Business Economics 07 Theory of Cost
-
Upload
uttam-satapathy -
Category
Education
-
view
7.983 -
download
1
description
Transcript of Business Economics 07 Theory of Cost
Cost
Objectives
to introduce and discuss nature of costs
to outline short-run costs and examine the
determinants
to understand the process of constructing LATC
to outline how and why costs change in the long-run
to examine the importance of cost to the
organization
vg/lv/p-ii-6
Cost Concepts
Opportunity cost (normal profit) - cost measured in term of the next best alternative foregone
Economic costs – payment made to all the resources employed in the production of a good
Explicit costs – the payments to outside suppliers of inputs
VG/lv/P-II-6
Implicit costs – costs which do not involve a direct payment of money to a third party, but which nevertheless involve a sacrifice of some alternatives
Historical costs – the original amount the firm paid for factors it now owns
Replacement costs – what the firm would have to pay to replace factors, it currently owns
Factors hired Cost (Rs.)
seed 750.00
labor 1900.00
tractor 2000.00
fertilizer 1100.00
tube well 1250.00
Explicit cost 7000.00
Self-owned factor Opportunity Cost (Rs.)
family labor 3500.00
land 5000.00
Implicit cost 8500.00
Economic cost 15500.00VG/lv/P-II-6
Cost functionInfluenced by the character of the underlying production
function markets inputs supply functions
c = ƒ (Q, E, Pr, G ---- )
Where C = costQ = outputE = efficiencyPr = price of resourcesG = government policy
VG/lv/P-II-6
Cost-output relationships in the short run
The family of total cost conceptsTotal fixed cost (TFC) – the sum total of the
explicit costs of all the fixed inputs plus the implicit costs associated with the firm’s operations.
examples – salaries of top management officials, property taxes, interest, depreciation charges, rents on office space, insurance premiums.
TFC =
n
i
ipi1
x
where pi = prices of specified fixed inputs
xi = quantity of fixed inputs
n = number of various kinds of fixed inputs
Total variable cost (TVC)- sum of the amounts a firm spends for variable inputs employed in the production process
examples – raw material outlays, power and fuel charges, transportation cost
VG/lv/P-II-6
m
TVC = Pj Xj j =1
Where Pj = prices of specified variable inputs Xj = quantity of variable inputs m = number of variable inputs
Total cost = TFC + TVC Q = 0, TVC = 0 , TC = TFC
The family of unit costsAverage fixed cost (AFC)AFC = TFC/Q = Pfi(FI/Q)The reduction of AFC by producing more
is called “spreading the overhead”APfi = Q/FI
Unit costs
Average variable cost (AVC)AVC = TVC/Q = Pvi(VI/Q)Since APvi = Q/VI thereforeAVC = Pvi(1/APvi)Average total cost (ATC)ATC = TC/QATC = TC/Q = TFC/Q +TVC/Q ATC = AFC + AVC
Marginal cost
MC = ΔTC/ΔQ = ΔTVC/ΔQΔTVC = Pvi(ΔVI)
MC = Pvi(ΔVI/ΔQ) = Pvi(1/MP)
Cost behavior with increasing and diminishing returns to variable inputs
TP = Q = a + bx +cx2 – dx3
APvi = b + cx – dx2
MPvi = b + 2cx – 3dx2
TFC = a
TVC = bQ – CQ2 + dQ3
TC = TFC + TVC = a + bQ – cQ2 + dQ3
VG/lv/P-II-6
Cost conceptsQ TC
TFC+TVCTFC TVC ATC
AFC+AVCAFC
TFC/QAVC
TVC/QMC = ΔTC/
△ ΔQ
1. 1 107.00 85 22 107.00 85.00 22.00 22.00
2. 126.00 85 41 63.00 42.50 20.04 19.00
3. 143.00 85 58 47.66 28.33 19.33 17.00
4. 159.00 85 74 39.75 21.25 18.50 16.00
5. 174.00 85 89 34.80 17.00 17.80 15.00
6. 189.00 85 104 31.50 14.17 17.33 15.00
7. 205.00 85 120 29.28 12.14 17.14 16.00
8. 223.00 85 138 27.88 10.63 17.25 18.00
9. 243.00 85 158 27.00 9.44 17.56 20.00
10. 266.00 85 181 26.60 8.50 18.10 23.00
11. 293.00 85 208 26.64 7.73 18.91 27.00
12. 325.00 85 240 27.08 7.08 20.00 32.00
13. 363.00 85 278 27.92 6.54 21.38 38.00
14. 408.00 85 323 29.14 6.07 23.07 45.00
15. 461.00 85 376 30.74 5.67 25.07 53.00
VG/lv/P-II-6
Results of empirical studies of short-run cost functions
Name Type of Industry Finding
Lester (1946) Manufacturing AVC decreases up to capacity level of output
Hall and Hitch (1939) Manufacturing Majority have decreasing MC.
Johnston (1960) Electricity multiple-product food processing
“Direct” cost is a linear function of output, and MC is constant.
Dean (1936) Furniture Constant MC which failed to rise
Dean (1941) Leather belts No significant increases in MC
Dean (1941) Hosiery Constant MC which failed to rise.
Dean (1942) Department store Declining or constant MC, depending on the department within the store.
Ezekiel and Wylie (1941) Steel Declining MC but large variation.
Yntema (1940) Steel Constant MC
Johnston Electricity ATC falls, then flattens, tending toward constant Mc up to capacity.
Mansfield & Wein (1958) Railways Constant MC
Source: A.A. Walters, “production and cost functions”, Econometrica, Vol. 31, No.1 (January 1963), pp.1-66 VG/lv/P-II-6
Reasons for increasing MC & AC wage premium for overtime
intensive use of equipments induces more breakdowns
leaves less time for maintenance
hiring standards to be lowered
less efficient resources
vg/lv/p-ii-6
Case - McGraw Hill’s annual survey of manufacturing firms
What percentage of production capacity is currently being used?
At what percentage they would prefer to operate?
0 100% OF CAPACITY90%50%
cost
AFC
AVCMC
AC
100% OF CAPACITY90%0 50%
cost
McGraw Hill Study
TFC
TVCTC
Cost-output relationship in the long run
Objective Q at lowest cost, Find the ‘right size’ scale Increasing returns to scale – cost increases less
than proportionately – factor price increase Constant returns to scale – LTC increases in the
same proportion Decreasing returns to scale – LTC increases at
an increasing rate
VG/lv/P-II-6
Large scale – aircraft, electricity, automobile, steel, oil refining, paper, glassware, aluminum. etc.
Small scale – garments, shoes, furniture printing, publishing, farming etc.
Cost behavior and plant size
Long run minimum average cost (LRAC) or least
unit cost attainable for a given output rate
when the firm has time to change the rate of
usage of any and all inputs and firm enjoys
economies of scales more than it suffers from
diseconomies of scale
VG/lv/P-II-6
LRAC
Economies negligible Economies never exhausted – natural monopoly –
barriers – public utilities Minimum efficient scale – beyond which AC is
constant, least volume of output at which LAC is minimum.
VG/lv/P-II-6
Minimum efficient scale C F Pratten’s Study (1988)
Many firms especially in manufacturing experience substantial economies of scale
AC falls as Q increases or may remain constant MES – is the size beyond which no significant
additional economies achieved Pratten – ½ MES is the scale above which any
possible doubling in scale would reduce AC by less than 5% leading to MES
Q
MES
1/3 1/2 1
AC
0
cost
Pratten’s Study
Industry Cost disadvantage
(%)
Industry Cost disadvantage
(%)
Flour mill 3.0 Synthetic rubber
15.0
Bread baking
7.5 Detergents 2.5
Paper printing
9.0 Bricks 25.0
Sulphuric acid
1.0 Machine tools
5.0
Cost disadvantage of plants that are 50% of MES
Reasons for economies of scale at the plant level
Economies of mass production – greater specialization,
learning by doing
Learning cure- separate out technical breakthroughs,
input-cost inflation, output scale effect
Learning rate = (1 – AC2/AC1) . 100
(1 – 90/100) . 100 = 10%
Continuous process utilizing by products
Marketing economies – quantity discounts
Transport economies
Reasons for diseconomies of scale at the plant level
Increasing transportation cost
Inefficient supervision and coordination
Labor unions
Cost behavior and firm size
Reasons for economies of scale at the firm level common management economies mass marketing economies – nationwide distribution
systems and sales promotion campaigns R&D, designing new products greater market visibility and recognition financial economies economies of scope diversification as an asset in surviving fundamental
market changes control over costs, selling price, production technology,
source of financial capital, relationship with govt. .
VG/lv/P-II-6
Diseconomies of scale at the firm level Increasing difficulties and costs of managing ever-larger
enterprise
Results of empirical studies of long-run cost function
Name Type of Industry FindingBain (1956) Manufacturing Small economies of scale for Multiplant firms.
Holton (1956) Retailing LRAC is L-shaped.
Alpert (1959) Metal Economies of scale up to an output of 80,000 lbs per month; constant returns to scale and horizontal LRAC thereafter.
Moore (1959) Manufacturing Economies of scale prevail quite generally.
Lomax (1951) and Gribbin (1953)
Gas (Great Britain) LRAC of production declines as output rises.
Loxam (1952) and Johnston (1960)
Electricity (Great Britain) LRAC of production declines as output rises.
Johnston (1960) Life assurance LRAC declines.
Johnston (1960) Road passenger transport (Great Britain)
LRAC either falling or constant.
Nerlove (1961) Electricity (U.S.) LRAC (excluding transmission costs) declines and then shows signs of increasing.
Source – A.A. Walters, “ production and cost functions,” Econometrica, vol. 31, no.1 (January 1963), pp. 1-66
VG/lv/P-II-6
Case - Economies of scale
Survey by NCAER
Pre investment survey group reported manufacturing cost of writing and printing paper declines from Rs. 1489 (in 100 tonne per day plant) to Rs. 1238 (200 t. per day) and further to Rs. 1104 (300 t. per day) per t.
size of plant (t. per day)
fixed investments
(per t.)
cost of raw material
(per t.)
operating cost
(per t.)100 4473 324 1307
200 4070 263 1116
300 3945 258 1056
VG/lv/P-II-6
Sources – State Bank of India Monthly Review, November. 1975, pp. 416 -17
Case - Economies of scale
Economic and Scientific Research Foundation found that single cement plant producing 3,200 tpd required 46% less capital investment than 8 plants of 400 tpd. Cost of production was lower by Rs.100 per t. in 3,200 tpd plant.
during 1960s – 600 tpd 1200 tpd 32,00 tpd
Source -The Economic Times – March 14,1983
-The Cement Industry, K S Rajan, Economic Times, May 3, 1979,p 5.
Output elasticity of total cost-
Responsiveness of TC to the change in total production.
TC
Q
Q %
TC
Q IN %
TC IN % QeTC,
If eTC, Q <1 Economies of scale
etc, Q >1 Diseconomies of scale
VG/lv/P-II-6