Cambodia Bridge Design Standard
-
Upload
cheng-por-eng -
Category
Documents
-
view
227 -
download
0
Transcript of Cambodia Bridge Design Standard
-
8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard
1/67
-
8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard
2/67
RBHraCaNacRkkm
-
8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard
3/67
CAM PW 04-102-99 CAMBODIAN STANDARD
AMENDMENTS TO BASE DOCUMENT BRIDGE DESIGN
July 1999 MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORT
BLANK
-
8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard
4/67
CAMBODIAN STANDARD CAM PW 04-102-99
BRIDGE DESIGN AMENDMENTS TO BASE DOCUMENT
MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORT July 1999 Page 1 of 39
FOREWORD
The Cambodia Bridge Design Standard is intended to be used forthe design of all new road and railway bridges in the Kingdom ofCambodia. The Cambodian Bridge Design Standard consists ofthe following complementary documents:
- CAM PW 04-101-99 Australian Bridge Design Code 1996(the Base Document) and associated Commentary;
- CAM PW 04-102-99 this document (the Amendments)
which contains amendments and additions to the Basedocument; and
- The Commentary on the Cambodian Bridge DesignStandard which contains amendments and additions to theCommentary on the Base Document.
These documents shall be considered together. In the case of aconflict between the provisions of the Base Document and theprovisions of the Amendments, the Amendments shall overridethe Base Document.
From time to time the Base Document may be changed by the
Australian Authorities. Any such change shall be automaticallyincorporated into the Cambodian Bridge Design Standard unlessit conflicts with a provision of the Amendments.
For the purpose of regulating and interpreting the provisions ofthis Standard, the AUTHORITY shall be the Cambodian Ministryof Public Works and Transport.
-
8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard
5/67
CAM PW 04-102-99 CAMBODIAN STANDARD
AMENDMENTS TO BASE DOCUMENT BRIDGE DESIGN
Page 2 of 39 July 1999 MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORT
This document has beenproduced for the Kingdom of
Cambodia as a joint Australia –Cambodia project sponsored bythe Australian Agency forInternational Development(AusAID).
Valuable assistance andoperational advice wasprovided by the staff of theCambodian Ministry of PublicWorks and Transport (MPWT)
Technical research andspecialist input was providedby the Australian consultingfirms of McMillan Britton & KellPty Limited and Willing &Partners Pty Ltd.
Reproduction of extracts from this publication may be made subjectto due acknowledgment of the source.
Although this publication is believed to be correct at the time ofprinting, neither the MPWT nor AusAID accept responsibility for anyconsequences arising from the use of the information contained in it.People using the information should apply, and rely upon, their ownskill and judgement to the particular issue which they areconsidering.
-
8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard
6/67
CAMBODIAN STANDARD CAM PW 04-102-99
BRIDGE DESIGN AMENDMENTS TO BASE DOCUMENT
MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORT July 1999 Page 3 of 39
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART A LIST OF AMENDED CLAUSES IN THE BASE DOCUMENT..... ........... ........... ..... ............ 5
PART B TEXT OF AMENDED CLAUSES IN THE BASE DOCUMENT
Section 1 General 7
1.1 General Principles ..............................................................................................7
1.1.1 Applicability ....................................................................................7
1.3.1 Bridge Carriageway Widths.................... ........... . ....... ....... ....... ....... ...7
1.3.2 Edge Clearances for Bridges Without Footways .......... ........... ........... .7
1.3.4 Vertical Clearance at Structures............... ........... ...... ............. ........... 7
1.10 Australian Standards .......... ........... .......... . ........... ........... .......... ....... ........ ....... ....8
Section 2 Design Loads
2.3 Traffic Loading.... ........... ........... ...... ........... ........... .......... ........... ........... .......... ....9
2.3.3 L44 Lane Loading ............................................................................9
2.3.4 Heavy Load Platform Loading............... ........... ...... ............ ........... ..... 9
2.3.5 Number of Lanes for Design and Lateral Position of Loads.... .... .... ... .. 11
2.3.5.2 Heavy load platform loading ........... ........... .......... ........... ........... ...... 112.3.8 Fatigue Loading............ ........... ......... .......... ........... ........... ....... ...... 11
2.4.2 Dynamic Load Allowance -T44 Truck and L44 Lane loading ... ... ... ... ...11
2.5.2 Braking forces............................................................................... 11
2.5.4 Minimum Lateral Restraint Capacity - Ultimate Limit State ................ 12
2.8 Wind Loads 13
2.8.1 General.........................................................................................13
2.8.2 Basic design wind speed........... ........... .......... .......... ........... ........... 13
2.8.2.1 Derivation of site design gust wind speed (Vz)...................................13
2.8.2.2 Terrain Category.......... ........... ........... .......... ........... ........... ............ 14
2.8.2.3 Terrain and structure height multiplier (M (z,cat) )..................................15
2.8.2.5 Topographic multiplier (Mt)..............................................................17
2.8.3 Transverse wind load........... ........... .......... ........... .......... ........... ..... . 17
2.8.3.1 Area of structure for calculation of transverse wind load, At ................ 18
2.8.3.2 Calculation of drag coefficients, Cd...................................................18
2.8.4 Longitudinal Wind Load.... ........... ........... ...... ........... ........... .......... .. 19
2.8.5 Vertical Wind Load........................................................................ 20
2.9 Thermal Effects................................................................................................ 20
2.9.2 Variation in Average Bridge Temperature.......... ........... ........... ...... .... 20
2.9.3 Differential Temperatures. ........... .......... ........... ....... ....... ....... ....... ...22
2.13 Earthquake Forces...........................................................................................23
2.13.1 General.........................................................................................23
2.13.2 Earthquake Resistant Design.......... ........... .......... . ........ ....... ....... .... 23
2.13.4 Equivalent Quasi-Static Earthquake Forces....... ........... ........... ... ..... . 23
2.19 Road Signs and Lighting Structures .......... ........... ........... .......... ........... ........... ... 24
2.19.3 Design Wind Speeds ..................................................................... 24
2.19.3.2 Ultimate Limit State .......... ........... ........... .......... ........... ........... ..... ..24
2.19.4 Design Wind Pressure ...................................................................24
Section 3 Foundations...................................................................................................26
Section 4 Bearings And Deck Joints ..............................................................................26
Section 5 Concrete
5.1 Scope and General ........... ........... .......... ........... ........... .......... ....... ....... ...... .......27
5.1.1 Scope and Application ...................................................................27
5.1.1.2 Application .................................................................................... 27
5.1.5 Construction..................................................................................27
5.2 Design Requirements and Procedures.... .......... ........... ....... .......... ........... ........... 27
-
8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard
7/67
CAM PW 04-102-99 CAMBODIAN STANDARD
AMENDMENTS TO BASE DOCUMENT BRIDGE DESIGN
Page 4 of 39 July 1999 MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORT
5.2.4 Design for Serviceability. ........... ........... ......... .......... ........... .......... . . 27
5.2.4.3 Cracking....................................................................................... 27
5.4 Design for Durability......................................................................................... 28
5.4.3 Exposure Classification ................................................................. 28
5.4.10 Requirements for Cover to Reinforcing Steel and Tendons .... ... .... .... .. 29
5.4.10.3 Cover for corrosion protection .......... ........... ........... ....... ........ ........ .. 29
5.6 Design Properties of Materials................... ........... .. .......... ........... .......... . ...... ..... 295.6.1 Properties of Concrete ........... .......... ........... .......... ........... ........... ... 29
5.6.1.1 Strength ....................................................................................... 29
5.6.1.7 Shrinkage..................................................................................... 29
5.6.1.8 Creep 29
5.6.2 Properties of Reinforcement ........... ........... .......... ....... ....... ...... ....... 29
5.6.2.1 Strength ....................................................................................... 29
5.6.3 Properties of Tendons......... ........... ........... . .......... ........... ........... .... 30
5.6.3.1 Strength ....................................................................................... 30
5.6.3.2 Modulus of elasticity...................................................................... 30
5.6.3.4 Relaxation of tendons ........... ........... .......... .......... ........... ........... .... 30
5.13 Stress Development and Splicing of Reinforcement and Tendons... .... .... ... .... ... .... . 31
5.13.1 Stress Development in Reinforcement ........... ........... .......... ....... ...... 31
5.13.1.2 Development length for bar in tension. ........... ........... .......... ....... ...... 31
5.14 Joints, Embedded Items, Fixings and Connections ........... ........... .......... ....... ...... 31
5.14.2 Embedded Items and Holes in Concrete...... ........... ........... .... ...... .... 31
5.14.2.2 Limitations of materials .......... ........... ........... .......... ........... ........... .. 31
5.16 Material Requirements...... ........... ........... .... ........... ........... .......... ....... ....... ....... . 31
5.16.1 Material Requirements for Concrete and Grout.. ........... ........... ........ . 31
