c,3 roved by · 2019. 1. 23. · CALENDA"R ITEM NO. C.0:3 (CONT'D) 4. An EIR was prepared and...

17
•• .,, 'MINUTE ITEM· c,3 Th1s Calendar Item No. -- was a'!f roved MtnutG No! . commlss,on by a vte: to· o at lta ..J,tJ. . " 5 - meeting •• A 7S s 39 APPLICANT.: AREA, TYPE LAND LMiD USE: - ITEM c 03 GENERAL PERMIT San Diego Unified Port Attn: =Mr. Don Nay, Port Di'rect:or P .o. Bc)x· 488 "" : · · San 10/07/88' 24076 PRC 7252: Townsend AND LOCATION: A 24.48-icre parce1 of and .located in San Diego Bay, ·City of San Diego, · San Diego county. Install ?nd 46 anchorage and boundary markers and buoys. TERMS OF PROPOSED PERMIT: Initl:al period: 2S years beginning July' L CONSIOERAT!ON: 1989. ::. The public use and benefit: with the State the any time to set a monetary rental if Commission finds such icti6n to 'be in the best FOR CONSIDeRATION; Pursuant to 2 Cal. A.dm. ·code 2003. APPLICANT -iE -hf CONDITIONS, FEES -AND EXPENSES: Filing fee and' processing co-sts have been STATUTORY AND- -OTHER REFERENCES: A. Div. 6, l ind 2: Diu. 13. -:-1- " I' I _ .NO,\;t

Transcript of c,3 roved by · 2019. 1. 23. · CALENDA"R ITEM NO. C.0:3 (CONT'D) 4. An EIR was prepared and...

Page 1: c,3 roved by · 2019. 1. 23. · CALENDA"R ITEM NO. C.0:3 (CONT'D) 4. An EIR was prepared and adopted for this· project. by San Diego Unified Port District. The State Lands- Commission's

••

.,,

'MINUTE ITEM· c,3 Th1s Calendar Item No. -­was a'!f roved ~ MtnutG l~m No! bythe~Lan~ . commlss,on by a vte: to· o at lta ..J,tJ. -· . " 5 -meeting ••

A 7S

s 39

APPLICANT.:

AREA, TYPE LAND

LMiD USE:

- CAL~NOAR ITEM

c 03

GENERAL PERMIT

San Diego Unified Port Pi~~ric~. Attn: =Mr. Don Nay, Port Di'rect:or P .o. Bc)x· 488 "" : ·~..- · · San Die~o~ C~lifornia 9211~-0400

10/07/88' w· 24076 PRC 7252: Townsend

AND LOCATION: A 24.48-icre parce1 of tid~ and ~ubmerged ·1a~d, .located in San Diego Bay, ·City of San Diego, · San Diego county.

Install ?nd ~~ihtain 46 anchorage and boundary markers and single-po~nt.anchor buoys.

TERMS OF PROPOSED PERMIT: Initl:al period: 2S years beginning July' L

CONSIOERAT!ON:

1989. ::.

The public use and benefit: with the State raservi~g the ~ight- ~t any time to set a monetary rental if t~e Commission finds such icti6n to 'be in the Sta~~)s best int~rest.

BASI~ FOR CONSIDeRATION; Pursuant to 2 Cal. A.dm. ·code 2003.

APPLICANT ~TATUS: -A~p_1-i:£ant -iE gr-an~g~' -hf ·!!f!l~_mL

PRER~QUISITE CONDITIONS, FEES -AND EXPENSES: Filing fee and' processing co-sts have been receiue~i

STATUTORY AND- -OTHER REFERENCES: A. P.~.c.·: Div. 6, Par~s l ind 2: Diu. 13.

-:-1-

" I'

I

_ ~.t .NO,\;t ~·,\Ge

Page 2: c,3 roved by · 2019. 1. 23. · CALENDA"R ITEM NO. C.0:3 (CONT'D) 4. An EIR was prepared and adopted for this· project. by San Diego Unified Port District. The State Lands- Commission's

AB 884:

CALENDAR-ITEM NO~ 03 (CONT'Dl ·i,f

'· B-. Cal. Adm. Code: Title 2, Div, 3; ·ri'i:ie. 14·,

Div. ,6.

01/.25/89.

OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION·: 1. The San Diego Uni'fi~d Port Distr•i.ct

.has surmi~ted an applicatiqn to lease 24.48 acres of State-o~ned lands located in San Dieg~·Bjy, adjacent to l~nds legislatiuely g~~hted to ~he Po~t in ·th• City of San Diego. Forty-six single P,oint mooring ,buoys are proposed' to be install~~ ~hd• made auailable on a ~e~mit ba~is for use by ~mall ~raft. The proposed lea~e area will be identified as the Shelter Island Roadstead Anchorage. ·

The Shelter IslNhd Roadstead Anchorage is a supplement to the comprehensive Small Craft

-Mooring arid Anchorage. Management 'Plan (Baywide Plan) ~dbptid by th~ P6rt District for all of San Diego Ba~·· The Baj currently has a scatter1ng of unauthorized •. boat mooring ~reas, where health ·and safety c~nditions cahnot bw monitored. The ouer"=-all Baywide .Plan will bring the boating ~o~muriit~ ~o selected anchorage and -mooring, faci~ftie~. thereby.aiding wanagement. .It is anticipated th~t the Baywide Plan ·fuill be plac~d on th~_-October 1988 agenda for consideration by ~he California Coastal Comli:iission ..

