Briefs from th e Suprem Coure ot f the Unite Stated s · Briefs from th e Suprem Coure ot f the...

9
Briefs from the Supreme Court of the United States No. 485 October Term I898 The Chickasaw Nation, Appellant vs. T. D. Arnold, et. al., Brief in opposition to motion to advance No. 496 October Term 1899 The United States, Appellant vs. Richard C. Wiggs, et. al,, Motion to dismiss appeal Brief for Appellant same Appeal from District Court in Chickasaw Natiion Brief for Appellant Nos. 469, 470, 471, 472, 473 October Term I898 a. The Chickasaw Nation, Appellant vs. A. B, Roff, Appellees b . same vs. A,J, Love c. same vs. Andrew B. Hill, et. al., d.. same vs. William P. Thompson, et. al., Appeals from the United States Court in the Indian Territory No. 423 October Term I898 William Stephens, et. al., vs. Cherokee Nation Appeal from the Indian Territorial United States Court No. October Term 1898 Emma Nabors, Apnellants vs. The Choctaw Nation, Appellee Appeal from the United States Court in the Indian Territory Central District Court Brief on behalf of Appellants

Transcript of Briefs from th e Suprem Coure ot f the Unite Stated s · Briefs from th e Suprem Coure ot f the...

Page 1: Briefs from th e Suprem Coure ot f the Unite Stated s · Briefs from th e Suprem Coure ot f the Unite Stated s No. 485 October Ter m I898 The Chickasa Nationw Appellan, t vs. T. D.

Briefs from the Supreme Court of the United States

No. 485 October Term I898 The Chickasaw Nation, Appellant

vs. T . D. Arnold, et. al., Brief in opposition to motion to advance

No. 496 October Term 1899 The United States, Appellant

vs. Richard C . Wiggs, et. al,, Motion to dismiss appeal Brief for Appellant

same Appeal from District Court in Chickasaw Natiion Brief for Appellant

Nos. 469, 470, 471, 472, 473 October Term I898

a . The Chickasaw Nation, Appellant vs.

A . B , Roff, Appellees

b . same vs.

A,J, Love

c. same vs.

Andrew B . Hill, et. al.,

d.. same vs.

William P . Thompson, et. al., Appeals from the United States Court in the Indian Territory

No. 423 October Term I898 William Stephens, et. al.,

vs. Cherokee Nation Appeal from the Indian Territorial United States Court

No. October Term 1898 Emma Nabors, Apnellants

vs. The Choctaw Nation, Appellee Appeal from the United States Court in the Indian Territory Central District Court Brief on behalf of Appellants

Page 2: Briefs from th e Suprem Coure ot f the Unite Stated s · Briefs from th e Suprem Coure ot f the Unite Stated s No. 485 October Ter m I898 The Chickasa Nationw Appellan, t vs. T. D.

United States Supereme Court

6 . N o . October Term 1898 William Stephens, e t . al., Appellants

v s . The Cherokee Nation, Appellee Appeal from the United States Court in the Indian Territory Northern Judicial Di&rict Brief on behalf of/appellee

1

7 . N o . 469 to 536 inclusive, October Term I898 Chickasaw Citizenship Cases Find/mgs of Facts

8 . N o . 527 October Term 1898 George S , Perry, et. al., Appellants

v s . The Chickasaw Nation Appeal from the District Court in the Indian Territory Brief for Appellee

9 . No, ^-53 and others October Term, I898 The Choctaw Nation, Appellant

v s . F . R . Robinson, Appellees

Appeals from the United States Court in the Indian Territory

same Brief of Appellees Brief on the Choctaw Cases 1898

10, N o . 3^-0 October Term 1902 The Cherokee Nation, et, al.

f Appellants

vs. Ethan A . Hitchcock, Secretary of the Interior Appeal from the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia,

11. N o . October Term 1902 Ex Parte? In the matter of U . S . Joins, Petitioner' Supplemental Reply and Br'ef of the Choctaw and Chickasaw Nations to the moti n for leave t^ file a petition for writs of pro-hibition and for Certiorari, against the Choctaw and Chickasaw Citizenship Court.

same Motion for leave to file petition for writ of prohibition, and for Certiorari against the Choctaw and Chickasaw Citizenship Court and the.'judges and clerk thereof and the petition for same.

same Motion by the Solicitor-General to change return day of rule to show cause.

Page 3: Briefs from th e Suprem Coure ot f the Unite Stated s · Briefs from th e Suprem Coure ot f the Unite Stated s No. 485 October Ter m I898 The Chickasa Nationw Appellan, t vs. T. D.