5.16.1.1 Materials for concrete and grout................ ........... ..... ....... ....... ....... . 31
5.16.1.2 Normal-class concrete......... ........... .......... .. .......... ........... ........... ... 33
5.16.2 Material for Reinforcing Steel... ........... ........... ....... ....... ....... ....... ..... 33
5.16.2.1 Reinforcement...... ........... ........... .... .......... .......... ........... . ...... ...... ... 33
5.16.3 Material Requirements for Prestressing Ducts, Anchorages and
Tendons .............................................................................. 33
5.16.3.4 Tendons. ...................................................................................... 33
Appendix 5A Reference Documents .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... ..... ..... .. 34
Section 6 Steel And Composite Construction
6.2 Materials 35
6.2.1 Yield Stress and Tensile Stress used in Design...... ....... ....... ........ ... 35
6.2.4 Fasteners ..................................................................................... 38
6.3.8 Design for Fire Resistance............................................................. 38
Section 7 Rating .................................................................................................. . 39
Railway Supplement To Sections 1-5
1.1 General Principles............................................................................................ 39
1.1.1 Applicability.................................................................................. 39
-
8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard
8/67
CAMBODIAN STANDARD CAM PW 04-102-99
BRIDGE DESIGN AMENDMENTS TO BASE DOCUMENT
MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORT July 1999 Page 5 of 39
PART A LIST OF AMENDED CLAUSES
IN THE BASE DOCUMENT
Sections 1 to 7:
1.1.1....................... (General Principles) Applicability
1.3.1......................... (Geometric Requirements) Bridge Carriageway Widths
1.3.2......................... Edge Clearances for Bridges Without Footways
1.3.4......................... Vertical Clearance at Structures
1.10.......................... Australian Standards
2.3.3......................... (Traffic Loading) L44 Lane Loading
2.3.4......................... (Traffic Loading) Heavy Platform Loading
2.3.5.2 ...................... (Position of Loads) Heavy load Platform loadings
2.3.8......................... Fatigue Loading
2.4.2......................... (Dynamic Load Allowance) T44 Truck and L44 Lane Loading
2.5.2......................... (Horizontal Forces) Braking Forces2.5.4.........................Minimum Lateral restraint Capacity – Ultimate Limit State
2.8 ............................Wind Loads (incl. All sub-clause s)
2.9.2......................... (Thermal effects) Variation in Average Bridge temperature
2.9.3......................... (Thermal effects) Differential temperatures
2.13.1....................... (Earthquake Effects) General
2.13.2.......................Earthquake Resistant Design
2.13.4.......................Equivalent Quasi-static Earthquake Forces
2.19.3....................... (Road Signs and lighting Structures) Design Wind Speeds
2.19.4.......................Design Wind Pressure
5.1.1.2 ...................... (Scope and Application) Application
5.1.5......................... (Scope and Application) Construction
5.2.4.3 ...................... (Design for Serviceability) Cracking
5.4.3......................... (Design for Durability) Exposure Classification5.4.10.3.................... (Design for Durability) Cover for Corrosion Protection
5.6.1.1 ...................... (Properties of Concrete) Strength
5.6.1.7 ...................... (Properties of Concrete) Shrinkage
5.6.1.8 ...................... (Properties of Concrete) Creep
5.6.2.1 ...................... (Properties of Reinforcement) Strength
5.6.3.1 ...................... (Properties of Tendons) Strength
5.6.3.2 ...................... (Properties of Tendons) Modulus of Elasticity
5.6.3.4 ...................... (Properties of Tendons) Relaxation of Tendons
5.13.1.2.................... (Stress Development in Reinforcement) Development Length for Bar in
Tension
5.14.2.2.................... (Embedded Items and Holes in Concrete) Limitations of Materials
5.16.1.1.................... Materials for Concrete and Grout
5.16.1.2.................... (Material Requirements for Concrete and Grout) Normal-class Concrete
5.16.2.1.................... (Material Requirements for Reinforcing Steel) Reinforcement
5.16.3.4.................... (Material Requirements for Prestressing Ducts , Anchorages and Tendons)
Tendons
5A............................ Appendix 5A Reference Documents
6.2.1......................... Yield Stress and Tensile Stress Used in Design
6.3.8......................... Design for Fire Resistance
Railway Supplement to Sections 1 - 5
-
8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard
9/67
CAM PW 04-102-99 CAMBODIAN STANDARD
AMENDMENTS TO BASE DOCUMENT BRIDGE DESIGN
Page 6 of 39 July 1999 MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORT
1.1.1..........................(General Principles) Applicability
-
8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard
10/67
CAMBODIAN STANDARD CAM PW 04-102-99
BRIDGE DESIGN AMENDMENTS TO BASE DOCUMENT
MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORT July 1999 Page 7 of 39
PART B TEXT OF AMENDED CLAUSES
IN THE BASE DOCUMENT
SECTION 1 GENERAL
1.1 General Principles
1.1.1 Applicability
Add the following paragraph between paragraphs 2 and 3:
“The Cambodian Bridge Design Standard has been prepared for the design of road,
rail and pedestrian bridges and other bridge- related structures under the jurisdiction ofthe Cambodia Ministry of Public Works and Transport, referred to in this document
as the Authority, and also for use by other Authorities and organisations.”
1.3.1 Bridge Carriageway Widths
Page 1.4, Para 2, line 4: replace “600 mm” by “500 mm.”
1.3.2 Edge Clearances for Bridges Without Footways
Replace existing Table 1.3.2 with the following Table:
Table 1.3.2 Edge Clearances for B ri dges Without Footways.
TYPE OF ROAD DESIGN
STANDARD
EDGE CLEARANCE
(EACH SIDE)
Low volume, 2 lane roads,
Projected ADT < 150 vehicles/day
R1,
U1
No clearance minimum,
250 mm preferred
Medium volume, 2 lane roads,
Projected ADT 150 to 3000 vehicles/day
R2, R3
U2, U3
250 mm minimum,
500 mm preferred
High volume, 2 lane roads,
Projected ADT >3000 vehicles/day
R4, R5, R6
U4, U5, U6
500 mm minimum,
1000 mm preferred
Note:
Traffic volumes are the expected Annual Average Daily Traffic volumes 30 years ahead.
Design standards are defined in the Cambodian Road Design Standard Part 1 – Geometry.
1.3.4 Vertical Clearance at Structures
In the last paragraph, replace “AS 1742.2” with “the appropriate Authority”.
-
8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard
11/67
CAM PW 04-102-99 CAMBODIAN STANDARD
AMENDMENTS TO BASE DOCUMENT BRIDGE DESIGN
Page 8 of 39 July 1999 MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORT
1.10 Australian Standards
Delete “Australian” from the first paragraph.
Add the following paragraph:
“References to Australian Standards may generally be replaced by references to an
equivalent or similar standard from another country. Where specific provisions of
Australian Standards are required, these standards are either adopted in their original
form as a Cambodian Standard, or the relevant provisions are reproduced in the textof this Standard.”
-
8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard
12/67
CAMBODIAN STANDARD CAM PW 04-102-99
BRIDGE DESIGN AMENDMENTS TO BASE DOCUMENT
MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORT July 1999 Page 9 of 39
SECTION 2 DESIGN LOADS
2.3 Traffic Loading
2.3.3 L44 Lane Loading
Replace the Article as follows:
“The T44 Lane Loading shall consist of a uniformly distributed load as given in Figure
2.3.3 together with a tandem of two concentrated loads 90 kN each spaced at 1.20
m. The L44 Lane Loading shall be considered as uniformly distributed over the width
of a 3 m Standard Design Lane.
For continuous spans the L44 Lane Loading shall be continuous or discontinuous asmay be necessary to produce maximum effects, and the tandem of concentrated loads
shall be placed in such a position as to produce maximum effects. Only one tandem ofconcentrated loads shall be used per lane except that one additional tandem of
concentrated loads of equal force shall be placed in each lane in one other span in the
series in such a position as to produce maximum negative moment. The L44 LaneLoading does not apply for spans less than 10 m.”
2.3.4 Heavy Load Platform Loading
Replace the whole of Article 2.3.4 with the following:
“(a) The HLP 240 design loading shall be applied to bridges on the following road
categories:
- Expressways
- Highways
- Provincial Roads
- Collector Roads
- Arterial Roads
These roads generally will comply with design standards R6/U6, R5/U5 and
R4/U4 of the Cambodian Road Design Standard Part 1 – Geometry.
(b) For a bridge on any other road category, the Authority shall determine if the
bridge shall be designed for the effects of Heavy Load Platform loadings.
(c) For bridges on special designated routes, as determined by the Authority, aheavy load configuration, which shall be specified by the Authority, shall beapplied.
(d) The Heavy Load Platform (HLP) loadings shall have the following configurations:
i. 12 rows of axles (HLP 240).
-
8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard
13/67
CAM PW 04-102-99 CAMBODIAN STANDARD
AMENDMENTS TO BASE DOCUMENT BRIDGE DESIGN
Page 10 of 39 July 1999 MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORT
ii. The total load per axle shall be 200 kN. The axle load shall be equally
distributed among all wheels.
iii.Axles shall be spaced at 1.8 m centres.
iv. 8 tyres per axle row.
v. The overall width of axles shall be 3.6 m. The lateral spacing of dual wheels
along an axle shall be as shown in Figure 2.3.4.
vi. For continuous bridges, the loading may be separated into two groupsof 6 axles (HLP 240) with a central gap of between 6 m and 15 m,
the gap being chosen to give the most adverse effect.
vii. The tyre contact area for each individual wheel shall be assumed to be
500 mm x 200 mm.”
HLP 240
12 axles @ 200 kN spaced at 1.80 m = total 2400 kN
Overall length 19.80 m
ELEVATION VIEW
1400 mm 1400 mm
3600 mm
END VIEW OF AN HLP AXLE
400500 500 500800400 500
F igur e 2.3.4 Heavy Load Platform Loading
-
8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard
14/67
CAMBODIAN STANDARD CAM PW 04-102-99
BRIDGE DESIGN AMENDMENTS TO BASE DOCUMENT
MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORT July 1999 Page 11 of 39
2.3.5 Number of Lanes for Design and Lateral Position of
Loads
2.3.5.2 Heavy load platform loading
Replace the first paragraph with the following:
“The HLP 240 Heavy Load Platform loading shall be assumed to centrally occupy
two Standard Design Lanes.”
