CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Status Report Demand Responsive Building Program William J. Keese...

13
CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Status Report Demand Responsive Building Program William J. Keese California Energy Commission March 30, 2001

Transcript of CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Status Report Demand Responsive Building Program William J. Keese...

Page 1: CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Status Report Demand Responsive Building Program William J. Keese California Energy Commission March 30, 2001.

CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION

Status ReportDemand Responsive

Building Program

William J. KeeseCalifornia Energy Commission

March 30, 2001

Page 2: CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Status Report Demand Responsive Building Program William J. Keese California Energy Commission March 30, 2001.

CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION

CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION

Statewide Peak Demand Load Resource Balance at 7% Operating Reserve

35000

40000

45000

50000

55000

60000

65000

2000 2001 2002 2003

Interruptible

Imports*

Firm Trans.

Powerplants

Existing *

Imp orts* ad dition al a mou nts are a va ila ble in n omina l an d 1 :5 sc en arios , bu t no t n ec es sa rily in 1:40 s ce na rio

Ex is ting Re so urc es *Th is n um be r is de r iv ed from b as e ins ta lled re so urc es , le ss o utag es o r4 3,8 56 - 2,57 2 = 41 ,1 04

Nomi nal Peak Dem and

1 in 5 year Dem and

1 in 40 year Dem and

Resources

Page 3: CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Status Report Demand Responsive Building Program William J. Keese California Energy Commission March 30, 2001.

CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION

CALIFORNIA SUMMER 2001Forecasted Peak Demand - Resource

Balance(in megawatts)

Temperature Probability 1-in-10

Peak Demand + 7% Reserve 61,125 Incl. Anticipated growth

Existing Resources:* Existing ISO Control Area Resources 45,025* Net Imports ISO Control Area 4,834 Includes Pacific Northwest* LADWP Control Area Resources 8,198* Imperial Irrigation District 875* Far North - Eastern Sierras 277

Total Existing Resources 59,209

Expected Outages -3,050* *Historic Average. Current outages are running 250% above average.

Resources Available to Meet Load -4,966

Additional Resources with On-Line Potential for July 2001:

* Approved CEC Projects 1,262* SMUD McLellan CT Upgrade 22* ISO Peaking Facilities 1,133* Renewable Energy Projects 80* Rerate/Restart of Existing Thermal and Renewable Projects 1,244

Potential Resources Existing Projects 3,741

New Generation with On-Line Potential for July 2001:

Emergency Peaking Facilities 1,000CEC Approval Pending 45 (United Golden Gate)LADWP Harbor-Valley 267New Renewables/Distrib. Gen. ?

Total New Generation Identified 1,312

TOTAL GENERATION ADDITIONS SUMMER 2001 5,053

Source: CA Energy Commission and Electricity Oversight Board February 8,2001

Page 4: CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Status Report Demand Responsive Building Program William J. Keese California Energy Commission March 30, 2001.

CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION

3/21/01

Project Process Capacity Project Type Location(MW)

Projects Approved Decision On-line*Sutter Construction 500 Green Field Sutter Co. 4/99 7/01Los Medanos Construction 559 Brown Field Contra Costa 8/99 7/01La Paloma Construction 1,048 Green Field Kern Co. 10/99 12/01-3/02Delta Construction 880 Brown Field Contra Costa 2/00 4/02Moss Landing Construction 1,060 Expansion Monterey Co. 10/00 6/02High Desert Financing 720 Brown Field San Bernardino 5/00 7/03Sunrise Construction 320 Green Field Kern Co. 12/00 8/01Elk Hills Financing 500 Brown Field Kern Co. 12/00 3/03Pastoria Financing 750 Green Field Kern Co. 12/00 1/03United Golden Gate Financing 51 Brown Field San Mateo Co. 2/01 8/01Midway-Sunset Financing 500 Expansion Kern Co. 3/01 3/03Mountainview Financing 1,056 Expansion San Bernardino 3/01 12/02Blythe Financing 520 Green Field Riverside Co. 3/01 3/03