United States Supereme Court

same Reply and Brief ofthe Choctaw and Chickasaw Nations to the motion for leave to file a petition for writs of prohibition and for Certiorari against the Choctaw and Chickasaw Citizenship Court.

v 12. Ex Parte: In the matter of L . L . Blake and others, Petitioners

October Term 1903 Petition for writs of prohibition and Certiorari to the Choctaw and Chickasaw Citizenship Court.

same Supplemental tirief of petitioner and brief of reply to briefs c^the United States and Choctaw and Chickasaw Nations,

same Petition for writs of prohibition and Certiorari to the Choctaw and Chickasaw Citizenship Court. Brief for the United States.

Demurer of Petitioner to reply, answer and return to rule to show cause.

Return to rule to show cause.

13. Nos. 322, 323, October Term, 1903 The United States

v s .

The Choctaw and Chickasaw Nation

Brief of behalf of the Choctaw Nation and the Chickasaw Nation, Appellees,

same Brief for the United States and the Chickasaw Freedmea.

same Appeals from the Court of Claims, motion to advance.

14. N o . 4.53 October Term, I898 The Choctaw Nation

vs.

F . R . Robinson

ifl5. N o . 346 October Term, 1905 The United States

vs.

The Cherokee Nation

16. N o . 347 October Term I905 The Eastern Chero<ees

v s . The United States and The Cherokee Nation

Page 4: Briefs from th e Suprem Coure ot f the Unite Stated s · Briefs from th e Suprem Coure ot f the Unite Stated s No. 485 October Ter m I898 The Chickasa Nationw Appellan, t vs. T. D.

United States Supereme Court

17. No. 3^8 October Term, 1905 The Cherokee Nation

v s . The United States Brief of the Eastern Cherokees

i

18. N o . M 9 October Term,1905 Daniel Redbird, et. al., Citizens of the Cherokee Nation by blood, Appellants

v s . The United States, Appellee

19. N o . U-20 October Term, 1905 The Cherokee Nation, Appellant

v s . The United States.

"3

20. No. October Term, 190 5 Francis B . Fite, et. al;, Intermarried white person, dlaiming to be entitled to citizenship in the Cherokee Nation, Appellants

vs. The United States,

Z-21. N o . 47? October Term, 1905

The persons claiming rights in the Cherokee Nation by intermarriage, Appellants,

vs. The United States,

22. N o . 260 October Term, 19''6 Hugh Wallace, et. al», Plaintiffs in error,

v s . Mrs, Ella Adams, for herself and as natural guard*an and next friend of Henry McSwain and Mona McSwain, her minor children, defendants in error

5

In error to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit,

same

Motion of the Choctaw and Chickasaw Nations asking leave to file brief and arguement as Amici Curiae.

same

Brief and Arguement on behalf of theChoctaw and Chickasaw Nations,

same Brief for Defendants in error.

23, No. 117 October Term, 196

L . A , Nixon, Plaintiff in error, v s .

C . C . Herndon and Charles Porr$3

Page 5: Briefs from th e Suprem Coure ot f the Unite Stated s · Briefs from th e Suprem Coure ot f the Unite Stated s No. 485 October Ter m I898 The Chickasa Nationw Appellan, t vs. T. D.

United States Supereme Court

In error to the District Court of the United States for the western

district of Texas.

24. No. 305 October Term 19^6 ^ „ , ,

Pan American Petroleum and Transport Company, Pan American Petroleum Company, Petitioners,

vs. The United States of America. _ . .. On writ of Certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals

for the ninth circuit. 2 copies

25. N o . 615 October Term, 1936 The Choctaw Nation, Petitioner^

vs. Th« United States and the Chickasaw Nation On petition for writ of Certiorari to the Court ofClaims,

same , Brief for the United States in oppositions 6 copies

26. No. 668 Cotober Term, 1937 The United States, Petitioner

v s . .. Shoshone Tribe of Indians of theWind River Reservation in Wyoming

On writ of Certiorari to the Court of Claims.

27. No. 707 October Term, 1937 The United States, Appellant,

vs. _ The Klamath and Moadoc Tribes and Yahooskin Band of Sna*e Indi

Appeal from the Court of Claims.