2.3.8 Fatigue Loading
Replace Table 2.3.8 with the following:
Table 2.3.8 Fatigue Stress Cycles for Tr aff ic L oadings
Number of fatigue stress cycles for bridges on roads ofcategory:
Fatigue design trafficloading
Category R6/U6:
Expressways, Highways,
Arterial Roads
All other roads
W7 Wheel loading 2,000,000 500,000
T44 Truck loading 500,000 100,000
L44 Lane loading 100,000 100,000
2.4.2 Dynamic Load Allowance -T44 Truck and L44 Lane
loading
The Dynamic Load Allowance for T44 and L44 loadings shall be 0.35, unless alternative
values based on tests or on dynamic analysis are approved by the Authority.
2.5.2 Braking forces.
For the lengths of the structures between 10m and 60m, the braking force will be:
300 kN + (L-10) m x 6 kN/m
Replace existing Figure 2.5.2 with the Figure on the following page:
-
8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard
15/67
CAM PW 04-102-99 CAMBODIAN STANDARD
AMENDMENTS TO BASE DOCUMENT BRIDGE DESIGN
Page 12 of 39 July 1999 MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORT
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Length of structure considered(m)
B r a k i n g
f o r c e ( k N )
F igur e 2.5.2 Braking Forces
2.5.4 Minimum Lateral Restraint Capacity - Ultimate Limit State
Replace paragraph three with the following:
“Restraints shall have sufficient lateral clearance to allow thermal movements,
especially on wide and curved superstructures. The restraint system for each
continuous section of superstructure shall be capable of resisting an ultimate design
horizontal force normal to the bridge centreline of 200 kN or 5% of the superstructur e
dead load at that support, whichever is greater.
For all bridges over roads, vehicular accesses, railways and navigable waters, the
restraint system shall be designed for an ultimate lateral load of 500 kN in accordance
with the following criteria:
1. Bridges over roads and vehicular accesses. Where the clearance between themaximum legal load and the underside of the structure is less than 3.5 m, the 500 kN
load shall be applied to the superstructure within the width of the road formation.
2. Navigable waters. Where the clearance between the top of the design vessel,
excluding masts and aerials, to the underside of the bridge superstructure is less than3.5 m, the load shall be applied to the superstructure within the width of the navigable
waters.
3. Railways. Where the clearance from the railways clearance zone to the underside
of the superstructure is less than 3.5 m, the load shall be applied to the superstructurewithin the width of the railway clearance zone plus 10 m either side of the railway
clearance zone.”
-
8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard
16/67
CAMBODIAN STANDARD CAM PW 04-102-99
BRIDGE DESIGN AMENDMENTS TO BASE DOCUMENT
MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORT July 1999 Page 13 of 39
2.8 Wind Loads
The whole of Article 2.8 shall be replaced with Clauses 2.8.1 to 2.8.5 as follows:
2.8.1 General
Designing for wind loading is to be based on a static analysis, which is essentially a quasi-
steady analysis approach using a design gust wind speed in conjunction with a mean loading
coefficient. The gust wind speed is the maximum wind speed, averaged over a period of 2to 3 seconds which occurs in one hour. This approach is limited to conventional structures,
(nominally having a first-mode frequency of vibration of less than 1 Hz). For wind sensitive
structures such as suspension or long-span cable-stayed bridges, which may be subject to
significant wind excited dynamic response, special investigations into the dynamic behaviour
of the structure should be carried out.
The methodology for determining the wind loading here is based on the 92' AUSTROADS
Bridge Design Code and the Australian Standard for Wind Loading, AS 1170.2, to whichacknowledgments are made.
2.8.2 Basic design wind speed
The basic gust design wind speeds that shall be used are referenced to a standard exposure
of 10m height above open country terrain, for Serviceability and Ultimate Limit State design
conditions, defined by 20 and 2000 year Return Periods respectively. These are given for
the three Cambodian Regions in Table 2.8.2.
TABL E 2.8.2 Basic Gust Design Wind Speeds (m/sec)
Region Description Serviceability
Limit State
Vs
Ultimate
Limit State
Vu
A Coastal Region within 50 km from the
coast
Coasta l Region for 50 to 100 km from the
coast
35
35
60
50
B Coastal Region beyond 100 km from the
coast and Flat Land Region 35 45
C High Land 35 45
2.8.2.1 Derivation of site design gust wind speed (Vz)
The design gust wind speed (Vz) at the site and for height, z , shall be calculated from theappropriate limit state basic wind speed given in Table 2.8.2 as follows:
-
8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard
17/67
CAM PW 04-102-99 CAMBODIAN STANDARD
AMENDMENTS TO BASE DOCUMENT BRIDGE DESIGN
Page 14 of 39 July 1999 MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORT
Vz = V M(z,cat) Mt
Where
Vz = The site design gust wind speed at height z, in metres per
second
V = The basic wind speed, (Vu) or (Vs) (see Table 2.8.2), in
metres per second
M(z,cat ) = A gust wind speed multiplier at height z for a terrain
category with upwind distance of at least 2500 m (see
Table 2.8.2.3)
Mt = A topographic multiplier which shall be 1.0 if the
approaching slopes are less than 0.05.
Note: M z,cat may change from the tabulated values if the structure site is within
the transition zone near the edge of a terrain boundary (see Clause
2.8.2.4)
Irrespective of the calculation in this Clause, the ultimate limit state site design gust wind
speed (Vz), shall not be less than 30 m/sec.
For serviceability limit state wind loads in conjunction with traffic loads on a structure, the
selection of a wind speed for a specified return interval is not appropriate and the designwind speed shall be taken as 35 m/sec in all locations. The effect of wind on the traffic load
need not be considered.
2.8.2.2 Terrain Category
Terrain, over which the approach wind flows towards a structure, shall be assessed on the basis of the following category descriptions:
(a) Category 1 Exposed open terrain with few or no obstructions and water
surfaces at serviceability wind speeds (Vs) only.
(b) Category 2 Open terrain, grassland with few well scattered obstructions
having heights generally from 1.5m to 10.0m and water
surfaces for Vu.
(c) Category 3 Terrain with numerous closely spaced obstructions having the
size of domestic houses (3.0m to 5.0m high).
(d) Category 4 Terrain with numerous large, high (10.0m to 30.0m high) and
closely spaced obstructions such as large city centres and
well-developed industrial complexes.
Selection of terrain category shall be made with due regard to the permanence of the
obstructions which constitute the surface roughness, in particular vegetation in tropical
cyclonic regions shall not be relied upon to maintain a wooded terrain roughness.
-
8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard
18/67
CAMBODIAN STANDARD CAM PW 04-102-99
BRIDGE DESIGN AMENDMENTS TO BASE DOCUMENT
MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORT July 1999 Page 15 of 39
2.8.2.3 Terrain and structure height multiplier (M (z,cat) )
The variation of terrain multipliers with height (z) shall be taken from Tables 2.8.2.3.(A) and
2.8.2.3 (B). Designers shall take account of probable future changes to terrain roughness in
assessment of terrain and structure height multipliers M (z,cat)
TABLE 2.8.2.3 (A) Terrain and Structure Height Mul tipli ers for Gust
Wind Speeds in Ful ly Developed Terrains in Region A
Height (z) Multiplier M (z,cat)
M Terrain Category 1&2 Terrain Category 3&4
≤ 35
10
15
20
30
40
50
75
≥ 100
0.90
0.95
1.00
1.07
1.13
1.20
1.25
1.29
1.35
1.40
0.80
0.80
0.89
0.95
1.05
1.15
1.25
1.29
1.35
1,40
TABLE 2.8.2.3 (B) Terrain and Structure Height Mul tipli ers for Gust
Wind Speeds in Ful ly Developed Terrains in Regions B & C
Multiplier M (z,cat)Height (z)
MTerrain
Category 1
Terrain
Category 2
Terrain
Category 3
Terrain
Category 4
≤ 35
10
15
20
30
40
0.99
1.05
1.12
1.16
1.19
1.22
1.24
0.85
0.91
1.00
1.05
1.08
1.12
1.16
0.75
0.75
0.83
0.89
0.94
1.00
1.04
0.75
0.75
0.75
0.75
0.75
0.80
0.85
-
8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard
19/67
CAM PW 04-102-99 CAMBODIAN STANDARD
AMENDMENTS TO BASE DOCUMENT BRIDGE DESIGN
Page 16 of 39 July 1999 MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORT
50
75
100
150200
1.25
1.27
1.29
1.311.32
1.18
1.22
1.24
1.271.29
1.07
1.12
1.16
1.211.24
0.90
0.98
1.03
1.111.16
2.8.2.4 Changes in terrain category
Where, for the direction under consideration, the wind approaches across ground
with changes in terrain category within 2500 m of the structure, M (z,cat) shall betaken as the weighted average terrain and structure height multiplier over the
2500m upwind of the structure at height z above ground level.
For evaluation at height z , a change in terrain incorporates a lag distance ( x i)25.1
,
,3.0
=
r o
r oi z
z z x
z o,r = larger of the two roughness lengths at a boundary between roughnesses (given in
Table 2.8.2.4)
z = height of the structure for which the design velocity is required.
Note: For height less than 10m the lag distance should be taken as 1.0.
TABLE 2.8.2.4 Roughness Lengths for Terrain Categor ies
Terrain category Roughness length (m)
Terrain category 1 0.002
Terrain category 2 0.02
Terrain category 3 0.2
Terrain category 4 2
The weighted average of Mz,cat is weighted by the length of each terrain upwind
of the structure allowing for the lag distance at each terrain category change for a
distance of 2500 m, as shown in Figure 2.8.2.4.