Total 8,464

Projects in Review Decision On-line*Huntington Beach 2-mo. AFC 450 Repower Orange Co. 4/01 7/01Hanford 6-mo. SPPE 99 Green Field Kings Co. 4/01 4/03Metcalf 12-mo. AFC 600 Green Field Santa Clara Co. 7/01 7/03Three Mountain 12-mo. AFC 500 Brown Field Shasta Co. 5/01 5/03Otay Mesa 12-mo. AFC 510 Green Field San Diego Co. 4/01 4/03Contra Costa 12-mo. AFC 530 Expansion Contra Costa 7/01 7/03Neuva Azalea 12-mo. AFC 550 Brown Field Los Angeles Co. suspended suspendedPotrero 12-mo. AFC 540 Expansion San Francisco 11/01 11/03Morro Bay 12-mo. AFC 1,200 Replacement San Luis Obispo 1/02 1/04El Segundo Repower 12-mo. AFC 630 Replacement Los Angeles Co. 2/02 2/04Rio Linda/Elverta 12-mo. AFC 560 Green Field Sacramento Co. 5/02 5/04Pastoria II 6-mo. AFC 250 Green Field Kern Co. 10/01 4/04Golden Gate 6-mo AFC 570 Brown Field San Mateo Co. 11/01 11/03

Total 6,989

Projects Expected (Publicly Announced) Filing On-line*Kern Co. Restart 2-mo. AFC 160 Repower Kern Co. 4/01 10/01Woodland II SPPE 80 Brown Field Stanislaus Co 4/01 10/03Colusa Comb. Cycle 12-mo. AFC 600 Green Field Colusa County 5/01 7/04Roseville 12-mo. AFC 750 Green Field Placer Co. 8/01 8/04East Altamont 12-mo. AFC 1,100 Green Field Alameda Co. 3/01 5/04Russell City 12-mo. AFC 600 Brown Field Hayward 6/01 6/04Antelope Valley 12-mo. AFC 1,000 Green Field Kern Co. 8/01 10/04Salton Sea Geo. 6-mo. AFC 300 Green Field Imperial Co. 6/01 12/03Carson Expansion 6-mo. AFC 130 Expansion Los Angeles Co. 6/01 12/03Magnolia 6-mo. AFC 310 Replacement Los Angeles Co. 5/01 11/03SMUD Comb. Cycle 12-mo. AFC 1,000 Green Field Sacramento Co. 8/01 10/04South City 12-mo. AFC 550 Green Field San Mateo Co. 10/01 11/04Long Beach 12-mo. AFC 500 Green Field Los Angeles Co. 2/02 3/05Redondo Beach 12-mo. AFC 1,000 Replacement Los Angeles Co. 3/02 4/05

Total 8,080

Dates

CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION - ENERGY FACILITY SITING STATUS

Page 5: CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Status Report Demand Responsive Building Program William J. Keese California Energy Commission March 30, 2001.

CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION

Project Process Capacity Project Type Location(MW)

Projects Approved

Total 0

Projects in ReviewWildflower Larkspur 21-day 90 Green Field San Diego Co.Wildflower Indigo 21-day 135 Green Field Riverside Co.Ramco Chula Vista 21-day 57 Brown Field San Diego Co.Alliance Century 21-day 40 Brown Field San BernardinoAlliance Drews 21-day 40 Brown Field San Bernardino

Total 362

Projects Expected (Publicly Announced)

Total 0

Projects Expected (Not Publicly Announced)Peaker 21-day 100 Brown Field Fresno Co.Peaker 21-day 100 Brown Field Contra Costa Co.Peaker 21-day 100 Brown Field Santa Clara Co.Peaker 21-day 50 Brown Field Monterey Co.Peaker 21-day 50 Brown Field Sutter Co.Peaker 21-day 120 Brown Field Santa Clara Co.Peaker 21-day 90 Brown Field San BernardinoPeaker 21-day 50 Brown Field Kings Co.Peaker 21-day 50 Brown Field Contra Costa Co.Peaker 21-day 50 Brown Field KernPeaker 21-day 50 Brown Field Los Angeles Co.Peaker 21-day 50 Brown Field Los Angeles Co.Peaker 21-day 100 Brown Field Los Angeles Co.

