C-TPAT Fciq presentation 20121018 updated
Transcript of C-TPAT Fciq presentation 20121018 updated
Field OperationsMarch 2012
1
An introduction to the program, state of play and explanation of its operations
Presented by
Ron May
Director, Buffalo, NY C-TPAT Field Office
Field OperationsMarch 2012
2
C-TPAT Achievements October 9, 2012
• 10,397 - Certified Partners to current date
• 164 - Total C-TPAT staffing level
• 21,454 - Total Validations Completed– 11,516 - Initial Validations Completed– 9,938- Re-Validations Completed
• Number of completed validations by year: -2011 / 715-Initial Validations / 2,229-Revalidations
2,940-Total Validations in 2011
-2012 / 460 -Initial Validations / 1,145-Revalidations 1,605-Total Validations in 2012
• 1,453 - Total Suspensions• 1,100 - Total Removals
• Internationalization Efforts: – 6 - Mutual Recognition Arrangements: New Zealand, Canada, Jordan , Japan, Korea, European Union– 2 - Mutual Recognition Projects: Taiwan, Singapore– 12 - Technical Assistance Projects: Malaysia, Mexico, Philippines, Guatemala, China, Colombia,
Israel, Peru, Vietnam. Dominican Republic, Costa Rica, India– 2 - Capacity Building Training Programs: Ghana, Kenya– 4 - Rounds of joint validations with the General Administration of China Customs
• Security Criteria Implemented:– 10 - Business Entity Types: Importers, Air Carriers, Highway Carriers, Mexico Long Haul Highway
Carriers, Rail Carriers, Sea Carriers, Foreign Manufacturers, Customs Brokers, Port Authorities/Terminal Operators, Third Party Logistics Providers (3PLs).
• Tiered Benefits Structure – commensurate with security enhancements. Best Practices Catalog.– 329 - Tier 3 Importers
4352
2985
852
1263
88560
Certified Members by Business Type Importers - 4352
Carriers - 2985
Brokers - 852
Foreign Manufacturers - 1263
Consolidators/3PLs - 885
Marine Port Authorities and TerminalOperators - 60
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Validations By Year
Field OperationsMarch 2012
3
Tier III Importers• 329 Partners• 27% of Entry Value• 15% of Entries
FY10 – Entry Values
Field OperationsMarch 2012
4
4
“The C-TPAT Supply Chain Security Specialist (SCSS) primarily conducts C-TPAT Validations of C-TPAT member companies and serves as the principal advisor and primary point of contact for certified members in the C-TPAT program.”
• 146 SCSSs Currently On-Board; includes 18 Headquarters employees
• Seven field offices: New York, Washington D.C., Miami, Los Angeles, Newark, Buffalo, Houston
• Extensive travel
Supply Chain Security Specialist
Field OperationsMarch 2012
5
Program Travel
• Covered 6 of 7 continents
• Nearly 100 countries visited (multiple visits within higher risk countries)
– Angola - Colombia - Malaysia
– Bangladesh - Brazil - Russia
– Israel - Mexico - Guatemala
– Sri Lanka - Jordan - El Salvador
– Pakistan - Egypt - Haiti
– India - Ivory Coast
– Botswana - Nicaragua**Each SCSS averages approx. 75-100 days a year on travel
Field OperationsMarch 2012
6
C-TPAT Program Business Types
C-TPAT program currently has 10 Business Entity Types:
Importers Sea Carriers U.S./Canadian Highway Carriers U.S./Mexico Highway Carriers Rail Carriers Air Carriers Mexican and Canadian Foreign Manufacturers Licensed U.S. Customs Brokers Mexico Long Haul Highway Carrier U.S. Marine Port Authority/Terminal Operators Third Party Logistics Providers (3PL)
Field OperationsMarch 2012
7
Minimum-Security Criteria• Risk Assessment• Business Partner Requirements• Conveyance, Container & Trailer Security• Physical Access Controls• Personnel Security• Procedural Security• Physical Security• Security Training and Threat Awareness• Information and Technology Security
These criteria are posted both in Spanish and English andthe criteria for foreign manufacturers is posted in 12different languages to include Thai, Chinese and Arabic.