-
8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard
20/67
CAMBODIAN STANDARD CAM PW 04-102-99
BRIDGE DESIGN AMENDMENTS TO BASE DOCUMENT
MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORT July 1999 Page 17 of 39
2500
33,44,22,
,
t z t z t z
cat z
x M x M x M M
++= for the case illustrated
F igure 2.8.2.4 Changes in Terrain Category
2.8.2.5 Topographic multiplier (Mt)
For bridge sites approach slopes are usually less than 0.05, and for which Mt = 1.0.
However, if approach slopes are greater than 0.05 the Topographic Multiplier from Table3.2.8 in AS 1170.2-1989 shall be used.
2.8.3 Transverse wind loadThe transverse wind load shall be taken as acting horizontally at the centroids of theappropriate areas, and shall be calculated as follows:
(a) Serviceability design transverse wind load Wt s*
Wt s* = 0.0006 Vs2 At Cd (kN)
(b) Ultimate design transverse wind load Wtu*
Wtu* = 0.0006 Vu At Cd (kN)
where:
Vs = design wind speed for Serviceability Limit States (m/sec)
Vu = design wind speed for Ultimate Limit States (m/sec)
At = area of the structure for calculation of wind load (m2)
Cd = drag coefficient.
2500 m
lag distance
x i tc3 / tc4
Terrain cat 3 Terrain cat 4 Terrain cat 2
lag distance
xi tc4 / tc2
xt3 x t4 x t2
z z
Wind direction
-
8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard
21/67
CAM PW 04-102-99 CAMBODIAN STANDARD
AMENDMENTS TO BASE DOCUMENT BRIDGE DESIGN
Page 18 of 39 July 1999 MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORT
2.8.3.1 Area of structure for calculation of transverse wind load, At
The area of the structure or element under consideration shall be the solid area in normal
projected elevation subject to the following provisions:
(a) Superstructures with solid parapets
The area of the superstructure shall include the area of the solid windward parapet,
but the effect of the leeward parapet need not be considered.
(b) Superstructures with open parapets
The total load shall be the sum of the loads for the superstructure, the windward
barrier and the leeward barrier considered separately. Where there are more than
two parapets or safety fences, irrespective of the width of the superstructure, only
those two elements having the greatest unshielded effect shall be considered.
(c) Piers
Shielding shall not be considered.
2.8.3.2 Calculation of drag coefficients, Cd
(a) Drag coefficient for all superstructures with solid elevation
For superstructures with or without traffic load, C d shall be derived from
Figure 2.8.3.2 where
b = depth of bridge between outer faces of parapets
d = depth of superstructure (including solid parapet if applicable).
(b) Drag coefficient for truss girder superstructures
The wind force on truss girder superstructures shall be calculated by considering each
component individually, using the drag coefficients C d from Appendix B in AS 1170.2.
(c) Drag coefficients for beams during erection
The drag coefficient for beams and girders during erection stages shall be calculatedfor individual beams using Figure 2.8.3.2. Shielding shall not be considered for
individual beams, but may be allowed for when two or more beams are connected, provided the ratio of the clear distance between beams to the depth does not exceed
7. Under such circumstances, the drag coefficient for the combination may be taken
as 1.5 times the value for an individual beam.
-
8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard
22/67
CAMBODIAN STANDARD CAM PW 04-102-99
BRIDGE DESIGN AMENDMENTS TO BASE DOCUMENT
MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORT July 1999 Page 19 of 39
(d) Drag coefficient for parapet railings, parapet barriers and substructures.
Drag coefficients shall be obtained from Appendix B in AS 1170.2.
F igur e 2.8.3.2 Drag Coeff icient C d for Superstructur es with Soli d
Elevation
NOTES
1. The values given assume a vertical elevation and a horizontal wind
2. Where the windward face is inclined to the vertical, the drag coefficient Cd may be reduced by
0.5% per degree of inclination from the vertical, subject to a maximum reduction of 30%.
3. Where the windward face consists of a vertical and a sloping part or two sloping parts inclined
at different angles, the wind load shall be derived as follows:
(a) The basic drag coefficient Cd is calculated using the total depth of the structure.
(b) For each non-vertical face, the basic drag coefficient calculated above is reduced in
accordance with Note 2.
(c) The total wind load is calculated by applying the appropriate drag coefficients to the
relevant areas.
4. Where a superstructure is superelevated, Cd shall be increased by 3% per degree of inclination
to the horizontal, but not by more than 25%.
5. Where a superstructure is subject to wind inclined at not more than 5 degrees to the horizontal,
Cd shall be increased by 15%. Where the angle of inclination exceeds 5 degrees, the drag
coefficient shall be derived from tests.
6. Where a superstructure is superelevated and also subject to inclined wind, the drag coefficient
shall be the subject of special investigation.
2.8.4 Longitudinal Wind Load
For piers, truss bridges and other superstructure forms which present a significant surface
area to wind loads parallel to the longitudinal centreline of the structure, a longitudinal wind
-
8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard
23/67
CAM PW 04-102-99 CAMBODIAN STANDARD
AMENDMENTS TO BASE DOCUMENT BRIDGE DESIGN
Page 20 of 39 July 1999 MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORT
load shall be considered. The serviceability and ultimate design longitudinal wind loads shall
be calculated in a manner similar to those for transverse wind loads.
Longitudinal wind loads on the superstructure may also be significant during the construction
stage of some bridge types which are not affected by these loads at normal service levels.
2.8.5 Vertical Wind Load
An upward or downward vertical wind load, acting at the centroid of the appropriate area,
shall be calculated as follows:
(a) Serviceability design vertical wind load W vs* (kN)
Wvs* = 0.00045 Vs
2 A p
(b) Ultimate design vertical wind load W vu* (kN)
Wvu* = 0.00045 Vu
2 A p
whereVx = design wind speed for Serviceability Limit States (m/sec)
Vu = design wind speed for Ultimate Limit States (m/sec)
A p = bridge area in plan (m2).
The above relationships may be used provided the angle of inclination of the wind to the
structure is less than 5 degrees. For inclinations in excess of 5 degrees, the lift coefficientshall be investigated by testing.
2.9 Thermal Effects
2.9.2 Variation in Average Bridge Temperature
Second paragraph, delete the following sentence:
“eg frost pockets and sheltered low-lying areas where the minimum shade air
temperature may be substantially lower”
Replace the Table 2.9.2 (a) with the following:
-
8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard
24/67
CAMBODIAN STANDARD CAM PW 04-102-99
BRIDGE DESIGN AMENDMENTS TO BASE DOCUMENT
MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORT July 1999 Page 21 of 39
Table 2.9.2 (a) Shade Ai r Temperatures
SHADE AIR TEMPERATURES ( 0 C)
CLIMATIC REGION (1) Maximum Minimum
Coastal (2)
Flat Land and High Land (3)
40
42
11
8
Notes: 1) For the extent of climatic regions refer to Figure 2.9.2
2) For locations less than 20 km from the sea coast the maximum temperature
may be reduced by 2 0 C and the minimum temperature increased by 3 0 C
3) For locations with altitude greater than 1000 m above the sea level the
maximum temperature shall be reduced by 10 0 C and the minimum
temperature shall be reduced by 5 0 C.
-
8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard
25/67
CAM PW 04-102-99 CAMBODIAN STANDARD
AMENDMENTS TO BASE DOCUMENT BRIDGE DESIGN
Page 22 of 39 July 1999 MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORT
Add the following Figure 2.9.2:
F igur e 2.9.2 Climatic Regions in Cambodia
2.9.3 Differential Temperatures.
In Figure 2.9.3, replace the “Regional Values for T” and associated information with the
following:
LOCATION OF THE BRIDGE T
1. All locations less than 500 m above sea level
2. All locations more than 500 m above sea level
13 0C
18 0C
-
8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard
26/67
CAMBODIAN STANDARD CAM PW 04-102-99
BRIDGE DESIGN AMENDMENTS TO BASE DOCUMENT
MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORT July 1999 Page 23 of 39
2.13 Earthquake Forces
2.13.1 General
Replace the whole of the Clause with the following:
“There are no records of seismographs inside Cambodia in the World Earthquake
database. Information gathered in neighbouring countries indicates there are no
recorded epicentres in Cambodia.
A uniform acceleration coefficient of a = 0.05 is considered to be appropriate
throughout Cambodia.”
2.13.2 Earthquake Resistant Design
Insert between the second and the third paragraph:
“As a minimum requirement for conditions prevailing in Cambodia, the ends of deck at
abutments and at piers of simply supported structures shall allow for a minimum 200
mm of horizontal displacement additional to displacements calculated for otherloadings, without falling off the edge of the support.”
