Bringing Policy to Practice The Concept of Dairy Hubs ILRI dairy EADD... · Bringing Policy to...
Transcript of Bringing Policy to Practice The Concept of Dairy Hubs ILRI dairy EADD... · Bringing Policy to...
Bringing Policy to Practice
The Concept of Dairy Hubs
Presentation to the FSNWG by Stuart WorsleyAcknowledgments to Isabelle Baltenweck, Amos Omore and Jo Cadilhon
• People know a lot
• People know what they want
• People are quite capable
• Context often blocks action, especially when
there is a big power difference
• Knowledge and technology can transform
• Development facilitation seeks to link potential
• Important to think across whole systems
• Clustering is proving to be an effective way to
link and unleash potential, and offer system
coherence 2
Principles of Development to Think About
Clusters are geographic concentrations of interconnected
companies, specialized suppliers, service providers, and
associated institutions in a particular field that are present
in a nation or region.
Clusters arise because they increase the productivity with
which companies can compete. The development and
upgrading of clusters is an important agenda for
governments, companies, and other institutions.
Cluster development initiatives are an important new
direction in economic policy, building on earlier efforts in
macroeconomic stabilization, privatization, market opening,
and reducing the costs of doing business4
Clustering"Clusters and the New Economics of Competition“ Michael E. Porter, Harvard Business Review, 1998
• 1902 – Europeans bring exotic cattle and produce milk
• 1954 – African dairy farmers allowed to produce
commercially
• 1964 – Kibaki Commission opens KCC to all producers
• 1991 – Privatization of key services
• 1992 – Liberalization of markets – KCC monopoly ends
• 1996 – Brookside is born
• 1999 – KCC almost bankrupt. Markets become informal
and volatile no investment
• 2003 – NARC commits to reviving KCC and KMC
• Now – Still waiting for the new Dairy Act
5
A Little History about Dairy in Kenya
• No money in dairy!!
• Volatile Prices
• Milk Quality Control
• Perishability
• Seasonality and feed supply
• Collective dysfunction
• Access to capital
• Uncertain and high service and input
prices 6
The Issues Arising
ILRI in brief
ILRI
a member of the CGIAR Consortium which conducts food and
environmental research
to help alleviate poverty and increase food security
while protecting the natural resource base
700 staff
100 scientists and
researchers
more than 30 scientific
disciplines
Two large campuses
(Kenya, Ethiopia).
2012 budget USD 60 mill.
ILRI works with a range of
partners
Mali
Nigeria
Mozambique
Kenya
Ethiopia
India
Sri Lanka
China
Laos
Vietnam
Thailand
ILRI’s vision: A world made better for poor people in developing countries by
improving agricultural systems in which livestock are important.7
An Outline
1. Hubs for pro-poor livestock value chains
development
2. The East Africa Dairy Development Project
EADD background, vision and objectives
EADD hubs model
Assessment results: provision of extension services
by EADD hubs
3. Way forward for Cluster Hubs
8
Pro-poor Livestock Development and Value Chains
ILRI fosters a demand-led development model
Informal markets provide substantial opportunities and can
be made to function well
Market access and utilisation can be improved by: Access to inputs
Access to services
Training and institutional capacity building
Reduced transaction costs
Better risk management
Improved market access and utilisation improve the
livelihoods of the poor Involving multiple actors
With benefits to women
9
The Role of Hubs in Pro-poor Livestock Development
Hubs show promise:
As an ORGANISATIONAL arrangement
As a means of intervening
What are appropriate organizational and
institutional mechanisms in various contexts?
Intensive versus extensive production systems
Strong versus poor government support
Dynamic versus low private sector involvement
10
What do hubs do?
Hubs provide a critical mass of producers, products or
inputs use, thus attracting other market actors
Hubs provide a contact point
They reduce communication
costs
They reduce transactions costs
Hubs enable countervailing
market power
They provide for network effects:
knowledge, technology and
innovation
Hubs facilitate peer pressures 11
ILRI contributions to dairy hubs projects
Design, implement and analyse baseline survey
Support the design and implementation of a monitoring
and evaluation system for hubs
Analyse results from monitoring system
Collate and document lessons learned, including on
issues related to gender and youth
Design, pilot test and monitor selected interventions
related to feed, animal production and marketing
Support projects’ technical activities on extension,
breeding and improving milk quality, etc.