2. The annual rent~i value of the site is ~stimated t9 be $3,036.

3. This a~tiv~ty involve~ lands identified as ·possessin.9 si·gn~ficant ·environmental ·Value-$ pursuant to P.R.C. 6370, et seq .. Ba_sed -upon' the staff· 1_s con,sultation with t~e persons no~inat~ng such lands and. through the CEQA.reu~iw pro~esj, it is the stafr•s op~nion that the -project, as proposed, is consistent.wifh its ·use'classification.

\ ·,

Page 3: c,3 roved by · 2019. 1. 23. · CALENDA"R ITEM NO. C.0:3 (CONT'D) 4. An EIR was prepared and adopted for this· project. by San Diego Unified Port District. The State Lands- Commission's

••

CALENDA"R ITEM NO. C.0:3 (CONT'D)

4. An EIR was prepared and adopted for this· project. by San Diego Unified Port District. The State Lands- Commission's staff has rev±~wed sue~ document a~d h~ve found that there were no significant enuironmental effects which involve the part of the project that tho Commission wili be considering for approval.

APPROVALS OBT~INEO~ Un~ted ~tates coast Guard.

FURTHER APPROVALS REQUIRED: California Coastal Commission

EXf:!IBITS: ·."'"

United States Army Corps of Engineers.

A. Land' Description. B. Location Map. c. Project Report Summary. D. Board of Pert Comniis.sioners ~_eso;tution

No. 88211 -~ EIR. E~ B~ard:of Port Commissioners Reiolution

~.io. 88,212 - Master ·Plan. Amendment .

IT IS RECOMi~~ND'ED THAT THE ·COMMISSION:

·i. :f;INO- THA f AN EIR WAS .PREPARED AND ADOPTED FOR THIS PROJECT BY THE SAN DIEGO UNIFIED PORT DIS~RICT AND THAT THE COMMISSION, HAS R~VIEWED AND-CONSIDERED THE INFOR~~TIQN CONTAINED THERE.UL. .

2. AD(l'PT THE FirJDING·s·. MADE FOR THIS· PRO~ECT _BY THE SAN 0 DIEGO. UNIFIED PORT DISTRICT ·PURSUANT TO SECTION 15091 OF "THE STATE EIR GUIDELINES·.-~·-·

3. DETERMINE tHAT THE PROJECT, AS APPROVED~ WILL NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT EFFECT O~ THE ENVIRONMENT.

4. AUTHORIZE ISSUANCE TO SAN DIEGO UNIFIED PORT DISTRICT OF A 25-YEAR GENERAL PE~MIT - PUBLIC AGENCY USE BEGINNIN~ "JULY 1, 1989; IN CO~SIDERATION QF THE PUBLIC USE AND BENEF,IT, WITH THE STATE Rt::SERVING THE RIGHT AT ANY TIME TO SET A "MONETARY RENTAL IF THE ·COMMISSION FINDS.SUCH ACTION TO BE IN J;HE STATE 1 S BEST INTEREST;- FOR INSTALLATION AND MAINiENANCE OF 46 ANCHORAGE BOUNDARY MARKERS AND SINGLE-POINT ANCHOR BUO~S ON-T~E LAN~~ESCRIBED ON EXHIBIT '11 A11 AT:n\CHED AND av" REF'ERENCE ~ADE ~ 'PART HEREOF •

'6

-3-. ' • ·-~":"'- •'-===-''.".'.'""~. ~1~4 ........... ,

.p.,\l b~_.;: - \

·.~:...:...._:.<i_f. __ -_? __ .9, ~}=\~

Page 4: c,3 roved by · 2019. 1. 23. · CALENDA"R ITEM NO. C.0:3 (CONT'D) 4. An EIR was prepared and adopted for this· project. by San Diego Unified Port District. The State Lands- Commission's

/

F.XHIBIT. "A"

LAND·DESCRIPTION w 24076

A parcel of submerged land in the bed ..of Sa~ Die90 Bay, lo...cated­in the City of San riie99, San Dl_ego Co~nty, ~State ·n.f California·, more particularly described as. follows:

Commencing at Harbor Line Station No. 429 on the Combined:u.s. Piarhead and Bulkhead Line, as said that portion of Harbor Lines vera-.atablished for the Bay of S~n Diego, and deli~eo!lted on Kap entitlad "Harbor LU~a, San Diego· Bay, California, File No. '(D~Oo Seriea) 425.1," approved by the Secretary of the Army, August 18, 1965, a~d filed 1~ th•-9ff1cc of the Dbtrict ~~ii~eer, Loa Angeles, California, 1aid Station No. 429 having California Cooruinate System ~one VI ·grid coordinates North 1~8;328.75, East ·1,698,267.20; ·thence· along said Combi~ed U. s. P:lerhead and ~u_lk!i~~.d Line ngrth 45• 04' 02" eatit a· distance of 689.26 feet to a point of ~'(t'teraec_!::lon w~th the 111ost westGlrly limits of an·easem~nt granted by the St.ate of California to the-City of San Diego;. Public Agency ·Permit-~No. 4716.9,"''filed 21 December 1972 in the ·Offi~e of San Diego County Recorder, File/Page N~. 339S78, said point al•o being the TRUE POIWf OF BEGINNING; thence con~inu:lng along said C~mbined·u. s. Pierhead and Bulkhead Line ~o~th 45• 04' 02" ea1t a distance of 3,693.85