2.13.4 Equivalent Quasi-Static Earthquake Forces
(a) Seismicity factor, α
Delete Table 2.13.4.1 and replace the text with the following:
“The value of Seismicity Factor shall be determined by the application of the following
relationship to the acceleration coefficient, a:
For a # 0.08 α = 0.13”
(e) Site-structure resonance factor, S
Replace the text with the following:
“The Site-Structure Resonance Factor shall be either taken as 1.5 or determined from
Table 2.13.4 (e):
-
8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard
27/67
CAM PW 04-102-99 CAMBODIAN STANDARD
AMENDMENTS TO BASE DOCUMENT BRIDGE DESIGN
Page 24 of 39 July 1999 MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORT
Tabl e 2.13.4.(e) Site-Structu re Resonance Factors
SOIL PROFILE SITE-STRUCTURE
RESONANCE
FACTOR S
A profile of rock materials with rock strength low or better 0.67
A soil profile with either;
(a) Rock material with extreme low or very low strength
characterised by shear wave velocities greater than 760 m/sec, or
(b) not more than 30 m of :medium dense to very dense coarse
sands and gravels;
firm, stiff or hard clays; or
controlled fill
1.0
A soil profile with more than 30 m of :
Medium dense to very dense coarse sand and gravels :
Firm, stiff or hard clays; or
Controlled fill
1.25
A soil profile with a total depth of 20 m or more and containing 6 to 12 m
of:
Very soft to soft clays;
Very loose or loose sands;
Silts; or
Uncontrolled fill
1.5
A soil profile with more than 12 m of;
Very soft to soft clays:
Very loose or loose sands;
Silts; or
Uncontrolled fill characterised by shear wave velocities less
than 150 m/sec
2.0
2.19 Road Signs and Lighting Structures
2.19.3 Design Wind Speeds
2.19.3.2 Ultimate Limit State
Replace the first line with the following:
“The basic design gust wind speed shall be:”
Replace “200 year return interval wind speed *” with “ 0.85 Vu* ”
Replace “* Determine from AS 1170.2” with “ The design wind speed, Vu, shall be
determined from Clause 2.8.2.1 which includes the application of height and topographical
multipliers.”
2.19.4 Design Wind Pressure
The design wind pressure q* (kPa), for Serviceability or Ultimate Limit States, may be
calculated using the following equivalent dynamic pressure approach:
-
8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard
28/67
CAMBODIAN STANDARD CAM PW 04-102-99
BRIDGE DESIGN AMENDMENTS TO BASE DOCUMENT
MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORT July 1999 Page 25 of 39
32* 1061.0 −= V C Q d where
V = the basic wind speed (VU) or (VS) (see Table 2.8.2), in metres per second.
Cd = drag coefficient, determined from AS1170.2 or Table 2.19.4, as appropriate.
Note: For tall slender structures, such as high masts, the equivalent dynamic pressure
approach may be unconservative. As an alternative the gust-energy or gust-factor method of determining design wind loads may be employed.
-
8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard
29/67
CAM PW 04-102-99 CAMBODIAN STANDARD
AMENDMENTS TO BASE DOCUMENT BRIDGE DESIGN
Page 26 of 39 July 1999 MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORT
SECTION 3 FOUNDATIONS
The AUSTROADS Code includes provisions for the determination of ultimate pile
resistance design of pile footings by a choice of methods, including static analysis, dynamic
analysis or static load testing, and provides the appropriate material factors fordetermination of the design resistances.
In view of the broad range of acceptable methods, which also include the current practice
in Cambodia, it is not considered necessary to modify this Section.
The following Australian Standards referred to in the text have been replaced:
AS 2042 replaced by AS 2041
AS1342 replaced by AS 4058
SECTION 4 BEARINGS AND DECK JOINTS
There are no amendments to Section 4 except that AS 1511, referred to in Clause 4.14.3,has been replaced by AS 4100.
Refer to Section 4 Commentary for revised Articles C4.3 and C4.17
-
8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard
30/67
CAMBODIAN STANDARD CAM PW 04-102-99
BRIDGE DESIGN AMENDMENTS TO BASE DOCUMENT
MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORT July 1999 Page 27 of 39
SECTION 5 CONCRETE
5.1 Scope and General
5.1.1 Scope and Application
5.1.1.2 Application
Add after (a):
“Compressive strength of concrete is defined in this Code on the basis of tests carried
out on standard test cylinders 150 mm diameter by 300 mm long. Where concrete
strength is to be determined on the basis of tests carried out on samples of other
dimensions, this fact shall be clearly stated on the drawings and in the specification.
Where standard 150 mm x 150 mm x 150 mm concrete cubes are used for testing,the equivalent standard cylinder strength may be obtained from:
''
10'
15log2.076.0 cube
cubec f
f f
+=
5.1.5 Construction
Add the following paragraph at the end of the Article:
“The tolerances for position and size of the structure and members are reproduced in
Clause C5.15. More stringent tolerances may be required for reasons ofserviceability, fit of components, or aesthetics of the structure. These will be specified
in the Construction Specifications issued by relevant Authorities.”
5.2 Design Requirements and Procedures
5.2.4 Design for Serviceability
5.2.4.3 Cracking
Refer to the Commentary for examples of additional requirements stipulated by some RoadAuthorities in Australia to supplement the requirements related to cracking.
-
8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard
31/67
CAM PW 04-102-99 CAMBODIAN STANDARD
AMENDMENTS TO BASE DOCUMENT BRIDGE DESIGN
Page 28 of 39 July 1999 MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORT
5.4 Design for Durability.
5.4.3 Exposure Classification
Replace the existing Table 5.4.3 with the new Table 5.4.3.
Table 5.4.3 Exposure Classif ications
SURFACE AND EXPOSURE ENVIRONMENT EXPOSURE
CLASSIFICATION
1 SURFACES OF MEMBERS IN CONTACT WITH THE GROUND (Note
1)
(a) Members in non-aggressive soil (Note 2)
(b) Members protected by a damp-proof membrane
(c) Members in aggressive soils (Note 3)
B1
A
U
2 SURFACES OF MEMBERS IN INTERIOR ENVIRONMENT
Fully enclosed within a structure except for a brief period of
weather exposure during construction. A
3 SURFACES OF MEMBERS IN ABOVE-GROUND EXTERIOR
ENVIRONMENTS IN AREAS THAT ARE:
(a) Inland & near-coastal (> 1 km from coastline).
(b) Coastal (Up to 1 km from coast -line but excluding tidal and
splash zones) (Note 4).
B1
B2
4 SURFACES OF MEMBERS IN WATER (Note 1)
(a) In fresh water
(b) In sea water or ground water containing salt:
(i) permanently submerged
(ii) In tidal or splash zone
(c) In soft or running water
B1
B2
C
U
5 SURFACES OF MEMBERS IN OTHER ENVIRONMENTS
Any exposure environment not described in Items 1 to 4 above UNote s: 1) Members, such as piles without permanent steel casing, shall be classified as members
in water unless it is proved by geotechnical investigation that no part of the member is
below the permanent water table level.
2) If testing has been undertaken to ascertain that the soil in contact with concrete is non-
aggressive, then exposure classification A may be used, provided that the soil is not
subject to wetting and drying. Typically, members in the top 500 mm of soil would not
qualify for this reduction.
3) Permeable soils with pH < 4.0 or with ground level containing more than one gram per litre
of sulphate ions, would be considered aggressive.
4) For the purpose of this Table, the coastal zone includes locations within 1 km of the
shoreline of the large expanses of salt water, eg river deltas affected by tides. Where thereare strong prevailing winds or vigorous surf, the distance should be incr eased beyond 1
km and higher levels of protection should be considered. Proximity to small salt water
bays, estuaries and rivers may be disregarded, except for structures immediately over or
adjacent to such bodies of water.
-
8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard
32/67
CAMBODIAN STANDARD CAM PW 04-102-99
BRIDGE DESIGN AMENDMENTS TO BASE DOCUMENT
MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORT July 1999 Page 29 of 39
5.4.10 Requirements for Cover to Reinforcing Steel and
Tendons
5.4.10.3 Cover for corrosion protection
Add at the end of Clause 5.4.10.3 (b):
“In cases where the standard of formwork is likely to be lesser than specified by
AS 3610 - Formwork for Concrete, the values in Table 5.4.10.3 (A) shall be suitably
increased.”
5.6 Design Properties of Materials
5.6.1 Properties of Concrete
5.6.1.1 Strength
Add at the end of this Clause:
“For the definition of the compressive strength of concrete refer to Clause 5.1.1.2.”
5.6.1.7 Shrinkage
For the applicability of the curves for the shrinkage coefficient k 1 appropriate for the relative
humidities applicable in Cambodia refer to clause C5.6.1.7.
5.6.1.8 Creep
For the applicability of the curves for the creep factor coefficient k 2 appropriate for the
relative humidities applicable in Cambodia refer to clause C5.6.1.8.
5.6.2 Properties of Reinforcement
5.6.2.1 Strength
Add the following paragraph after the existing first paragraph:
“Reinforcing bars, steel hard drawn wires and welded wire fabric to the ASTM
Standards may be also used follows:
Type Australian Standard ASTM Standard
Deformed bars AS 1302 A 615 Grade 60*
Steel wire AS 1303 A 185
Welded wire fabric AS 1304 A 82
* Bars to A 615 are not weldable.”
-
8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard
33/67
-
8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard
34/67
CAMBODIAN STANDARD CAM PW 04-102-99
BRIDGE DESIGN AMENDMENTS TO BASE DOCUMENT
MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORT July 1999 Page 31 of 39
5.13 Stress Development and Splicing of Reinforcement
and Tendons
5.13.1 Stress Development in Reinforcement
5.13.1.2 Development length for bar in tension.
(b) Deemed-to-comply development length
Add the following:
“(vi) f sy does not exceed 400 MPa.”
5.14 Joints, Embedded Items, Fixings and Connections
5.14.2 Embedded Items and Holes in Concrete
5.14.2.2 Limitations of materia ls
In Article (a) replace “AS 3600” by “the Authority”.
5.16 Material Requirements
5.16.1 Material Requirements for Concrete and Grout
5.16.1.1 Materials for concrete and grout
(a) Portland Cement
Add the following at the end of the sub-clause:
“Cement complying with ASTM C150 Standard Specification for Portland Cement
Type I would also be acceptable.”
(b) Blended cements.
Add the following at the end of the sub-clause:
“ASTM C595M Standard Specification for Blended Hydraulic Cements (Metric) is
the nearest equivalent ASTM specification that covers blended cements. It contains
more types than the Australian Standard.”
