Briefing - Europa2017)614604_EN.pdf · 101 303 1 150 2 106 Notes. Asylum is a form of international...

4
Frontex, the EU border surveillance agency, collects data on detections by national border-control authorities of illegal crossings of the EU’s external borders. External borders are those between Member States and third countries, as well as between Schengen Associated Countries (Norway, Iceland and Switzerland) and third countries. The map shows the different routes and the number of illegal entries into the EU in 2016 for each route. The line chart shows the number of illegal crossings at six-monthly intervals, and the pie chart the share that each route represents in the total. The four boxes below denote the monthly average number of illegal border crossings for each route. The table shows the top ten nationalities of migrants. Detections of illegal border crossings in the EU (2016) Central Mediterranean 2014 2015 2016 2017 14 13 15 14 Monthly average (in 1 000) Eastern Mediterranean 2014 2015 2016 2017 4 74 15 2 Monthly average (in 1 000) 511 130 Detecons of illegal border crossings in the EU in 2016 (1 822 177 in 2015) Migratory routes 2014 2015 2016 2017 1 1 1 2 Western Mediterranean Monthly average (in 1 000) 2014 2015 2016 2017 4 64 11 1 Western Balkans Monthly average (in 1 000) All routes 6 monthly data (in 1 000) 2014 2015 2016 2017 91 192 228 1 594 360 151 114 Other: 1.3% Western African: 0.1% Western Mediterranean: 2% Western Balkans Central Mediterranean Eastern Mediterranean 36% 36% 25% 511 130 Eastern Mediterranean 182 277 Western Balkans 130 261 Central Mediterranean 181 459 Western Mediterranean 9 990 Western Africa 671 Wester ern n Africa 671 67 71 Casablanca Dakar Accra Agadez Sebha Lampedusa Tripoli Algiers Oran Oujda Ouargla Cairo Addis Ababa Alexandria Lagos Afghanistan, 54 Côte d'Ivoire, 14 Eritrea, 21 Gambia, 13 Guinea, 16 Iraq, 32 Nigeria, 38 Others, 112 Pakistan, 18 Syria, 89 Unknown, 104 Top ten migrant naonalies (2016) (in 1 000) This infographic complements the Briefing entled ‘Towards a Global Compact on Migraon’. Recent migraon flows to the EU EPRS | European Parliamentary Research Service Authors: Giulio Sabba and Joanna Apap Members’ Research Service PE 614.604 Briefing December 2017 Infographic

Transcript of Briefing - Europa2017)614604_EN.pdf · 101 303 1 150 2 106 Notes. Asylum is a form of international...

Page 1: Briefing - Europa2017)614604_EN.pdf · 101 303 1 150 2 106 Notes. Asylum is a form of international protection given by a state on its territory to someone who is threatened by persecution

Frontex, the EU border surveillance agency, collects data on detections by national border-control authorities of illegal crossings of the EU’s external borders. External borders are those between Member States and third countries, as well as between Schengen Associated Countries (Norway, Iceland and Switzerland) and third countries.

The map shows the different routes and the number of illegal entries into the EU in 2016 for each route. The line chart shows the number of illegal crossings at six-monthly intervals, and the pie chart the share that each route represents in the total. The four boxes below denote the monthly average number of illegal border crossings for each route. The table shows the top ten nationalities of migrants.

Detections of illegal border crossings in the EU (2016)

Central Mediterranean

2014 2015 2016 2017

14 13 15 14Monthly average(in 1 000)

Eastern Mediterranean

2014 2015 2016 20174

74

152Monthly average

(in 1 000)

511 130Detec�ons of illegal border crossings in the EU in 2016 (1 822 177 in 2015) Migratory routes

2014 2015 2016 20171 1 1 2

Western Mediterranean

Monthly average(in 1 000)

2014 2015 2016 20174

64

111

Western Balkans

Monthly average(in 1 000)

All routes 6 monthly data (in 1 000)

2014 2015 2016 201791 192 228

1 594

360 151 114

Other: 1.3%Western African: 0.1%WesternMediterranean: 2%

WesternBalkans

CentralMediterranean

EasternMediterranean

36%

36%

25%

511 130

EasternMediterranean 182 277

WesternBalkans 130 261

CentralMediterranean 181 459

WesternMediterranean 9 990

WesternAfrica 671WesterernnAfrica 6716771

Casablanca

Dakar

Accra

Agadez

Sebha

LampedusaTripoli

AlgiersOran

OujdaOuargla

Cairo

Addis Ababa

Nairobi

Alexandria

Lagos

Afghanistan, 54

Côte d'Ivoire, 14

Eritrea, 21

Gambia, 13

Guinea, 16

Iraq, 32

Nigeria, 38Others, 112

Pakistan, 18

Syria, 89

Unknown, 104

Top ten migrant na�onali�es (2016) (in 1 000)

This infographic complements the Briefing entitled ‘Towards a Global Compact on Migration’.

