C. Vicario LCLS ICW SLAC Oct. 9-11, 2006. THE DRIVE LASER: EXPERIENCE AT SPARC Carlo Vicario for...

38
C. Vicario LCLS ICW SLAC Oct. 9-11, 2006. THE DRIVE LASER: EXPERIENCE AT SPARC Carlo Vicario for SPARC collaboration

Transcript of C. Vicario LCLS ICW SLAC Oct. 9-11, 2006. THE DRIVE LASER: EXPERIENCE AT SPARC Carlo Vicario for...

Page 1: C. Vicario LCLS ICW SLAC Oct. 9-11, 2006. THE DRIVE LASER: EXPERIENCE AT SPARC Carlo Vicario for SPARC collaboration.

C. Vicario LCLS ICW SLAC Oct. 9-11, 2006.

THE DRIVE LASER: EXPERIENCE AT SPARC

Carlo Vicario

for

SPARC collaboration

Page 2: C. Vicario LCLS ICW SLAC Oct. 9-11, 2006. THE DRIVE LASER: EXPERIENCE AT SPARC Carlo Vicario for SPARC collaboration.

2C. Vicario

LCLS ICW SLAC Oct. 9-11, 2006.

Summary• SPARC laser system: layout and performances

• Laser-to-gun optical transfer line: grazing vs normal incidence

• Laser-to-RF synchronization measurements

• Longitudinal pulse shaping: experience using DAZZLER

• Emissive properties of the photocathode

Page 3: C. Vicario LCLS ICW SLAC Oct. 9-11, 2006. THE DRIVE LASER: EXPERIENCE AT SPARC Carlo Vicario for SPARC collaboration.

C. Vicario LCLS ICW SLAC Oct. 9-11, 2006.

SPARC laser: layout and system’s performances

Page 4: C. Vicario LCLS ICW SLAC Oct. 9-11, 2006. THE DRIVE LASER: EXPERIENCE AT SPARC Carlo Vicario for SPARC collaboration.

4C. Vicario

LCLS ICW SLAC Oct. 9-11, 2006.

SPARC Laser beam requirements

Laser central wavelength 266.7 [nm]

Laser pulse lenght FWHM 2-12 [ps]

Electron charge 1 [nC]

RMS energy jitter (UV) < 5% [rms]

Laser pulse rise time < 1 [ps]

Laser pulse longitudinal ripples <30% ptp

Transverse intensity profile Top hat

Laser spot radius 1.1 (mm)

RMS rf to laser time jitter < 2ps

Centroid pointing stability 50 μm

Spot ellipticity on cathode (1-a/b) <10%

Page 5: C. Vicario LCLS ICW SLAC Oct. 9-11, 2006. THE DRIVE LASER: EXPERIENCE AT SPARC Carlo Vicario for SPARC collaboration.

5C. Vicario

LCLS ICW SLAC Oct. 9-11, 2006.

Ti:Sa CPA laser system by Coherent + pulse shaper

Page 6: C. Vicario LCLS ICW SLAC Oct. 9-11, 2006. THE DRIVE LASER: EXPERIENCE AT SPARC Carlo Vicario for SPARC collaboration.

6C. Vicario

LCLS ICW SLAC Oct. 9-11, 2006.

Coherent Laser System

oscillatorpumps

amplifiers

Harmonics generator

UV stretcher

Page 7: C. Vicario LCLS ICW SLAC Oct. 9-11, 2006. THE DRIVE LASER: EXPERIENCE AT SPARC Carlo Vicario for SPARC collaboration.

7C. Vicario

LCLS ICW SLAC Oct. 9-11, 2006.

Laser layout: oscillatorTi:Sa CW oscillator (Mira) is pumped by 5 W green laser (Verdi).

The oscillator head can be locked to and external master clock (synchrolock).

pulse duration 130 fs

Central wavelength 800mn

bandwidth up to 12 nm

rep. rate 79.3 MHz

pulse’s energy 10 nJ

Page 8: C. Vicario LCLS ICW SLAC Oct. 9-11, 2006. THE DRIVE LASER: EXPERIENCE AT SPARC Carlo Vicario for SPARC collaboration.

8C. Vicario

LCLS ICW SLAC Oct. 9-11, 2006.

Laser layout: time pulse shaperTo obtain the desired square profile a manipulation of the spectral phase and/or amplitude has to be applied. The most popular techniques arethe AODPF and the SLM in 4f configuration. They work at low energy level.