Total by 9/01 960Peaker 4-mo. AFC 176 Brown Field Santa Clara Co.Peaker 4-mo. AFC 85 Brown Field Kings Co.Peaker 4-mo. AFC 100 Brown Field Contra Costa Co.Peaker 4-mo. AFC 50 Brown Field Kings Co.Peaker 4-mo. AFC 50 Green Field Contra Costa Co.Peaker 4-mo. AFC 120 Green Field Kern Co.Peaker 4-mo. AFC 50 Brown Field Solano Co.

CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION - EMERGENCY PEAKER PROJECT STATUS

Page 6: CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Status Report Demand Responsive Building Program William J. Keese California Energy Commission March 30, 2001.

CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION

What is a Demand Responsive Building System?

• EMS or building manager who responds to

price or emergency signals by reducing

building loads ( HVAC & lighting)

• Building manager takes advantage of

opportunities to sell load reductions to

aggregators, UDC’s, or the ISO

Page 7: CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Status Report Demand Responsive Building Program William J. Keese California Energy Commission March 30, 2001.

CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION

CEC Program Objectives• Empower customers to save money and reduce

peak reliability problems next summer

• Encourage customers to install control systems

that can respond to price or “emergency”

signals and communicate load reductions

achieved to ISO

• Install systems capable of saving 50 MW in

response to signals by June 1, 2001

Page 8: CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Status Report Demand Responsive Building Program William J. Keese California Energy Commission March 30, 2001.

CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION

CEC Program Approach

• Provide metering equipment and assistance to

enable customers to participate in ISO/utility

programs using recruitment contractors• Provide direct grants to larger customers who

have the engineering knowledge to install

own systems

Page 9: CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Status Report Demand Responsive Building Program William J. Keese California Energy Commission March 30, 2001.

CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION

Target Market MW

TargetContract Amount $/kw

30 large/medium Smud Commercial customers 10 $802,500 $80.25

20 to 40 Roseville medium commercial customers 10 $956,000 $95.60200 Enron commercial customers 7.5 $1,500,000 $200.00

250 large and medium commercial customers from PG&E 35 $1,411,000 $40.31100 medium to large commercial customers in SDGE area 5 $422,915 $84.58

5 to 8 facilities in the Star Hotel Chain 2 $309,950 $154.98

250 SDG&E medium and large commercial 3.125 $1,060,505 $339.36100 sites from City of San Jose, Association of Bay Area governments (ABAG), Los Angele county and the state Department of General Services 12 $1,400,000 $116.67

Contracts Awarded

Page 10: CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Status Report Demand Responsive Building Program William J. Keese California Energy Commission March 30, 2001.

CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION

Grants AwardedGrantee Bldg types MW Grant cost

CiscoCisco office buildings 1.3 $40,460

Alamedacounty buildings 1.2 $260,964

Hewlett Packard

HP office and warehouse buildings 1.8 $445,764

Foothill De Anza

University Facilities 1.3 $283,140

Page 11: CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Status Report Demand Responsive Building Program William J. Keese California Energy Commission March 30, 2001.

CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION

Why Install Demand Responsive Systems?

• Cheaper than building emergency backup

($50-250/kw installed)

• Markets do not work without demand

responsiveness to respond to high prices

• Need to monitor and control energy costs and

to automate EMS responses

Page 12: CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Status Report Demand Responsive Building Program William J. Keese California Energy Commission March 30, 2001.

CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION

New Funding Possibilities

• SB 5x has $70 million in funds for new

demand responsiveness programs

• AB 970 programs were over-subscribed by

$5 million so new funds will augment

existing applicants first

Page 13: CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Status Report Demand Responsive Building Program William J. Keese California Energy Commission March 30, 2001.

CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION

For More information

• Review program guidelines at www.energy.ca.gov/efficiency/ab970

• Contact Mike Messenger at 916-654-4774

• Contact your local utility for information on

prices and terms offered for delivering load

reductions