Buncombe County Schools 2013

25
State Performance Plan/ State Performance Plan/ Annual Performance Annual Performance Report/Continuous Improvement Report/Continuous Improvement Performance Plan Performance Plan (SPP/APR/CIPP) (SPP/APR/CIPP) Buncombe County Buncombe County Schools Schools 2013 2013

description

State Performance Plan/ Annual Performance Report/Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (SPP/APR/CIPP). Buncombe County Schools 2013. Monitoring Priorities 616(a)(3) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Buncombe County Schools 2013

Page 1: Buncombe County Schools 2013

State Performance Plan/State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Annual Performance

Report/Continuous Improvement Report/Continuous Improvement Performance Plan Performance Plan

(SPP/APR/CIPP)(SPP/APR/CIPP)

Buncombe County SchoolsBuncombe County Schools

20132013

Page 2: Buncombe County Schools 2013

Monitoring Priorities 616(a)(3)

The Secretary shall monitor States and require each state to monitor its LEAs using quantifiable indicators to measure performance in the following areas:

1. FAPE in the LRE 2. Disproportionality 3. Effective General Supervision

Page 3: Buncombe County Schools 2013

State Performance Plan Reporting616(b)(2)(C)

States must annually collect data in these priority areas to analyze the performance of each LEA.

Each state must report annually to the Secretary on its performance under its performance plan.

States must report annually to the public on the performance of each LEA on the identified targets in the state’s performance plan.

Page 4: Buncombe County Schools 2013

Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (CIPP)

Buncombe County Schools Data Story

2013

Page 5: Buncombe County Schools 2013

Indicator 1:Percentage of youth with IEPs graduating from high Indicator 1:Percentage of youth with IEPs graduating from high school with a regular diplomaschool with a regular diploma

State Target: 80%State Target: 80%

2010-20112010-2011

53.6%53.6%

2011-20122011-2012

61.9%61.9%

Page 6: Buncombe County Schools 2013

Indicator 2: Percent of SWD dropping out of high schoolIndicator 2: Percent of SWD dropping out of high school

State Target: 4.7%State Target: 4.7%

2010-20112010-2011

6.8%6.8%

2011-20122011-2012

5.5%5.5%

Page 7: Buncombe County Schools 2013

Indicator 3A: District Indicator 3A: District PerformancePerformance on State Assessments Compared to on State Assessments Compared to State AYP State AYP

2010-20112010-2011

Did not meet AYPDid not meet AYP

2011-20122011-2012

Did not calculate AYPDid not calculate AYP

Page 8: Buncombe County Schools 2013

B. State Target-Participation Rate: 95%B. State Target-Participation Rate: 95% Did not calculate LEA participation rates Did not calculate LEA participation rates

C. State Target-ProficiencyC. State Target-ProficiencyReading 3-8: 71.6 %Reading 3-8: 71.6 %

10: 69.3% 10: 69.3%Math 3-8: 88.6%Math 3-8: 88.6%

10: 84.2% 10: 84.2%

Indicator 3 B & C : State Assessment Participation and Indicator 3 B & C : State Assessment Participation and Performance for SWDPerformance for SWD

Page 9: Buncombe County Schools 2013

Indicator 4a: Rate of suspension and expulsions of SWD>10 Indicator 4a: Rate of suspension and expulsions of SWD>10 consecutive days in the school year that is greater than twice the consecutive days in the school year that is greater than twice the

state average.state average.State Target: 5%State Target: 5%

2010-20112010-2011

n/a%n/a%

2011-20122011-2012

< 5 students< 5 students

Page 10: Buncombe County Schools 2013

4B: 4B: Percent of districts identified by the State as having a significant Percent of districts identified by the State as having a significant discrepancy in rates of suspensions and expulsions of children with discrepancy in rates of suspensions and expulsions of children with IEPs of greater than 10 days in a school year by race and ethnicity and IEPs of greater than 10 days in a school year by race and ethnicity and have policies, procedures or practices that contribute to the significant have policies, procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy and that do not comply with requirements relating to the discrepancy and that do not comply with requirements relating to the development and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive development and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive interventions, behavioral supports and procedural safeguards.interventions, behavioral supports and procedural safeguards.

2010-20112010-2011

n/a%n/a%

2011-20122011-2012

n/a%n/a%

Page 11: Buncombe County Schools 2013

Indicator 5: Percent of SWD aged 6-21 served: Indicator 5: Percent of SWD aged 6-21 served: Measurement A. Inside the regular class 80% or more of the dayMeasurement A. Inside the regular class 80% or more of the day

State Target: 65.6%State Target: 65.6%

2010-20112010-2011

60.1%60.1%

2011-20122011-2012

64.1%64.1%

Page 12: Buncombe County Schools 2013

Indicator 5 B: Percent of SWD aged 6 through 21 served inside the Indicator 5 B: Percent of SWD aged 6 through 21 served inside the regular class less than 40% of the dayregular class less than 40% of the day

State Target: 15.3%State Target: 15.3%

2010-20112010-2011

17.0%17.0%

2011-20122011-2012

16.8 %16.8 %

Page 13: Buncombe County Schools 2013

Indicator 5C: Percent of SWD served in separate schools, residential Indicator 5C: Percent of SWD served in separate schools, residential facilities, or homebound/hospital placementsfacilities, or homebound/hospital placements

State Target: 2.0%State Target: 2.0%

2010-20112010-2011

.9 %.9 %

2011-20122011-2012

.7 %.7 %

Page 14: Buncombe County Schools 2013

Indicator 6: Percent of preschool children with IEPs who received Indicator 6: Percent of preschool children with IEPs who received special education and related services in settings with typically special education and related services in settings with typically

developing peersdeveloping peers

Not SampledNot Sampled

Page 15: Buncombe County Schools 2013

Indicator 7: Percent of preschool SWD who demonstrate improved: Indicator 7: Percent of preschool SWD who demonstrate improved: A. Positive social emotional skills; A. Positive social emotional skills;