(c) Fly ash.
Replace “AS 3583.1” with “AS 3582.1”.
-
8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard
35/67
CAM PW 04-102-99 CAMBODIAN STANDARD
AMENDMENTS TO BASE DOCUMENT BRIDGE DESIGN
Page 32 of 39 July 1999 MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORT
Add the following at the end of the sub-clause:
“The ASTM C618 Standard Specification for coal Fly Ash and Raw or Calcined
Natural Pozzolan for Use as a Mineral Admixture in Concrete is the nearest
equivalent.”
(d) Slag.
Replace “AS 3972” with “AS 3582.1”.
Add the following at the end of the sub-clause:
“The ASTM C989 Standard Specification for Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag
for Use in Concrete and Mortars is the nearest ASTM equivalent.”
Add new sub-clause after (d) as follows:
“(e) Silica fume
Silica fume shall comply with AS 3582.3
The ASTM C 1240 Standard specification for Silica Fume for Use as a Mineral
Admixture in Hydraulic Cement, Concrete, Mortar and Grout is the nearest
equivalent.”
Renumber existing sub-clause (e) as follows:
“(f) Aggregates”
and add the following to the end of the renumbered sub-clause:
“ASTM C33 Standard Specification for Concrete Aggregates is the nearest
equivalent ASTM standard.”
Renumber existing sub-clause (f) as follows:
“(g) Water ”
Renumber existing sub-clause (g) as follows:
“(h) Chemical admixtures”
and add the following to the end of the renumbered sub-clause:
“ASTM C494 Standard Specification for Chemical Admixtures in Concrete is thenearest equivalent standard. Other relevant ASTM Standards are ASTM C260
-
8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard
36/67
CAMBODIAN STANDARD CAM PW 04-102-99
BRIDGE DESIGN AMENDMENTS TO BASE DOCUMENT
MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORT July 1999 Page 33 of 39
Standard Specification for Air-entraining Admixtures of Concrete and ASTM C1017
Standard Specification for Chemical Admixtures for Use in Producing Flowing
Concrete.
Cellulose-type chemical water thickeners may be used in grout (See SAA MP 20
Part 3).”
Renumber existing sub-clause (h) as follows:
“(i) Other materials”
5.16.1.2 Normal-class concrete
Replace Article 5.16.1.2 (d)(i) with the following:
“Cement shall comply with AS 3972 alone or in combination with one or more
cementitious materials.”
5.16.2 Material for Reinforcing Steel
5.16.2.1 Reinforcement
At the end of the Article, add the following:
“Alternative ASTM Standards are listed in Article 5.6.2.1.”
5.16.3 Material Requirements for Prestressing Ducts,
Anchorages and Tendons
5.16.3.4 Tendons.
At the end of the first paragraph add the following:
“The nearest equivalent ASTM standards are:
ASTM 416-96 Standard Specification for Steel Strand, Uncoated Seven-Wire
for Prestressed ConcreteASTM A722-97 Standard Specification for Uncoated High-Strength Steel Bar for
Prestressing Concrete.
ASTM A882/A882M-96 Standard Specification for Epoxy-Coated Seven-WirePrestressing Steel Strand.
ASTM A886/A886M-96 Standard specification for Steel Strand, Indented, Seven-Wire Stress-Relieved for Prestressed Concrete.”
-
8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard
37/67
CAM PW 04-102-99 CAMBODIAN STANDARD
AMENDMENTS TO BASE DOCUMENT BRIDGE DESIGN
Page 34 of 39 July 1999 MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORT
Appendix 5A Reference Documents
Add the following references:
“AS 3582.1 Supplementary Cementitious Materials for use with Portland and
Blended Cement - Fly Ash AS 3582.2 Supplementary Cementitious Materials for use with Portland and
Blended Cement - Ground Granulated Iron Blast Furnace Slag
AS 3582.3 Supplementary Cementitious Materials for use with Portland and
Blended Cement - Silica Fume
ASTM A615 Standard Specification for Deformed and Plain Billet Steel Bars for
Concrete Reinforcement
ASTM A185 Standard Specification for Steel Welded Wire Fabric, Plain, for
Concrete Reinforcement
ASTM A82 Standard Specification for Steel Wire, Plain, for Concrete
Reinforcement
ASTM 416-96 Standard Specification for Steel Strand, Uncoated Seven-Wire for
Prestressed Concrete
ASTM A722-97 Standard Specification for Uncoated High-Strength Steel Bar for
Prestressing Concrete.
ASTM A882/A882M-96 Standard Specification for Epoxy-Coated Seven-Wire
Prestressing Steel Strand.
ASTM A886/A886M-96 Standard specification for Steel Strand, Indented, Seven-Wire
Stress-Relieved for Prestressed Concrete.
ASTM C150 Standard Specification for Portland Cement Type I would also be
acceptable.
ASTM C595M Standard Specification for Blended Hydraulic Cements (Metric)
ASTM C618 Standard Specification for coal Fly Ash and Raw or Calcined Natural
Pozzolan for Use as a Mineral Admixture in Concrete
ASTM C989 Standard Specification for Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag
for Use in Concrete and Mortars
ASTM C1240 Standard specification for Silica Fume for Use as a Mineral Admixture in
Hydraulic Cement, Concrete, Mortar and Grout ASTM C33 Standard Specification for Concrete Aggregates
ASTM C494 Standard Specification for Chemical Admixtures in Concrete
ASTM C260 Standard Specification for Air-entraining Admixtures of Concrete
ASTM C1017 Standard Specification for Chemical Admixtures for Use in Producing
Flowing Concrete.”
The following Australian Standards referred to in Section 5 have been withdrawn:
AS1312
AS 1314
-
8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard
38/67
CAMBODIAN STANDARD CAM PW 04-102-99
BRIDGE DESIGN AMENDMENTS TO BASE DOCUMENT
MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORT July 1999 Page 35 of 39
SECTION 6 STEEL AND COMPOSITE
CONSTRUCTION
6.2 Materials
6.2.1 Yield Stress and Tensile Stress used in Design.
Add the following new Article after 6.2.1.1:
“6.2.1.3 Equivalent ASTM Standards
The revised Table 6.2.1 includes nearest, but not exact, equivalent ASTM Standards
and Grades. An exact equivalent is not possible to specify as there is sometimes none
available or because part of the standard complies, but other part may not (eg the
range of thicknesses).
In critical cases both standards (AS and ASTM) should be compared and the
designer should establish the full compatibility of the ASTM Standard for the intended
use.
Table 6.2.1 Strength of Steels Complying wi th AS 1163, AS 1594, AS
3678 and AS 3679.
Steel
Standard
Form Steel Grade Thickness
of material
(t), (mm)
Yield
Stress
(MPa)
Tensile
Strength
(MPa)
ASTM
No.
ASTM
Grade
C450 All 450 500
C450 L0 All 450 500
C350
C350L0
All 350 430
AS 1163 Hollow Sections
C250
C250L0
All 250 320
Plate & Strip XF500 All 480
(see
Note)
570 A715 Gr 70
Plate, Strip &
Floorplate
Hd400 All 400 460 A572 Gr 60
t ≤ 3.5 380 460 A715 Gr 60 Plate & Strip XF400
t > 3.5 360 440 A715 Gr 60
Plate, Strip &Floorplate
Hd350 All 350 430 A572 Gr 50
Plate & Strip HW350 All 340 450 A606
Hd300/1 All 300 430 A414 Gr BPlate, Strip &
FloorplateHd300 All 300 400 A572 Gr 42
Plate & Strip XF300 All 300 440 A715 Gr 50
Hd250 All 250 350 A36
AS 1594
Plate, Strip &
FloorplateHd200 All 200 300 A570 Gr 30
-
8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard
39/67
CAM PW 04-102-99 CAMBODIAN STANDARD
AMENDMENTS TO BASE DOCUMENT BRIDGE DESIGN
Page 36 of 39 July 1999 MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORT
Table 6.2.1 (Continued)
Steel
Standard
Form Steel Grade Thickness
of material
(t), (mm)
Yield
Stress
(MPa)
Tensile
Strength
(MPa)
ASTM
No.
ASTM
Grade
400
400L15
t ≤ 12 400 480 A572 Gr 60
400
400L15
12
-
8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard
40/67
CAMBODIAN STANDARD CAM PW 04-102-99
BRIDGE DESIGN AMENDMENTS TO BASE DOCUMENT
MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORT July 1999 Page 37 of 39
Steel
Standard
Form Steel Grade Thickness
of material
(t), (mm)
Yield
Stress
(MPa)
Tensile
Strength
(MPa)
ASTM
No.
ASTM
Grade
250
250L0
250L15
t ≤ 12 260 410 A 36
250250L0
250L15
12 < t < 40 250 410 A 36
-
8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard
41/67
CAM PW 04-102-99 CAMBODIAN STANDARD
AMENDMENTS TO BASE DOCUMENT BRIDGE DESIGN
Page 38 of 39 July 1999 MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORT
Table 6.2.1 (Continued)
Steel
Standard
Form Steel Grade Thickness
of material
(t), (mm)
Yield
Stress
(MPa)
Tensile
Strength
(MPa)
ASTM
No.
ASTM
Grade
AS 3679 Sections & Flat
bars (cont.)
250
250L0250L15
t ≥ 40 230 410 A 36
350
350L0
350L15
t ≤ 50 340 480 A 572 Gr 50
350
350LO
350L15
50
-
8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard
42/67
CAMBODIAN STANDARD CAM PW 04-102-99
BRIDGE DESIGN AMENDMENTS TO BASE DOCUMENT
MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORT July 1999 Page 39 of 39
SECTION 7 RATING
There are no amendments to Section 7.