Field OperationsMarch 2012
8
What is a Supply Chain?
FOR HIGHWAY CARRIERS:
The supply chain for highway carriers for C-TPAT purposes is defined from the yard where the tractors and trailers are stored, through pickup at the manufacturer/supplier/vendor, through to the consignee.
Raw MaterialSupplier
Consumer Consignee
Conveyance
Field OperationsMarch 2012
9
Validation and Revalidation Visits
• Initial validation visits take place within 12 months of certification (unless documented circumstances prevent this)
• Revalidation visits take place within 4 years of original validation completed date.
• C-TPAT partner is strongly recommended to attend overseas or foreign portion of validation or revalidation visit.
• CBP covers cost of its employees for travel and accommodations. C-TPAT participant only covers cost associated with its own employees.
• Many factors are considered in selecting site visit, but primary focus is still on greatest risk to overall supply chain and CBP’s need for compliance with the SAFE Port Act.
• Additional considerations:– Recent incidents or problems at another location– Newly acquired supply chain components– Lack of additional sites to visit– Law enforcement information (internal CBP decision)– Volume or production rates from site– Weather, holidays, labor issues, political issues, disease concerns and other unique circumstances.
Field OperationsMarch 2012
10
Documented Procedures EVIDENCE OF IMPLEMENTATION How far back did you go?
Risk Assessment
Business Partners
Conveyance Security
Inspection
Physical Access Controls
Current week______________________
1-6 months________________________
6-12 months ________________________
Over 12 months____________________
Document/checklist/form
Other ____________________
None
WRITTEN PROCEDURES
Reviewed and obtained copy of procedures/documentation/files
Reviewed procedures/documentation/files - no copy obtained
Documenation uploaded in portal
Observed process / site tour
Photo evidence / document scanned
Explanation of compliance by management / department employee
Document/checklist/form
Other ____________________
None
WRITTEN PROCEDURES
Documenation uploaded in portal
Document/checklist/form
Other ____________________
None
WRITTEN PROCEDURES
Documenation uploaded in portal
Reviewed and obtained copy of procedures/documentation/files
Reviewed procedures/documentation/files - no copy obtained
Documenation uploaded in portal
Observed process / site tour
Photo evidence / document scanned
Explanation of compliance by management / department employee
Reviewed and obtained copy of procedures/documentation/files
Reviewed procedures/documentation/files - no copy obtained
Documenation uploaded in portal
Observed process / site tour
Photo evidence / document scanned
Explanation of compliance by management / department employee
Reviewed and obtained copy of procedures/documentation/files
Reviewed procedures/documentation/files - no copy obtained
Observed process / site tour
Photo evidence / document scanned
Explanation of compliance by management / department employee
Document/checklist/form
Other ____________________
None
WRITTEN PROCEDURES
Documenation uploaded in portalDocumenation uploaded in portal
Document/checklist/form
Other ____________________
None
WRITTEN PROCEDURES
Documenation uploaded in portal
Document/checklist/form
Other ____________________
None
WRITTEN PROCEDURES
Documenation uploaded in portalDocumenation uploaded in portal
Document/checklist/form
Other ____________________
None
WRITTEN PROCEDURES
Documenation uploaded in portal
Documenation uploaded in portal
Reviewed and obtained copy of procedures/documentation/files
Reviewed procedures/documentation/files - no copy obtained
Documenation uploaded in portal
Observed process / site tour
Photo evidence / document scanned
Explanation of compliance by management / department employee
Documenation uploaded in portal
Documenation uploaded in portal
Reviewed and obtained copy of procedures/documentation/files
Reviewed procedures/documentation/files - no copy obtained
Documenation uploaded in portal
Observed process / site tour
Photo evidence / document scanned
Explanation of compliance by management / department employee
Documenation uploaded in portal
Document/checklist/form
Other ____________________
None
WRITTEN PROCEDURES
Documenation uploaded in portalDocumenation uploaded in portal
Document/checklist/form
Other ____________________
None
WRITTEN PROCEDURES
Documenation uploaded in portalDocumenation uploaded in portal
Document/checklist/form
Other ____________________
None
WRITTEN PROCEDURES
Documenation uploaded in portalDocumenation uploaded in portalDocumenation uploaded in portalDocumenation uploaded in portal
Current week______________________
1-6 months________________________
6-12 months ________________________
Over 12 months____________________
Current week______________________
1-6 months________________________
6-12 months ________________________
Over 12 months____________________
Current week______________________
1-6 months________________________
6-12 months ________________________
Over 12 months____________________
Sample Matrix:
Increase Focus on Evidence of Implementation
Field OperationsMarch 2012
11
Post Incident Analysis (PIA)When a C-TPAT participant is involved in a supply chain incident, HQ C-TPATprogram staff will examine the incident and provide details to C-TPAT management sothat they can determine the correct response from the program.