••

feet ti»Station No. 1:31; thence north 38° 39' ·4·5u·eaa1: a diatanca of 1199.99 fact to Station No. 433; thence north 8° 09' 34" west a -distance of 206 .• 16 f~et to Station No. '435; thence leaving said Combined U. S. P.J.erheacf and •·· Bulkhead -Line south 53• 09' 35" east.-& distance of 683.35 feet to a point ori a curve co~cave' to the northwest -having. a radius of·-~90.00 feet, the center. of vhich bears north 41• 01' 00' weat, •aid point also beir.g on the veaterly limit line oi· thl!. !bove described City of San Diego. ea11ement; .thence. so~thwe~terly along· 9Qid 990.00 foot rgdius.curve and said weat~rly ~imit line. through a central angle of o• '!8' 33" an. ~!C dia~an<:;e of' 5.34 feet to a point which 'bears so~th 40• 42' 21 11

• eaat ·from the c_enter of said curve;_ " thence continuing along· said westerly liait line south 49.• U' 33" ~e~t ·~ distance of 5, 116~.12 feet to tho. TRU& 'OI~ ·OF BE~INNIN<;~ containing 1,066,337 square feet or 24.48 acrea of water covered area •

..

REVI~D AUCµST 2 • 198& :BY -BlU 1

... ~

Page 5: c,3 roved by · 2019. 1. 23. · CALENDA"R ITEM NO. C.0:3 (CONT'D) 4. An EIR was prepared and adopted for this· project. by San Diego Unified Port District. The State Lands- Commission's

o· F

.'~wauoPl:iM \ " · .. I " . . ' " ...

' .... '·

··-T/t LINA

EXHIBIT "B~' ff 2'4016

Page 6: c,3 roved by · 2019. 1. 23. · CALENDA"R ITEM NO. C.0:3 (CONT'D) 4. An EIR was prepared and adopted for this· project. by San Diego Unified Port District. The State Lands- Commission's

' \. ~XH!BiT· .!!e:!­

EIR S~MMARY

,, . I • SU K,)i· A D:·Y

1. The Fn>Ject

The proposed Project consists of ari amendm-e~t to tl,t~ .P~r~ _Manter ·P~n to

establish the Shelter lslan~ Roadstead Anchorage and, subsequently, to tnatall

about 50 single point moorl!IBS ln the ·area ·bavw~rd of Sh~lter lsianc:t. The

Roadstead ts designed to reorganize ~he existing uncontroited cncborln!J o~ recreational craft so es to ·avoid buoy anebor· weighU. ·being· .placed ln sunken . .... - '

cable or .plpellne e·asements ~r in martne resourc_e ar~as; avoit''.h_avtng ·moored

ve.ssels ln n~vtgatlon corridors or -publl~ .f ishlng areas; ~!l~ preve'nt vessei ancbot

dragging_ into such areas.

The proposed ·Roadst:~d mQOrlngs w9uld -be .p~ced tn navigable w_aters from

about 20 ·to 40 f~et deei; and extend over submerged . lands granteddn trust to

the San Diego. Unlfled Port· Dlatrlct, and over submerged· lands_ under the . - .

Jurlsdlctlon of the State Lands Coinmisslon.which would»!.ie leased;bv the·Dlstr!ct~ ' - ..... • • .-~ » :- ~ , " ......

2. AltematlV~

. -- ..... ,... -~ .. .

- - • w ,.... •••

·---~::..i: "_ .. ~ .. ·--.-. • = • ~.

Pzoject alternatives. include lrlcreaalng denaltle1. in eXladng, deslgna~ed ~oodng: areas mid the creation ot new rrioe>rlngs-or anchorage• l~·cu~rently undeaignated

areas around th~ Bay. Por example, converting Anchorage A-1 in the Shelter-· ._ .;.. ~ > -

·lalanci- Yacht''Basin t~ fo*e-and.;aft moorlftga ~outd-t&~~1u capaclty. Slmlliirly,

currently undeslgnatet! ·areas .(~ch as Bmory Baa!n and Convalr· Lag<?Oill have

~n con;IJl!eted· ·earJ~el. but· ·!eJ~ctc~ f~r e1'vlr9nment~,-. -engineer~ng, aa_feey

or other. r~aons •

Page 7: c,3 roved by · 2019. 1. 23. · CALENDA"R ITEM NO. C.0:3 (CONT'D) 4. An EIR was prepared and adopted for this· project. by San Diego Unified Port District. The State Lands- Commission's

... ...... ..

B. PROJECT IMPACTS

Recen.tly, numerous· yess\els ll.@.~.e ~hosen .tq ~n~Jloi' ~~ th~ water area bayward - .

ot SJ}elter· isiand. See .Fls\ite li.;2. This· hae ies!Jlte~ in ·confl~c~s betwee?l

~ompetlrig uses' ot the area, lnc~udmg the, operatlon1 of' the pubUc\t~11h{n1. pier

and .adja~en.t fisheries enhancement structure•; t~e pub!~~ ·l'!Oat launching r~mp,

and lt1 ·boat navigation corridor and pubUc parilng iota; ,the publtc beach area;

the eubmer!f~d .ca~te~ and. pipeline. areasJ areas desl~ated, ~~or ~~mbed

enhancement P.rojects; open· Bay waters containing ~ar~n~,resources arid ?i~l~~tl;·

and the nav~atlonal operatto?s of t~e adjacent main harbor entranc;e channel

<~-Pigure ll-3).

