Buried cone, buried layer Titan, August 2008

Click here to load reader

  • date post

    19-Jan-2016
  • Category

    Documents

  • view

    42
  • download

    0

Embed Size (px)

description

Buried cone, buried layer Titan, August 2008. Buried cone buried layer comments. Is it possible laser didn’t hit bottom every time? Intrinsic prepulse -- 19s7, 21s5 - the latter has very well defined peak. Former much broader. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Buried cone, buried layer Titan, August 2008

  • Buried cone, buried layer Titan, August 2008

    ShotDpthEnrgyHOPGImager# (um)main (J)pp requested (mJ)Pp measured ASE//Spike (mV)IntegratedMaxBkgnd - foilBkgnd - imageRadius fwhmItnegrated over foil14s32015706//10649--------19s75014207//04297.9 e66.8 e28.2 e25.5 e24.8 e13.9 e720s610011905//74004.0 e63.0 e24.6 e22.3 e25.4 e13.3 e721s1501354001400//04.2 e62.8 e24.8 e22.5 e25.4 e13.2 e721s250122100N//a6.4 e64.3 e25.1 e22.5 e25.7 e13.8 e721s35012350210(2ns)//02.7 e62.1 e23.2 e21.6 e25.3 e12.1 e721s450135400Bad trigger1.3 e68.6 e12.6 e21.7 e25.6 e11.1 e721s55012805//105.8 e67.7 e26.8 e24.3 e23.4 e13.4 e721s65013530175//08.1 e66.7 e26.4 e22.7 e24.9 e14.8 e721s750127505//75.6 e68.8 e17.2 e24.2 e22.8 e13.8 e7

  • Buried cone buried layer commentsIs it possible laser didnt hit bottom every time?Intrinsic prepulse -- 19s7, 21s5 - the latter has very well defined peak. Former much broader. 50 mJ prepulse -- 21s3, 21s6, 21s7 have -- peak definition improves with later shots. Some of the well-defined spots werent in the center of the foil. The foils dont seem to be offset that much - see 21s5,7. Need to work out relationship of x-radiographs to target images to check.Foil is not much larger than peak - but checked measuring routine against lineouts, and find results OK.

  • 19s7 Bur 50 m #1Target #1Image blurred by 30 pixels for peak measurement.Foil 350 m across => 1 pixel = 3 mImages 460 pixels acrossLineout suggests bkgnd 8 e25 pixel blur30 pixel blurFWHMProfileX-radiograph

  • 20s6 Bur 100 m #1Image blurred by 30 pixels for peak measurement.Foil 350 m across => 1 pixel = 3 mImages 460 pixels acrossEdge is noticeably lit up, but doesnt have a significant number of countsLinout suggests bkgnd 5.5 e25 pixel blur30 pixel blurFWHMProfileX-radiograph

  • 21s1 Bur 50 m #2Image blurred by 30 pixels for peak measurement.Foil 350 m across => 1 pixel = 3 mImages 460 pixels acrossLineout suggests 5 e2 bkgnd

    5 pixel blur30 pixel blurFWHMProfileX-radiograph

  • 21s2 Bur 50 m #3Image blurred by 30 pixels for peak measurement.Foil 350 m across => 1 pixel = 3 mImages 460 pixels acrossLineout suggests bkgnd 5 e2

    5 pixel blur30 pixel blurFWHMProfileX-radiograph

  • 21s3 Bur 50 m #4Image blurred by 30 pixels for peak measurement.Foil 350 m across => 1 pixel = 3 mImages 460 pixels acrossLineout suggests bkgnd 3 e25 pixel blur30 pixel blurFWHMProfileX-radiograph

  • 21s4 Bur 50 m #5Image blurred by 30 pixels for peak measurement.Foil 350 m across => 1 pixel = 3 mImages 460 pixels acrossLineout shows 3 e2 foil intensity

    5 pixel blur30 pixel blurFWHMProfileX-radiograph

  • 21s5 Bur 50 m #6Image blurred by 30 pixels for peak measurement.Foil 350 m across => 1 pixel = 3 mImages 460 pixels acrossLineout suggets bkgnd 7 e2

    5 pixel blur30 pixel blurFWHMProfileX-radiograph

  • 21s6 Bur 50 m #7Image blurred by 30 pixels for peak measurement.Foil 350 m across => 1 pixel = 3 mImages 460 pixels acrossLineout suggests bkgnd 6.5 e2

    5 pixel blur30 pixel blurFWHMProfileX-radiograph

  • 21s7 Bur 50 m #8Image blurred by 30 pixels for peak measurement.Foil 350 m across => 1 pixel = 3 mImages 460 pixels acrossLineout suggests bkgnd 7 e2

    5 pixel blur30 pixel blurFWHMProfileX-radiograph