By: Samantha Zdesar. Protection of businesses from state government interference.
-
Upload
philippa-mills -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
0
Transcript of By: Samantha Zdesar. Protection of businesses from state government interference.
![Page 1: By: Samantha Zdesar. Protection of businesses from state government interference.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022033106/56649d985503460f94a8322d/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
CHAPTER 16: KEY SUPREME COURT CASES
AND TRIALS
By: Samantha Zdesar
![Page 2: By: Samantha Zdesar. Protection of businesses from state government interference.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022033106/56649d985503460f94a8322d/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
THE MARSHALL COURT (1801-1835)
![Page 3: By: Samantha Zdesar. Protection of businesses from state government interference.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022033106/56649d985503460f94a8322d/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
MARBURY V. MADISON (1803)
![Page 4: By: Samantha Zdesar. Protection of businesses from state government interference.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022033106/56649d985503460f94a8322d/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
DARTMOUTH COLLEGE V. WOODWARD (1819)
Protection of businesses from state government interference
![Page 5: By: Samantha Zdesar. Protection of businesses from state government interference.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022033106/56649d985503460f94a8322d/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
WORCESTER V. GEORGIA (1831)
![Page 6: By: Samantha Zdesar. Protection of businesses from state government interference.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022033106/56649d985503460f94a8322d/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
DRED SCOTT V. SANDFORD (1857)
“ . . . [T]he descendants of Africans who were imported into this country, and sold as slaves . . . are not included, and were not intended to be included , under the word ‘citizens’ in the Constitution, and can therefore claim none of the rights and privileges which that instrument provides for and secure to citizens of the United States.”
![Page 7: By: Samantha Zdesar. Protection of businesses from state government interference.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022033106/56649d985503460f94a8322d/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
THE 1873 SLAUGHTERHOUSE CASES AND THE 1883 CIVIL RIGHTS CASES
Slaughterhouse Cases Civil Rights Cases
![Page 8: By: Samantha Zdesar. Protection of businesses from state government interference.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022033106/56649d985503460f94a8322d/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
PLESSY V. FERGUSON (1896)
![Page 9: By: Samantha Zdesar. Protection of businesses from state government interference.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022033106/56649d985503460f94a8322d/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
LATE NINETEENTH- AND EARLY TWENTIETH-CENTURY CASES
Supreme Court decisions strengthened the economic role of big businesses.
![Page 10: By: Samantha Zdesar. Protection of businesses from state government interference.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022033106/56649d985503460f94a8322d/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
SACCO AND VANZETTI TRIAL (1920’S)
![Page 11: By: Samantha Zdesar. Protection of businesses from state government interference.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022033106/56649d985503460f94a8322d/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
THE SCOPES TRIAL (1925)
![Page 12: By: Samantha Zdesar. Protection of businesses from state government interference.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022033106/56649d985503460f94a8322d/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
KOREMATSU V. UNITED STATES (1944)
![Page 13: By: Samantha Zdesar. Protection of businesses from state government interference.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022033106/56649d985503460f94a8322d/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
THE WARREN COURT (1953-1969)
Democracy and Civil Rights for the Unites States
![Page 14: By: Samantha Zdesar. Protection of businesses from state government interference.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022033106/56649d985503460f94a8322d/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
BROWN V. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF TOPEKA (1954)
![Page 15: By: Samantha Zdesar. Protection of businesses from state government interference.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022033106/56649d985503460f94a8322d/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
BAKER V. CARR (1962)
![Page 16: By: Samantha Zdesar. Protection of businesses from state government interference.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022033106/56649d985503460f94a8322d/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
GRISWOLD V. CONNECTICUT (1965)
Right to Privacy Protecting women’s abortion rights
![Page 17: By: Samantha Zdesar. Protection of businesses from state government interference.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022033106/56649d985503460f94a8322d/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
MIRANDA V. ARIZONA (1966)
![Page 18: By: Samantha Zdesar. Protection of businesses from state government interference.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022033106/56649d985503460f94a8322d/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
ROE V. WADE (1973)