RAILWAY SUPPLEMENT TO SECTIONS 1-5
1.1 General Principles
1.1.1 Applicability
In the first line replace “Australia” with “Cambodia”.
-
8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard
43/67
RBHraCaNacRkkm
-
8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard
44/67
CAM PW 04-102-99 CAMBODIAN STANDARD
AMENDMENTS TO BASE DOCUMENT BRIDGE DESIGN COMMENTARY
July 1999 MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORT
BLANK
-
8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard
45/67
CAMBODIAN STANDARD CAM PW 04-102-99
BRIDGE DESIGN COMMENTARY AMENDMENTS TO BASE DOCUMENT
MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORTJuly 1999 Page 3 of 25
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION C1 - GENERAL
C1.1 General Principles. ........... ........... ......... .......... ........... .......... . ....... ....... ...... ...5
C1.1.1 Applicability ....................................................................................5
C1.3 Geometric Requirements - Carriageway Widths and Vertical Clearances. .... ... ..5C1.3.1 Bridge Carriageway Widths........... ........... .......... ....... ....... ....... ....... ...5
C1.3.2 Edge Clearances for Bridges Without Footways .......... ........... ........... .5
SECTION C2 - LOADS
C2.3 Traffic Loading ........... ........... .......... ........... ........... .......... ........ ....... ........ ......5
C2.3.3 L44 Lane Loading ........... ........... .......... .......... ........... ........... ............ 5
C2.3.4 Heavy Load Platform Loading.................... .......... ... ....... ....... ....... ......5
C2.3.5 Number of Lanes for Design and Lateral Position of Loads. .... ... .... ... ... .6
C2.3.5.2 Heavy load platform loading................... .......... .... .... ...6
C2.3.8 Fatigue Loading............ ........... ......... .......... ........... ........... ...... ...... ...6
C2.4 Dynamic Load Allowance...... ........... ........... ..... .......... ........... ........... ............ 6
C2.4.1 General...........................................................................................6
C2.4.2 Dynamic Load Allowance - T44 Truck and L 44 Lane Loadings.... .... ... ..6
C2.5 Horizontal Forces Due to Traffic ........... ........... .......... ........... ........... .......... ....7C2.5.2 Braking forces .......... ........... ........... ........... ........... .......... ........ ....... ..7
C2.5.4 Minimum Lateral Restraint Capacity - Ultimate Limit State ....... ....... ....7
C2.8 Wind Loads ................................................................................................8
C2.8.2 Basic Wind Speeds .......... ........... ........... .......... ........... ........... ....... ..8
C2.8.2.3 Terrain and structure height multipliers, and... ... .... .... ...8
C2.8.2.4 Changes in terrain category. .......... ........... ........... ..... .8
C2.9 Thermal Effects...... ........... ........... .... .......... .......... ........... . ....... ....... ....... ......8
C2.9.2 Variation in Average Bridge Temperature.......... ........... ........... ............ 8
C2.9.3 Differential Temperature........... ........... .......... ........... ........... .......... .. 10
C2.13 Earthquake Forces... ........... .......... ........ .......... .......... ........... . ............. ....... 10
C2.13.1 General.........................................................................................10
C2.13.2 Earthquake Resistant Design.......... ........... .......... . ........ ....... ....... .... 10
C2.13.4 Equivalent Quasi-Static Earthquake Forces........... ........... ........... ..... 11C2.19.3 Design Wind Speeds ..................................................................... 12
C2.19.3.2 Ultimate limit state.............. ........... ....... ...... ....... ..... 12
SECTION C3 - FOUNDATIONS .......... ........... ........... .......... ........... ........... ............ 13
SECTION C4 - BEARINGS AND DECK JOINTS
C4.3 Loads and Movements.... ........... ........... ....... .......... ........... ........... ...... ....... . 13
C4.14 Deck Joints...............................................................................................13
C4.14.7 Proprietary Deck joints.......... ........... ........... .......... ........... ........... ... 13
SECTION C5 - CONCRETE
C5.1 Scope and General .......... ........... ........... .......... .......... ........... . ............. ....... 14
C5.1.1 Scope and Application .......... ........... ........... .......... ........... ........... ... 14
C5.1.1.2 Application............................................................. 14
C5.1.5 Construction..................................................................................14
C5.2 Design Requirements and Procedures........ ........... .......... ... ........ ........ ....... .. 15
C5.2.4 Design for Serviceability ........... ........... .......... ........... .......... ........... . 15
C5.2.4.3 Cracking ................................................................ 15
C5.2 Design for Durability................. ........... .... ........... ........... .......... ...... ....... ......16
C5.4.3 Exposure Classification..................... ........... . ........... .......... ........... . 16
C5.4.10 Requirements for Cover to Reinforcing Steel and Tendons..... .... .... ... .. 17
C5.4.10.3 Cover for Corrosion Protection......... ........... ........... . .. 17
C5.6 Design Properties and Materials ........... ........... .......... ........... .......... ........... . 17
C5.6.1 Properties of Concrete............ ........... ......... .......... ........... ........... .... 17
C5.6.1.7 Shrinkage and ........... ........... .......... ............ ............ 17
-
8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard
46/67
CAM PW 04-102-99 CAMBODIAN STANDARD
AMENDMENTS TO BASE DOCUMENT BRIDGE DESIGN COMMENTARY
Page 4 of 25 July 1999 MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORT
C5.7.1.8 Creep.....................................................................17
C5.6.2 Properties of Reinforcement ........... ........... .......... ........... ........... ...... 18
C5.6.2.1 Strength .................................................................18
C5.6.3 Properties of Tendons.... ........... ........... ....... .......... ........... ........... ....18
C5.8.6 Crack Control of Beams........ ........... ........... .. .......... ........... .......... . ..18
C5.13 Stress Development and Splicing of Reinforcement and Tendons. ... .... ... .... ... .19
C5.13.1 Stress Development in Reinforcement...... .......... ........... ..... ....... ...... .19C5.13.1.2 Development length of bar in tension. ............ ............ 19
C5.16 Material Requirements .......... ........... .......... . ........... ........... .......... ...... ...... ...20
C5.16.1 Material Requirements for Concrete and Grout. .......... ........... ........... .20
C5.16.2 Material for Reinforcing Steel............ ........... ......... ....... ...... ....... .......20
C5.16.3 Material Requirements for Prestressing Ducts, Anchorages and
Tendons........................................................................................21
C5.16.3.2 Anchorages. ........... .......... ........... ....... ...... ....... .......21
C5.16.3.4 Tendons ........... ........... .......... .......... ........... ........... .21
SECTION C6 - STEEL AND COMPOSITE CONSTRUCTION
C6.2 Materials...................................................................................................21
C6.2.1 Yield Stress and Tensile Stress used in Design .......... ........... ........... 21
C6.2.1.3 Equivalent ASTM Standards .......... ........... ........... .....21
SECTION C7- RATING
C7.7 SUPPORTING INFORMATION. .......... ........... ........... .......... ........... ........... ...21
C7.7.1 Publications ..................................................................................21
C7.7.2 Other Information .......... ........... ........... .......... .......... ........... . ...... .....22
RAILWAY SUPPLEMENT TO SECTIONS C1-5
SECTION C2 - DESIGN LOADS
C2.3 Traffic Loading........... ........... .......... .......... ........... ........... ....... ....... ....... .....23
C2.3.12 300-A-12 Railway Traffic Loading. .......... ........... .......... ........ ....... ......23
APPENDIX A
NAASRA BRIDGE DESIGN SPECIFICATION 1976 - SECTION 3 - LOAD DISTRIBUTION .25
-
8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard
47/67
CAMBODIAN STANDARD CAM PW 04-102-99
BRIDGE DESIGN COMMENTARY AMENDMENTS TO BASE DOCUMENT
MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORTJuly 1999 Page 5 of 25
SECTION C1 - GENERAL
C1.1 General Principles
C1.1.1 Applicability
The range of bridges for which the ‘92 AUSTROADS Code is applicable has been
extended to include railway bridges; Clause 1.1.1 of the Railway Supplement refers.
The provisions of Clause 1.1.1. have been extended for the use by the Ministry of
Public Works and Transport and also for use by any other Authority or organisation.
C1.3 Geometric Requirements - Carriageway Widths and
Vertical Clearances.
C1.3.1 Bridge Carriageway Widths
The minimum set back distance of the kerb on bridge has been adjusted to suit the other
adopted horizontal clearances.
C1.3.2 Edge Clearances for Bridges Without Footways
The edge clearances on bridges without footways have been coordinated with values
included in the Road Design Manual.
SECTION C2 - LOADS
C2.3 Traffic Loading
C2.3.3 L44 Lane Loading
Replace the second paragraph with the following:
“L 44 has been slightly modified at the request of Cambodian Authorities.
The tandem of concentrated loads is not intended to represent heavy axles, but it is
merely an analytical device used to simulate the bending and shearing effectscaused by actual vehicle loading”.
C2.3.4 Heavy Load Platform Loading.
Replace the second paragraph with the following:
-
8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard
48/67
CAM PW 04-102-99 CAMBODIAN STANDARD
AMENDMENTS TO BASE DOCUMENT BRIDGE DESIGN COMMENTARY
Page 6 of 25 July 1999 MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORT
“The application of HLP 240 is mandatory for all bridges on Expressways,
Highways, Provincial Roads, Secondary Roads and Arterial roads. For bridges on
other roads it is not mandatory. However, the Authority should consider:“
C2.3.5 Number of Lanes for Design and Lateral Position ofLoads.
