brts PDF

Capacity Building for Promotin

Hyderabad – Aug

BRTS Ahm

g PPP in Urban Infrastructure

gust 20-21, 2008

medabad

I P GautamBRTS in Ahmedabad

City area of 466 sq kmCity population of 55 la19 lakh vehicles growi19 lakh vehicles, growi2 wheelers-73 percent2 wheelers 73 percentBus trips- 9 lakh per daShorter and more dispelength 5 8 km comparelength 5.8 km compareSuccessful tradition ofSuccessful tradition of transport service in the

d

- radial structureakh ing @ a lakh paing @ a lakh pa

ayersed average trip ed to other citiesed to other citiesoperation of municipaloperation of municipal

e form of AMTS

Experience of PPPExperience of PPP

i PPP ia unique PPP experim

outsourced supply & ooutsourced supply & oprivate sector p

20 operators

560 CNG buses

Driver hired by operatorDriver hired by operator

Bus operations and maits owner/operator

AMC d id th hAMC decides the schedeployment and also c

P model in AMTSP model in AMTS

tent

perations of buses toperations of buses to

rr

intenance- responsibility of

d l f bedules for bus collects the revenue

ResultsMajor improvements in operations service quaoperations, service qua

The cost per km of bus oThe cost per km of bus oRs. 40 per kilometer to b

Improvement in quality o

Number of buses increasNumber of buses increas1060 (2008) leading to incoverage.

Increase in number of paIncrease in number of pa355,000 (March ’05) to 93

efficiency of ality ridershipality, ridershipoperations came down fromoperations came down frombelow Rs 25/km

of buses (New Euro-III)

sed from 460 in 2004 tosed from 460 in 2004 to ncrease in frequency and

assengers per dayassengers per day 30,000 (July ’08)

BRTS Ahmedabad - KeyCh llChallenges

Determining scale, cWho should invest inWho should invest in

Infrastructure DeveloOperation and MaintB P tBus ProcurementOperation of Busesp

What should be thef i BRTS ?for managing BRTS ?Who and how shoulWho and how shoulcompensated, in case

y Issues and

coverage, and design::opmentptenance Infrastructure

institutional arrangemen??d Operating Losses bd Operating Losses be they arise.

BUS PROCUREMENT CONSOLIDATION OF EXISTI

ERATIONS & MAINTENANCE MULTIPLE PRIVATE CONSOR

STRUCTURE MAINTENANCE

FARE COLLECTION ONBOARD FARE COLLECTI

CITY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT

FARE COLLECTION ONBOARD FARE COLLECTI

SYSTEM REGULATIONS No route rationalization or newwere made. Individual bus opobtained license for a route. Othe segregated corridor wherewith their respective routes.

INFRASTRUCTURE DEVBOGOTA

COLUMBIA) 20042004

BUS OPERATIONS AND MA

BUS PROCOLUMBIA) 2004, 2004, Phase IIPhase II

INFRASTRUCTURE MA

FARE

SYSTEM R

ING BUS OWNERSBOGOTA

(COLUMBIA) 1988 1988

RTIUMS/OPERATORS

( )2000, Phase I2000, Phase I

ION BY BUS OWNERSION BY BUS OWNERS

w regulations erators

Old buses used e it coincided

VELOPMENT CITY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT

AINTENANCE

OCUREMENT CONSOLIDATION OF EXISTING BUS OW

MULTIPLE PRIVATE CONSORTIUM (paid b

AINTENANCE CITY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT

COLLECTION PRIVATE FARE COLLECTOR (escrow accou

REGULATIONS New institutional structure was formed Trunk

AHMEDABAD BRT SYSELEMENTSELEMENTS

Cl d t t k dClosed system – trunk andwork in integration with oth

Central bus lanes

Median bus stops

‘Closed’ bus shelters

Distance based fare – sma

Integrated ticketing systemAMTSAMTS

Automatic vehicle tracking

STEM - KEY DESIGN

d f d i td feeder services to her modes

art cards

m – Trunk, feeder and

g systemChandkheda

Sabarmati

RTOSola RoB

AA

Sabarmati Rly. stn

Bopal Kalup

AECGujarat

University Gandhigram Rly. stn

Gujarat University

Bopal KalupRly. St

ManRl

Shivranjani Nehrunagar

Rly.

Narol

N dNaroda villageAhmedabad

Airport.Naroda GIDC Airport

ur

Naroda

Odhav Industrial

Railway Stations

GSRTC terminals

Odhav

ur tn.

ninagar t

Soni ni chaali

estate

University/ educatiocampus

I d t i l t tstn.