Recent migration flows to the EU

EPRS | European Parliamentary Research ServiceAuthors: Giulio Sabbati and Joanna ApapMembers’ Research ServicePE 614.604

BriefingDecember 2017Infographic

Page 2: Briefing - Europa2017)614604_EN.pdf · 101 303 1 150 2 106 Notes. Asylum is a form of international protection given by a state on its territory to someone who is threatened by persecution

Missing migrants along the Mediterranean migratory routesThe International Organization for Migration (IOM) carries out the Missing Migrants project, aimed at compiling data on migrants who have died or gone missing, either at the external borders or in the migration process. It excludes, for instance, deaths in refugee camps or during return to a migrant’s homeland, or as a result of labour exploitation. Various sources of data are used such as relevant national authorities, IOM field missions, direct reporting by IOM and other organisations receiving survivors and media reports. IOM and UNHCR make sure that data are consistent.

The map shows the number of deaths on the Mediterranean routes from January to November 2017. The bar chart below on the left compares the number of deaths for the same period (Jan - Nov) for the last four years. The line chart shows the evolution of the phenomenon by six-monthly periods.The three boxes on the right represent the monthly average number of migrant deaths on the three Mediterranean routes in the last four years, as well as a gender estimate.

It can be seen, for instance, that in 2015, despite the increase in migrant flows in the Eastern Mediterranean (see previous page), the Central Mediterranean remained the more deadly route, with nearly two deaths for every 100 travellers.

Eastern Mediterranean

2014 2015 2016 201712

81 43 9Monthly average

Gender

FM

Central Mediterranean

2014 2015 2016 2017

288 240382

255

Monthly average

Gender

FM

2014 2015 2016 201715 13 12 15

Western Mediterranean

Monthly average

Gender

F

M

6 monthly data (in 1 000)

2014 2015 2016 2017

0.7 2.5 2.1 1.9 2.9 2.2 2.3 0.8

Jan - Nov2017

Jan - Nov2016

Jan - Nov2015

Jan - Nov2014

3 283 3 785

5 143

3 033

2 803Central Mediterranean

2 803Central Mediterranean

61Eastern Mediterranean

169Western Mediterranean

1 - 5

6 - 16

17 - 33

34 - 74

Missing migrantsNumber of dead

LEGEND

3 033Deaths of migrants recorded in the Mediterranean in 2017 (Jan - Nov)

Notes. Data on fatalities are challenging to collect because reporting on deaths is poor, countless bodies are never found and the involvement of criminal actors means there may be fear among survivors to report deaths, and some deaths may be actively covered up. For instance, in 2015, over 50% of deaths recorded by the Missing Migrants Project refer to migrants who are presumed dead and whose bodies have not been found (mainly at sea). The sex of the deceased is unknown in over 80% of cases.

Members’ Research Service Page 2 of 4

Recent migration flows to the EUEPRS

Page 3: Briefing - Europa2017)614604_EN.pdf · 101 303 1 150 2 106 Notes. Asylum is a form of international protection given by a state on its territory to someone who is threatened by persecution

Asylum applicants in the EU-28The bar chart shows the number of asylum applicants in the European Union. ‘Applicants’ refers to anyone applying for asylum or similar protection – as defined in the Qualification Directive – or included in an application as a family member. Data are presented for six-monthly periods. The table shows the breakdown of those Member States which together represent more than 90% of the total requests for asylum in the first six months of 2017.

The map shows the relative weight of the number of applicants per million inhabitants in the ‘country of arrival’ (the EU Member State in which asylum has been requested) for the period from January to June 2017. The EU average is 669 applicants per million inhabitants. The bar below the map shows the range of applicants within the Member States. The horizontal bar chart shows the top 20 countries of origin for the period January to June 2017. The value in parenthesis represents changes with respect to the same period in 2016; a positive value shows an increase, negative a decrease (e.g. there was a decrease of 166 000 applicants from Syria in the first half of 2017 compared to the same period in 2017).