Dazzler

Half-wave plateGratingGrating

LensLens

f f f f

Mask

GratingGrating

LensLens

f f f f

Mask

New UV Dazzler S. Coudreu Opt. Lett. 31, (2006), 1899

Page 9: C. Vicario LCLS ICW SLAC Oct. 9-11, 2006. THE DRIVE LASER: EXPERIENCE AT SPARC Carlo Vicario for SPARC collaboration.

9C. Vicario

LCLS ICW SLAC Oct. 9-11, 2006.

Laser layout: CPAlaser pump 1 1KHz, 7 W, 100 ns

laser pump2 10 Hz, 560 mJ, 7 ns

rep. rate 10 Hz

spatial mode ~Gaussian

output pulse’s energy, power

< 50 mJ, 0.5 TW

IR amplitude jitter 3%

Page 10: C. Vicario LCLS ICW SLAC Oct. 9-11, 2006. THE DRIVE LASER: EXPERIENCE AT SPARC Carlo Vicario for SPARC collaboration.

10C. Vicario

LCLS ICW SLAC Oct. 9-11, 2006.

The third harmonic generator consists ofby two type-I BBO crystals, of 0.5 and 0.3 mm thickness.

The overall efficiency is about 8% and the energy jitter is 5% rms

In the THG the optics can be damaged by the IR high peak power (self focusing effects).

Laser layout: THG

IR

BLUE

UV

λ/2BBO1 BBO2

Filter

Page 11: C. Vicario LCLS ICW SLAC Oct. 9-11, 2006. THE DRIVE LASER: EXPERIENCE AT SPARC Carlo Vicario for SPARC collaboration.

11C. Vicario

LCLS ICW SLAC Oct. 9-11, 2006.

Laser layout: UV stretcher

The UV stretcher consists of a pair of parallel gratings. It introduces a negative GVD proportional to d, and allows output pulse length between 2 and 20 ps.

Efficiency of the grating is about 65%, the overall energy losses are more than 80%

50 112.5 175 237.5 3002

5.25

8.5

11.75

15

grating spacng mm

outp

ut p

ulse

leng

th p

s

output pulse length vs grating distance [ps/mm-nm]

mmlg /4300

Page 12: C. Vicario LCLS ICW SLAC Oct. 9-11, 2006. THE DRIVE LASER: EXPERIENCE AT SPARC Carlo Vicario for SPARC collaboration.

12C. Vicario

LCLS ICW SLAC Oct. 9-11, 2006.

Laser system layout: spectral and time diagnostics

30 cm lens

4350 g/mmgrating

CCD

UV beam

Diagnostics routinely used to monitor time/spectral features of SPARC laser :•Ir+ blue commercial spectrometers resolution > 0.3 mn •ps resolution streak camera•UV home-built spectrometer with 0.05 nm resolution 10 mn bandwidth•UV home-built multi-shot cross-correlator resolution (IR pulse FWFM)

Page 13: C. Vicario LCLS ICW SLAC Oct. 9-11, 2006. THE DRIVE LASER: EXPERIENCE AT SPARC Carlo Vicario for SPARC collaboration.

13C. Vicario

LCLS ICW SLAC Oct. 9-11, 2006.

UV spectral-temporal measurements

The UV spectrometer as single-shot time profile diagnostics.

When a large linear chirp α is applied, as in our case, the spectral profile brings to a direct

reconstruction of the intensity temporal profile

)(~

)(

)(

)()(

2

2

2

2

2

2

tItI

teA

eAtI

ti

ti

Page 14: C. Vicario LCLS ICW SLAC Oct. 9-11, 2006. THE DRIVE LASER: EXPERIENCE AT SPARC Carlo Vicario for SPARC collaboration.

14C. Vicario

LCLS ICW SLAC Oct. 9-11, 2006.

Optical transfer line I• The optical transfer line transports the laser beam to the cathode 10 m

away.

• The transverse profile is selected by an iris and then imaged on the cathode.

• The energy losses are mainly introduced by the grating used to compensate the grazing incidence distortions.

• Good pointing stability has been observed (~50 μm).

lase

r

IRIS

Page 15: C. Vicario LCLS ICW SLAC Oct. 9-11, 2006. THE DRIVE LASER: EXPERIENCE AT SPARC Carlo Vicario for SPARC collaboration.

15C. Vicario

LCLS ICW SLAC Oct. 9-11, 2006.

Laser grazing incidence

Photocathode

Beam exit

The laser beam is injected onto the cathode surface at grazing incidence angle (72°)

Advantages:1. No mirror close to the beam axis for normal incidence (no wakefield)2. Higher QE

Disadvantages:1. A circular beam becomes an ellipse on the cathode 2. Time slew: the side closer to the laser entry emits earlier than the other side

Page 16: C. Vicario LCLS ICW SLAC Oct. 9-11, 2006. THE DRIVE LASER: EXPERIENCE AT SPARC Carlo Vicario for SPARC collaboration.

