BusinessSolutions36_Battlecards_2013

download BusinessSolutions36_Battlecards_2013

of 7

Transcript of BusinessSolutions36_Battlecards_2013

  • 8/12/2019 BusinessSolutions36_Battlecards_2013

    1/7

    Bitdefender Business Solutions 3.6

    Competitive Analysis

    April 2013

  • 8/12/2019 BusinessSolutions36_Battlecards_2013

    2/7

    Bitdefender Partner Confidential 2013 Page 2

    About Business Solutions 3.6

    Positioning

    Bitdefender Business Solutions have stood out from the competition by delivering topdetection and all the essential security and management features an SMB administratorwould need - without being over-engineered and complex and without requiring companies topay for features they will not use.

    Bitdefender Business Solutions 3.6 brings an even stronger value proposition for SMBadministrators who are looking for a comprehensive on-premise solution and who appreciatethe simple interface and approach in version 3.5. By introducing a new and completelyredesigned endpoint client, version 3.6 maintains the same familiar management console butbrings very important advantages in two of the areas that matter most: detection andperformance. This provides customers with the peace of mind, that they are using the latestand most competitive technologies to maintain their network protected, all while benefitingfrom the same intuitive interface.

    Competitive advantages

    Business Solutions 3.5 Business Solutions 3.6

    Leading detection rates Significantly improved detection The newendpoint client includes the latestBitdefender technology which is now thesame in consumer products.

    Simple architecture and interface,designed for SMB without being complexand over-engineered like other solutions

    The Bitdefender Management Consolesdoes not change, allowing administrators touse the same familiar interface.

    Remote system audit and controlcapabilities and network reports to simplyIT administrators tasks and improveproductivity.

    While competitors have added similarfunctionality, Bitdefender remains among thefew to provide integrated and granularmanagement.

    Competitive performance with low impacton protected machines.

    Significantly improved performance Over20% higher than version 3.5

  • 8/12/2019 BusinessSolutions36_Battlecards_2013

    3/7

    Bitdefender Partner Confidential 2013 Page 3

    Key selling points for Business Solutions 3.6

    After applying the patch from the Bitdefender ManagementConsole and upgrading to version 3.6, the new endpointclient will become available for deployment while theprevious client can still be deployed through thedeployment tool. The new client features a sleek andstreamlined user interface that follows the silent and

    unobtrusive approach to security.

    Strong value with familiar SMB management

    While competitors focused on squeezing new features andintegrating different consoles into their products in order todemand a price premium from SMBs, Bitdefender has keptthe simple and familiar SMB console, and has focused onwhat really makes the difference: detection andperformance. it has thus managed to cement its leadershipin protection and now delivers even better performance. The Bitdefender strategy, consoleand pricing policies* have been adapted to suite SMB needs and resources, which means

    Business Solutions 3.6 can continue to have a strong value proposition for existing ClientSecurity partners and customers.

    New endpoint client delivers over 20% better performance

    The new endpoint kit in Client Security 3.6has been optimized to deliver a significantimprovement in performance. This meansusers can receive the best protection againstthreats but without being slowed down orwithout even noticing the Bitdefender AV

    technologies working in the background.

    Uncompromising protection and leading detection technologies

    Bitdefender has recently strengthened itsdominance in independent tests, leading invirtually all of the important independenttests. The latest distinctions include: Productof the Year 2012 - AV-Comparatives, Best

    Security Software (overall) April 2012 April2013 & Best Repair 2012, AV-Test.The superior protection technologies giveBitdefender the edge in comparative tests.Offering the same awarded technologies inbusiness products lends customers the trustand confidence that they are getting the bestpossible level of protection.

  • 8/12/2019 BusinessSolutions36_Battlecards_2013

    4/7

    Bitdefender Partner Confidential 2013 Page 4

    Bitdefender vs. ESET

    To obtain better performance, ESET delivers less protection

    The technologies and scanning methods used by ESET have made their solution light, butthis also means that dangerous malware can get past the defenses and have a severe impacton the customers network. Bitdefender delivers solid performance without sacri ficing securityas demonstrated by the consistently superior results in the AV-Comparatives Real Worldprotection tests (99.8 vs. 99.1, July 2012) . Bitdefender is the Best Security Software (overall)in AV-Test (April 2012 April 2012), ranked 1 st in the latest AV-Test and also delivers 5 timesmore updates compared to ESET.

    Integrated network protection with solid antispam technologies

    The quality of Bitdefender email protection technologies is superior to that of ESET. In thelatest test Bitdefender earned a VBSpam+ award while ESET only achieved a VBSpamVerified. Customers can easily install Bitdefender protection and can manage it from thesame administration console as the endpoint solution and they have the comfort that they areusing the best antispam and antimalware technologies.

    http://www.av-comparatives.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/avc_prot_2012a_en.pdfhttp://www.av-comparatives.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/avc_prot_2012a_en.pdfhttp://www.av-comparatives.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/avc_prot_2012a_en.pdfhttp://www.av-comparatives.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/avc_prot_2012a_en.pdfhttp://www.av-comparatives.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/avc_prot_2012a_en.pdfhttp://www.av-comparatives.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/avc_prot_2012a_en.pdf
  • 8/12/2019 BusinessSolutions36_Battlecards_2013