2014 2015 2016 2017

Jan-Jun Jul-Dec Jan-Jun Jul-Dec Jan-Jun Jul-Dec Jan-JunDE 78 125 182 295 411 334 101IT 25 40 30 53 50 73 72FR 32 32 32 44 41 43 47EL 5 5 6 7 18 33 28UK 15 18 16 24 21 19 16ES 2 3 7 8 7 9 14AT 9 19 28 60 26 17 12SE 32 49 29 134 15 13 11BE 10 13 12 33 9 9 9Others 34 81 101 222 62 50 30

In 1 000 applicantsIn 1 000 applicants

0

200

400

600

800

1000

242

2014Jan-Jun

2014Jul-Dec

2015Jan-Jun

2015Jul-Dec

2016Jan-Jun

2016Jul-Dec

2017Jan-Jun

385443

880

660601

341

Top 20 countries of origin

In 1 000 applicants

(-166)(-74)

(5)(-54)(-10)

(-1)(-2)(4)(5)

(-12)(-6)(4)(0)

(-2)(2)(2)(4)(1)

(-2)(0)

SyriaAfghanistan

NigeriaIraq

PakistanAlbaniaEritrea

BangladeshGuinea

IranRussia

Côte d'IvoireGambiaSomaliaSenegal

TurkeyVenezuela

MaliUkraineAlgeria

0 10 20 30 40 50

AlgeriaUkraine

MaliVenezuela

TurkeySenegalSomaliaGambia

Côte d'IvoireRussia

IranGuinea

BangladeshEritrea

AlbaniaPakistan

IraqNigeria

AfghanistanSyria 45.6

24.422.221.5

16.213.2

11.911.010.19.28.4

7.87.6

6.66.26.15.65.55.3

4.8

Asylum applicants per million inhabitant(2015)

More than 3 000

2 000 - 3 000

1 000 - 1 999

200 - 999

Less than 200

Applicants per million inhabitants

2 582172 1061 150303101

Notes. Asylum is a form of international protection given by a state on its territory to someone who is threatened by persecution on grounds of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular group or political opinion in their country of origin or residence. In the EU, this consists of refugee status as defined in the UN Geneva Refugee Convention, plus subsidiary protection for persons who do not qualify as refugees but in respect of whom substantial grounds exist that the person concerned, if returned to their country of origin, would face a real risk of suffering serious harm as defined in the Qualification Directive.Not all those who cross the EU’s external borders illegally will seek asylum, or indeed qualify under the definition above. They thus form part of the broader category of ‘irregular immigrants’, i.e. those who do not fulfil, or no longer fulfil, the conditions of entry as set out in Article 5 of the Schengen Borders Code or other conditions for entry, stay or residence in that Member State.

Country code: Belgium (BE), Bulgaria (BG), Germany (DE), Greece (EL), Spain (ES), France (FR), Italy (IT), Austria (AT), Sweden (SE), United Kingdom (UK). Others: Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Ireland, Croatia, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Hungary, Netherlands, Po-land, Portugal, Romania, Slovenia, Slovakia and Finland.

Members’ Research Service Page 3 of 4

Recent migration flows to the EUEPRS

Page 4: Briefing - Europa2017)614604_EN.pdf · 101 303 1 150 2 106 Notes. Asylum is a form of international protection given by a state on its territory to someone who is threatened by persecution

First instance decisions (in Eurostat data) refer to decisions taken by administrative or judicial bodies in Member States on refugee status and subsidiary protection, as well as authorisations to stay for humanitarian reasons. First instance decisions also include decisions granted to persons who are subject to the Dublin Regulation.The number of asylum applicants and the number of first instance decisions during a given year differs. This is due to the time elapsed between a request being submitted and the decision. This time varies considerably, depending on national asylum procedures and the administrative workload of Member States.The first graph shows the aggregate of positive decisions for the EU-28. The bar represents the positive decisions in thousands while the circles give the percentage that positive decisions represent in total decisions. The second graph presents the distribution between positive and negative decisions by Member State for the period January - June 2017.

First instance decisions on asylum in the EU-28

Positive first instance decisions on asylum in the EU-28

0 %

20 %

40 %

60 %

80 %

100 % Negative decision

Positive decision

HUCZHRPLBGDKFRUKESELITFI

EU-2

8NLSEDEBELUCYPTSIATIEROSKMTLVEELT

83%

76%

80%

74%

67%

66%

64%

63%

58%

57%

57%

54%

52%

51%

51%

49%

48%

46%

43%

40

%38

%33

%33

%32

%31

%25

%22

%15

%12

%

17%

24%

20%

26%

33%

34%

36%

37%

42%

43%

43%

46%

48% 49%

49% 51

%52

%54

%57

%60

%62

%67

%67

%68

%69

%75

%78

%85

%88

%

Nega�ve decisionsPosi�ve decisons

20 %

30 %

40 %

50 %

60 %

70 %

Total positive decisions

0

100

200

300

400

500 Total positive decisions

2017Jan-Jun

2016Jul-Dec

2016Jan-Jun

2015Jul-Dec

2015Jan-Jun

2014Jul-Dec

2014Jan-Jun

43.1%

47.6%46.8%

55.5%

59.2%62.0%

48.1%

7197

116

191

281

392

276

Posi�ve decisions (le� axis, in 1 000)Posi�ve decisions as % of total decisions (right axis)