Vatva

Industrial estates

Vatva Industrial estate

Phase 1 corridors (58 k

Phase 2 corridors (30.5

MULTI PURPOSE AREA

Parking, Auto Stands, SLandscapeLandscape

CYCLE TRACKS

ACCESS TO BUS STATIONS

CYCLE TRACKS

STATIONS

STRIAN SSING

MIX

eating,

PEDESCROSS

TREE LINSTREETS

BRTS BUS STATIONS

BRTS LANES

XED TRAFFIC LANES

S STATION PROTOTYYPE AT GMDC

ctronic Fare Collection Sys

Inspectors

RTS feeder/ AMTS INTERGRATED BRT stops

(off-board collection)

ndheld machines)TICKETING ON ENTIRE PUBLIC TRANSIT

SYSTEMSYSTEM

h ll ti

stem

Communication

Communicationn

Linkn

Link

BRTS fare collectionDatacenter

)Central databas

Pass issuing centeyp g

RSPECTIVE VIEW

g

E

ShWW

Ramp

Assessment of Different Imple

PUBLICPUBLICDelayed implementationHigh cost of projectnefficient operations (monopoly)Non-viable (service quality deterioration)

Govt. creates infrastructure while bus operGovt. takes guarantee of other servicesEfficient bus operationsProper regulation can lead to sustainable oProper regulation can lead to sustainable o

VATISATION OF ALL ELEMENTS Timely constructionProject Costs could be high Monopoly may harm public interestMonopoly -may harm public interestLow level of service / high fare may lead to Critical city level network in private hands my pcommercial rights etc.

ementation Models for BRTS

rators invest in buses

operationsoperations

fall in rider shipmay create issues of integration, monopolyy g p y

PP Potential in BRTS –

Curitiba URBS Bogota TransMi

urementPrivate Private

urement

Operations Private Private

Collection Public Private

t Fund Public Private

rol Center Public Public

rational Public Publicning

ng the Fare Public Public

em Design Public Public

ice Public Publicdards

– International Example

lenio

Santiago Beijing BRT

Private Public

Private Public

Private Public

Private Public

Private Public

Private Public

Public Public

Public Public

Public Public

PPAHMEDABA

PPAD MODEL

City Specific DesCity Specific Des

Integrated BRTS, AMTS l T f OSeamless Transfer - Ointegrated ticketing sysg g yCommon control centeT ffi i l iTraffic circle improvemUnique operational arrUnique operational arrsupplementary systemoperating system (dueoperating system, (duebackground)

signsign

TS and Feeder busesO ti k t f ll dOne ticket for all modes-stemer- ITS elements

tmentsangement-AMTS isangement AMTS is

m and not the main e to historicale to historical

vices

BRT TruBRT Truservices

AMTS services

Feeder services

Ahmedabad JaAhmedabad Ja

AJL is going to operag g phas the responsibility

i i AMTSexisting AMTS systeframework of efficienframework of efficiennetwork.network.

anmarg Limitedanmarg Limited

ate the BRT and also y of integration of the

i h lms into the larger nt public transportnt public transport

BRTS Infrastructsessment of all options, AMC has t ti f BRTSmentation of BRTS

lement Ownership Creatiolement Ownership Creatio

oadways AMC AMC

us Stations AMC/AJL* AMC/A

OB/Skywalk AMC Pvt SecOB/Skywalk AMC Pvt. Sec

RT Buses Pvt. Sector Pvt. Sec

MTS Buses Pvt. Sector Pvt. Sec

d P S P Seeder Pvt. Sector Pvt. Sec

TS Public Pvt. SecBus Stations advertisement rights with AJL

TS Public Pvt. Sec

RTS, AMTS & Feeder Ot

ture carefully created its own model for

on Operation Maintenancon Operation Maintenanc

AMC AMC

AJL Pvt. Sector Pvt. Sector

ctor Pvt Sector Pvt Sectorctor Pvt. Sector Pvt. Sector

ctor Pvt. Sector Pvt. Sector

ctor Pvt. Sector Pvt. Sector

P S P Sctor Pvt. Sector Pvt. Sector

ctor Pvt. Sector Pvt. Sectorctor Pvt. Sector Pvt. Sector

Operated as integrated

BRT Bus ProvisioFleet Strength of 250 buses envisoperators . Diesel Buses of Floor Hp

Bus Service Providers to purchase,specifications on specified routes unp pcharge.

