in Average Bridge Temperature

    For Cambodia, the Minimum, Maximum and Average Shade Air Temperatures have

     been derived from the information contained in the undated French Report ‘Apercu

    General sur le Climat du Cambodge’ as follows:

  • 8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard

    51/67

    CAMBODIAN STANDARD CAM PW 04-102-99

    BRIDGE DESIGN COMMENTARY AMENDMENTS TO BASE DOCUMENT

    MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORTJuly 1999 Page 9 of 25

    Station Av.

    Annual

    max.

    temp.

    (º C)

    Average

    annual

    min.

    temp.

    (º C)

    Average

    annual

    temp.

    (º C)

    Absolute

    min. (º C)

    Absolute

    max. (ºC)

    Derived

    from a

    period of

    Climatic

    Region

    Stung Treng 31.6 22.6 27.1 9.5 41.4 28 years H

    Siem Riap 32.0 22.7 27.4 9.5 40.3 28 years F

    Battambang 32.5 23.0 27.7 10.4 41.0 20 years F

    Krakor 32.2 23.1 27.7 14.6 39.5 5 years F

    Kompong

    Cham

    (Chhnang)

    32.0 23.4 27.7 12.4 39.3 26 years F

    Pochentong

    (Phnom

    Penh)

    32.2 23.7 27.8 13.3 40.5 42 years F

    Svay Rieng 32.5 23.4 27.9 12.2 38.7 24 years F

    Kampot 31.2 23.6 27.4 14.7 37.2 18 years C

    Sihanoukville 30.3 25.2 27.8 20.5 34.4 4 years C

    The altitudes of all stations but Stung Treng is

  • 8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard

    52/67

    CAM PW 04-102-99 CAMBODIAN STANDARD

    AMENDMENTS TO BASE DOCUMENT BRIDGE DESIGN COMMENTARY

    Page 10 of 25 July 1999 MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORT 

    This information indicates remarkable uniformity of average annual temperatures across

    the country. The most appropriate temperature for the determination of nominal

    dimensions dependant on temperatures (ie for setting of deck openings at deck

    expansion joints, etc.) would appear to be 27 ºC.

    The stations are located in all three climatic zones (Coastal, Flat Lands, High Lands),however, there is only one station located in the High Land Climatic region. The

    elevation of this station is only 54 m and it is therefore not representative for the

    mountainous north eastern region of Cambodia. No climatic information appears to be

    available for this region and the recommended temperature reductions related to high

    elevations are based on information from other tropical regions.

    C2.9.3 Differential Temperature

    Values of T have been revised to reflect the climatic conditions prevailing in Cambodia,

    namely, higher uniformity of temperatures than in Australia.

    In the absence of information on temperature ranges in higher elevations in Cambodia,

    the value of T has been determined from information from other tropical regions.

    C2.13 Earthquake Forces

    C2.13.1 General

    Replace the text with the following:

    “Earthquake severity at different locations is now defined by an acceleration

    coefficient, a, the value of which for Cambodia has been determined by the

    Seismological Centre of the Australian Geological Survey Organisation inCanberra, on the basis of the World Earthquake Database. This indicates that

    there is not a single epicentre in Cambodia. Figure C2.13.1, a copy of the map of

    regional seismicity covering Cambodia and a large area around Cambodia, shows

    the regional tectonics.

    The ISC World Seismograph station list shows that there are no seismographs inCambodia. The records also show that there have been no magnitude 6+

    earthquakes since 1960 and no magnitude 5+ earthquakes since 1980. The nearest

    large earthquake was more than 300 km from the Cambodian border and the plate

     boundaries at least 650 km away.”

    C2.13.2 Earthquake Resistant Design

    Delete second paragraph and replace with the following:

    “In a general situation, design for earthquake resistance must comprise anassessment of the seismicity of the site, an estimation of the induced seismic load

  • 8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard

    53/67

    CAMBODIAN STANDARD CAM PW 04-102-99

    BRIDGE DESIGN COMMENTARY AMENDMENTS TO BASE DOCUMENT

    MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORTJuly 1999 Page 11 of 25

    and an evaluation of the structural system characteristics and the dynamic structural

    response. The subject is discussed in Newmark and Rosenbleuth (1971).

    Evaluation of the dynamic response due to seismic loading of a specified

    acceleration spectrum can be performed with the aid of a number of readily

    available computer programs.”

    F igur e C2.13.1 Map of Regional Seismicity  

    C2.13.4 Equivalent Quasi-Static Earthquake Forces.

    Delete fourth paragraph and replace with the following:

    “The seismicity Factor, α , has been related to the acceleration coefficient, a.”

    Delete sixth paragraph and replace with the following:

  • 8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard

    54/67

    CAM PW 04-102-99 CAMBODIAN STANDARD

    AMENDMENTS TO BASE DOCUMENT BRIDGE DESIGN COMMENTARY

    Page 12 of 25 July 1999 MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANS