By Dr. Harold Kerznerdownload.microsoft.com/download/2/5/f/25f1c7d9-2014-4aed...The cost of project...
-
Upload
dangnguyet -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
2
Transcript of By Dr. Harold Kerznerdownload.microsoft.com/download/2/5/f/25f1c7d9-2014-4aed...The cost of project...
© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.
© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner
Version 1.1
ByDr. Harold Kerzner
© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.
© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner
1
Version 1.1
Most of the material in this presentation has been taken from two sources; Advanced Project Management: Best Practices on Implementation, 2nd Edition, 2004, and Project Management Best Practices: Achieving Global Excellence, 3rd Edition, 2006, both by Harold Kerzner, John Wiley & Sons Publishers.
©2007 by Dr. Harold Kerzner. All rights reserved. Material and slides cannot be copied or transmitted in any electronic format without written permission of Dr. Harold Kerzner.
Copyright
© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.
© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner
2
Version 1.1
Today’s View of Project Management
Today we are managing our business by projects.
Project management has evolved into a business process rather than a project management process.
The project management enterprise methodology contains business processes.
Capturing best practices is a necessity.
© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.
© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner
3
Version 1.1
Benefits of Project Management (1 of 6)
Project management
will require more
people and add to the
overhead costs.
Profitability may
decrease.
Project management
allows us to perform
more work in less time
and with less people.
Profitability will
increase.
Present ViewPast View
© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.
© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner
4
Version 1.1
Benefits of Project Management (2 of 6)
Project management
will increase the
amount of scope
changes.
Project management
creates organizational
instability and
increases conflicts.
Project management
will provide better
control of scope
changes.
Project management
makes the organization
more efficient and
effective.
Present ViewPast View
© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.
© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner
5
Version 1.1
Benefits of Project Management (3 of 6)
Project management
is really “eye wash”
for the customer’s
benefit.
Project management
will create problems.
Project management
will allow us to work
closer with our
customers.
Project management
provides a means for
problem solving.
Present ViewPast View
© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.
© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner
6
Version 1.1
Benefits of Project Management (4 of 6)
Only large projects
need project
management.
Project management
will increase quality
problems.
All projects will benefit
from project
management.
Project management
improves quality.
Present ViewPast View
© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.
© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner
7
Version 1.1
Benefits of Project Management (5 of 6)
Project management
will create power and
authority problems.
Project management
focuses on
suboptimization by
looking at only the
project.
Project management
will reduce the majority
of the power struggles.
Project management
allows people to make
good company
decisions.
Present ViewPast View
© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.
© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner
8
Version 1.1
Benefits of Project Management (6 of 6)
The cost of project
management may
make us
noncompetitive.
Project management
delivers products to a
customer.
Project management
will increase our
business and our
competitiveness.
Project management
delivers solutions to a
customer.
Present ViewPast View
© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.
© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner
9
Version 1.1
Supporting Processes for Best Practices
As project management evolved, there appeared supporting processes aligning themselves with project management.
Each of these supporting processes have allowed us to capture additional best practices related to both project management and the supporting processes.
Processes Supporting Project Management
1960-1985 1985 1990
1991-1992 1993 1994
No
Allies
Total
Quality
Manage-
ment
Concurrent
Engineer-
ing
Empower-
ment and
Self-
directed
Teams
Re-
engineering
Life
Cycle
Costing
Increasing Support
10
© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.
© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner
Version 1.1
Processes Supporting Project Management
1995 19961997-1998 1999 2000
Scope
Change
Control
Risk
Management
Project
Offices
and
COEs
Co-Located
Teams
Multi-National
Teams
11
© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.
© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner
Increasing Support
Version 1.1
Processes Supporting Project Management
2002 2003 2005 2006
Maturity
Models
Strategic
Planning
for Project
Management
Intranet
Status
Reports
Capacity
Planning
Models
Six
Sigma
Project
Mgt.
Virtual
Project
Teams
2001 2004
12
© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.
© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner
Increasing Support
Version 1.1
Processes Supporting Project Management
2008 2009 2011 2012
Enter.
Project
Mgt.
Knowledge
Libraries
for Project
Management
Internal
Certification
as well as
by PMI®
2007 2010
??? ??? ???
13
Microsoft © 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.
© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner
Increasing Support
Version 1.1
© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.
© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner
14
Version 1.1
Best Practices Questions
DEFINITION VALIDATION
IMPLEMENTATION
PUBLICATION
UTILIZATION
MANAGEMENT
REVALIDATION
DISCOVERY
CLASSIFICATION
© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.
© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner
15
Version 1.1
Question #1
What is the
definition of a
best practice in
project
management?
(Past view vs.
present view)
DEFINITION
© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.
© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner
16
Version 1.1
Question #2
How do we
discover best
practices? Where
should we look
first? Who is
responsible for
the discovery?
DISCOVERY
© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.
© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner
17
Version 1.1
Question #3
How do we
validate that
something
actually is a best
practice? Who
should perform
the validation?
VALIDATION
© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.
© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner
18
Version 1.1
Question #4
Are there levels or
categories of best
practices? If so,
who is ultimately
responsible for
determining the
levels?
CLASSIFICATION
© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.
© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner
19
Version 1.1
Question #5
Who has the
responsibility for
the ultimate
management /
administration of
the best practice
once it is
identified?
MANAGEMENT
© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.
© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner
20
Version 1.1
Question #6
Who has the
responsibility for
revalidation of
current best
practices? How is
this accomplished
and how often?
REVALIDATION
© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.
© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner
21
Version 1.1
Question #7
How are best
practices
commonly used by
companies once
they are validated
and / or
revalidated?
UTILIZATION
© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.
© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner
22
Version 1.1
Question #8
What techniques
are available by
which best
practices can be
effectively
communicated to
the employees
within a company?
PUBLICATION
© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.
© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner
23
Version 1.1
Question #9
How do we get
employees to use
a best practice?
How do we
validate that it is
used properly?
IMPLEMENTATION
© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.
© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner
24
Version 1.1
Evaluation of a Best Practice (1 of 2)
Best Practice Characteristics Yes No
Measurable Metric
Measurable Efficiency
Measurable Effectiveness
Adds Value to the Company
Adds Value to Our Customers
Transferability to Other Projects
Has Potential for Longevity
Applicability to Multiple Users
Differentiates Us from Competitors
© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.
© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner
25
Version 1.1
Evaluation of a Best Practice (2 of 2)
Best Practice
Identification
Training
Required
Governance
Required
Proprietary
Knowledge
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.
© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner
26
Version 1.1
Levels of Best Practices
Three levels of best practice maturity have been defined with minimum requirements for an “associate best practice”, “best practice”, and “mastery best practice”.
(EDS)
© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.
© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner
27
Version 1.1
Levels of Best Practices
___________• ___________• ___________• ___________• ___________• ___________• ___________• ___________• ___________• ___________• ___________• ___________
Characteristicsor Drivers ofthe Ideal Best
Practice
Wish List
Level 4: > 60%
Note: Each level contains a percentageof the ideal characteristics or drivers.
Level 3: 40 % - 60%Level 2: 20 % - 40%Level 1: 0 % - 20%
© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.
© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner
28
Version 1.1
Project Management and Sales (1 of 2)
When asked about his vision for Ericsson into the 21st century, Robert Shepherd believes that there will be:
“… a stronger tie to sales where the project
manager supports the sales phase to ensure
successful proposal generation and project
implementation to meet the customer’s
contractual requirements, which leads to
customer satisfaction.”
© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.
© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner
29
Version 1.1
Project Management and Sales (2 of 2)
According to Jim Triompo, Group Senior Vice President at ABB:
“Project management is being introduced into
areas that traditionally haven’t used project
managers. Project management in a sales
organization has proven to be critical and
should be made a central part of the sales
process.”
© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.
© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner
30
Version 1.1
Best Practices and the Sales Force
How do we get salespeople to discuss best practices with the clients? (both internal and external clients)
The salespeople must know the best practice and what value / benefit can be achieved with it.
The salespeople must make the best practice easy for the customer to understand.
© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.
© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner
31
Version 1.1
Need for a Best Practices Library
“Every new project should directly build on the learning from any similar project undertaken anywhere else in the world.”
Bill Gates in Business @ the Speed of Thought
© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.
© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner
32
Version 1.1
Best Practices Library
Effectiveness and Efficiency
Satisfaction
Future Business
Technology Advances
Project Management
CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENTS
© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.
© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner
33
Version 1.1
(3)
(32)
(6)
(136)
Computer Associates (Before 2005 Update)
© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.
© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner
34
Version 1.1
Growth of Knowledge Management
PM BestPractices
PM BestPracticesLibraries
KnowledgeRepositories
(PM and Business
Knowledge)
Integration of BusinessProcesses into the EPM Methodology
Time
Qu
an
tity
of
Info
rma
tio
nProject KnowledgeBase or TechnologyKnowledge Base (PKB or TKB)
© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.
© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner
35
Version 1.1
Growth of Enterprise Project Management
Functional Project Management (Products)
Enterprise Project Management (Solutions)
Extended Enterprise Project Mgt. (Partnerships)
Suppliers Customers
© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.
© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner
36
Version 1.1
Engagement Project Management
Engagement project management describes the steps that must be accomplished to successfully leverage your project management skills (including best practices) to attract new customers and receive follow-on work from existing customers.
© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.
© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner
37
Version 1.1
Engagement Project Management
What are you selling?
Solutions generated by your EPM system
Sharing of best practices and lessons learned
including Six Sigma expertise
Continuous flow of information from the EPM system to the customer (perhaps EPM to EPM systems)
In exchange for this, you want the customer to treat you as a long-term partner, not just a contractor
Project Focus Project Completion Long-Term
Relationships
Approach Single Sale Follow-On Work
Customer Contact When Required Continuous /
Structured
Selling Emphasis Product Features Customer Value
Deliverables Products / Services Solutions
Time Horizon Short-Term Long-Term
Customer Service Low Importance High Importance
Quality Concern Product Quality Solution Quality
Conventional Selling Engagement Selling
Engagement Project Management
Factors
38
© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.
© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner
Version 1.1
© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.
© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner
39
Version 1.1
The Hexagon of Excellence
BehavioralExcellence
Culture
InformalProjectMgmt.
Trainingand
Education
ManagementSupport
IntegratedProcesses
© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.
© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner
40
Version 1.1
The Hexagon of Excellence
IntegratedProcesses
© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.
© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner
41
Version 1.1
Integrated Processes for the 21st Century
Project Management
ConcurrentEngineering
Total QualityManagement
And Six Sigma
RiskManagement
ChangeManagement
Integrated Processes (Past, Present, and Future)
Yrs: 1990-2000
Integrated Processes
Project management
Total quality management
Concurrent engineering
Scope change management
Risk management
Current Integrated Processes
Yrs: 2001-2010
Integrated
Processes
Supply chain
management
Business
processes
Feasibility studies
Cost-benefit
analyses (ROI)
Capital budgeting
42
© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.
© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner
Version 1.1
© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.
© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner
43
Version 1.1
The Hexagon of Excellence
Culture
© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.
© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner
44
Version 1.1
The Hexagon of Excellence
ManagementSupport
© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.
© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner
45
Version 1.1
The Executive Interface
Executive is actively involved in projects
Executive acts as the project champion
Executive questions the project manager’s decisions
Priority shifting occurs frequently
Executive views project management as a necessary evil
Very little project management support
Executive involvement is passive
Executive acts as the project sponsor
Executive trusts the project manager’s decisions
Priority shifting is avoided(if possible!!)
Executives view project management as beneficial(for the company)
Visible, ongoing support
IMMATURITY MATURITY
© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.
© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner
46
Version 1.1
The Project-Line Interface
Project manager is vested with power/authority over the line managers
Project manager negotiates for best people
Project manager works directly with functional employees
Project manager has no input into employee performance evaluations
Project manager-centered leadership
Project and line managers share authority and power
Project manager negotiates for deliverables
Project manager works through line managers
Project manager makes recommendations to the line managers
Team-centered leadership
IMMATURITY MATURITY
© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.
© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner
47
Version 1.1
The Hexagon of Excellence
Trainingand
Education
© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.
© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner
48
Version 1.1
The Hexagon of Excellence
InformalProjectMgmt.
© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.
© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner
49
Version 1.1
The Hexagon of Excellence
BehavioralExcellence
The Five Levels of Maturity
Feedback
Level 1
Common
Language
Level 2
Common
Process
Level 3
Singular
Methodology
Level 4
Benchmarking
Level 5
Continuous
Improvement
50
Version 1.1© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.
© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner
© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.
© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner
Version 1.1
The Project Office (PO) or the Project
Management Office (PMO)
© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.
© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner
52
Version 1.1
Governance Issues
Poor alignment between project objectives and broader business goals
Poor business case development resulting in the go-ahead of projects that provide limited or no value
Badly specified project outcomes measured in real business terms
(QA)
© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.
© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner
53
Version 1.1
The Project Office (COE) (1 of 6)
An organization dedicated to benchmarking for project management
Organizational mentorship for inexperienced project managers
BenefitsBenefits
A strategic planning focal point for the project management process
An organization dedicated to continuous improvement and cost reduction
© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.
© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner
54
Version 1.1
The Project Office (COE) (2 of 6)
Centralized lessons
learned files on
completed projects
A “hot line” for
problems without
involvement senior
management
An organization for
sharing ideas and
experiences
An organization for
creating project
management standards
BenefitsBenefits
© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.
© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner
55
Version 1.1
The Project Office (COE) (3 of 6)
Assist Human Resources
in the creation of a
project management
curriculum and course
content
Centralized cost control
and reporting
BenefitsBenefits
Assist Human Resources
in the creation of a
project management
career path ladder or
competency model
Centralized project
planning and scheduling
© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.
© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner
56
Version 1.1
The Project Office (COE) (4 of 6)
Development of
project management
templates
Assessing risks
Identification of best
practices, internal and
external
Planning for disaster
recovery
BenefitsBenefits
© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.
© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner
57
Version 1.1
The Project Office (COE) (5 of 6)
Globalization and
training on EPM
Establishing metrics
Customer relations
management
Multilingual tools
especially for
networked PMOs
BenefitsBenefits
© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.
© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner
58
Version 1.1
The Project Office (COE) (6 of 6)
Development of a
corporate capacity
planning model
Stakeholder
management
Maintain project
management
information systems
The guardian of project
management
intellectual property
BenefitsBenefits
© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.
© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner
59
Version 1.1
The Project Office (COE)
Companies are now struggling with the organizational reporting location for the Project Office/COE.
© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.
© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner
60
Version 1.1
Types of Project Offices
Functional Project Office: Resource Management
Corporate Project Office: Strategic and Operational Issues
Customer Focus Project Office: Customer Management
© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.
© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner
61
Version 1.1
Project Office Growth
According to Jim Triompo, Group Senior Vice President at ABB:
“The project office does not deliver projects.
The projects managed by the project
management office are limited to process/
tools development, implementation, and
training. The project management office is
sometimes requested to perform reviews,
participate in division-level risk reviews, and
operational reviews in various countries.”
© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.
© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner
62
Version 1.1
CEO
Americas
Senior Director
Solution Design
EPM
PMO Mexico PMO Brazil PMO UK/Europe PMO Asia
CEO
Americas
Senior Director
Solution Design
EPM
PMO Mexico PMO Brazil PMO UK / Europe PMO Asia
Exel’s Networking PMOs
© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.
© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner
63
Version 1.1
Role of the PMO in Portfolio Management
Planning Recommendations
Are we working on the right projects?
Are we working on enough of the right projects?
Evaluation Recommendations
Are we doing the right projects right?
Are there projects that should be terminated so that the resources can be applied elsewhere?
Ideas are generated throughout the entire organization…
Evaluateprojects
• Opportunity options
• Resource requirements
• Refined project costs
• Refined savings
• Benefits (financial, strategic, payback)
• Project metrics
• Benefits realization
• Risks
• Exit strategies
• Refined people, process, technology impacts
• Schedule / milestones
• Complexity
• Standard technology?
Business Case
…then evaluated using a standard business case…
NON-VALUE ADDED BUSINESS CASES
…non-value added opportunities & projects are eliminated…
Fil
ter
64
Version 1.1© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.
© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner
© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.
© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner
65
Version 1.1
Cost Savings Due to Software
Typical cost per meeting = $550
As a result of the new software, meetings eliminated per week = 4
Total annual savings = ($550/meeting) x (4 meetings/week) x ( 52 weeks/year) = $114,400 per year.
© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.
© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner
66
Version 1.1
Cost Savings Due to Software
Current average number of meetings required per project schedule approval = 10
Expected average number after organization begins using software = 5
Average number of attendees/meeting = 10
Average duration of a meeting = 1.25 hours
Fully burdened labor rate = $70/hour
Total annual savings = (204 projects) x (5 meetings/project) x (10 people) x (1.25 hours/meeting) x ($70/hr.) = $892,500
Project Management Software
INITIATION PLANNING EXECUTION CONTROLLING CLOSURE
95 % of Today’s Software
• Portfolio management• Benefit-cost analyses• Feasibility studies• Criteria definition• Assumptions defined• Evaluation criteria• Risk management• Behavioral software
• Portfolio Management• Lessons learned• Best practices library• Failure analyses
Areas of Deficiency