First instance decisions on asylum by Member State (Jan - Jun 2017)

0 %

20 %

40 %

60 %

80 %

100 % Negative decision

Positive decision

HUCZHRPLBGDKFRUKESELITFI

EU-2

8NLSEDEBELUCYPTSIATIEROSKMTLVEELT

83%

76%

80%

74%

67%

66%

64%

63%

58%

57%

57%

54%

52%

51%

51%

49%

48%

46%

43%

40

%38

%33

%33

%32

%31

%25

%22

%15

%12

%

17%

24%

20%

26%

33%

34%

36%

37%

42%

43%

43%

46%

48% 49%

49% 51

%52

%54

%57

%60

%62

%67

%67

%68

%69

%75

%78

%85

%88

%

Nega�ve decisionsPosi�ve decisons

20 %

30 %

40 %

50 %

60 %

70 %

Total positive decisions

0

100

200

300

400

500 Total positive decisions

2017Jan-Jun

2016Jul-Dec

2016Jan-Jun

2015Jul-Dec

2015Jan-Jun

2014Jul-Dec

2014Jan-Jun

43.1%

47.6%46.8%

55.5%

59.2%62.0%

48.1%

7197

116

191

281

392

276

Posi�ve decisions (le� axis, in 1 000)Posi�ve decisions as % of total decisions (right axis)

0 %

20 %

40 %

60 %

80 %

100 % Negative decision

Positive decision

HUCZHRPLBGDKFRUKESELITFI

EU-2

8NLSEDEBELUCYPTSIATIEROSKMTLVEELT

83%

76%

80%

74%

67%

66%

64%

63%

58%

57%

57%

54%

52%

51%

51%

49%

48%

46%

43%

40

%38

%33

%33

%32

%31

%25

%22

%15

%12

%

17%

24%

20%

26%

33%

34%

36%

37%

42%

43%

43%

46%

48% 49%

49% 51

%52

%54

%57

%60

%62

%67

%67

%68

%69

%75

%78

%85

%88

%

Nega�ve decisionsPosi�ve decisons

20 %

30 %

40 %

50 %

60 %

70 %

Total positive decisions

0

100

200

300

400

500 Total positive decisions

2017Jan-Jun

2016Jul-Dec

2016Jan-Jun

2015Jul-Dec

2015Jan-Jun

2014Jul-Dec

2014Jan-Jun

43.1%

47.6%46.8%

55.5%

59.2%62.0%

48.1%

7197

116

191

281

392

276

Posi�ve decisions (le� axis, in 1 000)Posi�ve decisions as % of total decisions (right axis)

0 %

20 %

40 %

60 %

80 %

100 % Negative decision

Positive decision

HUCZHRPLBGDKFRUKESELITFI

EU-2

8NLSEDEBELUCYPTSIATIEROSKMTLVEELT

83%

76%

80%

74%

67%

66%

64%

63%

58%

57%

57%

54%

52%

51%

51%

49%

48%

46%

43%

40

%38

%33

%33

%32

%31

%25

%22

%15

%12

%

17%

24%

20%

26%

33%

34%

36%

37%

42%

43%

43%

46%

48% 49%

49% 51

%52

%54

%57

%60

%62

%67

%67

%68

%69

%75

%78

%85

%88

%

Nega�ve decisionsPosi�ve decisons

20 %

30 %

40 %

50 %

60 %

70 %

Total positive decisions

0

100

200

300

400

500 Total positive decisions

2017Jan-Jun

2016Jul-Dec

2016Jan-Jun

2015Jul-Dec

2015Jan-Jun

2014Jul-Dec

2014Jan-Jun

43.1%

47.6%46.8%

55.5%

59.2%62.0%

48.1%

7197

116

191

281

392

276

Posi�ve decisions (le� axis, in 1 000)Posi�ve decisions as % of total decisions (right axis)

Data source: Frontex, International Organization for Migration (IOM) and Eurostat (migr_asyappctzm and migr_asydcfstq)Extraction date: data were extracted in November/December 2017.This Infographic updates and complements previous editions issued in September 2015 (PE 565.905), in April 2016 (PE 580.893) and in February 2017 (PE 595.918).

Disclaimer and Copyright. This document is prepared for, and addressed to, the Members and staff of the European Parliament as background material to assist them in their parliamentary work. The content of the document is the sole responsibility of its author(s) and any opinions expressed herein should not be taken to represent an official position of the Parliament. Reproduction and translation for non-commercial purposes are authorised, provided the source is acknowledged and the European Parliament is given prior notice and sent a copy. © European Union, 2017.

[email protected] – http://www.eprs.ep.parl.union.eu (intranet) – http://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank (internet) – http://epthinktank.eu (blog)

Members’ Research Service Page 4 of 4

Recent migration flows to the EUEPRS