·ne ·Shelter Island Roadstead was _prop~sed ~~d desl~ed. ~o ellmlnate stgnt!l~~

public Sa(ety .issues and land/water ~se conflicts that h~ve .arisen from th~ -

existing un~ontioll~d anchc?.rt11g ot vessels baywiiid of' Shelter. I~l~nct~

Ne;> slgnltlcatit, adv~rse Impacts were ldentltl~d "due ~o lmpte.inent.~tion of' the

Project. Cufrent adverse impacts -.du~~ could- b~. e1llminateci' ~y- lmple_m~-~~tng'

the Project are:

• ~Jl~!natlon of publl~.sat~ty Issues re?at~g",to. th~ uncontrolled anc:ho~age . . - --

ot' veiisets in navlgatlOn corridors used.by the Coast Guard, Harbor-Po!lce . ' .

. and com~erclal vessels; ancho~lng l_11 deep.waters (40 feet or more) that

coutd·be used tor emergenc;y mane~ve:rlng by deep~rat't·mllltary or

comf!1.erclal vessels; disruption of ·unl!~rwater ca~~~s'qr pipei(f•es~wlth-

on-board anchors; anci overJ;o~r<.f dumplng of- veuel wastes.

• .EUmlnatlon c5t land and water,. use. confllcts vis-a-vis anc~orlng ne~r.:

public fishing and ~each areas, and vi.-a.;vis.t1aftl~, cir~ulatlon"a~d pa.fldng.de~anci~:~~;uttlng _from the.unco~trQfied and unplanned to.r J,'

~ :-veuel.fleet.

I-2

\

\)

;I~

•• ·t-i·,:

Page 8: c,3 roved by · 2019. 1. 23. · CALENDA"R ITEM NO. C.0:3 (CONT'D) 4. An EIR was prepared and adopted for this· project. by San Diego Unified Port District. The State Lands- Commission's

I I I I I

. .

• Bll~lriatJon of' anc:hortni In m'arlne reacurce areas, .Uch u fl1hef1

· enhalicezrfe~~ areas, ~lgria bedi, an4 elambed en~ncement are21.

I.· ICUba•aaaW..ed-biologtcat· ~ecpnnalaance-1urveyc.,VU cendt.tcted;ln

-the.i "~Jl>C?'~~-.~c:;horage are,as (A-la, A-lb end A~IC). Eetgrua be? arc .well developed al~ng t~e shoreJme (mf!xlmum cover, -s feet to

~io feet ~LLW)'from southwest:~! A-la to within about,2]0 feet of

the-boei launch. AdcUttonal h~d• 9'1'ere found to occur ln;the ahallow - ,, ... . - - .._.. . '

water c~rt the nortJiea;t. end- of Shetter I1l_and. No eelgrul resources

occur wlthln areas de1lg'llated tor the .proposed anchnrages• or dlnghy

landing ~l.\~Ulty, '°d-no adverae lmpac;s ~~f!·antlclpated due to ;he

lmplementa~lon and operation or the prOJ>~ed anchorages.

o Eelgrass exposed"durlng low sprJng '.tide (0 teet-~MLLW,or lo~er).~fthe

SO~thwest end Of the public beach fs Vtdn_e1abJe tO, 'da111agei by dlng~y

mo~ements:to and 'froiit the proposed anchora~es. With enf'orceme~t

of existing and prop()sed regulations (and 1lgn1 on the 'beach), dlngh_y

mov.,ments,to and\frorii the propo~~-d landing and storage are~ at·th~ .

~~itheruit ~nd of the beach-w.lJl;serve to protect the exlsdng.eelgran~

e The-~~uced number of anchored-craft wlth1eff'ectlve enforcement

• of current ~~8'!1la.tloni.(prohlbltlng dls~iUirge ot untre~ted wastewa.ter _ - ' -

and ove_rboard waste diipoSal)'ahould :lead to'.further water quallty - . .... . '

Improvements In the BS:Y·

Implementation,. of the Project alo~e will not ensure· thee· ellQ1lnatlon of all' f?f

theae exlltlng cond!tton,. Anchorage -feSUlatlona will have to -be 'promulgated

and ~nf orced f o-r the Project benefits to be full~· eft~,:tlv~.

r~~ ~ ====:=;-~ .. . l e·.• .1:r•.Uii'7.' ___ j. 9 - ... ___ , ' _2.928 1._. 1 •• , ~- •v·~ ·• I"'•'. - . -· ·"· -·· : ... -.. , :.-..----------

Page 9: c,3 roved by · 2019. 1. 23. · CALENDA"R ITEM NO. C.0:3 (CONT'D) 4. An EIR was prepared and adopted for this· project. by San Diego Unified Port District. The State Lands- Commission's

. ( ,

c. CU~ULAUVB J.KPACTS/OROWTH JNDUCBMBNT'

The gro_wth Inducing lmpacu aaaoclated with Jmplementatlon .of the pfc>posed I

Shelter .~lsnd Ro~dstead Anchorage ln\•otv~: ihe s:ddltlon ot .~bOu~ SO ·mo9~liig oppo~ltlea to the baywlde mooring and anchorage'!nventory.

