CALIFORNIA Regional Haze SIP Development Progress Report
description
Transcript of CALIFORNIA Regional Haze SIP Development Progress Report
CALIFORNIA Regional Haze SIP
Development
Progress Report
IWG MeetingPortland, Oregon
August 29-31, 2006
HIGHLIGHTS
• Federal Land Managers
• IMPROVE
• BART
• Interstate Consultation
• Interstate Transport
• Reasonable Progress
FEDERAL LAND MANAGERS
• Intra-State Consultation
• Bi-Annual Meetings
• Regional Haze Teach-In
IMPROVE MONITORING
• Match Air Basins
• Similar Elevations
• Reasonable Distance
• Future Growth and Land Use
• Research Value
• Rank Importance
BART-eligible FACILITIES
• Possibly 30 facilities outside the SJV and SC
• Sixteen BART categories
• RACT and rule stringency
• Q/D elimination, then Subject-to-BART modeling
• Title V permits
• TPY reductions minimal
FAR NORTHERN CALIFORNIA
REDWOODS Coastal Avg. Worst 18.45 dv
TRINITY Remote Forest Coast Range (lee) Avg. Worst 16.32 dv
LAVA BEDS Inland Plain Avg. Worst 15.05 dv
• Species Analysis– Haze Drivers– Seasonality– Concentration– Extinction
• Geography– Terrain– Meteorology– Regional vs. Local– Proximity to eight Class
1 Areas
concentration extinction
LASSEN VOLCANIC Western Base of Mountain Avg. Worst 14.15 dv
FAR NORTHERN ISSUES
• Surrounding Land Use - Natural
- Anthropogenic
- Transport (Pacific, OR, WA, NV, Asia)
•Long-Term Strategy– Smoke Management– On/Off Road Mobile
• Species Reductions–Nitrates, sulfates, woodsmoke
- BART
- SB 656
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
• Species Analysis– Nitrates, Sulfates, OC, Coarse Mass, EC
• Attribution– Mobile Sources primarily; Boundary Transport
• Strategies (NAAQS non-attainment)– Diesel Risk Reduction, Goods Movement, BACM
GLIDE PATH BENCHMARKS
Worst Haze
Worst Haze
10-year 2018 Per Cent Change
Complete Years of
Site Name Class I Area(s) Natural II (dv)
Baseline (dv)
Glide Slope
BENCHMARK
by 2018 Data
NORTHERN CALIFORNIAREDW1 Redwood Redwood National Park 14.03 18.45 0.07 17.42 5.6% 5TRIN1 Trinity Marble Mountain Wilderness
Yolla Bolly-Middle Eel Wilderness8.25 16.32 0.13 14.43 11.5% 3
LABE1 Lava Beds Lava Beds National Monument South Warner Wilderness
7.95 15.05 0.12 13.39 11.0% 4
LAVO1 Lassen Volcanic
Lassen Volcanic National Park Caribou Wilderness Thousand Lakes Wilderness
7.38 14.15 0.11 12.57 11.2% 5
SIERRA CALIFORNIABLIS1 Bliss Desolation Wilderness
Mokelumne Wilderness6.19 12.63 0.11 11.13 11.9% 4
HOOV1 Hoover Hoover Wilderness 8.04 12.87 0.08 11.74 8.8% 3YOSE1 Yosemite Yosemite National Park
Emigrant Wilderness7.72 17.63 0.17 15.32 13.1% 5
KAIS1 Kaiser Ansel Adams Wilderness Kaiser Wilderness John Muir Wilderness
7.26 14.75 0.12 13.01 11.9% 2
SEQU1 Sequoia Sequoia National Park Kings Canyon National Park
7.56 24.62 0.28 20.64 16.2% 3
DOME1 Dome Lands Dome Lands Wilderness 7.53 19.43 0.20 16.65 14.3% 4COASTAL CALIFORNIAREDW1 Redwood Redwood National Park 14.03 18.45 0.07 17.42 5.6% 5PORE1 Point Reyes Point Reyes National Seashore 15.88 22.81 0.12 21.19 7.1% 3PINN1 Pinnacles PinnaclesWilderness
Ventana Wilderness8.05 18.46 0.17 16.03 13.2% 4
RAFA1 San Rafael San Rafael 7.83 18.86 0.18 16.28 13.6% 2SAGA1 San Gabriel San Gabriel Wilderness
Cucamonga Wilderness7.13 19.94 0.21 16.95 15.0% 3
AGTI1 Agua Tibia Agua Tibia 7.70 23.50 0.26 19.81 15.7% 4SOUTHERN CALIFORNIASAGA1 San Gabriel San Gabriel Wilderness
Cucamonga Wilderness7.13 19.94 0.21 16.95 15.0% 3
SAGO1 San Gorgonio San Gorgonio Wildrness San Jacinto Wilderness
7.36 22.17 0.25 18.72 15.6% 4
AGTI1 Agua Tibia Agua Tibia 7.70 23.50 0.26 19.81 15.7% 4JOSH1 Joshua Tree Joshua Tree National Park 7.25 19.62 0.21 16.73 14.7% 4
AVERAGE 8.42 18.31 0.16 16.00 12.4% 3.6RANGE lowest 6.19 12.63 0.07 11.13 5.59% 2.00
to highest 15.88 24.62 0.28 21.19 16.16% 5.00
REGIONAL HAZE BENCHMARKS for California Class 1 Areas • Lowest Hurdles
– coast at sea level
– lee of Sierra
• Highest Hurdles– southern Sierra
– southernmost C1As
• Regional Response to Reductions
• Gap Analysis
VISIBILITY IMPROVEMENT
• San Gorgonio GAP Analysis– Achieve 70% of 2018
deciview benchmark – 45% reduction in
nitrate extinction– 11% reduction in OMC;
37% reduction in EC– slight increase in
sulfate, coarse mass, and fine soil extinction
• Overall Trend is Improvement
WHO IMPACTS WHOM
• Uncontrollable Boundary Sources
• BART Sources
• Large Nearby Sources
• Caveats for Attribution Modeling Results
• Relative Percentage for Consultation>50% 25-50% <25%
Phase 1 Report TSSA: Combined Nitrate & Sulfate
REASONABLE PROGRESS
• Justify Reasonable Progress Goal using WRAP data analyses– Wildfires– Transport– Mobile sources, transportation corridors– Population growth and land use– Nearby stationary source facility
• Long Term Strategy– Explaining California SIP Commitments
– Don’t shoot the messenger!
CALIFORNIA Class 1 Areas