B. Acquisition and use of knowledge and Skills; B. Acquisition and use of knowledge and Skills; C. Use of appropriate behaviors to meet their needsC. Use of appropriate behaviors to meet their needs

2010-20112010-2011

A.1. 92.9%A.1. 92.9% 2. 42.2%2. 42.2% B. 1. 93.2%B. 1. 93.2% 2. 53.3%2. 53.3% C. 1. 89.3%C. 1. 89.3% 2. 62.2%2. 62.2%

2011-2012 2011-2012

A.1. 81.4%A.1. 81.4% 2. 28.8%2. 28.8%B.1. 81.9%B.1. 81.9%

2. 40.4%2. 40.4% C.1. 80.8%C.1. 80.8% 2. 58.7% 2. 58.7%

Page 16: Buncombe County Schools 2013

Indicator 8: Percent of parents with a child receiving special education Indicator 8: Percent of parents with a child receiving special education services who report that school facilitates parent involvement as a services who report that school facilitates parent involvement as a

means of improving services and results for children with disabilities.means of improving services and results for children with disabilities.

State Target: 50% State Target: 50%

2010-20112010-2011

Not sampledNot sampled

2011-20122011-2012

50%50%

Page 17: Buncombe County Schools 2013

Indicator 9: LEA data indicate the disproportionate representation of Indicator 9: LEA data indicate the disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that

is the result of inappropriate identificationis the result of inappropriate identification

State Target:0%State Target:0%

2010-20112010-2011

NoNo

2011-20122011-2012

NoNo

Page 18: Buncombe County Schools 2013

Indicator Indicator 10:LEA10:LEA data indicate disproportionate representation of racial and data indicate disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in specific disability categories that is the result of inappropriate ethnic groups in specific disability categories that is the result of inappropriate

identificationidentification

State Target: 0%State Target: 0%

2010-20112010-2011

NoNo

2011-20122011-2012

NoNo

Page 19: Buncombe County Schools 2013

Indicator 11: Percent of students referred for whom a referral was Indicator 11: Percent of students referred for whom a referral was received and placement determined in 90 days.received and placement determined in 90 days.

State Target: 100%State Target: 100%

2010-20112010-2011

92.1%92.1%

2011-20122011-2012

97.1%97.1%

Page 20: Buncombe County Schools 2013

Indicator 12: Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who Indicator 12: Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who are found eligible for Part B and who have an IEP developed and are found eligible for Part B and who have an IEP developed and

implemented by their third birthdaysimplemented by their third birthdays

State Target: 100%State Target: 100%

2010-20112010-2011

100%100%

2011-20122011-2012

100%100%

Page 21: Buncombe County Schools 2013

Indicator 13a: Percent of youth with IEPs aged 16 and above with an IEP that Indicator 13a: Percent of youth with IEPs aged 16 and above with an IEP that includes appropriate measurable postsecondary goals that are annually includes appropriate measurable postsecondary goals that are annually

updated and based upon an age appropriate transition assessment, transition updated and based upon an age appropriate transition assessment, transition services, including courses of study, that will reasonably enable the student to services, including courses of study, that will reasonably enable the student to meet those postsecondary goals, and annual IEP goals related to the student’s meet those postsecondary goals, and annual IEP goals related to the student’s

transition service needs. There must also be evidence that the student was transition service needs. There must also be evidence that the student was invited to the IEP team meeting where transition services are to be discussed invited to the IEP team meeting where transition services are to be discussed and evidence that, if appropriate, a representative of any participating agency and evidence that, if appropriate, a representative of any participating agency

was invited to the IEP team meeting with the prior consent of the parent or was invited to the IEP team meeting with the prior consent of the parent or student who has reached the age of majority.student who has reached the age of majority.

State Target:100%State Target:100%

2010-20112010-2011

100%100%

2011-20122011-2012

100%100%

Page 22: Buncombe County Schools 2013

Indicator 13b: Percent of noncompliance identified in the previous Indicator 13b: Percent of noncompliance identified in the previous school year corrected within 1 yearschool year corrected within 1 year

State Target: 100%State Target: 100%

2010-20112010-2011

100%100%

2011-20122011-2012

100%100%

Page 23: Buncombe County Schools 2013

Indicator 14: Percent of youth who are no longer in secondary school, Indicator 14: Percent of youth who are no longer in secondary school, had IEPs in effect at the time they left school and were:had IEPs in effect at the time they left school and were:

Enrolled in higher education within one year of leaving high schoolEnrolled in higher education within one year of leaving high schoolEnrolled in higher education or competitively employed within one year Enrolled in higher education or competitively employed within one year of leaving high schoolof leaving high schoolEnrolled in higher education or in some other postsecondary education Enrolled in higher education or in some other postsecondary education or training program; or competitively employed or in some or in some or training program; or competitively employed or in some or in some other employment within one year of leaving high schoolother employment within one year of leaving high school

Not SampledNot Sampled

Page 24: Buncombe County Schools 2013

Indicator 15a: Percent of noncompliance identified in the previous Indicator 15a: Percent of noncompliance identified in the previous school year corrected within 1 yearschool year corrected within 1 year

State Target: 100%State Target: 100%

2010-20112010-2011

100%100%

2011-20122011-2012

100%100%

Page 25: Buncombe County Schools 2013

Indicator 15b: Percent of compliance for the Internal Record ReviewIndicator 15b: Percent of compliance for the Internal Record Review

State Target: 100%State Target: 100%

2010-20112010-2011

100%100%

2011-20122011-2012

100%100%