The ~umuiatlve Impacts o! Implementing the·=P.ioJect wtll 'be b~?th po1ltlve and

adverse. The postttve Impact' ,~,ictude all those -m~_don~d ab.9ve reiat~cf._ to

tmprovlng _pubUc safety; resolving current land and water. use contllc:U, and

Increasing th~ Bay's m·oorlng and anchorage Inventory. They are .posltl~ when

viewed trom the itan!Jpolnt ot managing. tiie·Bay-and It• umiteei r~·~~r~e.~

The prmclpal:cumulattve Impact involves ~he Project's· Incremental contribution

to reaching t~e Bay's finite capaclty tor wet storage of ve11el1., When ,tht.

ultimate Capacity la· reached, and a1 &!\Chorage ·regulatl9n1 are entorc~d, "°'ter1

wlll be forced Into designated anchorage•; Into -using ·dry·,storage op~lons; Into

prtvat€ commercial marinas or yacht clubal::-:or tnto wet storage topportunltl~• outalde'San Dlego Bay.

D. WTIGATiON KBASURBS

Implementation of the"Projec~ was !iOt, found to-result In any ,'slgnlflcant.a~verse

lmp&cts, therotore no mitigation meaatuea are elth~r propose4;~·r required. .,,

·:. -~2o .. :_f' ,\ilNi:~. :.·.~:= 2 9 2 9 t· ---------·--~ ~ . _.......:..=.!

-·:r) \~111 ...

,1

=I-. '

>,_.

Page 10: c,3 roved by · 2019. 1. 23. · CALENDA"R ITEM NO. C.0:3 (CONT'D) 4. An EIR was prepared and adopted for this· project. by San Diego Unified Port District. The State Lands- Commission's

EXHIBIT "D"

Ro:·Shtlter tsl&nd Roadstea~ Pla!f Amtndment ·)

Final ·Suppltf!tnt.Envirot'llltntal I!lpact Re~or.t,.~nd' » . ) ·Ft11ng of Hotfce.of Otttl'l!lfnatton )

...;....-----------------------~---------> RESOLUTION 88-:211

WHEREAS. the S~n !>iego Unified. Po.rt District '(Dfs,..trict) has .adopted a

Po:Ot Master Plan whict: has b'Hn ·c~rtified by the C~lifor11f1.Coast1l Coni,ission·

pursuant to· the CaJiforn,,• .Coastal Act: and

WHEREAS, th1,,0htrfct:' prepare~ ind_ the Board -of :Port Comtistoners ieoard)

ctrtiffed a Final Environment1l lrili?~ct Report on tht Por~Ha;tor Plan whtc~ is

on file wtth·tht Office of th• Dt~tr.ict Cler~ as Oocuiltnt Ho. ·12590; &Rd ·

WHEREAS, th• District tub11qu1ntly·adcpttd ~-~id• Seall Craft·Moort~g . , - . . --and Anc~_oragt Plan-:(,8aywfd1 Plan) to au;Mtnt th• Port Masur ·Pl~n by _addhtg

sptcfftctty ~o th• mooring and·!ftchorag1 designations contained tn·th• Mastor'

'Plan and to destgn1te arus wt.thin th• bay for:·inoor:tng and anchoras;t purposes; • ' ' ~ .. r>.

and

-~HEREAS, tht Of strict prepared and th~ Board c1rttfi~d l final Sub1equ1~t

EnviroMttl')tal l111P1ct,R1port \ln the h)'wtd1"~lan1 wfijch ,ta on f.~11 in t~t Offic_1

of the·D,stri~t Cltrk as Ooc'ililent No. 17292; and

WHEREAS, th•. Of strict hu '"°" p_repartd an,'ADtndMnt ·to the Port Hasttr ' . .

Plan to suppl ... nt th1.1dopt1d.&.ywid1 Pl~. by eltab11~hing tho Sh1lt1r Island . -~ . Ro1d~t11d Anchorage (Project)', &rid to .Carry out certain wate_r area

f11Prov ... nt1, principally the 1nstallation:of mooring buoys; and

WHEREAS, tht ~oard held 4 noticed public hearf~g on July 5, ·1988 on tht

propoud Shtlttr lllan'd Ro1d1t0ad P.lan IMndM!'t &nd its 1ilp191f.tation;' a~4.­

WH£REAS, at th• Board!s d1rection, staff prepared the Final ·Suppl ... nt EIR

which includes ·copf 11 of all'.written coi;JHntsrr~ce,ved and -th• :o~·strict''s.

response to co!ililtnts, fil~d- tw the ~ffict ~f;,tht-01str.1ctcCltrk, ·~s Doc~~t

Ho.22492; 111.d

WHEREAS, the- Final Suppl~nt EIR. h bifare ~-• Boird~. aft4 Dtstrtct. ~~ff·

~11 concluded that it 'l:adtquatt ind cOlli:tlott an~ ,.ccmlndi~c•rt.tft~~tton,

••

Page 11: c,3 roved by · 2019. 1. 23. · CALENDA"R ITEM NO. C.0:3 (CONT'D) 4. An EIR was prepared and adopted for this· project. by San Diego Unified Port District. The State Lands- Commission's

88-211

NOW, THEREFORE,

BE IT P.~SOLVED by ~he Board"-o,f Port C~issioriers of the San· Diego ·Unif,ed·

Port District, as follows:

1. The Board hereby certifies that the Final~Sup9le1111nt EIR concerning

tho Project, ~n file tn-the Office of thecOistrict·c1erk·as Document No22482. . ~ " . his been comp1~ted in compliance with CEQA, the State,CEQA,Guidelines, and

' . .~ ,

District .Procedures for Emi1ro-.nta1 Revt.W, and,~that the Board and otht'i' ·~~ -.. - ~

'District offtciafa: hJ!Ying final authority ~ver approV&l ,of the P~joct have

rov,jewed and constderud th• tnformat1on 1~ tlil Final Suppl_e1111nt EI~~

2. The B~ard ft,ds that t~• contents of tht Final SuP,pl1111tnt EIR are an

exercise of t~e fnd1pgnd1nt jL-d~nt and 1n1'y11i of the-Ot~trtct,and art

sufficient, accurate, and'.lobj!tctive.