All Post Incident Analysis (PIA) will be conducted within 30 days.
The Field Director will assign a SCSS team to conduct the PIA (usually involving thecompany assigned SCSS). The PIA report, with program status, and recommendationsmust be finalized within this 30 day time frame.
Once the Field Director receives and reviews the PIA report and discusses and approvesthe company status recommendation, the full report and recommended actions are thenforwarded to HQ for review by C-TPAT Management. All final decisions on PIA results,recommendations and C-TPAT program actions must be approved at the HQ C-TPATmanagement level.
Field OperationsMarch 2012
12
Canadian Company Participation in C-TPAT
Applicants Certified Validated Suspended/Removed
Importers 2 39 1041 84
Hwy Carriers
23 145 1349 187
Foreign
Mfrs.1 10 136 8
Totals 26 194 2526 279 (10%)
Field OperationsMarch 2012
13
Mutual Recognition (MR) Process
(4) Phases1. Side-by-side comparison of program
requirements2. Pilot programs of joint
validations/observations3. Signing of agreement4. Development of information sharing
procedures
Field OperationsMarch 2012
14
PIP/PEP
Presentation courtesy of:
Bill Tu
Senior Advisor, CBSA
International & Bilateral Trusted Traders - PIP Program
Field OperationsMarch 2012
15
15
Beyond the Border:“A Shared Vision for Perimeter Security and
Economic Competitiveness”• The “Beyond the Border” Declaration was announced by Canadian
Prime Minister Stephen Harper and U.S. President Barack Obama in February 2011
• Four key principles underpinning the Declaration:
- Addressing threats early
- Trade facilitation, economic growth and jobs
- Integrated cross-border law enforcement; and
- Critical infrastructure and cyber security
Field OperationsMarch 2012
16
Harmonization refers to further aligning both programs, where
applicable, in the areas of policy, procedures and
documentation practices while each country retains sovereignty
over its own program.
Harmonization Benefits:
Single application process for companies seeking to join both programs
Only one site validation required
Creates streamlined and efficient border processes
Enhances security and integrity of the company’s supply chain
Harmonization of PIP & C-TPAT
Field OperationsMarch 2012
17
17
Harmonization of PIP & C-TPAT
• Implementation:
– Phase 1: Pilot harmonization of two Canada - and two US-based highway carriers, completed in 2011
– Phase 2: Harmonization 1.0 of Canada and US highway carriers, scheduled for 2012
– Phase 3: Harmonization 2.0 of all other common lines of business, line by line (to the fullest extent possible), scheduled for December 2013
Field OperationsMarch 2012
18
How the MR process will work
• Both administrations will use risked base scoring to lower exam levels. Lower risk level will be communicated to each administration via automated systems (in development).
• Each administration will monitor application of risk reductions through normal measurement matrix’s, but will also use random audit element.
• Process will be very fluid and evolve quickly through live learning.