Minimum of 72000 km promised to thpmonthly commitments.

Ticket revenues to be determined,,advertisement revenues to be sharedof 20:80

Selection of Bus Provider through a t

• Qualifying CriteriaQualifying Criteria

• Ownership of 40 buses or 20

R 300 l kh t• Rs 300 lakh turnover

• Bidding Criteria – Quoted Per kilo

on saged to be provided through 3-eight of 860 mm selected.g

, operate and maintain buses of givender AJL supervision for a per kilometep p

he operator in a year’s time without anp y

charged and retained by AJL. Ob bug yd between operator and AJL in the rati

two stage bidding process

0 taxis

ometer charge

ey Terms and Condiy

permanent route allocation Only kilompermanent route allocation. Only kilomber of buses allocated on each route o

senger movement patterns.

minimum km guarantee per day. Guara( l ) Thi ll i ti i ll( annual ). This allows variation in allo

rations.

te per kilometer is fixed based on formors like fuel cost, inflation indicators etc,

te per kilometer would be sufficient for ntenance but not so high that the syste

es would be charged in number of payes would be charged in number of payected from fines would be redistributed

tions of Bus Contrac

meter contract This allows changing themeter contract. This allows changing theon a regular basis based on change in

antee of km only over a longer period ot d k f d t d t ti iocated km from day to day to optimize

ula which is adjustable on external c.

bus operator to provide good m has to be heavily subsidized

yable kilometers for the operator Moneyable kilometers for the operator. Moneamongst good performers

Key Terms and CondiCreation on PPP basisCreation on PPP basis

6 FoBs planned in Phase I to allow acc

FOB Design provided by AMC

• walkway supported by three elevato• walkway supported by three elevato

• commercial space for kiosks/coffee

• toilets and lighting

• advertisement/ display spaceadvertisement/ display space

Revenue model based on advertisemen

Two stage bidding process with length o

Private sector experience - infrastructu

Process has attracted five key playersand moved to RFP stage.g

tions of FOB ss ess to BRTS bus stations

orsors

shops

nt charges, lease for commercial space.

of concession period as bidding criteria

ure construction / outdoor advertisement

s for first package, all of who have qual


Determining scale, coWho should implemeWho should impleme


What should bt farrangement for ma

Who and how shoulWho and how shoulcompensated, in case

y Issues and

overage, and designent:ent:opmentptenance Infrastructure

be the institutionai BRTS ?anaging BRTS ?

d Operating Losses bd Operating Losses be they arise.

TITUTIONAL STRUCTU

SPmanagemanage

Board of

General MCECE

Operations & PlanningOperations & Planning

heduling

Planningerations

• Fare Modelntrollinglectionality Control

• Route Planning• Financial analysis• Long term visionality Control • Long term vision

RE FOR BRTS

PV ementementDirectors

ManagerEOEO

AdministrationAdministration

• Financial manageme• Human Resource• Physical Resource

Marketing and communications

M k ti


Determining scale, coWho should implemeWho should impleme


What should be thef i BRTS ?for managing BRTS ?Who and how shoWho and how shobe compensated, in

y Issues and

overage, and designent:ent:opmentptenance Infrastructure

institutional arrangemen??ould Operating Losseould Operating Losse

case they arise.

Financing BRTS

Capital Expenditure fuCapital Expenditure fu

Operating Expenditurp g pticket and advertisem

Any shortfall would be

N d lNew revenue modelsPPP for Bus Stop O&PPP for Bus Stop O&

Commercial exploitat

Leveraging land use

O td h diOutdoor hoardings a

unded through NURMunded through NURM

re funded partly througp y gment revenues.

e funded by AMC.

b i l d f thbeing explored further:&M&M

tion of Terminal/ Depot land

pattern

d d ti t i htnd advertisement rights

Conclusion and Key L

Ahmedabad BRTS is suAhmedabad BRTS is suof PPP formats in infras

The journey so far hlessons :lessons :

Indigenous and city spel devolved.

While entire projectp junbundled projects suc

Institutional Capacity tInstitutional Capacity taugmentation.

essons

uccessfully using a numbeuccessfully using a numbestructure and bus provisio

has thrown up some ke

ecific model of PPP needs to b

may not lend itself to PPPych as FOB may find application.

to monitor and supervise neeto monitor and supervise nee

THANK YOU

brts PDF

Documents

Transcript of brts PDF