California Transportation CommissionCalifornia Transportation CommissionSeptember 19, 2007September 19, 2007Rocklin, CARocklin, CA

KEEPING

PLACER

MOVING

KEEPING

PLACER

MOVINGPCTPA, Caltrans, and CTCPCTPA, Caltrans, and CTC

2

A Brief Background On A Brief Background On Placer CountyPlacer County►Sacramento Valley to TahoeSacramento Valley to Tahoe

►Fast growing countyFast growing county

►PCTPA PCTPA MembersMembers►City of AuburnCity of Auburn►City of ColfaxCity of Colfax►City of LincolnCity of Lincoln►Town of LoomisTown of Loomis►City of RocklinCity of Rocklin►City of RosevilleCity of Roseville►Placer CountyPlacer County

3

PUTTING MONEY PUTTING MONEY ON THE GROUNDON THE GROUND

4

►25% RTIP25% RTIP►75% Developer impact 75% Developer impact

feesfees

I-80 / Douglas Blvd I-80 / Douglas Blvd Interchange Interchange (Completed)(Completed)

5

I-80 / Douglas Blvd I-80 / Douglas Blvd Interchange Interchange (Completed)(Completed)

►Unique Design Unique Design with tunnel and with tunnel and flyoverflyover

►Removes about Removes about 15,000 cars per 15,000 cars per day from busy day from busy Sunrise Blvd-Sunrise Blvd-Douglas Blvd Douglas Blvd intersection intersection

6I-80 Bottleneck in I-80 Bottleneck in RosevilleRoseville(Phase 1)(Phase 1)

►First of 4 total First of 4 total phasesphases

►Auxiliary lane Auxiliary lane between between Auburn Blvd Auburn Blvd and and Douglas BlvdDouglas Blvd

7I-80 Bottleneck in I-80 Bottleneck in RosevilleRoseville(Phase 1)(Phase 1)

►Opened 3 Opened 3 months ahead months ahead of scheduleof schedule

8

I-80 / Sierra College Blvd I-80 / Sierra College Blvd InterchangeInterchange►Currently Currently

under early under early constructionconstruction

9

►AB 3090 cash AB 3090 cash reimbursement reimbursement = advance = advance constructionconstruction

I-80 / Sierra College Blvd I-80 / Sierra College Blvd InterchangeInterchange

10

Capitol Corridor Rail Capitol Corridor Rail ServiceService►23% increase in Placer ridership between 2001 and 2006

►16% increase in overall system ridership for same period

11

NEAR TERM HORIZONNEAR TERM HORIZON

12

I-80 Bottleneck in I-80 Bottleneck in RosevilleRoseville(Phase 2)(Phase 2)►Carpool and auxiliary lanesCarpool and auxiliary lanes

► Placer/Sacramento County line to Eureka RdPlacer/Sacramento County line to Eureka Rd

►$80 million project $80 million project ► includes $18 million CMIA fundingincludes $18 million CMIA funding

►Allocation vote on CTC Allocation vote on CTC January 2008 agendaJanuary 2008 agenda

►Construction starts Spring Construction starts Spring 20082008

13

►$34 million $34 million project – project – CMIA / ITIPCMIA / ITIP

►Allocation Allocation vote January vote January 20092009

►Construction Construction starts Spring starts Spring 20092009

I-80 Bottleneck in I-80 Bottleneck in RosevilleRoseville(Phase 3A)(Phase 3A)

14

Funding Sources

Fed4%

Local12%

RTIP26%

CMIA24%

ITIP34%

►Largest transportation Largest transportation project ever in Placerproject ever in Placer

►30 years in the 30 years in the makingmaking

►Local – Caltrans – Local – Caltrans – CTC partnershipCTC partnership

SR 65 Lincoln BypassSR 65 Lincoln Bypass(Phase 1)(Phase 1)

15

SR 65 Lincoln BypassSR 65 Lincoln Bypass(Phase 1)(Phase 1)

►Design-sequencing Design-sequencing speeds constructionspeeds construction

►Allocation vote on Allocation vote on December 2007 CTC December 2007 CTC agendaagenda

16

KEEPING PLACER MOVING KEEPING PLACER MOVING FOR THE LONG RUNFOR THE LONG RUN

17

South Placer Regional South Placer Regional Transportation Authority Transportation Authority (SPRTA)(SPRTA)

►Regional transportation impact fee Regional transportation impact fee program formed in 2002program formed in 2002

►Currently, 65% of total funds go toward Currently, 65% of total funds go toward State highwaysState highways

18

Placer Transportation Placer Transportation Expenditure PlanExpenditure Plan►Includes:Includes:►Future State/Fed fundingFuture State/Fed funding►Additional Developer Impact FeesAdditional Developer Impact Fees►Transportation Sales TaxTransportation Sales Tax

Local Funds15%

Developer Impact Fees

33%

State & Federal Funds27%

Sales Tax25%

19

►22% to state highways 22% to state highways ►18% to regional roads18% to regional roads►Includes Placer ParkwayIncludes Placer Parkway

►30% to transit, rail, 30% to transit, rail, bicycle/pedestrian bicycle/pedestrian projectsprojects

►30% to local 30% to local transportation projects, transportation projects, including road including road maintenancemaintenance

Regional Roads

18%Transit, Rail, Bike/Ped

30%

State Highways

22%Local Projects

30%

Placer Transportation Placer Transportation Expenditure PlanExpenditure Plan

20

Solutions for Our FutureSolutions for Our Future

KEEPING PLACER MOVINGKEEPING PLACER MOVING