    5/7

    Bitdefender Partner Confidential 2013 Page 5

    Bitdefender vs. Symantec

    Very poor catch rate when offline, means Symantec clients areprone to infection

    Common threats like infected files from USBs easily get past Symantec, which had the worstdetection rates in the latest AV-Comparatives file detection test (March 2013) missing 8.8%of malware, more than Microsoft Security Essentials (8%) and drastically more thanBitdefender (0.7%); also Symantec registered significantly more false positives (23 vs. 9)

    Bitdefender delivers better protection also in real-world tests from AV-Test

    In the latest tests released in March 2013 by AV-Test, on the Windows 8 platform,Bitdefender ranked first with 17 points while Symantec scored 1.5 points less, with 15.5. Inthe protection category, Bitdefender scored a perfect 6/6 while Symantec scored 5.5/6.Superior technologies from Bitdefender guarantee better protection for corporate users.Considering the staggering quantity of malware and the efforts needed to recover after aninfection, having the best protection can save a lot of money and efforts.

    Superior antispam

    In the latest VBSpam test (March 2013) , Bitdefender had the second highest score, winningthe VBSpam+ award, while Symantec came in 8th and only earning a VBSpam Verifiedaward. This demonstrates that Bitdefender is the better choice not only for endpoints, but alsofor Gateway services like Linux and Exchange mail servers.

    Virus Bulletin VBSpam Comparative, March 2013

    Solutions Final Score Rank

    Bitdefender 99.81 2nd

    ESET 99.64 6th

    Symantec 99.47 10th

    Kaspersky 99.39 11th

    http://www.av-comparatives.org/images/docs/avc_fdt_201303_en.pdfhttp://www.av-comparatives.org/images/docs/avc_fdt_201303_en.pdfhttp://www.av-comparatives.org/images/docs/avc_fdt_201303_en.pdfhttp://www.av-test.org/en/tests/home-user/windows-8/janfeb-2013/http://www.av-test.org/en/tests/home-user/windows-8/janfeb-2013/http://www.virusbtn.com/vbspam/archive/test?recent=1http://www.virusbtn.com/vbspam/archive/test?recent=1http://www.virusbtn.com/vbspam/archive/test?recent=1http://www.virusbtn.com/vbspam/archive/test?recent=1http://www.av-test.org/en/tests/home-user/windows-8/janfeb-2013/http://www.av-comparatives.org/images/docs/avc_fdt_201303_en.pdf
  • 8/12/2019 BusinessSolutions36_Battlecards_2013

    6/7

    Bitdefender Partner Confidential 2013 Page 6

    Bitdefender vs. Kaspersky

    Bitdefender delivers more frequent updates.

    Bitdefender has a high update frequency , with packages being delivered about once everyhour. With a staggering quantity of new malware being identified daily, this ensures that thelatest virus signatures are quickly propagated to customers, enhancing their level of

    protection. Kasperskys update frequency is two times slower at delivering updates comparedto Bitdefender, which means protection against newly discovered threats arrives later andthus Kaspersky users are more prone to infection from this type of malware.

    Demonstrated higher quality of malware and spam protection

    In the latest AV-Test, released in March 2013 , Bitdefender ranked first, ahead of Kasperskyand all the other competitors. This certifies the quality of Bitdefender endpoint technologiesand products. While Bitdefender and Kaspersky both have comprehensive protection suitesfor SMBs, Bitdefender ranks top not only in endpoint tests but also in antispam asdemonstrated by the latest Virus Bulletin test, where Bitdefender received a VBSpam+ award.

    http://www.av-test.org/en/statistics/updates/http://www.av-test.org/en/statistics/updates/http://www.av-test.org/en/statistics/updates/http://www.av-test.org/en/tests/home-user/windows-8/janfeb-2013/http://www.av-test.org/en/tests/home-user/windows-8/janfeb-2013/http://www.av-test.org/en/tests/home-user/windows-8/janfeb-2013/http://www.av-test.org/en/tests/home-user/windows-8/janfeb-2013/http://www.av-test.org/en/statistics/updates/
  • 8/12/2019 BusinessSolutions36_Battlecards_2013

    7/7

    Bitdefender Partner Confidential 2013 Page 7

    Bitdefender vs. Microsoft

    Forefront fails in recent AV-Test trials because of poor protection

    In the corporate review tests carried out by AV-Test in Dece mber 2012, Microsofts SecurityCenter Endpoint Protection (formerly Forefront Endpoint Protection) has failed to achieve the

    Av-Test Approved Endpoint Protection status. The results were primarily due to an extremelylow score in the protection category, where the Microsoft endpoint product only achieved 1.5points out of a total of 6. While Bitdefender does not yet participate in the corporate tests, itroutinely scores a maximum 6 points in the protection category for home products. As theprotection tests are very similar, this means Bitdefender provides optimum protection whilethe Microsoft solution exposes companies to significant risks.

    Microsoft discontinued gateway and critical server protectionsolutions

    While Bitdefender offers a complete solution for protecting and managing the entire network,Microsoft has recently discontinued some of its important products like: Forefront Protectionfor Exchange Server, Forefront Protection for SharePoint or Forefront Threat ManagementGateway. This casts doubts over the reliability and future of the remaining Microsoft businesssecurity products.

    http://www.av-test.org/en/tests/corporate-user/windows-7/novdec-2012/http://www.av-test.org/en/tests/corporate-user/windows-7/novdec-2012/http://www.av-test.org/en/tests/corporate-user/windows-7/novdec-2012/http://www.av-test.org/en/tests/corporate-user/windows-7/novdec-2012/