3. Bastd on th~ 1nf~r:_mat1on contained tn the Final 'Supplttnent EIR, the,

B'ard makes tht following findings.and dettnntnittoris: -a. that. the Projec~ .Qf th1s:,Supp!~nt .EIQ consists of an /Qendment to

~. Port Masttr Plan to tu~;:il~nt th1.-1~opt1d Ba)'wide Small ~raft

Mooring &nd Anchor1g1.Pl1n 1 to e:tablish the Shtltsr Island Roadstaad -- . ~- ..,_ ;.

~chorage, !rid to i111Pl-.nt th1· w&t•~ 1re1 tinprov ... nts;·

b.Ythat thi·current condt~ton of'·tht.Shelttr l~land Roadstea~ area with

··tiaplfazard &nd\ortng ltd to the Board's poltcy direction. t~<...H~lhh

',:." . 1110orhi?-b®ys, and ·11tOortn9 ngulaticns und!r Port adlftintstratton Hd

control;

c. th1,t·the·purpo11 of. tfi•·?lan Allen~~ is t~ provide-for~~·

~ubslquent i111i;tltcitntaticn and-regulatioP-of the.~h•1t•r Isl1nd~ . Roadstead An~~~r•Q• a~ its 1nvtron1; to ~d~ dlout 50 additional

mooring opportuntttesi to the bay•s,&nchoragt inventor~; and to resolve ,.. ' . '" -.

the ccrrent land and "~~·r us• conflicts which havt artson froe tht

uncontrolled anchoragi of .vessels"in the Projtct area;

d. that the-Project r1inpl11111niatton 1J••tll organize the anc:horagt ar11; - ~ ~~ , . "·.,_ ~

ptralit unrestricted navt;atto~~l a~c1a1 to tht public boat launch

~;. ~nhanct public: .!a~ety tn th• b.tach aroa; •nsure full u;•- of ~~·

1r11·1r~und ~~·public fi~ing pier; ;prevent pot~ntial d_..~1-to'the

----· . ~2-'2;. :f.~ .:..,),. _,.,,,...:-:: I --·-··-·· _J~~ ~ 1 .::. .. '. l

--------- __ .!

.. ~ .

Page 12: c,3 roved by · 2019. 1. 23. · CALENDA"R ITEM NO. C.0:3 (CONT'D) 4. An EIR was prepared and adopted for this· project. by San Diego Unified Port District. The State Lands- Commission's

-88-2 \ l --------

88-li'i

submerg~~ pipeline and fish enha~cement structur~s f~c. dropped arid

dr~ggcd anchor:; allow tii1 tinr1strict1d'~s1 of th~~d••P draft'fai~1

idjacent to the ~in ship channel for-navfgationll,purpose'; ·~~~nee

n_avigitional saf!~l'' in the Project arta o:r provfdfng· 1 fghted ·.anchorage

boundary ~rker buoys: ~~d.prottct~ths bay's-natural rasourcl~ in the

Project vicinit1;

•· tha~ upon ·Proj~i:~;iisf1..,env~1on, thl'nueber of designated, public

small craft mooring an,d ancnoragt. opportunities wfthiri San .Otego·:Say • wi J1 be Increased ~to 1ccCQ110dnt1 approxiutlly 9!i0" vessels; and,.

~-.-.. -. ~ ~

,further that £pproximite!y 6~e~Ci:":~dft1cnaJ borthing opp_o,r.t'~•nf.tf(s :a~e-

available ,wt,thfn privatt nr.inas and 'y~tfit cl,ubi;

·f. that the regulattons to ust th~-110ortng1 would provtde·for:·th,. •.

1sslgnm1nt of a mooriftg space by P'l'llt~ for, i~sptcfftt~ tiliNI;

verif1cation--of vea~el ~ership ·~nd 'r!J11iStr1tion; 1nsp1~·1_0it-f~r

seaworth1n111, 'Hnitary ,fact.Ht1ts, .\llutt conta1n1rs~ fi.~•. ~.&faty, ··-.:•

1nd·h11lth related t~ut~nt; thit tht v11i11 can·navtcat•w::P.i~nt ~f

fttA and ~1po1tt1: and oth•~ provisions 11:d!ttrain1d by the Soar,d:

froa ti'" to tfM;

Ii'.!· -that dt=rtng tht C~nstl'Uctton :of tht water .area flfiill'OVeitantS, the-thin ,I

current u~ers would need to,vacatt th~ sfte;t..Porarfly, for poa~tbl~

up to three llOl1~h1;

h. that th• nlll!btr of vtistls us-tn9,.._th1. Proj1c; area ts highly va·rtable

and that othtr ·areas .. of th•· ·a.y/4t't avaflablt for anchoring; and -.. further that, assuming tha~all ve~sels could cntll?l! with all of the

f • •

1nchor1;1 use Plnt1~:crtte~t a tncludfng .. ~_urrt,nt, regf strition IJ.ld

-~•mtorthfn111, all ~' the v111tl1 cc~l~ ~~ 1ccoanodat1d tn tht

~urrently defaign~ttd a_:id propos~d anch!)rages. and ~·prfng spaces;

1. th~t the .suppl-nt EIR'has bltn-co_l!Pltttd in ccmpHanc1·wfth CEQA~and

Stato CEQA G~fdtlines; .

j •. that the Boar~ of Por1; Comfssforiers has r1vt1Wtd,and consfdtred the -·'.

