C. Störmer, 1904; 1929; 1950

10
C. Störmer, 1904; 1929; 1950 Allowed and forbidden regions for charged particles coming from infinity (e.g. SEP & CR) in vicinity of magnetic dipole Lemaître and Vallarta, 1932 Lemaire,J. , Effects of a southward magnetic field on Störmer’s allowed regions, Adv. Space Research, 31, N° 5, 1131, 2003

description

C. Störmer, 1904; 1929; 1950. Allowed and forbidden regions for charged particles coming from infinity (e.g. SEP & CR) in vicinity of magnetic dipole. Lemaître and Vallarta, 1932 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of C. Störmer, 1904; 1929; 1950

Page 1: C. Störmer, 1904; 1929; 1950

C. Störmer, 1904; 1929; 1950

Allowed and forbidden regions for charged particles coming from infinity (e.g. SEP & CR)

in vicinity of magnetic dipole

Lemaître and Vallarta, 1932

Lemaire,J. , Effects of a southward magnetic field on Störmer’s allowed regions, Adv. Space Research, 31, N° 5, 1131, 2003

Page 2: C. Störmer, 1904; 1929; 1950

Lemaire et al., Journal Atmospheric Solar Terrestrial Physics, 67, 719, 2005

Page 3: C. Störmer, 1904; 1929; 1950
Page 4: C. Störmer, 1904; 1929; 1950

Magnetic field : IGRFBz = 0

Oxygen ion• 10 MeV • ppa 20°• L= 2

Periodicities• Gyro : 0.056 s• Bounce : 4.8 s• Drift : 154 s

Page 5: C. Störmer, 1904; 1929; 1950

Magnetic field: dipoleBz = 0 & EF = 0

Oxygen ion• 10 MeV • ppa 20°• L= 2 Periodicities• Gyro : 0.054 s• Bounce : 4.9 s• Drift : 154 s

• Bounce phase beating: 102 s (after 23 bounces)

Page 6: C. Störmer, 1904; 1929; 1950

Magnetic field: Dipole+ variable Bz: (alike geomagnetic storm): • Dst: -100 nT• No waves

Oxygen ion • 10 MeV; • ppa 20°• L = 2 Periodicities: • Gyro: 0.054 s• Bounce: 4.9 s• Drift : 157 s

• Bounce phase beatingafter 23 bounces

Page 7: C. Störmer, 1904; 1929; 1950

Magnetic field: Dipole+ variable Bz: (alike geomagnetic storm): • Dst: -100 nT• No waves

Oxygen ion • 1 MeV; • ppa 20°• L = 2 Periodicities: • Gyro: 0.12s• Bounce: 13 s• Drift : 1570 s

Drift velocity is 10 times smaller thus the number of mp is reduced by the same factor

Smaller dispersion of Bm ; GyroRadius smaller by factor 3.3 Equatorial gyroperiod of 0+ is 16 times smaller than that of protons; therefore they are more prompt to violate the second Alfvén condition for adiabatic motion / first order guiding center approximation.

Note however again the strict adiabatic recovery of kinetic energy

Page 8: C. Störmer, 1904; 1929; 1950

SUMMARY OF SIMULATION RESULTS

•Betatron acceleration/deceleration remains the major mechanism for particle mirroring close to equatorial plane

• Fermi-like deceleration/acceleration is also an essential mechanism during magnetic storms

• ULF waves (Pi2) are certainly also good candidates to accelerate particles to higher energies

• For all these mechanisms kinetic energy and adiabatic invariants change in a reversible way, provided Alfvén conditions are verified

• The energy of trapped particles is not conserved when elmg waves are in resonance with their gyro period at any place during its bounce motion, or during its drift motion.

• it has not yet been convincingly demonstrated that these resonant wp-interactions alonoe can accelerate all the particles simultaneously up to MeV energies,in a time as short as observed (recovery phase).

Page 9: C. Störmer, 1904; 1929; 1950

PROSPECTIVE

During main phases of magnetic storms, mirror point of all charged particles of any energy and pitch angle are lifted up to higher altitudes (1);

their rates of collisions with ionospheric and atmospheric constituents are then reduced (2);

their kinetic energy is then also reduced (3); their rate of precipitation into the atmosphere are reduced (4);

they accumulate closer to equatorial region (5); this storage is enhanced by non-resonant pitch-angle scattering, and w-p interactions with all kinds of elmg waves of a wide range of frequencies and phases (6).

Page 10: C. Störmer, 1904; 1929; 1950

PROSPECTIVE ( DURING RECOVERY PHASES)

During recovery phases the altitudes of mirror points decrease for particles of all energies and all pseudo pitch angles; particles are re-energetized (7);

flux of trapped particles at lower altitudes is then enhanced (8);

precipitation into atmospheric is enhanced due to the widening of the loss cone angle, and non-resonant pitch angle scattering with VLF waves, EMIC waves and others …(8)

Simple explanations are simpler to understand