C2.3.5.2 Heavy load platform loading.
This Clause has been only amended to include the HLP 240. The Authority may specify
other special HLP loading on specially designated roads.
C2.3.8 Fatigue Loading
No additional commentary is provided.
C2.4 Dynamic Load Allowance.
C2.4.1 General
Replace the last two sentences (commencing with ‘Because…) with the following:
“The constant dynamic load allowance for T44 and L44 loadings for all span
lengths is based on the AASHTO approach and its magnitude is broadly that
corresponding to dynamic responses of short and medium span bridges. Longer
span bridges normally have low first flexural frequencies and therefore lowerdynamic load allowances may be applicable. However, with increasing length of
span the ratio of live load to dead load is decreasing and therefore the ratio of the
dynamic load allowance to the total load is also decreasing. In addition, the CBDS
also provides for alternative determination of the dynamic load allowance.”
C2.4.2 Dynamic Load Allowance - T44 Truck and L 44 LaneLoadings
The dynamic load allowance expressed as a constant percentage of the live load has been adopted for simplicity, instead of the method included in the 1992 AUSTROADS
Bridge Design Code, which requires to use an approximate value for the design and re-check the adopted value when all the information for calculation of first flexural
frequency is available.
To achieve optimum economy for major structures and/or long spans, the Authority mayapprove different values of dynamic load allowances based on tests or dynamic analysis.
-
8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard
49/67
CAMBODIAN STANDARD CAM PW 04-102-99
BRIDGE DESIGN COMMENTARY AMENDMENTS TO BASE DOCUMENT
MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORTJuly 1999 Page 7 of 25
C2.5 Horizontal Forces Due to Traffic
C2.5.2 Braking forces
The braking forces between 400 kN and 800 kN specified by the AUSTROADS
Bridge Design Code have been reduced to between 300 kN for short bridges and
600 kN for bridges 60 m and longer. Road trains with overall weight exceeding 100 t
and travelling at high speed are not considered to be applicable in foreseeable future for
Cambodian roads.
Magnitudes of the braking forces adopted for the Cambodian Bridge Design Code,
although lower than the AUSTROADS values, are similar to the braking forces (at
Ultimate Limit State) specified by the British Code and are somewhat higher,
particularly for longer bridges, than the braking forces specified at ULS by AASHTO
and Ontario Codes for up to 3 lanes travelling in the same direction.
C2.5.4 Minimum Lateral Restraint Capacity - Ultimate Limit State
Additional Commentary on the revision of the paragraph 3:
“The Australian Bridge Design Code Clause 2.5.4 specifies some minimum lateral
restraint loadings where no other loading is specified. The minimum of 500 kN is
well in excess of many of the normal loadings which would apply. In particular, in
the case of small bridges over creeks, the likely log impact loadings in the order of
100 kN are overwhelmed by this 500kN ultimate load. Where there is no vehicularaccess under the bridge, there is no good reasons for such a large load as 500 kN.
The bridge needs to be restrained to cater for unanticipated loadings such as
earthquake loadings in a nil earthquake zone, and impact from repair equipment or
other accidental minor impacts. There is no need to have a load as high as 500 kN
for this purpose.
However, a minimum 500 kN load should be retained for all cases where the deck
may be struck by road, rail or river traffic. A 3.5 metre clearance above the normal
vehicle or vessel height provides sufficient assurance to minimise the risk of impact
to a bridge from an anticipated high load.
The revision of the Clause 2.5.4 is based on the amendment document CBE 98/11
issued by the Chief Bridge Engineer of the Roads and Traffic Authority of NSW
authorised for use from 30 July, 1998.”
-
8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard
50/67
CAM PW 04-102-99 CAMBODIAN STANDARD
AMENDMENTS TO BASE DOCUMENT BRIDGE DESIGN COMMENTARY
Page 8 of 25 July 1999 MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORT
C2.8 Wind Loads
C2.8.2 Basic Wind Speeds
Replace the part of the last paragraph commencing with “The current...” with the
following:
“The appropriate Serviceability Limit State basic gust design wind speeds have
been determined from the data provided by the Department of Meteorology inPochentong, Phnom Penh, the undated French report ‘Apercu General sur le
Climat du Cambodge’ and other sources. In Cambodian conditions the
Serviceability Limit State design wind speed is uniform at 35 m/sec and the
Ultimate Limit State wind speeds vary between 45 m/sec inland and 60 m/sec in
the coastal region close to the coast. Table 2.8.2 replaces references to the
AS 1170.2.
Structural importance and shielding factors have been omitted. Use of these factorsin the AUSTROADS Bridge Design Code is reflecting the origin of these
provisions in the AS 1170.2 which is a wind loading code for all types of
structures. For bridges the relevance of these factors is not significant.”
C2.8.2.3 Terrain and structure height multipliers, and
C2.8.2.4 Changes in terrain category.
The values in these clauses have been updated in accordance with the draft of the new
edition of the AS 1170.2.
C2.9 Thermal Effects
C2.9.2 Variation in Average Bridge Temperature
For Cambodia, the Minimum, Maximum and Average Shade Air Temperatures have
been derived from the information contained in the undated French Report ‘Apercu
General sur le Climat du Cambodge’ as follows:
-
8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard
51/67
CAMBODIAN STANDARD CAM PW 04-102-99
BRIDGE DESIGN COMMENTARY AMENDMENTS TO BASE DOCUMENT
MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORTJuly 1999 Page 9 of 25
Station Av.
Annual
max.
temp.
(º C)
Average
annual
min.
temp.
(º C)
Average
annual
temp.
(º C)
Absolute
min. (º C)
Absolute
max. (ºC)
Derived
from a
period of
Climatic
Region
Stung Treng 31.6 22.6 27.1 9.5 41.4 28 years H
Siem Riap 32.0 22.7 27.4 9.5 40.3 28 years F
Battambang 32.5 23.0 27.7 10.4 41.0 20 years F
Krakor 32.2 23.1 27.7 14.6 39.5 5 years F
Kompong
Cham
(Chhnang)
32.0 23.4 27.7 12.4 39.3 26 years F
Pochentong
(Phnom
Penh)
32.2 23.7 27.8 13.3 40.5 42 years F
Svay Rieng 32.5 23.4 27.9 12.2 38.7 24 years F
Kampot 31.2 23.6 27.4 14.7 37.2 18 years C
Sihanoukville 30.3 25.2 27.8 20.5 34.4 4 years C
The altitudes of all stations but Stung Treng is
-
8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard
52/67
CAM PW 04-102-99 CAMBODIAN STANDARD
AMENDMENTS TO BASE DOCUMENT BRIDGE DESIGN COMMENTARY
Page 10 of 25 July 1999 MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORT
This information indicates remarkable uniformity of average annual temperatures across
the country. The most appropriate temperature for the determination of nominal
dimensions dependant on temperatures (ie for setting of deck openings at deck
expansion joints, etc.) would appear to be 27 ºC.
The stations are located in all three climatic zones (Coastal, Flat Lands, High Lands),however, there is only one station located in the High Land Climatic region. The
elevation of this station is only 54 m and it is therefore not representative for the
mountainous north eastern region of Cambodia. No climatic information appears to be
available for this region and the recommended temperature reductions related to high
elevations are based on information from other tropical regions.
C2.9.3 Differential Temperature
Values of T have been revised to reflect the climatic conditions prevailing in Cambodia,
namely, higher uniformity of temperatures than in Australia.
In the absence of information on temperature ranges in higher elevations in Cambodia,
the value of T has been determined from information from other tropical regions.
C2.13 Earthquake Forces
C2.13.1 General
Replace the text with the following:
“Earthquake severity at different locations is now defined by an acceleration
coefficient, a, the value of which for Cambodia has been determined by the
Seismological Centre of the Australian Geological Survey Organisation inCanberra, on the basis of the World Earthquake Database. This indicates that
there is not a single epicentre in Cambodia. Figure C2.13.1, a copy of the map of
regional seismicity covering Cambodia and a large area around Cambodia, shows
the regional tectonics.
The ISC World Seismograph station list shows that there are no seismographs inCambodia. The records also show that there have been no magnitude 6+
earthquakes since 1960 and no magnitude 5+ earthquakes since 1980. The nearest
large earthquake was more than 300 km from the Cambodian border and the plate
boundaries at least 650 km away.”
C2.13.2 Earthquake Resistant Design
Delete second paragraph and replace with the following:
“In a general situation, design for earthquake resistance must comprise anassessment of the seismicity of the site, an estimation of the induced seismic load
-
8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard
53/67
CAMBODIAN STANDARD CAM PW 04-102-99
BRIDGE DESIGN COMMENTARY AMENDMENTS TO BASE DOCUMENT
MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORTJuly 1999 Page 11 of 25
and an evaluation of the structural system characteristics and the dynamic structural
response. The subject is discussed in Newmark and Rosenbleuth (1971).
Evaluation of the dynamic response due to seismic loading of a specified
acceleration spectrum can be performed with the aid of a number of readily
available computer programs.”
F igur e C2.13.1 Map of Regional Seismicity
C2.13.4 Equivalent Quasi-Static Earthquake Forces.
Delete fourth paragraph and replace with the following:
“The seismicity Factor, α , has been related to the acceleration coefficient, a.”
Delete sixth paragraph and replace with the following:
-
8/9/2019 Cambodia Bridge Design Standard
54/67
CAM PW 04-102-99 CAMBODIAN STANDARD
AMENDMENTS TO BASE DOCUMENT BRIDGE DESIGN COMMENTARY
Page 12 of 25 July 1999 MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANS