DEBATE Open Access Gut health : a new objective in medicine?
CALRG Open Access Debate
-
Upload
robert-farrow -
Category
Education
-
view
50 -
download
0
Transcript of CALRG Open Access Debate
![Page 1: CALRG Open Access Debate](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/587e1a4c1a28abbc2e8b5f3d/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Open Access Debate17th November 2016
Dr. Rob Farrow
![Page 2: CALRG Open Access Debate](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/587e1a4c1a28abbc2e8b5f3d/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Arguing against the motion: 'This house believes that the majority of academic work carried out by the Learning Teaching and Innovation portfolio should be published in openly accessible journals.’
![Page 3: CALRG Open Access Debate](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/587e1a4c1a28abbc2e8b5f3d/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Why shouldn’t you publish open access?
![Page 4: CALRG Open Access Debate](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/587e1a4c1a28abbc2e8b5f3d/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Argument from injustice
![Page 5: CALRG Open Access Debate](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/587e1a4c1a28abbc2e8b5f3d/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Devaluing the research process
![Page 6: CALRG Open Access Debate](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/587e1a4c1a28abbc2e8b5f3d/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Argument from sustainability
![Page 7: CALRG Open Access Debate](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/587e1a4c1a28abbc2e8b5f3d/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Argument from academic prestige
![Page 8: CALRG Open Access Debate](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/587e1a4c1a28abbc2e8b5f3d/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Argument from quality
![Page 9: CALRG Open Access Debate](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/587e1a4c1a28abbc2e8b5f3d/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Dissemination paradox
![Page 10: CALRG Open Access Debate](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/587e1a4c1a28abbc2e8b5f3d/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
If you should publish open access, should you do it “mostly”?
![Page 11: CALRG Open Access Debate](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/587e1a4c1a28abbc2e8b5f3d/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
'This house believes that the majority of academic work carried out by the Learning Teaching and Innovation portfolio should be published in openly accessible journals.’
![Page 12: CALRG Open Access Debate](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/587e1a4c1a28abbc2e8b5f3d/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Argument from inconsistency
![Page 13: CALRG Open Access Debate](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/587e1a4c1a28abbc2e8b5f3d/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Argument from imperfect implementation
![Page 14: CALRG Open Access Debate](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/587e1a4c1a28abbc2e8b5f3d/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Three possibilities:
1) The case for OA publication is not made, therefore reject the motion
2) The case for OA is made, but the motion is insufficient, therefore reject the motion
3) The motion is too vague, therefore reject the motion
![Page 15: CALRG Open Access Debate](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/587e1a4c1a28abbc2e8b5f3d/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Has the case for OA been made?
No Reject the motion
YesMotion is
insufficient: reject
Too vague Reject the motion
![Page 16: CALRG Open Access Debate](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062822/587e1a4c1a28abbc2e8b5f3d/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Image Credits