By Dr. Harold Kerznerdownload.microsoft.com/download/2/5/f/25f1c7d9-2014-4aed...The cost of project...

68
© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc. © 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner Version 1.1 By Dr. Harold Kerzner

Transcript of By Dr. Harold Kerznerdownload.microsoft.com/download/2/5/f/25f1c7d9-2014-4aed...The cost of project...

© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.

© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner

Version 1.1

ByDr. Harold Kerzner

© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.

© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner

1

Version 1.1

Most of the material in this presentation has been taken from two sources; Advanced Project Management: Best Practices on Implementation, 2nd Edition, 2004, and Project Management Best Practices: Achieving Global Excellence, 3rd Edition, 2006, both by Harold Kerzner, John Wiley & Sons Publishers.

©2007 by Dr. Harold Kerzner. All rights reserved. Material and slides cannot be copied or transmitted in any electronic format without written permission of Dr. Harold Kerzner.

Copyright

© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.

© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner

2

Version 1.1

Today’s View of Project Management

Today we are managing our business by projects.

Project management has evolved into a business process rather than a project management process.

The project management enterprise methodology contains business processes.

Capturing best practices is a necessity.

© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.

© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner

3

Version 1.1

Benefits of Project Management (1 of 6)

Project management

will require more

people and add to the

overhead costs.

Profitability may

decrease.

Project management

allows us to perform

more work in less time

and with less people.

Profitability will

increase.

Present ViewPast View

© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.

© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner

4

Version 1.1

Benefits of Project Management (2 of 6)

Project management

will increase the

amount of scope

changes.

Project management

creates organizational

instability and

increases conflicts.

Project management

will provide better

control of scope

changes.

Project management

makes the organization

more efficient and

effective.

Present ViewPast View

© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.

© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner

5

Version 1.1

Benefits of Project Management (3 of 6)

Project management

is really “eye wash”

for the customer’s

benefit.

Project management

will create problems.

Project management

will allow us to work

closer with our

customers.

Project management

provides a means for

problem solving.

Present ViewPast View

© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.

© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner

6

Version 1.1

Benefits of Project Management (4 of 6)

Only large projects

need project

management.

Project management

will increase quality

problems.

All projects will benefit

from project

management.

Project management

improves quality.

Present ViewPast View

© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.

© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner

7

Version 1.1

Benefits of Project Management (5 of 6)

Project management

will create power and

authority problems.

Project management

focuses on

suboptimization by

looking at only the

project.

Project management

will reduce the majority

of the power struggles.

Project management

allows people to make

good company

decisions.

Present ViewPast View

© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.

© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner

8

Version 1.1

Benefits of Project Management (6 of 6)

The cost of project

management may

make us

noncompetitive.

Project management

delivers products to a

customer.

Project management

will increase our

business and our

competitiveness.

Project management

delivers solutions to a

customer.

Present ViewPast View

© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.

© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner

9

Version 1.1

Supporting Processes for Best Practices

As project management evolved, there appeared supporting processes aligning themselves with project management.

Each of these supporting processes have allowed us to capture additional best practices related to both project management and the supporting processes.

Processes Supporting Project Management

1960-1985 1985 1990

1991-1992 1993 1994

No

Allies

Total

Quality

Manage-

ment

Concurrent

Engineer-

ing

Empower-

ment and

Self-

directed

Teams

Re-

engineering

Life

Cycle

Costing

Increasing Support

10

© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.

© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner

Version 1.1

Processes Supporting Project Management

1995 19961997-1998 1999 2000

Scope

Change

Control

Risk

Management

Project

Offices

and

COEs

Co-Located

Teams

Multi-National

Teams

11

© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.

© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner

Increasing Support

Version 1.1

Processes Supporting Project Management

2002 2003 2005 2006

Maturity

Models

Strategic

Planning

for Project

Management

Intranet

Status

Reports

Capacity

Planning

Models

Six

Sigma

Project

Mgt.

Virtual

Project

Teams

2001 2004

12

© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.

© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner

Increasing Support

Version 1.1

Processes Supporting Project Management

2008 2009 2011 2012

Enter.

Project

Mgt.

Knowledge

Libraries

for Project

Management

Internal

Certification

as well as

by PMI®

2007 2010

??? ??? ???

13

Microsoft © 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.

© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner

Increasing Support

Version 1.1

© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.

© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner

14

Version 1.1

Best Practices Questions

DEFINITION VALIDATION

IMPLEMENTATION

PUBLICATION

UTILIZATION

MANAGEMENT

REVALIDATION

DISCOVERY

CLASSIFICATION

© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.

© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner

15

Version 1.1

Question #1

What is the

definition of a

best practice in

project

management?

(Past view vs.

present view)

DEFINITION

© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.

© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner

16

Version 1.1

Question #2

How do we

discover best

practices? Where

should we look

first? Who is

responsible for

the discovery?

DISCOVERY

© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.

© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner

17

Version 1.1

Question #3

How do we

validate that

something

actually is a best

practice? Who

should perform

the validation?

VALIDATION

© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.

© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner

18

Version 1.1

Question #4

Are there levels or

categories of best

practices? If so,

who is ultimately

responsible for

determining the

levels?

CLASSIFICATION

© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.

© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner

19

Version 1.1

Question #5

Who has the

responsibility for

the ultimate

management /

administration of

the best practice

once it is

identified?

MANAGEMENT

© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.

© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner

20

Version 1.1

Question #6

Who has the

responsibility for

revalidation of

current best

practices? How is

this accomplished

and how often?

REVALIDATION

© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.

© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner

21

Version 1.1

Question #7

How are best

practices

commonly used by

companies once

they are validated

and / or

revalidated?

UTILIZATION

© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.

© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner

22

Version 1.1

Question #8

What techniques

are available by

which best

practices can be

effectively

communicated to

the employees

within a company?

PUBLICATION

© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.

© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner

23

Version 1.1

Question #9

How do we get

employees to use

a best practice?

How do we

validate that it is

used properly?

IMPLEMENTATION

© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.

© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner

24

Version 1.1

Evaluation of a Best Practice (1 of 2)

Best Practice Characteristics Yes No

Measurable Metric

Measurable Efficiency

Measurable Effectiveness

Adds Value to the Company

Adds Value to Our Customers

Transferability to Other Projects

Has Potential for Longevity

Applicability to Multiple Users

Differentiates Us from Competitors

© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.

© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner

25

Version 1.1

Evaluation of a Best Practice (2 of 2)

Best Practice

Identification

Training

Required

Governance

Required

Proprietary

Knowledge

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.

© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner

26

Version 1.1

Levels of Best Practices

Three levels of best practice maturity have been defined with minimum requirements for an “associate best practice”, “best practice”, and “mastery best practice”.

(EDS)

© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.

© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner

27

Version 1.1

Levels of Best Practices

___________• ___________• ___________• ___________• ___________• ___________• ___________• ___________• ___________• ___________• ___________• ___________

Characteristicsor Drivers ofthe Ideal Best

Practice

Wish List

Level 4: > 60%

Note: Each level contains a percentageof the ideal characteristics or drivers.

Level 3: 40 % - 60%Level 2: 20 % - 40%Level 1: 0 % - 20%

© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.

© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner

28

Version 1.1

Project Management and Sales (1 of 2)

When asked about his vision for Ericsson into the 21st century, Robert Shepherd believes that there will be:

“… a stronger tie to sales where the project

manager supports the sales phase to ensure

successful proposal generation and project

implementation to meet the customer’s

contractual requirements, which leads to

customer satisfaction.”

© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.

© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner

29

Version 1.1

Project Management and Sales (2 of 2)

According to Jim Triompo, Group Senior Vice President at ABB:

“Project management is being introduced into

areas that traditionally haven’t used project

managers. Project management in a sales

organization has proven to be critical and

should be made a central part of the sales

process.”

© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.

© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner

30

Version 1.1

Best Practices and the Sales Force

How do we get salespeople to discuss best practices with the clients? (both internal and external clients)

The salespeople must know the best practice and what value / benefit can be achieved with it.

The salespeople must make the best practice easy for the customer to understand.

© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.

© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner

31

Version 1.1

Need for a Best Practices Library

“Every new project should directly build on the learning from any similar project undertaken anywhere else in the world.”

Bill Gates in Business @ the Speed of Thought

© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.

© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner

32

Version 1.1

Best Practices Library

Effectiveness and Efficiency

Satisfaction

Future Business

Technology Advances

Project Management

CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENTS

© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.

© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner

33

Version 1.1

(3)

(32)

(6)

(136)

Computer Associates (Before 2005 Update)

© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.

© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner

34

Version 1.1

Growth of Knowledge Management

PM BestPractices

PM BestPracticesLibraries

KnowledgeRepositories

(PM and Business

Knowledge)

Integration of BusinessProcesses into the EPM Methodology

Time

Qu

an

tity

of

Info

rma

tio

nProject KnowledgeBase or TechnologyKnowledge Base (PKB or TKB)

© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.

© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner

35

Version 1.1

Growth of Enterprise Project Management

Functional Project Management (Products)

Enterprise Project Management (Solutions)

Extended Enterprise Project Mgt. (Partnerships)

Suppliers Customers

© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.

© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner

36

Version 1.1

Engagement Project Management

Engagement project management describes the steps that must be accomplished to successfully leverage your project management skills (including best practices) to attract new customers and receive follow-on work from existing customers.

© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.

© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner

37

Version 1.1

Engagement Project Management

What are you selling?

Solutions generated by your EPM system

Sharing of best practices and lessons learned

including Six Sigma expertise

Continuous flow of information from the EPM system to the customer (perhaps EPM to EPM systems)

In exchange for this, you want the customer to treat you as a long-term partner, not just a contractor

Project Focus Project Completion Long-Term

Relationships

Approach Single Sale Follow-On Work

Customer Contact When Required Continuous /

Structured

Selling Emphasis Product Features Customer Value

Deliverables Products / Services Solutions

Time Horizon Short-Term Long-Term

Customer Service Low Importance High Importance

Quality Concern Product Quality Solution Quality

Conventional Selling Engagement Selling

Engagement Project Management

Factors

38

© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.

© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner

Version 1.1

© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.

© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner

39

Version 1.1

The Hexagon of Excellence

BehavioralExcellence

Culture

InformalProjectMgmt.

Trainingand

Education

ManagementSupport

IntegratedProcesses

© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.

© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner

40

Version 1.1

The Hexagon of Excellence

IntegratedProcesses

© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.

© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner

41

Version 1.1

Integrated Processes for the 21st Century

Project Management

ConcurrentEngineering

Total QualityManagement

And Six Sigma

RiskManagement

ChangeManagement

Integrated Processes (Past, Present, and Future)

Yrs: 1990-2000

Integrated Processes

Project management

Total quality management

Concurrent engineering

Scope change management

Risk management

Current Integrated Processes

Yrs: 2001-2010

Integrated

Processes

Supply chain

management

Business

processes

Feasibility studies

Cost-benefit

analyses (ROI)

Capital budgeting

42

© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.

© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner

Version 1.1

© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.

© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner

43

Version 1.1

The Hexagon of Excellence

Culture

© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.

© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner

44

Version 1.1

The Hexagon of Excellence

ManagementSupport

© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.

© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner

45

Version 1.1

The Executive Interface

Executive is actively involved in projects

Executive acts as the project champion

Executive questions the project manager’s decisions

Priority shifting occurs frequently

Executive views project management as a necessary evil

Very little project management support

Executive involvement is passive

Executive acts as the project sponsor

Executive trusts the project manager’s decisions

Priority shifting is avoided(if possible!!)

Executives view project management as beneficial(for the company)

Visible, ongoing support

IMMATURITY MATURITY

© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.

© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner

46

Version 1.1

The Project-Line Interface

Project manager is vested with power/authority over the line managers

Project manager negotiates for best people

Project manager works directly with functional employees

Project manager has no input into employee performance evaluations

Project manager-centered leadership

Project and line managers share authority and power

Project manager negotiates for deliverables

Project manager works through line managers

Project manager makes recommendations to the line managers

Team-centered leadership

IMMATURITY MATURITY

© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.

© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner

47

Version 1.1

The Hexagon of Excellence

Trainingand

Education

© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.

© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner

48

Version 1.1

The Hexagon of Excellence

InformalProjectMgmt.

© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.

© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner

49

Version 1.1

The Hexagon of Excellence

BehavioralExcellence

The Five Levels of Maturity

Feedback

Level 1

Common

Language

Level 2

Common

Process

Level 3

Singular

Methodology

Level 4

Benchmarking

Level 5

Continuous

Improvement

50

Version 1.1© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.

© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner

© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.

© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner

Version 1.1

The Project Office (PO) or the Project

Management Office (PMO)

© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.

© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner

52

Version 1.1

Governance Issues

Poor alignment between project objectives and broader business goals

Poor business case development resulting in the go-ahead of projects that provide limited or no value

Badly specified project outcomes measured in real business terms

(QA)

© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.

© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner

53

Version 1.1

The Project Office (COE) (1 of 6)

An organization dedicated to benchmarking for project management

Organizational mentorship for inexperienced project managers

BenefitsBenefits

A strategic planning focal point for the project management process

An organization dedicated to continuous improvement and cost reduction

© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.

© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner

54

Version 1.1

The Project Office (COE) (2 of 6)

Centralized lessons

learned files on

completed projects

A “hot line” for

problems without

involvement senior

management

An organization for

sharing ideas and

experiences

An organization for

creating project

management standards

BenefitsBenefits

© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.

© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner

55

Version 1.1

The Project Office (COE) (3 of 6)

Assist Human Resources

in the creation of a

project management

curriculum and course

content

Centralized cost control

and reporting

BenefitsBenefits

Assist Human Resources

in the creation of a

project management

career path ladder or

competency model

Centralized project

planning and scheduling

© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.

© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner

56

Version 1.1

The Project Office (COE) (4 of 6)

Development of

project management

templates

Assessing risks

Identification of best

practices, internal and

external

Planning for disaster

recovery

BenefitsBenefits

© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.

© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner

57

Version 1.1

The Project Office (COE) (5 of 6)

Globalization and

training on EPM

Establishing metrics

Customer relations

management

Multilingual tools

especially for

networked PMOs

BenefitsBenefits

© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.

© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner

58

Version 1.1

The Project Office (COE) (6 of 6)

Development of a

corporate capacity

planning model

Stakeholder

management

Maintain project

management

information systems

The guardian of project

management

intellectual property

BenefitsBenefits

© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.

© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner

59

Version 1.1

The Project Office (COE)

Companies are now struggling with the organizational reporting location for the Project Office/COE.

© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.

© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner

60

Version 1.1

Types of Project Offices

Functional Project Office: Resource Management

Corporate Project Office: Strategic and Operational Issues

Customer Focus Project Office: Customer Management

© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.

© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner

61

Version 1.1

Project Office Growth

According to Jim Triompo, Group Senior Vice President at ABB:

“The project office does not deliver projects.

The projects managed by the project

management office are limited to process/

tools development, implementation, and

training. The project management office is

sometimes requested to perform reviews,

participate in division-level risk reviews, and

operational reviews in various countries.”

© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.

© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner

62

Version 1.1

CEO

Americas

Senior Director

Solution Design

EPM

PMO Mexico PMO Brazil PMO UK/Europe PMO Asia

CEO

Americas

Senior Director

Solution Design

EPM

PMO Mexico PMO Brazil PMO UK / Europe PMO Asia

Exel’s Networking PMOs

© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.

© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner

63

Version 1.1

Role of the PMO in Portfolio Management

Planning Recommendations

Are we working on the right projects?

Are we working on enough of the right projects?

Evaluation Recommendations

Are we doing the right projects right?

Are there projects that should be terminated so that the resources can be applied elsewhere?

Ideas are generated throughout the entire organization…

Evaluateprojects

• Opportunity options

• Resource requirements

• Refined project costs

• Refined savings

• Benefits (financial, strategic, payback)

• Project metrics

• Benefits realization

• Risks

• Exit strategies

• Refined people, process, technology impacts

• Schedule / milestones

• Complexity

• Standard technology?

Business Case

…then evaluated using a standard business case…

NON-VALUE ADDED BUSINESS CASES

…non-value added opportunities & projects are eliminated…

Fil

ter

64

Version 1.1© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.

© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner

© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.

© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner

65

Version 1.1

Cost Savings Due to Software

Typical cost per meeting = $550

As a result of the new software, meetings eliminated per week = 4

Total annual savings = ($550/meeting) x (4 meetings/week) x ( 52 weeks/year) = $114,400 per year.

© 2007 International Institute for Learning, Inc.

© 2007 Dr. Harold Kerzner

66

Version 1.1

Cost Savings Due to Software

Current average number of meetings required per project schedule approval = 10

Expected average number after organization begins using software = 5

Average number of attendees/meeting = 10

Average duration of a meeting = 1.25 hours

Fully burdened labor rate = $70/hour

Total annual savings = (204 projects) x (5 meetings/project) x (10 people) x (1.25 hours/meeting) x ($70/hr.) = $892,500

Project Management Software

INITIATION PLANNING EXECUTION CONTROLLING CLOSURE

95 % of Today’s Software

• Portfolio management• Benefit-cost analyses• Feasibility studies• Criteria definition• Assumptions defined• Evaluation criteria• Risk management• Behavioral software

• Portfolio Management• Lessons learned• Best practices library• Failure analyses

Areas of Deficiency