12
EADD background
A large proportion of the farming population in East
Africa consists of subsistence farmers with low market
orientation for both farm inputs and outputs
Smallholders are limited by low levels of production,
product quality and market infrastructure:
Low feed and fodder quality
Post-harvest losses
Lack of processing equipment
ILRI partnered with Heifer International and other
organizations to pilot test a new dairy development
model in East Africa: the East Africa Dairy Development
Project was launched early 2008 with financial support
from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation13
EADD vision and objectives
Vision
Transform the lives of 179,000 smallholder farming
families (approximately 1 million people) by doubling
their household dairy income in 10 years (Aiming at $33
million)
Objectives
Harness information for decisions and innovation
Expand access to markets
Increase productivity and
efficiencies of scale
14
EADD hubs
TRANSPORTERS
TESTING
FARMERS
FIELD DAYS
FEED
SUPPLY
AI &
EXTENSION
OTHER RELATED
MEs
CHILLING or BULKING
FACILITIES
HARDWARE SUPPLIERS
VILLAGE BANKS
15
EADD1 pilot phase – Factsheet
Scope
Duration: Jan 2008-Jun 2012
Budget: USD42.85m (BMGF)
Investment fund: USD5.0m
BMGF: USD2.5m
Heifer: USD2.5m
Partners
BMGF
HI – lead
TNS – business development
ILRI – knowledge-based learning
ABS – genetics & breeding
ICRAF – feeds & feeding
Structure (>120 staff)
Country offices
Kenya
Rwanda
Uganda
Regional office
16
EADD hubs
At the heart of EADD is the hub approach which aimed to increase dairy
income of poor dairy farmers through various interventions along the value
chains so as to improve farm productivity and market access
Dairy hubs serve as community anchors for industry knowledge sharing,
business services and market access
The hub approach as implemented by EADD facilitates the emergence or
strengthening of a network of inputs and services providers and the set up
of a credit facility mechanism
Progressively the hub becomes a platform used by other inputs and
services providers to reach smallholder farmers
Possible add-ons include inputs for activities other than dairy, savings and
credit facilities, household expenses (food, medical and school expenses),
energy saving solutions (bio-gas and solar panels)
When fully functioning, the dairy hub is a dynamic cluster of services and
activities that generate greater income for dairy farmers
17
1. Beneficiaries are selected based on need, opportunity and initiative
2. Farmers are mobilized into cooperatives, associations or producer
companies
3. Companies are assisted to set up infrastructure to market milk and
deliver inputs to members through the ‘Dairy Hub.’
4. EADD staff provide technical assistance to producer companies to
achieve farmer goals in a sustainable manner
EADD approach
18
Some lessons learned from
the EADD hub approach
Hubs should be seen as an approach, rather than a model, with
various ‘options’ to choose from, depending on farmers’ capacity,
state of the industry and external environment:
Hubs centered around provision of inputs and services
Hubs centered around bulking without cooler
Hubs centered around chilling plants
In some locations, the chilling plants were not successful to catalyse
farmers around the hub but other services provided were useful to
farmers
Provision of inputs and services, including advisory services can be
done in-house, like in the case of a cooperative, or out-sourced
For advisory services, it is important to embed services in the hub
for accountability and sustainability issues
19
Assessment of extension services
provision by hubs
Overall, 82 dairy farmer business association (DFBAs) were
supported in three countries and their progress monitored in early
2012
EADD-supported sites were assessed on 5 dimensions:
Feeding
Breeding
Animal health
Milk quality
Extension services structures
Scores can vary between 0 (low level of development) and 100 (fully
developed sites which no longer require external assistance)
Sites with scores above 60% are considered ‘mature’ and require
only minimal external support
20
21
Actual development scores are distributedfrom 7.5 to 62 (%)
0.00
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
30.00
35.00
40.00
45.00
50.00
55.00
60.00
65.00
70.00
- 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 45.0 50.0 55.0 60.0 65.0 70.0 75.0 80.0 85.0 90.0 95.0 100.0
Sco
re
Percentile
Kenya Rwanda Uganda
Lowest
7.5 (NSAMBYA, Uganda)
25% quartile
27.3 (KIBOGA WEST, Uganda)
Median
34.8 (ZIGOTI, Uganda)
75% quartile
42.0 (GASI,Rwanda)
Highest
62.0 (TANYIKINA, Kenya)
Source: 2012 Stage Gate Assessment Data, May 2012 22
Way forward: capacity building models
for hubs
Focus on provision of advisory and technical services
Assess effectiveness, efficiency and sustainability of four main
extension approaches using hubs in various environments
What approach works best to reach out to women, youth and poor
farmers?
Bundled services by private extension agents
Private extension agents contracted by hub
Value chain partner provides extension to farmers
Use public service extension services
Assess whether the approach can be used in other livestock value
chains (pigs and small ruminants)
Compare hubs with other capacity building models: cooperative,
private franchised system (SIDAI), etc.
Exploration of different cluster nodes – check off systems23
Thank You
24