16C. Vicario

LCLS ICW SLAC Oct. 9-11, 2006.

Compensation scheme

Advantages: Circular beam at cathode (>98%) Front tilt compensation (< 200 fs) Work for different spot sizes.

-1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5

-0.05

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

transform limited bw=1.6nm

horiz position [nm]

time

arr

iva

l [p

s]

H posirion mm

Simulated spot and front at cathode

T

C. Vicario et al, EPAC06

A grating with a proper g/mm can be employed to diffract the beam at 72° and be positioned parallel to the cathode. A lens is needed to counterbalance the chromatic dispersion at the image plane.

Drawbacks:High energy losses: 65%Sensitive to lens position (±1 mm)Difficult to be measuredStructures in the spot

Page 17: C. Vicario LCLS ICW SLAC Oct. 9-11, 2006. THE DRIVE LASER: EXPERIENCE AT SPARC Carlo Vicario for SPARC collaboration.

17C. Vicario

LCLS ICW SLAC Oct. 9-11, 2006.

Normal incidence setup• We change the TL normal incidence to get benefits in term of

energy budget and spot uniformity.• With this geometry the cathode’s QE is half respect to the grazing

incidence case.

Page 18: C. Vicario LCLS ICW SLAC Oct. 9-11, 2006. THE DRIVE LASER: EXPERIENCE AT SPARC Carlo Vicario for SPARC collaboration.

18C. Vicario

LCLS ICW SLAC Oct. 9-11, 2006.

Transverse profile at the virtual cathode

0 1500 3000 4500 6000

0

1000

2000

In

te

nsity a

.u

.

m

0150

0300

0450

0

0

100

0

200

0

Intensity a.u.

m

S

•Transverse spot features•Sharp edges•High spatial frequencies

•The beam transverse profile strongly influenced the e-beam brightness

•Refractive beam shaper + spatial filtering is going to be implemented

Page 19: C. Vicario LCLS ICW SLAC Oct. 9-11, 2006. THE DRIVE LASER: EXPERIENCE AT SPARC Carlo Vicario for SPARC collaboration.

19C. Vicario

LCLS ICW SLAC Oct. 9-11, 2006.

System critical performances

• Reliability – Laser failures (mainly electronics breaks) cover 20% time– Damages on optics especially in THG is not improbable

• Laser spot – Flash lamp pump non-homogeneities worsen the Ti:SA mode

• Laser drifts due to the temperature

• The energy decay with time observed is due divergence changing of the flash pumped Nd:YAG.

Page 20: C. Vicario LCLS ICW SLAC Oct. 9-11, 2006. THE DRIVE LASER: EXPERIENCE AT SPARC Carlo Vicario for SPARC collaboration.

C. Vicario LCLS ICW SLAC Oct. 9-11, 2006.

Laser to RF phase noise measurements

Page 21: C. Vicario LCLS ICW SLAC Oct. 9-11, 2006. THE DRIVE LASER: EXPERIENCE AT SPARC Carlo Vicario for SPARC collaboration.

21C. Vicario

LCLS ICW SLAC Oct. 9-11, 2006.

MotivationsLaser phase stability is mandatory for stable machine operation.For SPARC phase 1 is requires < 2ps rms, other application demands formore challenging level of synchronization.

Coherent Synchrolock

Page 22: C. Vicario LCLS ICW SLAC Oct. 9-11, 2006. THE DRIVE LASER: EXPERIENCE AT SPARC Carlo Vicario for SPARC collaboration.

22C. Vicario

LCLS ICW SLAC Oct. 9-11, 2006.

Laser to RF phase-noise measurements

Page 23: C. Vicario LCLS ICW SLAC Oct. 9-11, 2006. THE DRIVE LASER: EXPERIENCE AT SPARC Carlo Vicario for SPARC collaboration.

23C. Vicario

LCLS ICW SLAC Oct. 9-11, 2006.

Phase noise at oscillator levelStatistics on the laser relative phase

FFT of the relative phase

Stdev=0.35 degStdev=0.35 deg

Page 24: C. Vicario LCLS ICW SLAC Oct. 9-11, 2006. THE DRIVE LASER: EXPERIENCE AT SPARC Carlo Vicario for SPARC collaboration.

24C. Vicario

LCLS ICW SLAC Oct. 9-11, 2006.

RF to Laser synchronization: measurements on 10 Hz UV pulses

2856 MHz cavity

High energy UV @ 10 Hz

On time scale of few minutes the phase jitter is

within σRMS=0.48 RF deg.