1nforiut1on C0!'1.t1fn1d in tht··Ffnal .Sup~!,flMnt .EIR fncludhi~ let~1r.s of ' -C081!tnt ·and Dfstrfct. resp9n:e; j=--- ~-.':.. _-2 .. 3·-':~-1

.. :. •.•• Ja.11\.;. ' •. J:: ...... - . .;;...;...: \,;_'.\"~ ... ~;.~ -4~9~~2~:.~1 -- - ~

Page 13: c,3 roved by · 2019. 1. 23. · CALENDA"R ITEM NO. C.0:3 (CONT'D) 4. An EIR was prepared and adopted for this· project. by San Diego Unified Port District. The State Lands- Commission's

88-2 ll

.k. that the Board is making, findings and c,onclustcms ~htrefrOill.

~- The Board finds that the env1ro.~nta1 CO!\Stquen~ts of Miendfog:

the Port Master Pl1n to establi~h th1·~h1Jt1f .Isl1n~ Roadsttad ~nchoragt, and

the·subsequtnt tmplet:ltn~atio~ of ~e,1~r.hor~g1·have b~1n evaluited in,the Fin~l Suppleinent EtR and that oo further conditione ~r mitigation 1111sur1s S-1ycnd·

F " "' - , ~ '

those of the Pr~jcct are requi~ed. And·furthef1 that the~Final Supplllitnt,EIR .., # - ".' - ..,

adequately· addresses the relevarit Water/Land Use, Water Qu~Hty, Traffic

Circulation• P,ublic ·s~fe~y. Marine P,,~sources, &l'ld Visual 9ual,ty iH\lH and

t~at .tho Board':finds ·no· adverse IS!p~cts not mittgit~d 'by the Project as

proposed. Tht·Bo~r~ c~~cludes that thtr·ftnal Suppl~tnt E!R s~rvts i~ the C£QA

docU11ent for .the Port Ma:St11r PlM'Alntridllent 1nd,.fo~1' th• i.P18tnutfon of th• ' ' '' ,. - 4 ' ~

Project. s. T~• Board finus·and concludes thst.~• Sh1ltlr :~sland·Roadstead Plan·

Am•ndment tndi th•r•forl, its i111PlMMtntat;101, wo.ulci not h~v·~· significant

~ffect (s,ub~'tantial adv1rse[,chan511) on th• en'ihor"!l!nt. 6~ Th• Bo1rd-furthtr'finds.and·concludes-jhet tht·cond!ti~n• recOtMl(l~ded

iri th• Final Sup?l1Dtnt EIR, which ~!•'htr~by ~d1~proj1~t rlquir ... nts~ art

suff1c11nt~1nd re~sonablc-~o r1du$=i·:proj1ct•rtlattd· lf!1ct1 on the .tnviroiWnt

to insignificM1t, 1cc1~t~l1·l1v111. 7. 1\lis action,by tht Board cor.1;1~t1s final 'nv1rol'lltln~1 .approval· -

only. Th• Port Otrector·or hts authort~~ re~rtsin~t1vt is authorized and~-. . -

dir1ct1d·to file, in accordance with law, a:Hotic• of 01t1riaination with the ,. . - ~ ..

Office of !>1ann1ng and .Rest~rch, and ~ith' thl.-~n Diego C°-unty C14!i".k.·

ADOPTED this _ 19th diy of ....;._~J~u.._h.__. --•· 1988.

Prcse~ted ~y: DON L. NAY, Port Dtrett9r

-~.·

Approil~d: JOSEPH Q;. PATELLQ, Port0

Attofn1y

~··

Page 14: c,3 roved by · 2019. 1. 23. · CALENDA"R ITEM NO. C.0:3 (CONT'D) 4. An EIR was prepared and adopted for this· project. by San Diego Unified Port District. The State Lands- Commission's

San Diego Unlf ied Po:t Distric....t

Off ice of the Clerk

·CDTIPICA.~\li;>OP VD'rB - ~ '\ ' -

Passe4 and adopted by the Bo~r9;-~f Pori1 Comm~~s~oners of the San Diego

Unified· Port ·?~~trict on Ju"~! 19. _....;.1988-, ·by the :oilow!ng_ '1:0te: - , \ ,' - ·- - c· •

• Co~issioner~ ·N&Y.•- Ab~ent 0 ~.bstai~ed · ·

Raymc,nd w. Burk

w. paniel La~san

Robert-Penner

Milford ••· i'ortvooc1

pelton c. -aeopel~•

Willlaa Be: '.~Cit

Louis M. 1folf•he!aer

(Beal)

Resolution N~er: or

O~d;nan~• Nu~eri

--.:,

_ __!_

x ---

of ·th• Bocrd .of Port Comaa1esionera ,_ ,, ' .

