Calculators Not! Why Not?

14
Calculators Not! Why Not? Jan Martin Assessment Director, SD DOE SDCTM Feb.8, 2014

description

Calculators Not! Why Not?. Jan Martin Assessment Director, SD DOE. SDCTM Feb.8, 2014. Grade 3- 5 Math Content. Number and Operations – Base 10 Grade 3 : Using place value and properties of operations to add and subtract whole numbers Grade 4: Multiplying and dividing whole numbers - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Calculators Not! Why Not?

Page 1: Calculators Not! Why Not?

Calculators Not! Why Not?Jan Martin

Assessment Director, SD DOE

SDCTMFeb.8, 2014

Page 2: Calculators Not! Why Not?

Grade 3- 5 Math Content

Number and Operations – Base 10

• Grade 3: Using place value and properties of operations to add and subtract whole numbers

• Grade 4: Multiplying and dividing whole numbers

• Grade 5: Solving problems with decimals using the four operations

Page 3: Calculators Not! Why Not?

Grade 3-5 Math Content

Operations and Algebraic Thinking

• Grade 3: Understanding meaning of multiplication and division

• Grade 4: Applying understanding

• Grade 5: Writing and interpreting numerical expressions

Page 4: Calculators Not! Why Not?

Grade 3 – 5 Math Content

Number and Operations – Fractions

• Grade 3: Understanding of fractions as numbers

• Grade 4: Understand fraction equivalence

and operations with fractions

• Grade 5: Solving problems involving the four operations

Page 5: Calculators Not! Why Not?

Grade 3-5 Math Content

Measurement and Data

• Grade 3: Measuring time, liquid volumes, and masses of objects and solving simple one-step word problems

• Grade 4: Solving problems involving measurement, representing and interpreting data, and understanding angles

• Grade 5: Understanding volume and solving problems that involve estimating and measuring volume

Page 6: Calculators Not! Why Not?

Grade 3 – 5 Math Content

Geometry

• Grade 3: Understanding that shapes in different categories may share attributes and recognizing quadrilaterals

• Grade 4: Classifying shapes based on properties

• Grade 5: Graphing points on the coordinate plane and understanding that attributes belonging to a category of two-dimensional shapes also belong to all subcategories of that category

Page 7: Calculators Not! Why Not?

Claim 2 – Problem Solving

• Selected Response, Constructed Response, Extended Response, and Technology-Enhanced items that focus on problem solving

• Items and tasks require students to construct their own pathway to the solution

• Relevant verbs include: – understand, solve, apply, describe, illustrate,

interpret, and analyze

Page 8: Calculators Not! Why Not?

Claim 3 - Communicating Reasoning

• Constructed Response, Extended Response, and Technology-Enhanced items and tasks that focus on mathematical reasoning

• Relevant verbs include:– understand, explain, justify, prove, derive,

assess, illustrate, and analyze

Page 9: Calculators Not! Why Not?

Claim 4 – Modeling and Data Analysis

• Performance Tasks and collections of Extended Response items

• Real world problems

• Draw upon knowledge and skills articulated in the progression of standards up to the grade being assessed

• Relevant verbs include: – model, construct, compare, investigate, build, interpret, estimate,

analyze, summarize, represent, solve, evaluate, extend, and apply

Page 10: Calculators Not! Why Not?

ITEM WRITING GUIDELINES

Page 11: Calculators Not! Why Not?

Selected Response Items

• From the General Guidelines for Developing SR Items • Items should be appropriate for students in terms of

grade-level difficulty, cognitive complexity, and reading level.1

• Items are expected to include mathematical concepts detailed in the CCSSM of lower grades.

• At grades 3–5, all items should be written so they can be answered without using a calculator

• Items should provide clear and complete instructions to students.

• Each item should be written to clearly elicit the desired evidence of a student’s KSA.

Page 12: Calculators Not! Why Not?

CONSTRUCTED RESPONSE ITEMS

• From the General Guidelines for Developing CR and ER Items/Tasks

• Items/tasks should be appropriate for students in terms of grade-level difficulty, cognitive complexity, and reading level.

• Items/tasks are expected to include mathematical concepts detailed in the CCSS of lower grades.

• At grades 3–5, all items should be written so they can be answered without using a calculator.

• Items/tasks should provide clear and complete instructions to students.

Page 13: Calculators Not! Why Not?

Computational Complexity of Mathematics Items and Tasks

• In general, items/tasks developed to assess student understanding of core concepts and procedures in mathematics will draw upon grade-level standards to ensure student mastery of this content.

• Grade-level standards are implicitly included in the assessment targets of Claim 1 for grades 3–5. The assessment targets for Claim 1 correspond directly to the cluster headings contained in the CCSSM, and the technical demand of these Claim 1 items can be consistent with the grade level being assessed. However, when writing more complex tasks (such as those associated with Claims 3 and 4), the computational demand should be lowered and should typically be met by content that was first taught in earlier grades.

Page 14: Calculators Not! Why Not?

Questions?