Investigation of the causes of the slow drift (temperature?) and active RF phase shift compensation.

Page 25: C. Vicario LCLS ICW SLAC Oct. 9-11, 2006. THE DRIVE LASER: EXPERIENCE AT SPARC Carlo Vicario for SPARC collaboration.

C. Vicario LCLS ICW SLAC Oct. 9-11, 2006.

Longitudinal pulse shaping: experience using DAZZLER

Page 26: C. Vicario LCLS ICW SLAC Oct. 9-11, 2006. THE DRIVE LASER: EXPERIENCE AT SPARC Carlo Vicario for SPARC collaboration.

26C. Vicario

LCLS ICW SLAC Oct. 9-11, 2006.

Dazzler experience I: experiment at Politecnico in Milan

The dazzler was studied as a stand-alone system. The time profile was measured with a SH cross-correlator.The shaped profile was imposed by producing a square spectrum and add even terms polynomial phase.

Single pass in the AO crystal + 60 cm SF56 Two passed in the AO crystal

C. Vicario et al, EPAC04

efficiency 0.5

Input spectrum

Phase applied

Amplitude filter

efficiency 0.25

Page 27: C. Vicario LCLS ICW SLAC Oct. 9-11, 2006. THE DRIVE LASER: EXPERIENCE AT SPARC Carlo Vicario for SPARC collaboration.

27C. Vicario

LCLS ICW SLAC Oct. 9-11, 2006.

• The experiment was in the framework of a INFN/LCLS/SDL-BNL collaboration.

• The motivations were:– Study the effects of CPA on the shaped pulse

• red shift, saturation effect, gain function of wavelength

– Study the effects of shaped pulse on the CPA– Quantify the distortion introduced by the Harmonic

conversion– Eventually e-beam characterization

Dazzler experience at SDL-BNL

Page 28: C. Vicario LCLS ICW SLAC Oct. 9-11, 2006. THE DRIVE LASER: EXPERIENCE AT SPARC Carlo Vicario for SPARC collaboration.

28C. Vicario

LCLS ICW SLAC Oct. 9-11, 2006.

Dazzler experience at SDL-BNL

H. Loos et al, PAC05

Dazzler

CPA

tripler

Ti:Sa Oscillator

15 mJ10 - 20 psec

266 nm 0.1 mJ

130 fs, 6-8 nm bandwidth

Reduction of the e-beam transverse emittance could be observed due to this shaping of the laser.

Page 29: C. Vicario LCLS ICW SLAC Oct. 9-11, 2006. THE DRIVE LASER: EXPERIENCE AT SPARC Carlo Vicario for SPARC collaboration.

C. Vicario LCLS ICW SLAC Oct. 9-11, 2006.

DAZZLER experience at SPARC: short amplified IR pulse

A large enough pulse width (≥0.6 ps) is needed to preserve the square spectrum throughout the third harmonic generation

0.10.5

1

IR p

ulse len

gth

[ps]

Measured (solid) and simulated (dashed) harmonics spectra

C. Vicario et al, Opt. Lett, 31,2006, 2885

The UV spectral shape as function of the input IR pulse length

Page 30: C. Vicario LCLS ICW SLAC Oct. 9-11, 2006. THE DRIVE LASER: EXPERIENCE AT SPARC Carlo Vicario for SPARC collaboration.

30C. Vicario

LCLS ICW SLAC Oct. 9-11, 2006.

Equations for SH with vs linear chirp

kzj

g

eAAjt

A

Vz

A

112

2

2 1

2

1

~

1

~22

2 sin)(

AAddcI

)(22

1)()((

111

~

1

~

)2/(

)()( 11

j

j

eS

deSSAA

2)()()(

2)(

1

~ jeSA

In the frequency domain we can integrate A2 and obtain the output intensityHp: Phase matching, not depletion regime and negligible velocity dispersion

)2/( 1

Equation for the SH generation for the complex fields Ai,j

The output spectrum is the convolution product

Similar consideration can be extended to the THG

Page 31: C. Vicario LCLS ICW SLAC Oct. 9-11, 2006. THE DRIVE LASER: EXPERIENCE AT SPARC Carlo Vicario for SPARC collaboration.

31C. Vicario

LCLS ICW SLAC Oct. 9-11, 2006.

Effects of non-linear crystal tilt

2

1122

2 sin)( AAddcI

-5.8 0

5.8

SH

crystal tilt θ [mrad

]

If the non-linear crystal is tilted by an angle θ from the phase matching condition, the output spectra are distorted

The crystal tilt act as a frequency shiftand therefore it introduces an asymmetry in the output spectrum.