28. N o . 880 October Term, 1938 . The Chickasaw Nation, Petitioner,

vs. The United States

Onppesition for a writ of Certiorari to the Court of Claims,

same

Brief for the United States in opposition 3 copies

29. No. 80 October Term, 1942 TheJChoctaw Nation of Indians, Petitioner,

vs. The United £Btates and the Chickasaw Nation of Indians, Hespondant

(in;.'writ of Certiorari to the Court of Claims.

i- Brief for respondant, the Chickasaw N a t i o n ^

same x

v

On petition7

"for a writ of Certiotiai to the Court of Claims ; Memorandum

for the United States,

Page 6: Briefs from th e Suprem Coure ot f the Unite Stated s · Briefs from th e Suprem Coure ot f the Unite Stated s No. 485 October Ter m I898 The Chickasa Nationw Appellan, t vs. T. D.

United States Supereme Court

same On writ of Certiorari to the Court of Claims, Supplemental brief on behalf of the Choctaw Nation of Indians.

same On petition of the Choctaw Nation for writ of Certiorari to the Court of Claims. Reply of the Choctaw Nation to the memorandum for the United States and brief of the respondant, The Chickasaw Nation,

Miscellaneous Briefs from the Supreme Court of the United States.

1. 'Opinion of the Supreme Court of the United States in the Cherokee, Chickasaw, Choctaw and Creek Citizenship Cases.

2 , In the Supreme Court of the State of Oklahoma Ap-neal from the Superior Court of Logan County Brief of the defendants in support of theri demurrer to the amended pet-ition.

j y The United Stales and theWichita and Affliated Bands of Indians, Appellants,

v s . The Choctaw and Chickasaw Nations, Anpellees. Brief on behalf of the Choctaw Nation.

The Texas-Cherokees, and Associate Bands, vs.

The State of Texas Notice and motion for leave to file original bill. Bill of complaint and memorandum in support thereof.

Page 7: Briefs from th e Suprem Coure ot f the Unite Stated s · Briefs from th e Suprem Coure ot f the Unite Stated s No. 485 October Ter m I898 The Chickasa Nationw Appellan, t vs. T. D.

N o

S u p r e m e C o u r t o f t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s

O c t o b e r T

e r m , 1 9 0 2

E x P a r t e : I n t h e M a t t e r O f U . S . J o i n s , P e t i t i o n e r B r i e f in s u p p o r t o f m o t i o n f o r l e a v e to f i l e P e t i t i o n f o r w r i t of p r o h i b i t i o n , a n d f o r C e r t i o r a r i , a g a i n s t t h e C h o c t a w a n d C h i c k a s a w C i t i z e n s h i p C o u e t a n d B r i e f in r e p l y 'o b r i e f f i l d d h e r e i n b v t h e C h m c t a w a n d C h i c k a s a w N a t i o n s a g a i n s t s a i d m o t i o n .

ex P a r t e : Tn t h e m a t t e r of L . L . B l a k e a n d o t h e r s , P e t i t i o n e r s

R e p l y a n d B r i e f o f t h e C h o c t a w a n d C h i c k a s a w N a t i o n s to t h e m o t i o n f>or lea ire to f i l e a p e t i t i o n f o r w r i t s f p r o h i b i t i o n , i n j u n c t i o n , a n d c e r t i o t a r i a g a i n s t t h e C h o c t a w a n d C h i c k a s a w C i t i z e n s h i p C o u r t . O c t o b e r T e r m , 1 9 0 2 .

G e o r g e Y . C h o a t e , e t . a l ; , P l a i n t i f f s in e r r o t , v s .

M . E . T r a p p . S e c r e t a r y of t e S t a t e B o a r d of E q u a l i z a t i o n ! ,

e t . a 1 . ,

O p i n i o n s O c t o b d r ^ertn 1911

L . A.. N i x o n , ^ l a i n t i f f in e r r o r v s . C . C . H e r n d o n a n d C h a r l e s P o r r a s . M a r c h 1 ? , 1 9 2 7 T n e r r o r to tie- D i s t r i c t C o u r t of t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s f o r

thet Y e s t e r n .-B4. s t r i c t ' of r T e ^ a s . '"""e 7 n t te- t a t e s

J o h n H . M o r s e , A p p e l l a n t , v s . T h e U n i t e d S t a t e s

M a r c h 1, 1 9 2 6 A p p e a l f r o m t h e C o u r t of C l a i m s .

8 8 T h e U n i t e d S t a t e s , fippellant, v s . T h e C h o c i a w N a t i o n a n d

t h e C h i c k a s a w N a t i o n .