Field OperationsMarch 2012
19
MR benefits
• Coordination between US and Canada administrations
• Less duplication (1 visit for both programs)• Business resumption considerations for program
participants• Established points of contact within each
administration• First to receive important informational notices• Global marketability
Field OperationsMarch 2012
20
Challenges to MR process
• Logistics of process (time, travel, money)
• Differences in information collection and sharing laws, rules, and regulations
• Development of common data platform to share information (IT)
Field OperationsMarch 2012
21
Centers of Excellence and Expertise
Overview
May 2012
Field OperationsMarch 2012
22
BackgroundResponding to the Call for Trade Transformation
In direct response to calls for more uniform and efficient facilitation, and in collaboration withthe Commercial Operations Advisory Committee (COAC) during FY 2011 CBP created twopilots
The resulting pilots underwent careful concept testing and validation both within CBP andwith the broader trade community
CEE and AE Pilots
The Center of Excellence and Expertise (CEE) pilot was established in November 2010 toenhance facilitation, improve enforcement efforts, and increase CBP's knowledge of thepharmaceutical industry
The Account Executive (AE) pilot was established to work with selected “trusted partners” inthe electronics industry to facilitate trade, while ensuring continued compliance with all importrequirements
Both pilots relied on small cross-occupational core teams, with matrix staff bringing additionalspecialized expertise. At the conclusion of the pilots, the AE concept was combined with the CEE to create new centers to segment risk, facilitate trade for trusted partners and develop comprehensive enforcement strategies:
Objective: make CBP’s haystack smaller
Field OperationsMarch 2012
23
Current CentersFour Centers Currently Established since October 2011**
Pharmaceuticals, Health & Chemicals Center (NY, NY)
• Covers the full spectrum of commodities within the Pharmaceutical industry, and will expand to include Chemicals and Health equipment industries
Electronics Center (Long Beach, CA)
• Covers the full spectrum of commodities within the Information Technology and Consumer Electronics industries
Field OperationsMarch 2012
24
Current Centers continued
Automotive & Aerospace (Detroit, MI)
• Covers the full spectrum of commodities within the Automotive, Aerospace, and
transportation related industries
Petroleum, Natural Gas & Minerals (Houston, TX)
• Covers the full spectrum of commodities within the Petroleum and related industries as well as minerals
Field OperationsMarch 2012
25
What CEE’s will provide
• Centers serve as a single point of processing for businesses enrolled in CBP’s trusted shipper programs - Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism (C-TPAT) and Importer Self Assessment (ISA)
• Centers will increase industry-based knowledge to segment risk, develop trade facilitation strategies, and enhance enforcement
• The Centers will also serve as a resource to the broader trade community and to CBP’s U.S. government partners
Field OperationsMarch 2012
26
Proposed Centers
1. Agriculture & Prepared Products2. Automotive & Aerospace *3. Base Metals & Machinery4. Consumer Products & Mass Merchandising5. Industrial & Manufacturing Materials6. Electronics*7. Petroleum, Natural Gas & Minerals*8. Pharmaceuticals, Health & Chemicals*9. Textiles, Wearing Apparel & Footwear
Field OperationsMarch 2012
27
Benefits of Centers
Action• Eliminate unnecessary
transactional work for compliant importers
• Shift focus at Ports of Entry to high-risk shipments
• Provide single point of contact for inquiries
• Develop cross-functional expertise
Benefits• Fewer cargo delays• Reduced costs• Greater predictability• Better use of CBP employees• Stronger CBP to importer
relationships• Increased uniformity and
transparency for trade• CBP expertise and learning
abilities will increase with more specialization
Field OperationsMarch 2012
28
Nexus
• Joint program with CBSA• Goal is to “establish and expand trusted travel
lanes at airports, waterways, and land crossings”.
• NEXUS card fulfills travel document requirement of Western Hemisphere Travel Initiative (WHTI)
• Qualify if citizen or permanent resident of US or Canada residing in either country
• Gives expedited clearance at air, land and marine modes of travel (additional requirements for air travel).
Field OperationsMarch 2012
29
NEXUS Information
• Toll free information (US or Canada):
1-866-639-8726
www.nexus.gov
or
www.nexus.gc.ca