Bringing Equity and Quality Learning Together: Institutional Priorities for Tracking and Advancing...
6
Bringing Equity and Quality Learning Together: Institutional Priorities for Tracking and Advancing Underserved Students’ Success Key findings from a survey among 325 Chief Academic Officers or designated representatives at AAC&U member institutions, conducted July 15 to October 13, 2015, by Hart Research Associates for the Association of American Colleges and Universities
-
Upload
stella-james -
Category
Documents
-
view
222 -
download
0
description
More institutions are tracking and disaggregating data on race/ ethnicity than on other categories. 3 Graduation rates Retention rates Participation in high- impact practices Credit/course completion milestones Achievement of learning outcomes Enrollment in remedial courses Completion of remedial courses Institution tracks 100% 78% 75% 70% 63% 61% Institution disaggregates by: Race/ ethnicity 80% 30% 31% 16% 31% 30% Socioeconomic status 39% 40% 16% 9% 17% 15% Parents’ education 29% 12% 6% 11% 10%
Transcript of Bringing Equity and Quality Learning Together: Institutional Priorities for Tracking and Advancing...
Bringing Equity and Quality Learning Together: Institutional Priorities for Tracking and
Advancing Underserved Students’ Success
Key findings from a survey among 325 Chief Academic Officers or designated representatives at AAC&U member institutions, conducted July 15 to October 13, 2015,
by Hart Research Associates for the Association of American Colleges and Universities
Institutions track data on persistence, graduation, high-impact practices (HIPs), and learning outcomes; many fewer disag-gregate data on HIPs and learning outcomes.
Graduation rates
Retention ratesParticipation in high-
impact practicesCredit/course
completion milestones
Achievement of learning outcomes
Enrollment in remedial courses
Completion of remedial courses
2
More institutions are tracking and disaggregating data on race/ ethnicity than on other categories.
3
Graduation ratesRetention ratesParticipation in high-impact practicesCredit/course completion milestonesAchievement of learning outcomesEnrollment in remedial coursesCompletion of remedial courses
Institution
tracks100%100%78%
75%
70%
63%
61%
Institution disaggregates by:Race/
ethnicity
80%80%30%
31%
16%
31%
30%
Socioeconomic status
39%40%16%
16%
9%
17%
15%
Parents’education
29%29%12%
12%
6%
11%
10%
More institutions are setting equity goals on retention/on-time graduation by race/ethnicity than by other areas and groups.
4
Retention and/or on-time graduationAchievement of student learning outcomesParticipation in high-impact learning practices
By the following groups:
Race/ethnicit
y57%
31%
28%
Socioeconomic status
36%
24%
23%
Parents’education
27%
14%
15%
My institution has set goals to close gaps in the following areas:
The majority have or are developing equity goals to build new opportunities for high-impact learning for first-generation students, low-income students, and/or students of color.
Have equity goals
Do not have but are planning to develop equity goals
Do not have and do not have plans to develop
5
Does your institution have specific, explicit equity goals that are aimed at building new opportunities for high-impact learning for first-generation students, low-income students, and/or students of color?
The majority have or are developing programs to build faculty capacity to use culturally competent teaching/program strategies and/or to be more successful with minority, low-income, and/or first-generation college students.
Have program to be more successful with minority,
low-income, first-generation college students
Do not have but are planning to develop program
Do not have and do not have plans to develop
6
Does your institution have a program to build faculty, instructor, and/or staff capacity to use culturally competent teaching/program strategies and/or to be more successful with minority, low-income, and/or first-generation college students?