Simulated and measured SH spectravs the tilt of the crystal.

Page 32: C. Vicario LCLS ICW SLAC Oct. 9-11, 2006. THE DRIVE LASER: EXPERIENCE AT SPARC Carlo Vicario for SPARC collaboration.

32C. Vicario

LCLS ICW SLAC Oct. 9-11, 2006.

The UV temporal and spectral profile

• Using a chirped IR pulse (with 0.5 ps duration) and a square-like infrared spectral intensity we obtained a square-like UV shape.

• The measured UV rise time appears to be too long, 2.5-3 ps.

Page 33: C. Vicario LCLS ICW SLAC Oct. 9-11, 2006. THE DRIVE LASER: EXPERIENCE AT SPARC Carlo Vicario for SPARC collaboration.

33C. Vicario

LCLS ICW SLAC Oct. 9-11, 2006.

Simulated UV intensity profile

Ingredients to achieve this profile: 1 Perfect square IR spectrum 12 nm

• Limitation form Dazzler resolution and amplifier distortions

2 Long IR input 10 (ps)• Harmonics efficiency prop I(t)

3 140 um thick SHG crystal instead of 500um 40 um thick THG crystal instead of 300 um

• Harmonic efficiency prop. L2

4 Perfect alignment and time overlap

1 ps rise time1 ps rise time

We can obtain more sharp edges clipping the spectrum tails where it is spatially dispersed!

Page 34: C. Vicario LCLS ICW SLAC Oct. 9-11, 2006. THE DRIVE LASER: EXPERIENCE AT SPARC Carlo Vicario for SPARC collaboration.

34C. Vicario

LCLS ICW SLAC Oct. 9-11, 2006.

Modified UV stretcher to obtain sharper rise time

dtt inout

]/[35.0 cmmnps

mmlgcmf /430020 M. Danailov et al, FEL06

Page 35: C. Vicario LCLS ICW SLAC Oct. 9-11, 2006. THE DRIVE LASER: EXPERIENCE AT SPARC Carlo Vicario for SPARC collaboration.

35C. Vicario

LCLS ICW SLAC Oct. 9-11, 2006.

Preliminary measuremnts: time and spectral intensity

UV cross-correlation UV spectrum converted in time (blue)

Calculated cross-correlation between the measured IR pulse length and the UV (red)

10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101

2

3

4

5

time ps

5

1

crrrx

0.068

max crrr x( )( )

4.6 ST1

max ST1

1010 x 21.8 ST0

Page 36: C. Vicario LCLS ICW SLAC Oct. 9-11, 2006. THE DRIVE LASER: EXPERIENCE AT SPARC Carlo Vicario for SPARC collaboration.

36C. Vicario

LCLS ICW SLAC Oct. 9-11, 2006.

Modified stretcher: considerations • The spectral measurements indicate rise time

less than 1 ps can be obtained. New diagnostics is required to measure such feature directly in time.

• The energy losses due to the filtering is about 20%.

• The alignment is quite long and tedious.

• Distortions of the transverse profile and aberrations have been observed. Investigations are going on.

S

Page 37: C. Vicario LCLS ICW SLAC Oct. 9-11, 2006. THE DRIVE LASER: EXPERIENCE AT SPARC Carlo Vicario for SPARC collaboration.

37C. Vicario

LCLS ICW SLAC Oct. 9-11, 2006.

Cathode laser cleaningLaser cleaning of the single crystal copper cathode was operated moving the laser across the surface step 100 μm . The optical energy was 10 μJ focused over 100 μm diameter, at 72° deg incidence.The cleaning ware performed in presence the moderate field 40 MV/m.Improvement in term of beam brightness due to more transverselyuniform e-beam.

QE map before and after laser cleaningat low field

Vacuum during the cleaning

Page 38: C. Vicario LCLS ICW SLAC Oct. 9-11, 2006. THE DRIVE LASER: EXPERIENCE AT SPARC Carlo Vicario for SPARC collaboration.

38C. Vicario

LCLS ICW SLAC Oct. 9-11, 2006.

Conclusive remarks• SPARC laser performances are satisfying but the system

requires constant maintenance

• Critical points: flash-pumped Nd:YAG, high peak power

• Normal incidence is advisable in particular for large bandwidth lasers

• Synchronization level can be improved

• Uniform transverse laser intensity and constant QE is critical for e-beam quality

• Pulse shaping research is still facing the rise time problem. Balance between uniform transverse profile and flat top pulse in time and is still an open issue

• Cathode laser cleaning proved to be reliable technique