N

° 9 0

Th e C h o c t a w N a t i o n a n d t h e C h i c k a s a w N

a ti o n , A p p e l l a n t s ,

T h e U n i t e d S t a t e s a n d t h e W i c h i t a a n d , f f l i a t e d S a n d s of

I n d i a n s .

A p p e a l s f r o m t h e C o u r t of C l a i m s .

T n o n e voltimfe.^ :

' ' n i — -1

Page 8: Briefs from th e Suprem Coure ot f the Unite Stated s · Briefs from th e Suprem Coure ot f the Unite Stated s No. 485 October Ter m I898 The Chickasa Nationw Appellan, t vs. T. D.

T r a n s c r i p t o f R e c o r d Su p r e

r n ^ C o u r t of t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s .

N o . 260 Hkisrh W a l l a c e , H

r

ill W a l l a c e , V e r g e Croodwin, e t . a l , , P l a i n t i f f s in e r r o r ,

vs . M r s . P 1 la \dains, f o r h e r s e l f a n d a s n a t u r a l g u a r d i a n a n d n e x t f r i e n d of H e n r y M c S w a i n a n d R o m a M c S w a i n , h e r m i n o r c h i l d r e n .

In e r r o r to t h e U n i t e d S t a t e d C i r c u i t C o u r t of A p p e a l s f o r t h e e i g h t h c i r c u i t .

F i l e d A p r i l 2 Q , 1 9 0 6 .

N o . 3 2 2 T h e U n i t e d S t a t e s , A p p e l l a n t ,

v s .

T h e C h o c t a w N a t i o n a n d t h e C h i c k a s a w N a t i o n .

N o . 3 2 3

T h e C h i c k a s a w F r e e d m e n , A p p e l l a n t s ,

v s .

T h e C h o c t a w N a t i o n a n d t h e C h i c k a s a w N a t i o n

A p p e a l s f r o m t h e C o u r t of C l a i m s . 3 c o p i e s

F i l e d J u n e 1 7 , 1 9 0 3 .

N o . h 6 9 T h e C h i c k a s a w N a t i o n , A p p e l l a n t ,

V S ' .

A . B . R o f f , e t . a l . ,

A p p e a l f r o m t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s C o u r t in t h e I n d i a n T e r r i t o r y .

F i l e d O c t o b e r , 2 8 , 1 8 9 8 .

N o . 4 7 0

T h e C h i c k a s a w N a t i o n . A p p e l l a n t , vs .

J e s s e L , Trou£>

A p p e a l f r o m t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s C o u r t in t h e I n d i a n T e r r i t o r y

F i l e d O c t o b e r . 2 9 , 1 8 9 8 . 2 c o p i e s

Ko. 5 ? 5

T h e C h i c k a s a w N a t i o n , A p p e l l a n t , v s .

G i l l i a n A . A r n o l d e t . a i . ,

A p p e a l f r o m t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s C o u r t in t h e I n d i a n T e r r i t o r y .

F i l e d O c t o b e r 2 8 , 1898*

Page 9: Briefs from th e Suprem Coure ot f the Unite Stated s · Briefs from th e Suprem Coure ot f the Unite Stated s No. 485 October Ter m I898 The Chickasa Nationw Appellan, t vs. T. D.

T r a n s c r i p t s of R e c o r d S u p r e m e C & u r t of t h e U . a .

N o . 5 2 7 G e o r g e F . P e r r y e t . a l , , A p p e l l a n t s ,

v s • T h e C h i c k a s a w N a t i o n ,

A p p e a l f r o m t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s C o u r t in trie I n d i a n T e r r i t o r y

F i l e d O c t o b e r , 2 8 , 1 8 9 8 .

No. 591 T h e O s a g e N a t i o n of I n d i a n s , A p p e l l a n t ,

v s .

T h e U n i t e d S t a t e s

A p p e a l f r o m f

he C o u r t of C l a i m s

F i l e d D e c e m b e r , 1 8 , 1 9 2 8 .

N o . Einma N a b o r s et al . , A p p e l l a n t s ,

vs . T h e C h o c t a w N a t i o n

A p p e a l f r o m t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s C o u r t in t h e I n d i a n

T e r r i t o r y .

F i l d e D e c e m b e r , 2 9 , 1 8 9 8 .

N o . 8 8 0

T h e C h i c k a s a w N a t i o n , P e t i t i o n e r vs .

T h e U n i t e d S t a t e s

O n P e t i t i o n f o r w r i t o C e r t i o r a r i to t h e C o u r t of C l a i m s .

F i l e d A p r i l 1 7 , 1939»