-:- ~

.Byi_..-Z>J--'-"~~,· i...Jie-==M..---=-_:M_.· · ..... ~--..-.-~-~· ---, ~ · Deputy. Cler"~ ·

88-211

·-• _,

Adoptech __ ...._ __ __.. ...... .,..01 ... 1;,..;1.,9.-l_a_a ._. _ ._.

Page 15: c,3 roved by · 2019. 1. 23. · CALENDA"R ITEM NO. C.0:3 (CONT'D) 4. An EIR was prepared and adopted for this· project. by San Diego Unified Port District. The State Lands- Commission's

...

..

I ..

Re AH~dm9nt of Port DiStrict ] .;-+ -----l I

,UUt"'9~ ·Plan - Sbelter Ia land ) -::..~ ......_

l Roadst•ad Uoorins .. ~ . . J

l =-.

W&DEAS, tb•·San-,Dioco Uaified Port D1~tr1ct (Port D1•tr1ct)

bae an adapt~d Port µ&&tor Plan which bu 'been cer_~~fied· by tbe

·California, Coastal ~oanisaio~; and

\iBEREAS, said Plan wt.•. pr.par~d, ~~optod an~ certif~'•<fJpur-

suant tc- ·tbc Por_t· Distr1¢t Act; ~be Ca~ife>rai:i Coaatal Act and

other appli~able laws; a~d WHEREAS, a proposed Plr.n·amondment for the S~ilter·l•l&nd

Roadatea~ lioorin1 ba•· been prepared ·~nd':proceHed_; and; .•

WHEREAS;. i P1~al Supp~~••Dt 1nvi~onmental 'Impact Rg~ort pur-

suant to tbe ~al1iorto1& BnvirotUDantaLQ\lality ~ct, s~ate CEQA . -

.GuidelinaQ, and Po~t D!strict·proceduree rel~tive to said amend~ ment fias:boen prepar~d ~nd certified and· its contents considered,

NOW, TBBBUORB, BB I~ aESOLV!D by t~e·Bo~r~ of. ~ort comin~~~ioner• of tbe·

San .DieiO Unified Po~t D'i~1=:det, as follows!

~bat tbe .Mast~i: ~lan of. tne ~ort District is ame~ded by, ·in-

co~poratiDI tbe~ei? the Wa~to~ Plan-amenclmen~. on file ln; th•

office of the ~ort Distr~ct·~Cler~ &• Document No. 22411

pertain1Di to aaid -!3he~ ter 181.and noad•tead Moorinl.

n·· ,, ... ,_,.,., r.-1 ·u N (,,.)

:t:? --

.,,

, .. . I ... , . . . • -, . i . -. .

.. '·. . . . . .' · .. ~" . . • . . . i : . . ·-:

., • • • i'F ..... I , , .. ,+ . . ... ... ,,.• I' I ,::1

.. " • ~ • -~- • .,,. ~ • I . '~. • .

Page 16: c,3 roved by · 2019. 1. 23. · CALENDA"R ITEM NO. C.0:3 (CONT'D) 4. An EIR was prepared and adopted for this· project. by San Diego Unified Port District. The State Lands- Commission's

... . .

Bl ·IT'Fm\THER RESO~VED t~at tbe U.uster·Plan,~ndmeBt abgll

be ·~umsittdd to the C~lifornia Ccasi:al"'-Comis~1on for cert1Uca-

t1o.'1.

ADOPTED this '19 t b-Jil.1 of __ ... J._u...,li:o.;Y'-----

.prament~d By: DON L. NAY, Port Dir~ctor

Apprt;ived:

!l1f 1/19/88

• ,JOsEPH D. PATiilo, P~rt -~ttorney

d{?,1u"'

1988'>

,,

•. ~ .... ;\ . ' ' -

Page 17: c,3 roved by · 2019. 1. 23. · CALENDA"R ITEM NO. C.0:3 (CONT'D) 4. An EIR was prepared and adopted for this· project. by San Diego Unified Port District. The State Lands- Commission's

• •

szin Diego unified Port. -I>ist·rict r - ,, -

Offic~ of the 1Clerk

C!lft'UICA'lIO~.OP VOTB

·- . ~ . . -

Passed and adopted .by the Board of·- Port commissioriera0 of the San Diego_

~nifie4, Port ~istrict <>n· --~u .... 1...,yJ--<11..,,.·2..a.. __ 1908~ ·by th_e. fol·lowi~g. votes

Co~'-niss ioner•

naymond 'ir ._ ·Buck

W• ~aniel Lar:aen

Robert '8nn•r Milford 1f e ~rt.~o4

:De~ton c" Rec>~ll:~· Wf.lliaa B. Rick·

LOuia R. :wo1fsbeiaer

"' Yi a is

~

_x:,_;.

_L

.....l­

~

:,;,JL..

Nay a

- :-·· ..

-·-__..

-.:AUTBBWl'ICA~ BY~

• JJ~so+~tion Numpor1

,or tir4lna·nce ,Number 1;

CHRISirINE M •. ~TEIN

~;ck of th• San :~iego uni'fle~· Port ~;..'tric~

~ya · 'zYJ~- _Jik . j(GMm.;..a::l'r': --- Deputy· clerk _

Ad<>pt.ds .07 /.19/88